[TheClimate.Vote] June 21, 2018 - Daily Global Warming News Digest

Richard Pauli richard at theclimate.vote
Thu Jun 21 09:44:11 EDT 2018


/June 21, 2018/

[Summer solstice for TV]
*Global warming, now brought to you by your local TV weathercaster 
<https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/global-warming-now-brought-you-your-local-tv-weathercaster-n884831>*
Local weathercasters have become one of the primary conduits for news on 
global warming. One nonprofit helped push the change.
Steve LaPointe has been a television weatherman for nearly three 
decades, and for most of his career, he didn't focus much on global 
warming. He was skeptical about the science behind it, particularly the 
notion that human behavior was heating the planet.
But the issue wouldn't go away. So LaPointe began to do "a lot of 
homework," he said, reading research papers and consulting fellow 
meteorologists, who connected him with a nonprofit, Climate Central 
<http://www.climatecentral.org/>, that spreads information on climate 
change.
LaPointe increasingly came to realize he was wrong - that the evidence 
that greenhouse gases are warming the Earth is "irrefutable." Now, 
LaPointe routinely reports on the effects of climate change - from the 
escalated growth of poison ivy to a jump in the number of high-pollen 
days - alongside his usual seven-day nightly forecasts on CBS affiliate 
WRGB in Albany, New York.
"It's just scientific fact. And the more it gets talked about, the more 
it's normalized," LaPointe said. "It gets into people's heads and it's 
not this political albatross that it could be."
- - - - -
While 70 percent of Americans now accept that global warming is 
occurring, and 58 percent agree that it is mostly caused by human 
activities, most people still don't express urgency about the problem. 
It's not listed as a pressing issue by most voters and just 39 percent 
believe that climate change is causing harm right now, according to a 
March George Mason 
<http://www.unkochmycampus.org/george-mason-university-media/> survey of 
1,278 adults.
"To most people this is distant in time, distant in space, distant in 
species," said Susan Hassol, who has been working in climate 
communications for three decades. "We say, 'No, it's about us, and it's 
local, and it's happening right now.'"
- - - -
LaPointe said he has run into no opposition as he has increasingly 
folded climate reporting into his weather forecasts, including from the 
Sinclair Broadcast Group, the conservative-leaning company that owns his 
upstate New York station. "There is zero pushback. Nobody has said 'You 
can't do this.' Nobody has said 'You cannot say this,'" LaPointe said.
"This is all based on science and on fact," LaPointe added, "and on the 
idea that it can help us to make better decisions and elect better 
people and implement the policy changes we need to turn this thing around."
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/global-warming-now-brought-you-your-local-tv-weathercaster-n884831
- - - -
[Thank you George Mason -  and earlier this year, AP told of skeleton in 
the closet]
*Documents show ties between university, conservative donors 
<https://apnews.com/0c87e4318bcc4eb9b8e69f9f54c7b889/Documents-show-ties-between-university,-conservative-donors>*
FAIRFAX, Va. (AP) - Virginia's largest public university granted the 
conservative Charles Koch Foundation a say in the hiring and firing of 
professors in exchange for millions of dollars in donations, according 
to newly released documents.
The release of donor agreements between George Mason University and the 
foundation follows years of denials by university administrators that 
Koch foundation donations inhibit academic freedom.
University President Angel Cabrera wrote a note to faculty Friday night 
saying the agreements "fall short of the standards of academic 
independence I expect any gift to meet." The admission came three days 
after a judge scrutinized the university's earlier refusal to release 
any documents.
https://apnews.com/0c87e4318bcc4eb9b8e69f9f54c7b889/Documents-show-ties-between-university,-conservative-donors
- - - -
[Zombie on campus]
*George Mason University - UnKoch My Campus 
<http://www.unkochmycampus.org/george-mason-university-media/>*
www.unkochmycampus.org/george-mason-university-media/
George Mason University in Virginia, just 20 miles from Washington D.C., 
is ground zero for Koch influence in higher education...
- - - -
Since August of 2014, students have been requesting access to the gift 
agreements, grand agreements, and MOUs that George Mason University has 
with the Charles Koch Foundation, but they have been repeatedly denied. 
The lack of transparency at GMU makes students believe their university 
is more interested in hiding their relationship with the Charles Koch 
Foundation than being held responsible to their students and the 
university community.
Students started researching Koch influence on campus in 2012...
http://www.unkochmycampus.org/george-mason-university-media/


