[✔️] November 28, 2023- Global Warming News Digest |
Richard Pauli
Richard at CredoandScreed.com
Tue Nov 28 13:36:40 EST 2023
- Previous message (by thread): [✔️] November 27, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | Hansen speaks, Hansen's paper, Solar panels protect water, Wildfires, 2014
- Next message (by thread): [✔️] November 29, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | COP28 subterfuge, McKibben opinion, Ukraine war weather, wrestle a tornado, Carbon Trauma, The Body Keeps the Score, mental health,
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
/*November *//*28, 2023*/
/[ Thoughtful, wise, informative - video 15 min - schooling refiners ]/
*How can we stop burning fossil fuels if we still need everything else
they make?*
Just Have a Think
Nov 26, 2023
Petroleum-based products like pharmaceuticals, electronics, fertilizers,
plastics and a host of other crucial modern world commodities are all
impossible to make without first producing hundreds of millions of
tonnes of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel. It's just the way the process
works. At least that's what the fossil fuel industry would like you to
believe. Except, that is NOT TRUE. An independent petroleum industry
consultant explains how it REALLY works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYWLpdGgJe4
- -
[ Get technical info ]
*Spitfire Research Inc.*
Process development consulting for a decarbonized future
30 yrs experience helping people take chemical process ideas from the
lab to commercial reality.
Helping you make strategic decisions about commercialization and scale-up.
If you’re a technology developer with an exciting new process working in
the lab, an investor wondering whether a start-up’s claims are valid, or
a business leader trying to navigate toward a decarbonized future,
Spitfire Research can help.
https://spitfireresearch.com/
- -
/[ IEA Reports The Oil and Gas Industry in Net Zero Transitions ]/
*Oil and gas industry faces moment of truth – and opportunity to adapt –
as clean energy transitions advance*
Producers must choose between contributing to a deepening climate crisis
or becoming part of the solution by embracing the shift to clean energy,
IEA special report says
Oil and gas producers face pivotal choices about their role in the
global energy system amid a worsening climate crisis fuelled in large
part by their core products, according to a major new special report
from the IEA that shows how the industry can take a more responsible
approach and contribute positively to the new energy economy.
The Oil and Gas Industry in Net Zero Transitions analyses the
implications and opportunities for the industry that would arise from
stronger international efforts to reach energy and climate targets.
Released ahead of the COP28 climate summit in Dubai, the special report
sets out what the global oil and gas sector would need to do to align
its operations with the goals of the Paris Agreement.
Even under today’s policy settings, global demand for both oil and gas
is set to peak by 2030, according to the latest IEA projections.
Stronger action to tackle climate change would mean clear declines in
demand for both fuels. If governments deliver in full on their national
energy and climate pledges, demand would fall 45% below today's level by
2050. In a pathway to reaching net zero emissions by mid-century, which
is necessary to keep the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C
within reach, oil and gas use would decline by more than 75% by 2050.
Yet the oil and gas sector – which provides more than half of global
energy supply and employs nearly 12 million workers worldwide – has been
a marginal force at best in transitioning to a clean energy system,
according to the report. Oil and gas companies currently account for
just 1% of clean energy investment globally – and 60% of that comes from
just four companies.
“The oil and gas industry is facing a moment of truth at COP28 in Dubai.
With the world suffering the impacts of a worsening climate crisis,
continuing with business as usual is neither socially nor
environmentally responsible,” said IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol.
“Oil and gas producers around the world need to make profound decisions
about their future place in the global energy sector. The industry needs
to commit to genuinely helping the world meet its energy needs and
climate goals – which means letting go of the illusion that implausibly
large amounts of carbon capture are the solution. This special report
shows a fair and feasible way forward in which oil and gas companies
take a real stake in the clean energy economy while helping the world
avoid the most severe impacts of climate change.”
The global oil and gas industry encompasses a large and diverse range of
players – from small, specialised operators to huge national oil
companies. Attention often focuses on the role of the private sector
majors, but they own less than 13% of global oil and gas production and
reserves.
Every company’s transition strategy can and should include a plan to
reduce emissions from its own operations, according to the report. The
production, transport and processing of oil and gas results in nearly
15% of global energy-related greenhouse emissions – equal to all
energy-related greenhouse gas emissions from the United States. As
things stand, companies with targets to reduce their own emissions
account for less than half of global oil and gas output.
To align with a 1.5 °C scenario, the industry’s own emissions need to
decline by 60% by 2030. The emissions intensity of oil and gas producers
with the highest emissions is currently five-to-ten times above those
with the lowest, showing the vast potential for improvements.
Furthermore, strategies to reduce emissions from methane – which
accounts for half of the total emissions from oil and gas operations –
are well-known and can typically be pursued at low cost.
While oil and gas production is vastly lower in transitions to net zero
emissions, it will not disappear – even in a 1.5 °C scenario. Some
investment in oil and gas supply is needed to ensure the security of
energy supply and provide fuel for sectors in which emissions are harder
to abate, according to the report. Yet not every oil and gas company
will be able to maintain output – requiring consumers to send clear
signals on their direction and speed of travel so that producers can
make informed decisions on future spending.
The USD 800 billion currently invested in the oil and gas sector each
year is double what is required in 2030 on a pathway that limits warming
to 1.5 °C. In that scenario, declines in demand are sufficiently steep
that no new long-lead-time conventional oil and gas projects are needed.
Some existing oil and gas production would even need to be shut in.
In transitions to net zero, oil and gas is set to become a less
profitable and riskier business over time. The report’s analysis finds
that the current valuation of private oil and gas companies could fall
by 25% from USD 6 trillion today if all national energy and climate
goals are reached, and by up to 60% if the world gets on track to limit
global warming to 1.5 °C.
