[TheClimate.Vote] May 23, 2017 - Daily Global Warming News

Richard Pauli richard at theclimate.vote
Tue May 23 09:43:12 EDT 2017


/May 23, 2017/

Stop hoping we can fix *climate change*by pulling carbon out of the air, 
scientists warn 
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/05/22/stop-hoping-we-can-fix-climate-change-by-pulling-carbon-out-of-the-air-scientists-warn/> 

Scientists are expressing increasing skepticism that we're going to be 
able to get out of the climate change mess by relying on a variety of 
large-scale land-use and technical solutions that have been not only 
proposed but often relied upon in scientific calculations.
Two papers published last week debunk the idea of planting large volumes 
of trees to pull carbon dioxide out of the air - saying there just isn't 
enough land available to pull it off - and also various other strategies 
for "carbon dioxide removal," some of which also include massive tree 
plantings combined with burning their biomass and storing it below the 
ground.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/05/22/stop-hoping-we-can-fix-climate-change-by-pulling-carbon-out-of-the-air-scientists-warn////
/
*Interior Department agency removes climate change language from news 
release 
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/interior-department-agency-removes-climate-change-language-from-news-release/2017/05/22/774c122a-3f23-11e7-adba-394ee67a7582_story.html?utm_term=.706dc89699a6>*
(Washington Post)  On Thursday, a group of scientists, including three 
working for the U.S. Geological Survey, published a paper that 
highlighted the link between sea-level rise and global climate change, 
arguing that previously studies may have underestimated the risk 
flooding poses to coastal communities.
However, three of the study's authors say the Department of Interior, 
under which USGS is housed, deleted a line from the news release on the 
study that discussed the role climate change played in raising Earth's 
oceans.
"While we were approving the news release, they had an issue with one or 
two of the lines," said Sean Vitousek, a research assistant professor at 
the University of Illinois at Chicago. "It had to do with climate change 
and sea-level rise."
That deleted line, they said, read:*"Global climate change drives 
sea-level rise, increasing the frequency of coastal flooding."*
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/interior-department-agency-removes-climate-change-language-from-news-release/2017/05/22/774c122a-3f23-11e7-adba-394ee67a7582_story.html


    Find out what is true and false about*climate change  (USA Today)*
    <https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/05/22/find-out-what-true-and-false-climate-change/335532001/>

The subject of climate change may or may not come up at a family 
gathering or a cocktail party. If it does, you might hear people 
debating some of the finer points of science, perhaps with little or no 
climate science background.
Skeptical Science is a science education group run by a global team of 
volunteers. It's based on scientific literature that's gone through the 
peer-review process, meaning the research has been subjected to scrutiny 
by other experts in the same field.
On its website, skepticalscience.com <https://skepticalscience.com/> 
debunks many of the most common climate change myths, including these:

    /Myth: Sure the climate's changing. It's always changing and it's
    changed before./
    Mythbuster: Climate reacts to whatever forces it to change at the
    time; humans are now the dominant force. In the past when the
    Earth's temperature jumped abruptly, much as is happening today, it
    was caused by large and rapid greenhouse gas emissions, just like
    humans are causing today.

    /Myth: Humans are too insignificant to affect global climate./
    Mythbuster: When we experience weather events like hurricanes and
    floods, it's very easy for us to feel insignificant and powerless in
    the face of such massive natural forces. But since the industrial
    revolution, with ever-increasing supplies of fossil fuels, the
    activities of a dramatically expanding world population have made
    significant alterations to the makeup of our atmosphere. This is
    resulting in a change in weather patterns and ocean currents; the
    melting of global ice formations; and an increase in extreme weather
    events.

    /Myth: It's the sun./
    Mythbuster: Over the last 35 years the sun has shown a cooling
    trend. However global temperatures continue to increase. If the
    sun's energy is decreasing while the Earth is warming, then the sun
    can't be the main control of the temperature.
    /
    //Myth: It hasn't warmed since 1998./
    Mythbuster: Every part of the Earth's climate system has continued
    warming since 1998, with 2014, 2015 and 2016 breaking temperature
    records.

