[✔️] July 16, 2022 - Daily Global Warming News Digest
Richard Pauli
Richard at CredoandScreed.com
Sat Jul 16 10:05:40 EDT 2022
/*July 16, 2022*/
/[ PBS summarizes Joe Manchin - 6 min video ]/
*What Sen. Joe Manchin's rejection of new spending means for the climate
change fight*
Jul 15, 2022 President Biden is sharply ratcheting back his
expectations Friday for a major economic aid package. This comes as
Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin has ruled out backing key funding proposals
for his party's action on climate change. Lisa Desjardins joins William
Brangham for more on this blow to Biden's domestic agenda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heIZzpDA0mY
- -
/[ $tinker Joe ]/
*Joe Manchin Is the Ultimate Gaslighter*
The Democratic senator’s monthslong waffling foreshadows the future of
the fossil fuel playbook.
By Molly Taft
July 15, 2022
A lot of us have dated Joe Manchin.
I mean, yuck, not literally. But in watching this coal millionaire take
a torch to any sort of future hope for federal climate policy in the
U.S., it’s hard not to think of other gaslighters I’ve known.
In the early hours of Friday morning, the news broke that Manchin told
Democratic leaders Thursday that he would not support climate provisions
in President Biden’s Build Back Better Act. (He also nixed his support
for increased taxes on the wealthy, because he is leaning into being a
cartoon villain.)
This is the culmination of months of cat-and-mouse behavior from
Manchin, whose “maybe” vote has dragged out the passage of this package
thanks to his deciding presence in a split Senate. In increasing fits of
desperation, Democrats kept lowering their standards for Manchin’s
preferences, gutting and slashing climate provisions left and right
based on his whims—kind of like how you really want some guy to like
you, so accept him coming over at weird hours, or not introducing you to
his friends, or leaving you on read for days.
This dude is paid by fossil fuel interests that do not want to see
meaningful climate action. A coal waste resale company owned by Manchin
that feeds one (troubled) dirty plant has raked in $5 million in profits
for the senator and his wife since 2010. Powerful electric utilities,
several of which were opposed to certain renewable energy provisions in
the Build Back Better Act, are also Manchin’s buddies, and have paid him
handsomely for his service. In an exposé of Exxon’s lobbying practices
aired last summer, a lobbyist for the company referred to Manchin as a
“kingmaker” and said he spoke with his office every week; Exxon and
trade groups it’s a part of have been powerful forces lobbying against
Build Back Better. You can tell a lot about a guy by his friends, and if
they’re all assholes who live large on dirty money, chances are he’s the
same.
Leftist groups like the Sunrise Project have made their extreme
displeasure with Manchin—and with Democratic leadership for trusting
him—known throughout this entire process. But some centrist commenters
have encouraged the public to have faith in Manchin and other actors who
want “sensible” climate action. In a column from March, author and noted
big-brain boy Matt Yglesias argued that climate advocates critiquing
fossil fuel control of Washington were the ones stalling real progress,
explaining that Manchin is “not terrible on climate issues” because he
doesn’t deny the science—perhaps the lowest bar to ever be set in the
history of low bars.
Manchin himself has helped launder this image of being a moderate on
climate action partly through his own dawdling on Build Back Better
itself. He’s leaned hard on solutions favored by fossil fuel companies,
like carbon capture and storage, while seeming to make small concessions
on issues like methane—enough to keep Democratic leadership hooked on
the possibility of him coming around. It’s similar to when the guy
you’re dating claims he’s a feminist, even though he refers to his mom
as a bitch and all his exes as “crazy.”
There’s a lot of political crystal-ball gazing that I’m sure Washington
analysts will be parsing ad nauseam in the weeks to come. But
importantly, it seems clear to me that this behavior—pretending to be in
favor of climate “solutions” and “not denying the science” while
stalling actual progress for the benefit of your fossil fuel buddies—is
going to be easily replicated by politicians across the political
spectrum. Democratic leaders seem to expect anti-climate politicians to
be rejecting science left and right, when in reality fossil fuel
companies and their allies have made huge rhetorical shifts in how they
present themselves.
