[✔️] April 19, 2021 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Mon Apr 19 12:06:53 EDT 2021
/*April 19, 2021*
/
[video - MSNBC rediscovers Noam Chomsky and revives climate change coverage]
MEHDI ON MSNBC
*Legendary activist Noam Chomsky on Biden’s presidency and the modern GOP*
When it comes to climate change, there is always more to be done.
President Biden has signed an array of executive orders combating the
crisis, but the modern GOP’s stance makes it difficult to get long-term
legislation passed. Legendary political activist Noam Chomsky joins
NBC’s Mehdi Hasan to discuss the threat this position will have on the
future of our environment.
https://www.msnbc.com/mehdi-on-msnbc/watch/legendary-activist-noam-chomsky-on-biden-s-presidency-and-the-modern-gop-110429765669
[most mainstream media has been ignoring Noam Chomsky]
[well, duh]
*Researchers see links between renewable energy and improved health*
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/548594-researchers-see-links-between-renewable-energy-and-improved-health?rl=1
[vertical axis wind energy could be put along our freeways- video]
*A vertical axis wind turbine without the wind! How do they do that?*
Apr 18, 2021
Just Have a Think
Wind turbines are everywhere nowadays, and they do a great job of
harnessing all that free energy. But as a restless species constantly on
the move, we humans also cause many other air flows through our
activities. And most of it just goes to waste. What if we could scoop
that air up and do something useful with it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcSnwW5v3f8
[Wildfires]
*What the megadrought in the West means for wildfire season*
Get your air filter ready — wildfire season is likely to start early
this year.
By Lili Pikelili - Apr 15, 2021
- -
The warning signs are written in the parched landscape from New Mexico
to California. This time last year, 27 percent of the West was in
drought — now that has risen to 76 percent, turning forests into
matchsticks.
With the pandemic dominating headlines, the severe drought has gotten
little attention. “This one threatens to catch people by surprise who
are exhausted by the events of the past year,” said Daniel Swain, a
climate scientist at the University of California Los Angeles...
- -
It’s time to get your air filter out and keep those masks handy...
- -
The Fire Center projects that the Southwest will see above-average fire
potential through June until the monsoon (hopefully) arrives. But the
region might still get relief from summer monsoon rains, whereas the
coming months tend to be dry in central and northern California.
Starting in June, they project that parts of the Pacific Northwest will
see heightened fire risk and then the fire season will pick up in
California in July...
- -
However, Swain also cautioned that the number of acres burned shouldn’t
be the sole criterion for how severe a fire season is. Western states
actually have a major backlog of land that needs to be burned, due to
the history of limiting the use of fire to manage forests (“prescribed
burning”) — an approach that American Indians have historically practiced.
“The goal is not to vanquish fire from the landscape. The goal really
should be to decouple wildfire from catastrophe,” he said. Therefore, he
suggests we judge our management of fires by their impact on structures
and human health, rather than just acres burned.
*
**We must burn the West to save it*
Just two weeks ago, California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced a deal to
allocate $536 million to help the state manage wildfires by staffing up
fire crews, thinning forests, and hardening homes to withstand fires.
Newsom has proposed a total of $1 billion in spending on fire management
this year.
“This is a good start, but this is only Year One,” Michael Wara, the
director of the climate and energy policy program at Stanford’s Woods
Institute for the Environment, told the Los Angeles Times. “We need
sustained funding at this scale and maybe even larger for a decade.”
