[TheClimate.Vote] May 30, 2018 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Wed May 30 11:58:59 EDT 2018
/May 30, 2018/
[more like 5,740]
*Revised Death Count Makes Hurricane Maria Deadliest Storm in Modern US
History
<https://earther.com/revised-death-count-makes-hurricane-maria-deadliest-sto-1826388347>*
Brian Kahn
The official death count for Hurricane Maria stands at 64 in Puerto
Rico. New research shows that number is hugely flawed, and that the real
death toll could be up to 70 times higher. The revised count would make
Maria the deadliest storm in modern U.S. history.
The Puerto Rican government has been criticized for its shoddy approach
to counting the number of dead
<https://earther.com/the-official-death-toll-from-hurricane-maria-continues-1820883248#_ga=2.205606869.712618560.1527475521-r9fv0q1wh>
from Hurricane Maria. Numerous other groups and news organizations have
made estimates using different techniques. But research published on
Tuesday in the New England Journal of Medicine
<https://go.redirectingat.com/?id=33330X1570722&xs=1&isjs=1&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nejm.org%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1056%2FNEJMsa1803972%3Fquery%3Dfeatured_home&xguid=5dcb6522d68a91a3748a34835a030aa1&xuuid=4a4cdc77546f4860e5fa31e7630a54d8&xsessid=e6d8ab9b3c914f2103cab7e7ff5ddf3f&xcreo=0&xed=0&sref=https%3A%2F%2Fearther.com%2Frevised-death-count-makes-hurricane-maria-deadliest-sto-1826388347&pref=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.google.com%2F&xtz=420&jv=13.4.1&bv=2.5.1>
represents one of the most comprehensive studies to date.
The researchers surveyed an on-the-ground sample of nearly 3,300
households across the island from after Maria struck on September 20
through December 31, 2017. They asked people about their experience in
the wake of the storm, including their access to electricity, clean
water, healthcare, and other services in addition to whether there were
any deaths in their household.
Using that sample, they then extrapolated a death count for the
territory as a whole, and compared it to the same period in 2016. The
findings show there were an estimated 4,645 excess deaths in the three
months following Maria compared to 2016, more than the total number of
U.S. soldiers killed in the Iraq War. The researchers also noted that
the number could be 5,740 when factoring in single-person households
where the individual had died.
https://earther.com/revised-death-count-makes-hurricane-maria-deadliest-sto-1826388347
[opinion]
*Trump administration refuses to consider that 97% of climate scientists
could be right
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/may/29/trump-administration-refuses-to-consider-that-97-of-climate-scientists-could-be-right>*
Even though smart climate policies could save tens of trillions of dollars
Last week, the Washington Post obtained a White House internal memo that
debated how the Trump administration should handle federal climate
science reports.
The memo presented three options without endorsing any of them:
conducting a "red team/blue team" exercise to "highlight
uncertainties in climate science"; more formally reviewing the
science under the Administrative Procedure Act; or deciding to just
"ignore, and not seek to characterize or question, the science being
conducted by Federal agencies and outside entities."
In short, the White House considered 'debating' established climate
science, casting doubt on scientists' conclusions, or just ignoring
them. Accepting and/or acting on the findings of the scientific experts
is not an option they're willing to consider.
Katharine Hayhoe
@KHayhoe
So according to this memo, the administration considered 3 options--
(1) framing reality as being up for debate;
(2) developing their own view of reality; or
(3) ignoring reality--and went with option 3.
Interesting that "accepting reality" was not an option.
https://twitter.com/citizensclimate/status/999372364575014913 …
- - - -
There's a 97% expert consensus that humans are causing global warming,
and the scientific research is clear that the consequences of continued
rapid climate change could be devastating for the economy and for all
species on Earth.
The case for the Trump administration approach - ignoring and casting
doubt on the conclusions of climate science experts - is that of a bad
gambler. It's not a 100% consensus; maybe the less than 3% of climate
contrarians are onto something. Perhaps the experts are wrong and
climate change won't be so bad.
