[✔️] May 30, 2021 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
richard at theclimate.vote
Sun May 30 11:26:40 EDT 2021
/*May 30, 2021*/
[USA Today - steps into the disinformation war]*
**'The future of this planet is at stake': Report pressures Facebook,
YouTube and Twitter to battle climate lies*
Jessica Guynn
USA TODAY - May 27, 2021
The nation’s leading social media companies pulled out the stops to shut
down conspiracy theories, hoaxes and falsehoods about COVID-19 and
vaccines, QAnon and the 2020 election, but they are far less aggressive
when it comes to the latest hot spot in the war on misinformation:
climate change.
Social media researchers and climate scientists said hundreds of
thousands of posts denying climate change can be found on Twitter,
Facebook and its Instagram app, Tik Tok and YouTube. A new report from
Advance Democracy shared exclusively with USA TODAY found that warning
labels or links to credible information are frequently missing from
posts that deny the existence of climate change, dispute its causes or
underplay its effects.
Among them is the false belief that the Grand Solar Minimum, a period of
low solar activity, will cool the planet and cause the next ice age,
which is particularly popular among prominent climate change deniers and
even has its own YouTube channel...
- -
Daniel Jones, president of Advance Democracy, said climate
misinformation that obfuscates or downplays the threat to human life
delays “necessary policy reforms worldwide.”
“Our research affirms that the spread of climate misinformation is
prolific on social media and could benefit from platform interventions
that steer users to more accurate information,” he said.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2021/05/27/facebook-youtube-twitter-climate-misinformation-lies/7458465002/
[Western heat and drought forecast - brief broadcast video]
*U.S. braces for extreme weather conditions coast-to-coast*
May 29, 2021
CBS Evening News
Americans nationwide are expected to face extreme weather conditions
this Memorial Day weekend, with the South bracing for storms and the
eastern U.S. experiencing unusually cold temperatures. CBS meteorologist
and climate specialist Jeff Berardelli has more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb-GxqVlgPE
[ 's not the proper term, pardon me]
*'Sea snot' is clogging up Turkey's coasts, suffocating marine life, and
devastating fisheries*
Morgan McFall-Johnsen May 28, 2021
- A goopy substance called sea snot has been clogging Turkish coasts
in the Sea of Marmara for months.
- The mucus has been filling fishing nets, suffocating coral, and
killing marine life.
- climate change and fertilizer runoff may be fueling the algae boom
that's behind the sea snot.
Blankets of a goopy, camel-colored substance have been accumulating in
the water off Turkey's coast for months.
The goop, called marine mucilage or "sea snot," is covering so much of
the coastline along the Sea of Marmara that people can no longer fish
there. The sea snot formations can get up to 100 feet (30 meters) deep,
according to the Turkish news site Cumhuriyet.
The sea snot fills fishing nets and weighs them down — one fisherman
told Cumhuriyet that nets have been bursting from the weight of the
mucus. A fishery co-op leader said people were barely pulling in a fifth
of the fish they hauled at this time last year.
Marine mucilage is a goopy discharge of protein, carbohydrates, and fat
from microscopic algae called phytoplankton. The substance was
documented in the Sea of Marmara for the first time in 2007, as
researchers at Istanbul University reported in 2008...
- -
Since phytoplankton thrive in warm water, scientists suspect that
climate change is fueling the new sea-snot crisis. Runoff from nitrogen-
and phosphorous-rich fertilizer and sewage could also be causing an
explosion in the phytoplankton population.
"We are experiencing the visible effects of climate change, and
adaptation requires an overhaul of our habitual practices. We must
initiate a full-scale effort to adapt," Mustafa Sarı, dean of Bandırma
Onyedi Eylül University's maritime faculty, told The Guardian.
"The gravity of the situation set in when I dived for measurements in
March and discovered severe mortality in corals," he told The Guardian.
Thousands of fish have been washing up dead in coastal towns as well,
Sarı told The Guardian. The fish could be suffocating because sea snot
clogs their gills, or because it depletes the water's oxygen levels.
"Once the mucilage covers the coasts, it limits the interaction between
water and the atmosphere," Sarı said.
https://www.businessinsider.com/turkey-sea-snot-crisis-devastates-fishing-marine-life-2021-5
[delicious changes]
*Outrage and delight as France ditches reliance on meat in climate bill*
Environment minister Barbara Pompili says proposals will help country to
meet net zero emissions
Meat will be off the menu at least one day a week in schools, while
vegetarian options will be standard in public catering, and chefs
will be trained in how to prepare healthy and toothsome plant-based
meals.
