<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <font size="+1"><i>April 21, 2017     </i></font><br>
    <br>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
        href="https://www.bloomberg.com/climate-changed">https://www.bloomberg.com/climate-changed</a></font><br>
    <b><a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/climate-changed">Bloomberg
        News today announces site devoted to climate change</a></b><br>
    <blockquote> <i>Offers easy to understand, visual explanations of
        climate change issues.  </i> <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-04-19/how-to-drive-the-world-0ff-a-cliff">https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-04-19/how-to-drive-the-world-0ff-a-cliff</a><br>
      Press release:  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bloomberg-climate-change_us_58f7e640e4b0cb086d7dd9e5">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bloomberg-climate-change_us_58f7e640e4b0cb086d7dd9e5</a><br>
      w-rising-temperatures-can-fry-the-economy-video<br>
      Be sure to see:  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2017-04-19/how-rising-temperatures-can-fry-the-economy-video">https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2017-04-19/how-rising-temperatures-can-fry-the-economy-video</a><br>
      <font size="-1">Climate Changed gives Bloomberg a leg up on The
        Wall Street Journal, arguably its chief competitor in the market
        for prestige journalism. The Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper's
        hard-line conservativism appears to have bled over from the
        opinion pages to the news section. A study published in 2015 by
        researchers at Rutgers University, the University of Michigan
        and the University of Oslo found that from 2006 to 2011, the
        Journal's news reporting rarely mentioned threats or effects of
        climate change, compared with the country's other leading
        broadsheet newspapers.</font><br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.thetelegram.com/news/local/2017/4/20/media-outlets-around-the-world-fascinated-by-ferryland-iceberg.html">http://www.thetelegram.com/news/local/2017/4/20/media-outlets-around-the-world-fascinated-by-ferryland-iceberg.html</a></font><br>
    <font color="#000099" size="+1"><b><a
href="http://www.thetelegram.com/news/local/2017/4/20/media-outlets-around-the-world-fascinated-by-ferryland-iceberg.html">Media
          outlets around the world fascinated by Ferryland iceberg</a></b></font><br>
    <blockquote> Image: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.thetelegram.com/content/dam/tc/the-telegram/images/2017/4/20/tel-a04-21042017-icebergmedia1.png">http://www.thetelegram.com/content/dam/tc/the-telegram/images/2017/4/20/tel-a04-21042017-icebergmedia1.png</a><br>
      Since it floated south into shallow water off the coast of
      Ferryland, the towering iceberg that had everyone clamouring for
      selfies last weekend has made its way around the world.<br>
      Media outlets across the globe seem to be fascinated with the
      gigantic berg, said to measure more than 150 feet tall.<br>
      "Iceberg in Canada taller than one that sank Titanic draws
      tourists to Newfoundland town," reads a headline in the U.K.'s
      Telegraph.<br>
      Over the past few days, <a
href="http://www.thetelegram.com/content/dam/tc/the-telegram/images/2017/4/20/tel-a04-21042017-icebergmedia1.png">photos
        of the now-famous Ferryland iceberg</a> have popped up on news
      sites such as Time, CNN, the New York Times and the BBC, as well
      as sites in Italy, Russia, India, Germany, Japan, El Salvador and
      New Zealand. Some have called it "Newfoundland's new tourist
      attraction."<br>
      Locals and regulars to the province know the berg is magnificent,
      but hardly part of a new attraction — these glacial masses are
      more than 10,000 years old, according to "Icebergs of Newfoundland
      and Labrador" author Stephen Bruneau, and up to 800 of them can
      make their way down to St. John's from western Greenland every
      spring.<br>
      ... the Province's <a href="http://icebergfinder.com/">Icebergfinder.com</a>
      website, which currently shows close to 40 icebergs in a range of
      sizes mapped between southern Labrador and the southern portion of
      the Avalon Peninsula. Pack ice — of which there's been plenty this
      year — protects the icebergs from being beaten by the waves and
      allows them to last longer, Bruneau states.<br>
      <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
          href="http://icebergfinder.com/">http://icebergfinder.com/</a></font><br>
      <b><a href="http://icebergfinder.com/">IcebergFinder.com 90% of