If the stakes were something inconsequential like a Trump steak, that
would be fine, but it should go without saying that betting the future
of humanity and life on Earth on a less than 3% long shot is a bad idea.
The stakes could not be higher. Prudent risk management dictates that we
should be taking serious steps to mitigate the chances of such a
disastrous outcome. That's why Americans buy home and auto and health
insurance. It's why fewer than 17% of Americans today are smokers, down
from 42% in 1965.
- - - -
*Saving the Republican Party*
Not only is global warming denial terrible policy, but it's bad for the
long-term health of the Republican Party. There's a climate change
generation gap - most young Americans realize that humans are causing
global warming, and young conservatives want their leaders to do
something about it. Climate change impacts will only become more severe
over time, and today's youth know that they'll have to live with the
consequences of our actions today. They simply can't afford denial, and
the GOP risks losing these voters forever by willfully ignoring the
problem that poses an existential threat to young Americans.
There are a few glimmers of hope in the party. Trump's new Nasa
administrator now accepts climate science. Eight House Republicans
signed a letter to leaders of the Appropriations Committee urging them
to reject any provisions in the 2019 spending bill that would undermine
efforts to combat climate change. The conservative Climate Leadership
Council proposed a free market, small government, revenue-neutral carbon
tax ready to go as soon as the GOP can elect a leadership that's willing
to make a great climate change deal.
But right now the GOP is still stuck being, as Governor Bobby Jindal
(R-LA) described it five years ago, "the stupid party." Its leadership
won't even consider the possibility that 97% of climate science experts
are right. That denial is going to be very expensive, and as Americans
increasingly accept the realities of climate change, it will also land
the GOP on the endangered species list.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/may/29/trump-administration-refuses-to-consider-that-97-of-climate-scientists-could-be-right
[World ready]
*Responsibility To Prepare
<https://climateandsecurity.org/responsibilitytoprepare/>*
Launch Report: "A Responsibility To Prepare: Governing in an Age of
Unprecedented Risk and Unprecedented Foresight," August 7, 2017
Caitlin Werrell, Francesco Femia, Sherri Goodman, Shiloh Fetzek, The
Center for Climate and Security
[World - UN Security Council]
*Werrell_UNSCBriefing to the UN Security Council: "A Responsibility to
Prepare,*" <https://climateandsecurity.org/responsibilitytoprepare/>
December 15, 2017, Caitlin Werrell, The Center for Climate and Security
Video
<http://webtv.un.org/watch/fl-security-council-arria-formula-climate-change-and-security/5681754905001>
http://webtv.un.org/watch/fl-security-council-arria-formula-climate-change-and-security/5681754905001
Prepared remarks
Summary: The world in the 21st century is characterized by both
unprecedented risks and unprecedented foresight. Climate change,
population shifts and cyber-threats are rapidly increasing the scale
and complexity of risks to international security, while
technological developments are increasing our capacity to foresee
those risks. This world of high consequence risks, which can be
better modeled and anticipated than in the past, underscores a clear
responsibility for the international community: A "Responsibility to
Prepare." This responsibility, which builds on hard-won lessons of
the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) framework for preventing and
responding to mass atrocities, requires a reform of existing
governance institutions to ensure that critical, nontraditional
risks to international security, such as climate change, are
anticipated, analyzed and addressed systematically, robustly and
rapidly by intergovernmental security institutions and the security
establishments of nations that participate in that system.
A Responsibility to Prepare agenda should be developed and adopted by
all nations, while adhering to the overarching principle of
"climate-proofing" security institutions at the international, regional
and national levels. That climate-proofing would include routinizing,
integrating, institutionalizing and elevating attention to climate and
security issues at these bodies, as well as establishing rapid response
mechanisms, and developing contingencies for potential unintended
consequences.
