[✔️] September 22, 2021 - Daily Global Warming News Digest

[👀 Richard Pauli]

/*September 22, 2021*/

[Serious academic discussion on current disinformation - 90 minute video ]
https://youtu.be/0dsr-VSp65U?t=447
*Defending Against Disinformation*
Sept 21, 2021
UC Berkeley Events

Disinformation — the intentional dissemination of false information to 
shape political and social outcomes — is increasingly a feature of the 
U.S. political landscape. The effects are pernicious: By causing 
confusion, disinformation amplifies division and aggravates discord. By 
creating a false but widely held alternate reality, it can destabilize a 
society. Just in the past year, disinformation has had direct, harmful 
effects on efforts to check the spread of COVID-19, on initiatives for 
racial justice and on the 2020 election and its aftermath. Clearly, 
disinformation costs lives and erodes democracy.

On Wednesday Sept. 21 at 12 noon, a panel of eminent Berkeley scholars 
will explore one of the most critical questions facing U.S. democracy: 
How can we counter disinformation without compromising America’s core 
principles?

The panelists will be: Geeta Anand, dean of the School of Journalism; 
Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of Berkeley Law; Hany Farid, associate dean and 
head of the School of Information; Susan D. Hyde, chair of the 
Department of Political Science; john powell, director of the Othering & 
Belonging Institute; and moderator Henry Brady, former dean of the 
Goldman School of Public Policy.

The event is sponsored by the Goldman School of Public Policy, Berkeley 
Law, and the Office of Communications and Public Affairs, with support 
from the Social Science Matrix.
https://youtu.be/0dsr-VSp65U?t=447



/[weathers have changed]/
*An unpreparable storm*
With sustained winds of 150 mph when it came ashore, Hurricane Ida was 
the strongest landfalling hurricane in Louisiana history — tying last 
year’s Hurricane Laura. It’s the first time in history there’s been a US 
state that’s endured two hurricanes that strong in back-to-back years.

Ida brought unimaginable wind far inland, its 40-foot waves showed up on 
seismic equipment, and its storm surge was so strong that it temporarily 
reversed the flow of the Mississippi River. Going from non-existent to a 
near-Category-5 landfall in 72 hrs is something no hurricane had ever 
done before in the Atlantic.

The sounds this storm made were like hell: 
https://twitter.com/thegoprodad/status/1432049760496758791
In pandemic New Orleans, mandatory evacuations now require 72 hours 
notice. That means that Ida’s rapid intensification put Louisiana in 
uncharted territory. It was literally impossible for New Orleans to 
prepare for something like Ida.

As a meteorologist, that’s a chilling fact. We’re in a situation where 
hurricanes can now grow more powerful and more quickly than our cities 
can make themselves safe.

We knew this was going to happen. We know that climate change is making 
storms like this happen more often. Still, Ida was shocking — the sixth 
tropical storm or hurricane to hit Louisiana in little more than a year.

There was no way that Louisiana could be ‘resilient’ to something like 
this. This is trauma — an intentional, repeated wound that keeps being 
opened over and over again...
- -
“Resilience” has its limits. We’re there.
Climate change is a trauma that’s moving all of us physically and 
emotionally to places that make us feel unsafe. What happens when 
there’s nowhere else to go?

My overwhelming feelings of the past several months are shock, worry, 
sadness, desperation, and empathy. If you’re feeling this way too, it’s 
OK to call this trauma.

 From California to Haiti to Afghanistan to New Orleans, from fires to 
flood to injustice to revolution, it’s all so much. And I’m just an 
observer — safe in my home with my kids and my garden and our pet 
hamster. Nothing makes sense.

This summer, I’m realizing that this is just how it is now. For the rest 
of my life. For the rest of my kids’ lives.