[NPR video]
*Ben Strauss on Antarctic Ice Melt with PBS NewsHour 
<https://youtu.be/u5_zreSBgZc>*
Published on Jun 18, 2018
Our CEO and chief scientist Ben Strauss went on air with Hari 
Sreenivasen of PBS NewsHour to talk through a new study on Antarctic ice 
melt and what that may mean for coastal cities in the U.S. - 
particularly on the East Coast. "South Florida is severely at risk 
particularly because their bedrock is porous. So even if you built 
levees or protected walls, water would push underneath them come up 
through the ground. So there are really high stakes here."
Antarctica, a continent of snow and ice, is now losing ice three times 
faster than it was in 2007. In a new study published last week in the 
journal Nature, more than 80 scientists from multiple countries use 
satellite data to examine the Antarctic's vast ice sheets, and their 
prediction is that if the current rate of ice melt continues, sea levels 
could rise six inches by the year 2100.
https://youtu.be/u5_zreSBgZc

*
Explainer: How scientists estimate 'climate sensitivity' 
<https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-how-scientists-estimate-climate-sensitivity>*
CLIMATE SENSITIVITY - 19 June 2018
Climate sensitivity is an important scientific uncertainty, and 
narrowing the range could have significant consequences. One economic 
study <http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/373/2054/20140429> 
by Dr Chris Hope 
<https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/faculty-research/faculty-a-z/chris-hope/> at 
the University of Cambridge suggests that the value of halving the 
uncertainty may be in the trillions of dollars, as it would allow the 
amount and speed of emissions reductions needed to be better determined.
Yet the world would still need to decarbonise to meet the goals of the 
Paris Agreement 
<https://www.carbonbrief.org/interactive-the-paris-agreement-on-climate-change>, 
even if sensitivity is better understood or even at the low end of 
current estimates. An ECS of closer to 2C would only extend the deadline 
for reaching net-zero emissions by a decade or so, according to a study 
<http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/031003/meta> by 
IIASA's Dr Joeri Rogelj 
<http://www.iiasa.ac.at/staff/staff.php?type=auto&visibility=visible&search=true&login=rogelj> 
and colleagues.
The uncertainty also cuts both ways; there are just as many new studies 
being published today suggesting that sensitivity might be on the high 
end of the 1.5C to 4.5C range as there on the low end. Knutti and 
colleagues <https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo3017> suggest that the 
uncertainty in climate sensitivity should not be seen as a roadblock for 
action today. Dessler tells Carbon Brief:

    "Unless climate sensitivity falls outside the IPCC's range, I don't
    see that refinements to the range have a huge impact on what we
    should be doing from a policy perspective. We should be trying to
    reduce emissions as fast as we can – but slow enough not to be too
    disruptive to the economy."

Ultimately, just how warm the world will be in 2100 depends as much or 
more on the amount of CO2 and other greenhouse gases emitted into the 
atmosphere than on the precise value for climate sensitivity.
https://www.carbonbrief.org/climate-sensitivity-is-unlikely-to-be-less-than-2c-say-scientists


