[TheClimate.Vote] September 8, 2018 - Daily Global Warming News Digest

Richard Pauli richard at theclimate.vote
Sat Sep 8 11:53:41 EDT 2018


/September 8, 2018/

[Summer is not over]
*New Northern California Wildfire Erupts in Shasta County 
<https://www.democracynow.org/2018/9/7/headlines/new_northern_california_wildfire_erupts_in_shasta_county>*
SEPT 07, 2018 - H15 delta fire
In Northern California, a massive wildfire tripled in size overnight, 
amid high temperatures and dry conditions. The Delta Fire in Shasta 
County has consumed more than 34 square miles of trees and brush and 
forced the closure of Interstate 5, where some truck drivers abandoned 
their rigs to flee oncoming flames. The fire comes amid a record fire 
season in California that climate scientists say is likely exacerbated 
by global warming.
https://www.democracynow.org/2018/9/7/headlines/new_northern_california_wildfire_erupts_in_shasta_county


[Look for changes]
*BBC admits 'we get climate change coverage wrong too often' 
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/sep/07/bbc-we-get-climate-change-coverage-wrong-too-often>*
Briefing sent to editorial staff on global warming says 'you do not need 
a denier to balance the debate'
The BBC has accepted it gets coverage of climate change "wrong too 
often" and told staff: "You do not need a 'denier' to balance the debate."
In a briefing note sent to all staff warning them to be aware of false 
balance, the corporation has offered a training course on how to report 
on global warming. The move follows a series of apologies and censures 
for failing to challenge climate sceptics during interviews, including 
Nigel Lawson...
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/sep/07/bbc-we-get-climate-change-coverage-wrong-too-often
- - - -
[BBC internal course name: Reporting Climate Change (for News Teams)]
*BBC issues internal guidance on how to report climate change 
<https://www.carbonbrief.org/exclusive-bbc-issues-internal-guidance-on-how-to-report-climate-change>*
All of the BBC's editorial staff have also been invited to sign up for a 
one-hour "training course on reporting climate change". Carbon Brief 
understands *this is the first time that the BBC has issued formal 
reporting guidance to its staff on this topic.*
[Sample clip:]

    What's the BBC's position?
    *Man-made climate change exists:* If the science proves it we should
    report it. The BBC accepts that the best science on the issue is the
    IPCC's position, set out above.
    *Be aware of 'false balance':* As climate change is accepted as
    happening, you do not need a 'denier' to balance the debate.
    Although there are those who disagree with the IPCC's position, very
    few of them now go so far as to deny that climate change is
    happening. To achieve impartiality, you do not need to include
    outright deniers of climate change in BBC coverage, in the same way
    you would not have someone denying that Manchester United won 2-0
    last Saturday. The referee has spoken. However, the BBC does not
    exclude any shade of opinion from its output, and with appropriate
    challenge from a knowledgeable interviewer, there may be occasions
    to hear from a denier.
    *There are occasions where contrarians and sceptics should be
    included within climate change and sustainability debates*. These
    may include, for instance, debating the speed and intensity of what
    will happen in the future, or what policies government should adopt.
    Again, journalists need to be aware of the guest's viewpoint and how
    to challenge it effectively. As with all topics, we must make clear
    to the audience which organisation the speaker represents,
    potentially how that group is funded and whether they are speaking
    with authority from a scientific perspective – in short, making
    their affiliations and previously expressed opinions clear.

The document concludes with a list of "common misconceptions" produced 
by theScience Media Centre (SMC) 
<http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/about-us/>. The list appears to be an 
adapted update of a document (pdf) 
<http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/SMC-Briefing-Notes-Climate-Change.pdf> 
published by the SMC in 2012.
The SMC was established in 2002 and seeks to "provide, for the benefit 
of the public and policymakers, accurate and evidence-based information 
about science and engineering through the media, particularly on 
controversial and headline news stories when most confusion and 
misinformation occurs".
https://www.carbonbrief.org/exclusive-bbc-issues-internal-guidance-on-how-to-report-climate-change