The proposals have sparked uproar and howls of outrage among the
traditionalists of French cuisine, but have been welcomed by many
young people...
- -
France’s economic stimulus package is one of the world’s greenest:
of the €100bn the government is spending to revive the economy after
the Covid-19 shock, at least €30bn will go on low-carbon projects.
The French are also working internationally, with the UK, to ensure
that vital UN climate talks, called Cop26, to be held later this
year in Glasgow, result in the full implementation of the 2015 Paris
agreement. “France has a special responsibility,” she said.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/may/29/france-outrage-delight-meat-ditch-reliance-climate
[Why anxiety?]
*Climate Anxiety Makes Good Sense*
But in solidarity there’s some solace.
By Bill McKibben - May 5, 2021
Even as we begin to emerge from the stress of the pandemic year,
mental-health professionals are noting a steady uptick in a different
form of anxiety—the worry over climate change and the future that it
will bring. The latest survey research from Yale and George Mason
universities shows about forty per cent of Americans feeling “disgusted”
or “helpless” about global warming; a poll from the American Psychiatric
Association last autumn found that fifty-five per cent of respondents
were concerned about the effects of climate change on their own mental
health. The effects seem particularly harsh on new mothers, and, indeed,
a fear of adding to the climate problem and of the disintegration it
might cause seems to be deterring large numbers of young people from
having kids of their own. Understandably, the fear of a wrecked future
increases as you descend the age scale: a March survey of Gen-Z
Americans aged between fourteen and twenty-four found that eighty-three
per cent are concerned about the health of the planet (although nearly
half said that they have been feeling a little better since Biden took
office).
Perhaps there are ways in which this fear is a luxury—Sarah Jaquette
Ray, who literally wrote the book on climate anxiety, noted recently
that it is an “overwhelmingly white” phenomenon. Not because people of
color care less about the climate crisis (in fact, they care more), but
because they’ve faced other existential crises. “The prospect of an
unlivable future has always shaped the emotional terrain for Black and
brown people, whether that terrain is racism or climate change,” Ray
wrote. “Exhaustion, anger, hope—the effects of oppression and resistance
are not unique to this climate moment. What is unique is that people who
had been insulated from oppression are now waking up to the prospect of
their own unlivable future.” Eric Holthaus, in his always interesting
Substack newsletter on climate, echoed some of these thoughts, after
describing his own anxiety as so crippling that, during attacks that
lasted weeks, he’d “been unable to write, unable to interact with
friends, unable to function normally.” But, he said, since those “who
have already been marginalized by centuries of oppression will be hurt
the worst . . . our job, as the climate anxious, is to repair that
oppression, repair that marginalization, to make sure you’re not
offloading your anxiety onto someone else in ways that are causing more
harm.”
That’s fair enough—action has always seemed the best salve to me. (And
for those for whom it is not enough, the Climate Psychology Alliance
North America has published a directory of “climate-informed
therapists.”) But I think there’s another reason that climate change can
be so uniquely anxiety-producing: we’re not used to dealing with fights
that we don’t know we can win. Martin Luther King, Jr.,’s statement,
quoting the abolitionist Theodore Parker, that “the arc of the moral
universe is long, but it bends toward justice” was comforting in a
civil-rights fight that required—and requires—enormous courage: they
meant, I think, “this may take a while but we’re going to win.” But a
different kind of courage is needed for the climate battle, because the
arc of the physical universe is short and it bends toward heat. If we
don’t win soon, we will never win, because the Earth is rushing toward
irrevocable tipping points. We’ve already passed some—there’s no plan
afoot to refreeze the Arctic. And clearly things will get much worse
before they (possibly) start to stabilize; we’ve raised the temperature
a degree Celsius already, and the most optimistic thinkers on the planet
reckon that we might just be able to top out at 1.5 degrees.