[letter to Chicago Tribune]
*Letter: The Midwest's rude awakening: It isn't immune from climate 
change. 
<http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/letters/ct-letters-flooding-michigan-wisconsin-climate-change-20180620-story.html>*
Minnesota and Northern Wisconsin and Michigan are getting most of the 
press, but it looks as if a hurricane struck much of the Upper Midwest. 
I drove to Chicago last week, passing mile after mile of flooded farm 
fields and stunted corn and wondering how farmers will get through this. 
In Madison, trees are down and streets are flooded. A torrent of water 
carried large rocks against the underground parking garage where I live, 
smashing the door, flooding the garage above hub-cap level, and shorting 
out the elevators...
- - - -
We broke the climate and everyone must do all they can to stop making 
things worse. We can no longer afford complacency, denial, or our 
fossil-fuel habit. Many businesses and state and local governments are 
climate heroes, but they can't carry the burden for all of us. As 
individuals, we can reduce our own carbon footprint. We can become 
active in one or more of the groups addressing various aspects of 
climate change or energy policy. We can thank and do business with 
companies that are "going green" and deny our business and investments 
to companies that aren't. We can prioritize climate when we vote and let 
candidates know we expect effective climate action from them, such as a 
price on carbon pollution commensurate with its long-deferred social, 
environmental, and economic costs. We can talk about the existential 
threat of climate change to anyone who will listen. There's a role for 
each of us, no matter what our strengths or weaknesses.
It's time to be scared - but scared into serious action, not into paralysis.
- Carol Steinhart, Madison, Wis.
email letters at chicagotribune.com
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/letters/ct-letters-flooding-michigan-wisconsin-climate-change-20180620-story.html


[Miami: The Invading Sea project]
*Climate change puts South Floridians' health at risk 
<http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article213562579.html>*
BY JULIO FRENK - June 20, 2018 07:52 PM
Today is the first day of summer, and in South Florida that means warmer 
temperatures, rain and mosquitoes. Just two years ago, mosquitoes 
carrying the Zika virus were first identified in Wynwood before 
spreading across Florida.
Vector-borne diseases such as Zika, dengue and chikungunya are 
re-emerging because temperatures are rising. As the planet warms, 
habitats that support mosquito vectors expand, allowing these diseases 
to spread faster and further beyond neighborhood, state and national 
borders.
Climate change has also sparked extreme weather events, which can spur a 
rise in illnesses. Hurricane Harvey showed us that standing water and 
flooding from slower and wetter storms can create breeding grounds for 
water-borne diseases. As we know all too well, hurricanes can also cause 
damage to vital infrastructure, making it more difficult to contain 
outbreaks.
Droughts, disruptions in seasons and extreme temperatures put pressure 
on food production and can cause food insecurity for entire communities. 
The risk of famine and illness brought by malnutrition increases. 
Malnourishment makes it more difficult to recover from infections that 
are otherwise easily treatable, like lower respiratory tract infections 
and diarrhea.
Similarly, rising seas threaten our supply of drinking water. This is 
especially true in South Florida, as we get much of our water from 
underground aquifers that are at risk of salt-water intrusion. 
Contaminated water can result in severe illness, and salt-water 
intrusion in the aquifers threatens a most fundamental element needed to 
maintain a healthy population and a thriving economy.
The findings are clear: Climate change poses a direct and grave risk to 
our health. This is why we must act. The need for water and food does 
not ascribe to a particular ideology. Mosquitoes carrying disease do not 
differentiate between political parties. That is why The Invading Sea 
<https://www.theinvadingsea.com/>project by the Miami Herald, South 
Florida Sun Sentinel, Palm Beach Post, and WLRN is so impressive. This 
unique media collaboration is shining a bright light on sea level rise 
in our communities and is fostering conversation and debate that 
otherwise would not occur...
http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article213562579.html
- - - - -
[Media organizing]
*The Invading Sea <https://www.theinvadingsea.com/>* is a collaboration 
by the editorial boards of the South Florida Sun Sentinel, Miami Herald 
and Palm Beach Post - with reporting by WLRN Public Media - to address 
the threat South Florida faces from sea-level rise
We plan to use our collective voice to communicate in drumbeat fashion 
the undeniable and unrelenting threat we face, help people see what's at 
stake and engage experts, citizens, businesses and political leaders on 
the tough choices ahead.
The time is right for our project because this is a big election year in 
Florida - for the U.S. Senate, for the Governor's Mansion, all four 
seats on the Florida Cabinet and the Florida Legislature.
Our three editorial boards plan to ask all the candidates about sea 
level rise: What are we going to do? Who's going to decide? And who's 
going to pay?
We want to raise awareness, amplify the voice of our region and create a 
call to action that can't be ignored.
WLRN, meanwhile, plans an in-depth series of reports, roundtable 
discussions and other community engagement events.
*If you have comments or suggestions about "The Invading Sea," contact 
one of these people:*