When even Exxon has a net-zero plan, it’s no longer the move to publicly
deny the science; rather, delay is the name of the game. The new fossil
fuel playbook is about questioning the efficacy of the very real, very
radical policies that we so desperately need right now, and presenting
false hope in the form of “solutions” like natural gas and carbon
capture that polluters are more comfortable with. Manchin’s techniques
may set the stage for a generation of savvy fossil-fuel-funded allies to
keep climate action at a standstill while earning brownie points for
seeming “concerned” about the issue. And based on how we saw Democratic
leadership cater to Manchin, they will be the first ones to be fooled,
time and time again.
Buckle up, everyone. It’s about to get a lot more gaslight-y out there.
https://gizmodo.com/joe-manchin-is-the-ultimate-gaslighter-1849182888
- -
/[ Perhaps a Senator from West Virginia needs a prognostication from The
National Weather Center - a US agency ]/
*Climate Prediction Center -- Climate News*
- - CPC Key Messages: Extreme heat to continue to impact the central
U.S., Drought conditions may rapidly worsen in some areas (14 Jul 2022)
- - La Niña conditions are favored to continue through the end of the
year (14 Jul 2022)
- - 47th Climate Diagnostics and Prediction Workshop Announcement (15
Apr 2022)
https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/
/[ CNN offers a fascinating science fiction idea - predicting the future
- as science reality today ]/
*A hypothetical weather forecast for 2050 is coming true next week*
Angela Fritz, CNN Senior Climate Editor
July 15, 2022
(CNN)Two years ago, forecasters in the UK conducted an interesting
thought experiment: What will our forecasts look like in 2050?
The climate crisis is pushing weather to the extreme all over the world,
and temperatures in the northern latitudes have been particularly
sensitive to these changes. So meteorologists at the UK Met Office --
the official weather forecast agency for the UK -- dove in to the super
long-range climate models in the summer of 2020 to see what kind of
temperatures they'd be forecasting in about three decades.
"Not actual weather forecast," the Met Office's graphics said. "Examples
of plausible weather based on climate projections."
Well, on Monday and Tuesday, the "plausible" becomes reality -- 28 years
early.
Simon Lee, an atmospheric scientist at Columbia University in New York,
noted the striking similarity between the 2050 outlook and the forecast
for early next week in the UK.
"Today, the forecast for Tuesday is shockingly almost identical for
large parts of the country," Simon tweeted, adding in a later post that
"what is coming on Tuesday gives an insight into the future."
In 30 years, this forecast will seem rather typical.
Temperatures are forecast to run 10 to 15 degrees warmer than normal
early next week in the UK. Highs could approach 40 degrees Celsius
(around 104 degrees Fahrenheit) for the first time -- a prediction that
prompted meteorologists there to issue a "red" heat warning for the
first time ever.
To be clear, this would be truly record-breaking heat. The country's
hottest temperature ever measured was 38.7 degrees Celsius at the
Cambridge Botanic Garden in 2019.
It's also clearly a sign of how rapidly the climate crisis is altering
our weather.
"We hoped we wouldn't get to this situation," the Met Office's climate
attribution scientist Nikos Christidis said in a statement. "Climate
change has already influenced the likelihood of temperature extremes in
the UK. The chances of seeing 40°C days in the UK could be as much as 10
times more likely in the current climate than under a natural climate
unaffected by human influence."
The chance of exceeding 40 degrees is "increasing rapidly," Christidis said.
This is about more than a few uncomfortable days. Extreme heat is among
the most deadly weather events -- we just don't tend to see it happening
in the moment, when heat stroke and death are attributed to underlying
conditions like heart illness or respiratory disease.
And recent reports would suggest no more than 5% of UK homes have air
conditioning to help keep residents cool.
We saw a shockingly similar situation play out in the United States just
last summer, when the Pacific Northwest was plagued with extreme heat
for days. Hundreds of people died in that heatwave. Officials in British
Columbia noted that more than 800 "excess deaths" occurred during the
heat -- deaths that were unexpected and far from the norm for that time
of year.
Unlike flooding or wildfires destroying a town, the sense of urgency
around a deadly heat wave is not so dramatic, said Kristie Ebi, a
climate and health researcher at the University of Washington,
underscoring that heat is a "silent killer."
