<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <font size="+1"><i>June 21, 2017<br>
      </i></font> <br>
    <b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/jun/20/dust-on-desert-winds-reduces-air-pollution">Dust
        on desert winds reduces air pollution</a></b><br>
    Study of Gobi sand blowing over east China finds air stagnates and
    human-made <b>pollution rises when dusty winds die down</b>...<br>
    People in China breathe more easily when dust-laden winds blow in
    from the Gobi desert. Paradoxical as it sounds, desert dust helps to
    keep human-made pollution down, a new study shows....<br>
    This research showed that when the winds were slack the lack of
    desert dust in the air allowed more solar radiation to reach the
    surface. This lessened the temperature difference between land and
    sea, reducing winds even further and helping the air to stagnate
    over east China, creating the perfect conditions for a build-up of
    pollutants produced by people. The effect was most pronounced during
    the winter monsoon season...<br>
    The<a moz-do-not-send="true"
      href="https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15333"> findings,
      published in Nature Communications,</a> suggest that air pollution
    in eastern China increases by as much as 13% when the desert winds
    are at their slackest...<br>
    Observational data from dozens of sites backed up the model
    findings, showing that the air became cleaner two or three days
    after the winds brought dust into the region...<br>
    <font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/jun/20/dust-on-desert-winds-reduces-air-pollution">https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/jun/20/dust-on-desert-winds-reduces-air-pollution</a></font><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2017/06/20/honduras-farmers-climate-challenges">(audio) 
        Struggling Honduran Farmers Cope With Climate Challenges</a></b><br>
    World leaders have called President Trump's withdrawal from the
    Paris climate accord "regrettable" and "disappointing." But for
    Honduran farmers, climate change is personal.<br>
    The country has the dubious distinction of being ranked  No. 3 in
    the world  on the list of countries most affected by global warming
    between 1996 and 2014. Among Hondurans' challenges are storms, water
    shortages and pests, and now, they risk losing millions in USAID
    money earmarked to fight back.<br>
    Here & Now's Karyn Miller-Medzon visited Honduras, where she met
    with affected farmers.<br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2017/06/20/honduras-farmers-climate-challenges">http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2017/06/20/honduras-farmers-climate-challenges</a><br>
    - more:<br>
    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://latinamericagoesglobal.org/2017/05/just-facts-development-assistance-latin-american-caribbean-trumps-state-skinny-budget/">Development
      assistance to Latin America and the Caribbean in Trump's "skinny
      budget"</a><br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://latinamericagoesglobal.org/2017/05/just-facts-development-assistance-latin-american-caribbean-trumps-state-skinny-budget/">http://latinamericagoesglobal.org/2017/05/just-facts-development-assistance-latin-american-caribbean-trumps-state-skinny-budget/</a><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="esc-lead-article-title-wrapper" style="margin: 0px 32px
      1px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
      font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
      normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
      letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
      0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
      word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
      background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
      initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
      <h2 class="esc-lead-article-title" style="font-size: 16px;
        line-height: 18px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-weight:
        bold;"><a target="_blank" class="article
          usg-AFQjCNEF6R63KLvsvhnB1tsivIujcYhSqA
          sig2-avRpYQhbvzOoOzeRXEjWNg did--3941088447469397298"
href="https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/how-cities-are-taking-up-the-climate-change-fight"
          id="MAA4DEgBUABgAWoCdXM" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204);
          text-decoration: none;"><span class="titletext"
            style="font-weight: bold;">2500 Cities Have Taken Up the<span
              class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><b
              style="font-weight: bold;">Climate</b>-<b
              style="font-weight: bold;">Change</b><span
              class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Fight</span></a></h2>
    </div>
    More than 2,500 cities have now listed climate-change pledges on the
    Non-State Actor Zone for Climate Action (NAZCA) portal launched as
    part of the 2014 Lima-Paris Action Agenda, HSBC notes.<br>
    "We think this is extremely important because NSAs [non-state
    actors] can move quicker in implementing climate change policies and
    measures," reads the report.<br>
    Cities and other NSAs tend to be faster than countries at making
    decisions, and are more accountable to their local electorates. They
    may also have greater control over which budgets can be assigned to
    climate-change mitigation policies. (Some experts, however, warn
    that cities are having serious problems implementing their own
    climate goals.)<br>
    <font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/how-cities-are-taking-up-the-climate-change-fight">https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/how-cities-are-taking-up-the-climate-change-fight</a></font><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="esc-lead-article-title-wrapper" style="margin: 0px 32px