[See the Elon Musk interview - about sustainable energy - video]
*Elon Musk tells Joe Rogan "Accelerate Transition to Clean Energy" 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxahB_AqC_0>*
Climate State
Published on Sep 7, 2018
Elon Musk is a business magnet, investor and engineer. Watch the full 
Joe Rogan Experience
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxahB_AqC_0


[Better watch out]
*On Environmental Record, Did Kavanaugh Lie to Senate? 
<https://www.ecowatch.com/did-kavanaugh-lie-to-senate-2602840127.html>*
By Scott Faber
In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday, Supreme 
Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh grossly misrepresented his record on the 
environment.
Kavanaugh, President Trump's nominee to fill the court's critical swing 
seat, cited four cases as evidence of his willingness to rule against 
industry to protect the environment.
But in one of those cases, Kavanaugh actually ruled in favor of 
weakening air quality rules for cement plants. In another, Kavanaugh 
doubled down on his position that the U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) lacks the legal authority to regulate the greenhouse gases 
that cause climate change. In a third case, Kavanaugh's concurring 
opinion laid the groundwork for challenges of EPA regulations by 
polluting industries.
What's more important are the cases he failed to mention. The fact is 
that in 16 of 18 cases, Kavanaugh has ruled in favor of more air and 
water pollution, and in 17 of 18 cases, he has ruled to weaken 
protection for endangered species.
So, when it comes to the environment, Judge Kavanaugh has ruled for 
industry 32 out of 35 times. That's good news for industry, but really 
bad news for the rest of us.
Kavanaugh has ruled that the EPA lacks the authority to regulate 
greenhouse gases. He ruled against regulating cross-state air pollution. 
He ruled in favor of dumping coal waste and dumping hazardous waste. He 
ruled that it's okay for factory farms to foul the air of their neighbors.
When the Trump administration sought to delay rules designed to reduce 
climate-changing emissions of methane, Kavanaugh sided with polluters. 
When the EPA sought to replace fluorinated chemicals known as HFCs to 
reduce greenhouse gas emissions, he complained that the proposed rule 
pulled the rug out from under polluters—even though replacement 
chemicals are readily available. Kavanaugh also supported giving large 
plants and factories more time to comply with greenhouse gas rules.
In some cases, Kavanaugh has adopted the view that the EPA must always 
weigh the costs to polluters against the benefits to public health, 
regardless of Congressional direction. When the EPA was proposing to 
regulate mercury emissions, Kavanaugh argued that the EPA was obligated 
to consider the costs of regulatory compliance to polluters.
Likewise, when the EPA proposed to apportion cross-state pollution, 
Kavanaugh sided with industry by advocating for the regulation that is 
least costly to industry, not most protective of public health.
In another case, Kavanaugh argued that the EPA had failed to consider 
the costs to a coal company dumping mine waste into streams, even though 
the agency had no obligation to consider cost. In one case, Kavanaugh 
sought to underestimate the public health benefits of reducing mercury 
pollution by discounting other benefits, like reducing particulate matter.
https://www.ecowatch.com/did-kavanaugh-lie-to-senate-2602840127.html


[Activism]
*Climate change protest blitz targets local action in face of Trump 
hostility 
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/sep/07/climate-change-protest-blitz-targets-local-action-in-face-of-trump-hostility>*
With little hope of federal action, a series of marches and events in 70 
countries will focus on climate change's effects now and the low-income 
and minority groups bearing the brunt
Climate change activism has always had the stubbornly tough task of 
mobilizing the public to confront a slow-moving, largely invisible 
problem while being stymied by a fantastically wealthy fossil fuel 
industry and an array of sceptics in politics and the media.
Climate campaigners would, therefore, be forgiven a few moments of 
despair in the era of Donald Trump. Trump's election elicited two large 
public howls from those concerned about climate change – the People's 
Climate March and the Science March, held within days of each other in 
April last year – but any hopes of persuasion have now given way to 
attritional confrontation and attempts to bypass the administration 
altogether...
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/sep/07/climate-change-protest-blitz-targets-local-action-in-face-of-trump-hostility