"When it's hot outside, it's just plain hot outside — and so it's a
relatively silent killer," Ebi previously told CNN. "People are
generally unaware and don't think about the risks associated with these
high temperatures."
She also said that it's important to understand that the climate is not
like what it was even just a few years ago. The climate crisis is
already affecting our lives today, and it will continue to hit the most
vulnerable.
"We all look forward to the summer as we enjoy the warmer temperatures,
but there are people who are at risk at higher temperatures," she said.
"As the climate continues to change or higher temperatures get higher
than what we experienced when we were younger, people need to pay more
attention, particularly to those around you."
CNN's Rachel Ramirez contributed reporting to this analysis.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/07/15/weather/2050-uk-forecast-comes-true-in-2022/index.html
/[speaking of reality ]/
*On climate, Democrats and Republicans don’t inhabit the same reality*
In the US, partisans even disagree about whether we've had extreme weather.
JOHN TIMMER - 7/15/2022,
https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/07/us-support-for-environmental-policies-fading-as-political-gap-remains-huge/
- -
/[ Pew studies ] /
*Biden Is Losing His Base on Climate Change, a New Pew Poll Finds. Six
in 10 Democrats Don’t Feel He’s Doing Enough*
Despite a sharp partisan divide on climate, support for renewable energy
and a carbon tax on corporations cuts across both Democrats and Republicans.
By Marianne Lavelle
July 14, 2022
Democrats who favor strong action on climate change are deeply
dissatisfied with what they see as the slow pace of progress under
President Joe Biden, according to a Pew Research Center report released
Thursday.
The survey of more than 10,000 adults conducted in early May showed a
deep partisan divide over Biden’s climate policies—much in line with the
split between Democrats and Republicans that has shown up in public
opinion polling for more than a decade. But a trend that is potentially
ominous for the White House emerged in the views of the Democratic base.
Among Democrats who back the overall direction of Biden’s climate
policies, 61 percent said the administration could be doing a lot more.
Democrats don’t seem sympathetic to arguments that Biden’s hands are
tied, for example, by an uncooperative Congress or the conservative
courts; only 37 percent of Democrats who favor strong action to counter
climate change said they think the administration is doing about as much
as can be expected.
“You get the sense from the data that there is frustration or
disappointment that more has not been done,” said Cary Funk, director of
science and society research for Pew. ..
- -
While younger and older Democrats alike see the need for climate action,
there is also a generation gap among Republicans, according to Pew.
Among Republicans aged 18 to 29, 47 percent say the federal government
is doing too little to reduce the effects of climate change, compared
with just 18 percent of Republicans 65 and older. ..
- -
Indeed, the Pew survey showed that 71 percent of Americans say their
local communities have experienced at least one of five forms of
“extreme weather” in the past year, although Pew didn’t use that term in
its question, since it could be viewed by some as politically charged,
said Funk. More than 40 percent said they had experienced floods,
intense storms or long periods of unusually hot weather, while 31
percent experienced droughts or water shortages and 21 percent endured
major wildfires. Rising sea levels that erode shorelines were reported
by 16 percent of those polled by Pew.
- -
The new Pew survey indicates that sentiment is prevalent in the
Democratic base, a sign Biden can only view as worrisome ahead of an
election where the party risks losing Congress. That, in turn, would
make climate action all the more difficult, given the partisan divide
the research shows.
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/14072022/biden-pew-poll-democrats-republicans/
- -
/[ Pew Research Center -- clips from their report ]/
JULY 14, 2022
*Americans Divided Over Direction of Biden’s Climate Change Policies*
Several climate policies receive bipartisan support, despite Republicans
and Democrats differing on overall approach
More than a year into Joe Biden’s presidency, the public is divided over
the administration’s approach to climate change: 49% of U.S. adults say
the Biden administration’s policies on climate change are taking the
country in the right direction, while 47% say these climate policies are
taking the country in the wrong direction...
- -
https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/07/14/americans-divided-over-direction-of-bidens-climate-change-policies/ps_2022-07-14_climate-change-policies_00-01/
Ratings of Biden’s approach to climate change – and the federal
government’s role dealing with the issue – are deeply partisan. A
majority of Republicans and independents who lean to the GOP (82%) say
Biden’s climate policies are taking the country in the wrong direction.