      1px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
      font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
      normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
      letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
      0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
      word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
      background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
      initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
      <h2 class="esc-lead-article-title" style="font-size: 16px;
        line-height: 18px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-weight:
        bold;"><a target="_blank" class="article
          usg-AFQjCNHQp4b9MSu7darl5rYajKItjYDiFg
          sig2-oC7Ein9Z2aKFAXKycejo-g did--5295174792035133553"
href="https://thinkprogress.org/businesses-call-for-climate-tax-815dd8d00a18"
          id="MAA4DEgGUABgAWoCdXM" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204);
          text-decoration: underline;"><span class="titletext"
            style="font-weight: bold;">Exxon, Shell, and BP support a
            Republican plan to do something about <b
              style="font-weight: bold;">climate change</b></span></a></h2>
    </div>
    A carbon tax has long been touted as the free-market climate action
    path.<br>
    A group of major businesses, including Johnson & Johnson,
    General Motors, and fossil fuel giants ExxonMobil, BP, and Shell,
    announced Tuesday they have joined a Republican-led council that
    proposes to put a $40 tax on carbon emissions.<br>
    The companies, along with a list of high profile business people and
    two environmental groups, are part of the Climate Leadership
    Council, whose platform was written by former cabinet members James
    Baker and George Shultz.<br>
    The council's plan calls for starting fee of $40 per ton on carbon
    emissions, which rises over time and is returned to taxpayers via
    the Social Security Administration. It also includes a "border
    carbon adjustment" - in which goods coming from outside the United
    States would be charged for their carbon footprints - and
    "significant regulatory rollback," intended to take carbon
    regulations out of the hands of the EPA.<br>
    <font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://thinkprogress.org/businesses-call-for-climate-tax-815dd8d00a18">https://thinkprogress.org/businesses-call-for-climate-tax-815dd8d00a18</a></font><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="esc-lead-article-title-wrapper" style="margin: 0px 32px
      1px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
      font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
      normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
      letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
      0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
      word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
      background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
      initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
      <h2 class="esc-lead-article-title" style="font-size: 16px;
        line-height: 18px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-weight:
        bold;"><a target="_blank" class="article
          usg-AFQjCNGTU6qayI9w6kBo3jEXPCtrPxxxHg
          sig2-KQfQnPHPrkWBG6ISparW0Q did--7881895175548313942"
href="http://news.psu.edu/story/472084/2017/06/19/research/mann-receives-schneider-award-outstanding-climate-science"
          style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204); text-decoration: none;"><span
            class="titletext" style="font-weight: bold;">Mann receives
            Schneider award for outstanding climate science
            communication | Penn State University</span></a></h2>
    </div>
    SAN FRANCISCO - Michael Mann, distinguished professor of atmospheric
    science and director of the Earth System Science Center, Penn State,
    will receive the seventh annual Stephen H. Schneider Award for
    Outstanding Climate Science Communications from Climate One at the
    Commonwealth Club.<br>
    The $15,000 award is given to a natural or social scientist who has
    made extraordinary scientific contributions and communicated that
    knowledge to a broad public in a clear and compelling fashion. The
    award was established in honor of Stephen Henry Schneider, one of
    the founding fathers of climatology, who died suddenly in 2010.<br>
    The jurors for the award state that Mann exemplifies the rare
    ability to be both a superb scientist and powerful communicator in
    the mold of Schneider.<br>
    "Professor Mike Mann has been a world leader in scientific efforts
    to understand the natural variability of the climate system and to
    reconstruct global temperature variations over the past two
    millennia,"<br>
    <font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://news.psu.edu/story/472084/2017/06/19/research/mann-receives-schneider-award-outstanding-climate-science">http://news.psu.edu/story/472084/2017/06/19/research/mann-receives-schneider-award-outstanding-climate-science</a></font><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="esc-lead-article-title-wrapper" style="margin: 0px 32px
      1px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
      font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
      normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
      letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
      0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
      word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
      background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
      initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
      <h2 class="esc-lead-article-title" style="font-size: 16px;
        line-height: 18px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-weight:
        bold;"><a target="_blank" class="article