I don't know what else there is to say. My heart is breaking for people 
I've never met, for injustice and more layers of trauma we knew were coming.
https://thephoenix.substack.com/p/lets-stop-talking-about-climate-resilience?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxNjgzNTA5LCJwb3N0X2lkIjozNzQxMzAzMCwiXyI6InI3Mk5tIiwiaWF0IjoxNjMyMjg0MDMwLCJleHAiOjE2MzIyODc2MzAsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0xMDIzOTkiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.k8zwejj10V-upEYhhJ092PJBw6jpq7KDzyfm-kpD5kM



/[following the flow of money]/
*Special Report: BP gambles big on fast transition from oil to renewables*
By Ron Bousso
- -
"BP is still looking to sell assets, at a time when demand for them is 
not great, and recycle that cash into renewable-energy assets, where 
competition for them is fierce," Mould said in an August note to 
investors. "That sounds like a potential recipe for selling low, buying 
high and destroying shareholder value along the way."...
- -
It will be years before investors know the outcome of Looney's wager on 
renewables. Still, even BP's relatively fast transformation doesn't go 
far enough in reducing climate damage, said Kim Fustier, an oil-and-gas 
analyst at HSBC bank. She expects BP's earnings from renewables and 
low-carbon businesses to represent 4% to 5% of total earnings by the 
middle of the decade and 10% to 15% by 2030.

"This is nowhere near enough for investors to start thinking of these 
companies as being part of the solution," Fustier said.
https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/bp-gambles-big-fast-transition-oil-renewables-2021-09-20/


/[CNBC calling out the controversy]/
*Bill Gates says partisan politics hurts climate change battle, and the 
U.S. is ‘one of the worst’*
Catherine Clifford -- SEP 21 2021
- - “Sadly, the U.S. is one of the worst in the issue being partisan in 
nature, but we need to change that,” Bill Gates said in an interview 
that aired Tuesday during Climate Week NYC.
- - The billionaire co-founder of Microsoft is also the founder of the 
climate innovation and investment company Breakthrough Energy and the 
founder and chairman of the advanced nuclear company TerraPower.
- - “This is hard enough to drive innovation and deployment and cost 
reduction in this 30-year deadline even if there is not a single day of 
pause in that,” Gates said.
Decarbonizing economies and infrastructures is a monumental task.

“I see momentum building, I see awareness building, but this will be the 
hardest thing humanity has ever done,” Gates said.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/21/bill-gates-partisan-politics-hurts-climate-change-fight-in-us.html


/[distressing opinion]/
*Democrats May Be on the Verge of Climate Disaster*
The party’s climate measures suddenly face a tough battle in Congress.
By Robinson Meyer
*I’m starting to become concerned about President Joe Biden’s ability to 
pass a climate bill. *They’re speaking sotto voce, but still: In the 
past few days, Democrats on the party’s left and right flanks have 
started to hint that, well, in some circumstances, given some 
contingencies, they might prefer no bill to a negotiated compromise with 
the rival flank.

The most worrying signs so far have come from Senator Joe Manchin, the 
West Virginia Democrat who has received more donations from the coal, 
gas, and oil industries in the current election cycle than any other 
senator. Manchin was never going to be an easy customer; in 2010, he 
shot a bullet through President Barack Obama’s cap-and-trade bill. Yet 
he seemed on board with the Clean Electricity Performance Program, the 
all-important (if fluidly named) Democratic proposal that would push 
utilities to generate more of their energy from zero-carbon sources 
every year. The CEPP would eliminate the greater part of 1 billion tons 
of climate pollution by itself and is essential to meeting the U.S. goal 
under the Paris Agreement.
Manchin has waffled on the plan through the year, but has never rejected 
it outright as he has a carbon tax. As West Virginia’s governor in 2009, 
he signed a relatively weak version of the policy into law. Now, 
however, he is writing an alternate version of the clean-electricity 
plan, The New York Times reported this week, that allots a larger role 
for natural gas and does not require utilities to decarbonize as quickly.

More worrying is the prospect that Manchin will not allow any change at 
all. He has privately said that Democrats should take a “strategic 
pause” and wait until 2022 to pass the reconciliation bill, Axios 
reported on Sunday. Such a proposal suggests that he is disquietingly 
comfortable with failing to pass anything at all. Democrats control the 
Senate by only a single vote, and 17 of their caucus’s members, 
including Manchin, are older than 70. Their House majority isn’t much 
bigger. Given that lawmakers have a counterproductive fear of doing much 
of anything ambitious in the same year that they face a midterm 
election, Manchin’s pause is akin to saying that no bill might be better 
than something.

