[TheClimate.Vote] August 2, 2020 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Sun Aug 2 10:54:25 EDT 2020
/*August 2, 2020*/
[US has 38% now]
*Biden calls for 100 percent clean electricity by 2035. Here's how far
we have to go.*
States such as New York, California and Maine already have ambitious
goals, while Ohio and West Virginia have weakened theirs
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2020/07/30/biden-calls-100-percent-clean-electricity-by-2035-heres-how-far-we-have-go/?arc404=true
[Unbounded Youthful Exuberance!]
*Student Leadership on Climate Solutions*
31 July 2020 - James Hansen
A stunning and heartening message appeared in my e-mails this week,
which I share in hopes that it will encourage you as much as it did me.
Look at this (https://www.s4cd.org/statement) and scroll down to see our
impressive future leaders. The e-mail, from Alex Posner, founder of the
group, Students for Carbon Dividends (S4CD) included:
Today, after months of organizing, the student climate group I lead
(Students for Carbon Dividends) has unveiled the "Students Government
Leaders' Statement on Carbon Dividends," the largest declaration of
student body presidents in US history.
The bipartisan statement, which is inspired by last year's Economists'
Statement on Carbon Dividends, includes 350+ college student government
presidents from all 50 states. Collectively, the signers represent over
4 million students from campuses across the country--ranging from
Stanford and MIT to Mississippi State and the University of Michigan….
We must help the United States Congress to recognize the wisdom these
young people express. Politicians must resist the temptations of a new
revenue source. The public will allow the carbon fee to rise to a level
that moves us to clean energies only if the money goes directly to the
public.
This approach is optimum for social justice. Low-income and most
middle-income people make money with Fee & Dividend; wealthy people lose
because of their large carbon footprint.
Economic studies show that putting 100 percent of the funds immediately
into the hands of the public spurs the economy, creates millions of
jobs, increases GNP and government revenue - just what is needed to
provide a basis for progressive policies.
The students are following the science! The science - climate, energy,
economics - is clear. The fastest route to a global solution is a
simple, honest, domestic carbon fee with border duties on products from
countries without an equivalent fee.
You can help young people and other life on Earth best by supporting
Citizens Climate Lobby. https://citizensclimatelobby.org/
- -
[See images of these Students For Carbon Dividends
https://www.s4cd.org/all-sbp-signees]
As young people, with decades of life ahead, we are clear-eyed about
what climate disruption means for our generation. That's why we
recognize the power of a consensus solution like carbon dividends to
bridge partisan divides, protect our shared environment, and strengthen
the economy. Where our political leaders have been unwilling, or unable,
to forge agreement around common-sense solutions, we on college campuses
are showing them how it's done.
*STUDENT GOVERNMENT LEADERS' STATEMENT ON CARBON DIVIDENDS*
The climate threat is one of the greatest challenges of our generation.
It transcends virtually every other issue because it threatens the basic
building blocks of our security and prosperity, and with it, the
American way of life. While the precise effects of climate instability
remain uncertain, the risks are too grave to ignore.
This is why we are stepping forward today--as the foremost student
leaders at America's colleges and universities--to endorse the
breakthrough, bipartisan climate solution known as carbon dividends.
The carbon dividends framework has earned truly record-breaking support.
In 2019, more than 3,500 US economists--from all 50 states and virtually
every major college and university in the country--united in support of
the solution. It became the largest statement of economists in the
history of the profession.
Signatories of the "Economists' Statement on Carbon Dividends" include
every living former Federal Reserve Chair, as well as 27 Nobel
Prize-winners--the largest number to endorse any policy on any topic,
ever. Supporters also include 15 former Chairs of the Council of
Economic Advisers, representing Presidential administrations on both
sides of the aisle over the last half century.
To this unprecedented show of force, we now add our own. We, the
undersigned college and university student body presidents and leaders,
join this historic coalition of economists and opinion leaders in
uniting behind the four pillars of this breakthrough solution:
=
*1.A steadily rising price on carbon to spur clean energy innovation and
drive emissions reductions**
**
**2.Carbon dividend rebates to ensure revenue-neutrality and benefit
American families**
**
**3.The streamlining of carbon regulations that are no longer necessary**
**
**4.Border-carbon adjustments to level the playing field for American
workers and businesses and hold other countries accountable*
=
This win-win proposal is built upon bedrock principles of economics and
would succeed in delivering far greater emissions reductions than all
previous policies combined. It would promote US leadership and unleash
American innovation toward a cleaner and more prosperous future. While
there are complementary policies to consider, the carbon dividends
framework has emerged as a cornerstone solution. Our economics
professors, in a historic groundswell of support, have coalesced around
this concrete climate strategy, and we are now carrying the torch forward.