All of which is to say that we are right to be anxious. There are
profound reasons to hope that we’re about to make serious progress: the
sudden arrival of cheap renewable energy; the shifting zeitgeist. (As is
often the case, Rebecca Solnit sums them up with particular power.) Even
if we catch some breaks from physics, though, it’s going to be a tough
few decades. And what will make it toughest may be the (very American)
assumption that we have to endure the anxiety by ourselves, in our own
heads. I’ve found the simple solidarity of movements at least as useful
as the opportunities for action that they provide; just knowing that
lots of other people are at work on the same problem is a solace, and a
goad to keep working. It’s one reason that I’m glad that vaccinations
are proceeding apace. It’ll be strategically useful to be back in the
streets, but it will also be psychologically useful: we are shoulder to
shoulder on Zoom, but it’s not quite the same.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-a-warming-planet/climate-anxiety-makes-good-sense
[full disclosure - The curator or this newsletter is a board member of
Climate Psychology Alliance North America]- -
- -
[one psychology research paper]
*Fear Appeal Theory*
February 2012International Journal of Economics and Business Research
5(February):63-82
Authors: Kaylene C Williams California State University, Stanislaus
Abstract
A fear appeal posits the risks of using and not using a specific
product, service, or idea such that if you don't "buy," some
particular dire consequences will occur. That is, fear appeals rely
on a threat to an individual's well-being that motivates him or her
toward action, e.g., increasing control over a situation or
preventing an unwanted outcome. While threat and efficacy clearly
are important for fear appeal effectiveness, these two ingredients
alone are not sufficient. Additionally, empirical results regarding
fear appeal effectiveness are not conclusive. However, the
literature conventionally agrees that more effective fear appeals
result from a higher fear arousal followed by consequences and
recommendations to reduce the negativity. The purpose of this
article is to review and examine the fear appeal literature with the
aim of understanding the current overall fear appeal theory. In
particular, this paper includes the following sections:
introduction, definition of a fear appeal, use of fear appeals,
theories of fear appeals, overall findings from the fear appeal
theories and literature, and summary.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265807800_Fear_Appeal_Theory
[Digging back into the internet news archive]*
**On this day in the history of global warming May 30, 2013
*May 30, 2013: In a controversial Huffington Post article, climate
scientist James Hansen suggests that neither Republicans nor Democrats
can be relied upon to combat carbon pollution in a market-based manner.
Dr. James Hansen, Contributor Climatologist and Adjunct Professor,
Columbia University Earth Institute
The American Party -5/30/2013
My remarks when receiving the Ridenhour Courage Award were written
in Union Station on my way to the event. But my concluding comment —
that we are near a point when the American people should contemplate
a centrist third party — was not an idle spur-of-the-moment reflection.
I was in government 40 years, long enough to understand how aging
organizations can evolve into self-licking ice cream cones1,
organizations whose main purpose becomes self-perpetuation rather
than accomplishment of their supposed objectives. The public can see
this tendency in our politicians, our Congress, and our major
political parties.
Our government has failed to address climate, energy, and economic
challenges. These challenges, addressed together, actually can be a
great opportunity. Our democracy and economic system still have
great potential for innovation and rapid adoption of improved
technologies, if the government provides the right conditions and
gets out of the way.
The Solution is Not Rocket Science
Conservatives and liberals alike can recognize the merit of honest
pricing of fossil fuels. Fossil fuels today receive subsidies and do
not pay their costs to society. Human health costs of pollution from
fossil fuel burning and fossil fuel mining are borne by the public.
Climate disruption costs are borne by the victims and all taxpayers.
This market distortion makes our economy less efficient and less
competitive. Fixing this problem is not rocket science. The solution
can be simple and transparent.
- -
Citizens Climate Lobby
Implausible dreaming, you scoff. Not so fast. For example, consider
Citizens Climate Lobby. If you don’t know about them read today’s
article in the New York Times. These are honest, hard- working
people trying to educate politicians and the public about the need
for a revenue-neutral carbon fee via op-eds, letters-to-the-editor,
meetings with editorial boards, meetings with congressional
staffers, and meetings with congress people.
Citizens Climate Lobby is made up largely of volunteers, with
continual training of new recruits. They have doubled in size each
year for the past several years and are active in most states. They
are positive, dedicated and respectful, creating a good impression
with congress people.
What is the chance that they can compete against the well-heeled
fossil fuel lobby? Hard to say. But if they fail to move our present
government by 2015, and by then have doubled in size a few more
times, they just may be a democratic force to be reckoned with. They
seek to persuade and are unfailingly respectful and polite, but
determined. So, if in a few years the two major parties remain
uncompromising and unsupportive of a carbon fee, it would not
surprise me if Citizens Climate Lobby became a major force for a
centrist third party.
Everybody is welcome to join Citizens Climate Lobby — a link to an
introductory call is at http://www.tfaforms.com/275537.
- -
-- A self-licking ice cream cone is a self-perpetuating system with no
purpose other than to sustain itself. The phrase was used first in 1992
in On Self-Licking Ice Cream Cones, a paper by Pete Worden about NASA’s
bureaucracy.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-american-party_b_3358546 *
*https://citizensclimatelobby.org/
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
- Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for democratic
and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial purposes.
Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20210530/b7e1aaa4/attachment.htm>
More information about the TheClimate.Vote
mailing list