[TheClimate.Vote] May 31, 2020 - Daily Global Warming News Digest.

Richard Pauli richard at theclimate.vote
Sun May 31 09:51:26 EDT 2020


/*May 31, 2020*/

[Why follow money]
*Why Is the Fed Spending So Much Money on a Dying Industry?*
It should not be directing money to further entrench the carbon economy.
By Sarah Bloom Raskin - Ms. Raskin is a former member of the board of 
governors of the Federal Reserve.

The coronavirus pandemic has laid bare just how vulnerable the United 
States is to sudden, catastrophic shocks. Climate change poses the next 
big threat. Ignoring it, particularly to the benefit of fossil fuel 
interests, is a risk we can't afford.

 From my time as a Federal Reserve governor and then deputy Treasury 
secretary, I've learned that times like this not only can determine our 
ability to recover from a crisis but can also help inoculate us against 
the next one. That's why it is imperative that we make investments now 
that will increase the resilience of our economy.

The Fed is singularly poised to seed strategic investments in future 
economic stability. Oil, gas and coal companies are set or are seeking 
to receive billions in federal aid -- including at least $3.9 billion 
from the Paycheck Protection Program and at least $1.9 billion in tax 
credits tucked into the CARES Act passed by Congress. Their allies in 
Congress and the administration have lobbied for changes to several of 
the Fed's lending programs, including relaxing the Main Street Lending 
Program. Among those eligible for government assistance are many fossil 
fuel companies that were in deep financial trouble long before the 
pandemic began...
- - -
Last week, five economists released a survey of more than 200 finance 
ministers, central bankers and economists from Group of 20 countries. 
Their recommendations were unequivocal: The best long-term recovery 
plans will also be the plans that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

In the United States, this dynamic has already become apparent. 
Renewable energy in the past few years has been shown to directly and 
indirectly generate roughly three times as many jobs as a comparable 
investment in fossil fuels. Jobs in clean energy, such as wind 
technicians and solar installers, are the fastest growing of any 
industry in the country, and over the past five years, employment in the 
clean energy industry has grown 70 percent faster than the economy overall.

This pandemic has illustrated the staggering costs of failing to prepare 
for known risks. And the magnitude of the crisis has been made so much 
worse by the flight from science and the elevation of narrow private 
interests over the national common good.

But it also provides an unexpected opportunity to build an economy that 
is stronger in the long term. The decisions that the Fed makes today 
will go a long way to determining whether tomorrow's economy is one that 
remains susceptible to more chaos and vulnerability or builds economic 
security and resilience.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/28/opinion/fed-fossil-fuels.html#click=https://t.co/xOYUdhit3c 




[Canadian courts rule]
*Canadian Court Slams Trump Climate Advisor in Successful Libel Case*
By Richard Littlemore - Wednesday, May 27, 2020

Climate science denier and Trump transition team advisor Dr. Tim Ball, 
who a Canadian court earlier derided as incompetent, ill-intended, and 
apparently indifferent to the truth, has been further rebuffed in the 
British Columbia Court of Appeal and must now stand libel for a 
9-year-old attack against prominent Canadian climate scientist (and 
outgoing BC Green Party leader) Dr. Andrew Weaver.

Ball, a retired geography professor who for almost two decades has been 
giving lectures and media interviews in Canada and around the world 
denying the science of climate change, actually "won" this case when it 
was decided in the British Columbia Supreme Court in 2018. In January 
2011, Ball had attacked Weaver on the populist website, Canada Free 
Press, in an article that BC Supreme Court Justice Ronald Skolrood later 
described as "poorly written," and "rife with errors and inaccuracies, 
which suggests a lack of attention to detail on Dr. Ball's part, if not 
an indifference to the truth."

Yet, while finding that Ball had clearly set out to publicly question 
Weaver's competence and trash his reputation -- "It is quite apparent 
that this was Dr. Ball's intent" -- Justice Skolrood still let him off 
the hook, saying, "Simply put, a reasonably thoughtful and informed 
person who reads the Article is unlikely to place any stock in Dr. 
Ball's views."

This disdain Ball claimed as a vindication, calling the decision "a 
victory for free speech and a blow against the use of the law to silence 
people."