          them are underwater, Find the rest here</a></b><br>
      The icebergs you see on IcebergFinder.com come from two sources:
      visual sightings from our on-the-ground ambassadors and satellite
      detections from C-CORE using data from the European Space Agency
      (ESA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
      (NASA).<br>
      also: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/20/world/canada/iceberg-ferryland-newfoundland.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/20/world/canada/iceberg-ferryland-newfoundland.html</a><br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
        href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tiq_XcsikYE">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tiq_XcsikYE</a></font><br>
    <font color="#000099"><b><a
          href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tiq_XcsikYE">(video)
          Climate Change and Post-Truth Politics (UK)</a></b></font><br>
    <blockquote>2016 was a good and bad year for efforts to tackle
      climate change. The good news is that 120 parties have ratified
      the Paris Convention; the bad news is the emergence of post-truth
      politics and the associated denial of the evidence that climate
      change is a threat to our future. Leading environmentalist and
      Member of UK House of Lords John Krebs discusses the trends and
      their implications for global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas
      emissions. Recorded on 01/25/2017. Series: "Bren School of
      Environmental Science & Management" [4/2017] [Show ID:
      31961]   57 minutes.<br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
        href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MqTOEospfo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MqTOEospfo</a></font><br>
    <b><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MqTOEospfo">(video)
        Science in America - Neil deGrasse Tyson</a></b><i>     ( 4 mins
      - recent viral momentum</i>) <br>
    <blockquote>"Exercise in finding what is true"    We offer this 4min
      video on "Science in America", containing what may be the most
      important words Neil deGrasse Tyson has ever spoken.  Redglass
      Pictures is an award-winning production studio co-founded by Sarah
      Klein and Tom Mason and based in New York City. Their body of work
      is defined by a simple idea: that short, cinematic storytelling
      has the power to touch, teach, and change people. No matter the
      story or subject, their vision remains the same: give viewers
      something to care about – something that sticks with them long
      after the end frame.  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
        href="http://www.redglasspictures.com/">http://www.redglasspictures.com/</a><br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/20/magazine/why-the-menace-of-mosquitoes-will-only-get-worse.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/20/magazine/why-the-menace-of-mosquitoes-will-only-get-worse.html</a></font><br>
    <font color="#000099"><b><a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/20/magazine/why-the-menace-of-mosquitoes-will-only-get-worse.html">Why
          the Menace of Mosquitoes Will Only Get Worse</a></b></font><br>
    <blockquote>Climate change is altering the environment in ways that
      increase the potential for viruses like Zika.<br>
      West Nile was not new to the United States. It had been a minor
      summer threat since August 1999, when it made 17 people sick in
      New York City. That was the virus's first entry into the country,
      and it expanded through it thereafter. It landed in Dallas in
      2002, sickening 202 people and killing 13. ..<br>
      ... Warmer weather encourages food-borne organisms like salmonella
      to multiply more rapidly, and warmer seas foster the growth of
      bacteria like Vibrio that make oysters unsafe to eat. Spikes in
      heat and humidity have less visible effects, too, changing the
      numbers and distribution of the insect intermediaries that carry
      diseases to people...<br>
      ...in the year since that first Houston case, it has become clear
      that the United States is more vulnerable to Zika than anyone
      thought....The best defense against Aedes mosquitoes turns out to
      be not big municipal gestures but small individual actions:
      destroying their habitat by emptying the pools of water where they
      reproduce, and keeping them from eating by repairing windows
      screens and wearing bug repellent.<br>
      "Climate change is a threat multiplier," Katharine Hayhoe, one of
      those researchers and a director of Texas Tech's Climate Science
