<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><i>May 24, 2017</i></font><br>
<br>
<font color="#000066"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2017/05/23/climate-trouble-in-trump-country/">Climate
Troubles in Trump Country</a></b></font><br>
More weather extremes.<br>
While climate communicators are trying to figure out the magic
formula to snap people out of denial, the Earth continues to speak
in ever more convincing ways.<br>
(video) <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://youtu.be/ABcG-QCBr6k">Weather, or Climate Change</a>?
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://youtu.be/ABcG-QCBr6k">https://youtu.be/ABcG-QCBr6k</a><br>
"It's absolutely devastating, especially when you work with tight
budgets we currently have," Walker said.<br>
Add climate change to the common bouts of inundation, and towns
along the Mississippi are confronting a new reality, Walker said,
one that compounds the misery of previous floods. The 180-year-old
town has had five flood events in the past four years, he said, and
four of those have been in the top 10 flooding disasters in Alton's
history.<br>
"We're now living in a world of extremes on the Mississippi River,"
he said. "We just don't get normal spring rains anymore. We get huge
downpours."<br>
<font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2017/05/23/climate-trouble-in-trump-country/">https://climatecrocks.com/2017/05/23/climate-trouble-in-trump-country/</a></font><br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2017/05/23/new-video-despite-dilbert-its-data-not-models/">New
Video: Despite Dilbert, it's Data, not Models - Climate Denial
Crock of the Week</a></b><br>
I was already working on this video when Scott Adam's laughably
unfunny attempt to have <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climatecrock.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/dilb_mannsara.jpg">Dilbert
do climate science appeared</a>, and set the denia-sphere
atwitter. <br>
Some will still prefer the cartoon version of science, but
fortunately, there are real experts to set the record straight, and
I talk to them regularly.<br>
I promised Mr Adams that a video was coming to help him out.<br>
Here 'tis. (Video <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://youtu.be/ZY-pO_zTVvU">https://youtu.be/ZY-pO_zTVvU</a>
)<br>
Below, compare model projections from 40 years ago, via archival
footage, with actual observations from today. Eye Opening. (video
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://youtu.be/ox5hbkg34Ow">https://youtu.be/ox5hbkg34Ow</a>
)<br>
<font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2017/05/23/new-video-despite-dilbert-its-data-not-models/">https://climatecrocks.com/2017/05/23/new-video-despite-dilbert-its-data-not-models/</a></font><br>
<br>
<div class="esc-lead-article-title-wrapper" style="margin: 0px 32px
1px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
<h2 class="esc-lead-article-title" style="font-size: 16px;
line-height: 18px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-weight:
bold;"><a target="_blank" class="article
usg-AFQjCNEc_ElnZ5LdGY5fFDvEyNlavT3iLQ
sig2-TGm8qoCvrEeBQpdnPIJw6g did-2071584273365573473"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/may/23/climate-change-government-court-cases-study"
id="MAA4DEgCUABgAWoCdXM" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204);
text-decoration: underline;"><span class="titletext"
style="font-weight: bold;">More people heading to court to
spur action on<b style="font-weight: bold;"> climate change</b>,
study finds</span></a></h2>
</div>
The lion's share of the litigation is in the US, but the number of
countries with such cases has tripled since 2014.<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/20767/climate-change-litigation.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y">UN
Environment and Columbia law school, which undertook the research,</a>
found a "proliferation" of cases instigated by citizens and
environmental groups demanding action on areas such as sea-level
rise, coal-fired power plants and oil drilling.<br>
"It's patently clear we need more concrete action on climate change,
including addressing the root causes and helping communities adapt
to the consequences," said Erik Solheim, head of UN Environment.
