[✔️] January 28, 2023- Global Warming News Digest - good news, twitter mis-info, searcjh engine power, greenwashing
Richard Pauli
Richard at CredoandScreed.com
Sat Jan 28 09:53:34 EST 2023
/*January 28, 2023*/
/[ Authentic good news progress -- praiseworthy- ]/
*Global climate policy is gaining steam*
The Beacon
Joseph Winters
*It’s Friday, January 27, and global climate commitments gained
significant steam over the past few months.*
The period between October and January saw the “strongest quarterly
results” in the number and strength of climate-related policy and
technology developments around the world since November 2021, according
to a new assessment released on Wednesday. The analysis illustrates
promising progress toward a pathway to limit global warming to 1.8
degrees Celsius (3.2 degrees Fahrenheit).
“The EU and U.S. are now primed for a race to the top on clean
technology as climate objectives take center stage,” said the analysis
from Inevitable Policy Response, or IPR — a research group commissioned
by the U.N.-backed Principles for Responsible Investment.
Out of 117 climate-related policy and technology pledges and
announcements made between October and January, 84 were projected to
align with the 1.8-degree goal, while 17 were deemed “evidence of
acceleration” — meaning they could keep global warming even lower. These
include initiatives from the United States to reduce emissions from its
transportation, buildings, power, and industrial sectors, supported by
record funding in President Joe Biden’s climate spending bill. The U.S.,
Canada, Australia, and the EU have continued planning a phaseout of
gasoline-powered cars and addressing methane from agriculture, while
Brazilian and EU pledges to protect forests are making progress to end
deforestation by 2030.
China, which continues to lead the world in clean energy manufacturing,
has also announced new objectives to achieve carbon neutrality. A
separate analysis from IPR says trade competition among China and the
U.S. and EU could lead to more ambitious climate action. That rivalry
could drive major countries to build more clean energy capacity than
ever before, IPR said.
Recent commitments made under the Just Energy Transition Partnership, a
program in which wealthy countries and investment banks help finance the
phaseout of coal-fired power generation in the Global South, is expected
to ramp down emissions in South Africa, Indonesia, and Vietnam. An
assessment from the London School of Economics finds that national and
international climate policies are increasingly prioritizing such “just
transition” concepts, which broadly seek to deliver the benefits of
clean-energy investment to underserved communities and to countries that
have contributed little to the planet’s cumulative greenhouse gas
emissions...
https://grist.org/beacon/?utm_campaign=beacon&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter
/[ Yale Climate Connections and Jeff Masters ]/
*Climate change is increasing the risk of a California megaflood*
A 2022 study says climate change has already doubled the risk of a
California megaflood. And an additional 1°C of global warming would
double the odds again.
by JEFF MASTERS
JANUARY 27, 2023
- -
The Golden State has a long history of cataclysmic floods, which have
occurred about every 200 to 400 years — most recently in the Great Flood
of 1861-62. And a future warmer climate will likely significantly
increase the risk of even more extreme floods. In particular, a 2022
study found that, relative to a century ago, climate change has already
doubled the risk of a present-day megastorm, and more than tripled the
risk of a trillion-dollar megaflood of the type that could swamp the
Central Valley.
Given the increased risk, it is more likely than not that many of you
reading this will see a California megaflood costing tens of billions in
your lifetime...
- -
The study concluded that every additional degree Celsius of global
warming slightly more than doubles the risk of a megaflood.
ARkHist-level events have a 1% chance per year of occurring
(1-in-100-year recurrence) with Earth’s current global warming level of
1.2 degree Celsius above pre-industrial temperatures. If global warming
hits 2.2 degrees, an ARkHist-level megastorm would have a 2.2% chance of
occurring per year (a 1-in-45-year recurrence interval) — a dramatic
increase in risk, especially given the catastrophic nature of a megaflood...
- -
Given California’s megaflood history and the potential increasing flood
risk from climate change, it is essential for the state to continue to
upgrade its flood infrastructure, policies, and flood-awareness efforts.
It’s good to see the state has taken positive steps in that direction.
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2023/01/climate-change-is-increasing-the-risk-of-a-california-megaflood/
/[ Fast Company reports on battles for the hearts and minds ]/
*Climate change misinformation has risen 300% on Twitter*
New research shows climate misinformation has been flourishing on
Twitter since Elon Musk purchased the platform in 2022.
