[TheClimate.Vote] March 25, 2019 - Daily Global Warming News Digest.
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Mon Mar 25 07:23:57 EDT 2019
/March 25, 2019/
[misunderstood]
*Study shows IPCC is underselling climate change*
March 19, 2019, University of Adelaide
A new study has revealed that the language used by the global climate
change watchdog, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),
is overly conservative - and therefore the threats are much greater than
the Panel's reports suggest...
- -
"We found that the main message from the reports--that our society is in
climate emergency--is lost by overstatement of uncertainty and gets
confused among the gigabytes of information," says lead author Dr.
Salvador Herrando-Perez, from the University of Adelaide's Environment
Institute and Australian Centre for Ancient DNA.
"The IPCC supports the overwhelming scientific consensus about human
impact on climate change, so we would expect the reports' vocabulary to
be dominated by greater certainty on the state of climate science--but
this is not the case."...
- - -
The team says the IPCC reports should incorporate a clear connection
between the certainty of thousands of scientific findings and the
certainty that humans are vastly altering the Earth's climate. The team
recommends a new IPCC working group of communication specialists to
oversee the language and effective dissemination, and convey the message
accurately.
"Our evolutionary history tells us Earth will ultimately survive more
aridity, more hurricanes, more floods, more sea-level rise, more
extinctions and degraded ecosystems, but our society as we know it today
might not unless we clearly articulate the magnitude of the threat it
poses," says Dr. Herrando-Perez.
Read more at:
https://phys.org/news/2019-03-ipcc-underselling-climate.html#jCp
[Gallup report]
*Americans as Concerned as Ever About Global Warming*
- 66% believe global warming is caused by human activity, near all-time high
- Fewer highly worried about it, though also near high point in Gallup trend
- Partisan differences still stark, with most Democrats worried, most in
GOP not
https://news.gallup.com/poll/248027/americans-concerned-ever-global-warming.aspx
[NPR discovers climate news beat]
*Climate Series Introduction*
We introduce a Weekend Edition series on climate change and adaptations
that people are already
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/24/706295313/climate-series-introduction
making along the East Coast.
- - -
[Most predictable, sea level rise. Most obvious, Florida]
*How Climate Change Is Affecting Residents' Health In Miami*
March 24, 20198:13 - Weekend Edition Sunday - LULU GARCIA-NAVARRO
We visit Miami to talk with Dr. Cheryl Holder of Florida Clinicians For
Climate Action, and Jorge, a fruit vendor who is feeling the effects of
increasingly hot days firsthand.
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/24/706295403/how-climate-change-is-affecting-residents-health-in-miami
[Vogue Magazine asks a question]
*Do Americans Have a Constitutional Right to a Livable Planet? Meet the
21 Young People Who Say They Do*
https://www.vogue.com/article/youth-v-gov-fight-for-future-april-2019-issue
[After water, food is most important]
*For A Healthier Planet, Eat These 50 Foods, Campaign Urges*
- - -
According to the report, 75 percent of the food we consume comes from
just 12 plant sources and five animal sources. And just three crops --
wheat, corn and rice -- make up nearly 60 percent of the plant-based
calories in most diets.
The lack of variety in agriculture is both bad for nature and a threat
to food security, the report says. It argues that it's essential we
change our eating habits to protect the planet and ensure we are able to
feed the growing global population...
- - -
According to the report, 75 percent of the food we consume comes from
just 12 plant sources and five animal sources. And just three crops --
wheat, corn and rice -- make up nearly 60 percent of the plant-based
calories in most diets.
The lack of variety in agriculture is both bad for nature and a threat
to food security, the report says. It argues that it's essential we
change our eating habits to protect the planet and ensure we are able to
feed the growing global population...
- - -
"What's exciting about this is some of the biggest issues we face -
climate change and human health - are coming together and the solutions
are deeply aligned," he says. "What's good for us is also better for the
planet."
Kass says consumers can just as easily drive the solutions as the
problems. And don't worry if you're not familiar with foods like fonio
or salsify root. You can start by cutting back on meat and eating more
beans.