[72%]
*Fears over climate change hit highest level in a decade following 
heatwave, study says 
<https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change-heatwave-global-warming-opinium-poll-leo-barasi-a8522901.html>*
Exclusive: 72 per cent of British adults now 'very' or 'fairly' 
concerned about impacts of climate change
Harry Cockburn
British people's concern over climate change hit the highest level in 
almost a decade amid the record-breaking heatwave which swept across 
Britain this summer, a new poll has revealed.
While many people took the opportunity to enjoy the hot weather, the 
unprecedented temperatures also appear to have led many to worry about 
what caused it.
The poll by Opinium showed 60 per cent of British adults think climate 
change made the heatwave "stronger or more likely to happen".
It also revealed almost a third of respondents (30 per cent) now 
describe themselves as "very concerned" about climate change – higher 
than any poll since 2008. A further 42 per cent said they are "fairly" 
concerned.
The soaring summer heat surpassed the record set in 1976 in England and 
daytime temperatures regularly rose above 30C across the country 
throughout June and July.
The dry conditions had a significant impact on farms, with warnings food 
prices could rise in the coming months. There were also record A&E 
admissions over the summer.
- - - -
"This is also not the first time that the fingerprints of climate change 
have been seen on extreme weather events in the UK, with devastating 
storms that caused hundreds of millions of pounds in damage in 2015 made 
40 per cent more likely by climate change."
He added: "As more of these events occur in the UK, public support for 
action to cut emissions is likely to continue to swell."
A spokesperson from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural 
Affairs told The Independent: "We are taking robust action to ensure our 
country is resilient and prepared for the challenges a changing climate 
brings.
"Our long-term plan for climate change adaptation sets out ongoing work 
and investment to make sure food and water supplies are protected, 
businesses and communities are properly prepared and the right 
infrastructure is in place."
https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change-heatwave-global-warming-opinium-poll-leo-barasi-a8522901.html


[Significant]
*Massachusetts Can Legally Limit CO2 Emissions from Power Plants, Court 
Rules 
<https://insideclimatenews.org/news/05092018/climate-change-power-plant-carbon-emissions-law-massachusetts-state-clean-energy-transition-trump>*
While the Trump administration tries to roll back pollution controls, 
states are setting their own climate change rules in a shift toward 
cleaner energy.
BY MARIANNE LAVELLE
Massachusetts' highest court on Tuesday resoundingly upheld the state's 
power to impose limits on carbon emissions from power plants.
It's the latest example of states establishing their authority to fill 
the regulatory void the Trump administration is creating as it moves to 
roll back the Clean Power Plan and other federal climate regulations.
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection finalized rules 
last year to require power plants within the state's borders to reduce 
their emissions annually, amounting to a 7 percent reduction in 
greenhouse gas emissions from current levels by 2020 and an 80 percent 
reduction by 2050. It is one of a suite of clean energy and pollution 
control policies state officials have put into place under the Global 
Warming Solutions Act, signed into law by then-Gov. Deval Patrick in 2008...
- - - - -
Massachusetts' Push Away from Fossil Fuels
The decision comes at  pivotal moment for Massachusetts, as it 
transitions to cleaner energy.
The state's last coal plant, Brayton Point in Somerset, closed last 
year, and the state has been investing in the infrastructure to support 
an offshore wind industry. The Vineyard Wind project, an 800 megawatt 
offshore wind farm planned off the coast of Martha's Vineyard, is 
expected to soon start the state toward its goal of having 1,600 
megawatts of offshore wind energy by 2027.
"It spells the end of fossil fuel electricity in Massachusetts," said 
David Ismay, an attorney with the Boston-based Conservation Law 
Foundation, arguing the standards will mean a gradual phase-down in the 
natural gas generation, which dominates the state's electricity mix.
"It solidifies the shift to clean energy."...
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/05092018/climate-change-power-plant-carbon-emissions-law-massachusetts-state-clean-energy-transition-trump