01-24-23
BY DAVID KLEPPER -- ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) — Search for the word “climate” on Twitter and the first
automatic recommendation isn’t “climate crisis” or “climate jobs” or
even “climate change” but instead “climate scam.”
Clicking on the recommendation yields dozens of posts denying the
reality of climate change and making misleading claims about efforts to
mitigate it.
Such misinformation has flourished on Twitter since it was bought by
Elon Musk last year, but the site isn’t the only one promoting content
that scientists and environmental advocates say undercuts public support
for policies intended to respond to a changing climate.
“What’s happening in the information ecosystem poses a direct threat to
action,” said Jennie King, head of climate research and response at the
Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a London-based nonprofit. “It plants
those seeds of doubt and makes people think maybe there isn’t scientific
consensus.”
The institute is part of a coalition of environmental advocacy groups
that on Thursday released a report tracking climate change
disinformation in the months before, during, and after the UN climate
summit in November.
The report faulted social media platforms for, among other things,
failing to enforce their own policies prohibiting climate change
misinformation. It is only the latest to highlight the growing problem
of climate misinformation on Twitter.
Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, allowed nearly 4,000
advertisements on its site—most bought by fossil fuel companies—that
dismissed the scientific consensus behind climate change and criticized
efforts to respond to it, the researchers found.
In some cases, the ads and the posts cited inflation and economic fears
as reasons to oppose climate policies, while ignoring the costs of
inaction. Researchers also found that a significant number of the
accounts posting false claims about climate change also spread
misinformation about U.S. elections, COVID-19 and vaccines.
Twitter did not respond to questions from The Associated Press. A
spokesperson for Meta cited the company’s policy prohibiting ads that
have been proven false by its fact-checking partners, a group that
includes the AP. The ads identified in the report had not been fact-checked.
Under Musk, Twitter laid off thousands of employees and made changes to
its content moderation that its critics said undercut the effort. In
November, the company announced it would no longer enforce its policy
against COVID-19 misinformation. Musk also reinstated many formerly
banned users, including several who had spread misleading claims about
climate change. Instances of hate speech and attacks on LGBTQ people
soared...
Tweets containing “climate scam” or other terms linked to climate change
denial rose 300% in 2022, according to a report released last week by
the nonprofit Advance Democracy. While Twitter had labeled some of the
content as misinformation, many of the popular posts were not labeled.
Musk’s new verification system could be part of the problem, according
to a report from the Center for Countering Digital Hate, another
organization that tracks online misinformation. Previously, the blue
checkmarks were held by people in the public eye, such as journalists,
government officials, or celebrities.
Now, anyone willing to pay $8 a month can seek a checkmark. Posts and
replies from verified accounts are given an automatic boost on the
platform, making them more visible than content from users who don’t pay.
When researchers at the Center for Countering Digital Hate analyzed
accounts verified after Musk took over, they found they spread four
times the amount of climate change misinformation compared with users
verified before Musk’s purchase.
Verification systems are typically created to assure users that the
accounts they follow are legitimate. Twitter’s new system, however,
makes no distinction between authoritative sources on climate change and
anyone with $8 and an opinion, according to Imran Ahmed, the center’s
chief executive.
“We found,” Ahmed said, “it has in fact put rocket boosters on the
spread of lies and disinformation.”
https://www.fastcompany.com/90839371/climate-change-misinformation-has-risen-300-on-twitter
- -
/[ when scouting the information battleground, just //follow the money //] /
*Google let Daily Wire advertise to climate crisis deniers, research shows*
Exclusive: Data shared by the Center for Countering Digital Hate shows
that Ben Shapiro’s news site paid for climate crisis denial search term ads
Geoff Dembicki in New York
Fri 27 Jan 2023
A media outlet founded by conservative influencer Ben Shapiro paid
Google to advertise on search pages questioning whether the climate
crisis is real, according to new research from a disinformation watchdog
group.
The Daily Wire bought ads on search terms over the past year such as
“climate change is a hoax” and “why is climate change fake,” meaning
that when people Googled these phrases, stories from Shapiro’s outlet
were some of the first results that appeared, the research found.