Such an agenda - focused as it is on reforming security institutions -
would ensure that critical nontraditional challenges, such as climate
change, are appropriately managed as global security risks, rather than
as niche concerns. A practical fulfillment of the goals and principles
articulated in this Responsibility to Prepare framework would increase
the likelihood of more stable governance in the face of rapid but
foreseeable change.
The Climate and Security Advisory Group (CSAG): "A Responsibility to
Prepare - Strengthening National and Homeland Security in the Face of a
Changing Climate"
<https://climateandsecurity.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/climate-and-security-advisory-group_a-responsibility-to-prepare_2018_02.pdf>
The CSAG, a voluntary, non-partisan group of 54 U.S.-based military,
national security, homeland security, intelligence and foreign policy
experts from a broad range of institutions, is chaired by the Center for
Climate and Security in partnership with the George Washington
University's Elliott School of International Affairs. On February 2018,
the group released a new roadmap and recommendations report calling on
the U.S. government to to follow the advice of Defense Secretary James
Mattis, who argued for a "whole-of-government response" to climate
change during his confirmation process.
The report notes that given the threats of climate change identified by
the defense, national security and intelligence communities, a rise in
destructive climate-driven impacts on the U.S., and an increased
capacity to foresee these risks, the U.S. government has a
"Responsibility to Prepare" to address these challenges at home and
abroad. Specifically, the group recommends that the Administration do so
through three lines of effort: Assess, Prepare, and Support.
https://climateandsecurity.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/climate-and-security-advisory-group_a-responsibility-to-prepare_2018_02.pdf
https://climateandsecurity.org/responsibilitytoprepare/
*
*[remaking reality]*
Kilauea Is Making Its Own Weather
<https://earther.com/kilauea-made-its-own-weather-1826395615>*
Brian Kahn
After blue flames
<https://earther.com/now-kilaueas-eruption-is-producing-wild-blue-flames-1826266419>,
towering ash clouds
<https://earther.com/kilauea-spews-ash-golf-continues-1826069099>, and
gurgling fountains of lava
<https://earther.com/kilaueas-lava-is-changing-heres-what-that-means-1826191264#_ga=2.231810972.262580706.1527597368-619078092.1521480267>,
the fourth horseman of the volcanic apocalypse has arrived at Kilauea:
Hawaii's most active volcano has created its own weather system.
The U.S Geological Survey (USGS) reported that billowing pyrocumulus
clouds are rising over Kilauea's angry eruption at Fissure 8 in the
Lower East Rift Zone on Monday.
Pyrocumulus clouds - also known as flammagenitus clouds - are most
commonly caused by wildfires. They form when heat from the ground,
whether from burning trees or scalding molten rock, causes the air
around it to warm and rise, carrying water vapor with it. As that air
reaches the cooler heights of the upper atmosphere, that water vapor
condenses around tiny particles like ash to form clouds. Those clouds
can become unstable and in turn cause thunderstorms.
https://earther.com/kilauea-made-its-own-weather-1826395615
[Goes around, comes around]
*Global warming, global trade means floods in China will likely harm US
economy*
<https://www.upi.com/Science_News/2018/05/29/Global-warming-global-trade-means-floods-in-China-will-likely-harm-US-economy/9141527539270/>
UPI.com
"Economic losses might be down-streamed along the global trade and
supply network affecting other economies on a global scale," said
researcher Sven Willner.
By Brooks Hays
May 28 (UPI) - New research suggests climate change is likely to cause
more frequent and more destructive flooding in China, triggering
economic losses at home and abroad - including the U.S. economy.
"Climate change will increase flood risks already in the next two
decades - and this is not only a problem for millions of people but also
for economies worldwide," Anders Levermann, researcher at the Potsdam
Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, said in a news release.
Levermann and his colleagues modeled flooding risk in China and its
effects on the economies of China's trade partners.
"Through supply shortages, changes in demand and associated price
signals, economic losses might be down-streamed along the global trade
and supply network affecting other economies on a global scale - we were
surprised about the size of this rather worrying effect," said Potsdam
researcher Sven Willner.
