[✔️] September 15, 2022 - Global Warming News Digest

Richard Pauli Richard at CredoandScreed.com
Thu Sep 15 08:48:07 EDT 2022


/*September 15, 2022*/

/[ a sea change in Congress ]/
*U.S. House Democrats probe PR firms' work for oil, gas companies*
By Valerie Volcovici - September 14, 2022
The report, which was based on its review of documents like submissions 
for industry awards, said PR firms helped oil companies fend off climate 
policies and mislead the public about their green claims by "engineering 
astroturf 'citizen' groups to advocate for industry interests and defeat 
legislative proposals, and using unscrupulous tactics to sabotage 
genuine policy solutions and attack community advocates."
PR firms declined to attend the hearing about whether they helped the 
fossil fuel industry spread disinformation about climate change, 
according to the House of Representatives panel holding the event.

"Of note, PR firms Singer Associates, Story Partners, and Pac/West 
Communications were invited but refused to attend," Committee 
spokesperson Lindsay Gressard said on Tuesday.

Gressard said FTI Consulting (FCN.N), another PR firm the committee is 
investigating, will not testify because it is working with the committee 
to turn in documents that the panel requested earlier this summer..
- -
While public scrutiny around energy companies' "greenwashing" claims has 
grown, the marketing agencies behind the campaigns have largely escaped 
scrutiny.
- -
"Fossil fuel marketers have shifted from denying or minimizing the 
science behind climate change to falsely suggesting that oil and gas are 
a central part of the climate-solutions mix," she said in her testimony, 
adding that 60% of energy company ads touted a green claim.

The House Oversight committee's Democrats came to a similar conclusion 
in their own year-long investigation into whether oil companies have 
misled the public on climate change.

https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/oil-industrys-ad-firms-shun-us-hearing-climate-disinformation-2022-09-14/

- -

/[ from the Drilled podcast  ]/
*Yes, The New York Times Really IS Shilling for Big Oil*
By Amy Westervelt – 14 Sep 2022 –
I wish Reps Raskin and Porter had not scheduled hearings at the same 
time today, but the fact that they're both happening are pretty great. 
Raskin is looking into the corporate push to limit individual free 
speech, via both SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) 
suits and anti-protest "critical infrastructure" (more on that one next 
week) and Porter is presiding over a hearing close to my heart: “The 
Role of Public Relations Firms in Preventing Action on Climate Change."

If you haven't yet, go listen to our season on this topic. Some of my 
favorite sources on this subject contributed new research to the 
Committee on Natural Resources's investigation, and the resulting report 
is incredible, laying out the work that firms like Group SJR, Universal 
McCann, T Brand Studio, Sam Singer Associates and more have done to 
manipulate the public conversation on climate, greenwash for oil 
companies and, in Singer's case, exploit news deserts to the industry's 
benefit (Singer oversaw the creation of the Richmond Standard in 
Richmond, Ca years ago and, more recently, the Permian Proud in Texas's 
Permian Basin.

In an award submission Singer Associates submitted for the Richmond 
Standard, the firm wrote that: "The website has achieved regional 
dominance, with a readership surpassing 'the circulation of the two 
major daily newspapers in the area, the San Francisco Chronicle and the 
Contra Costa Times.'"

It's hard to believe that claim and I wouldn't put it past Singer and co 
to just make it up, but the point is: that's the goal. For the company 
paper to beat out the real papers. As more oil and gas towns, regions, 
and states lose their papers is this what we can expect? Company papers 
for company towns?