Google sold these ads even after announcing a new policy in October 2021
prohibiting ads that promote climate crisis denial. Its CEO, Sundar
Pichai, publicly stated at the time that “when people come to Google
Search with questions about climate change, we’ll show authoritative
information from sources like the United Nations.”
“Google’s hypocrisy knows no bounds,” said Imran Ahmed, CEO of the US
and UK-based Center for Countering Digital Hate, which provided its
research exclusively to the Guardian. “They’re actually selling the
right to climate deniers to spread disinformation.”
A spokesperson for Google didn’t contest the center’s new findings about
The Daily Wire but said that “when we find content that crosses the line
from policy debate or a discussion of green initiatives to promoting
outright climate change denial, we remove those ads.”
The Daily Wire didn’t respond to a list of detailed questions about its
Google ad buys.
For its research, Ahmed’s organization relied upon a commercial
analytics tool called Semrush, which is used by many Fortune 500
companies and shows the Google phrases and search terms that brands
advertise on. Semrush also provides estimates of the dollar amounts
companies are spending on digital marketing efforts.
Based on these estimates, researchers say that The Daily Wire could have
spent almost as much as $60m on more than 150 Google search term ads
over the past two years on various topics. These search term ads also
included such phrases as “argument against reparations”, “bill gates
population control”, and “why does george soros hate america.” More than
a dozen of the search terms were climate-related, including:
‘climate change is a hoax’
‘climate change is a lie’
‘why is climate change fake’
‘climate change debunk’
‘the real truth about wind turbines’
‘is global warming a scam’
‘the climate change scam’
The Google spokesperson would not comment on the spending estimate.
The center focused on The Daily Wire because it is among the most
popular publishers on Facebook, with levels of engagement that at times
have surpassed the combined digital reach of the New York Times,
Washington Post, NBC News and CNN.
In November 2021, the Center for Countering Digital Hate named The Daily
Wire in a report as one of the top ten spreaders of climate
disinformation on Facebook, along with other far-right outlets such as
Breitbart, Newsmax and the Western Journal. Shapiro’s outlet, which
reported more than $100m in revenue in 2021, was started with $4.7m in
seed funding from Texas fracking billionaire Farris Wilks.
In its latest research, the center said it found multiple instances of
The Daily Wire promoting climate crisis denial through its Google
advertisements. When people Googled the phrase “climate change debunk”
in April 2022, one of the top results they were shown was an article
authored by Shapiro entitled “Debunking Climate Change Hysteria”.
“You’ve heard that climate change is going to put an end to all life on
Earth; that it puts civilization in existential peril,” Shapiro claimed
in the article. “These are lies.”
Another Daily Wire ad from last summer linked the search phrase “climate
change a hoax” – along with deliberately misspelled phrases like “gobal
warming hoax” and “climate change hiax” – to the outlet’s 2016 article
“9 Things You Need To Know About The Climate Change Hoax”, in which
Aaron Bandler falsely claimed that “there is no evidence that the Earth
has been warming in recent years.”
“In accordance with our policy against climate change denial content,
Google ads aren’t running on this page, nor is this page being promoted
in Google ads,” Google said in relation to this specific article.
But Google’s policies allow some wiggle room. “We will also continue to
allow ads and monetization on other climate-related topics, including
public debates on climate policy, the varying impacts of climate change,
new research and more,” its policy says.
Last July, The Daily Wire paid Google to promote its story “Wind
Turbines Not Only Shred Birds But Are Piling Up In Landfills” anytime
someone searched “the real truth about wind turbines”.
Shapiro’s outlet has pushed discredited theories on a wide range of
topics, including buying an ad last July on the search term “george
floyd cause of death” which linked to a Daily Wire article stating that
it likely was a fentanyl overdose, not police violence, that killed
George Floyd in 2020. A Reuters fact-check recently found “no evidence”
for this claim.
But on Google you don’t need to be factually correct in order to shape
people’s opinions, the disinformation group pointed out. “Ninety-nine
percent of Google clicks go to results on the first page,” Ahmed said.
“If you can be the first result on a Google search, you essentially get
to set the truth.”
