[✔️] March 3, 2023- Global Warming News Digest |
Richard Pauli
Richard at CredoandScreed.com
Fri Mar 3 05:50:05 EST 2023
- Previous message (by thread): [✔️] March 2, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | 3x El Nino, Bernie angry, PBS emerging disease, Steel smelt efficiency, TV network coverage of climate, R. Solnit, wind and whales misinformation battle
- Next message (by thread): [✔️] March 4, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | Salt Lake, CO2, Anxiety in children, Snyder Opinion, Rebecca Solnit, Not Too Late, Bernie support, CO2 record,
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
/*March 3, 2023*/
/[ a major disinformation army ]/
*FOX Doesn’t Just Lie About Elections*
When it comes to disinformation, from elections to climate, arguably no
megaphone has been louder and more influential than FOX, owned by Rupert
Murdoch.
- -
The network’s strategic spread of misinformation isn’t isolated to
elections. Nearly every day FOX and the climate deniers it platforms
spread “misinformation and false narratives aimed at tanking efforts to
address the climate crisis,” writes Allison Fisher at Media Matters.
This ranges from the broad lie that human-caused climate change is not
heating our planet to the specific conspiracy theory that wind turbines
are killing whales.
While FOX is a primary driver of climate disinformation, it’s not alone.
Over the last year, the use of terms like “climate hoax” and “climate
scam” has surged online. The language and tactics are reminiscent of Big
Oil’s early propaganda campaigns decades ago to deny the reality of
climate change and “reposition global warming as theory (not fact).”
FOX’s spread of these lies undermines legitimate news organization’s
efforts to inform the public on the scientifically agreed upon facts of
climate change. It also leads news organizations to spend precious
resources chasing false narratives, including the recent fake
controversy that the US government planned to ban gas stoves. This is
not journalism, but it’s what journalism is up against in the
disinformation age, and it’s confusing audiences and damaging society’s
ability to act on climate change in time. Research shows that the more
we hear something, the more likely we are to think it’s true, even if
we’re presented with facts that correct the record.
While the problem is titanic, journalists are not without the tools to
do something about it. This includes employing a few common sense
journalistic practices to avoid spreading dis- and misinformation: Avoid
false equivalences. Be skeptical of fishy claims and sources. If you
must report on a lie, don’t repeat it in the headline. And always check
your facts. When you absolutely must report on a lie, serve up a “truth
sandwich,” a strategy proposed by UC Berkeley linguistics professor
George Lakoff, who studies propaganda. The recipe: To counter
disinformation, state the truth; then refer to the lie, including that
it’s untrue, and finally, repeat the truth.
Tackling disinformation will take major effort on the part of
governments, companies, and citizens, but journalism also has a critical
role to play in stopping its spread. Let’s stay up-to-date on the
disinformation being rampantly circulated so we can warn audiences
against it and set the record straight.
https://mailchi.mp/coveringclimatenow/fox-doesnt-just-lie-about-elections?e=d61cfe5aa4
- -
/[ Disinfo and opinion manipulation battle report ] /
*Climate disinfo surges in denial, conspiracy comeback*
by Roland LLOYD PARRY
JANUARY 31, 2023
Watchdogs are urging social media platforms to tackle climate
disinformation.
False information about climate change flourished online over the past
year, researchers say, with denialist social media posts and conspiracy
theories surging after US environmental reforms and Elon Musk's Twitter
takeover.
"What really surprised us this year was to see a resurgence in language
that is reminiscent of the 1980s: phrases like 'climate hoax' and
'climate scam' that deny the phenomenon of climate change," said Jennie
King, head of civic action at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a
London-based digital research group.
- -
*Blue-tick deniers*
A quarter of all the strongly climate-sceptic tweets came from just 10
accounts, including Canadian right-wing populist party leader Maxime
Bernier and Paul Joseph Watson, editor of conspiracy-theory website
InfoWars, the City research showed.
CCDH pointed the finger at Musk, who reinstated numerous banned Twitter
accounts and allowed users to pay for a blue tick—a mark previously
reserved for accredited "verified" users in the public eye.
"Elon Musk's decision to open up his platform for hate and
disinformation has led to an explosion in climate disinformation on the
platform," said Callum Hood, CCDH's head of research.
Musk himself tweeted in August 2022: "I do think global warming is a
major risk."
- -
*Conspiracy theories*
An analysis by Advance Democracy seen by AFP found the number of Twitter
posts "using climate change denialism terms" more than tripled from 2021
to 2022, reaching over 900,000.
https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/800a/2023/climate-sceptic-tweets.jpg
On TikTok, views of videos using hashtags associated with climate change
denialism increased by 4.9 million, it said.
