{news} complaint to SOTS on McKinney write-in votes

[Jean de Smet]

I asked my registrar why I wasn't given the list of registered write-ins
when I asked.  She said that she didn't have the list yet since I voted
absentee, probably a week before the election.

And I was assured that all write-ins were counted, but there were none for
McKinney.

Jean


-----Original Message-----
From: ctgp-news-bounces at ml.greens.org
[mailto:ctgp-news-bounces at ml.greens.org] On Behalf Of David Bedell
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:21 PM
To: ctgp-news at ml.greens.org
Subject: {news} complaint to SOTS on McKinney write-in votes

Connecticut Green Party - Part of the GPUS
http://www.ctgreens.org/ - http://www.greenpartyus.org/

to unsubscribe click here
mailto:ctgp-news-unsubscribe at ml.greens.org
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Steve Fournier
To: 'David Bedell'
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:22 PM
Subject: complaint


Here's the complaint I mailed today to Bysiewicz.  For practical reasons, I
decided to confine this complaint to the presidential election.  We can make
further complaints about other contests after we see what sort of response
we get to this one.

Stephen Fournier
Attorney at Law
74 Tremont Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06105
Tel: 860 794 6718    Fax: 860 233 3044
stepfour at stepfour.com

December 4, 2008

Secretary of the State of Connecticut
ATTN: Administrative Offices
PO Box 150470
Hartford, CT 06115-0470

Dear Secretary Bysiewicz:

Please take notice of this complaint on behalf of the Green Party of
Connecticut.  The final tally of votes for President recorded in your office
indicates that the Green Party candidate Cynthia McKinney, a write-in,
received no votes in 140 towns, including Bridgeport, Killingly, Manchester,
New Haven, New London, Stamford and Wethersfield.

We have collected statements from voters in these towns who wrote in Cynthia
McKinney's name and from voters in Windham and Norwich (which also recorded
no write-in votes) who were told by election officials that there were no
write-in candidates for President.  We understand that the Green Party
ticket did not receive enough votes to win the election, but the law
requires that write-in votes be counted even when the write-in candidate has
no chance of winning.  Like-minded voters, even if they vote on the losing
side, are entitled to know their numbers and their distribution.

Contrary to conventional political wisdom, elections involve more than just
selecting winners.  They mark regular debates on issues of public
importance, and the results of an election are a gauge of public opinion and
give insight into the future of public policy.   Abolitionist candidates
never won an election, and neither did women's suffrage candidates, but
their candidacies over generations of struggle were a key element in the
success of these movements for human rights.

We have no way of knowing how many write-in votes went uncounted, but we are
satisfied that the selections of voters in at least seven towns were never
recorded and that officials were misinformed about write-ins in at least two
polling places.  We ask that you initiate an inspection of the "paper-trail"
in the towns that recorded no write-in votes for Cynthia McKinney to
determine whether her vote was excluded from the tally for each such town.
We ask that you investigate discrepancies between the number of write-in
ballots cast and the number of write-in votes recorded.  We ask that you
remind registrars of voters that they have a legal obligation to count and
record write-in votes.  Finally, we ask that you instruct registrars to
recount the number of write-in ballots cast for Cynthia McKinney and that
you publish the corrected totals.

Yours truly,

Stephen Fournier
Green Party of Connecticut Co-Chair



To be removed please mailto:ctgp-news-unsubscribe at ml.greens.org
_______________________________________________
CTGP-news mailing list
CTGP-news at ml.greens.org
http://ml.greens.org/mailman/listinfo/ctgp-news

ATTENTION!
The information in this transmission is privileged and confidential and
intended only for the recipient listed above.  If you have received this
transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete the
original message.  The text of this email is similar to ordinary or
face-to-face conversations and does not reflect the level of factual or
legal inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal
legal opinion and does not constitute a representation of the opinions of
the CT Green Party. The responsibility for any messages posted herein is
solely that of the person who sent the message, and the CT Green Party
hereby leaves this responsibility in the hands of it's members.

NOTE: This is an inherently insecure forum, please do not post confidential
messages and always realize that your address can be faked, and although a
message may appear to be from a certain individual, it is always possible
that it is fakemail. This is mail sent by a third party under an illegally
assumed identity for purposes of coercion, misdirection, or general
mischief.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this e-mail in error, please
immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown.  This e-mail
transmission may contain confidential information.  This information is
intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is
intended even if addressed incorrectly.  Please delete it from your files if
you are not the intended recipient.  Thank you for your compliance.

To be removed please mailto://ctgp-news-unsubscribe@ml.greens.org