Among Democrats and Democratic leaners, most say Biden is moving the
country in the right direction on climate policy (79%).
But in a sign of Democratic frustration with progress tackling climate
change, there’s discontent within the party even among those who say
Biden’s policies are taking the country in the right direction. Among
Democrats who back the direction of the administration’s climate
policies, 61% say the administration could be doing a lot more on
climate; far fewer (37%) say they are doing about as much as can be
expected.
While the public is divided over Biden’s approach to climate change, a
majority of Americans continue to see room for more federal action on
the issue: 58% say the federal government is doing too little to reduce
the effects of global climate change, compared with just 18% who say it
is doing too much (22% say it is doing about the right amount). Here
again, partisan differences are wide, with Democrats much more likely
than Republicans to say the federal government is doing too little to
reduce the effects of climate change (82% vs. 28%).
Despite these polarized attitudes, the Pew Research Center survey of
10,282 U.S. adults conducted from May 2 to 8, 2022, finds broad public
agreement on some specific policies to address climate change. A large
majority of Americans (90%) say they favor planting about a trillion
trees to absorb carbon emissions to help reduce the effects of climate
change, and 79% favor providing a tax credit to encourage businesses to
develop technology to capture and store carbon emissions. Both of these
policies are backed by sizable majorities of Republicans and Democrats
alike...
- -
Climate change is making extreme weather events more frequent and
severe. A majority of Americans (71%) say their community has
experienced at least one of five forms of extreme weather in the past
year, including severe weather such as floods or intense storms (43%),
long periods of unusually hot weather (42%), droughts or water shortages
(31%), major wildfires (21%), or rising sea levels that erode shorelines
(16%).
Large shares of Americans who say their communities have been impacted
see climate change as contributing to these extreme weather events. For
example, among the 42% of Americans who say they have experienced
unusually hot weather in the last year, 61% say climate change
contributed a lot and 30% think it contributed a little. Across all five
forms of extreme weather included in the survey, more than eight-in-ten
of those who say they’ve been impacted view climate change as having
contributed a lot or a little to the event...
- -
Other key findings include:
*A 55% majority opposes phasing out the production of new gasoline cars
and trucks by 2035, while 43% are in favor.* Opposition is slightly
higher today than it was in April 2021, when 51% opposed and 47% favored
this idea. Partisans remain far apart on this proposal: 82% of
Republicans and those who lean to the GOP say they oppose phasing out
the production of new gas-powered vehicles by 2035, while 65% of
Democrats and Democratic leaners say they favor this.
*42% of U.S. adults say they are very or somewhat likely to seriously
consider purchasing an electric vehicle (EV). *About as many (45%) say
they are not too or not at all interested in an EV. Interest in
purchasing an EV is about the same as it was in the spring of 2021,
before gas prices in the U.S. rose sharply from an average of $2.95 in
April 2021 to $4.55 in May 2022. Roughly seven-in-ten of those at least
somewhat likely to consider an EV in the future cite saving money on gas
as well as helping the environment as reasons why.
*By 53% to 45%, Americans are more likely to view stricter environmental
laws as worth the cost than to say they cost too many jobs and hurt the
economy.* However, this view is less widely held today than it was in
September of 2019, when about two-thirds (65%) said stricter
environmental laws and regulations were worth the cost. Partisan
divisions on this measure have widened over the last few years.
Three-quarters of Republicans now say stricter environmental laws hurt
the economy, up 20 percentage points from 2019. Among Democrats, 21% now
say stricter environmental laws and regulations hurt the economy, up
from 14% in 2019.
*Younger Democrats are more likely than older Democrats to express
frustration with the administration on climate change.* Among Democrats
ages 18 to 29, 26% say the Biden administration’s climate policies are
taking the country in the wrong direction, compared with just 9% of
Democrats 65 and older. And among Democrats who say the Biden
administration is taking things in the right direction, those ages 18 to
29 are also more likely than those 65 and older to say the Biden
administration could be doing a lot more on climate change (73% vs. 54%).