Weaver appealed the free pass and Ball's celebration ended late last 
month, when a three-judge panel of the BC Court of Appeal found that 
while the busy climate contrarian is free to speak, he is nevertheless 
accountable for the sting in his words, giving Weaver ultimate 
vindication...
more at - 
https://www.desmogblog.com/2020/05/27/canadian-court-slams-trump-climate-advisor-successful-libel-case?utm_source=DeSmog%20Weekly%20Newsletter



[audio - Best of the Left - Michael Moore controversy precisely 
deconstructed ]
*Bonus Edition #208 Planet of the Humans from Michael Moore, Explained*

Complete broadcast here 
https://www.bestoftheleft.com/bonus_edition_208_planet_of_the_humans_from_michael_moore_explained

download - 
https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/hippiesympathizer/Bonus_Show_208_Public_-_5-15-20_16.30.mp3

*SHOW NOTES*

    00:00:00 Ch. 1: Intro and Index
    00:06:12 Ch. 2: Planet of the Humans DEBUNKED Part 1:
    Misrepresenting Solar Science - Now You Know - Air Date 5-8-20
    00:11:44 Ch. 3: Planet of the Humans DEBUNKED Part 2: Ignoring New
    Renewable Solutions to Intermittency - Now You Know - Air Date 5-8-20

    00:17:12 Michael Moore, filmmakers respond to criticism of new
    bombshell environmental film Part 1: No Defense of Their Bad Science
    - The Hill Rising - Air Date 4-28-20

    00:20:10 Ch. 4: Michael Moore, filmmakers respond to criticism of
    new bombshell environmental film Part 2: All the Good Points the
    Film Failed to Make - The Hill Rising - Air Date 4-28-20

    00:24:03 Ch. 5: Michael Moore, filmmakers respond to criticism of
    new bombshell environmental film Part 3: Population Control? - The
    Hill Rising - Air Date 4-28-20

    00:28:39 Ch. 6: The Climate Conversation has Been Imploded

    00:31:04 Ch. 7: The Reason Population Reduction is Not the Answer to
    Our Climate Emergency

    00:33:01 Ch. 8: The Mechanics of Making a Bad Documentary -
    Manipulative Editing

    00:34:44 Ch. 9: The Mechanics of Making a Bad Documentary - Poor
    Interview Sourcing

    00:36:28 Ch. 10: Poor Interview Sourcing, Misleading Data: The GM
    Volt Launch

    00:39:02 Ch. 11: The Mechanics of Making a Bad Documentary - No
    Follow-Up Interviews

    00:46:12 Ch. 12: The Mechanics of Making a Bad Documentary - Bad
    Data by Ignoring Innovation

    00:47:21 Ch. 13: The Mechanics of Making a Bad Documentary -
    Artificially Inflating Small Issues to Seem Large

    00:48:52 Ch. 14: The Mechanics of Making a Bad Documentary - We're
    Just Asking Questions

    00:49:30 Ch. 15: The Mechanics of Making a Bad Documentary -
    Terrible Graphs and Visuals

    00:52:55 Ch. 16: The Mechanics of Making a Bad Documentary - Silly
    Anecdotes

    00:54:13 Ch. 17: The Mechanics of Making a Bad Documentary -
    Assuming Makes an Ass Out of You and Me

    00:57:16 Ch. 18: Comparing Mountain-Top Wind Farms to
    Mountain-Top-Removal Coal Mining is Unconscionable

    00:58:39 Ch. 19: The Mechanics of Making a Bad Documentary - Making
    Arguments in Nonsensical Ways

    01:00:58 Ch. 20: White Men Fail to Discuss Reproductive Justice or
    Environmental Justice in Any Way

    01:02:01 Ch. 21: EVs, Green Energy in Michael Moore's Confused New
    Documentary Planet Of The Humans - Transport Evolved - Air Date 4-29-20

    01:04:47 Ch. 22: The Film Leaves Viewers With a Conclusion the
    Filmmakers Didn't Intend

    01:05:43 Ch. 23: The Film Doesn't Speak to Anyone Advocating a New
    Way of Living

    01:07:53 Ch. 24: Who is Benefitting and Who is Being Hurt By This Film?