"Any bean," says Kass. "You can't go wrong. Black beans, pinto beans ...
they couldn't be better for you and they are as sustainable as any other
product."
https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/03/24/706004242/for-a-healthier-planet-eat-these-50-foods-campaign-urges
[BBC series]
*Sustainable thinking 16 VIDEOS*
A playlist featuring new, challenging and even visionary thinking around
climate change and sustainability.
https://www.bbc.com/ideas/videos/are-you-suffering-from-climate-change-anxiety/p073zgqd?playlist=sustainable-thinking
[Most doctors regard med school as the only valid source of learning]
*Medical schools must prepare students to work in a world altered by
climate change*
By ANNA GOSHUA MARCH 19, 2019
Low water levels are seen visible on the banks of Entrepenas reservoir
in Duron, Spain, in 2017, when it was at its lowest level since 1994.
As a medical student fumbling with the fundamentals of interviewing
patients and taking medical histories, the realities of being a doctor
seem like a far-off dream. My colleagues and I work hard to prepare
ourselves to be equipped to address the increasingly complex health care
issues that will affect the lives of our future patients, from
inequities in access to quality care to multidrug resistance.
The most pressing of these issues is climate change, a growing
environmental emergency that will have devastating health impacts. Food
shortages induced by climate change are alone expected to account for
more than 500,000 additional deaths globally by 2050. Regardless of
their personal interest in climate change or their belief that advocacy
about it is within the scope of medical practice, physicians will be on
the front lines of confronting its effects.
Action on climate change has been paralyzed by denial, misunderstanding
of its urgency, and a sense of powerlessness in the face of an
existential threat. This is why it is especially important for medical
schools to integrate climate change into their curricula so future
physicians understand the challenges and are prepared to use their
positions as care providers, educators, and advocates to tackle this threat.
Yet a recent search of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Curriculum Inventory showed that no medical schools report including
content related to climate change.
Related: We're providing medical care to a new type of migrant -- the
climate migrant
Some schools have begun to address this gap. The University of
California, San Francisco, for example, has introduced elective courses
covering topics such as food security and sustainability. It also
integrated case studies on global climate change into a mandatory
first-year course.
"Global warming is the biggest public health threat of the 21st century
and is going to change life on earth as we know it. It is an essential
part of any 21st century medical school curriculum," said Dr. Thomas
Newman, co-founder of a Climate Health and Inquiry course launched in
2017, in a UCSF article about the course.
Medical schools already have what some see as overloaded curricula. It
is difficult to argue that they should add more material. Yet the
medical curriculum lends itself to promoting eco-medical literacy and
sustainability over all four years of education. During the preclinical
years, this could take the form of connecting pathophysiology to
climate, such as how climate change contributes to cardiovascular
disease. A health policy course could be an opportunity to discuss
relevant climate change policy action and opportunities for student
engagement. During clerkships, the focus could be on how to identify and
communicate with patients who are especially vulnerable to the effects
of climate change, as well as diagnose and manage climate-related
physical and mental health issues.
There are at least three major ways that climate change will affect the
practice of medicine and for which medical education must prepare future
physicians.
First, climate change will directly and indirectly affect individual and
population health. Extreme weather events like drought affect physical
and mental health, but also affect social determinants of health such as
water and food security, air quality, and housing. Given that
marginalized communities are most susceptible to the effects of climate
change, it will widen existing health disparities. Physicians will need
to work with patients to manage climate-induced health burdens, educate
them about their risk factors, and help them develop contingency plans
in case of environmental emergencies.
Second, climate change will require an unprecedented degree of
adaptation to unexpected and changing threats. Diseases previously
thought to be unrelated to climate, like chickenpox, are turning out to
be climate sensitive. The geographic distribution and seasonality of
various infectious diseases will change. Extreme weather events of
increasing severity will strain our capacity to deliver care. Future
physicians must be prepared to handle these challenges in both the
clinical setting and, more broadly, work collaboratively within their
communities to plan and implement pre-emptive strategies.
Third, physicians and the rest of the health care sector must be aware
of and accountable for their collective contributions to climate change.
The U.S. health system is the seventh-largest producer of carbon dioxide
globally. It released 614 million metric tons of carbon dioxide
equivalents in 2013, which would generate between 123,000 and 381,000
disability-adjusted life years of adverse health effects in the future.
My generation of physicians must envision a new sustainable health
system to reduce its substantial carbon footprint. Possibilities include
expanding telemedicine, integrating environmental impacts into
cost-benefit analyses of health services, and committing to carbon
neutrality. Future physicians must also advocate for changes to health
infrastructure that make health care facilities more resilient to
climate damage. Without physicians lobbying for the greening of the
health system, the good we accomplish could be outpaced by the damage we
inflict.
