[✔️] June 17, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | Big changes to COP27. Aviation industry, collapse, Education steps up, NPR asks experts, Predicament explained, Bill Reese on Overshoot. 2011 awakening
Richard Pauli
Richard at CredoandScreed.com
Sat Jun 17 08:42:17 EDT 2023
- Previous message (by thread): [✔️] June 16, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | New temps, Montana court case, optimistic youth, author, Monbiot on climate politics, McKibben heat records, MIT open course, 2008 Gore-Obama
- Next message (by thread): [✔️] June 18, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | Inside China report, Kevin Anderson, Far-right politics and climate, The Big Myth - new book, 2015 MIT gets serious
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
/*June*//*17, 2023*/
/[ big changes to COP27 - BBC's Matt McGrath//Environment correspondent ]/
*Climate change: UN to unmask fossil fuel lobbyists at climate talks*
6-16-2023
COP27
Oil, gas and coal representatives will have to disclose their industry
ties at future climate meetings, the UN says.
For years, fossil fuel employees have been able to attend without having
to be clear about their relationship with their companies.
Last year, over 600 industry participants were able to enter the COP27
meeting in Egypt...
- -
The problem though is that often employees of coal, oil and gas
companies are not open about their affiliations.
At COP26 in Glasgow, there were more delegates from the fossil fuel
industries than from any single country.
Last year at COP27 in Egypt, the numbers had swollen by a quarter, with
more than 600 representatives according to analysis from campaign group,
Global Witness...
- -
However while information on a delegate's affiliation will now be
mandatory, participants will be allowed to opt out on the nature of
their relationship to that organisation.
There will also be no requirement to say who's financing the trip to the
COP.
If delegates do opt out from providing some information, the UN will
publish these blank answers in their lists, allowing people to draw
their own conclusions.
- -
"The credibility of this process is under threat. Let's remember there
is nowhere else to go to solve these issues," warned UN climate
executive secretary Simon Stiell.
There was also ongoing rancour about the role of Sultan Al Jaber from
the United Arab Emirates, who will preside over COP28.
Many have questioned the suitability of an oil company chief executive
for this crucial role.
Supporters say he is well positioned to help major oil producing nations
transition away from fossil fuels.
On a short visit to the talks last week, Sultan Al Jaber said that the
"phasedown of fossil fuels is inevitable".
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-65917660
/[ the mechanics of airplanes makes the aviation industry most
difficult to mitigate pollution. Carbon combustion is just too powerful
- more likely an all or nothing solution]/
*Aviation industry split on whether 2050 net zero goal achievable, GE
survey shows*
Reuters
June 15, 2023
PARIS, June 15 (Reuters) - The aviation industry is split on whether it
can meet its climate targets with almost a third of its sustainability
executives predicting it will miss a mid-century deadline, a survey
commissioned by GE Aerospace suggested on Thursday.
Published ahead of the Paris Airshow, the global survey showed just
below half - or 46% - of the 325 executives surveyed believe the
industry will meet its goal of net zero emissions by 2050, while 32%
believe it will not and 22% are unsure.
Most believe the industry will meet its objectives by 2055, however.
"Respondents are split as to whether progress is happening at the right
pace, with 51% saying it is too slow, adding a sense of urgency to a
longer-term target," GE Aerospace said.
The aviation industry set a 2050 goal of net zero emissions in 2021. The
main path is widespread use of Sustainable Aviation Fuel, which so far
makes up 0.1% of airline fuel consumption.
Environmental critics say the targets are unrealistic due to the low
level of SAF available and argue the only way to reach them is to
substantially reduce flying globally.
Rising costs and supply issues are among the biggest hurdles and the
industry needs more support, GE said in a poll summary.
"The survey is trying to show that this is ambitious, (but) it's not
going to be easy," Allen Paxson, vice president of commercial programs
strategy at the U.S. engine maker said in an interview, adding he
believed the target would be met.
