[TheClimate.Vote] April 11, 2018 - Daily Global Warming News Digest

Richard Pauli richard at theclimate.vote
Wed Apr 11 09:46:14 EDT 2018


/April 11, 2018/

[NYTimes$]
*Scott Pruitt's attack on science would paralyze the Environmental 
Protection Agency 
<https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/opinion/pruitt-attack-science-epa.html>*
By Gina McCarthy and Janet G. McCabe
26 March 2018
(The New York Times) - Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, has announced that he alone will decide 
what is and isn't acceptable science for the agency to use when 
developing policies that affect your health and the environment.
It is his latest effort to cripple the agency. Mr. Pruitt, who as 
Oklahoma's attorney general described himself 
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/e-scott-pruitt-3b771653/> as "a leading 
advocate against the E.P.A.'s activist agenda," said in an interview 
published in The Daily Caller 
<http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/19/epa-scott-pruitt-secret-science/>last 
week that he would no longer allow the agency to use studies that 
include nonpublic scientific data to develop rules to safeguard public 
health and prevent pollution.
Opponents of the agency and of mainstream climate science call these 
studies "secret science." But that's simply not true. Peer review 
ensures that the analytic methodologies underlying studies funded by the 
agency are sound.
Some of those studies, particularly those that determine the effects of 
exposure to chemicals and pollution on health, rely on medical records 
that by law are confidential because of patient privacy policies. These 
studies summarize the analysis of raw data and draw conclusions based on 
that analysis. Other government agencies also use studies like these to 
develop policy and regulations, and to buttress and defend rules against 
legal challenges. They are, in fact, essential to making sound public 
policy.
We don't have the details of the new policy. But don't be fooled by this 
talk of transparency. Mr. Pruitt and some conservative members of 
Congress are setting up a nonexistent problem in order to prevent the 
E.P.A. from using the best available science. These studies adhere to 
all professional standards and meet every expectation of the scientific 
community in terms of peer review and scientific integrity. In the case 
of the air pollution studies, a rigorous follow-up examination was done 
by the Health Effects Institute <https://www.healtheffects.org/>, a 
nonprofit research group that studies air pollution. The institute 
corroborated the findings.
In taking this action, Mr. Pruitt appears to be adopting the policies of 
the Honest and Open New E.P.A. Science Treatment Act, a bill aimed at 
the agency. Conservative lawmakers have tried to pass versions of this 
bill before to shackle the agency's rule making. That law would prohibit 
the E.P.A. from taking any action "unless all scientific and technical 
information relied on to support" it is "specifically identified, and 
publicly available in a manner sufficient for independent analysis and 
substantial reproduction of research results."

An analysis of a similar bill introduced in 2015 by the Congressional 
Budget Office estimated it would cost $250 million a year over the first 
few years to carry out because it would require new "data collection, 
correspondence and coordination with study authors, construction of a 
database to house necessary information, and public dissemination" of 
the information.

The analysis, which did not appear to take into account the cost of 
redacting details like trade secrets or personally identifiable medical 
information, also predicted the agency would reduce by half the number 
of studies it relies on in developing policies and regulations because 
of the cost of complying with the law.

"The quality of the agency's work would be compromised if that work 
relies on a significantly smaller collection of scientific studies," the 
analysis found.

This approach would undermine the nation's scientific credibility. ...
[more 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/opinion/pruitt-attack-science-epa.html]
---
[send this link to your representatives]
*Health Effects Institute <https://www.healtheffects.org/>*
We provide high-quality, trusted science for cleaner air and better 
health. Read more about our research mission and unique model of equal 
partnership by government and industry.
HEI is a nonprofit corporation chartered in 1980 as an independent 
research organization to provide high-quality, impartial, and relevant 
science on the health effects of air pollution. HEI typically receives 
balanced funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the 
worldwide motor vehicle industry. Other public and private organizations 
periodically support special projects or certain research programs.
To accomplish its mission, HEI
Identifies the highest priority areas for health effects research;
Competitively funds and oversees the conduct of research projects;
Provides intensive independent review of HEI-supported and related research;
Integrates HEI's research results with those of other institutions into 
broader evaluations; and
Communicates the results of HEI research and analyses to public and 
private decision makers.
Ongoing Research 
<https://www.healtheffects.org/research/ongoing-research> 
https://www.healtheffects.org/research/ongoing-research
Low levels of air pollution
Traffic-related air pollution: exposure and health
Non-tailpipe emissions and exposures near roadways and in tunnels
Effectiveness of air quality interventions (Accountability)
Mechanistic studies of air pollution and health
Rosenblith Award New Investigators
Statistical methods development
https://www.healtheffects.org/