    01:12:00 Ch. 25: Planet of the Humans DEBUNKED Part 3: Emboldened
    Deniers - Now You Know - Air Date 5-8-20

    01:14:53 Ch. 26: Right-Wing Media LOVES This Film: The Left 'has
    attacked' Michael Moore for his 'Planet Human' documentary - Sky
    News Australia - Air Date 4-27-20

    01:17:03 Ch. 27: Debunking the Idea that Anyone Ever Called for the
    Film to be Banned

    01:18:07 Ch. 28: The Damage to the Climate Movement: The Problem
    With "Planet Of The Humans" Part. 1 ft. Joshua Kahn Russell -
    Michael Brooks Show - Air Date 5-7-20

    01:24:16 Ch. 29: Attempting to Make Good Points About the
    Neoliberalism at the Heart of the Climate Movement but Completely
    Botching it

    01:28:28 Ch. 30: The Producers Defend the Use of Bad Science by
    Asserting that Science Doesn't Matter

    01:30:00 Ch. 31: Michael Moore in a live discussion with Extinction
    Rebellion co-founder Clare Farrell Part 1 - Extinction Rebellion -
    Air Date 5-5-20

    01:32:03 Ch. 32: Science is Foundational to Their Arguments but Also
    Doesn't Matter

    01:34:14 Ch. 33: Michael Moore in a live discussion with Extinction
    Rebellion co-founder Clare Farrell Part 2 - Extinction Rebellion -
    Air Date 5-5-20

    01:35:56 Ch. 34: Fostering Conspiratorial Thinking

    01:37:50 Ch. 35: Scientists are Religious, Only we Know the Truth:
    Michael Moore in a live discussion with Extinction Rebellion
    co-founder Clare Farrell Part 3 - Extinction Rebellion - Air Date 5-5-20

    01:40:43 Ch. 36: Naïve, Wishful Thinking is Not a Thesis

    01:42:22 Ch. 37: How to Make an Argument that Centers the Need to
    Reduce Consumption

    01:44:50 Ch. 38: Michael Moore Proves His Profound Ignorance:
    Michael Moore in a live discussion with Extinction Rebellion
    co-founder Clare Farrell Part 4 - Extinction Rebellion - Air Date 5-5-20

    01:45:54 Ch. 39: Explaining Moore's Deep Ignorance

    01:50:32 Ch. 40: The Need to Trust in Experts, Not Buffoons

    01:51:14 Ch. 41: Accidental Eugenics Leads Predictably to Deeply
    Racist Outcomes

    01:54:42 Ch. 42: Why Focusing on Over-Population is Not the Solution
    to Our Climate Emergency

    01:57:02 Ch. 43: Sunrise Movement Response to the Film

    01:59:08 Ch. 44: Response to the Film by Michael Moore's Former
    Fact-Checker

    02:01:33 Ch. 45: Extinction Rebellion Response to the Film

    02:02:57 Ch. 46: Why We Need to Debunk This Film

Complete broadcast here 
https://www.bestoftheleft.com/bonus_edition_208_planet_of_the_humans_from_michael_moore_explained



[Plan ahead]
*A rising tide of marine disease? How parasites respond to a warming world*
by Dan Dinicola, University of Washington

Warming events are increasing in magnitude and severity, threatening 
many ecosystems worldwide. As the global temperatures continue to climb, 
it also raises uncertainties as to the relationship, prevalence, and 
spread of parasites and disease.

A recent study from the University of Washington explores the ways 
parasitism will respond to climate change, providing researchers new 
insights into disease transmission. The paper was published May 18 in 
Trends in Ecology and Evolution.

The review builds upon previous research by adding nearly two decades of 
new evidence to build a framework showing the parasite-host relationship 
under climate oscillations. Traditionally, climate-related research is 
done over long timescales, however this unique approach examines how 
increasingly frequent "pulse warming" events alter parasite transmission.