With the fire season rapidly approaching, residents of Western states
can get ahead of the smoke by dusting off their air filters, stocking up
on N95 respirator masks, and consulting this preparation checklist from
the Environmental Protection Agency. In the meantime, it’s a good time
to get outside before the fire season truly descends upon us again...
https://www.vox.com/2021/4/14/22382445/california-wildfires-2021-drought-megadrought-climate-change-gavin-newsom-new-mexico
[fun to view how it makes the planet feel smaller, faster changing]
*A planetary-scale platform for Earth science data & analysis*
Powered by Google's cloud infrastructure
Ready-To-Use Datasets
The public data archive includes more than thirty years of historical
imagery and scientific datasets, updated and expanded daily. It contains
over twenty petabytes of geospatial data instantly available for analysis.
https://earthengine.google.com/timelapse/
- -
[high geek factor]
*A planetary-scale platform for Earth science data & analysis*
Earth Engine's public data archive includes more than forty years of
historical imagery and scientific datasets, updated and expanded daily.
https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/
[who are those people?]
*Private Security Firm Accused of Working Illegally to Protect Oil and
Gas Pipelines in Five States*
While pipeline protesters risk harsh new penalties enacted in various
states, security companies hired to police fossil fuel projects are
operating with little oversight.
Karen Savageon - Apr 16, 2021
Leighton Security Services, a private security company accused of
working without a license during construction of the controversial
Dakota Access pipeline, is facing similar allegations in Virginia.
The complaint against Leighton is one of two recently filed against
private companies providing security for the Mountain Valley pipeline, a
planned 300-mile pipeline that would carry fracked gas from northwestern
West Virginia, through pristine mountain streams and Appalachian
forests, to the Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company’s (Transco)
compressor station in southern Virginia.
The complaints were filed anonymously in January with the state’s
Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) and shared with DeSmog.
Virginia officials have confirmed to DeSmog that investigations are ongoing.
According to one complaint, Leighton has subcontracted MVP security work
to another unlicensed firm, The North Group, Inc., as well as to two
unlicensed individuals. A second complaint seeks to hold The North Group
directly responsible for operating without a license.
Leighton owner James Kevin Mayberry denied the allegations to DeSmog,
but acknowledged that the company was hired to provide security by
Precision Pipeline, a business subcontracted by MVP to build the
pipeline, and in turn subcontracted the work to The North Group.
“In most cases, a security license is required to subcontract with
another company,” Leon D. Baker, Jr., the director of Virginia’s
licensing agency, said in email. “If they do, the subcontractor must
also be licensed by DCJS.”
The North Group co-owner Steven Hernandez has acknowledged to DeSmog
that TNG and Leighton “have a relationship minimally.” But he denies
that TNG has worked unlicensed in Virginia. “The North Group uses
licensed subcontract vendors and performs work within accordance with
all state and federal regulations,” said Hernandez, who declined to name
the subcontractors used by TNG.
A recent posting to the online job board Indeed.com appears to be from
The North Group. The opening is for an unarmed protection agent in
Roanoke, Virginia. Jobs in Michigan and Minnesota, where TNG is licensed
to provide security services, are also listed. Hernandez did not respond
to questions regarding the postings.
The Mountain Valley pipeline has drawn fierce opposition from landowners
and environmental activists in both West Virginia and Virginia, where
police recently forcibly extracted and arrested two protesters from a
tree sit after they blocked construction for two and a half years.
Emily Satterwhite, a vocal pipeline opponent who says she has drawn the
attention of private security agents at rallies and protests against the
pipeline, finds the allegations against Leighton and TNG alarming. “To
know that there are people like that who feel like they’re operating —
and are operating — under the radar, it’s infuriating, but it’s also
frightening,” she said.
Satterwhite, an associate professor of Appalachian studies and popular
culture at Virginia Tech, says men in unmarked white trucks have used
“intimidation tactics” by following her and other pipeline opponents
around town at all hours.
Satterwhite doesn’t know who the men are. But the situation gives her
pause. “If we don’t even know who they are and who they’re working for,
and they have no licensing concerns, what might they do?” she said. “If
I had a complaint about my treatment, where would I go and who would
respond?”
*Little Accountability for Pipeline Security Firms, New Crackdowns for
Protesters*
The Virginia allegations against Leighton highlight how inconsistently
states regulate and monitor private security firms that cater to the
fossil fuel industry. Potential penalties are seldom hefty enough to
deter companies that have been caught violating licensing regulations in
one state from skirting licensing requirements in another. Many
substantiated complaints are never prosecuted by state authorities.