Climate change is the context in which today's medical students will
practice medicine. This threat will intersect with every facet of our
patients' lives and impose barriers to health delivery we will have to
navigate. Medical students can't afford the luxury of choosing to be
interested in climate change the way we will select our medical
specialties. It is an urgent reality we must confront with the knowledge
and skills we acquire in order to innovate, advocate, and care for
patients and communities affected by climate change.
Anna Goshua is a first-year medical student at Stanford University
School of Medicine.
https://www.statnews.com/2019/03/19/climate-change-medical-school/
[helping fix situations and reset opinions]
*Katrina, the BP spill, now Houston: This consulting firm keeps coming
under fire*
By Naveena Sadasivam on Mar 22, 2019
A crude oil spill during Hurricane Katrina in 2005. A coal ash spill in
Tennessee in 2008. The BP oil spill in 2010. In all three cases, the
companies responsible for these environmental calamities turned to the
same Arkansas-based consulting firm, the Center for Toxicology and
Environmental Health, to monitor air and water quality and chemical
exposure in workers.
In each case, CTEH was found to have either incorrectly handled data
collection or downplayed the risks of exposure to toxic chemicals. But
the companies used CTEH's data to reassure people that the spilled
chemicals posed little risk to public health.
This week, a fire at International Terminals Company's chemical storage
facility outside Houston, blanketed the country's fourth-largest city in
a cloud of smoke. Multiple school districts in the area cancelled
classes. Once again, CTEH got the call to provide air quality monitoring.
The fire at ITC's facility reignited late Friday afternoon after a dike
wall used to contain chemicals partially collapsed, renewing concerns
about air quality. According to initial reports, the company released 9
million pounds of pollutants in just the first day of the fire. On
Thursday, the city of Deer Park, home to the facility, issued a
shelter-in-place advisory after benzene levels spiked overnight.
Long-term benzene exposure can cause anemia, lead to cancer, and damage
women's reproductive health.
Earlier in the week, ITC had said that its air quality testing data
showed conditions "below levels" that would raise health concerns, even
as residents near the fire complained of nosebleeds, headaches, and
irritated throats. The statement prompted Deer Park to lift an earlier
shelter-in-place advisory.
Elena Craft, senior director for climate and health at Environmental
Defense Fund, said CTEH was a "concerning choice" as a consultant "given
their history." ITC has posted nine air quality monitoring reports
produced by CTEH on its website since the Deer Park fire began and
Craft, a toxicologist by training, said that at least one contained
"clear, obvious errors."
In that report, issued on March 18, CTEH said it used two types of
instruments with different detection limits to measure benzene levels.
The company collected just six samples with the instrument that had a
lower detection limit -- meaning it could pick up lower levels of
airborne benzene. But on a map elsewhere in the report, CTEH appeared to
indicate that it had tested for lower benzene levels at dozens of sites.
It marked more than 60 locations on a map where it claimed it had tested
for low levels of benzene and had not detected it.
In a written statement to Grist, Phil Goad, CTEH's founder, said that in
its more than 20 years in business "CTEH has never been cited for
inaccurate or misleading data." The company's "top priority is, and will
continue to be, to safeguard public health," he said, adding its air
quality-monitoring plans in Houston have been approved by the
Environmental Protection Agency and Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality.
Goad admitted to two errors in the March 18 report, including
incorrectly reporting detection limits, and said it would "update the
report to correct this typographical error."
Even if the error was a typo, Craft said CTEH's report did not inspire
confidence. "It was a sloppy job," she said.
In the last two decades, CTEH has come under fire for its work in
high-profile environmental contamination cases across the country. In
2005, a storage tank at a Murphy Oil refinery in Louisiana released more
than 25,000 barrels of crude oil into floodwaters. The spill affected
roughly 1,700 homes in the New Orleans suburb of Chalmette, and Murphy
Oil hired CTEH to conduct soil testing. But instead of following the
EPA's instructions on collecting samples, so the agency could verify
CTEH's readings, the firm mixed samples taken at different times from
the same site. It also contaminated samples by bagging soil from
different locations together. Murphy Oil then used CTEH's test results
to persuade residents not to sue the company.
In 2008, the Tennessee Valley Authority hired the consulting firm after
coal ash from its Kingston Fossil plant in Roane County, Tennessee,
spilled into the Emory River. An EPA audit later found that CTEH used
inaccurate monitoring methods to survey air quality.