"Much of what is known about how organisms and ecosystems can respond to 
climate change has focused on gradual warming," said lead author 
Danielle Claar, a postdoctoral researcher at the UW School of Aquatic 
and Fishery Sciences. "Climate change causes not only gradual warming 
over time, but also increases the frequency and magnitude of extreme 
events, like heat waves."

Claar explained that both gradual warming and pulse warming can and have 
influenced ecosystems, but do so in different ways. Organisms may be 
able to adapt and keep pace with the gradual warming, but an acute pulse 
event can have sudden and profound impacts.

A sea star ravaged by sea star wasting disease. Credit: Alison Leigh Lilly
The 2013-2015 "blob" is one such extreme heat pulse event which has been 
linked to a massive die-off of sea stars along the Pacific coast of the 
U.S. and Canada. Many species of sea stars, including the large 
sunflower sea star, were decimated by a sudden epidemic of wasting 
disease. Five years later, populations in the region are still 
struggling to recover. The abnormally warm waters associated with the 
blob are thought to have favored the spread of the sea star-associated 
densovirus, the suggested cause of the disease.

The authors compare the prevalence of these marine diseases to a rising 
tide, an ebbing tide, or a tsunami. Disease transmission can rise or ebb 
in concert with gradual warming or a series of pulse warming events. 
However, a severe pulse warming event could result in a tsunami, 
"initiating either a deluge or drought of disease," as was observed with 
sea stars along the Pacific Northwest.

However, not all pulse heat events will cause the same response. What 
may benefit a particular parasite or host in one system can be 
detrimental in another. Warming can alter a parasite's life cycle, limit 
the range of suitable host species, or even impair the host's immune 
response. Some flatworms which target wildlife and humans cannot survive 
as long in warmer waters, decreasing their window for infecting a host. 
Another recent UW study found that parasites commonly found in sushi are 
on the rise with their numbers increasing 283-fold in the past 40 years, 
though the relationship between heat pulse events and their abundance is 
not yet clear.

"The relationships between hosts, parasites, and their corresponding 
communities are complex and depend on many factors, making outcomes 
difficult to predict," said Claar, who recommends researchers make 
predictions on a case-by-case basis for their individual systems.

The authors conclude that rather than a straightforward tidal 
prediction, they would expect pulse warming to cause "choppy seas with 
the occasional rogue wave."

"It is important that we are able to understand and predict how 
parasitism and disease might respond to climate change, so we can 
prepare for, and mitigate, potential impacts to human and wildlife 
health," said Claar.

The paper's co-author is Chelsea Wood, a UW assistant professor of 
aquatic and fishery sciences.
https://phys.org/news/2020-05-tide-marine-disease-parasites-world.html



[rising to meet the challenge]
*The climate challenges facing the helicopter industry*
May 29, 2020 by Ed Brotak
It seems like every day, there is new data describing the climate change 
our planet is experiencing. The latest five-year period, 2015-2019, will 
almost certainly be the warmest on record (records go back into the late 
1800s). According to figures from the World Meteorological Organization, 
the global average temperature has increased by 1.1C since the start of 
the Industrial Revolution, with nearly 20 percent of the increase in the 
past five years. Scientists started using the term "climate change" 
rather than "global warming" recently. This was to warn people that, 
yes, the Earth is getting warmer -- but there are many other 
environmental events occurring that must be acknowledged.
Although the Earth's climate has continuously changed throughout the 
planet's history, the changes we are seeing today are, for the first 
time, the result of human activities. These changes are also occurring 
at a speed we have never seen before – an estimated 10 to 20 times 
faster than previously observed.

Much of the attention has been focused on efforts to reduce greenhouse 
gas emissions, which contribute to the warming and resultant 
environmental impacts. As witnessed with the Paris Accord, political and 
economic concerns have resulted in a less-than-maximum effort in this area.

The aviation industry has faced significant pressure to reduce emissions 
from aircraft engines. It takes a considerable amount of power and fuel 
to defy gravity and travel at great speeds. Consequently, aircraft 
produce a disproportionate amount of carbon dioxide compared to 
land-based vehicles.