"The science can stand up in a court of law, and governments need to
make sure their responses to the problem do too."<br>
The US has been the staging ground for 654 climate-related cases,
almost three times that of the rest of the world combined. Some of
these cases have proved pivotal, such as a 2007 case where various
states and cities demanded the Environmental Protection Agency
regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions.<br>
Other cases are continuing, such as the 21 children who are
represented in a lawsuit against the federal government, claiming
that its failure to sufficiently cut emissions violates their
constitutional right to life, liberty and property. The Sierra Club,
an environmental group, said the case would "upend climate law as we
know it" should it be successful.<br>
Australia, with 80 cases, and the UK, with 49 cases, are the next
largest national sources of climate litigation, although the report
notes that legal action is starting to emanate from all corners of
the world. <br>
<font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/may/23/climate-change-government-court-cases-study">https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/may/23/climate-change-government-court-cases-study</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/20767/climate-change-litigation.pdf">http://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/20767/climate-change-litigation.pdf</a><br>
</font><br>
<font color="#000066"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://journalistsresource.org/studies/environment/climate-change/hurricane-damage-global-warming-climate-change">Estimating
hurricane damage in an era of global warming </a></b></font><br>
(Journalist Resource) <br>
The changing climate is expected to breed fiercer hurricanes. As the
dollar value of the damage increases over time, the cleanup will
become harder for America to afford. <br>
A new paper looks at the combined effect, over the next 60 years,
of stronger storms and a growing population along America's
vulnerable East and Gulf coasts. It finds that cleanup will cost a
small but growing share of economic output.<br>
An academic study worth reading: "Projected Increases in Hurricane
Damage in the United States: The Role of Climate Change and Coastal
Development," in Ecological Economics, 2017.<br>
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Droid
Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal;
font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal;
font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2;
text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255,
255); text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
initial; display: inline !important; float: none;"></span>Key
takeaways:<br>
- Dinan finds that the damage from hurricanes, measured as a share
of economic output (GDP), will increase. That means not only that
future hurricanes will cost more dollars to clean up, but that the
cleanup will be harder for the country to afford. She expects the
annual cost of damage, in constant 2015 dollars, to rise from an
estimated $28 billion (0.16 percent of GDP) these days to $151
billion (0.22 percent of GDP) in 2075. She notes, however, that
exact numbers are uncertain.<br>
- The absolute damage will increase because Americans are building
more and denser communities along the coasts.<br>
- Taken together, she estimates the increase in climate
change-related hurricane damage and damage to new coastal
development at $123 billion (the difference between $151 billion and
$28 billion).<br>
- That is a synergistic effect. Separating them, she finds damage
from climate change increases by $35 billion; damage to the new
coastal development increases by $41 billion.<br>
- She estimates the value of hurricane damage to new coastal
developments alone at $47 billion: "That $47 billion reflects the
additional damage that climate change has on the additional property
exposure attributable to coastal development."<br>
- By comparing the number of people currently living in counties
facing "substantial" expected storm damage (defined as "expected per
capita damage that is greater than 5 percent of the county's average
per capita income") to the number of people expected in such
counties in 2075, Dinan estimates that this at-risk population will
grow eight-fold over the model period.<br>
<font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://journalistsresource.org/studies/environment/climate-change/hurricane-damage-global-warming-climate-change">https://journalistsresource.org/studies/environment/climate-change/hurricane-damage-global-warming-climate-change</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014EF000239/abstract">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014EF000239/abstract</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="stream-item-header" style="color: rgb(20, 23, 26);
font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style:
normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal;
font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2;
text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(245, 248,
250); text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
initial;"><a class="account-group js-account-group
js-action-profile js-user-profile-link js-nav"
href="https://twitter.com/ClimateSignals"
data-user-id="142864417" style="background: transparent; color:
rgb(101, 119, 134); text-decoration: none;"><span
class="FullNameGroup"><strong class="fullname
show-popup-with-id " data-aria-label-part=""
style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(20, 23, 26); font-size:
14px;">Climate Signals</strong><span></span><span
class="UserBadges" style="font-size: 0.9em; position:
relative; top: 1px;"></span><span class="UserNameBreak"> </span></span><span
class="username u-dir" dir="ltr" data-aria-label-part=""
style="unicode-bidi: embed; direction: ltr !important;
text-align: left !important; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(101,
119, 134);">@<b style="font-weight: normal;">ClimateSignals</b></span></a><span
class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><small class="time"
style="font-size: 14px; color: rgb(101, 119, 134);"><span
class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a