*Lower-income adults as well as Black and Hispanic adults are especially
likely to report environmental problems in their communities.* A
majority of Americans see at least one of the environmental issues
mentioned in the survey, such as water pollution and excessive waste and
landfills, as a problem in their area. Lower-income adults and Black and
Hispanic adults are more likely to see these problems in their
communities than others in the U.S. For instance, 61% of lower-income
adults say air pollution is a big or moderate problem in their local
community, compared with smaller shares of middle- (45%) and
higher-income adults (38%).
*Within the GOP, younger adults are more likely than older adults to see
a need for federal government action or offer policy support on
environmental and climate issues. *About two-thirds (64%) of Republicans
ages 18 to 29 favor requiring power companies to use more energy from
renewable sources; Republicans 65 and older are much less likely to
support this policy (42%). This general pattern of greater support among
younger Republicans is seen across many – but not all – climate and
environmental policy questions.
*Large majorities of Americans remain broadly supportive of several
policies to address climate change*
While Americans have mixed reactions to the Biden administration’s
overall approach to climate policies, there continues to be broad public
support for a range of specific proposals aimed at reducing the effects
of climate change.
Chart shows two-thirds of Americans support incentives for more use of
hybrid and electric vehicles
An overwhelming majority of U.S. adults (90%) support planting about a
trillion trees to absorb carbon emissions. Majorities of Americans also
support tax credits to businesses for developing carbon capture and
storage technologies (79%) and requiring power companies to use more
renewable energy (72%). About two-thirds favor taxing corporations based
on their carbon emissions (68%) and incentives to increase the use of
hybrid and electric vehicles (67%).
- -
*Majorities of Americans say the federal government is doing too little
to protect water and air quality, address climate change*
On balance, Americans think the federal government is doing too little
to address several key areas of environmental protection, such as air
and water quality, and to reduce the effects of climate change...
- -
*Republicans and Democrats disagree over how much the federal government
is doing to protect key aspects of the environment*
Democrats remain much more likely than Republicans to say the federal
government is doing too little across key aspects of the environment.
Chart shows large majority of Democrats say the federal government isn’t
doing enough on climate change
On climate change, about eight-in-ten Democrats (82%) say the federal
government is doing too little, while just 13% say it is doing the right
amount and few (4%) say it is doing too much. By contrast, larger shares
of Republicans say the federal government is doing too much to address
climate change than say it is doing too little (37% to 28%); 33% say it
is doing about the right amount...
*- -*
*On balance, Americans think stricter environmental laws are worth the
cost – but a growing share see too much economic downside*
When asked for their overall views, slightly more Americans say stricter
environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost (53%) than say
they cost too many jobs and hurt the economy (45%).
Chart shows by narrow margin, Americans more likely than not to say
stricter environmental laws are worth the cost
The share of Americans who say stricter environmental laws and
regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy is up 12 percentage
points since 2019, when 33% expressed this view.
Rising concern about the economic impact of environmental laws has
primarily grown among Republicans (though this view has also grown
somewhat among Democrats)...
- -
*About seven-in-ten Americans say their local community has experienced
extreme weather in past year*
Most Americans report that their local community has experienced some
form of extreme weather in the past year. The most common experiences
are severe weather, like floods or intense storms (43% say their
community has experienced this in the past year) and long periods of
unusually hot weather (42%). Smaller shares say that in the past 12
months their local community has experienced droughts or water shortages
(31%), major wildfires (21%) or rising sea levels that erode beaches and
shorelines (16%). In all, 71% of Americans say they experienced at least
one of these five kinds of weather events in the past year
- -
*Most Americans who say their local community has experienced extreme
weather in the last year believe climate change was a contributing factor*
Chart shows among those whose local communities have experienced extreme
weather, most say climate change contributed a lot or a little
Among the 42% of Americans who say their local community has experienced
long periods of unusually hot weather, 61% say climate change
contributed a lot to this event, while another 30% say climate change
contributed a little. Just 8% do not see climate change as having played
a role.
Similarly, among those who say their local community experienced major
wildfires, 58% think climate change contributed a lot and 28% say
climate change contributed a little.
In fact, large shares of those who report experiencing any of these five
forms of extreme weather in the past year – including droughts, floods
or intense storms, and rising sea levels – believe climate change
contributed either a lot or a little.