      Center, told me. "If there's one overarching theme that connects
      almost every way that climate change impacts us, it's that climate
      change takes a risk that already exists and enhances it. It's not
      inventing something new. It's taking something that we've already
      dealt with before, but giving it that extra oomph that makes it a
      bigger problem."<br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-04-20/natural-gas-moves-to-the-naughty-list">https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-04-20/natural-gas-moves-to-the-naughty-list</a></font><br>
    <font color="#000099"><b><a
href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-04-20/natural-gas-moves-to-the-naughty-list">Natural
          gas moves to the naughty list.</a></b></font><br>
    <blockquote>By Jennifer A Dlouhy, Mark Chediak Bloomberg
      Businessweek Apr 20<br>
      Power plants around the world are stepping up their use of gas as
      a fuel because it burns cleaner than coal—and in the U.S., at
      least, it's cheaper. Gas now supplies about a third of the
      country's power, up from just 17 percent a decade ago.<br>
      U.S. environmentalists have vowed to go after gas-fired power
      plants with the same vengeance they've used to force the
      retirements of hundreds of coal facilities. Even coal miners are
      warning their fossil fuel kin to beware. more…<br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170418-how-western-civilisation-could-collapse">http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170418-how-western-civilisation-could-collapse</a></font><br>
    <font size="+1"><b><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170418-how-western-civilisation-could-collapse">How
          Western Civilisation Could Collapse</a></b></font><br>
    Some possible precipitating factors are already in place. How the
    West reacts to them will determine the world's future.<br>
    <blockquote> By Rachel Nuwer    18 April 2017<br>
      The political economist Benjamin Friedman once compared modern
      Western society to a stable bicycle whose wheels are kept spinning
      by economic growth. Should that forward-propelling motion slow or
      cease, the pillars that define our society – democracy, individual
      liberties, social tolerance and more – would begin to teeter. Our
      world would become an increasingly ugly place, one defined by a
      scramble over limited resources and a rejection of anyone outside
      of our immediate group. Should we find no way to get the wheels
      back in motion, we'd eventually face total societal collapse...<br>
      Such collapses have occurred many times in human history, and no
      civilisation, no matter how seemingly great, is immune to the
      vulnerabilities that may lead a society to its end. Regardless of
      how well things are going in the present moment, the situation can
      always change....<br>
      It should come as no surprise that humanity is currently on an
      unsustainable and uncertain path – but just how close are we to
      reaching the point of no return?...<br>
       ...there are two factors that matter: ecological strain and
      economic stratification. The ecological category is the more
      widely understood and recognised path to potential doom,
      especially in terms of depletion of natural resources such as
      groundwater, soil, fisheries and forests – all of which could be
      worsened by climate change... imply because it is more expensive
      in the short term to solve the problem than it is to just keep
      acting as usual," says Jorgen Randers, a professor emeritus of
      climate strategy at the BI Norwegian Business School, and author
      of 2052: A Global Forecast for the Next Forty Years. "The climate
      problem will get worse and worse and worse because we won't be
      able to live up to what we've promised to do in the Paris
      Agreement and elsewhere."..<br>
      according to Joseph Tainter, a professor of environment and
      society at Utah State University and author of The Collapse of
      Complex Societies, one of the most important lessons from Rome's
      fall is that complexity has a cost. As stated in the laws of
      thermodynamics, it takes energy to maintain any system in a
      complex, ordered state – and human society is no exception. By the
      3rd Century, Rome was increasingly adding new things – an army
      double the size, a cavalry, subdivided provinces that each needed
      their own bureaucracies, courts and defences – just to maintain
      its status quo and keep from sliding backwards. Eventually, it
      could no longer afford to prop up those heightened complexities.