The researchers' models used algorithms designed to measure global risk
assessment for natural hazards, as well as algorithms inspired by
network theory. Together, the model's components helped scientists
understand how localized economic shocks propagate in time and space.
The simulations, detailed in the journal Nature Climate Change
<https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0173-2>, provided a reminder
that natural disasters can impact the entire global community...
https://www.upi.com/Science_News/2018/05/29/Global-warming-global-trade-means-floods-in-China-will-likely-harm-US-economy/9141527539270/
-
[Abstract]
*Global economic response to river floods
<https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0173-2>*
Sven Norman Willner, Christian Otto & Anders Levermann
Nature Climate Change (2018) | Download Citation
*Abstract*
Increasing Earth's surface air temperature yields an intensification
of its hydrological cycle1. As a consequence, the risk of river
floods will increase regionally within the next two decades due to
the atmospheric warming caused by past anthropogenic greenhouse gas
emissions2,3,4. The direct economic losses5,6 caused by these floods
can yield regionally heterogeneous losses and gains by propagation
within the global trade and supply network7. Here we show that, in
the absence of large-scale structural adaptation, the total economic
losses due to fluvial floods will increase in the next 20 years
globally by 17% despite partial compensation through market
adjustment within the global trade network. China will suffer the
strongest direct losses, with an increase of 82%. The United States
is mostly affected indirectly through its trade relations. By
contrast to the United States, recent intensification of the trade
relations with China leaves the European Union better prepared for
the import of production losses in the future.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0173-2
[taunt]
*Emails show climate change skeptics tout 'winning' under Trump
<http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/389713-emails-show-climate-skeptic-group-gloated-about-winning-under-trump>*
By John Bowden - 05/29/18
A conservative think tank that seeks to battle global warming "alarmism"
celebrated during President Trump
<http://thehill.com/people/donald-trump>'s first year in office,
according to correspondence obtained by a Freedom of Information Act
request.
Joe Bast, the co-founder of the Illinois-based Heartland Institute,
wrote to allies in January that 2017 had been "a great year for climate
realists" due to policies pursued by the Trump administration. The email
referred to the White House's efforts to direct federal agencies to
remove references to climate change from official documents.
"This is what victory looks like," he wrote in October when noting that
"global warming" wasn't mentioned in the EPA's strategic plan for
upcoming years.
"More winning, this time at FEMA," he added in March when the Federal
Emergency Management Agency cut references to climate change from its plans.
According to the released emails released by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Tuesday and first reported on by the trade
publication E&E News <https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060082811>, EPA
coordinated with Heartland to include climate change doubters in
meetings about accuracy and scientific integrity and is asking Trump
officials to appoint a committee designed to combat "the bias that
infected climate science and policymaking" under the Obama administration.
EPA released the emails following a lawsuit by The Southern
Environmental Law Center (SELC) and Environmental Defense Fund in March.
"EPA's efforts to promote climate change deniers and undermine
peer-reviewed science behind closed doors is not only a failure of its
mission, it is illegal," said Kym Hunter, Attorney for SELC at the time.
"The public has a clear and protected right to know what the EPA is
doing and with whom they are communicating, including those pushing a
climate-denier agenda."
Former Texas Rep. Tim Huelskamp
<http://thehill.com/people/tim-huelskamp> (R), who now leads the group,
told The Associated Press
<https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/emails-show-cooperation-epa-climate-change-deniers-55456407> that
the EPA recognizes his group as a "pre-eminent organization opposing the
radical climate alarmism agenda."
An EPA spokesperson told the AP that the agency works with the Heartland
Institute, among other organizations, "to ensure the public is informed."
An internal EPA memo leaked in March showed that the agency
<http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/380692-internal-epa-memo-tells-staffers-how-to-downplay-climate-change>
instructed staffers to balance evidence that links human beings to
climate change with "gaps" in the science.