Two years later, BP hired the company to serve as the primary monitor
for its offshore workers, collecting health and chemical exposure data
in the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon spill. The company would only
provide aggregated data and the complete dataset was not made available
to federal regulators, which prompted lawmakers to urge BP to stop
working with CTEH. The company has a history, the legislators wrote, "of
releasing findings defending the corporate interests that employ them."
CTEH is not the only entity collecting air quality data around the Deer
Park fire. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the
Environmental Protection Agency, and Houston's own Harris County have
all deployed air monitors to survey pollution levels. The U.S. Chemical
Safety Board, an investigatory body that doesn't have the authority to
fine or regulate companies, is also looking into the cause of the fire.
https://grist.org/article/katrina-the-bp-spill-now-houston-this-consulting-firm-keeps-coming-under-fire/
- - -
[see CTEH website]
*Response: No Matter Where Crisis Occurs, We Can Be There*
CTEH has experience in a wide range of responses, including, major
offshore oil spills, transportation incidents with hazardous materials,
well control events, human health and environmental events (e.g., Ebola,
avian flu), and natural disasters for both the public and private
sectors. We also have an extensive network of emergency responders to
support the delivery of our preparedness, response, and recovery of
all-threat/all-hazard services. We offer a valuable surge capability for
your crisis management needs and in support of Incident Management Teams
https://www.cteh.com/
[Wind energy history in Texas -- the boom started in 1981 - documentary]
Peter Sinclair says: "I'm heading to an American Wind Energy Association
conference this week, so appropriately, I came upon this archival
footage of my friend Michael Osborne's early efforts in the Texas wind
industry."
*Lease the Wind YouTube video *
Earthfamilyalpha - Published on Mar 15, 2019
This 1981 documentary of the birth of the Texas Wind Industry was
produced by Michael Osborne, renewable energy thought leader and
author. It was directed and edited by John Andrews.
https://youtu.be/RGHt-xqm5dA
- - -
Earth Family Alpha:
Since these early days, I have been involved in the ever growing Wind
Industry, securing leases for both wind developers and utilities,
sometimes erecting wind monitoring systems to prove the winds, often
working the legislature for tax abatements while arguing at the PUC for
favorable interconnect rules and transmission line improvements.
During my time at Austin Energy, I helped oversee well over a Gigawatt
of Wind Power in 14 years. (AE now has 1850 MWs).
When I left AE and was appointed to the Electric Utility Commission, I
approved over 600 MWs of Wind and another 600 MWs of solar.
Since the early 90s, like the late 70s, we have had Presidents and
Administrations that understood the wisdom and the importance of
reaching as high a penetration of carbon-free energy as possible. Life
was not always good, but it wasn't bad. It was rational.
But then, a not so funny thing happened on the way to dealing with the
climate issue.
The Republican Party became the party of Intellectual poverty. They
nominated a pro-coal candidate who skillfully ran off with the
presidential election with 70,000 votes to spare while losing the
popular vote by 3 million. And that victory has emboldened the very
worst of the climate denying wing of what used to be a rational and
responsible national party.
Nowhere is that more obvious than right here in Austin. Our own heart
of darkness lurks in its Congress Street headquarters spewing outright
lies and misinformation fronting for their Kock-sucker benefactors.
They are trying to beat back the tide with a cane.
They are a pitiful, bitter old man who will pass with few friends,
and an army of enemies.
And they will be remembered for their crimes against their own.
They will Reap the Wind.
https://climatecrocks.com/2019/03/24/birth-of-the-texas-wind-industry-1981/
[Today and tomorrow waste disposables]
*Will renewables end up as more landfill?*
Just Have a Think
Published on Mar 24, 2019
Solar and Wind energy are growing at a truly astonishing pace on every
continent. But in the race for global supremacy in the power generation
sector have we neglected to consider how we will deal with millions of
panels and turbines when they come to the end of their useful lives? Are
we storing up yet another environmental problem?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLTJZKYA40Y
*This Day in Climate History - March 25, 2002 - from D.R. Tucker*
March 25, 2002: The Associated Press reports:
"Environmentalists say their requests for a meeting with Energy
Secretary Spencer Abraham in the months prior to the release of the
Bush administration's energy report were rebuffed by an aide who
cited Abraham's' busy schedule.
"John Adams, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council,
said Wednesday the refusal to meet with the environmentalists stands
in sharp contrast to the eight meetings Abraham had with energy and
business groups in early 2001 to discuss the energy plan."
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/green-groups-we-had-no-say/
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
*** Privacy and Security:*This is a text-only mailing that carries no
images which may originate from remote servers. Text-only messages
provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list