[✔️] May 24, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | Predicting human costs, modern slavery, Oreskes, book 'the Big Myth', Heat island deaths, Heat Islands, Dolly Parton sings. release, recall Al Gore - Inconvenianet truth.

[Richard Pauli]

/*May*//*24, 2023*/

/[ Significant studies will lead to predictions  ]/
Published: 22 May 2023
*Quantifying the human cost of global warming*
Timothy M. Lenton, Chi Xu, Jesse F. Abrams, Ashish Ghadiali, Sina 
Loriani, Boris Sakschewski, Caroline Zimm, Kristie L. Ebi, Robert R. 
Dunn, Jens-Christian Svenning & Marten Scheffer
Nature Sustainability (2023)Cite this article
635 Altmetric
*Abstract*

    The costs of climate change are often estimated in monetary terms,
    but this raises ethical issues. Here we express them in terms of
    numbers of people left outside the ‘human climate niche’—defined as
    the historically highly conserved distribution of relative human
    population density with respect to mean annual temperature. We show
    that climate change has already put ~9% of people (>600 million)
    outside this niche. By end-of-century (2080–2100), current policies
    leading to around 2.7 °C global warming could leave one-third
    (22–39%) of people outside the niche. Reducing global warming from
    2.7 to 1.5 °C results in a ~5-fold decrease in the population
    exposed to unprecedented heat (mean annual temperature ≥29 °C). The
    lifetime emissions of ~3.5 global average citizens today (or ~1.2
    average US citizens) expose one future person to unprecedented heat
    by end-of-century. That person comes from a place where emissions
    today are around half of the global average. These results highlight
    the need for more decisive policy action to limit the human costs
    and inequities of climate change.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-023-01132-6



/[ Correlation, not causation -  cultural, scientific, equity and the 
morality of trade ]/
*How Modern Slavery Impacts the Environment with Kevin Bales*
May/5/2023
There are 45 million enslaved people in the world today. The links 
between slavery, conflict, environmental destruction, economics and 
consumption began to strengthen and evolve in the 20th century. The 
availability of people who might be enslaved dramatically increased in 
line with population growth. According to Kevin Bales, professor of 
contemporary slavery and research director of the Rights Lab at the 
University of Nottingham, the large and negative environmental impact of 
modern slavery is just now coming to light.

Slave-based activities, like brick making and deforestation, are 
estimated to generate 2.54 billion tonnes of CO2 per year – greater than 
the individual emissions of all the world's nations except China and the 
U.S. Globally, slaves are forced to do work that is highly destructive 
to the environment. This work feeds directly into global consumption in 
foodstuffs, in minerals – both precious and for electronics – 
construction materials, clothing, and foodstuffs. Most of this work is 
unregulated leading to extensive poisoning of watersheds, the 
clear-cutting of forests, and enormous and unregulated emissions of 
carcinogenic gases as well as CO2. Political corruption supports this 
slave-based environmental destruction and its human damage.
                        [ or see on YouTube 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yW8nZG_eePs  ]
Kevin Bales, CMG, FRSA is Professor of Contemporary Slavery and Research 
Director of the Rights Lab, University of Nottingham. He co-founded the 
American NGO Free the Slaves. His 1999 book Disposable People: New 
Slavery in the Global Economy has been published in twelve languages. 
Desmond Tutu called it "a well researched, scholarly and deeply 
disturbing expose of modern slavery." The film based on Disposable 
People, which he co-wrote, won the Peabody Award and two Emmys. The 
Association of British Universities named his work one of "100 
World-Changing Discoveries." In 2007 he published Ending Slavery: How We 
Free Today's Slaves (Grawemeyer Award). In 2009, with Ron Soodalter, he 
published The Slave Next Door: Modern Slavery in the United States. In 
2016 his research institute was awarded the Queens Anniversary Prize, 
and he published Blood and Earth: Modern Slavery, Ecocide, and the 
Secret to Saving the World. Check out his TEDTalk. Recorded on 
3/14/2023. (#38614)
Sponsor(s): UC Berkeley Graduate Lectures
https://www.uctv.tv/shows/38614



/[ WBUR interviews Naomi Oreskes ]/
*The Big Myth' explores the belief that free markets are a fundamental 
American right*
March 03, 2023
Scott TongEmiko Tamagawa
Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway know a provocative subject. Their 
best-selling 2010 book "Merchants of Doubt" explored how four physicists 
laid the groundwork for climate change denial by arguing against 
government regulation and in favor of the free market.