The Daily Wire’s climate ads are particularly egregious according to the
Center for Countering Digital Hate because Google publicly presents
itself as having one of the most aggressive sustainability plans of any
large tech company.
It promises to achieve the goal of “net-zero” carbon emissions in its
operations by 2030, ten years earlier than Amazon. Last year, the
company teamed up with the United Nations to provide people with “short
and easy-to-understand information panels and visuals on the causes and
effects of climate change” when they search for the topic on Google.
Yet in a report last year the Center for Countering Digital Hate found
that major climate polluters like BP, ExxonMobil, Chevron and Shell were
purchasing ads on Google searches such as “net-zero” and “eco-friendly”,
giving the impression that these companies were helping to fix the
climate crisis instead of being the main contributors to it.
Ahmed said The Daily Wire ad buys appear to be a direct contradiction of
Google’s own promises to promote reliable information on the climate
crisis: “Google has rules against their search ads being used to spread
disinformation, they should be enforcing them, even against people who
give them lots of money.”
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/27/daily-wire-google-ads-climate-crisis-deniers
- -
/[ finding the source of misinformation - clips from report ]/
*GREENWASHING ON GOOGLE*
How Google Profits by Cleaning Big Oil’s Reputation.
The Center for Countering Digital Hate is a US-headquartered
international nonprofit NGO that disrupts the architecture of online
hate and misinformation.
Digital technology has changed forever the way we communicate, build
relationships,
share knowledge, set social standards, and negotiate and assert our
societies’ values.
Digital spaces have been colonized and their unique dynamics exploited by
malignant actors that instrumentalize hate and misinformation. These
movements
are opportunistic, agile, and confident in exerting influence and
persuading people.
Over time these malignant actors, advocating diverse causes - from hatred of
women to racial and religious intolerance to science-denial - have
formed a digital
Counter- Enlightenment. The disinformation they spread to bolster their
causes has
socialized the offline world for the worse.
The Center’s work combines both analysis and active disruption of these
networks.
CCDH’s solutions seek to increase the economic, political, and social
costs of all
parts of the infrastructure - the actors, systems, and culture - that
support and profit
from hate and misinformation
*2 Executive Summary*
Google accepted $23.7m for ads from Big Oil in the last two years
• Analysis of Big Oil ads placed on Google Search by five of the world’s
biggest oil
companies and carbon emitters show they spent $23.7m since September 2020.
• Researchers used the enterprise analytics tool Semrush to analyze US
Google Search
ad spending by British Petroleum (BP), ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell and
Aramco which
are together accountable for 14% of global carbon emissions since 1965.
Big Oil devoted $10.9m of this ad spend to misleading greenwashing ads
viewed 58.6m times
• Greenwashing is when companies use green messaging to appear more
climate friendly
and environmentally sustainable than they really are.
• Big Oil spent $10.9m to target US Google Search users with
greenwashing ads in the last
two years, which were viewed an estimated 58.6m times, including:
• $1.8m to target users searching for information on greenhouse gasses
• $1.7m to target queries about renewables
• $1.2m to target queries about carbon offsets
• $5.2m to target users searching for information about Big Oil
companies
• All five Big Oil companies targeted users searching for “eco
friendly” companies
• Internal oil company documents published by the US Committee on
Oversight and
Reform show Big Oil is deliberately misleading Google Search users.
Google accepted a further $421,000 for ads from a climate denial
organization
• Competitive Enterprise Institute ads claimed “climate campaigners
hype the risks of
global warming” and “fossil fuels make the planet safer”.
Google should come clean and stop profiting from greenwashing
• Google must keep its promise not to profit from climate denial
content, which means
halting denial ads from the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
• Google must stop distorting search results with greenwashing ads,
extending its existing
commitments to bar Big Oil from using its technologies to prolong
the climate crisis.
• Google should introduce a transparent ad library, so the public
can examine how
corporations like Big Oil use ads to systematically distort search
results.
• Legislators should adopt CCDH’s STAR Framework for regulation of
Big Tech that
delivers Safety by Design, Transparency, Accountability and
Responsibility.
• The FTC should update its guidance on deceptive ads in light of
Big Oil greenwashing.
Greenwashing is where a company uses advertising and public messaging to
appear
more climate friendly and environmentally sustainable than it really is.