href="https://twitter.com/ClimateSignals/status/867157720910110720"
class="tweet-timestamp js-permalink js-nav js-tooltip"
data-conversation-id="867157720910110720"
data-original-title="4:18 PM - 23 May 2017" style="background:
transparent; color: rgb(101, 119, 134); text-decoration: none;
font-size: 14px;"><span class="_timestamp js-short-timestamp
js-relative-timestamp" data-time="1495581486"
data-time-ms="1495581486000" data-long-form="true"></span><span
class="u-hiddenVisually" data-aria-label-part="last"
style="border: 0px !important; clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px)
!important; font-size: 1px !important; height: 1px
!important; overflow: hidden !important; padding: 0px
!important; position: absolute !important; width: 1px
!important;">46 minutes ago</span></a></small>
<div class="ProfileTweet-action ProfileTweet-action--more
js-more-ProfileTweet-actions" style="display: inline-block;
min-width: 0px; float: right; margin: -2px -9px 0px 0px;">
<div class="dropdown" style="position: relative;"><button
class="ProfileTweet-actionButton u-textUserColorHover
dropdown-toggle js-dropdown-toggle" type="button"
style="color: rgb(170, 184, 194); font-style: inherit;
font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch:
inherit; font-size: 16px; line-height: 1; font-family:
inherit; margin: 0px; overflow: visible; text-transform:
none; -webkit-appearance: button; cursor: pointer;
background: transparent; border: 0px; padding: 2px 9px;
transition: box-shadow 0.15s ease-in-out; display:
inline-block; position: relative;">
<div class="IconContainer js-tooltip" title="More"
style="display: inline-block;"><span class="Icon
Icon--caretDownLight Icon--smallest" style="background:
transparent; display: inline-block; font-style: normal;
vertical-align: baseline; position: relative; font-size:
12px; line-height: 12px;"></span><span
class="u-hiddenVisually" style="border: 0px !important;
clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px) !important; font-size: 1px
!important; height: 1px !important; overflow: hidden
!important; padding: 0px !important; position: absolute
!important; width: 1px !important;">More</span></div>
</button></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="js-tweet-text-container" style="color: rgb(20, 23, 26);
font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style:
normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal;
font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2;
text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(245, 248,
250); text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
initial;">
<p class="TweetTextSize js-tweet-text tweet-text" data-aria-label-part="0" style="margin: 0px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;" lang="en">Extreme rains driving flooding in Charleston right now consistent with global trend driven by <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/climatechange?src=hash" data-query-source="hashtag_click" class="twitter-hashtag pretty-link js-nav" dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; color: rgb(0, 132, 180); text-decoration: none;"><s style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 132, 180);">#</s><b style="font-weight: 400; color: rgb(0, 132, 180);">climatechange</b></a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/chswx?src=hash" data-query-source="hashtag_click" class="twitter-hashtag pretty-link js-nav" dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; color: rgb(0, 132, 180); text-decoration: none;"><s style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 132, 180);">#</s><b style="font-weight: 400; color: rgb(0, 132, 180);"><strong style="font-weight: bold;">chswx</strong></b></a> <a href="https://t.co/kODJZ3gjRm" rel="nofollow noopener" dir="ltr" data-expanded-url="http://www.climatesignals.org/climate-signals/increased-extreme-precipitation" class="twitter-timeline-link" target="_blank" title="http://www.climatesignals.org/climate-signals/increased-extreme-precipitation" style="background: transparent; color: rgb(0, 132, 180); text-decoration: none;"><span class="tco-ellipsis"></span><span class="invisible" style="font-size: 0px; line-height: 0;">http://www.</span><span class="js-display-url">climatesignals.org/climate-signal</span><span class="invisible" style="font-size: 0px; line-height: 0;">s/increased-extreme-precipitation</span><span class="tco-ellipsis"><span class="invisible" style="font-size: 0px; line-height: 0;"> </span>…</span></a></p>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/climate-change-global-warming-nuclear-war-asteroid-pandemic-volcano-global-catastrophe-a7752171.html">Seven
in 10 Brits support 'world government' to protect humanity from
global catastrophes</a></b><br>
(The Independent) The report warned that if the bleakest
scientific estimates of how bad global warming could get turned out
to be correct there was "a high likelihood of human civilization
coming to an end".<br>
Nearly seven out of 10 people in the UK support the creation of a
form of world government that would be able to force countries to
deal with major risks facing the world such as climate change and
nuclear weapons, according to a major new survey.<br>
Sixty-two per cent felt the world had become more insecure in the
last two years and 69 per cent said they would support the creation
of a new "supranational organisation to make enforceable global
decisions" about major threats.<br>
A lower proportion, but still a majority (54 per cent), said they
would be happy for the UK to give up some of its sovereignty to
address the world's most serious problems.<br>
<font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/climate-change-global-warming-nuclear-war-asteroid-pandemic-volcano-global-catastrophe-a7752171.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/climate-change-global-warming-nuclear-war-asteroid-pandemic-volcano-global-catastrophe-a7752171.html</a></font><br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2017/05/23/states-voters-pushing-back-on-trump-teams-doomsday-agenda-and-they-dont-like-it/">States,
Voters, Pushing Back on Trump Team's Doomsday Agenda – and They
Don't Like it</a></b><br>
by greenman3610<br>
"Whatever they do in Washington, they can't change the facts"<br>
Old enough to remember when conservatives advocated "states rights".