      It was fiscal weakness, not war, that did the Empire in....<br>
      Western civilisation is not a lost cause, however. Using reason
      and science to guide decisions, paired with extraordinary
      leadership and exceptional goodwill, human society can progress to
      higher and higher levels of well-being and development,<br>
      See also:   <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20161124-how-to-cope-with-the-end-of-the-world">http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20161124-how-to-cope-with-the-end-of-the-world</a><br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B008674K64/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1">https://www.amazon.com/dp/B008674K64/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1</a><br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.amazon.com/Collapse-Complex-Societies-Studies-Archaeology/dp/052138673X">https://www.amazon.com/Collapse-Complex-Societies-Studies-Archaeology/dp/052138673X</a><br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800914000615">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800914000615</a><br>
      Human and nature dynamics (HANDY): Modeling inequality and use of
      resources in the collapse or sustainability of societies<br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.climatepsychologyalliance.org/explorations/book-reviews/220-the-madhouse-effect-how-climate-change-denial-is-threatening-our-planet-destroying-our-politics-and-driving-us-crazy">http://www.climatepsychologyalliance.org/explorations/book-reviews/220-the-madhouse-effect-how-climate-change-denial-is-threatening-our-planet-destroying-our-politics-and-driving-us-crazy</a></font><br>
    <font color="#000099"><b><a
href="http://www.climatepsychologyalliance.org/explorations/book-reviews/220-the-madhouse-effect-how-climate-change-denial-is-threatening-our-planet-destroying-our-politics-and-driving-us-crazy">THE
          MADHOUSE EFFECT: HOW CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL IS THREATENING OUR
          PLANET, DESTROYING OUR POLITICS AND DRIVING US CRAZY     By
          Michael E. Mann and Tom Toles</a></b></font><br>
    Book Review by Adrian Tait<br>
    <blockquote>     Here perhaps is the book's hidden message to our
      hearts: climate scientists have to pay a price, explored by
      Hoggett and Randall, for holding the knowledge they do in a world
      that does not respond as it should. And those who speak out
      strongly are liable to pay a still heavier price. The cartoons, as
      well as oiling the wheels of communication, are part of a
      counter-attack against the denial industry. The narrative – on
      both the science and the denial game - is reasoned and well
      substantiated, but between every line we necessarily find
      ourselves at the interface of reason and passion. This is
      important reading for climate psychologists. The observable
      validity of the madhouse effect is enhanced rather than diminished
      by the passion. The word 'despicable' to describe oil-soaked
      politics is not used once, but is present throughout."<br>
          Despite the adverse political tide, there is one important
      source of hope which unites Mann and Toles with many others. This
      is the pace of transition to renewable energy and other 'clean'
      technologies. Many pundits have agreed that the combination of
      technological development and market forces will defeat efforts by
      vested interests to halt the decline in fossil fuel use. This
      transition is a necessary condition for any chance of containing
      the climate emergency. It may also be essential as a hopeful
      narrative to help sustain the climate movement. But as Kevin
      Anderson and others have repeatedly explained, technology alone
      cannot get us out of the mess we're in, given cumulative
      emissions. The Madhouse Effect covers important parts of the
      picture. After politics and technology comes the third dimension,
      psychology. The task of connecting that dimension with the others
      and of doing so with sufficient depth continues.  <i> Review by
        Adrian Tait</i><br>
    </blockquote>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"> <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/04/explaining_science_won_t_fix_information_illiteracy.html">http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/04/explaining_science_won_t_fix_information_illiteracy.html</a></font><br>
    <!--StartFragment-->
    <div class="esc-lead-article-title-wrapper" style="margin: 0px 32px
      1px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
      font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
      normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
      letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
      0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
      word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
      background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
      initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
      <h2 class="esc-lead-article-title" style="font-size: 18px;
        line-height: 21px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-weight:
        bold;"><a target="_blank" class="article
          usg-AFQjCNG94nOKkEk_TF3HzGi1Tge4gi3FaQ
          sig2-pnGuEf5vH7wwzVPvZXCS7A did-3554401135668623519"
href="http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/04/explaining_science_won_t_fix_information_illiteracy.html"
url="http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/04/explaining_science_won_t_fix_information_illiteracy.html"
          id="MAA4CkgDUABgAWoCdXM" ssid="snc"
ping="//news.google.com/news/url?sr=1&ct2=us%2F8_0_s_3_1_a&sa=t&usg=AFQjCNG94nOKkEk_TF3HzGi1Tge4gi3FaQ&cid=52779460996143&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slate.com%2Farticles%2Fhealth_and_science%2Fscience%2F2017%2F04%2Fexplaining_science_won_t_fix_information_illiteracy.html&ei=xAD5WIDcC4anhgGdxJ3QDg&sig2=pnGuEf5vH7wwzVPvZXCS7A&rt=HOMEPAGE&vm=STANDARD&bvm=grid&did=3554401135668623519&sid=en_us-snc&ssid=snc&st=1&at=dt0"
          style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204); text-decoration: none;"><span
            class="titletext" style="font-weight: bold;">Scientists,
            Stop Thinking Explaining Science Will Fix Things. It Won't.</span></a></h2>
    </div>
    <div class="esc-lead-article-source-wrapper" style="margin: 2px 32px
      2px 1px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
      font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
      normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
      letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
      0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
      word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
      background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
      initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
      <table class="al-attribution single-line-height" style="font-size:
        11px; line-height: 13px; font-family: arial, sans-serif; color:
        rgb(153, 153, 153);" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td class="al-attribution-cell source-cell"
              style="vertical-align: middle; padding-right: 0px;
              display: inline-block; white-space: normal;"><span
                class="al-attribution-source" style="white-space:
                nowrap;">Slate Magazine</span></td>
            <td class="al-attribution-cell timestamp-cell"
              style="vertical-align: middle; padding-right: 6px;
              display: inline-block; white-space: normal;"><span
                class="dash-separator" style="font-size: 11px;
                line-height: 13px; color: rgb(153, 153, 153);"> -<span
                  class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span
                class="al-attribution-timestamp" style="white-space:
                nowrap;">‎6 hours ago‎</span></td>
            <td class="al-attribution-cell sharebar-cell"
              style="vertical-align: middle; padding-right: 6px;
              display: inline-block;">
              <table id="52779460996143-sharebar" class="share-bar-table
                yesscript" style="font-size: 11px; line-height: 0;
                font-family: arial, sans-serif; table-layout: fixed;
                display: inline-block; margin-bottom: -4px; margin-left:
                8px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
                <tbody>
                  <tr>
                    <td class="share-bar-cell sharebox-cell"
                      style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 0px 1px;
                      cursor: pointer; width: 17px; height: 16px;"><br>
                    </td>
                    <td class="share-bar-cell" style="vertical-align:
                      middle; padding: 0px 1px; cursor: pointer; width:
                      17px; height: 16px;"><br>
                    </td>
                    <td class="share-bar-cell" style="vertical-align:
                      middle; padding: 0px 1px; cursor: pointer; width:
                      17px; height: 16px;"><br>
                    </td>
                    <td class="share-bar-cell" style="vertical-align:
                      middle; padding: 0px 1px; cursor: pointer; width:
                      17px; height: 16px;"><br>
                    </td>
                  </tr>
                </tbody>
              </table>
            </td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </div>
    <!--EndFragment-->
    <blockquote>     The theory many scientists seem to swear by is
      technically known as the deficit model, which states that people's
      opinions differ from scientific consensus because they lack
      scientific knowledge. In 2010, Dan Kahan, a Yale psychologist,
      essentially proved this theory wrong. He surveyed over 1,500
      Americans, classifying each person's "cultural worldview" on a
      scale that roughly correlates with politically liberal or
      conservative. He then assessed each person's scientific literacy
      with questions such as "True or False: Electrons are smaller than
      atoms." Finally, he asked them about climate change. If the
      deficit model were correct, Kahan reasoned, then people with
      increased scientific literacy, regardless of worldview, should
      agree with scientists that climate change poses a serious risk to
      humanity...<br>
            "If you repeat the myth, that's the part people remember
      even if you immediately debunk it," she says. A better approach,
      she suggests, is to reframe the issue. Don't just keep explaining
      why climate change is real—explain how climate change will hurt
      public health or the local economy. Communication that appeals to
      values, not just intellect, research shows, can be far more
      effective...<br>
           It's very logical... - and the deficit model perfectly
      explains how a scientist learns science. But the obstacles faced
      by science communicators are not epistemological but cultural. The
      skills required are not those of a university lecturer but a
      rhetorician...<br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    more from NYTimes Magazine <br>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/magazine/how-a-warming-planet-drives-human-migration.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/magazine/how-a-warming-planet-drives-human-migration.html</a></font><br>
    <b><a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/magazine/how-a-warming-planet-drives-human-migration.html">How
        a Warming Planet Drives Human Migration</a></b><br>
    Climate displacement is becoming one of the world's most powerful —
    and destabilizing — geopolitical forces.<br>
    <br>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/magazine/our-climate-future-is-actually-our-climate-present.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/magazine/our-climate-future-is-actually-our-climate-present.html</a></font><br>
    <b><a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/magazine/our-climate-future-is-actually-our-climate-present.html">Our
        Climate Future Is Actually Our Climate Present</a></b><br>
    How do we live with the fact that the world we knew is going and, in
    some cases, already gone?<br>
    <br>
    <font color="#666666" size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/magazine/when-rising-seas-transform-risk-into-certainty.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/magazine/when-rising-seas-transform-risk-into-certainty.html</a></font><br>
    <b><a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/magazine/when-rising-seas-transform-risk-into-certainty.html">When
        Rising Seas Transform Risk Into Certainty</a></b><br>
    Along parts of the East Coast, the entire system of insuring coastal
    property is beginning to break down.<br>
    <br>
    <!--StartFragment--><!--EndFragment--><font color="#666666"