The idea of a pure, unadulterated free market and how it came to be is 
the story in their new book, "The Big Myth: How American Business Taught 
Us to Loathe Government and Love the Free Market." The book acknowledges 
a useful nature of market forces to set prices and reward work. The myth 
referenced in the title is market fundamentalism, says Oreskes, a 
science historian at Harvard Univerisity.

“What we're trying to show in the book is how an ideal of the free 
market in the singular was put forward by business interests in the 
United States,” Oreskes says, “as a way to fight back against regulation 
of the workplace, to fight back against people who are trying to limit 
child labor and to persuade the American people that government 
regulation of the marketplace was not in our interest.”

Market fundamentalism plays out in Republican opposition to action on 
climate change and regulation of drugs like opioids, Oreskes says, as 
well as tax cuts for the rich and income inequality. The latter come 
from the idea that letting the rich do business will benefit everyone, 
but evidence shows that’s not true.

“Not too many people today would stand up in public and say greed is 
good. But people do continue to say that self-interest is good, that 
self-interest drives entrepreneurs, it drives people to invent things 
and be creative,” she says. “And that's true up to a point. But we also 
know that self-interest has to be tempered against the common good, and 
that when we have inadequate regulation of markets and workplaces, 
people get hurt.”
https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2023/02/28/big-myth-book-business

- -

/[ promoting the Big Myth ]/
*Book excerpt: 'The Big Myth: How American Business Taught Us to Loathe 
Government and Love the Free Market'*
By Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway
Over the past several decades, American business has manufactured a myth 
that has held us in its grip: the idea of “the magic of the marketplace.”

Some people call it market absolutism or market essentialism. In the 
1990s, George Soros popularized the name we find most apt: market 
fundamentalism. It’s a quasi-religious belief that the best way to 
address our needs—whether economic or otherwise—is to let markets do 
their thing, and not rely on government. Market fundamentalists treat 
“The Market” as a proper noun: something unique and unto itself, that 
has agency and even wisdom, that functions best when left unfettered and 
unregulated, undisturbed and unperturbed. Government, according to the 
myth, cannot improve the functioning of markets; it can only interfere. 
Governments therefore need to stay out of the way, lest they “distort” 
the market and prevent it from doing its “magic.” In the late twentieth 
century, market fundamentalism was cloaked in the seemingly ancient 
raiment of received wisdom.

Classical liberal economists—including Adam Smith—recognized that 
government served essential functions, including building infrastructure 
for everyone’s benefit, and regulating banks, which left to their own 
devices could destroy an economy. They also recognized that taxation was 
required to enable governments to perform those functions. But in the 
early twentieth century, a group of self-styled “neo-liberals” shifted 
economic and political thinking radically. They argued that any 
government action in the marketplace, even well intentioned, compromised 
the freedom of individuals to do as they pleased—and therefore put us on 
the road to totalitarianism. Political and economic freedom were 
“indivisible,” they insisted: any compromise to the latter was a threat 
to the former—any compromise at all, even to address obvious ills like 
child labor or workplace injury. Why did we ever come to accept a 
worldview so impervious to facts? A worldview Smith himself, often 
thought of as the father of free-market capitalism, would have rejected?

Between us we have been to all fifty states and lived in twelve, 
including wilderness Alaska and a dying mill town in northern New 
Hampshire. On our travels, we have found that market fundamentalism is 
widespread in “blue” and “red” states alike, and that some version of it 
underlies most climate change skepticism. Many people seem to take 
Ronald Reagan’s view that “the government” is the problem, as it stands 
ready to steal both their money and their freedom. When asked why they 
hold these views—why they are skeptical that climate change is man-made 
or that government can do anything about it—they often point to articles 
they read in Fortune, Forbes, or the Wall Street Journal. As one of our 
students put it, the most common answer, whether in Massachusetts or 
Montana, was “markets, markets, markets.” Thus emerged the question that 
we have spent the past decade studying: How did so many Americans come 
to have so much faith in markets and so little faith in government?

Market fundamentalism is not just the belief that free markets are the 
best means to run an economic system but also the belief that they are 
the only means that will not ultimately destroy our other freedoms. It 
is the belief in the primacy of economic freedom not just to generate 
wealth but as a bulwark of political freedom. And it is the belief that 
markets exist outside of politics and culture, so that it can be logical 
to speak of leaving them “alone.”