As young people, with decades of life ahead, we are clear-eyed about
what climate disruption means for our generation. That's why we
recognize the power of a consensus solution like carbon dividends to
bridge partisan divides, protect our shared environment, and strengthen
the economy. Where our political leaders have been unwilling, or unable,
to forge agreement around common-sense solutions, we on college campuses
are showing them how it's done.
https://www.s4cd.org/statement-text
[Optimism for storage]
*Dan Kammen on New Batteries*
Aug 1, 2020
greenmanbucket
Dan Kammen PhD is an Engineer and Professor at University of California
Berkeley.
He is known globally as an expert on new energy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbRBBbUKY-I
[Ironic news from The Barents Observer]
*Climate change hits back, Svalbard coal mine flooded by melting glacier*
After days with record heat at Svalbard, the penetration of water from
the above melting glacier is now flooding Norway's only operating coal
mine that supplies the country's only coal-power plant.
ByThomas Nilsen
July 30, 2020
Large water penetration in Gruve 7 (Mine 7) was discovered on Sunday
July 26 during a routine inspection, the Store Norske mining company
informs.
The day before, a record heat of 21,7°C was measured in Longyearbyen,
the highest temperature ever measured so far north in the European Arctic.
Mine 7 is located some 15 kilometers southeast of Longyearbyen and is
the only remaining Norwegian operated coal mine on the Arctic
archipelago. The mine supplies the local coal-power plant with about
30,000 tons of coal annually, while another 80,000 tons are exported to
customers in the European metallurgical and chemical industry.
The mountain above the mine is covered by a glacier and it is melting
water from this glacier that now penetrates through the rocks into the mine.
Extra pumps are installed, but has so far not been able to remove more
water than is coming in, the company explains. New pipes are put in
place and more pumping capacity is brought in.
"We are also working on trying to get an overview of the equipment we
can expect to have been destroyed and therefore need to be replaced
before operations can start again," says mining chief Per Nilssen. He
says it is too early to tell when coal mining can start again.
Operations were currently on a pause due to the coronavirus situation, a
halt in mining supposed to last until August 17. The pause is now likely
to be prolonged, the mining company informs.
Store Norske is owned by the state. Norway has for years been criticized
for the paradox of mining coal and supplying electricity from a coal
power plant to the town of Longyearbyen at the place on earth where
temperatures are rising most due to climate changes.
Since the 70s, the annual average temperatures have risen by 4°C at
Svalbard, with winter temperatures rising more than 7°C, as previously
reported by the Barents Observer. A climate report released last year
warns that annual average temperatures could increase with up to 10
degrees Celsius by 2100.
This is not the first time climate changes troubles human activities on
Svalbard. The Global Seed Vault, where some 45,000 international
varieties are stored deep into what originally was believed to be safe
permafrost, was recently forced to rebuild its entrance.
Climate change caused more snow and rain and the entrance was flooded
several times. During reconstruction, the ground around the new
waterproof entrance is artificially frozen to avoid further erosion.
In the town of Longyearbyen is houses sagging due to unstable ground as
the permafrost melts. About 250 homes will have to be torn down and new
buildings are built on steel pillars and sensors are placed in the
ground to measure how the steel constructions impact the permafrost.
https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/industry-and-energy/2020/07/coal-mine-flooded-melting-glacier
[OK, will do]
*The four types of climate denier, and why you should ignore them all*
Damian Carrington
The shill, the grifter, the egomaniac and the ideological fool: each
distorts the urgent global debate in their own way
new book, described as "deeply and fatally flawed" by an expert
reviewer, recently reached the top of Amazon's bestseller list for
environmental science and made it into a weekly top 10 list for all
nonfiction titles.
How did this happen? Because, as Brendan Behan put it, "there's no such
thing as bad publicity". In an article promoting his book, Michael
Shellenberger - with jaw-dropping hubris - apologises on behalf of all
environmentalists for the "climate scare we created over the last 30 years".
Shellenberger was named a hero of the environment by Time magazine in
2008 and is a loud advocate of nuclear power, but the article was
described by six leading scientists as "cherry-picking", "misleading"
and containing "outright falsehoods".
The article was widely republished, even after being removed from its
first home, Forbes, for violating the title's editorial guidelines on
self-promotion, adding further heat to the storm. And this is why all
those who deny the reality or danger of the climate emergency should be
ignored. Obviously, I have broken my own rule here, but only to make
this vital point once and for all.
The science is clear, the severity understood at the highest levels
everywhere, and serious debates about what to do are turning into
action. The deniers have nothing to contribute to this.