      size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/climate-change-as-genocide-inaction-equals-annihilation_us_58f8c4a3e4b0cb086d7eaf4e">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/climate-change-as-genocide-inaction-equals-annihilation_us_58f8c4a3e4b0cb086d7eaf4e</a></font><br>
    <!--StartFragment-->
    <div class="esc-lead-article-title-wrapper" style="margin: 0px 32px
      1px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
      font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
      normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
      letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
      0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
      word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
      background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
      initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
      <h2 class="esc-lead-article-title" style="font-size: 18px;
        line-height: 21px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-weight:
        bold;"><a target="_blank" class="article
          usg-AFQjCNGWY9gKu1eQbpLdHYNVhO_O8kn2wg
          sig2-cviMIijO9ASgP4cGXTtcvg did-1426953553900681378"
href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/climate-change-as-genocide-inaction-equals-annihilation_us_58f8c4a3e4b0cb086d7eaf4e"
url="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/climate-change-as-genocide-inaction-equals-annihilation_us_58f8c4a3e4b0cb086d7eaf4e"
          id="MAA4DEgBUABgAWoCdXM" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204);
          text-decoration: underline;"><span class="titletext"
            style="font-weight: bold;"><b style="font-weight: bold;">Climate
              Change</b><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>As
            Genocide: Inaction Equals Annihilation</span></a></h2>
    </div>
    <div class="esc-lead-article-source-wrapper" style="margin: 2px 32px
      2px 1px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
      font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
      normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
      letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
      0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
      word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
      background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
      initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
      <table class="al-attribution single-line-height" style="font-size:
        11px; line-height: 13px; font-family: arial, sans-serif; color:
        rgb(153, 153, 153);" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td class="al-attribution-cell source-cell"
              style="vertical-align: middle; padding-right: 0px;
              display: inline-block; white-space: normal;"><span
                class="al-attribution-source" style="white-space:
                nowrap;">Huffington Post</span></td>
            <td class="al-attribution-cell timestamp-cell"
              style="vertical-align: middle; padding-right: 6px;
              display: inline-block; white-space: normal;"><span
                class="dash-separator" style="font-size: 11px;
                line-height: 13px; color: rgb(153, 153, 153);"> -<span
                  class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span
                class="al-attribution-timestamp" style="white-space:
                nowrap;">‎14 hours ago‎</span></td>
            <td class="al-attribution-cell sharebar-cell"
              style="vertical-align: middle; padding-right: 6px;
              display: inline-block;">
              <table id="52779465813860-sharebar" class="share-bar-table
                yesscript" style="font-size: 11px; line-height: 0;
                font-family: arial, sans-serif; table-layout: fixed;
                display: inline-block; margin-bottom: -4px; margin-left:
                8px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
                <tbody>
                  <tr>
                    <td class="share-bar-cell sharebox-cell"
                      style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 0px 1px;
                      cursor: pointer; width: 17px; height: 16px;"><br>
                    </td>
                    <td class="share-bar-cell" style="vertical-align:
                      middle; padding: 0px 1px; cursor: pointer; width:
                      17px; height: 16px;"><br>
                    </td>
                    <td class="share-bar-cell" style="vertical-align:
                      middle; padding: 0px 1px; cursor: pointer; width:
                      17px; height: 16px;"><br>
                    </td>
                    <td class="share-bar-cell" style="vertical-align:
                      middle; padding: 0px 1px; cursor: pointer; width:
                      17px; height: 16px;"><br>
                    </td>
                  </tr>
                </tbody>
              </table>
            </td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </div>
    <blockquote> This goes beyond indifference. This is complicity in
      mass extermination.<br>
      Here's the question I think we all should be asking: Is this what
      a world battered by climate change will be like  -  one in which
      tens of millions, even hundreds of millions of people perish from
      disease, starvation, and heat prostration while the rest ...<br>
          History and social science research indicate that, as
      environmental conditions deteriorate, people will naturally
      compete over access to vital materials and the opportunists in any
      society  -  warlords, militia leaders, demagogues, government
      officials, and the like  -  will exploit such clashes for their
      personal advantage.  "The data suggests a definite link between
      food insecurity and conflict," points out Ertharin Cousin, head of
      the U.N.'s World Food Program.  "Climate is an added stress
      factor." In this sense, the current famines in Nigeria, Somalia,
      South Sudan, and Yemen provide us with a perfect template for our
      future, one in which resource wars and climate mayhem team up as
      temperatures continue their steady rise.<br>
        Inaction Equals Annihilation<br>
      In this context, consider the moral consequences of inaction on
      climate change. Once it seemed that the process of global warming
      would occur slowly enough to allow societies to adapt to higher
      temperatures without excessive disruption, and that the entire
      human family would somehow make this transition more or less
      simultaneously. That now looks more and more like a fairy tale.