“Presently, there is no universal manner in which security companies and
their individual security practitioners are handled from state to
state,” said Fabian Blache III, the director of Louisiana’s private
security licensing board, and president of the International Association
of Security and Investigative Regulators (IASIR). “When you have the
ones that just blatantly work without a license and you’re constantly
chasing them around from place to place to place, it’s very frustrating.”
While some states require both the firm and its individual employees to
be licensed, others limit the requirement to the company only. A handful
allow any private security firm with a general business license to
operate with no further oversight. The lack of consistency between
states can be confusing to firms, said Blache, but he contended that
most companies do their best to adhere to the law.
The penalties for operating without a license vary from state to state,
but tend to be relatively light. While it’s a felony in Michigan,
punishable by up to four years in prison, fines of up to $1,000, or
both, Virginia considers it a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in
prison, a fine of up to $2,500, or both. Licensing violations are also
misdemeanors in North Dakota, punishable by up to 30 days in prison, a
fine of up to $1,500, or both.
While state licensing rules for private security companies seem to have
changed little in the years since the violent attacks by police and
private security on Dakota Access pipeline opponents in 2016-17,
multiple states have decided to criminalize anti-pipeline protests. At
least 20 states have passed or introduced harsh new laws that make it a
felony to protest at pipeline construction sites and other critical
infrastructure. Individuals found guilty face felony convictions, long
prison sentences, and fines running into the thousands of dollars.
Critics of these laws, which have often been based on model legislation
developed by the fossil fuel-friendly American Legislative Exchange
Council, say they infringe on the First Amendment right to protest.
Blache believes that the key to forcing companies to comply with
licensing laws is to ensure there are criminal penalties for offenders,
and to empower state regulatory agencies to conduct active enforcement.
“If you have criminal penalties in your statute, and your individual
inspectors have the authority to arrest, it’s a game-changer,” he said,
“because you can now show up through the inspection, determine [a
company’s] unlicensed, and cuff them and take them.”
The information that private security firms file with state regulators
is not regularly shared across states. While some states have easily
searchable databases, others do not, making it difficult for licensing
agencies in other states or the public to research a company’s history.
Regulators considering license applications are often forced to conduct
time — and resource — intensive investigations, piecing together a
company’s history one state at a time.
Firms trying to shirk a dubious history sometimes change names, owners,
or registered agents.
“If a regulator gets an application from somebody, you have to really
work it backwards,” Blache said. “You have to start with the individual
and do your research on the person … you’ve got to scrub social media,
Linked In, Facebook, Instagram, all these different tools that are out
there to find the connectivity points between the individuals in the
previous companies.”
*
**Leighton Licensing Questions Span Five States*
Leighton, which is based in Texas, has also been accused of operating
without a license in North Dakota, Michigan, Iowa, and Ohio.
It was a Leighton employee who pointed an AR-15 rifle at Indigenous
water protectors blocking construction of the Dakota Access pipeline in
2016. The scene, captured on a widely circulated video, was one of
hundreds of brutal assaults that militarized private security forces
used against the activists and their supporters.
In the wake of those protests, North Dakota licensing regulators
investigated and filed separate administrative complaints against
Leighton and another private security firm named TigerSwan for operating
without state licenses. Although Leighton never admitted to any
wrongdoing, in 2019 the firm agreed to pay the state $43,500 in
administrative fees and costs. In exchange, the state agreed to drop the
complaint. The agreement stipulates that if Leighton applies in the
future for a private security license in North Dakota, the board can
consider “all available information, including actions taken as part of
the Dakota Access Pipeline construction and protests as part of its
licensure determination.”
