{news} RE: {forum} CT may increase to 4 delgates on National committee..in thenear future

Mon May 14 21:45:09 EDT 2007

More importantly we need to know NOW what openings there are on National 
committees.Members and officers have requested this from our two delagates 
for months. We are missing oppertunities for input  and 
knowledge/participation in USGP. Also how long does SCC members and officers 
toerate allow USGP chair oeople not reporting to SCC or writing reports for 
almost 3 years such as our delagate to Internationational committee Justine 
McCabe. Shouldnl't National views and platfrom be run by State 
GPsmerelistings on forum don't do . When will nthis change?    Amy

>From: Green Party-CT <greenpartyct at yahoo.com>
>To: ctgp-news at ml.greens.org, GPCT FORUM <ctgp-forum at ml.greens.org>
>Subject: {forum} CT may increase to 4 delgates on National committee..in 
>thenear future
>Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Connecticut Green Party - Part of the GPUS
>http://www.ctgreens.org/ - http://www.greenpartyus.org/
>
>to unsubscribe click here
>mailto://ctgp-forum-unsubscribe@ml.greens.org

>
>
>Aram Falsafi <aram at aramfalsafi.com> wrote:  Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 07:48:54 
>-0700
>From: Aram Falsafi <aram at aramfalsafi.com>
>To: usgp-coo at gp-us.org
>CC: app-com at lists.gp-us.org
>Subject: [usgp-nc] Planning for apportionment changes and National Meeting
>
>To National Committee delegates:
>
>The GPUS Apportionment Standing Committee is making its best effort to 
>submit
>the new apportionment numbers to be implemented before the national 
>meeting. In
>addition to the mandate in Proposal 272 for the Apportionment Standing 
>Committee
>to calculate the numbers in a timely manner, many feel that ensuring that 
>all
>state parties have fair representation in upcoming elections is important 
>in
>order to have sufficient participation in the Presidential nomination 
>process.
>
>Rather than require state parties to do all the research required for the
>calculation, the committee is doing research on available data and will be
>submitting all of that to your state parties for review and possible 
>correction
>shortly. Meanwhile, we are publishing below our current estimate of the 
>final
>apportionment numbers, based on the latest formula changes and inclusion of 
>2006
>data.
>
>To allow for the smoothest, most cooperative planning for the national 
>meeting,
>we strongly encourage your state parties to plan for more than one 
>contingency.
>Examples of options some state parties are employing are:
>
>* for an expected increase, planning to fill all the seats, but informing
>delegates that not all the seats are definite yet and asking for volunteers 
>to
>serve as alternates if necessary
>
>* for an expected decrease, planning to fill the smaller delegation, but 
>asking
>for alternates to be ready to fill the delegate seats if necessary
>
>* calculating ranked ballot results for different sizes of delegations and
>informing all potential delegates of the possible results
>
>* using the option of proxies at the national meeting to give the state 
>party
>additional flexibility in making contingency plans.
>
>Thank you for your cooperation and consideration of the various needs 
>within the
>party.
>
>-Aram Falsafi
>chair, GPUS Apportionment Standing Committee
>on behalf of the GPUS Apportionment Standing Committee
>
>
>
>State Number of votes
>Alabama 2
>Alaska 2
>Arizona 2
>Arkansas 2
>California 42
>Colorado 3
>Connecticut 4
>Delaware 2
>District of Columbia 4
>Florida 4
>Georgia 2
>Hawaii 2
>Idaho 2
>Illinois 10
>Indiana 2
>Iowa 2
>Kansas 2
>Louisiana 2
>Maine 9
>Maryland 4
>Massachussetts 8
>Michigan 6
>Minnesota 4
>Mississippi 2
>Missouri 2
>Montana 2
>Nebraska 2
>Nevada 2
>New Jersey 4
>New Mexico 2
>New York 9
>North Carolina 2
>Ohio 3
>Oklahoma 2
>Oregon 7
>Pennsylvania 8
>Rhode Island 2
>South Carolina 2
>Tennessee 2
>Texas 7
>Utah 2
>Vermont 2
>Virginia 2
>Washington 3
>Wisconsin 6
>Wyoming 2
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Natlcomvotes mailing list
>To send a message to the list, write to:
>Natlcomvotes at green.gpus.org
>To unsubscribe or change your list options, go to:
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/natlcomvotes
>
>If your state delegation changes, please see:
>http://gp.org/committees/nc/documents/delegate_change.html
>
>To report violations of listserv protocol, write to 
>forummanagers at lists.gp-us.org
>
>For other information about the Coordinating Committee, see:
>http://gp.org/committees/nc/
>
>
>
>
>   
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Tim McKee cell (860) 778-1304 or (860) 643-2282
>    National Committee Member of the Green Party(Connecticut)
>
>
>
>
>

>to unsubscribe click here
>mailto://ctgp-forum-unsubscribe@ml.greens.org
>_______________________________________________
>Ctgp-forum mailing list
>Ctgp-forum at ml.greens.org
>http://ml.greens.org/mailman/listinfo/ctgp-forum
>ATTENTION!
>The information in this transmission is privileged and confidential and 
>intended only for the recipient listed above.  If you have received this 
>transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete the 
>original message.  The text of this email is similar to ordinary or 
>face-to-face conversations and does not reflect the level of factual or 
>legal inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal 
>legal opinion and does not constitute a representation of the opinions of 
>the CT Green Party. The responsibility for any messages posted herein is 
>solely that of the person who sent the message, and the CT Green Party 
>hereby leaves this responsibility in the hands of it's members.
>
>NOTE: This is an inherently insecure forum, please do not post confidential 
>messages and always realize that your address can be faked, and although a 
>message may appear to be from a certain individual, it is always possible 
>that it is fakemail. This is mail sent by a third party under an illegally 
>assumed identity for purposes of coercion, misdirection, or general 
>mischief.
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
>immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown.  This e-mail 
>transmission may contain confidential information.  This information is 
>intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is 
>intended even if addressed incorrectly.  Please delete it from your files 
>if you are not the intended recipient.  Thank you for your compliance.
>
>To be removed please mailto://ctgp-forum-unsubscribe@ml.greens.org