      Climate change is occurring far too swiftly for all human
      societies to adapt to it successfully.  Only the richest are
      likely to succeed in even the most tenuous way. Unless colossal
      efforts are undertaken now to halt the emission of greenhouse
      gasses, those living in less affluent societies can expect to
      suffer from extremes of flooding, drought, starvation, disease,
      and death in potentially staggering numbers.<br>
      Also posted  <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/176269/">Tomgram:
        Michael Klare, Do African Famines Presage Global Climate-Change
        Catastrophe?</a><br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
        href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/176269/">http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/176269/</a><br>
    </blockquote>
    <!--EndFragment--><br>
    <font size="+1"><b><a
href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/22/AR2007042200353.html?hpid=moreheadlines">This
          Day in Climate History April 21, 2007</a> -  from D.R. Tucker</b></font><br>
    <blockquote> At the White House Correspondents' Association dinner,
      White House senior advisor Karl Rove reacts scornfully to a
      request by environmentalist Laurie David to have the George W.
      Bush administration reconsider its approach to the climate-change
      issue.<br>
      <blockquote> Global warming was the talking point last night at
        the White House Correspondents' Association dinner when singer
        Sheryl Crow and "Inconvenient Truth" producer Laurie David
        walked over to Table 92 at the Hilton Washington to chat with
        Karl Rove -- and the resulting exchange was suitably heated.<br>
        "I am floored by what I just experienced with Karl Rove," David
        reports. "I went over to him and said, 'I urge you to take a new
        look at global warming.' He went zero to 100 with me. . . . I've
        never had anyone be so rude."<br>
        Rove's version: "She came over to insult me and she succeeded."<br>
        Things got so hot that Crow stepped in to defuse the situation
        and then got into it with Rove herself. "You work for me," she
        told the presidential adviser, according to singed bystanders.
        "No," was his response. "I work for the American people."<br>
        News of the dust-up filtered quickly through the room. Some
        witnesses said David was very aggressive with Rove; a shaken
        Crow later said that Rove was "combative and unresponsive." <br>
      </blockquote>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/22/AR2007042200353.html?hpid=moreheadlines">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/22/AR2007042200353.html?hpid=moreheadlines</a>
      <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/46501">http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/46501</a> <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/23/washington/23rove.html?_r=0">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/23/washington/23rove.html?_r=0</a><br>
    </blockquote>
    <font size="+1"><i>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
      </i></font><font size="+1"><i>                 </i></font><font
      size="+1"><i> safely forward this email.</i></font>
    <blockquote>
      <blockquote><small>. </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
          NO collecting IP addresses.  This is a text-only mailing.  It
          carries no graphics nor images which may originate from remote
          servers. </small><small> Text-only messages provide greater
          privacy to the receiver and sender.  </small><small> </small><br>
        <small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
          for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
          commercial purposes. </small><br>
        <small>To subscribe, email:  <a
            class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
            href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a> 
          with subject:  subscribe,  To Unsubscribe, subject: 
          unsubscribe</small><br>
        <small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may 
          subscribe/unsubscribe at  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
            href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small> 
        </small><br>
        <small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
          curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for  <a
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>  
          delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
          governments of all levels.</small><small>   L</small><small>ist
          membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
          restricted to this mailing list. <br>
        </small></blockquote>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>