[spectacular views of ice science in Greenland - must see]
(show off your large screen monitor)
*ICE ALIVE - Documenting Life and Rapid Change 
<https://youtu.be/okafyLzGvcw>*
Climate State
Published on Apr 10, 2018
Joseph Cook is taking a closer look at the microbial life that can be 
found all over the planet's glaciers and ice sheets. It is increasingly 
clear that this rich ecosystem affects the melt rates of polar ice and 
snow and could be accelerating climate change. Narrated by Jim 
Al-Khalili and starring Chris Hadfield.
YouTube
https://youtu.be/okafyLzGvcw
Vimeo
https://vimeo.com/258993236


[ A forest is a person ]
*Colombian government ordered to protect Amazon rainforest in historic 
legal ruling 
<https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rainforest-colombia-protect-deforestation-environment-logging-supreme-court-legal-rights-a8292671.html>*
'Supreme Court's decision marks a precedent in terms of climate change 
litigation'
Peter Stubley
The Colombian government has been ordered to take urgent action to 
protect the Amazon rainforest by its own supreme court.
In a historic ruling, the country's most senior judges said the state 
had not done enough to tackle the destruction of the environment.
The court recognised the Amazon as an "entity subject of rights" - 
meaning it has the same legal rights as a human being - and ordered 
action plans to be drawn up within four months.
"It is clear, despite numerous international commitments, regulations 
... that the Colombian state has not efficiently addressed the problem 
of deforestation in the Amazon," the supreme court said.
Colombia's rainforest covers an area roughly the size of Germany and 
England combined but is slowly being destroyed by farming, agriculture, 
cocaine production, illegal mining and logging...
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rainforest-colombia-protect-deforestation-environment-logging-supreme-court-legal-rights-a8292671.html


[Banking on the future!]
*Banking on Sunshine: World Added Far More Solar Than Fossil Fuel Power 
Generating Capacity in 2017 <http://fs-unep-centre.org/>*
China leads with more than half of world's new solar capacity
Global solar investment jumps 18 percent to $160.8 billion
Cumulative renewable energy investment since 2004: $2.9 trillion
Frankfurt/Nairobi, 5 April 2018 - Solar energy dominated global 
investment in new power generation like never before in 2017. The world 
installed a record 98 gigawatts of new solar capacity, far more than the 
net additions of any other technology - renewable, fossil fuel or nuclear.
The 12th Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2018 report, 
released on 5 April 2018 by Frankfurt School - UNEP Collaborating 
Centre, UN Environment, and Bloomberg New Energy Finance, finds that 
falling costs for solar electricity, and to some extent wind power, is 
continuing to drive deployment. Last year was the eighth in a row in 
which global investment in renewables (exclude large hydro) exceeded 
$200 billion - and since 2004, the world has invested $2.9 trillion in 
these green energy sources.
http://fs-unep-centre.org/


[Change analysis]
*The Future of Humanity, Malcolm Gladwell - WGS 2018 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leRRAvnDc6s>*
World Government Summit
Published on Mar 1, 2018
"There has been a dramatic shift in the nature of what people want and 
need from their governments." - Malcolm Gladwell, Globally Renowned Author
The world has changed fundamentally, according to the author Malcolm 
Gladwell, from one in which problems are puzzles to one in which they 
are, instead, mysteries. Using terminology developed by an intelligence 
official, Gregory Treverton, Gladwell said this distinction often 
centres on the amount of information available. In the past it was often 
about having too little data - a puzzle; in today's world too much data 
is more likely to be the issue - a mystery. To take education as an 
example, today a wealth of data on how teachers perform is available, 
including on such complex is-sues as how a particular teacher's methods 
interact with the capabilities of an individual student. Similar issues 
affect fields as diverse as defense and health care. This places 
challenges on institutions such as governments, because many developed 
their ways of operating in the 19th or even the 18th century. They are 
equipped to solve puzzles, not mysteries.
https://youtu.be/leRRAvnDc6s