On YouTube, climate change denial videos got hundreds of thousands of
views, with searches for them bringing up adverts for climate-denial
products.
YouTube spokesperson Elena Hernandez told AFP that in response to the
claim, certain climate-denial ads had been taken down.
https://phys.org/news/2023-01-climate-disinfo-surges-denial-conspiracy.html
/[ David Roberts interview --
https://www.volts.wtf/p/taking-carbon-out-of-the-air-and#details ]/
*Taking carbon out of the air and putting it into concrete*
A conversation with Shashank Samala, CEO of Heirloom, and Robert Niven,
CEO of CarbonCure.
Let me know what you think, and what you’d like to see more of, at
david at volts.wtf.
Mar 1
A conversation with Shashank Samala, CEO of Heirloom, and Robert Niven,
CEO of CarbonCure.
Last month saw the announcement of a pioneering project: a company
called Heirloom Carbon Technologies will capture carbon dioxide from the
ambient air and then hand it off to a company called CarbonCure
Technologies, which will inject the CO2 into concrete made by a company
called Central Concrete. It will mark the first time ever that carbon
from the air is permanently sequestered in concrete.
Heirloom, with runs the US’s only operating direct air capture (DAC)
facility, does not use the familiar capture technique that involves
giant fans. Instead, it binds carbon to exposed rock and then cooks it
out using electric kilns — and then binds more carbon to the rock, in a
circular process. It claims the capture is cheaper and more efficient
than previous methods.
CarbonCure injects the CO2 into a concrete mixer, where it mineralizes,
becoming permanently captured even if the building using the concrete is
demolished. In the process, it strengthens the mix, requiring less
cement and cutting costs.
Direct air capture (DAC) has faced a great deal of skepticism, and
concrete has the reputation as one of the worst carbon offenders, so
this project — one of the first that can fairly be called carbon removal
— could go a long way toward convincing investors that the former can
help the latter change its ways, with a technology that is, at least
some day, commercializable.
I talked with Heirloom CEO Shashank Samala and CarbonCure CEO Robert
Niven about their respective processes, how they work together, and what
the project says about the future of carbon removal.
https://www.volts.wtf/p/taking-carbon-out-of-the-air-and#details
- -
/[ their web site ]/
*CarbonCure - **Cleaner Concrete, Better Business*
CarbonCure creates carbon removal technologies to help the concrete
industry build more efficient businesses and produce cleaner concrete.
The Mission
CarbonCure’s vision is to make its concrete technology standard for
all concrete production across the globe. By realizing the full
potential of CarbonCure’s portfolio of carbon utilization
technologies, the goal of saving 500 million tonnes of embodied
carbon emissions every year could be met—which would be equivalent
to taking 100 million cars off the road.
https://www.carboncure.com/
- -
/[ See a brief video ]/
*“CarbonCure Explainer Video for US Producers” from CarbonCure on Vimeo.*
The video is available for your viewing pleasure at
https://vimeo.com/545545190
/[ interesting to see this on FOX first "I planned every day very
thoroughly to find the next place with electricity." ] /
*Solo woman first to ride across Africa on an electric motorcycle*
Sinje Gottwald had previously circumnavigated the globe
By Gary Gastelu | Fox News
A lot of people are still wary about taking a long trip with an electric
vehicle, but Sinje Gottwald isn’t one of them.
Last month, the German adventurer completed a 124-day solo ride across
the length of Africa on an electric motorcycle.
And you might say it was a piece of … cake.
https://www.foxnews.com/auto/solo-woman-first-ride-africa-electric-motorcycle
/[ philosophy "Hydrocarbon Oligarchy" global warming video ]/
*Is Democracy Doomed? The Global Fight for Our Future | Timothy Snyder |
TED*
TED
Feb 8, 2023 #TEDTalks #TED #democracy
If you think democracy is some kind of inevitable, default setting for
the world, then you aren't going to have it for very long, says
historian and author Timothy Snyder. From World War I to the Russian
invasion of Ukraine, Snyder dives into the structures that uplift and
tear down political systems, offering a historical perspective on the
current state of democracy around the world as well as the patterns of
thought that lead to tyranny. Learn more about a new approach to
democracy that could help create and protect a future of freedom.
This conversation, hosted by TED current affairs curator Whitney
Pennington Rodgers, was part of an exclusive TED Membership event. Visit
http://www.ted.com/membership to become a TED Member.
https://youtu.be/YY6LCOJbve8?t=1422
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY6LCOJbve8
/[ Inside Climate News ]/
*As Emissions From Agriculture Rise and Climate Change Batters American
Farms, Congress Tackles the Farm Bill*
The legislation represents a major chance to tackle emissions, but some
lawmakers vow to keep climate measures out. Advocates call for more
climate-focused conservation.