It’s also a
technique used by certain companies to distract consumers from the fact
that their
business model and activities actually do a lot of environmental harm
and damage.
*3 Why greenwashing ads on Google Search matter*
The vast majority of Americans use Google Search to find information on
topics they care
about, and consider that information to be trustworthy.
Google dominates the search market in the United States, commanding a
market share of
87%.1
Users also have a high degree of trust in search engines: 73% believe
that most or all of
the information they find in search is accurate and trustworthy.2
Users have a particularly high level of trust in the top-ranked results
provided by search
engines, even where they are less relevant or less credible than
lower-ranked results.3
This is important because ads placed on Google Search appear at the top
of the page when
people use Google to search the web, deliberately resembling organic
search results. Studies
have shown that 68% of users are unable to distinguish these ads from
organic search results.4
Accordingly, many of the users who turn to Google Search to find
information will encounter
Google ads at the top of search results and consider the information
they contain to be
credible.
It is for all of these reasons that Big Oil companies are placing ads on
Google Search in a bid to
target and influence users searching for information about climate
change and the role that oil
and gas companies play in the climate crisis...
Examples of greenwashing identified by our research include ads
targeting people using
Google to search for information on “eco friendly companies”, “how to
reduce greenhouse gas
emissions” and “pros and cons of paris climate agreement”. These ads
distort search results,
presenting users with Big Oil’s preferred answers to key questions about
climate change.
This report reveals the full extent to which Google has profited from
Big Oil ad campaigns that
aim to influence users searching for information about their
contributions to climate change...
- -
*4 Google accepted $23.7m from Big Oil over two years*
Five of the world’s largest oil and gas companies, ExxonMobil, BP,
Chevron, Shell and Aramco,
have spent a combined total of $23.7 million over two years on US Google
Search ads...
- -
*5 Google accepted $10.9m for oil and gas greenwashing ads over two years*
Using the data analytics tool Semrush, researchers compiled a dataset of
32,816 US Google
Search ads placed by the Big Oil companies on 61,216 separate search
queries between 1
September 2020 and 31 August 2022, and the amount they spent on each one.
In total, the five Big Oil companies studied by this report spent $10.9
million on US Google
Search ads that constitute greenwashing, nearly half of their total
Google Search ad spend...
- -
*Big Oil prioritizes ads on searches for greenhouse gasses, renewables
and carbon offsets*
The analysis of ads running under search queries related to
environmental sustainability found
that the type of query with the highest combined expenditure from the
companies was those
about greenhouse gasses, on which the companies spent a combined total
of $1.8 million. This
included ads on searches like “methane” and “what are greenhouse gasses?”
- -
*Big Oil companies targeted users searching for “eco friendly” companies*
All five of the Big Oil companies advertised under searches about being
“eco friendly”
- -
*5A Google accepted over $5.3m from BP for greenwashing ads over two years*
BP has the sixth biggest carbon footprint out of the Climate
Accountability Institute’s list
of top global polluters, having produced 34.02 billion tonnes of CO2
since 1965.11 After an
emissions drop of 10% from 2019 to 2020, BP admitted a relapse in
emission levels in 2021,
which they in part blame on the “rebound in economic growth” as a result
of the Covid-19
pandemic
- -
*5B Google accepted $4m for ExxonMobil greenwashing ads over two years*
ExxonMobil has the fourth biggest carbon footprint according to the Climate
Accountability Institute’s list of top global polluters, having
produced 41.9 billion tonnes of carbon emissions since 1965.16
The oil giant was recently called out by investors for lagging behind
its peers on climate change policy...
- -
ExxonMobil promoted Paris Agreement while planning for its failure
ExxonMobil spent nearly $144,904 on ads targeting search queries relating to
environmental policies, particularly on searches for “paris climate
agreement” in
attempts to affirm its commitment to the treaty. ..