The case study of SPR Group's work to help Exxon appeal to GenZ is also 
eye-opening. Mimicking BuzzFeed's video style, SPR claims to have gotten 
more young people to watch the whole video than other videos on various 
social media platforms. "The videos sought to show 'how natural gas is a 
lower emission' fossil fuel with an essential role in 'building 
America’s cleaner power grids,'" the report notes. A message that of 
course directly contradicts the truth: A recent EPA analysis of the U.S. 
oil and gas supply chain shows that methane released from natural gas 
extraction exceeded EPA estimates by around 60%, nearly doubling the 
climate impact of natural gas and causing warming on par with coal plants.
Universal McCann's partnership with the New York Times T Brand Studio 
for Exxon also features in the report, which notes that the campaign, 
which launched across all NYT platforms simultaneously, was intended to 
“drive awareness of ExxonMobil’s commitment to the research and 
development of lower-emissions energy through next-gen biofuels,” 
“develop positive brand perception of ExxonMobil through their efforts 
as a forward thinking and responsible company,” and “increase 
favorability of primary audiences.” In an award submission Universal 
McCann explained that had worked with the NYT's internal brand studio 
"to create content in a 'Timesian voice' that would feel 'native to the 
publication,' and which 'mirrored the award-winning journalism of the 
world-renowned publication [to ensure] authenticity, credibility and 
relevance, and [be] ultimately more impactful to the audience.'"  UM 
also noted that the campaign's content included “a first-ever 
consecutive ‘Science Times’ print takeover, an interactive long-form 
journalistic-style article, CGI print spreads, audio spots in top-rated 
‘The Daily’ podcast, online ads, social posts, and homepage videos.

Every time I've written about the T Brand studio's work for oil 
companies, I've had people say "but there's a separation between ad and 
edit!" and I reply, "sure, but readers don't know that, and that is the 
entire reason oil companies hire the T Brand studio." Now here it is in 
Universal McCann's own language, they were looking for "a Timesian voice 
that would feel native to the publication and which mirrored the 
award-winning journalism of the world-renowned publication."

The Times has some of the best climate reporters out there and this is a 
slap in the face to all of them.

The Committee is also investigating another layer of PR firms. Not the 
ones that show up to industry conferences and apply for awards, but the 
shadowy underlayer willing to do the stuff the more buttoned-up firms 
won't. Firms like  FTI Consulting, Story Partners, and HBW Resources. 
The investigation is ongoing and I suspect there are more hearings to 
come. Unlike oil companies, which can afford to only want policy to go 
one way, at least some of these PR firms will lose clients and 
credibility over this. A few might even want to save their own 
reputations by coming clean about what this industry has asked them to do...

You can watch the hearing at 10am ET on the House Natural Resource 
Committee's YouTube channel.
Universal McCann's partnership with the New York Times T Brand Studio 
for Exxon also features in the report, which notes that the campaign, 
which launched across all NYT platforms simultaneously, was intended to 
“drive awareness of ExxonMobil’s commitment to the research and 
development of lower-emissions energy through next-gen biofuels,” 
“develop positive brand perception of ExxonMobil through their efforts 
as a forward thinking and responsible company,” and “increase 
favorability of primary audiences.” In an award submission Universal 
McCann explained that had worked with the NYT's internal brand studio 
"to create content in a 'Timesian voice' that would feel 'native to the 
publication,' and which 'mirrored the award-winning journalism of the 
world-renowned publication [to ensure] authenticity, credibility and 
relevance, and [be] ultimately more impactful to the audience.'"  UM 
also noted that the campaign's content included “a first-ever 
consecutive ‘Science Times’ print takeover, an interactive long-form 
journalistic-style article, CGI print spreads, audio spots in top-rated 
‘The Daily’ podcast, online ads, social posts, and homepage videos.

Every time I've written about the T Brand studio's work for oil 
companies, I've had people say "but there's a separation between ad and 
edit!" and I reply, "sure, but readers don't know that, and that is the 
entire reason oil companies hire the T Brand studio." Now here it is in 
Universal McCann's own language, they were looking for "a Timesian voice 
that would feel native to the publication and which mirrored the 
award-winning journalism of the world-renowned publication."

The Times has some of the best climate reporters out there and this is a 
slap in the face to all of them.

The Committee is also investigating another layer of PR firms. Not the 
ones that show up to industry conferences and apply for awards, but the 
shadowy underlayer willing to do the stuff the more buttoned-up firms 
won't. Firms like  FTI Consulting, Story Partners, and HBW Resources. 
The investigation is ongoing and I suspect there are more hearings to 
come. Unlike oil companies, which can afford to only want policy to go 
one way, at least some of these PR firms will lose clients and 
credibility over this. A few might even want to save their own 
reputations by coming clean about what this industry has asked them to do...