The other wavering vote is that of Senator Kyrsten Sinema, who comes 
from the fossil-fuel-rich state of Arizona. She can be a wild card in 
negotiations but so far has seemed to focus more on Democrats’ 
health-care policy than their climate wrangling.
Also ominous, though, is that a small group of far-left environmental 
groups have started to strike the same note. They have demanded that any 
Clean Electricity Performance Program allow only solar, wind, and 
geothermal energy, leaving no role for other zero-carbon energy sources 
such as nuclear. They were joined, somewhat shockingly, by the otherwise 
mainstream progressive group Indivisible. Such a mandate is disconnected 
from reality: Insisting on a renewables-only grid would not just cost 
more than the entire reconciliation bill, but violate the pro-nuclear 
plank of the bipartisan infrastructure plan, which progressive lawmakers 
in the House agreed to last month. In other words, the decision to allow 
some nuclear power in this bill has already been made; the groups are 
telling someone not to eat a sandwich when the crumbs and empty wrapper 
are already on the ground. Even the Union for Concerned Scientists, 
which was founded in 1969 as an anti-nuclear watchdog, now says that 
existing nuclear plants must remain open if the United States hopes to 
reduce its carbon pollution fast enough to avoid catastrophe. Yet 
Indivisible and other groups have warned that no plan that deviates from 
renewables would be better than a flawed plan, according to Politico.

I feel for these groups, to be honest. They may be trying to even the 
stakes, which remain tilted in the centrists’ favor. As the Michigan 
State University political-science professor Matt Grossmann recently 
observed, Manchin and Sinema would prefer no deal to what progressives 
want, while progressives would prefer Manchin and Sinema’s version to no 
deal. But if this sort of brinkmanship renders legislation unpalatable, 
then lawmakers won’t swallow it. And the U.S. will go at least another 
decade without a climate law.

Democrats are haunted by 2009. That year, President Obama came to office 
promising to reform America’s health-care system and finally get serious 
about reversing climate change. He managed to do the first. His failure 
to accomplish the second has spawned a decade of appraisals.

The most authoritative of these was written by Theda Skocpol, a Harvard 
political scientist. In 2013, she argued that environmentalists had gone 
astray by focusing too much on elite bipartisan wrangling in Washington, 
D.C. Despite months of reaching out to Republicans and supplying 
conservative-friendly climate bills, climate groups failed to secure a 
single GOP vote in support of the 2009 bill. She also faulted the U.S. 
environmental movement for building membership organizations solely at 
the state or municipal level.

What was needed, she wrote, was a mass climate movement: “a 
climate-change politics that includes broad popular mobilization on the 
center left.” Only a broad movement could overcome the “right-wing elite 
and popular forces” that stood in the way of actually doing something.

 From this proposal, and others like it, a decade’s worth of climate 
groups were born. In September 2014, more than 300,000 people marched in 
New York City with the People’s Climate March. The Citizens’ Climate 
Lobby, a membership-based group that supports carbon pricing, gained 
steam, as did the left-wing activist group 350.org. In 2017 came the 
Sunrise Movement and, the next year, its demand for a Green New Deal. 
These groups all aimed to engineer the kind of mass mobilization around 
climate change that Skocpol had called for.
Today, the fate of another climate bill hangs in the balance, and I 
think it’s fair to ask: What role can these groups actually play? If you 
look at Sunrise’s power, specifically, it seems far more subtle than was 
once advertised. Back in June, Sunrise held a protest at the White 
House, demanding that Biden commit to creating a Civilian Climate Corps, 
a New Deal–inspired program that would employ young people to retrofit 
buildings and manage national wildland. The activists held signs with 
slogans like biden, you coward, fight for us. At the time, some 
commentators criticized Sunrise for not focusing on the true opponents 
of climate policy. “If you want to protest someone, protest the tiny 
handful of House Republicans who hold seats that Biden won and try to 
pressure them into backing the bill,” the center-left pundit Matthew 
Yglesias said. Others suggested that they protest Manchin.