    /Myth: Computer models are unreliable./
    Mythbuster: Climate models have already predicted many of the
    phenomena for which we now have empirical evidence. Climate models
    form a reliable guide to potential climate change.
    /
    //Myth: It's not so bad./
    Mythbuster: Negative impacts of global warming on agriculture,
    health and environment far outweigh any positives.

    /Myth: Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant./
    Mythbuster: We commonly think of pollutants as contaminants that
    make the environment dirty or impure. A broader definition of
    pollutant is a substance that causes instability or discomfort to an
    ecosystem, such as the rising levels of human-caused CO2 are doing now.
    /
    //Myth: There's no consensus./
    Mythbuster: There isn't a political consensus, but there's a
    scientific consensus. Authors of seven climate consensus studied
    have, depending on how exactly consensus is measured, found that
    somewhere between 90% and 100% agree humans are responsible for
    climate change, with most of the studies finding of 97% consensus
    among publishing climate scientists.

    /Myth: Scientists can't even predict the weather./
    Mythbuster: Weather and climate are different; climate predictions
    do not need the detail of a weather report. Climate models are not
    predicting day-to-day weather systems. Instead, they are predicting
    climate averages.

    /Myth: Mars is warming, too, and there are no humans there./
    Mythbuster: There is little actual evidence that Mars is warming. We
    know the sun is not heating up all the planets in our solar system
    because we can accurately measure the sun's output on Earth.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/05/22/find-out-what-true-and-false-climate-change/335532001/


Is*Global Warming*to Blame for Your Gestational Diabetes? 
<http://www.rd.com/health/conditions/gestational-diabetes-climate-change/>
According to a new study published in the Journal of the Canadian 
Medical Association (CMAJ), as the temperature outside climbs, so too 
does a woman's risk of gestational diabetes (GD), a type of diabetes 
that develops during pregnancy in women with no previous symptoms of 
diabetes. Like other types of diabetes, GD affects how the body uses 
sugar and results in high blood sugar, which can adversely affect the 
pregnancy, the health of the baby, and the health of the mother too. 
Symptoms of gestational diabetes include increased thirst, hunger, and 
urination, and blurred vision (all of which can be present in healthy 
pregnancies, which is why doctors routinely test for GD during pregnancy).
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), GD 
affects nearly 10 percent of pregnancies in the United States. What 
causes gestational diabetes: The hormones in the placenta trigger 
insulin resistance, which interferes with the body's ability to maintain 
healthy levels of blood sugar. Here's where climate change makes things 
worse.
http://www.rd.com/health/conditions/gestational-diabetes-climate-change/


    Shell CEO says*climate change*is real but energy demand growth is
    'unstoppable'
    <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/05/22/shell-ceo-says-climate-change-is-real-but-energy-demand-growth-is-unstoppable/>

Ben van Beurden, the chief executive of Royal Dutch Shell, took time to 
speak to The Washington Post on May 17 during a visit to Washington, and 
he touched on the oil giant's transformation, climate change, 
millennials, the new Trump administration, economic sanctions and the 
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.
It's been a turbulent couple of years for the Shell CEO. With the roller 
coaster in crude oil prices, the company's stock has lurched from a high 
of $83.12 a share six months after he took charge to a low of $36.87. 
The stock has climbed back, but revenue has plunged by a third since 
2013. The shareholders' annual meeting is on May 23 at The Hague.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/05/22/shell-ceo-says-climate-change-is-real-but-energy-demand-growth-is-unstoppable/


*Shell shareholders to vote for new climate change goals 
<https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/may/21/rebellious-shell-shareholders-to-vote-for-new-climate-change-goals>*
Shell shareholders including the Church of England, European pension 
funds and Dutch activists will send a signal to the board of the 
Anglo-Dutch company this week by voting for it to set new climate change 
goals.
The challenge comes from a Dutch group of retail investors, who have 
tabled a resolution for Shell's annual general meeting on Tuesday, 
asking the company to establish carbon emission reduction targets.
"A large group of institutional investors will make their 
dissatisfaction with the company's position evident by voting for this 
resolution," said Mark van Baal of Follow this. The Church of England is 
among investors supporting the proposal, along with several European 
pension funds.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/may/21/rebellious-shell-shareholders-to-vote-for-new-climate-change-goals