In Iowa, Leighton subcontracted with Precision Pipeline to provide
“armed security by mobile, roving patrols,” despite not being licensed
in the state, according to internal situation reports compiled by
TigerSwan. Leighton was “basically coordinating with multiple law
enforcement agencies to provide off-duty law enforcement personnel
through the various departments,” stated one of the reports.
Iowa regulators confirmed to DeSmog that Leighton is not licensed to
provide security in that state.
“Private security guards are used by a lot — by far the majority — of
the critical infrastructure in this country,” said Laurel Rudd,
executive director of IASIR, the association of state regulators. “Do
you really not want to know the background of the person who you’re
hiring, whether it be criminal background or whether it be terrorist
affiliation?”
*Michigan: A Lesson in Bureaucracy*
Sometimes it takes doggedly persistent citizens to force states to
investigate.
In 2017, Michigan resident John Machowicz filed a complaint against
Leighton with state regulators, alleging that the company was providing
security services for the Rover pipeline project. Now completed, the
pipeline carries fracked gas more than 700 miles through West Virginia,
Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan.
“There have been several times when a security guard has gotten out of
the car and approached us about our legal right to document the pipeline
project,” Machowicz, a pipeline opponent, told state officials at the
time. “We are concerned that Leighton Security Services will get more
aggressive like the security firm Tiger Swan from the Dakota Access
pipeline.”
Leighton denied it was doing the work itself and told investigators it
had subcontracted with Professional Solutions Group (PSG) to provide
security personnel. In 2020 PSG merged with The North Group, the company
named with Leighton in the Virginia complaints. Both PSG and TNG are
licensed to provide security services in Michigan.
Initially, the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs
(LARA) found the complaintsunsubstantiated
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20616341-mi-investigation_76-77>,
because the state does not require firms that subcontract work to be
licensed.
Machowicz was undeterred. He next sent regulators photographs showing
Rover pipeline security personnel with “Leighton Security” emblazoned on
their vests, along with other information that he said proved Leighton
didn’t just subcontract, but directly employed individuals to provide
private security.
Machowicz also sent LARA troubling body camera footage, obtained through
a public records request. Inone recording
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNFBTSg0SrM>, two security men at a
Rover pipeline site in 2017 told a county sheriff’s deputy that they
worked for private companies, naming PSG and Leighton. “My boss is a
state trooper in Illinois,” the Leighton employee added, referring to
Gary Washburn, a full-timelieutenant
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/gary-washburn-b9810444/>with theIllinois
Secretary of State Police
<https://illinoiscomptroller.gov/financial-data/state-expenditures/employee-salary-database/employee-history/?Issue_Year=2020&EmpId=h2ADwPFOu1mZpXglH9WpoQ%3D%3D&Agency=SECRETARY%2520OF%2520STATE&Last_Name=WASHBURN&First_Name=GARY&Position=>who
was also employed by Leighton as anoperations manager
<https://napipelines.com/pipeline-protectors-physical-security-a-growing-necessity-for-jobsites/>.
Another showed <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GawlH8uWQbM>a sheriff’s
deputy responding to a call from a local resident in Washtenaw County,
Michigan, about a suspicious vehicle parked for hours in front of their
house. The man inside the vehicle identified himself as “part of the
Rover pipeline, with Leighton Security.” Such situations were not
uncommon at the time, Machowicz told LARA. “Residents commonly found
themselves scared away from public spaces by security personnel” and
treated like criminals,” even though they “limited their activities to
peaceful documentation.”
In 2019, state regulators re-opened their investigation and this time
substantiated the allegations. But instead of justice, Machowicz says,
he’s gotten a lesson in bureaucracy.
Under Michigan law, providing private security service while unlicensed
is a felony punishable by up to four years in prison, fines of up to
$1,000, or both. But like agencies in many states, LARA isn’t authorized
to pursue criminal charges. So state officials handed the Leighton case
off to officials in Washtenaw and Livingston counties, where the work
had occurred.