The helicopter industry has joined with other branches of the aviation 
business in taking steps to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. More 
fuel-efficient engines have been developed and will have an increasing 
effect as older helicopters are replaced with newer models. The 
aerodynamics of the airframe can be improved to reduce drag. The 
efficiency of the rotor blades can be improved. Internally, the electric 
and heating systems can be designed to run more efficiently, decreasing 
power consumption.

More efficient operations in terms of scheduling will also help. An 
overall reduction in passenger air travel would certainly reduce 
emissions, but this would go against recent trends and would have 
serious economic effects on the industry.

One of the most anticipated advances is alternative propulsion. This 
would encompass entirely electric powered or hybrid models. The major 
challenge to date has been how to generate enough power to attain the 
lift and speeds necessary for flight. Still in the developmental stage, 
electric helicopters have proven the concept, but there is still the 
problem of providing such power over extended time periods. For example, 
a Robinson R44 converted into a purely electric helicopter set a world 
record in December 2018 when it flew for 22 minutes, covering 34.5 miles 
at a speed of 80 knots. Battery power and capacity will have to be 
increased -- without requiring prohibitive extra weight -- for electric 
helicopters to become a viable proposition.

*Adapting to the change*
The push to reduce the emissions that are fueling climate change is just 
one aspect of the problem. The aviation industry is also having to adapt 
to the significant environmental changes that are impacting operations 
in a number of ways. And these changes will only become greater over time.

So, how has and how will climate change directly affect helicopter 
operations?

The most direct impact of the rise in temperatures is on helicopter 
flight performance. Warmer air is less dense, causing rotor blades to 
produce less lift and engine power output to be reduced. In more extreme 
situations, both passenger and cargo loads will have to be lessened, 
while the hottest times of the day may become unusable for work. The 
risk of high-density altitude incidents will increase.
Warmer air can also hold more moisture, and moist air is less dense than 
dry air. Although not as important as air temperature, this can magnify 
the effects described above. Warmer temperatures and more moisture in 
the air mean that when precipitation does occur, rainfall and snowfall 
rates will be greater, with subsequent reductions in visibility.

With more energy, storms will become more numerous and stronger. There 
will be more and stronger thunderstorms with all their attendant 
hazards; while winter storms will be more intense, with higher winds and 
heavier precipitation. Tropical cyclones will become more numerous and 
stronger, and we could see more dust and sandstorms in the subtropics. 
In a previous article (Vertical, April/May 2018), I discussed how 
turbulence may increase.

In terms of aviation facilities, although not dependent on long runways, 
helicopters still need a stable, flat surface for take-offs and 
landings. If the landing area is paved with asphalt, melting can occur 
with the higher temperatures that are becoming more common. In high 
latitudes, the melting of subsurface permafrost can cause buckling of 
paved landing areas.

Another concern for any aviation facility along a coastal area is 
sea-level rise. Thermal expansion of the increasingly warm water was a 
major factor in rising levels in the past. But today, the rapid melting 
of glaciers and polar ice sheets are seen as responsible for two-thirds 
of the sea level rise since 2005. Sea levels are now at their highest 
levels ever recorded (records go back to 1900). The rate of-sea level 
rise is also accelerating.

*Sector outlooks*
We can speculate about the broader impacts of climate change on the 
helicopter industry. For one, wildfires have been increasing around the 
world. These are more numerous, more intense, and more destructive, as 
witnessed recently in California and Australia. We are also seeing fires 
where we have never seen them before, especially in higher latitudes. 
The wildfire-fighting component of the industry should see increases in 
demand.

With the increase in the number and severity of storms, there will be a 
greater demand for search-and-rescue operations, as demonstrated last 
year with Hurricane Dorian in the Bahamas. In terms of relief efforts, 
we have seen that often only helicopters can access affected areas to 
transport people and supplies.
As for helicopter tourism, any increase in inclement weather would 
certainly hamper operations. There is also a concern that some scenic 
locations are being adversely affected by the changing climate. In lower 
latitudes, coral reefs are struggling to survive in increasingly warmer 
waters, while coastal flooding is occurring more frequently, even 
without storms, in such diverse locations as Florida and Venice, Italy. 
Further poleward, snowpacks are diminishing and glaciers are melting, 
impacting winter sports and tourist attractions.