Yet the nature of Sunrise’s power is more convoluted than that. Sunrise 
has little ability to coerce Manchin or Sinema, the most ardent critics 
of climate action in the Democratic caucus. Its power flows from its 
credibility with parts of the Democratic electorate: When Sunrise 
speaks, a cohort of educated, climate-terrified progressives listen. And 
if Sunrise says that a certain bill is inadequate to solving the climate 
crisis, or that Biden has sold the party out to fossil-fuel interests, 
those progressives will hear—and become so discouraged they’ll toss 
their hands up. And although Manchin might not need that cohort’s votes, 
other Democrats do.
Sunrise, in other words, holds a Damoclean sword above blue-state 
Democrats. The initial promise of Sunrise was that it would mobilize 
progressives to fight climate change. But its most potent power is the 
ability to demobilize, by instructing progressives that Democrats aren’t 
serious about climate change and aren’t worth their time, money, and 
effort. That isn’t a very enviable position for either Sunrise or the 
mainstream Democratic Party to be in. With any luck, nobody will need to 
discover what will happen if it changes—and the sword comes clattering 
to earth.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/09/democrats-may-be-verge-climate-disaster/620148/



/[Wars of Opinion Manipulation]/
*Facebook steps up fight against climate misinformation – but critics 
say effort falls short*
**New efforts will let vast amounts of false material slip through the 
cracks, according to climate advocates
SEPTEMBER 16, 2021
- -
“Climate change disinformation is spreading rapidly across Facebook’s 
social media platform, threatening the ability of citizens and 
policymakers to fight the climate crisis,” the groups wrote.

One recent study conducted by Friends of the Earth, an environmental 
organization, found about 99% of climate misinformation about the 
February 2021 power outages in Texas went unchecked.

The study found misleading reports that wind turbines were at fault in 
the outage had run rampant on the social media platform. It also showed 
how such theories make their way from the fringes of Facebook to the 
mainstream, finding that though the windmill claim was debunked on local 
and major news outlets, the falsehoods became talking points for 
prominent politicians within four days...
- -
The features announced on Thursday, Facebook said, would further reduce 
misinformation on the platform.

Khoo, of Friends of the Earth, argued Facebook could do far more. “For a 
company that makes $85bn a year, a $1m program that outsources the 
problem they’ve created shows that Facebook is not serious about solving 
climate disinformation,” he said.

Evan Greer, deputy director at the digital rights organization Fight for 
the Future, said that Facebook faced other critiques when it comes to 
combating climate misinformation, noting that the platform had been 
accused of suppressing posts and information from reliable organizations 
in the field.

In 2020 July, a prominent climate scientist said the platform was 
restricting her ability to research and factcheck posts containing 
climate misinformation. The company reportedly flagged the posts the 
scientist’s posts as “political”.

Facebook declined to comment further.
https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2021/09/facebook-climate-misinformation-lies-trump-propaganda-spreading-rapidly/

- -

/[one of the worst - what happened to Falun Gong?]/
*Climate denial newspaper flourishes on Facebook*
By Scott Waldman | 08/27/2021 05:32 AM EST
One of the most-viewed sites on Facebook in the last few months is a 
subscription page for a conservative media outlet that publishes climate 
denial.

The Epoch Times, a far-right newspaper that echoes anti-vaccine messages 
and promoted former President Trump’s false election claims, received 
44.2 million views between April and June for a page that offers to sign 
up subscribers, according to a report released by Facebook last week.

That was 10th overall.

It’s a remarkable achievement for a media outlet that has been banned 
from advertising on Facebook for hiding its connection to ads that 
supported Trump’s candidacy. It also raises questions about how an 
outlet that spreads climate misinformation was able to reach millions of 
people through a social media platform that has voiced commitments 
against spreading false assertions about science.