The prosecutor in Livingston County — where the sheriff’s office was on
Leighton’s payroll — shipped the case back to the state licensing
agency, insisting that LARA’s investigation was incomplete and provided
insufficient evidence that a crime had been committed. In Washtenaw
County, the prosecutors’ office told LARA it didn’t have the personnel
to investigate and suggested the agency forward the case to the
sheriff’s office.
A detective with the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office told Machowicz in
late 2019 that it was “not in a position to investigate this matter
appropriately.” He suggested that Machowicz ask the state attorney
general’s office or state police to step in.
A spokesperson with the Michigan attorney general’s office confirmed
that it is investigating Leighton’s operations in the state, but could
not provide further information because the matter is ongoing.
In the process of defending itself against the Michigan allegations, an
attorney for Leighton attempted to discredit a second complainant by
telling state investigators that the individual knew nothing about what
had happened in Michigan because he had only worked for Leighton in
Ohio. However, Leighton has never held a private security license in
Ohio, according to Jay Carey, a spokesman for the Ohio Department of
Public Safety.
Unlike Michigan, Ohio prohibits unlicensed firms from bidding on or
accepting a contract to provide security services regardless of whether
it subcontracts to another company.
“They’re soliciting business in this field, so they must be licensed,”
Carey said.
*Security and Insecurities*
Back in Virginia, Satterwhite said surveillance by MVP security left her
feeling unsafe in her own community.
“For at least a year, probably more, maybe two, I was just on edge all
the time, tense, looking to see is that white vehicle driving past my
house a security vehicle? Is that white vehicle that passed me on my
walk from my house to campus where I work a security vehicle?”
Satterwhite said.
While there is no guarantee that licensed security companies will
operate ethically, Satterwhite said companies that don’t bother to
obtain licensure pose a much bigger danger to the public.
“What’s somebody going to do if they don’t even have a license at risk?”
https://www.desmog.com/2021/04/16/dakota-access-rover-mvp-pipelines-leighton-security-license/
[5 min video on MSNBC]
*Greta Thunberg urges Biden to address the climate crisis*
Climate change activist Greta Thunburg joined MSNBC’s Mehdi Hasan to
share her thoughts on President Biden’s climate policy and what she
would like to see the President do when it comes to the environment.
“Treat the climate crisis like a crisis,” Thunberg said.
March 7, 2021
https://www.msnbc.com/mehdi-on-msnbc/watch/greta-thunberg-urges-biden-to-address-the-climate-crisis-102246469977
[how Koch is killing democracy]
*Inside the Koch-Backed Effort to Block the Largest Election-Reform Bill
in Half a Century*
On a leaked conference call, leaders of dark-money groups and an aide to
Mitch McConnell expressed frustration with the popularity of the
legislation—even among Republican voters.
By Jane Mayer - March 29, 2021
Audio: The presentation by Kyle McKenzie, the research director for the
Koch-run advocacy group Stand Together, on a January 8th call among
conservative opponents of House Resolution 1.
In public, Republicans have denounced Democrats’ ambitious
electoral-reform bill, the For the People Act, as an unpopular partisan
ploy. In a contentious Senate committee hearing last week, Senator Ted
Cruz, of Texas, slammed the proposal, which aims to expand voting rights
and curb the influence of money in politics, as “a brazen and shameless
power grab by Democrats.” But behind closed doors Republicans speak
differently about the legislation, which is also known as House
Resolution 1 and Senate Bill 1. They admit the lesser-known provisions
in the bill that limit secret campaign spending are overwhelmingly
popular across the political spectrum. In private, they concede their
own polling shows that no message they can devise effectively counters
the argument that billionaires should be prevented from buying elections.