"It's a sign that people are taking it really seriously. The fact that
some people forecast differently than other people is okay: let's get
our heads around it and get on with it."
The head of the International Air Transport Association, Willie Walsh,
said last week airlines were "absolutely committed" to the 2050 target
but reaching it would be tough.
GE said 74% of respondents said they would maintain or grow green
investments in the face of inflation or recession.
The survey was carried out last month by Ipsos in the United States, UK,
China, India, the UAE and France.
https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/aviation-industry-split-whether-2050-net-zero-goal-achievable-ge-survey-2023-06-15/
/[ Succinct opinion message of collapse - 3 minutes ]/
*Green Transition (Not)*
Just Collapse
Apr 29, 2023
Did you know that ‘renewables’ aren’t possible without coal? Associate
Professor of Geometallurgy, Simon Michaux of the Geological Survey of
Finland, gets real about our energy and overshoot predicament. This
event was hosted by Associate Professor Kate Booth, and the University
of Tasmania.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9BUzrDZOuc
/[ Big changes in education - state by state -- NJ, and next Connecticut
schools begin studies for all children starting in July ]/
*Penguins in Your Fridge? These 7-Year-Olds Have Climate Solutions.*
New Jersey is the first state to require that climate change be taught
at all grade levels. The focus is on problem solving, not doom and gloom.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/15/climate/climate-education-schools-children.html?unlocked_article_code=kyAUnc5MzHJwfHxu1mJdq_xzb7xNFVuw7XQ8gsFYsqSlECr4cUrl84n9uatIFOM2sYC9KOpK0oPcfLDDgSydzwzaDU-Ke-V25_Rp9KnLDUw4KCOw4xQ7GsuGwW5lHn94Y5IwEVK2RPHXA2KneuU5YRcXzuYgg9K4VQn4mxgmEWR-bxff1LCPlWkkMpv2hkl8DOstSQIYejxUdH-i3WPrqL8hg-siYdnii_kROuYyYHt42RiPOY57n2FqGSMxzGQvUgKlhAtvmiTS5-XxRDX0mrgBLansA9SDYwsqrEFz4PzTZviZCoQ6GhQRSeQDwcfOBYD8XySAXzrUh8NmsM1tZGSdBvrjr1tJUCDoLA&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
/[ Audio report - NPR told us of solutions long ago -
https://www.wbur.org/npr/1160783951/6-scholars-explain-what-a-real-climate-solution-is
]/
*Climate solutions do exist. These 6 experts detail what they look like*
March 5, 2023
Julia Simon
Scientists say there's a lot we can still do to slow the speed of
climate change. But when it comes to "climate solutions", some are real,
and some aren't, says Naomi Oreskes, historian of science at Harvard
University. "This space has become really muddied," she says.
So how does someone figure out what's legit? We asked six climate
scholars for the questions they ask themselves whenever they come across
something claiming to be a climate solution.
A big climate solution is an obvious one
It may sound basic, but one big way to address climate change is to
reduce the main human activity that caused it in the first place:
burning fossil fuels.
Scientists say that means ultimately transitioning away from oil, coal
and gas and becoming more energy efficient. We already have a lot of the
technology we need to make this transition, like solar, wind, and
batteries, Oreskes says.
"What we need to do right now is to mobilize the technologies that
already exist, that work and are cost competitive, and that essentially
means renewable energy and storage," she says.
Think about who's selling you the solution
It's important to think about both who's selling you the climate
solution and what they say the problem is, says Melissa Aronczyk,
professor of media at Rutgers University.
"People like to come up with solutions, but to do that, they usually
have to interpret the problem in a way that works for them," she says.
Oreskes says pay attention when you see a "climate solution" that means
increasing the use of fossil fuels. She says an example is natural gas,
which has been sold as a "bridge fuel" from coal to renewable energy.
But natural gas is still a fossil fuel, and its production, transport
and use release methane, a greenhouse gas far more potent than carbon
dioxide.