The Epoch Times, which was founded by members of the Chinese spiritual 
group Falun Gong, pivoted hard toward conservative politics during the 
Trump administration. And while the paper had a history of objective 
climate coverage before then, it has become one of the larger media 
sources of climate denial...
- -
Some of the commentary printed by the paper is from writers at think 
tanks that have received energy industry funding and that promote 
climate denial, such as the Heartland Institute and the Texas Public 
Policy Foundation.

Since its shift into hard-right politics, The Epoch Times has flourished 
financially, public tax records show. The Epoch Times Association 
reported $15.5 million in revenue in 2019, $12.5 million in 2018, $8.1 
million in 2017 and $3.9 million in 2016, public tax records show. The 
paper claims to publish in 22 languages in 36 countries.

The Facebook report suggests that the social media behemoth has helped 
fuel that rise.

The Epoch Times’ Facebook page has millions of followers and adds 
thousands of people every week. Its growth comes as the outlet has faced 
sanctions for deceptive pro-Trump ads.

The Facebook report is “essentially a PR effort” to tamp down criticism 
of the platform’s elevation of misinformation, said Jennifer Grygiel, an 
associate professor of communication at Syracuse University’s Newhouse 
School of Public Communications....
https://www.eenews.net/articles/climate-denial-newspaper-flourishes-on-facebook/



/[New word  has a touch of self-mockery - add it to your spell-check 
dictionary - //*Collapsology*//]/
*The term collapsology is a neologism* used to designate the 
transdisciplinary study of the risks of collapse of industrial 
civilization.[1] It is concerned with the "general collapse of societies 
induced by climate change, scarcity of resources, vast extinctions, and 
natural disasters."[2] Although the concept of civilizational or 
societal collapse had already existed for many years, collapsology 
focuses its attention on the contemporary, industrial and globalized 
society.
- -
Etymology
The word "collapsology" is a neologism invented "with a certain 
self-mockery" by Pablo Servigne, an agricultural engineer, and Raphaël 
Stevens, an expert in the resilience of socio-ecological systems. It 
appears in their book published in 2015

It is a portmanteau derived from the Latin collapsus, "to fall, to 
collapse" and from the suffix "-logy", logos, put for "study " , which 
is intended to name an approach of scientific nature.[8]

Since 2015 and the publication of How everything can collapse in French, 
several words have been proposed to describe the various approaches 
dealing with the issue of collapse: collapso-sophy to designate the 
philosophical approach, collapso-praxis to designate the ideology 
inspired by this study, and collapsonauts to designate people living 
with this idea in mind.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapsology


[Democracy Now - trusted news -- video]

*“We Need to Deliver”: Anger Grows at Sens. Manchin, Sinema over 
Obstruction of Democratic Priorities*
SEPTEMBER 21, 2021

Democrats are still divided over President Biden’s sweeping $3.5 
trillion spending plan to expand the social safety net, increase taxes 
on the rich and corporations, improve worker rights and combat the 
climate crisis. Senate Democrats are hoping to use the budget 
reconciliation process to pass the bill, but this will only work if the 
entire Democratic caucus backs the deal, and conservative Democrats have 
balked at the price tag. Progressive Democrats in the House, meanwhile, 
say they won’t vote for a separate $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill 
passed by the Senate unless the reconciliation bill is part of the 
package. “We want to pass the full agenda that President Biden has set 
forth,” says Ro Khanna, a Democratic congressmember from California. 
“This is what President Biden campaigned on, and we need to deliver.” 
Khanna also discusses U.S. immigration policy, raising the refugee cap, 
investigating the full 20 years of the War in Afghanistan and bringing 
U.S. troops home from Iraq.

    *REP. RO KHANNA:* You know, Amy, I have a decent relationship with
    Senator Manchin. I’ve never questioned his integrity. My point is,
    let’s get to the right policy. Let’s have a conversation. I mean, I
    understand that there are fossil fuel industry in his state. And so,
    if he has a view that we need to have more investment in his state
    in clean energy so that these jobs are first in West Virginia and he
    can go to his constituents and say, “This is not going to cost the
    economy in West Virginia; it’s actually going to add to it,” I’m
    open to having that conversation. Many progressives are open to
    having a conversation with him.