Oh, wait. That's only when they want to stop black people from
voting. It's a slave-owner thing. Got it. Nowadays, when states want
to acknowledge science and fact - the administration has a problem.
Fortunately, aroused voters, and mega-uprisings like the March for
Science, are helping science-savvy politicians push …<br>
<font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2017/05/23/states-voters-pushing-back-on-trump-teams-doomsday-agenda-and-they-dont-like-it/">https://climatecrocks.com/2017/05/23/states-voters-pushing-back-on-trump-teams-doomsday-agenda-and-they-dont-like-it/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="esc-lead-article-title-wrapper" style="margin: 0px 32px
1px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
<h2 class="esc-lead-article-title" style="font-size: 16px;
line-height: 18px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;"><a
target="_blank" class="article
usg-AFQjCNGXnNQhkHeDKksSJ-bwtMK4Lc2jbg
sig2-potX9V0LrRepQ-jLvlA2aw did--7210109404889151437"
href="http://www.newsobserver.com/news/weather/article152016942.html"
id="MAA4AEgJUABgAWoCdXN6AA" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204);
text-decoration: underline;"><span class="titletext"
style="font-weight: bold;">'Put up or shut up': WRAL's Greg
Fishel goes off on<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><b
style="font-weight: bold;">climate change </b>deniers</span></a></h2>
</div>
RALEIGH Popular local weatherman Greg Fishel had strong words for
climate change deniers on his Facebook page on Sunday.<br>
Fishel, chief meteorologist at WRAL, went off on people who question
the science behind climate change, telling them to "put up or shut
up." The post had earned more than 3,500 reactions by Monday
afternoon.<br>
"You know everybody reaches their breaking point and quite frankly I
have reached mine with the folks who post all over the internet
about the scientific fallacies of man induced climate change,"
Fishel wrote. "All of them are guest bloggers or essayists. None of
this stuff has ever been published in a peer reviewed atmospheric
science or climate journal. But we live in an age today where higher
education and research are no longer respected. Heck, think of all
the money my parents wasted on my education when I could have waited
for the age of twitter and Facebook and declared myself as an expert
in the field of my choice."<br>
For most of his 36 years broadcasting the weather in the Triangle,
Fishel also held a contrarian view about climate change. He didn't
believe that humans had much to do with warming the Earth's
atmosphere and would say as much when the topic came up on the air.<br>
But several years ago, he says he decided he wasn't being
open-minded about the issue and began to study what climate
scientists were saying about it. He now approaches the issue on the
air and on social media with the zeal of a convert.<br>
If someone does have "a critical piece to the puzzle no other
scientist has," Fishel implored them to submit their findings to one
of the American Meteorological Society's peer reviewed journals for
publication.<br>
"If they are rejected, and the author feels unfairly, then make
public each and every one of the reviewers' comments for the entire
world to see," Fishel wrote. "If there is bias and corruption in the
peer review process, everyone needs to know about it so this flawed
process can be halted and corrected."<br>
But Fishel said he doubts any of the climate change deniers "has the
guts to do this" and said he thinks they'll continue "with their
pathetic excuse for science education.<br>
"So prove me wrong bloggers and essayists. Submit your work the way
real scientists do, and see where it takes you," he wrote. "Uncover
that bias and corruption you're so convinced is present. If you end
up being correct, society will owe you a huge debt of gratitude. If
you're wrong, stop muddying the scientific waters with ideological
trash."<br>
Abbie Bennett: @AbbieRBennett<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.newsobserver.com/news/weather/article152016942.html">http://www.newsobserver.com/news/weather/article152016942.html</a></font><br>
<font size="+1"><br>
</font><b><a
href="https://nasevents.webex.com/mw3200/mywebex/default.do?nomenu=true&siteurl=nasevents&service=6&rnd=0.876687590895166&main_url=https%3A%2F%2Fnasevents.webex.com%2Fec3200%2Feventcenter%2Fevent%2FeventAction.do%3FtheAction%3Ddetail%26%26%26EMK%3D4832534b00000004b48bc2f40fcd3e572b8fe196e628b96b422b1155d2863104df5032072e844606%26siteurl%3Dnasevents%26confViewID%3D61591430597999930%26SourceId%3Dmailchimp%26encryptTicket%3DSDJTSwAAAARrghTw79ZSfp5LhByfaDPcU6OCYmo084f91plrJ7xQdg2%26&utm_source=America%27s+Climate+Choices&utm_campaign=a663f82bf8-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_19&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_321b36af61-a663f82bf8-243681765&mc_cid=a663f82bf8&mc_eid=7f758defc9">WEBINAR:
Climate Risk Resilience in U.S. Cities and Towns--Current
Processes and Emerging Trends</a></b><font size="+1"><br>
</font>Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:00-3:00 pm EDT<br>
<blockquote>The Geographical Sciences Committee of the National
Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine invites you to
join the webinar Climate Risk Resilience in U.S. Cities and Towns:
Current Processes and Emerging Trends, presented by Dr. William D.