"Human activity impacts our changing climate in some manner. The ability
to measure with precision the degree and extent of that impact, and what
to do about it, are subject to continuing debate and dialogue," reads
the memo, which says EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt
<http://thehill.com/people/edward-scott-pruitt> encourages an "open"
debate on climate science.
In April, the EPA said
<http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/356409-epa-removes-more-references-to-climate-change-from-its-website>
that updates to the website including those that removed references to
climate change "reflect the views of the leadership of the agency."
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/389713-emails-show-climate-skeptic-group-gloated-about-winning-under-trump
[new book from MITPress]
*Global Warming and the Sweetness of Life: A Tar Sands Tale
<https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/global-warming-and-sweetness-life>*
By Matt Hern and Am Johal
Seeking new definitions of ecology in the tar sands of northern Alberta
and searching for the sweetness of life in the face of planetary crises.
Summary
Seeking new definitions of ecology in the tar sands of northern
Alberta and searching for the sweetness of life in the face of
planetary crises.
Confounded by global warming and in search of an affirmative
politics that links ecology with social change, Matt Hern and Am
Johal set off on a series of road trips to the tar sands of northern
Alberta - perhaps the world's largest industrial site, dedicated to
the dirty work of extracting oil from Alberta's vast reserves.
Traveling from culturally liberal, self-consciously "green"
Vancouver, and aware that our well-meaning performances of recycling
and climate-justice marching are accompanied by constant driving,
flying, heating, and fossil-fuel consumption, Hern and Johal want to
talk to people whose lives and fortunes depend on or are imperiled
by extraction. They are seeking new definitions of ecology built on
a renovated politics of land. Traveling with them is their friend
Joe Sacco - infamous journalist and cartoonist, teller of complex
stories from Gaza to Paris - who contributes illustrations and
insights and a chapter-length comic about the contradictions of life
in an oil town. The epic scale of the ecological horror is captured
through an series of stunning color photos by award-winning aerial
photographer Louis Helbig.
Seamlessly combining travelogue, sophisticated political analysis,
and ecological theory, speaking both to local residents and to
leading scholars, the authors propose a new understanding of ecology
that links the domination of the other-than-human world to the
domination of humans by humans. They argue that any definition of
ecology has to start with decolonization and that confronting global
warming requires a politics that speaks to a different way of being
in the world - a reconstituted understanding of the sweetness of life.
Published with the help of funding from Furthermore: a program of the J.
M. Kaplan fund
https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/global-warming-and-sweetness-life
[Resilience]
*Sally Weintrobe on Nurturing Imagination amid a 'Culture of Uncare'
<https://www.resilience.org/stories/2018-05-29/sally-weintrobe-on-nurturing-imagination-amid-a-culture-of-uncare/>*
By Rob Hopkins, Rob Hopkins blog
For peoples' minds and imaginations to flower, they need two conditions.
They need to be able to love and to care for others and they need to be
cared about. I don't think this is said enough.
Sally Weintrobe is a psychoanalyst and a founder member of the Climate
Psychology Alliance. Her work is driven, in part, by a fascination with
denial around climate change, and around neoliberalism and its culture.
For Sally, you can't understand psychological reactions to climate
change without getting a handle first on the culture neoliberalism has
created, and in which we are all, to a greater or lesser extent,
implicated. I have been intrigued by her work and her thinking for some
time. She has written about what she calls 'the new imagination',
thinking that clearly overlaps with the explorations we've been having here.
It means a lot of things. The 'received wisdom' at the moment is
still that the way things are is the only way: that the economy
cannot be decarbonized and climate change cannot be addressed. I had
a very transformative experience in 2013 at a conference held at the
Royal Academy, called the Radical Reductions Emissions Conference. I
sat and listened for two days to speakers from around the world by
video conference all talking about how the low carbon economy can be
achieved. Energy, shipping, transport, you name it; it can be
achieved. I was absolutely amazed.