"I think we need to start by looking at what happens when the fossil
fuel industry comes up with solutions, because here is the greatest
potential for conflict of interest," Aronczyk says.
A solution may sound promising, but is it available and scalable now?
Sometimes you'll hear about new promising technology like carbon
removal, which vacuums carbon dioxide out of the air and stores it
underground, says David Ho, a professor of oceanography at University of
Hawaii at Manoa.
Ho researches climate solutions and he says ask yourself: is this
technology available, affordable, or scalable now?
"I think people who don't work in this space think we have all these
technologies that are ready to remove carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere, for instance. And we're not there," Ho says...
- -
If it's adding emissions, it's not a climate solution
These days all kinds of companies, from airlines to wedding dress
companies, might offer to let you buy "carbon offsets" along with your
purchase. That offset money could do something like build a new wind
farm or plant trees that would - in theory - soak up and store the
equivalent carbon dioxide emissions of taking a flight or making a new
dress.
But there are often problems with regulation and verification of
offsets, says Roberto Schaeffer, a professor of energy economics at the
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. "It's very dangerous,
very dangerous indeed," he says.
WBUR is a nonprofit news organization. Our coverage relies on your
financial support. If you value articles like the one you're reading
right now, give today.
He says with offsets from forests, it's hard to verify if the trees are
really being protected, that those trees won't get cut down or burned in
a wildfire.
"You cannot guarantee, 'Okay, you're gonna offset your dress by planting
a tree.' You have no guarantee that in three years time that tree is
gonna be there," he says.
If you make emissions thinking you're offsetting them, and the offset
doesn't work, that's doubling the emissions, says Adrienne Buller, a
climate finance researcher and director of research at Common Wealth, a
think tank in the United Kingdom, "It's sort of like doubly bad."
*If a solution sounds too easy, be skeptical*
Many things sold as carbon offsets - like restoring or protecting
forests - are, on their own, great climate solutions, Buller says. "We
need things like trees," she says, "To draw carbon out of the atmosphere."
The problem is when carbon markets sell the idea that you can continue
emitting as usual and everything will be fine if you just buy an offset,
Buller says. "It's kind of a solution that implies that we don't have to
do that much hard work. We can just kind of do some minor tweaks to the
way that we currently do things," she says.
Schaeffer says there is a lot of hard work in our future to get off of
fossil fuels and onto clean energy sources. "So people have to realize
there is a price to pay here. No free lunch."
*It's not all about business. Governments must play a role in solutions,
too*
We often think of businesses working on climate solutions on their own,
but that's often not the case, says Oreskes. Government often plays a
big role in funding and research support for new climate technology,
says June Sekera, a visiting scholar at The New School who studies
public policy and climate.
And governments will also have to play a big role in regulating
emissions, says Schaeffer, who has been working with the United Nations'
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for 25 years.
That's why all the scholars NPR spoke with for this story say one big
climate solution is to vote.
Schaeffer points to the recent election in Brazil, where climate change
was a big campaign issue for candidate Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Lula
won, and has promised to address deforestation, a big source of Brazil's
emissions.
There's no one solution to climate change - and no one can do it alone
Aronczyk wants to make one thing clear: there is no one solution to
climate change.
"We're human beings. We encounter a problem, we wanna solve that
problem," Aronczyk says, "But just as there is no one way to describe
climate change, there's no one way to offer a solution."
Climate solutions will take different forms, Sekera says. Some solutions
may slow climate change, some may offer us ways to adapt.