    NATO lawmakers warn*climate change*may worsen Middle East security
    risks
    <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-nato-climatechange-idUSKBN18I22S>  
    (Reuters)

LONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Climate change will worsen food 
and water shortages in the Middle East and north Africa, and risk 
triggering more conflict and mass migration, with serious implications 
for the wider world, lawmakers from NATO's Parliamentary Assembly said 
Monday.
"The long-term prospects for food and water security in the MENA region 
are dire," said Osman Askin Bak, a member of the Turkish Parliament who 
will present the draft report on Saturday at the Parliamentary Assembly 
- a gathering of senior parliamentarians from the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization's 28 member states.
"Climate change will worsen the region's outlook," he added.
War, poor governance, climate change and other issues have worsened 
tensions over competition for scarce water and food in the Middle East 
and north Africa, the lawmakers said.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-nato-climatechange-idUSKBN18I22S


*(Opinion) How inaction on climate change puts America's economy at risk 
<http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/energy-environment/334564-inaction-on-climate-change-puts-americas-economy-at>*  
The Hill
...it is abandoning the fight against climate change that will take away 
U.S. jobs. The economic risks of ignoring the emerging global market for 
clean energy are real. By abdicating its leadership role on global 
climate change and backing away from policies that support the Paris 
Climate Pledge, the Trump administration is - perhaps unwittingly - 
removing incentives for American companies to compete and innovate at 
the forefront of clean energy. And its actions to defund education and 
research in fundamental areas and limit immigration will further 
undermine U.S. potential as a crucible for invention and 
commercialization...
History suggests we are making a big mistake. A White House budget 
report under the Obama administration provided evidence that among all 
types of regulations benefits exceeded cost by the largest margin for 
environmental initiatives. The recently enacted Mercury and Air Toxics 
Standards was estimated to cost $8.1 billion annually, but benefits came 
in at $28 billion to $77 billion. The same regulation was estimated to 
have modest net positive impact on employment, precisely because of the 
new jobs in the pollution abatement and control industry.
Clean energy has the potential to be much larger. Policy, for instance 
in the form of a price on carbon dioxide, would prompt a reorganization 
of economic activity towards cleaner sources of energy. Once policy 
sends a clear signal, if past is prologue, American businesses will rise 
to the challenge and, in doing so, prepare to lead in a future low 
carbon world.
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/energy-environment/334564-inaction-on-climate-change-puts-americas-economy-at

*
**Climate change taking toll on clarity of Lake Tahoe water 
<http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/climate-change-taking-toll-clarity-pf-lake-tahoe-47565706>*
(ABC News) Climate change is causing Lake Tahoe to warm sooner in the 
spring than it has historically, disrupting the normal mixing of shallow 
and deep water and undercutting gains made in reversing the loss of 
clarity of the cobalt mountain lake, scientists say.
"Climate change is impacting not only Lake Tahoe's water quality, but 
also the health of its forests and its recreation-based economy," said 
Joanne Marchetta, executive director of the Tahoe Regional Planning 
Agency, which regulates the lake covering 191 square miles (495 sq. 
kilometers) along the Nevada-California border.
Until recently, the climatological cycles affecting Tahoe's clarity had 
remained fairly constant since 1968, when experts first dropped a white 
disk into the lake to measure how far down it remained visible. Back 
then, it was more than 102 feet (31 meters) compared to an average of 
about 69 feet (21 meters) now....
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/climate-change-taking-toll-clarity-pf-lake-tahoe-47565706


    *Climate Change* Threatens Nearly 1 In 5  Chicago's Tree Species:
    Report
    <https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20170522/edgebrook/chicago-trees-climate-change-park-district-us-forest-service>

