<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <font size="+1"><i>July 21, 2017</i></font><br>
    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/07/20/this-could-be-the-next-big-strategy-for-suing-over-climate-change/"><br>
      <b>This could be the next big strategy for suing over climate
        change</b></a><br>
    Two California coastal counties and one beach-side city touched off
    a possible new legal front in the climate change battle this week,
    suing dozens of major oil, coal, and other fossil fuel companies for
    the damages they say they will incur due to rising seas.<br>
    The three cases, which target firms such as Chevron, ExxonMobil, BP
    and Royal Dutch Shell, assert that the fossil fuel producers are
    collectively responsible for about 20 percent of global carbon
    dioxide emissions between 1965 and 2015. They claim that industry
    “knew or should have known” decades ago about the threat of climate
    change, and want companies to pay the costs of communities forced to
    adapt to rising seas.<br>
    In 2009, the vulnerable Alaskan coastal village of Kivalina used
    similar logic to sue a string of fossil fuel companies. The case
    failed when an appellate court ruled that federal action by the
    Environmental Protection Agency “displaces” their claim.<br>
    An even bigger setback came in 2011 when the Supreme Court decided
    against a public nuisance suit brought by eight states and New York
    City against a group of electric utilities — ruling, once again,
    that since EPA had begun to take action on climate change, the claim
    had been displaced.<br>
    The California cases are also proceeding under a legal doctrine
    called “public nuisance” (among other claims), which charges that
    under California common law, the companies have injured the counties
    and city by contributing to rising seas, and more frequent and
    severe flooding as a result.<br>
    But the difference is that this time, they are making state level
    nuisance claims rather than federal ones, which have already failed
    as courts pointed out that those worried about climate change had
    other recourses, such as EPA action.<br>
    A strength of the lawsuit, note some legal observers, lies in the
    fact that sea level rise is easily measurable, constant (unlike
    climate-affected weather events), and very strongly linked to a
    warming planet. Moreover, analyses have become more and more precise
    when it comes to mapping which locations will be inundated, or
    subjected to greater flooding risks, for a given level of rising
    seas.<br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/07/20/this-could-be-the-next-big-strategy-for-suing-over-climate-change/">https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/07/20/this-could-be-the-next-big-strategy-for-suing-over-climate-change/</a><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <span style="font-family:helvetica
      neue,helvetica,arial,verdana,sans-serif"><strong><a
          moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://climatenexus.org/">(ClimateNexus)</a>
        Trump Nominates Non-Scientist to Top Science Post: </strong>President
      Trump on Wednesday nominated Sam Clovis, a former economics
      professor and conservative talk show radio host, to the U.S.
      Department of Agriculture's top scientific position. Clovis, an
      early advisor to the Trump campaign, has a master’s in business
      administration and a doctoral degree in public administration, and
      appears to have no published scientific or academic work to his
      name. The position he is nominated for, which is tasked to provide
      scientific direction and uphold "scientific integrity" at USDA,
      has previously been held by distinguished scientists with deep
      expertise in certain issue areas.  In a 2014 interview, Clovis
      called evidence of climate change "junk science," claiming that he
      has "enough of a science background to know when I’m being
      boofed." (<a
href="http://climatenexus.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d1f5797e59060083034310930&id=095568d5b9&e=95b355344d"
        target="_blank" style="word-wrap:
        break-word;-ms-text-size-adjust: 100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust:
        100%;color: #709ab9;font-weight: normal;text-decoration:
        underline;">Washington Post</a> $, <a
href="http://climatenexus.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d1f5797e59060083034310930&id=b8ad789d6a&e=95b355344d"
        target="_blank" style="word-wrap:
        break-word;-ms-text-size-adjust: 100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust:
        100%;color: #709ab9;font-weight: normal;text-decoration:
        underline;">Gizmodo</a>, <a
href="http://climatenexus.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d1f5797e59060083034310930&id=cdfd954a08&e=95b355344d"
        target="_blank" style="word-wrap:
        break-word;-ms-text-size-adjust: 100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust:
        100%;color: #709ab9;font-weight: normal;text-decoration:
        underline;">Science</a>)<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://climatenexus.org/"><b>(ClimateNexus)</b></a> 
      <strong>Methane Leaking Out of Tundra: </strong>Thawing tundra
      may be allowing long-buried pockets of methane to be released into
      the atmosphere, new research suggests. A study surveying the
      Mackenzie Delta in Canada, published Wednesday in the journal
      Scientific Reports, suggests that these methane "seeps" on the
      tundra may be more problematic than previously thought. The study
      finds that 17 percent of methane emissions in the area came from
      these seeps, despite emissions hotspots only covering 1 percent of