By Georgina Gustin
March 1, 2023
- -
On Wednesday, the Senate Agriculture committee is holding a hearing on
the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) conservation programs, which
advocacy groups say represent agriculture’s best hope for tackling
climate change. In advance of the hearing, nearly 650 farm,
environmental and policy groups called for Congressional leaders to
focus on conservation funding.
- -
In the five years since the last Farm Bill was signed by then President
Donald Trump, a lot has changed. The country’s farmers have been
battered by a series of major storms, floods and droughts, and have
watched as growing seasons have become longer, hotter and wetter.
After all the extreme weather, more farmers have come to accept that
climate change is, indeed, real, despite long-standing convictions to
the contrary. The American Farm Bureau Federation, the country’s most
powerful agribusiness lobbying group, had formally rejected the science
on climate change in its policy positions.
But even the Farm Bureau has pivoted, most notably in its embrace of
voluntary carbon trading markets, in which farmers are being paid to
sequester carbon in their soils.
“This is very different from the 2018 Farm Bill. Since then, Congress
has, by and large, admitted that climate change is real and it’s
affecting farmers,” Lavender said. “We’re in a vastly different
political moment.”
Some left-leaning and environmentally focused farm advocacy groups,
including NSAC and its members, say their biggest priority for the
legislation is to boost funding for the USDA’s existing conservation
programs. The two most popular are the Environmental Quality Incentives
Program and the Conservation Stewardship Program, both of which are
oversubscribed year after year. Advocates say these represent the best
opportunity for farmers to control greenhouse gas emissions...
- -
The “Food Not Feed Summit” in Washington, where Booker spoke, was
organized by Farm Action, a relatively new advocacy group that’s pushing
against increasing consolidation in the agriculture industry.
Taxpayer-funded subsidies for crop insurance, they argue, are one of the
biggest drivers of that concentration. From a climate perspective, they
say, these larger, consolidated players farm in more emissions-intensive
ways, but also make it increasingly difficult for smaller-scale growers
to thrive—or exist at all. ...
- -
The current farm bill expires at the end of September. Until then the
agriculture committees will wrangle over the legislation, with some
Republicans calling for broad cuts to a number of programs and vowing to
ensure that the “farm bill doesn’t become the climate bill,” while
Democrats push to make bolster farm programs that address the climate
crisis.
The usually bipartisan bill faces a potentially bumpy passage in a
divided Congress, with roughly 40 percent of House members new and
unfamiliar with farm policy.
Next week, though, small farm groups, led by NSAC, will head to the Hill
after their march on the mall to educate them.
“Farming has changed dramatically in the last 50 years and how we farm
in the next 50 years will change even more dramatically as farmers adapt
to extreme weather,” Faber said. “Booker is right. The moment is right.”
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/01032023/farm-bill-climate-change/
/[ Common Sense opinion ]/
*Overconsumption by the rich must be tackled, says acting UN
biodiversity chief*
Wealthy countries and businesses should act now to ensure success of
historic nature agreement signed at Cop15 in Montreal
Patrick Greenfield
@pgreenfielduk
Thu 2 Mar 2023
Governments and businesses must start implementing this decade’s deal to
halt the destruction of Earth’s ecosystems as soon as possible, the
acting UN biodiversity chief has said, urging rich nations to tackle
overconsumption of the planet’s resources...
- -
Some scientists believe humans are causing Earth’s sixth mass extinction
event due to overconsumption and pollution, driving the largest loss of
life since the time of the dinosaurs. Despite the scientific warnings,
governments have never met a UN biodiversity target they have set for
themselves and there is a major effort to make sure this decade is
different...
- -
“Businesses, particularly large and transnational businesses, need to
properly account for their impacts on biodiversity, as well as their
dependency on it. Having to disclose those impacts obviously puts
pressure internally and externally on them. It’s potentially really
important,” said Cooper, who added that rich countries and wealthy
people had a special responsibility to make the deal a success.
“Those of us in richer countries, especially richer people in rich
countries, need to be looking at their own footprint. On a planet with
limited resources, excess overconsumption by the rich in particular has
to be limited, otherwise it just doesn’t add up,” he said.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/mar/02/overconsumption-by-rich-must-be-tackled-says-acting-un-biodiversity-chief-aoe
/[The news archive - looking back at one of the biggest opinion
manipulation scams - many sources of this information taken down ]/
/*March 3, 2003*/
March 3, 2003: The Guardian reports on GOP operative Frank Luntz's
infamous memo urging Republicans to place renewed emphasis on alleged
"uncertainties" in climate science, to dull public support for efforts
to stem carbon pollution.