[This is a consensus-based report ]
*Major Report Paints Grim Picture of Biodiversity 
<https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/major-report-paints-grim-picture-biodiversity>*
Last month the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity 
and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) released the first summaries of five 
reports 
<https://www.ipbes.net/news/media-release-biodiversity-nature%E2%80%99s-contributions-continue-%C2%A0dangerous-decline-scientists-warn> 
on global biodiversity, outlining the current state of plants, animal, 
and land health across the globe. A series of science reports may sound 
like a dry, academic exercise-and to some extent they are-but this 
massive work involving 550 authors from 100 countries compiled over 
three years is a major event in the history of conservation. For the 
first time, baseline hard science data on biodiversity has been gathered 
and analyzed in one place.
The goal is to give policy makers, conservationists, industry, and the 
public the information they need to save the biodiversity that's left 
and to restore what humanity has broken.
https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/major-report-paints-grim-picture-biodiversity
---
[Authored by member nations.]
*Human well-being at risk. Landmark reports highlight options to protect 
and restore nature and its vital contributions to people 
<https://www.ipbes.net/news/media-release-biodiversity-nature%E2%80%99s-contributions-continue-%C2%A0dangerous-decline-scientists-warn>*
Declining Biodiversity - Now and in the Future
*The Americas*
"In the Americas, rich biodiversity makes an immense contribution to the 
quality of life, helping to reduce poverty while strengthening economies 
and livelihoods," said Dr. Jake Rice (Canada), co-chair of the Americas 
assessment with Dr. Cristiana Simao Seixas (Brazil) and Prof. Maria 
Elena Zaccagnini (Argentina).
"The economic value of the Americas' land-based nature's contributions 
to people is estimated to be more than US$24 trillion per year - 
equivalent to the region's GDP, yet almost two-thirds - 65% - of these 
contributions are in decline, with 21% declining strongly. Human-induced 
climate change, which affects temperature, precipitation and the nature 
of extreme events, is increasingly driving biodiversity loss and the 
reduction of nature's contributions to people, worsening the impact of 
habitat degradation, pollution, invasive species and the 
overexploitation of natural resources."
According to the report, under a 'business as usual' scenario, climate 
change will be the fastest growing driver negatively impacting 
biodiversity by 2050 in the Americas, becoming comparable to the 
pressures imposed by land use change. On average today, the populations 
of species in an area are about 31% smaller than was the case at the 
time of European settlement. With the growing effects of climate change 
added to the other drivers, this loss is projected to reach 40% by 2050.
The report highlights the fact that indigenous people and local 
communities have created a diversity of polyculture and agroforestry 
systems, which have increased biodiversity and shaped landscapes. 
However, the decoupling of lifestyles from the local environment has 
eroded, for many, their sense of place, language and indigenous local 
knowledge. More than 60% of the languages in the Americas, and the 
cultures associated with them, are troubled or dying out....
more at: 
https://www.ipbes.net/news/media-release-biodiversity-nature%E2%80%99s-contributions-continue-%C2%A0dangerous-decline-scientists-warn


[March 2015]
*Climate denial is immoral, says head of US Episcopal church 
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/mar/24/climate-change-denial-immoral-says-head-episcopal-church>*
Climate change is a moral challenge threatening the rights of the 
world's poorest people and those who deny it are not using God's gift of 
knowledge, says presiding bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori
"It is in that sense much like the civil rights movement in this country 
where we are attending to the rights of all people and the rights of the 
earth to continue to be a flourishing place," Bishop Jefferts Schori 
said in an interview with the Guardian. "It is certainly a moral issue 
in terms of the impacts on the poorest and most vulnerable around the 
world already."
In the same context, Jefferts Schori attached moral implications to 
climate denial, suggesting those who reject the underlying science of 
climate change were turning their backs on God's gift of knowledge.
It's hard work when you have a climate denier who will not see the 
reality of scientific truth.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/mar/24/climate-change-denial-immoral-says-head-episcopal-church


*This Day in Climate History - April 11, 2010 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/11/magazine/11Economy-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&> 
   -  from D.R. Tucker*
April 11, 2010: In the New York Times Magazine, Paul Krugman observes:

    "If you listen to climate scientists — and despite the relentless
    campaign to discredit their work, you should — it is long past time
    to do something about emissions of carbon dioxide and other
    greenhouse gases. If we continue with business as usual, they say,
    we are facing a rise in global temperatures that will be little
    short of apocalyptic. And to avoid that apocalypse, we have to wean
    our economy from the use of fossil fuels, coal above all.

    "But is it possible to make drastic cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions
    without destroying our economy?

    "Like the debate over climate change itself, the debate over climate
    economics looks very different from the inside than it often does in
    popular media. The casual reader might have the impression that
    there are real doubts about whether emissions can be reduced without
    inflicting severe damage on the economy. In fact, once you filter
    out the noise generated by special-interest groups, you discover
    that there is widespread agreement among environmental economists
    that a market-based program to deal with the threat of climate
    change — one that limits carbon emissions by putting a price on them
    — can achieve large results at modest, though not trivial, cost."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/11/magazine/11Economy-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
//Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
//
/https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote//
///
///To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
/to news digest. /

        *** Privacy and Security: * This is a text-only mailing that
        carries no images which may originate from remote servers.
        Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
        sender.
        By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
        democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
        commercial purposes.
        To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject: 
        subscribe,  To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
        Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
        https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
        Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
        http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
        citizens and responsible governments of all levels.   List
        membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
        restricted to this mailing list.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20180411/87972dce/attachment.html>


More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list