      the tundra's surface area. The authors write that warming will
      "increase emissions of geologic methane that is currently still
      trapped under thick, continuous permafrost, as new emission
      pathways open due to thawing permafrost." (<a
href="http://climatenexus.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d1f5797e59060083034310930&id=5d09063c9f&e=95b355344d"
        target="_blank" style="word-wrap:
        break-word;-ms-text-size-adjust: 100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust:
        100%;color: #709ab9;font-weight: normal;text-decoration:
        underline;">InsideClimate News</a>, <a
href="http://climatenexus.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d1f5797e59060083034310930&id=9f296c97c4&e=95b355344d"
        target="_blank" style="word-wrap:
        break-word;-ms-text-size-adjust: 100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust:
        100%;color: #709ab9;font-weight: normal;text-decoration:
        underline;">The Independent</a>, <a
href="http://climatenexus.us4.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=d1f5797e59060083034310930&id=2b55e1c4d2&e=95b355344d"
        target="_blank" style="word-wrap:
        break-word;-ms-text-size-adjust: 100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust:
        100%;color: #709ab9;font-weight: normal;text-decoration:
        underline;">Phys.org</a>)</span><br>
    <br>
    <b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/07/20/emails-bush-iraq-war-pr-delve-off-the-record-strategies-dakota-access-pipeline"><br>
        Emails Show Iraq War PR Alums Led Attempt to Discredit Dakota
        Access Protesters</a></b><br>
    By Steve Horn and Curtis Waltman, MuckRock<br>
    Behind the scenes, as law enforcement officials tried to stem
    protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, alumni from the George
    W. Bush White House were leading a crisis communications effort to
    discredit pipeline protesters.<br>
    Emails show that the firms Delve and Off the Record Strategies,
    apparently working on contract with the National Sheriffs’
    Association, worked in secret on talking points, media outreach, and
    communications training for law enforcement dealing with Dakota
    Access opponents mobilized at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in
    Cannon Ball, North Dakota. This revelation comes from documents
    obtained via an open records request from the Laramie County
    Sheriff's Department in Wyoming.<br>
    As previously reported by DeSmog, the GOP-connected firm DCI Group
    led the forward-facing public relations efforts for Dakota Access
    via a front group called Midwest Alliance for Infrastructure Now
    (MAIN). Today MAIN has morphed into a national effort known as Grow
    America’s Infrastructure Now (GAIN)....<br>
    <font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/07/20/emails-bush-iraq-war-pr-delve-off-the-record-strategies-dakota-access-pipeline">https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/07/20/emails-bush-iraq-war-pr-delve-off-the-record-strategies-dakota-access-pipeline</a></font><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <font size="+1"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/science/earth/22clim.html?_r=0">This
          Day in Climate History July 21, 2008 </a>-  from D.R. Tucker</b></font><br>
    July 21, 2008: The UK Office of Communication criticizes Britain's
    Channel 4 for running the 2007 denialism doc "The Great Global
    Warming Swindle." Below, Peter Sinclair of ClimateCrocks.com debunks
    the doc.<br>
    <font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/science/earth/22clim.html?_r=0">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/science/earth/22clim.html?_r=0</a></font><br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://youtu.be/boj9ccV9htk">http://youtu.be/boj9ccV9htk</a><br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://youtu.be/8nrvrkVBt24">http://youtu.be/8nrvrkVBt24</a><br>
    <font size="+1"><i>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
      </i></font><font size="+1"><i>                 </i></font><font
      size="+1"><i> You are encouraged to forward this email </i></font>
    <blockquote>
      <blockquote><small>. </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b> 
          This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
          originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
          messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender. 
        </small><small> </small><br>
        <small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
          for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
          commercial purposes. </small><br>
        <small>To subscribe, email:  <a
            class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
            href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a> 
          with subject:  subscribe,  To Unsubscribe, subject: 
          unsubscribe</small><br>
        <small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may 
          subscribe/unsubscribe at  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
            href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small> 
        </small><br>
        <small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
          curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for  <a
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>  
          delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
          governments of all levels.</small><small>   L</small><small>ist
          membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
          restricted to this mailing list. <br>
        </small></blockquote>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>