[Long practice]
*Tribe: Army Corps Is Stonewalling on Dakota Access Pipeline Report, 
Spill Risk 
<https://insideclimatenews.org/news/05092018/standing-rock-tribe-dapl-dakota-access-pipeline-oil-spill-risk-report-army-corps>*
The Corps says it found no significant environmental impact, but it's 
holding back the report. Standing Rock calls it rubber-stamping an 
'illegal and flawed permit'.
BY PHIL MCKENNA
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is defending its claim that the Dakota 
Access pipeline has no significant environmental impact, but it issued 
only a brief summary of its court-ordered reassessment while keeping the 
full analysis confidential.

The delay in releasing the full report, including crucial details about 
potential oil spills, has incensed the Standing Rock Tribe, whose 
reservation sits a half-mile downstream from where the pipeline crosses 
the Missouri River.

The tribe said the Army Corps is stonewalling, and it said it will 
continue to oppose the pipeline. Meanwhile, oil continues to flow 
through the pipeline two years after opponents set up a desperate 
encampment to try to block the project.
- - - -
Memo Fails to Address Oil Spill Risk
A key omission from the Corps' memo was detailed technical information 
about a worst case scenario spill from the pipeline into the Missouri 
River and the risks such a spill would pose to members of the Standing 
Rock reservation, Hasselman said. The reservation is just downstream 
from where the pipeline crosses the Missouri River, the tribe's water 
supply. The tribe says it has struggled to get detailed information 
about potential spills and spill response plans from Energy Transfer 
Partners...
- - - - -
"You shouldn't have to trade your ecosystem to have quality of life and 
decent infrastructure, and that is basically what tribes are being 
forced to do," Winona LaDuke, Honor the Earth's Executive Director, said.
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/05092018/standing-rock-tribe-dapl-dakota-access-pipeline-oil-spill-risk-report-army-corps


[You probably know this]
*Climate Point: Summer nights are getting hotter 
<https://www.usatoday.com/story/nletter/climatepoint/2018/09/06/climate-point-summer-nights-getting-hotter/1215439002/>*
Because summer wasn't hot enough already: One of the devilish 
consequences of global warming is that overnight temperatures are rising 
faster than daytime temperatures, which doesn't sound terrible until you 
realize how important the nighttime cooldown is for human health. (Very 
important!) So it is alarming to read that the U.S. just experienced its 
hottest average summer nights on record 
<https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2018/09/06/climate-change-global-warming-summer-heat-record-nighttime-temperatures-noaa/1211349002/>, 
as USA TODAY's Doyle Rice reports. Also alarming, but fascinating, is 
this cool feature from the New York Times that shows how much hotter 
your hometown has gotten since you were born 
<https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/30/climate/how-much-hotter-is-your-hometown.html>.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/nletter/climatepoint/2018/09/06/climate-point-summer-nights-getting-hotter/1215439002/


[More Activism]
*Tell us: are you taking part in a Rise for Climate event? 
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/sep/05/tell-us-are-you-taking-part-in-a-rise-for-climate-event>*
Wherever in the world you are, we'd like to hear your stories and see 
your pictures if you are participating this weekend
Wed 5 Sep 2018Last modified on Wed 5 Sep 201807.13 EDT

  * <https://www.facebook.com/dialog/share?app_id=180444840287&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fenvironment%2F2018%2Fsep%2F05%2Ftell-us-are-you-taking-part-in-a-rise-for-climate-event%3FCMP%3Dshare_btn_fb>
  * <https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Tell%20us%3A%20are%20you%20taking%20part%20in%20a%20Rise%20for%20Climate%20event%3F&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fenvironment%2F2018%2Fsep%2F05%2Ftell-us-are-you-taking-part-in-a-rise-for-climate-event%3FCMP%3Dshare_btn_tw>
  * <mailto:?subject=Tell%20us%3A%20are%20you%20taking%20part%20in%20a%20Rise%20for%20Climate%20event%3F&body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fenvironment%2F2018%2Fsep%2F05%2Ftell-us-are-you-taking-part-in-a-rise-for-climate-event%3FCMP%3Dshare_btn_link>