Opportunities lie ahead despite these challenges. The report finds that
the oil and gas sector is well placed to scale up some crucial
technologies for clean energy transitions. In fact, some 30% of the
energy consumed in 2050 in a decarbonised energy system comes from
technologies that could benefit from the industry’s skills and resources
– including hydrogen, carbon capture, offshore wind and liquid biofuels.
However, this would require a step-change in how the sector allocates
its financial resources. The oil and gas industry invested around USD 20
billion in clean energy in 2022, or roughly 2.5% of its total capital
spending. The report finds that producers looking to align with the aims
of the Paris Agreement would need to put 50% of their capital
expenditures towards clean energy projects by 2030, on top of the
investment required to reduce emissions from their own operations.
The report also notes that carbon capture, currently the linchpin of
many firms’ transition strategies, cannot be used to maintain the status
quo. If oil and natural gas consumption were to evolve as projected
under today’s policy settings, limiting the temperature rise to 1.5 °C
would require an entirely inconceivable 32 billion tonnes of carbon
captured for utilisation or storage by 2050, including 23 billion tonnes
via direct air capture. The amount of electricity needed to power these
technologies would be greater than the entire world’s electricity demand
today.
“The fossil fuel sector must make tough decisions now, and their choices
will have consequences for decades to come,” Dr Birol said. “Clean
energy progress will continue with or without oil and gas producers.
However, the journey to net zero emissions will be more costly, and
harder to navigate, if the sector is not on boar
https://www.iea.org/news/oil-and-gas-industry-faces-moment-of-truth-and-opportunity-to-adapt-as-clean-energy-transitions-advance
/[The news archive - Petroleum industry ]/
/*November 28, 2014 */
November 28, 2014:
• In the New York Times, Paul Krugman observes:
"Of course, polluters will defend their right to pollute, but why
can they count on Republican support? When and why did the
Republican Party become the party of pollution?
"For it wasn’t always thus. The Clean Air Act of 1970, the legal
basis for the Obama administration’s environmental actions, passed
the Senate on a bipartisan vote of 73 to 0, and was signed into law
by Richard Nixon. (I’ve heard veterans of the E.P.A. describe the
Nixon years as a golden age.) A major amendment of the law, which
among other things made possible the cap-and-trade system that
limits acid rain, was signed in 1990 by former President George H.W.
Bush.
"But that was then. Today’s Republican Party is putting a conspiracy
theorist who views climate science as a 'gigantic hoax' in charge of
the Senate’s environment committee. And this isn’t an isolated case.
Pollution has become a deeply divisive partisan issue.
"And the reason pollution has become partisan is that Republicans
have moved right. A generation ago, it turns out, environment wasn’t
a partisan issue: according to Pew Research, in 1992 an overwhelming
majority in both parties favored stricter laws and regulation. Since
then, Democratic views haven’t changed, but Republican support for
environmental protection has collapsed.
"So what explains this anti-environmental shift?
"You might be tempted simply to blame money in politics, and there’s
no question that gushers of cash from polluters fuel the
anti-environmental movement at all levels. But this doesn’t explain
why money from the most environmentally damaging industries, which
used to flow to both parties, now goes overwhelmingly in one
direction. Take, for example, coal mining. In the early 1990s,
according to the Center for Responsive Politics, the industry
favored Republicans by a modest margin, giving around 40 percent of
its money to Democrats. Today that number is just 5 percent.
Political spending by the oil and gas industry has followed a
similar trajectory. Again, what changed?
"One answer could be ideology. Textbook economics isn’t
anti-environment; it says that pollution should be limited, albeit
in market-friendly ways when possible. But the modern conservative
movement insists that government is always the problem, never the
solution, which creates the will to believe that environmental
problems are fake and environmental policy will tank the economy.
"My guess, however, is that ideology is only part of the story — or,
more accurately, it’s a symptom of the underlying cause of the
divide: rising inequality."
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/28/opinion/paul-krugman-pollution-and-politics.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
=== Other climate news sources ===========================================
**Inside Climate News*
Newsletters
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or
once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines
deliver the full story, for free.
https://insideclimatenews.org/
---------------------------------------
**Climate Nexus* https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News summarizes the
most important climate and energy news of the day, delivering an
unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting. It also provides
original reporting and commentary on climate denial and pro-polluter
activity that would otherwise remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday
=================================
*Carbon Brief Daily https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up*
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon Brief
sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to thousands of
subscribers around the world. The email is a digest of the past 24 hours
of media coverage related to climate change and energy, as well as our
pick of the key studies published in the peer-reviewed journals.
more at https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief
==================================
*T*he Daily Climate *Subscribe https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate impacts,
solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better than coffee.
Other newsletters at https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News
https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe
<mailto:subscribe at theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request>
to news digest./
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only -- and carries no images
or attachments which may originate from remote servers. Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender. This is a
personal hobby production curated by Richard Pauli
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for commercial
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.
To subscribe, email: contact at theclimate.vote
<mailto:contact at theclimate.vote> with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe,
subject: unsubscribe
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at
https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for
http://TheClimate.Vote <http://TheClimate.Vote/> delivering succinct
information for citizens and responsible governments of all levels. List
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously restricted to
this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/attachments/20231128/a747b9df/attachment.htm>
- Previous message (by thread): [✔️] November 27, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | Hansen speaks, Hansen's paper, Solar panels protect water, Wildfires, 2014
- Next message (by thread): [✔️] November 29, 2023- Global Warming News Digest | COP28 subterfuge, McKibben opinion, Ukraine war weather, wrestle a tornado, Carbon Trauma, The Body Keeps the Score, mental health,
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the theClimate.Vote
mailing list