The key thing, Aronczyk says, is that climate solutions will involve
governments, businesses, and individuals. She says: "It is an all hands
on deck kind of a situation."
https://www.wbur.org/npr/1160783951/6-scholars-explain-what-a-real-climate-solution-is
/[ one man's analysis - we have a predicament - bold and brave opinion
- 16 min - we are in a resource war - damned if we do, or don't ]/
*War On The World*
Just Collapse
Nov 28, 2022
This recorded presentation by Just Collapse, at World Beyond War's "War
in a Changing Climate" online forum, identifies the complex
socio-ecological predicament that is collapse and it's implications for
geopolitics, conflict, and war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_W0XKiYPtA
- -
/[ It's all about Overshoot -- a classic lecture ]/
*Our ecological footprint with Dr. William Rees, Professor Emeritus, UBC
*Raincoast Conservation Foundation
Nov 29, 2021
From Conservation and resilience in the Gulf Islands in the age of
climate change and biodiversity loss: A webinar series, Webinar 4.
Learn more: https://www.raincoast.org/gi-webinar/
William E Rees is a human ecologist, ecological economist, former
Director and Professor Emeritus of the University of British Columbia’s
School of Planning in Vancouver, Canada. His research focuses on the
ecological requirements for civilization to persist, energy assessment,
and the behavioural and socio-cultural barriers to change. Best known as
originator and co-developer of ‘ecological footprint analysis,’ Prof
Rees has authored hundreds of peer-reviewed and popular articles on
(un)sustainability. He is an internationally recognized Fellow of the
Royal Society of Canada whose awards include both the Herman Daly Award
and Boulding Memorial Prize in Ecological Economics and a Blue Planet
Prize (jointly with his former student, Dr Mathis Wackernagel).
Investigate. Inform. Inspire.
Raincoast is a team of conservationists and scientists empowered by our
research to protect the lands, waters and wildlife of coastal British
Columbia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l73oIO8oG58
/[The news archive - looking back]/
/*June 17, 2011*/
*June 17, 2011: *Syndicated columnist Steve Chapman notes that at some
point, Republicans will have to knock it off with climate-change denial
and propose solutions to the problem:
"Conservatives fear liberals will use climate change to justify
heavy-handed intrusive regulation and wasteful subsidies, and they
are right to worry. But that’s no excuse for pretending global
warming is a myth or refusing to do anything about it. It’s an
argument for devising cost-effective, market-based remedies that
minimize bureaucratic control.
"If today’s Republican attitude had prevailed four decades ago,
Americans would not have such vital measures as the Clean Air Act
and the Clean Water Act. Then, many people worried that
environmentalism would strangle economic growth and personal
freedom. But both have survived and even flourished.
"Conservatives once understood that corporations are not entitled to
foul the environment, any more than individuals have the right to
dump garbage in the street. Barry Goldwater, the 1964 GOP
presidential nominee, wrote, 'When pollution is found, it should be
halted at the source, even if this requires stringent government
action.'"
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20110617-steve-chapman-republicans-must-return-to-pro-environmental-roots-.ece
=======================================
*Mass media is lacking, many daily summariesdeliver global warming news
- a few are email delivered*
=========================================================
**Inside Climate News*
Newsletters
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or
once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines
deliver the full story, for free.
https://insideclimatenews.org/
---------------------------------------
**Climate Nexus* https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News summarizes the
most important climate and energy news of the day, delivering an
unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting. It also provides
original reporting and commentary on climate denial and pro-polluter
activity that would otherwise remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday
=================================
*Carbon Brief Daily https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up*
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon Brief
sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to thousands of
subscribers around the world. The email is a digest of the past 24 hours
of media coverage related to climate change and energy, as well as our
pick of the key studies published in the peer-reviewed journals.
more at https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief
==================================
*T*he Daily Climate *Subscribe https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate impacts,
solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better than coffee.
Other newsletters at https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender. This is a personal hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20230617/f2a84fe4/attachment.htm>
- Previous message (by thread): [✔️] June 16, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | New temps, Montana court case, optimistic youth, author, Monbiot on climate politics, McKibben heat records, MIT open course, 2008 Gore-Obama
- Next message (by thread): [✔️] June 18, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | Inside China report, Kevin Anderson, Far-right politics and climate, The Big Myth - new book, 2015 MIT gets serious
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the theClimate.Vote
mailing list