- -
Black and Hispanic Americans continue to be more likely than White
Americans to report each of these environmental problems in their
communities. For example, 63% of Black Americans and 57% of Hispanic
Americans say safety of drinking water is at least a moderate problem in
their local community, compared with only 33% of non-Hispanic White
Americans. There are significant gaps by race and ethnicity when it
comes to other environmental problems, including air pollution.
Studies on environmental pollution have found that Black and Hispanic
Americans are exposed to air pollution from a wide variety of sources,
including construction and industry, more than White Americans.
Firsthand experiences with environmental problems also differ across
levels of family income. Those with lower incomes are more likely to
report environmental issues in their communities than those in middle-
and upper-income families. For instance, a majority of lower-income
Americans (58%) say the safety of drinking water is at least a moderate
problem in their local community, compared with 37% of those in
middle-income and 25% of those in upper-income families. Lower-income
communities are among those at the greatest risk for unsafe drinking water.
- -
*55% of U.S. adults oppose phasing out gasoline cars by 2035*
Americans lean against the idea of phasing out gas-powered vehicles by
2035: 55% say they oppose phasing out the production of new gasoline
cars and trucks by 2035, compared with 43% who support this proposal...
- -
*About four-in-ten Americans would seriously consider an electric car
for their next purchase*
When asked how likely they would be to seriously consider purchasing an
electric vehicle (EV), 42% of Americans say they would be very or
somewhat likely to seriously consider purchasing an electric vehicle. A
slightly larger share (45%) say they would be not too or not at all
likely to do this (13% say they do not plan to purchase a vehicle in the
future)...
- -
Democrats are more inclined than Republicans to say they are at least
somewhat likely to consider purchasing an EV. Younger adults within each
party are more inclined than older adults to say they this.
Those living in urban areas (53%) are more likely than those in suburban
areas (44%) to report interest in purchasing an electric vehicle. Those
living in rural areas are among the least likely to say this (27%)...
- -
However, Republicans and Democrats agree that saving money on gas is a
major reason to buy an electric car. Among those who would seriously
consider purchasing an electric car, 73% of Republicans and 70% of
Democrats say saving money on gas is a major reason why.
https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/07/14/americans-divided-over-direction-of-bidens-climate-change-policies/
/[The news archive - looking back]/
/*July 16, 1992*/
July 16, 1992: At the 1992 Democratic National Convention, Senator and
Vice-Presidential nominee Al Gore notes:
“I've spent much of my career working to protect the environment,
not only because it is vital to the future of my State of Tennessee,
our country and our earth, but because I believe there is a
fundamental link between our current relationship to the earth and
the attitudes that stand in the way of human progress. For
generations we have believed that we could abuse the earth because
we were somehow not really connected to it, but now we must face the
truth. The task of saving the earth's environment must and will
become the central organizing principle of the post-Cold War world.
“And just as the false assumption that we are not connected to the
earth has led to the ecological crisis, so the equally false
assumption that we are not connected to each other has led to our
social crisis.”
He also declares that President George H. W. Bush and Vice President Dan
Quayle “embarrassed our nation when the whole world was asking for
American leadership in confronting the environmental crisis. It is time
for them to go.”
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/27161-1
http://www.speeches-usa.com/Transcripts/al_gore-1992dnc.htm
=======================================
*Mass media is lacking, here are a few daily summariesof global warming
news - email delivered*
=========================================================
**Inside Climate News*
Newsletters
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or
once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines
deliver the full story, for free.
https://insideclimatenews.org/
---------------------------------------
**Climate Nexus* https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News summarizes the
most important climate and energy news of the day, delivering an
unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting. It also provides
original reporting and commentary on climate denial and pro-polluter
activity that would otherwise remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday
=================================
*Carbon Brief Daily https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up*
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon Brief
sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to thousands of
subscribers around the world. The email is a digest of the past 24 hours
of media coverage related to climate change and energy, as well as our
pick of the key studies published in the peer-reviewed journals.
more at https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief
==================================
*T*he Daily Climate *Subscribe https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate impacts,
solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better than coffee.
Other newsletters at https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
<https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html>
/
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender. This is a hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
More information about the theClimate.Vote
mailing list