However infuriating they are, arguing with them or debunking their
theories is likely only to generate publicity or money for them. It also
helps to generate a fake air of controversy over climate action that
provides cover for the vested interests seeking to delay the end of the
fossil fuel age.
But the deniers are not all the same. They tend to fit into one of four
different categories: the shill, the grifter, the egomaniac and the
ideological fool.
The shill is the easiest to understand. He, and it almost always is he,
is paid by vested interests to emit clouds of confusion about the
science or economics of climate action. This uncertainty creates a
smokescreen behind which polluters can lobby against measures that cut
their profits.
A sadder case is that of the grifters. They have found themselves
earning a living by grinding out contrarian articles for rightwing media
outlets. Do they actually believe the guff they write? It doesn't
matter: they just warm their hands on the outrage, count the clicks and
wait for the pay cheque.
The egomaniacs are also tragic figures. They are disappointed,
frustrated people whose careers have stalled and who can't understand
why the world refuses to give full reverence to their brilliance. They
are desperate for recognition, and, when it stubbornly refuses to
arrive, they are drawn to make increasingly extreme pronouncements, in
the hope of finally being proved a dogma-busting, 21st-century Galileo.
The ideological fool is the fourth type of climate denier, and they can
be intelligent. But they are utterly blinded by their inane, no-limits
version of the free-market creed. The climate emergency requires
coordinated global action, they observe, and that looks horribly like
communism in disguise.
They could explore the many credible climate action plans being pursued,
including by those on the political right. But their cognitive
dissonance forces them to the conclusion that because state intervention
is wrong, acting to avert climate danger cannot be right. Intellectual
gymnastics to "expose" climate alarmism then follow naturally.
But why do I say ignore them all? The climate crisis is urgent, and we
need debate to drive action. However, vigorous debates over action are
already taking place in good faith all over the world, from the tops of
governments to the smallest local action groups.
Every nation in the world signed up to the 2015 Paris climate deal,
pledging to keep global heating below 2C and ideally to 1.5C. The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change involves thousands of
international scientists and is arguably the greatest scientific
endeavour in history. It has spent three decades spelling out in
painstaking detail how humanity is causing global heating, how
catastrophic that threatens to be - and how drastic action is required
to avert the worst.
The world of finance and business is catching up fast with the science,
and almost all the technology needed already exists. In short, no sane
or serious actor can countenance denial of climate danger. Bad-faith
arguments motivated by greed, egomania or ideology have nothing to add.
Which brings me to the US president, Donald Trump. Political leaders are
the exception to the rule. Their climate idiocy should be challenged, as
they hold actual power. But even in this case, reality is fast debunking
their proclamations.
In the US, coal is dying, because green energy is cheaper and cleaner,
however great Trump claims he will make the miners. Even if Trump, and
Brazil's president, Jair Bolsonaro, persist, other nations will begin to
ostracise them via trade sanctions and border taxes.
As for the shill, grifter, egomaniac and ideological fool, the reality
of increasing climate impacts and successful action is fast exposing
them as well. Those willing to employ the shills and the grifters are
dwindling.
The book I started with has now been knocked off the environmental
bestsellers list, fittingly enough by one published by the environmental
hero Rachel Carson, in 1951. I can't profess to know what
Shellenberger's motivation was, but one thing is clear: the egomaniacs
and ideological fools will get the place in history they so lust for. It
will be a small footnote marking the useful idiots of the climate war.
-- Damian Carrington is the Guardian's Environment editor
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/30/climate-denier-shill-global-debate
[Wonderful images too]
*How Killer Whales are Changing the Arctic*
Jun 12, 2020
Terra Mater
Life in the frozen North is changing. Due to climate change, seasonal
pack ice extends much less than it previously did, meaning that once
closed-off waterways like Eclipse Sound are now open to visitors almost
all year round. And when those visitors are highly skilled predators
like killer whales, the entire ecosystem could be turned on its head...
Shot in the Canadian Arctic, our latest video explores the effect that
rising sea temperatures are having on iconic polar species like orcas
and narwhals. We explore the importance of ice in shaping local
ecosystems and find out why killer whales are the perfect predators.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsAfZxyw3r0
[Digging back into the internet news archive]
*On this day in the history of global warming - August 2, 2006 *
Republican televangelist Pat Robertson calls for action on human-caused
climate change, a position he would abandon several years later.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2006/08/03/6719/robertson-global-warming/
http://youtu.be/zxT0Nug1XqY
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
*** Privacy and Security:*This is a text-only mailing that carries no
images which may originate from remote servers. Text-only messages
provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20200802/90921d87/attachment.html>
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list