{news} Fw: Post-Election Audit Observation Report

[Mike DeRosa]

Greens:
The non-counting of our write-in votes for President are not mentioned in
this report because write-in votes are not audited under present CT law.
Three Greens (Richard Duffee, Scott Deshefy, Mike DeRosa) and a Libertarian
officer (Andy Rule) met with the two co-chairs of the Government and
Elections committee( a week ago) about changing the law so that write-in
votes would be included in the audit. We also presented them with other
proposals to make ballot access law fairer (see attachment). We have not
heard anything back from them yet, but two other members of the GAE
committee are interested in meeting with us next week. 

If you would like to attend, let me know and you can come and tell them why:
All political parties are equal in CT, But some political parties are more
equal than others. See attachment for details(See bill 4-Bullet #2)

Sincerely,
Mike DeRosa





-----Original Message-----
From: ctgp-news-bounces at ml.greens.org
[mailto:ctgp-news-bounces at ml.greens.org] On Behalf Of David Bedell
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 2:21 PM
To: ctgp-news at ml.greens.org; ctgp-elections at yahoogroups.com;
CTVOTER at yahoogroups.com; RecountTheVotes at yahoogroups.com
Subject: {news} Fw: Post-Election Audit Observation Report

Connecticut Green Party - Part of the GPUS
http://www.ctgreens.org/ - http://www.greenpartyus.org/

to unsubscribe click here
mailto:ctgp-news-unsubscribe at ml.greens.org
There's still a lot of room for improvement in CT's election procedures.

David Bedell

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Update@ CTElectionAudit.org>
To: <dbedellgreen@ hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1:49 PM
Subject: Post-Election Audit Observation Report


Dear Coalition Observer,

Today we released the fourth Coalition Observation Report.  This one
covering the November 2008 post-election audits, based on your observations
and the official reports submitted by election officials.

The text of the press release follows.
The press release, full report, and excerpts are available at
http://www.ctelectionaudit.org/?p=40

Without your time and commitment to democracy, nobody but a few election
officials in each town would know how the audits were conducted.

Thank you,

Luther Weeks
Luther@ CTVotersCount.org
860-918-2115


****************************************
Press Release
****************************************
Connecticut Citizen Election Audit Coalition

Connecticut's November 2008 Post-Election Audits Report
Large Differences From Optical Scanner Totals

Coalition Calls On Legislature To Act

Hartford, Connecticut -Today, the Connecticut Citizen Election Audit
Coalition released its report on the November 2008 post-election audits.

The Coalition noted large differences between reported results by electronic
voting equipment and the hand count of ballots by election officials across
Connecticut.  In some cases as many as twenty-four (24) fewer ballots were
counted by hand than recorded by optical scanners. For individual candidate
races, vote counts between hand counts and scanner tapes varied by as much
as three-hundred-sixty-six (366) votes in one race or as much as 46% in
another.  Most officials attributed the widespread differences to the
inability to count votes accurately by hand.

Coalition spokesperson Luther Weeks noted, "Given the variation in the
counting procedures used, there is no way to distinguish when officials or
machines counted accurately or inaccurately.  When differences are dismissed
as human counting errors, it is unlikely that an audit would identify an
election error or fraud should that occur."

>From the report:
We conclude, based on our observations and analysis of audit reports
submitted to the Secretary of the State that the November post-election
audits still do not inspire confidence.Among our greatest concerns are the
discrepancies between machine counts and hand-counts reported to the
Secretary of the State by several municipalities. In many cases, these
discrepancies are not thoroughly and reasonably explained. We believe that
the ad-hoc counting procedures used by many municipalities were not
sufficient to count ballots accurately and efficiently.

Cheryl Dunson, League of Women Voters of Connecticut's Vice President of
Public Issues, stated, "We have reorganized our recommendations to the
Secretary of the State and the Legislature. Along with improvements to laws,
and audit procedures, we recommend that an Independent Audit Board be
established."

Cheri Quickmire, Executive Director, Connecticut Common Cause said, "Gaps in
ballot chain-of-custody, election accounting, and the post-election audits
must be addressed to assure integrity and provide confidence to the voters
of Connecticut"

Tom Swan, Executive Director, Connecticut Citizen Action Group, said "This
is our fourth report showing similar weaknesses in the post-election audits.
After these reports and five public hearings around the state, it is time
for the Legislature to act."

Observers came from the membership ranks of the coalition partners -- The
League of Women Voters of Connecticut, The Connecticut Citizen Action Group,
Common Cause Connecticut, and Connecticut Voters Count. The coalition's
reports are available online at: http://www.CTElectionAudit.org

*****


To be removed please mailto:ctgp-news-unsubscribe at ml.greens.org
_______________________________________________
CTGP-news mailing list
CTGP-news at ml.greens.org
http://ml.greens.org/mailman/listinfo/ctgp-news

ATTENTION!
The information in this transmission is privileged and confidential and
intended only for the recipient listed above.  If you have received this
transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete the
original message.  The text of this email is similar to ordinary or
face-to-face conversations and does not reflect the level of factual or
legal inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal
legal opinion and does not constitute a representation of the opinions of
the CT Green Party. The responsibility for any messages posted herein is
solely that of the person who sent the message, and the CT Green Party
hereby leaves this responsibility in the hands of it's members.

NOTE: This is an inherently insecure forum, please do not post confidential
messages and always realize that your address can be faked, and although a
message may appear to be from a certain individual, it is always possible
that it is fakemail. This is mail sent by a third party under an illegally
assumed identity for purposes of coercion, misdirection, or general
mischief.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this e-mail in error, please
immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown.  This e-mail
transmission may contain confidential information.  This information is
intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is
intended even if addressed incorrectly.  Please delete it from your files if
you are not the intended recipient.  Thank you for your compliance.

To be removed please mailto://ctgp-news-unsubscribe@ml.greens.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Recomendations for changing ballot access laws 2009 Green	Party of CT 2.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 15976 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/private/ctgp-news/attachments/20090128/26f37050/attachment.docx>