A recording obtained by The New Yorker of a private conference call on
January 8th, between a policy adviser to Senator Mitch McConnell and the
leaders of several prominent conservative groups—including one run by
the Koch brothers’ network—reveals the participants’ worry that the
proposed election reforms garner wide support not just from liberals but
from conservative voters, too. The speakers on the call expressed alarm
at the broad popularity of the bill’s provision calling for more public
disclosure about secret political donors. The participants conceded that
the bill, which would stem the flow of dark money from such political
donors as the billionaire oil magnate Charles Koch, was so popular that
it wasn’t worth trying to mount a public-advocacy campaign to shift
opinion. Instead, a senior Koch operative said that opponents would be
better off ignoring the will of American voters and trying to kill the
bill in Congress...
- -
With so little public support, the bill’s opponents have already begun
pressuring individual senators. On March 20th, several major
conservative groups, including Heritage Action, Tea Party Patriots
Action, Freedom Works, and the local and national branches of the Family
Research Council, organized a rally in West Virginia to get Senator Joe
Manchin, the conservative Democrat, to come out against the legislation.
They also pushed Manchin to oppose any efforts by Democrats to abolish
the Senate’s filibuster rule, a tactical step that the Party would
probably need to take in order to pass the bill. “The filibuster is
really the only thing standing in the way of progressive far-left
policies like H.R. 1, which is Pelosi’s campaign to take over America’s
elections,” Noah Weinrich, the press secretary at Heritage Action,
declared during a West Virginia radio interview. On Thursday, Manchin
issued a statement warning Democrats that forcing the measure through
the Senate would “only exacerbate the distrust that millions of
Americans harbor against the U.S. government.”
Pressure tactics from dark-money groups may work on individual
lawmakers. The legislation faces an uphill fight in the Senate. But, as
the January 8th conference call shows, opponents of the legislation have
resorted to “under-the-dome-type strategies” because the broad public is
against them when it comes to billionaires buying elections.
Jane Mayer, The New Yorker’s chief Washington correspondent, is the
author of “Dark Money.”
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/inside-the-koch-backed-effort-to-block-the-largest-election-reform-bill-in-half-a-century
[information battleground]
*WE’VE GOT A REAL TRUE CRIME ON OUR HANDS.**
**APPLE HAS NO CLIMATE CATEGORY.**
**BUT THIS OPEN LETTER CHANGES EVERYTHING.*
THIS CAMPAIGN IS FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT BETTER ACCESS TO CLIMATE CONTENT,
PODCAST MAKERS AND PODCAST LISTENERS.
That means you either make, listen to, or support climate podcasts.
WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?
Apple doesn’t have a climate category, which makes it too damn hard for
listeners to find what they're looking for.
WHAT'S THE SOLUTION?
A climate category will mean easier access to critical information on
climate — all you need to do is sign.
SIGN THE OPEN LETTER https://www.podcastersdeclare.com/#letter
THE DEADLINE: APRIL 22, EARTH DAY.
https://www.podcastersdeclare.com/
- -
[too much to listen to]
https://www.podcastersdeclare.com/#deadline
[right now, climate change and global warming destabilization is the
most important story to cover -- very soon, it will be the only story]
[Digging back into the internet news archive]
*On this day in the history of global warming - April 19, 1990 *
The New York Times reports:
"President Bush, responding to criticism that the United States had
delayed taking concrete steps to address the threat of global
warming linked to pollution, said today, 'We have never considered
research a substitute for action.'
"Closing a two-day White House conference on the issue, Mr. Bush
said: 'To those who suggest we're only trying to balance economic
growth and environmental protection, I say they miss the point. We
are calling for an entirely new way of thinking, to achieve both
while compromising neither, by applying the power of the marketplace
in the service of the environment.'
"Mr. Bush also proposed a series of steps for integrating
international responses to the issue of global climate change. They
included an international 'charter' for cooperation in science and
economics related to global change, a statement of principles to
guide such research, the creation of international research
institutes and a communications network to monitor global changes."
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/04/19/us/bush-denies-putting-off-action-on-averting-global-climate-shift.html
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
*** Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20210419/007ec737/attachment.htm>
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list