Nearly one in five trees native to the Chicago area faces a serious 
threat from climate change, according to a report published by the U.S. 
Forest Service.
The study, commissioned by foresters from the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture in collaboration with nearly 100 local naturalist groups, 
found that a hotter and wetter climate could decimate the city's tree 
population if officials don't find new ways to stay ahead of the 
changing landscape.
The report zoomed out to 7 million-acre region stretching from Milwaukee 
all the way to southwestern Michigan, detailing the potential impact of 
climate change on trees native to the region. But it also zeroed in on 
the Chicago Park District, ticking off the unique challenges urban 
planters will face - and the strategies they can harness to save the 
city's tree canopy.
Of the 179 native tree species studied by the Forest Service, about 17 
percent were rated with "moderate-high or high vulnerability" to climate 
change, thanks to creeping dangers like wind damage, air pollution, heat 
stress and storm runoff.
https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20170522/edgebrook/chicago-trees-climate-change-park-district-us-forest-service


*2 more leaks found along Dakota Access pipeline 
<http://missoulian.com/business/more-leaks-found-along-dakota-access-pipeline/article_2290b183-a814-514d-b3a8-b218defaeb1c.html>*
  The Dakota Access pipeline system leaked more than 100 gallons of oil 
in North Dakota in two separate incidents in March - the second and 
third known leaks discovered as crews prepared the disputed $3.8 billion 
pipeline for operation.
Two barrels, or 84 gallons (320 liters), spilled due to a leaky flange 
at a pipeline terminal in Watford City on March 3, according to the 
state's Health Department. A flange is the section connecting two 
sections of pipeline. Oil flow was immediately cut off and the spill was 
contained on site. Contaminated snow and soil was removed. No people, 
wildlife or waterways were affected, according to the department's 
environmental health database.
A leak of half a barrel, or 20 gallons (75 liters), occurred March 5 in 
rural Mercer County, data from the federal Pipeline and Hazardous 
Materials Safety Administration show. Contaminated soil was removed, and 
no waterways were affected. There were no reported injuries to people or 
wildlife. The administration is part of the Department of Transportation.
http://missoulian.com/business/more-leaks-found-along-dakota-access-pipeline/article_2290b183-a814-514d-b3a8-b218defaeb1c.html

*Loss and damage: How do we assign responsibility for global emissions? 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-FHklqKDcs>*
Dr Jan Fuglestvedt from CICERO on calculating historical contributions 
to global emissions and Dr Friederike Otto from the University of Oxford 
on the role attribution can play in loss and damage.
Legal and moral questions are linked to direct atmospheric physical 
influences.
https://youtu.be/b-FHklqKDcs


    *Climate Change*May Force Millions Of Americans To Move Inland
    <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sea-level-climate-migrants-united-states_us_591a9e93e4b0809be157a253>

As coastal areas are deluged over this century, millions of mainland 
Americans could be forced to flee inland, where they may overwhelm 
already crowded cities, according to new research from the University of 
Georgia.
"We typically think about sea-level rise as a coastal issue, but if 
people are forced to move because their houses become inundated, the 
migration could affect many landlocked communities as well," said Mathew 
Hauer, the University of Georgia demographer who wrote the paper.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sea-level-climate-migrants-united-states_us_591a9e93e4b0809be157a253
See the Mar-A-Lago sea level rise prediction 
<http://downloads.climatecentral.org/lammimages/image_request.html> 
http://downloads.climatecentral.org/lammimages/image_request.html


/*This Day in Climate History May 23, 2011 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-link-between-climate-change-and-joplin-tornadoes-never/2011/05/23/AFrVC49G_print.html> 
-  from D.R. Tucker*
/In the Washington Post, Bill McKibben mocks the mainstream media's 
refusal to point out that extreme weather events such as the unusually 
strong tornadoes in Joplin, Missouri were predicted decades ago by 
climate scientists.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-link-between-climate-change-and-joplin-tornadoes-never/2011/05/23/AFrVC49G_print.html
(video) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhCY-3XnqS0&sns=em/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
////safely forward this email./

        . *** Privacy and Security: * This is a text-only mailing.  It
        carries no graphics nor images which may originate from remote
        servers. Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the
        receiver and sender.
        By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
        democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
        commercial purposes.
        To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject: 
        subscribe,  To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
        Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
        https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
        Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
        http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
        citizens and responsible governments of all levels.   List
        membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
        restricted to this mailing list.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20170523/4f278d71/attachment.html>


More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list