The fossil fuel industry is, of course, directly tied to the climate 
change issue. If there was a major push to replace fossil fuels with 
renewable energy sources, the supporting industry would suffer. 
Currently, there is little indication that this will happen on a large 
scale. Although offshore operations have been reduced in recent years, 
they remain a significant part of the helicopter industry. This could 
well be "ground zero" for climate change effects. Energy infrastructure, 
including offshore drilling sites and coastal refineries, will be at 
risk. The relentless and accelerating rise in sea level will bring 
flooding concerns to the refineries and various problems to the drilling 
rigs. More frequent and stronger storms will add to these risks.

In researching a previous article on agricultural operations (Vertical, 
August/September 2017) I spoke to several operators who told me they 
have already noted the effects of climate change. Growing seasons have 
begun earlier, some by a month or more; frost prevention assignments 
have had to change accordingly. Aerial applications (spraying of 
chemicals) was noted to be extremely dependent on temperature, which is 
changing constantly. Even the type of crops grown may have been or will 
be altered to fit new climate norms.

What about the future? The Earth's temperature is rapidly approaching 
what it was over 100,000 years ago, when there were no permanent ice 
caps and the sea level was eight meters higher than today. Historical 
data indicates that recently measured CO2 levels of 400 ppm last 
occurred three million years ago. Not only was it much warmer, but the 
world itself was not as we know it today -- the sea level was estimated 
to be 32 to 130 feet (10 to 40 meters) higher than now. If this occured 
today, every coastal city on the planet would be flooded.

"A multi-disciplinary research effort by scientists, meteorologists, 
climatologists, engineers, biologists, and epidemiologists is needed to 
understand better the impacts of the changing climate on the entire 
aviation system, including aircraft and infrastructure," the 
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) concluded in its 2016 
Environmental Report. "Thereafter, dedicated guidance material by ICAO 
could target climate adaptation correlated issues, based on models of 
best practice. It will be important for that guidance material to be 
regularly revised and updated, to keep it in sync with the evolving and 
non-stationary climate statistics."

The aviation community, including the helicopter component, has been 
slow to address the issue of climate change's effects on operations. But 
the reality is that, no matter what steps are taken now to reduce global 
warming, the effects of this climate change are already occurring and 
will only get more pronounced.
https://www.verticalmag.com/features/the-climate-challenges-facing-the-helicopter-industry/



[Digging back into the internet news archive]
*On this day in the history of global warming - May 31, 1992 *
The Boston Globe's Ross Gelbspan reports:

    "Many researchers believe that the most pressing global
    environmental problem is also the hardest to document and the most
    controversial -- the potential for a catastrophic increase in the
    planet's temperature. Such scientists as Stephen H. Schneider of the
    National Center for Atmospheric Research predict that average
    temperatures, driven up by an exponential buildup of carbon dioxide
    and other heat-trapping gases in the upper atmosphere, will rise by
    3 to 8 degrees Fahrenheit by the year 2050. By comparison,
    temperatures were only 4 degrees lower at the end of the great Ice
    Age 10,000 years ago.

    "While this 'greenhouse effect' is mostly due to the burning of oil
    and coal in power plants, factories and automobiles, its effects are
    multiplied by the dizzying rate at which carbon-dioxide-absorbing
    trees are being cut down in the tropical rain forests of Brazil,
    Borneo and Indonesia, as well as in dry forests in temperate
    latitudes. In Brazil alone, an area of rain forest as large as the
    state of Maine is leveled each year to make way for farming or
    economic development.

    "As a result, some researchers now expect that the amount of
    heat-trapping carbon dioxide, which has held steady at about 300
    parts per million throughout most of human history, will double in
    the next 50 years.

    "That prospect has scientists depicting a range of dire scenarios
    occurring within the lifetime of today's children."

[Check the Boston Globe archive or see more Ross Gelbspan at - 
http://www.heatisonline.org/

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/


/Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote

/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
to news digest./

*** Privacy and Security:*This is a text-only mailing that carries no 
images which may originate from remote servers. Text-only messages 
provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic 
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote 
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, 
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for 
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct 
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List 
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to 
this mailing list.




More information about the TheClimate.Vote mailing list