    We don’t know exactly where he and Senator Sinema are coming from.
    For example, on voting rights, his plan, it’s not one I fully agree
    with, but it’s a good one, and the progressives can rally around his
    voting rights plan. I guess my question to the senator, about
    Manchin and Sinema, is: What is their plan? Where is their — what
    are they proposing? That, as an initial matter, is necessary for us
    to get to a yes. And we made that clear to both the White House and
    those senators, that they have to come up with a proposal.

    *AMY GOODMAN: *He, Manchin, has said he has a concern about the
    money. Manchin has received more campaign donations from the oil,
    coal and gas industries than any other senator. Maybe that’s the
    money he’s concerned about?

    *REP. RO KHANNA:* Well, Amy, look, I’m having a hearing, as the
    environment chair, where we’re going to get the fossil fuel
    companies in for the first time — Exxon, Chevron, BP, Shell. So,
    we’re certainly going to realize and find out what they’ve been
    doing to kill legislation, to have lobbying influence.

    I will say this: I mean, West Virginia has a large fossil fuel
    industry. So, if there are individuals who are supporting him in
    those industries, that, to me, in and of itself, doesn’t — isn’t
    what is the decisive factor. What is the decisive factor is: What is
    he for? And if he comes onto the table and says, “Look, I want these
    things for West Virginia,” I think he’ll find a lot of people in the
    caucus are willing to do that. We want to have a dialogue with him.
    I personally have never questioned his integrity. What I want to do
    is: How do we get to a yes for the president’s agenda? And it’s in
    all of our interests as Democrats to do that.

https://www.democracynow.org/2021/9/21/35_trillion_spending_bill_ro_khanna



[High aspiration award goes to...]
*Walmart has a plan to tackle the climate crisis. Can it pull it off?*
Walmart is attempting to erase its huge climate footprint while 
continuing to sell tens of millions of low-priced products
- -
Walmart has declared its mission to tackle these climate impacts, which 
means focusing on every part of the chain – from the electricity sourced 
in its stores to the palm oil in the candy bars sold on its shelves. But 
while some experts celebrate the scale of the retailer’s efforts, others 
wonder whether they go far enough...
- -
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/sep/13/walmart-climate-change-plan-can-it-work


/[The news archive - looking back]/
*On this day in the history of global warming September 22, 2014*

        "John D. Rockefeller built a vast fortune on oil. Now his heirs are
            abandoning fossil fuels.

        "The family whose legendary wealth flowed from Standard Oil is
        planning to announce on Monday that its $860 million philanthropic
        organization, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, is joining the
        divestment
        movement that began a couple years ago on college campuses.

        "The announcement, timed to precede Tuesday’s opening of the United
        Nations climate change summit meeting in New York City, is part of a
        broader and accelerating initiative.

        "In recent years, 180 institutions — including philanthropies,
        religious organizations, pension funds and local governments —
        as well
        as hundreds of wealthy individual investors have pledged to sell
        assets tied to fossil fuel companies from their portfolios and to
        invest in cleaner alternatives. In all, the groups have pledged to
        divest assets worth more than $50 billion from portfolios, and the
        individuals more than $1 billion, according to Arabella Advisors, a
        firm that consults with philanthropists and investors to use their
        resources to achieve social goals."

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/22/us/heirs-to-an-oil-fortune-join-the-divestment-drive.html?smid=nytcore-iphone-share&smprod=nytcore-iphone

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/big-oils-heirs-join-call-for-action-as-climate-summit-opens/2014/09/21/ab27b1ce-40ea-11e4-b0ea-8141703bbf6f_story.html?tid=HP_more

http://www.msnbc.com/now/watch/sounding-the-alarm-on-climate-change-332140099937#

http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/the-rockefellers--huge-climate-announcement-332248643972

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/


/Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html> 
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote

/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
to news digest./

- Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only.  It does not carry 
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers.  A 
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and 
sender. This is a hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial 
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote 
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, 
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for 
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct 
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List 
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to 
this mailing list.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20210922/4843e8a1/attachment.htm>