[TheClimate.Vote] January 13, 2021 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Wed Jan 13 09:06:27 EST 2021
/*January 13, 2021*/
[strong words in the Guardian]
*Top scientists warn of 'ghastly future of mass extinction' and climate
disruption*
Sobering new report says world is failing to grasp the extent of threats
posed by biodiversity loss and the climate crisis
Phoebe Weston - 13 Jan 2021
The planet is facing a “ghastly future of mass extinction, declining
health and climate-disruption upheavals” that threaten human survival
because of ignorance and inaction, according to an international group
of scientists, who warn people still haven’t grasped the urgency of the
biodiversity and climate crises.
The 17 experts, including Prof Paul Ehrlich from Stanford University,
author of The Population Bomb, and scientists from Mexico, Australia and
the US, say the planet is in a much worse state than most people – even
scientists – understood.
“The scale of the threats to the biosphere and all its lifeforms –
including humanity – is in fact so great that it is difficult to grasp
for even well-informed experts,” they write in a report in Frontiers in
Conservation Science which references more than 150 studies detailing
the world’s major environmental challenges.
The delay between destruction of the natural world and the impacts of
these actions means people do not recognise how vast the problem is, the
paper argues. “[The] mainstream is having difficulty grasping the
magnitude of this loss, despite the steady erosion of the fabric of
human civilisation.”...
- -
The effects of the climate emergency are more evident than biodiversity
loss, but still, society is failing to cut emissions, the paper argues.
If people understood the magnitude of the crises, changes in politics
and policies could match the gravity of the threat.
“Our main point is that once you realise the scale and imminence of the
problem, it becomes clear that we need much more than individual actions
like using less plastic, eating less meat, or flying less. Our point is
that we need big systematic changes and fast,” Professor Daniel
Blumstein from the University of California Los Angeles, who helped
write the paper, told the Guardian.
The paper cites a number of key reports published in the past few years
including:
-- The World Economic Forum report in 2020, which named biodiversity
loss as one of the top threats to the global economy.
-- The 2019 IPBES Global Assessment report which said 70% of the
planet had been altered by humans.
-- The 2020 WWF Living Planet report, which warned the average
population size of vertebrates had declined by 68% in the past five
years.
-- A 2018 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report which
said that humanity had already exceeded global warming of 1C above
pre-industrial levels and is set to reach 1.5C warming between 2030
and 2052....
“We certainly should not be in any doubt about the huge scale of the
challenges we are facing and the changes we will need to make to deal
with them,” he said.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jan/13/top-scientists-warn-of-ghastly-future-of-mass-extinction-and-climate-disruption-aoe
[UN news speaks out]
*UN chief calls for ‘urgent transition’ from fossil fuels to renewable
energy *
- -
*Adaptation ‘ a moral imperative’ *
Against this backdrop, Mr. Guterres repeated his appeal to developed
nations to fulfill their annual pledge for $100 billion dollars to
support mitigation and adaptation in developing countries.
Pointing to vulnerabilities faced by Africa – from prolonged droughts in
the Sahel and Horn of Africa to devastating floods in the continent’s
south – he underscored “the vital importance of adaptation” as “a moral
imperative”.
The UN chief said that while only 20 per cent of climate finance is
earmarked for it, adaptation requires “equal attention and investment”.
“The forthcoming climate adaptation summit on 25 January is an
opportunity to generate momentum in this much neglected area”, he added.
*
**Reversing a dangerous trend *
Despite huge amounts of money that have been reserved for COVID-19
recovery and stimulus measures, the Secretary-General noted that
“sustainable investments are still not being prioritized”.
He outlined the need for an annual six per cent decrease in energy
production from fossil fuels through renewables, transition programmes,
economic diversification plans, green bonds and other instruments to
advance sustainability.
He reiterated the need to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5
degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, stating emissions needed to
fall by 7.6 per cent every year between now and 2030.
However, he noted that “some countries are still going in the opposite
direction. “We need to reverse this trend”, he said.
*Aligning with Paris *
He said all public and private financing should support the Paris
Agreement and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with training,
reskilling and providing new opportunities that are “just and inclusive”.
He noted that a sustainable economy means better infrastructure, a
resilient future and millions of new jobs – especially for women and
young people, maintaining that “we have the opportunity to transform our
world”.
“But to achieve this we need global solidarity, just as we need it for a
successful recovery from COVID-19”, the Secretary-General said,
reminding everyone that “in a global crisis we protect ourselves best
when we protect all”.