As George Soros has summarized, “the doctrine of laissez-faire 
capitalism holds that the common good is best served by the uninhibited 
pursuit of self-interest.” That’s the core argument Adam Smith made in 
1776 and contented capitalists have accepted ever since. Market 
fundamentalists, however, depart from Smith by insisting there is no 
“common good,” merely the sum of all the individual private goods. For 
this reason, they reject government’s claims to represent “the people”: 
there are only individuals who represent themselves, and they do this 
most effectively not through their governments, even democratically 
elected ones, but through free choices in free markets. Milton Friedman, 
America’s most famous market fundamentalist, went so far as to argue 
that voting was not democratic, because it could too easily be distorted 
by special interests and because in any case most voters were ignorant. 
But rather than consider how special interests might be mitigated or how 
voters could be better informed, he maintained that true freedom was not 
expressed in the voting booth. “The economic market provides a greater 
degree of freedom than the political market,” Friedman said in South 
Africa in 1976, as he encouraged the citizens of that country not to 
fuss over apartheid, but to preserve and expand their market-based economy.

Friedman’s argument works when we are talking about the freedom to buy, 
say, shoes of any type. But it fails when we consider the larger 
picture, including deceptive advertising, aggressive and misleading 
public relations campaigns, and what economists call “external costs”: 
costs that are invisible to or misunderstood by the shoe buyers, or that 
accrue to people who didn’t buy those shoes at all. Pollution is an 
external cost. What happens when the shoe manufacturer dumps toxic 
chemicals behind the plant and hides that fact from its workers, 
investors, and customers? Friedman downplayed the problem by giving it 
the friendly label of “neighborhood effects,” and claimed that any 
remedy would almost always be worse than the disease, because of the 
loss of freedoms or compromises to property rights typically associated 
with government regulations. In some cases, he may have been right. 
Regulations do compromise someone’s freedom in order to protect the 
freedom (and welfare) of others. When it comes to pollution, the 
“freedom” of factories to dump toxic wastes has been rightly rejected. 
When it comes to climate change, the “freedom” of corporations to sell 
oil, gas, and coal jeopardizes the rest of us. This creates a 
fundamental dilemma for the fundamentalists. But rather than rethink 
their arguments, market fundamentalists protect their worldview by 
denying that climate change is real or asserting that somehow “The 
Market” will fix it, despite all evidence to the contrary.

Like all good myths, the myth of the magic of the marketplace has a 
kernel of truth. As any economist could tell you, markets can 
efficiently allocate resources. Markets are good for getting productive 
uses out of the inputs that create wealth. They are also good for 
amassing information. Markets reveal a lot about what people want, how 
far they are willing to go to get it, and how much they are willing to 
pay for it. If efficiency were our only goal, then market fundamentalism 
might make sense. But efficiency is a tool, not an end.

This raises a profound question: Is capitalism itself to blame for 
climate change, as critics such as Naomi Klein and Andreas Malm argue? 
Or the opioid crisis? Or the lack of affordable housing? We argue no: 
the culprit is how we think about capitalism, and how it operates. The 
culprit is market fundamentalist ideology, which denies capitalism’s 
failures and refuses to endorse the best tool we have to address those 
failures, which is democratic government. It also fails to acknowledge 
the role of other tools available to us, like corporate governance. 
Market fundamentalism touts the benefits and virtues of deregulation and 
the value of economic freedom to the near eclipse of other concerns.

A group of individuals and institutions worked to make people believe 
they had to choose between “The Market” and “The State,” between 
unconstrained capitalism and Soviet-style centralized planning. But 
there are all kinds of alternatives, and one important one is to see 
governments and markets as complementary, not as opposing camps. Adam 
Smith and other foundational thinkers understood their field of study as 
one integrated discipline—political economy—yet today we (wrongly) treat 
politics and economics as separate spheres.

Market fundamentalism perpetuates a mistake in categories, conflating 
capitalism, which is an economic system, with democracy, which is a 
political system. We think that the properly framed choice is not 
capitalism versus tyranny; it is democracy versus tyranny, and 
well-regulated capitalism versus poorly regulated capitalism. Whether 
its advocates were cynical or sincere, market fundamentalism has hobbled 
our response to a host of problems that face us today, threatening our 
wellbeing and even the prosperity that markets are designed to deliver. 
The rhetoric of the magic of the marketplace made meaningful 
alternatives disappear.