          usg-AFQjCNFlPQCmx7R6BEpPfQnWP5sIJXRBaQ
          sig2-xYJxJkDE6fNBaskhXuzSaA did--4914282817269658679"
href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/06/20/climate-change-give-up-on-trump-congress-pressure-corporations-henry-waxman-column/102754204/"
          id="MAA4DEgEUABgAWoCdXM" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204);
          text-decoration: underline;"><span class="titletext"
            style="font-weight: bold;">USAToday  After Paris<span
              class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><b
              style="font-weight: bold;">climate change</b> pullout,
            give up on Trump and Congress for now</span></a></h2>
    </div>
    Henry Waxman,  -- <b>To confront our greatest common threat, we
      need to put pressure on corporations. That's where the most change
      can be made.</b><br>
    The withdrawal of the United States from the Paris climate accord is
    one of President Trump's most irresponsible moves yet.<br>
    But let's not kid ourselves, it was not reasonable to expect Trump
    to keep us in the Paris accords - or to meet our obligations even if
    we stayed in. Given his short and stunningly terrible record on
    climate and the environment, we can reasonably conclude that this
    likely never will be a climate-friendly administration.<br>
    I believe it is time to accept that. At least until 2018, we will
    not make any real progress in reducing America's greenhouse gas
    emissions through federal policy. At best, we will be able to defend
    existing climate, renewable energy and other environmental programs
    and budgets. Even that goal, while essential to holding U.S.
    emissions steady, will be hard enough for dedicated advocates to
    achieve....<font size="-1" color="#666666"><br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/06/20/climate-change-give-up-on-trump-congress-pressure-corporations-henry-waxman-column/102754204/">https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/06/20/climate-change-give-up-on-trump-congress-pressure-corporations-henry-waxman-column/102754204/</a></font><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="esc-lead-article-title-wrapper" style="margin: 0px 32px
      1px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
      font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
      normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
      letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
      0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
      word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
      background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
      initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
      <h2 class="esc-lead-article-title" style="font-size: 16px;
        line-height: 18px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-weight:
        bold;"><a target="_blank" class="article
          usg-AFQjCNH9FWBkxvyDhGtNUpg1fmrvKR3_Lg
          sig2-cWEqxiykaevvNai9bToQrA did-550291073749318641"
href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/06/19/are-carbon-taxes-the-solution-to-global-warming/"
          id="MAA4C0gEUABgAWoCdXM" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204);
          text-decoration: none;"><span class="titletext"
            style="font-weight: bold;">Are Carbon Taxes The Solution To<span
              class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><b
              style="font-weight: bold;">Global Warming</b>?</span></a></h2>
    </div>
    That all said, getting taxes on carbon to the price where they
    actually do the job that they are required to do hasn't occurred
    anywhere in the world yet. British Columbia's revenue neutral carbon
    tax was stopped at $30 per tonne, which is at least $60 below the
    minimum necessary for the scale of the problem. Australia shut down
    their carbon tax foolishly, even though it was reducing emissions at
    its low price of $23, and didn't get anywhere near high enough to
    make a significant different.<br>
    Carbon taxes aren't the entire solution. But they are part of the
    tool kit.<br>
    Taxes change behavior. They aren't punitive.<br>
    And don't forget the reason why carbon taxes appeal to some
    libertarians and conservatives despite their aversion to government
    in general: revenue neutrality. In this model, when government
    revenues increase through a carbon tax, they decrease via tax cuts
    elsewhere. The typical model is to reduce income taxes.<br>
    That all said, getting taxes on carbon to the price where they
    actually do the job that they are required to do hasn't occurred
    anywhere in the world yet. British Columbia's revenue neutral carbon
    tax was stopped at $30 per tonne, which is at least $60 below the
    minimum necessary for the scale of the problem. Australia shut down
    their carbon tax foolishly, even though it was reducing emissions at
    its low price of $23, and didn't get anywhere near high enough to
    make a significant different.<br>
    Carbon taxes aren't the entire solution. But they are part of the
    tool kit.<br>
    <font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/06/19/are-carbon-taxes-the-solution-to-global-warming/">https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/06/19/are-carbon-taxes-the-solution-to-global-warming/</a></font><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="esc-lead-article-title-wrapper" style="margin: 0px 32px
      1px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif;
      font-size: 13.44px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures:
      normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;
      letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
      0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
      word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
      background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-style:
      initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
      <h2 class="esc-lead-article-title" style="font-size: 16px;
        line-height: 18px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-weight:
        bold;"><a target="_blank" class="article
          usg-AFQjCNFJpdvCWkHxJQG-2G1_d1seBwxOkQ
          sig2-ceRxQwv165mD61GAPhdWQQ did--8106844841464154817"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/21/australia-warned-it-has-radically-underestimated-climate-change-security-threat"
          id="MAA4DEgAUABgAWoCdXM" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204);
          text-decoration: none;"><span class="titletext"
            style="font-weight: bold;">Australia warned it has radically
            underestimated<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><b
              style="font-weight: bold;">climate change</b><span
              class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>security threat</span></a></h2>
    </div>
    As the Senate launches an inquiry into the national security
    ramifications of climate change, a new report has warned global
    warming will cause increasingly regular and severe humanitarian
    crises across the Asia-Pacific.<br>
    Disaster Alley, written by the Breakthrough Centre for Climate
    Restoration, forecasts climate change could potentially displace
    tens of millions from swamped cities, drive fragile states to
    failure, cause intractable political instability, and spark military
    conflict.<br>
    Report co-author Ian Dunlop argues Australia's political and
    corporate leaders, by refusing to accept the need for urgent climate
    action now, are "putting the Australian community in extreme
    danger".<br>
    "Global warming will drive increasingly severe humanitarian crises,
    forced migration, political instability and conflict. The Asia
    Pacific region, including Australia, is considered to be 'disaster
    alley' where some of the worst impacts will be experienced," the
    report, released this morning, says.<font size="-1" color="#666666"><br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/21/australia-warned-it-has-radically-underestimated-climate-change-security-threat">https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/21/australia-warned-it-has-radically-underestimated-climate-change-security-threat</a></font><br>
    <font color="#000099"><br>
      <br>
      <b> </b><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ef0wk1CBFgk">Climate
          Change Implications for Wildfire in Alaska: Randi Jandt</a></b></font><br>
    Randi Jandt is a Fire Ecologist for the Alaska Fire Science
    Consortium located in Fairbanks, Alaska.<br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
      href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ef0wk1CBFgk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ef0wk1CBFgk</a><br>
    <br>
    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.newrepublic.com/blog/the-vine/75723/leaving-global-warming-the-bureaucrats"><br>
    </a><font size="+1"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.newrepublic.com/blog/the-vine/75723/leaving-global-warming-the-bureaucrats">This
          Day in Climate History June 21, 2010</a>  -  from D.R. Tucker</b></font><br>
     In the New Republic, Brad Plumer writes that if the Senate can't
    pass cap-and-trade, the EPA should move ahead with regulating carbon
    emissions. He further observes:<br>
    "In the long term, though, we'd really need a price on carbon to
    transform the country's energy sector and give people incentive to
    develop new clean-energy technologies—having the EPA just flatly
    tell polluters that they have to adopt this or that specific
    pollution-cutting gizmo isn't very good for innovation. But hey,
    maybe a few years from now we'll have a Congress that's ready to
    address this problem. Odder things have happened."<br>
    <font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.newrepublic.com/blog/the-vine/75723/leaving-global-warming-the-bureaucrats">http://www.newrepublic.com/blog/the-vine/75723/leaving-global-warming-the-bureaucrats</a></font><br>
    <br>
    <font size="+1">------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<i><br>
      </i></font><font size="+1"><i>                 </i></font><font
      size="+1"><i> I'm asking for new subscribers -- forward this
        email </i></font>
    <blockquote>
      <blockquote><small>. </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b> 
          This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
          originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
          messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender. 
        </small><small> </small><br>
        <small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
          for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
          commercial purposes. </small><br>
        <small>To subscribe, email:  <a
            class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
            href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a> 
          with subject:  subscribe,  To Unsubscribe, subject: 
          unsubscribe</small><br>
        <small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may 
          subscribe/unsubscribe at  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
            href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small> 
        </small><br>
        <small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
          curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for  <a
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>  
          delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
          governments of all levels.</small><small>   L</small><small>ist
          membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
          restricted to this mailing list. <br>
        </small></blockquote>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>