Solecki.<br>
Increased climate variability and climate change has encouraged
U.S. communities to review and enhance their environmental risk
and hazard mitigation strategies. Much of this effort has focused
on resiliency efforts, defined as the capacity to withstand or
absorb a shock or stress and quickly recover from an extreme
event. Cities are developing climate adaptation plans, policies,
and other tactics to improve their resiliency to climate risks and
have started to implement some of these efforts. The objective of
the presentation is to review and assess these city-level
activities, define key concerns that city stakeholders and
practitioners have regarding climate resiliency, and evaluate
significant challenges and opportunities that are faced. Emerging
best practices and lessons learned will be reviewed. The role of
science-policy linkages, co-production strategies, city-level
knowledge networks, and federal-state-municipal connections will
be examined. A case study of post-Hurricane Sandy New York and the
extended urban Northeast U.S. will be used to illustrate these
points.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<font size="+1"><b><a href="http://youtu.be/8ZUoYGAI5i0"
moz-do-not-send="true">This Day in Climate History May 24,
2006 </a>- from D.R. Tucker</b></font><br>
"An Inconvenient Truth" is released in the United States.
BoxOfficeGuru.com's Gitesh Pandya notes:<br>
"Setting the limited release box office on fire was the global
warming documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth' which opened in only
four theaters but grossed a hefty $367,311. That gave the Al Gore
pic a stunning average of $91,827 per location over four days.
Distributed by Paramount Vantage, the new incarnation of Paramount
Classics, Truth collected $281,330 over the Friday-to-Sunday portion
averaging a scorching $70,332. Total since Wednesday stands at
$490,860. Opening this weekend on multiple screens at a pair of
theaters in both New York and Los Angeles, Truth will add about 60
more playdates on Friday and expand throughout June hoping to become
the dominant doc of the summer."<br>
(Al Gore and director Davis Guggenheim would appear on the June 2,
2006 edition of "EcoTalk" on Air America to discuss the film.)<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://youtu.be/8ZUoYGAI5i0">http://youtu.be/8ZUoYGAI5i0</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.boxofficeguru.com/052906.htm">http://www.boxofficeguru.com/052906.htm</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blogsofbainbridge.typepad.com/ecotalkblog/2006/06/al_gore_about_a.html">http://blogsofbainbridge.typepad.com/ecotalkblog/2006/06/al_gore_about_a.html</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blogsofbainbridge.typepad.com/ecotalkblog/2006/06/davis_guggenhei.html">http://blogsofbainbridge.typepad.com/ecotalkblog/2006/06/davis_guggenhei.html</a><font
size="+1"><i><br>
<br>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i> </i></font><font
size="+1"><i> safely forward this email.</i></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><small>. </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
This is a text-only mailing. It carries no graphics nor
images which may originate from remote servers. </small><small>
Text-only messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender. </small><small> </small><br>
<small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes. </small><br>
<small>To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
with subject: subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject:
unsubscribe</small><br>
<small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may
subscribe/unsubscribe at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small>
</small><br>
<small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels.</small><small> L</small><small>ist
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</small></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>