      Shares

367

Tens of thousands of people around the world will mobilise over the 
weekend of 8-9 September under the banner of Rise for Climate, a 
grassroots movementseeking a fossil fuel free world 
<https://riseforclimate.org/>.
More than 600 events are planned in at least 80 countries, with one of 
the key aims to challenge the decision-makers attending the Global 
Climate Summit in California on 12 September to escalate decarbonisation 
efforts and targets.
As well as a flagship event in San Fransisco which the organisers say 
will be the largest climate march the US west coast has ever seen, 
community groups are findinginnovative ways to urge a future in which 
all energy sources are 100% renewable 
<https://riseforclimate.org/plan-highlights/>, including an initiative 
asking participants toshare artworks related to the movement 
<https://riseforclimate.org/rise-art/>.
We would like to hear from you if you are taking part in any of the 
events or involved in organising where you live, and will highlight some 
of your contributions in our coverage. You can also share pictures and 
stories from the events you attend.
Rise For Climate's website hasan interactive map can search for events 
near you <https://riseforclimate.org/#map>.
https://w.theguardian.com/environment/2018/sep/05/tell-us-are-you-taking-part-in-a-rise-for-climate-event

[Birds]*
Alaska Refuge Can't Protect its Wildlife from Climate Change 
<https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/09/plastics-birds-climate-change-alaska-news/>
*Plummeting populations in a huge Alaska wildlife refuge might be caused 
by climate change and plastics.
BY SAMANTHA YADRON
Jones researches marine heat waves, which can cause extreme, 
ecosystem-wide harm to wildlife. The most well-known marine heat wave, 
"the blob," caused an unprecedented auklet die-off just south of the 
refuge from 2014-2015.
"Marine heat waves are becoming more frequent and more intense," says 
Jones, and they build upon each warmer year, affecting seabirds "in ways 
that are fairly unpredictable."
The die-offs have continued into 2018, with more than 1,400 birds 
reported rotting on Bering Sea beaches and showing signs of starvation 
since May, according to the National Park Service...
- - - - -
"There was a huge die-off, as a matter of fact, of murres this winter 
and they were mostly emaciated. They didn't have the food they needed to 
eat," Causey said.
"It seems to be an ecosystem-wide problem," Padula said.
According to the National Park Service, "Hundreds of thousands of 
seabirds, mostly common murres, died of starvation" along the Pacific 
coast, the Gulf of Alaska, and in the Aleutian Islands from 2015-2016. 
Surveys discovered nearly 2,100 bird carcasses rotting on the region's 
beaches in 2016.
"The Bering Sea is so dependent and so responsive to changes in the sea 
ice," says Jones, to the point where the food supply dwindles and 
becomes less nutritious. "We've seen this in parts of Alaska pretty much 
every year since 2014."
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/09/plastics-birds-climate-change-alaska-news/*


This Day in Climate History - September 8, 2003 
<http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/FR-2003-09-08/03-22764/content-detail.html> 
- from D.R. Tucker
*September 8, 2003: The EPA denies a petition by the International 
Center for Technology Assessment to regulate greenhouse gas emissions 
under the Clean Air Act, setting off a four-year legal battle that 
culminates in the Supreme Court's Massachusetts v. EPA ruling.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/FR-2003-09-08/03-22764/content-detail.html/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
///Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
//
/https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote//
///
///To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
/to news digest. /

        *** Privacy and Security: * This is a text-only mailing that
        carries no images which may originate from remote servers.
        Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
        sender.
        By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
        democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
        commercial purposes.
        To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote with subject: 
        subscribe,  To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe
        Also youmay subscribe/unsubscribe at
        https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
        Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Paulifor
        http://TheClimate.Vote delivering succinct information for
        citizens and responsible governments of all levels.   List
        membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
        restricted to this mailing list.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20180908/fe0c5dfa/attachment.html>


More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list