This myth powers the enormous wealth gap between the top one percent and 
the rest of us. It has been used to justify a sharp decline in the 
safety and stability of the work most of us do to get by. It has blocked 
the efforts we must take to reverse the heating of our planet and 
protect the very existence of the world as we know it. The big myth’s 
expiration date is long past due. Our futures depend on rejecting it.

 From "The Big Myth: How American Business Taught Us to Loathe 
Government and Love the Free Market" by Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway, 
out now from Bloomsbury Publishing. Copyright © 2023 by Naomi Oreskes & 
Erik M. Conway. All rights reserved.
https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2023/02/28/big-myth-book-business


/[ it's warfare by any other name.   Once a group is defined, it gets 
certified - from ClimateNexus ]/
*Climate Change and 'Heat Islands' Are Killing People Of Color:* Extreme 
heat fueled by climate change kills more people in the US than any other 
weather-related event each year, and those who are at the greatest risk 
of dying are Black and brown people. People who die from extreme heat 
are typically older, have underlying health conditions, and don’t have 
access to air conditioning or any greenspace in their neighborhood. A 
2021 study of the 175 largest urban areas in the US found that people of 
color were more likely than white people to live on what are called 
“heat islands,” where the buildings, roofs, roads, sidewalks, and 
parking lots absorb and radiate the sun’s heat, while not providing any 
trees, parks, ponds, or lakes that naturally cool the surrounding 
landscape. Black people in New York City are twice as likely to die from 
heat than their white counterparts, as there’s a 35-degree difference on 
a hot day in the South Bronx compared to the Upper West Side. (The Root, 
Derrick Z. Jackson column)
https://newsletter.climatenexus.org/heatislands

- -

/[ Anyone spending more than a few days in a city will be able to 
certify this -- feeling different heat on their skin according to 
neighborhood  ]/
*How Climate Change and 'Heat Islands' are Killing Black People*
The nation’s history of redlining and other forms of housing 
discrimination means that climate change and the Black community are on 
a deadly collision course.
By Derrick Z. Jackson
May 22, 2023
If the late Marvin Gaye could add climate change to his ecological 
masterpiece “Mercy, Mercy Me,” he might ask: Where did all the cool 
nights go? Heatwaves in the ‘hood, no shade from the sky, no AC to keep 
grandma from dying.

Why might the late Motown crooner sing that? Because on Wednesday, the 
World Meteorological Organization announced that Earth will almost 
assuredly see its warmest average temperature yet over the next five 
years. To that end, there is a better-than-even chance that one of those 
next five years will see the planet temporarily breach limits set by the 
Paris climate accords to avoid the catastrophic effects of climate 
change. The Paris Agreement recommended that nations reduce greenhouse 
gas emissions to hold Earth’s warming to 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 
degrees Celsius) over preindustrial levels.
The heat is already on this year, with the onset of summer still a month 
away. Las Vegas had a record day of 93 degrees in April. Seattle and 
Portland, which broke summer records two years ago with 108 and 116 
degrees respectively, set new May records in the 90s. Globally, new 
spring records up to 114 degrees Fahrenheit were set across Portugal, 
Spain, Morocco Algeria, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Thailand.

Temperatures like that mean death. Extreme heat kills more people in the 
United States annually than any other weather-related event, such as 
hurricanes, floods, or tornadoes. In North America, the most recent 
searing evidence of that was the more than 1,400 deaths under the “heat 
dome” in 2021 that suffocated Oregon, Washington state, and western Canada.

Because of the demographics of that part of North America, most of the 
victims of that historic heatwave happened to be white. But close 
attention to the key factors associated with the deaths in Vancouver, 
British Columbia, Portland and Seattle, reveals threads all too common 
with the day-in, day-out conditions of many African Americans. 
Typically, the victim was a socially and materially deprived elder, had 
underlying health conditions, and possessed no air conditioning in 
neighborhoods lacking the cooling effects of greenspace.
Black people share those conditions to the level of being 
disproportionately sealed under the dome of a hotter world, with dire 
consequences likely if the nation does not fight climate change. 
According to a 2021 study of the nation’s 175 largest urban areas, 
people of color in the U.S. were more likely than white people to live 
on what are called “heat islands.” This is the modern term for the 
“concrete jungle,” referring to parts of cities where the concentration 
of buildings, roofs, roads, sidewalks, and parking lots relentlessly 
absorb and radiate the sun’s heat. Such neighborhoods are often marked 
by a lack of trees, parks and ponds, creeks, and lakes that naturally 
cool and moisten the landscape.