    Project editor Tom O'Hara
    thomasohara043 at gmail.com
    304-704-2901

    Miami Herald Editorial Page Editor Nancy Ancrum
    nancrum at miamiherald.com
    305-376-3517

    Rosemary O'Hara
    Sun Sentinel Editorial Page Editor
    rohara at sun-sentinel.com
    954-356-4669

    Palm Beach Post Editorial Page Editor Rick Christie
    rchristie at pbpost.com
    561-820-4476

    WLRN Vice President of News Tom Hudson
    thudson at wlrnnews.org
    305-995-1717

    Sun Sentinel Newsroom Product Engineer Danny Sanchez
    dsanchez at sun-sentinel.com
    954-356-4818

https://www.theinvadingsea.com/


[Academics agree]
*Climate-induced conflict or Hospice Earth: the increasing importance of 
eco-socialism 
<https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14781158.2015.1019442?journalCode=cpar20>*
John Barkdull and Paul G. Harris
24 Mar 2015
Download citation https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2015.1019442
Abstract
What are the implications of global climate change for peace and human 
welfare in the future? The answer depends on the actual effects of 
climate change and how the world responds to them. Current economic and 
political systems are unlikely to produce the policy and institutional 
changes needed to reduce adequately the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions 
causing the problem, so some of the most dangerous effects of climate 
change could occur this century. Some observers posit that climate 
change will result in catastrophe, but specifics of this catastrophe 
range widely. Does climate change mean painful but manageable social 
disruption, requiring, for instance, populations to move and cities to 
be rebuilt? Or does climate change portend much worse, including major 
wars, the end of modern civilization or, incredibly, even the eventual 
extinction of humanity? If these more severe consequences are likely or 
possible, what kind of global society would be best able to survive, or 
at least cope? The answer may be found in eco-socialism and a 'Hospice 
Earth' that nurtures people and societies regardless of how bad the 
future becomes.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14781158.2015.1019442?journalCode=cpar20


*This Day in Climate History - June 21, 2010 
<June%2021,%202010:%20In%20the%20New%20Republic,%20Brad%20Plumer%20writes%20that%20if%20the%20Senate%20can%27t%20pass%20cap-and-trade,%20the%20EPA%20should%20move%20ahead%20with%20regulating%20carbon%20emissions.%20He%20further%20observes:,,%22In%20the%20long%20term,%20though,+we%27d+really+need+a+price+on+carbon+to+transform+the+country%27s+energy+sector+and+give+people+incentive+to+develop+new+clean-energy+technologies%E2%80%94having+the+EPA+just+flatly+tell+polluters+that+they+have+to+adopt+this+or+that+specific+pollution-cutting+gizmo+isn%27t+very+good+for+innovation.+But+hey,%20maybe%20a%20few%20years%20from%20now%20we%27ll%20have%20a%20Congress%20that%27s%20ready%20to%20address%20this%20problem.%20Odder%20things%20have%20happened.%22,,http://www.newrepublic.com/blog/the-vine/75723/leaving-global-warming-the-bureaucrats> 
- from D.R. Tucker*
June 21, 2010: In the New Republic, Brad Plumer writes that if the 
Senate can't pass cap-and-trade, the EPA should move ahead with 
regulating carbon emissions. He further observes:

    "In the long term, though, we'd really need a price on carbon to
    transform the country's energy sector and give people incentive to
    develop new clean-energy technologies—having the EPA just flatly
    tell polluters that they have to adopt this or that specific
    pollution-cutting gizmo isn't very good for innovation. But hey,
    maybe a few years from now we'll have a Congress that's ready to
    address this problem. Odder things have happened."

http://www.newrepublic.com/blog/the-vine/75723/leaving-global-warming-the-bureaucrats

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
//Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
//
/https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote//
///
///To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
/to news digest. /

        *** Privacy and Security: * This is a text-only mailing that
        carries no images which may originate from remote servers.
        Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
        sender.
        By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
        democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
        commercial purposes.
        To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject: 
        subscribe,  To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
        Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
        https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
        Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
        http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
        citizens and responsible governments of all levels.   List
        membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
        restricted to this mailing list.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20180621/23cb701a/attachment.html>


More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list