*Memo exposes Bush's new green strategy*
Oliver Burkeman in Washington
@oliverburkeman
Mon 3 Mar 2003
The US Republican party is changing tactics on the environment,
avoiding "frightening" phrases such as global warming, after a
confidential party memo warned that it is the domestic issue on
which George Bush is most vulnerable.
The memo, by the leading Republican consultant Frank Luntz, concedes
the party has "lost the environmental communications battle" and
urges its politicians to encourage the public in the view that there
is no scientific consensus on the dangers of greenhouse gases.
"The scientific debate is closing [against us] but not yet closed.
There is still a window of opportunity to challenge the science," Mr
Luntz writes in the memo, obtained by the Environmental Working
Group, a Washington-based campaigning organisation.
"Voters believe that there is no consensus about global warming
within the scientific community. Should the public come to believe
that the scientific issues are settled, their views about global
warming will change accordingly.
"Therefore, you need to continue to make the lack of scientific
certainty a primary issue in the debate."
The phrase "global warming" should be abandoned in favour of
"climate change", Mr Luntz says, and the party should describe its
policies as "conservationist" instead of "environmentalist", because
"most people" think environmentalists are "extremists" who indulge
in "some pretty bizarre behaviour... that turns off many voters".
Words such as "common sense" should be used, with pro-business
arguments avoided wherever possible.
The environment, the memo says, "is probably the single issue on
which Republicans in general - and President Bush in particular -
are most vulnerable".
A Republican source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said party
strategists agreed with Mr Luntz's conclusion that "many Americans
believe Republicans do not care about the environment".
The popular image is that they are "in the pockets of corporate fat
cats who rub their hands together and chuckle manically [sic] as
they plot to pollute America for fun and profit", Mr Luntz adds.
The phrase "global warming" appeared frequently in President Bush's
speeches in 2001, but decreased to almost nothing during 2002, when
the memo was produced.
Environmentalists have accused the party and oil companies of
helping to promulgate the view that serious doubt remains about the
effects of global warming.
Last week, a panel of experts appointed at the Bush administration's
request to analyse the president's climate change strategy found
that it lacked "vision, executable goals, clear timetables and
criteria for measuring progress".
"Rather than focusing on the things we don't know, it's almost as if
parts of the plan were written by people who are totally unfamiliar
with where ecosystems science is coming from," panel member William
Schlesinger told the Guardian.
Mr Luntz urges Republicans to "emphasise the importance of 'acting
only with all the facts in hand'", in line with the White House
position that mandatory restrictions on emissions, as required by
the Kyoto protocol, should not be countenanced until further
research is undertaken.
The memo singles out as a major strategic failure the incoming Bush
administration's response to Bill Clinton's last-minute executive
order reducing the permitted level of arsenic in drinking water from
50 parts per billion to 10 parts per billion.
The new administration put the plan on hold, prompting "the biggest
public relations misfire of President Bush's first year in office",
Mr Luntz writes. The perception was that Mr Bush "was actively
putting in more arsenic in the water".
"A compelling story, even if factually inaccurate, can be more
emotionally compelling than a dry recitation of the truth," Mr Luntz
notes in the memo.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2003/mar/04/usnews.climatechange
=======================================
*Mass media is lacking, many daily summariesdeliver global warming news
- a few are email delivered*
=========================================================
**Inside Climate News*
Newsletters
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or
once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines
deliver the full story, for free.
https://insideclimatenews.org/
---------------------------------------
**Climate Nexus* https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News summarizes the
most important climate and energy news of the day, delivering an
unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting. It also provides
original reporting and commentary on climate denial and pro-polluter
activity that would otherwise remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday
=================================
*Carbon Brief Daily https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up*
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon Brief
sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to thousands of
subscribers around the world. The email is a digest of the past 24 hours
of media coverage related to climate change and energy, as well as our
pick of the key studies published in the peer-reviewed journals.
more at https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief
==================================
*T*he Daily Climate *Subscribe https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate impacts,
solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better than coffee.
Other newsletters at https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender. This is a personal hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20230303/85a3ff78/attachment.htm>
- Previous message (by thread): [✔️] March 2, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | 3x El Nino, Bernie angry, PBS emerging disease, Steel smelt efficiency, TV network coverage of climate, R. Solnit, wind and whales misinformation battle
- Next message (by thread): [✔️] March 4, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | Salt Lake, CO2, Anxiety in children, Snyder Opinion, Rebecca Solnit, Not Too Late, Bernie support, CO2 record,
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the theClimate.Vote
mailing list