Black people, according to the study of 175 cities, have the highest 
surface urban heat island exposure of any racial or ethnic group, with 
Hispanics coming in second. It is not an issue of poverty. The nation’s 
history of redlining and many other forms of housing discrimination in 
neighborhoods that white interests see as cooler—figuratively, and now, 
literally—have resulted in Black people being marooned on heat islands 
regardless of their income.

No one yet knows what that means in actual number of deaths. The federal 
government says about 700 people die annually in the U.S. from 
heat-related illnesses, but a 2020 study estimated that number is much 
closer to approximately 5,600 deaths a year. A Los Angeles Times 
analysis calculated that California alone suffered 3,900 heat-related 
deaths from 2010-2019.

What we do know is that Black people are being disproportionately 
affected. In New York City, where the health department says 370 people 
die annually from heat-related causes, Black people are twice as likely 
to die from heat stress than their white counterparts. A 2021 New York 
Times story found a 35-degree difference on a blazing day in August 
between the 119-degree sidewalk temperature on a tree-less section of 
the South Bronx and the 84-degree sidewalk temperature on the 
thickly-treed Upper West Side near the urban forest of Central Park.

In California, racial disparities have been bubbling up like lava from a 
volcano. From 2005 to 2015, the rate of emergency room visits for 
heat-related illnesses soared by 67 percent for African Americans, 63 
percent for Latinos, and 53 percent for Asian Americans. It should be 
noted that the rate of Black emergency room visitors was more than twice 
the 27 percent increase for white Californians.

Technically, these disparities in heat risk are not new. In the 1995 
Chicago heatwave that killed more than 700 people, Black residents had 
an age-adjusted death rate that was 50 percent higher than white 
residents. The highest risk was for Black seniors, who had a death rate 
nearly double that of white seniors.

Worse, it’s not like Black people don’t know they are in the crosshairs 
of a sizzling climate. A 2020 poll commissioned by the Harlem-based WE 
ACT for Environmental Justice and the Environmental Defense Fund found 
that 52 percent of Black respondents were “very concerned” about 
heatwaves, nearly double the 28 percent of white respondents who were 
very concerned.

The question is this: Will the part of our nation that enjoys the 
cooling cross breeze under an oak canopy ever sweat enough to care about 
climate change? Or even hear the S.O.S. from our blistering heat 
islands? Mercy, mercy me. Things ain’t what they used to be. What about 
this overheated land? What more abuse from man can she stand?
/Derrick Z. Jackson is a former Boston Globe columnist and a finalist 
for the Pulitzer Prize in commentary./
https://www.theroot.com/the-heat-is-on-1850462642



/[ Some hot music - https://youtu.be/0QJXsmDBS8k  (I recall the original 
lyrics: "pants on fire") ] /
*Dolly Parton - World On Fire (From The 58th ACM Awards)*
Dolly Parton official “World On Fire” Lyrics:

    Liar, liar the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down
    Fire, fire burning higher
    Still got time to turn it all around

    Now I ain't one for speaking out much
    But that don’t mean I don’t stay in touch
    Everybody’s trippin’ over this or that
    What we gonna do when we all fall flat

    Liar, liar the world’s on fire
    What we gonna do when it all burns down

    I don’t know what to think about us
    When did we lose in God we trust
    God Almighty, what we gonna do
    If God ain’t listenin’ and we’re deaf too

    Liar, liar the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down
    Fire, fire burning higher
    Still got time to turn it all around

    Don’t get me started on politics
    Now how are we to live in a world like this
    Greedy politicians, present and past
    They wouldn’t know the truth if it bit ‘em in the ass

    Now tell me what is truth
    Have we all lost sight
    Of common decency
    Of the wrong and right
    How do we heal this great divide
    Do we care enough to try

    Liar, liar the world’s on fire
    What we gonna do when it all burns down

    Billy got a gun, Joey got a knife
    Janey got a sign to carry in the fight
    Marching in the streets with sticks and stones
    Don’t you ever believe words don’t break bones