- -
*5C Google accepted $1.2m from Shell for greenwashing ads over two years*
Shell has the seventh biggest carbon footprint out of the Climate
Accountability Institute’s list of top global polluters, contributing 31.95
billion tonnes of carbon to the 480 billion emitted since 1965.24
- -
*5D Google accepted $317,710 from Aramco for greenwashing ads over two
years*
State-owned Saudi Aramco has the largest carbon footprint of all
companies on the Climate
Accountability Institute’s list of top global polluters, having produced
4.38% of the 480 billion
tonnes of CO2 emitted since 1965.29
Despite a collective pledge to reduce carbon emissions by 13% by 2025
as part of the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative, Aramco continues to operate
over 100 oil and gas fields, the total area of which outweighs the combined
reserves of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and Total...
- -
*Aramco ads promote claim it is “one of the lowest carbon emitters in
our industry”*
Google Search ads placed by Aramco link to a website claiming the
company is “one of
the lowest carbon emitters in our industry” despite expert assessments
that rank it as
one of biggest carbon emitters since 1965.31
- -
*5E Google accepted $112,854 for Chevron greenwashing ads over two years*
Chevron has the second largest carbon footprint on the Climate
Accountability
Institute’s list of top global polluters since 1965...
- -
*6 Internal documents expose gap between greenwashing ads and reality*
Internal documents from four companies investigated by this report
reveal the extent to which
greenwashing ads misrepresent the reality of Big Oil’s continued pursuit
of fossil fuel profits...
. .
*7 Google accepted $421,000 to run ads from a climate denial organization*
In addition to the ad revenue it has received from oil and gas
companies, Google accepted an
additional $421,000 from the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) to
serve ads linked to blog
posts promoting climate denial...
- -
*8 Recommendations: Google should come clean and stop profiting from
**greenwashing*
The immediate challenge to Google is clear: stop profiting from Big Oil
ads designed to mislead
the public and keep your promises to stop profiting from climate denial.
That leads on to a deeper, long-term problem that Google needs to
address. It starts with
acknowledging that Google got away with gaslighting us on its climate
change policies
because it keeps the public in the dark over the ads it runs.
- -
*1 Google must keep its promise not to profit from climate denial
content...*
*2 Google must stop profiting from Big Oil ads that distort climate
change search results*
Google has already accepted the principle that its technologies should
not be used by Big
Oil companies in ways that could worsen or prolong the climate crisis.
It must now apply that
same principle to the ad services that Big Oil exploits to distort
users’ search results...
*3 Google must create a public and transparent ad library*
Google’s ad transparency tools are currently so limited that ordinary
members of the
public have no means by which to examine how corporations like Big Oil
are using ads to
systematically influence search results...
- -
Greenwashing on Google, Published 3 November 2022
© Center for Countering Digital Hate Inc
https://counterhate.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Greenwashing-on-Google_Final-Report.pdf
/[ Top climate scientist Prof Stefan Rahmsdorf talks about the
inevitable AMOC collapse ]/
*Is the Atlantic Ocean circulation approaching a tipping point?*
Earth System Analysis - Potsdam Institute
8,502 views Jan 22, 2023
10-minute keynote by Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf at the Exeter 'Tipping
Points' Conference, 12 September 2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xl-Xd-z2qkw
/[The news archive - looking back -- I remember that news event. I was
20 years old. It was a very big deal. ]/
/*January 28, 1969*/
January 28, 1969: The notorious Santa Barbara, California oil spill
takes place.
http://youtu.be/jqd_VTADHzM
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/06/30/3453277/oil-spill-heard-round-the-world/
=======================================
*Mass media is lacking, many daily summariesdeliver global warming news
- a few are email delivered*
=========================================================
**Inside Climate News*
Newsletters
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or
once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines
deliver the full story, for free.
https://insideclimatenews.org/
---------------------------------------
**Climate Nexus* https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News summarizes the
most important climate and energy news of the day, delivering an
unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting. It also provides
original reporting and commentary on climate denial and pro-polluter
activity that would otherwise remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday
=================================
*Carbon Brief Daily https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up*
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon Brief
sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to thousands of
subscribers around the world. The email is a digest of the past 24 hours
of media coverage related to climate change and energy, as well as our
pick of the key studies published in the peer-reviewed journals.
more at https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief
==================================
*T*he Daily Climate *Subscribe https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate impacts,
solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better than coffee.
Other newsletters at https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender. This is a personal hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20230128/773c4f3b/attachment.htm>
More information about the theClimate.Vote
mailing list