You can watch the hearing ... on the House Natural Resource Committee's 
YouTube channel.
https://www.drilledpodcast.com/finally-congress-looks-at-the-role-of-pr-firms-in-climate-obstruction/



/[ UNHCR is the UN Refugee Agency - concerned with Environment, 
Disasters and Climate Change ]/
*The climate crisis is a human crisis. It is driving displacement and 
makes life harder for those already forced to flee.*
The impacts of climate change are numerous and may both trigger 
displacement and worsen living conditions or hamper return for those who 
have already been displaced. Limited natural resources, such as drinking 
water, are becoming even scarcer in many parts of the world that host 
refugees. Crops and livestock struggle to survive where conditions 
become too hot and dry, or too cold and wet, threatening livelihoods. In 
such conditions, climate change can act as a threat multiplier, 
exacerbating existing tensions and adding to the potential for conflicts.

Hazards resulting from the increasing intensity and frequency of extreme 
weather events, such as abnormally heavy rainfall, prolonged droughts, 
desertification, environmental degradation, or sea-level rise and 
cyclones are already causing an average of more than 20 million people 
to leave their homes and move to other areas in their countries each year.

Some people are forced to cross borders in the context of climate change 
and disasters and may in some circumstances be in need of international 
protection. Refugee and human rights law therefore have an important 
role to play in this area.
- -
[T]he term “climate refugee” is not endorsed by UNHCR, and it is more 
accurate to refer to “persons displaced in the context of disasters and 
climate change.”
https://www.unhcr.org/en-us/climate-change-and-disasters.html



/[ The Nation magazine ] /
*Want to Fight Climate Change? Look to Local Politics.*
Since its founding in 2015, the New Haven Climate Movement has used 
national momentum to create regional change with a model that can be 
replicated around the country.
By Charlotte Hughes - Sept 14, 2022
- -
In Connecticut, the New Haven Climate Movement shows just how much local 
politics still matters. The group recently used national momentum to 
create regional change, pushing the municipal council to delegate $5 
million of its American Rescue Plan funding toward local projects aimed 
at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/climate-change-new-haven-local-politics/

- -

/[ one city's movement]/
*The New Haven Climate Movement*
We are a coalition from across New Haven working to restore a safe 
climate. We are facing a climate emergency. We need strong action now.
Our Current Campaigns:

    - Climate Justice Schools / Schools as Climate Leaders
    - BoE Climate Emergency Resolution
    - New Haven Rescue Plan: Act Now on Climate Emergency
    - Electric Future Campaign
    - 2023 Campaign
    - New Haven Bike Vision: Reduce Transportation Pollution Now

https://www.newhavenclimatemovement.org/


/
/

/[ arresting visual -- graphic of the day ]/
*Air Temperature Rank by Month*
https://twitter.com/Supermoosie/status/1256866022822301699/photo/1
https://twitter.com/ZLabe/status/1510724788485951491/photo/1



/[The news archive - looking back]/
/*September 15, 2002*/
September 15, 2002: The New York Times reports:

"For the first time in six years, the annual federal report on air
pollution trends has no section on global warming, though President
Bush has said that slowing the growth of emissions linked to warming
is a priority for his administration.

"The decision to delete the chapter on climate change was made by top
officials at the Environmental Protection Agency with White House
approval, White House officials said."

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/15/us/with-white-house-approval-epa-pollution-report-omits-global-warming-section.html


=======================================
*Mass media is lacking, here are a few daily summariesof global warming 
news - email delivered*

=========================================================
**Inside Climate News*
Newsletters
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or 
once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines 
deliver the full story, for free.
https://insideclimatenews.org/
---------------------------------------
**Climate Nexus* https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News summarizes the 
most important climate and energy news of the day, delivering an 
unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting. It also provides 
original reporting and commentary on climate denial and pro-polluter 
activity that would otherwise remain largely unexposed.    5 weekday
=================================
*Carbon Brief Daily https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up*
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon Brief 
sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to thousands of 
subscribers around the world. The email is a digest of the past 24 hours 
of media coverage related to climate change and energy, as well as our 
pick of the key studies published in the peer-reviewed journals.
more at https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief
==================================
*T*he Daily Climate *Subscribe https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate impacts, 
solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better than coffee.
Other newsletters  at https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/ 

/Archive of Daily Global Warming News 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/


/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
to news digest./

   Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only.  It does not carry 
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers.  A 
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and 
sender. This is a hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial 
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote 
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, 
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for 
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct 
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List 
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to 
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20220915/22ad37da/attachment.htm>


More information about the theClimate.Vote mailing list