    Oh, can we rise above
    Can’t we show some love
    Do we just give up
    Or make a change

    We know all too well
    We’ve all been through hell
    Time to break the spell
    In heaven’s name

    Liar, liar the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down
    Fire, fire burning higher
    Still got time to turn it all around

    Liar, liar the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down
    Fire, fire burning higher
    Still got time to turn it all around

    (Liar, liar, the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down
    Liar, liar, the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down)
    Show some love
    (Liar, liar, the world’s on fire,
    Still got time to turn it all around)
    Let’s rise above
    (Liar, liar, the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down)
    Let’s make a stand
    (Liar, liar, the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down)
    Let’s lend a hand
    (Liar, liar, the world’s on fire
    Still got time to turn it all around)
    Let’s heal the hurt
    (Liar, Liar, the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down)
    Let kindness work
    (Liar, liar, the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down)
    Let’s be a friend
    (Liar, liar, the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down)
    Let hatred end
    (Liar, liar, the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do)
    Liar, liar, the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down
    Liar, liar, the world’s on fire
    Whatcha gonna do when it all burns down

Music video by Dolly Parton performing World On Fire (From The 58th ACM 
Awards) (From The 58th ACM Awards). © 2023 Butterfly Records, LLC under 
exclusive license to Big Machine Label Group, LLC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QJXsmDBS8k

- -
/[  Interviewed on the Today show -- video ]/
*Dolly Parton opens up about the shift in tone in her new music*
TODAY <https://www.youtube.com/@TODAY>
190,710 views  May 15, 2023  #dollywood #dollyparton #music
Music superstar Dolly Parton opens up about her new rock anthem, "World 
On Fire" in which she speaks out against the politics of today and talks 
about the major shift in tone and sound of her new album of covers. She 
also walks through Dollywood with NBC’s Jacob Soboroff and shows off her 
new roller coaster — and shares why she won’t ride it!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oi9ib0aLYcA

D
/[The news archive - looking back at an important show. ]/
/*May 24, 2006*/
May 24, 2006: "An Inconvenient Truth" is released in the United States.
Box Office Guru.com's Gitesh Pandya notes:

    "Setting the limited release box office on fire was the global
    warming documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth' which opened in only
    four theaters but grossed a hefty $367,311. That gave the Al Gore
    pic a stunning average of $91,827 per location over four days.
    Distributed by Paramount Vantage, the new incarnation of Paramount
    Classics, Truth collected $281,330 over the Friday-to-Sunday portion
    averaging a scorching $70,332. Total since Wednesday stands at
    $490,860. Opening this weekend on multiple screens at a pair of
    theaters in both New York and Los Angeles, Truth will add about 60
    more playdates on Friday and expand throughout June hoping to become
    the dominant doc of the summer."

(Al Gore and director Davis Guggenheim would appear on the June 2, 2006 
edition of "EcoTalk" on Air America to discuss the film.)
http://youtu.be/8ZUoYGAI5i0
http://www.boxofficeguru.com/052906.htm
http://blogsofbainbridge.typepad.com/ecotalkblog/2006/06/al_gore_about_a.html
http://blogsofbainbridge.typepad.com/ecotalkblog/2006/06/davis_guggenhei.html

=======================================
*Mass media is lacking, many daily summariesdeliver global warming news 
- a few are email delivered*

=========================================================
**Inside Climate News*
Newsletters
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or 
once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines 
deliver the full story, for free.
https://insideclimatenews.org/
---------------------------------------
**Climate Nexus* https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News summarizes the 
most important climate and energy news of the day, delivering an 
unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting. It also provides 
original reporting and commentary on climate denial and pro-polluter 
activity that would otherwise remain largely unexposed.    5 weekday
=================================
*Carbon Brief Daily https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up*
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon Brief 
sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to thousands of 
subscribers around the world. The email is a digest of the past 24 hours 
of media coverage related to climate change and energy, as well as our 
pick of the key studies published in the peer-reviewed journals.
more at https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief
==================================
*T*he Daily Climate *Subscribe https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate impacts, 
solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better than coffee.
Other newsletters  at https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/ 

/ to explore the archive 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/


/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe 
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request> 
to news digest./

Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only.  It does not carry 
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers.  A 
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and 
sender. This is a personal hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial 
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote 
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, 
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at 
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for 
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct 
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List 
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to 
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20230524/d53b916c/attachment.htm>