“We have the tools. Let us unlock them with political will”, concluded
the UN chief.
https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/01/1081802
**[deceit watch]
*Trump official publishes papers questioning seriousness of climate
change without White House approval*
Papers bearing the presidential seal appear on climate contrarian
websites but were not authorized
By Andrew Freedman and Jason Samenow
Jan. 12, 2021
Controversial papers questioning the seriousness of climate change led
by David Legates, a senior official at the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration appointed by President Trump, have been
published online without White House approval.
The papers, which were published on nongovernment websites, bear the
imprint of the Executive Office of the President and state they were
copyrighted by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
(OSTP). But they were disavowed.
“These papers were not created at the direction of The White House
Office of Science and Technology Policy nor were they cleared or
approved by OSTP leadership,” OSTP spokeswoman Kristina Baum said in an
email Monday night.
Reached by phone Tuesday, she added that “OSTP has no intention to
formalize these,” and said that they are being dealt with internally.
The papers make controversial and disputed claims about climate science,
including that human-caused global warming “involves a large measure of
faith” and that computer models are “too small and slow” to produce
meaningful climate simulations.
Legates did not reply to requests for comment regarding why the papers
were published bearing the seal of the Executive Office of the President
when they were not approved.
“These misguided and thoroughly erroneous screeds would not have been
issued by any body with a shred of scientific integrity,” wrote John
Holdren, who was the OSTP director under President Obama. “It is not
enough for an offense of this magnitude to be disavowed by an OSTP
spokesperson. It should be forcefully denounced by the OSTP Director,
Dr. Kelvin Droegemeier.”
Holdren also called for Legates to be fired.
Legates, a climate skeptic and climatology professor at the University
of Delaware, has been a mysterious figure at NOAA since he started in
September. Shortly after joining the agency he was detailed to a
position overseeing the U.S. Global Change Research Program, which
coordinates federal climate change research, while remaining a NOAA
employee.
Some at NOAA feared Legates, who has a long history of contributing to
the Heartland Institute and its efforts to cast doubt on mainstream
climate science findings, was working on a pet project, possibly one
that could be harmful to NOAA’s climate research programs.
The work Legates produced, called “The Climate Change Flyers,”
constitutes nine two- to 10-page essays that question the reliability of
computer models, the human-induced causes of climate change, and links
between climate change and hurricanes, among other topics...
- -
Andrew Rosenberg, a former NOAA official and director of the Union of
Concerned Scientists’ Center for Science and Democracy, described the
papers as an effort to “seed the record for the National Climate
assessment and future legal action by circumventing the peer review and
consensus process.”
“They want to get nonsensical debunked pseudoscience into the ‘official’
government record without subjecting it to independent evaluation,”
Rosenberg wrote in an email.
The controversial, unapproved papers were published to a website hosted
by the Center for Environmental Research and Earth Sciences, which calls
itself “a multi-disciplinary and independent research group,” but
provides no information as to any individual or organization that
supports it and asks its visitors to provide donations.
It appeals for contributions by declaring its independence “from
industry, government, religion, politics or ideology,” despite posting
the documents from Legates bearing the Executive Office of the
President’s seal.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2021/01/11/controversial-climate-skeptics-release-papers/
- -
[Warning - false information - deliberately deceitful]
*Can Computer Models Predict Climate?*
https://www.ceres-science.com/files/Flyers/Can%20Computer%20Models%20Predict%20Climate.pdf
*The Faith-Based Nature of Human Caused Global Warming*
https://www.ceres-science.com/files/Flyers/The%20Faith-Based%20Nature%20of%20Human-Caused%20Global%20Warming.pdf
- -
[some consequences]
*Trump officials reassigned by White House after publishing
controversial climate papers without approval*
Papers with the presidential seal appear on contrarian websites without
authorization, prompting the reassignment of David Legates and Ryan Maue
https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2021/01/11/controversial-climate-skeptics-release-papers/
[Digging back into the internet news archive]
*On this day in the history of global warming - January 13, 2004 *
"The Price of Loyalty," Ron Suskind's profile of former Treasury
Secretary Paul O'Neill, is released. The book recounts O'Neill's
numerous conflicts with the George W. Bush administration, noting that
O'Neill's efforts to have the administration act aggressively on carbon
pollution were met with scorn.
http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2004/02/09/Climate-CO2-policy-Bush-Cheney-style/UPI-96341076366045/
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
*** Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20210113/3bad865d/attachment.html>
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list