I realised that I had unconsciously picked up the attitude that it
can't be done. I was in the grip of a false idea that it can't be
done. Not only could it be done, but with existing technology. After
2013, interestingly, we saw the price of solar start to come down,
and the idea it could be done started permeating through. But a
cultural message that it cannot be done is still very strong. It
stifles the imagination.
The new imagination starts with an understanding that it can be done,
and with studying why on earth do we think it can't be done? That's
where culture comes in and there's much to say about the role of
neoliberal culture; its effects on our minds.
For peoples' minds and imaginations to flower, to flower, they need two
conditions. They need to be able to love and to care for others and they
need to be cared about. I don't think this is said enough.
https://www.resilience.org/stories/2018-05-29/sally-weintrobe-on-nurturing-imagination-amid-a-culture-of-uncare/
[Video Lessons for today: Climate Models]
*A Short Introduction to Climate Models - CMIP & CMIP6
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdRiYPJLt4o>*
World Climate Research Programme
Published on Jun 21, 2017
As part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) organized
under the auspices of the World Climate Research Programme's (WCRP)
Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) many hundreds of climate
researchers, working with modeling centres around the world, will share,
compare and analyze the latest outcomes of global climate models. These
model products will fuel climate research for the next 5 to 10 years,
while its careful analysis will form the basis for future climate
assessments and negotiations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdRiYPJLt4o
- - - -
*5.1 Introduction to Climate Modeling
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGi2a0tNjOo>*
Climate Literacy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGi2a0tNjOo
[U.S. Climate Resilience Toolkit]
*THE CLIMATE EXPLORER <https://toolkit.climate.gov/climate-explorer2/>*
Explore maps and graphs of historical and projected climate trends for
any county in the contiguous United States. View data by topics to see
how climate change will impact things you care about.
https://toolkit.climate.gov/climate-explorer2/
[Blog]
*Water Shortage In Pakistan: What Should Be Done?*
<https://blogs.dunyanews.tv/21746/>
<https://blogs.dunyanews.tv/21746/>DunyaNews Pakistan (blog)
Global warming had also brought climatic changes for the few years in
our country. This leads to less rainfall which causes the water shortage
in rivers ...
As we all know that our country is going through severe water shortage.
There are two main reasons for this, one is natural due to prolong
drought which is beyond the control of man and the other due to the
gross negligence in the development and mismanagement of water resources.
Global warming had also brought climatic changes for the few years in
our country. This leads to less rainfall which causes the water shortage
in rivers, lakes, and dams etc. Excess cutting of trees is equally
responsible as global warming for less rainfall.
Few years back, when the climatic conditions were normal and rainfalls
on time there were no resources to preserve water. If we had dams and
other resources at that time to preserve water, today we could easily be
able to cope up water shortage. However, it's not too late yet, if our
government derives its attention towards this matter we can stop this
matter from getting worst.
The other reason behind water shortage is mismanagement of water and its
usage. People are using the water irresponsibly without being aware of
future difficulties which occurs due to lack of water. People are doing
their day to day activities with open taps like brushing teeth, taking
bath, washing clothes etc. through which billions of gallons of water
get wasted...
https://blogs.dunyanews.tv/21746/
*This Day in Climate History - May 30, 2013
<https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-american-party_b_3358546> -
from D.R. Tucker*
May 30, 2013: In a controversial Huffington Post article, climate
scientist James Hansen suggests that neither Republicans nor Democrats
can be relied upon to combat carbon pollution in a market-based
manner. [updated Dec 6, 2017]
Footnote: A self-licking ice cream cone is a self-perpetuating system
with no purpose other than to sustain itself. The phrase was used first
in 1992 in On Self-Licking Ice Cream Cones, a paper by Pete Worden about
NASA’s bureaucracy.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-american-party_b_3358546
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
//Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
//
/https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote//
///
///To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
/to news digest. /
*** Privacy and Security: * This is a text-only mailing that
carries no images which may originate from remote servers.
Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject:
subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20180530/409082dd/attachment.html>
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list