<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><i>September 18, 2017<br>
<br>
</i></font> <b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/17/us/neil-degrasse-tyson-on-climate-change-cnntv/index.html">Neil
deGrasse Tyson says it might be 'too late' to recover from
climate change</a></b><br>
(CNN) Scientist and astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson said Sunday
that, in the wake of devastating floods and damage caused by
Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, climate change had become so severe that
the country "might not be able to recover."<br>
In an interview on CNN's "GPS," Tyson got emotional when Fareed
Zakaria asked what he made of Homeland Security Adviser Tom
Bossert's refusal to say whether climate change had been a factor in
Hurricanes Harvey or Irma's strength -- despite scientific evidence
pointing to the fact that it had made the storms more destructive.<br>
"Fifty inches of rain in Houston!" Tyson exclaimed, adding, "This is
a shot across our bow, a hurricane the width of Florida going up the
center of Florida!"<br>
"What will it take for people to recognize that a community of
scientists are learning objective truths about the natural world and
that you can benefit from knowing about it?" he said.<br>
Tyson told Zakaria that he had no patience for those who, as he put
it, "cherry pick" scientific studies according to their belief
system.<br>
"The press will sometimes find a single paper, and say, 'Oh here's a
new truth, if this study holds it.' But an emergent scientific
truth, for it to become an objective truth, a truth that is true
whether or not you believe in it, it requires more than one
scientific paper," he said.<br>
"It requires a whole system of people's research all leaning in the
same direction, all pointing to the same consequences," he added.
"That's what we have with climate change, as induced by human
conduct."<br>
Tyson said he was gravely concerned that by engaging in debates over
the existence of climate change, as opposed to discussions on how
best to tackle it, the country was wasting valuable time and
resources.<br>
"The day two politicians are arguing about whether science is true,
it means nothing gets done. Nothing," he said. "It's the beginning
of the end of an informed democracy, as I've said many times. What
I'd rather happen is you recognize what is scientifically truth,
then you have your political debate."<br>
Tyson told Zakaria that he believed that the longer the delay when
it comes to responding to the ongoing threat of climate change, the
bleaker the outcome. And perhaps, he hazarded, it was already even
too late.<br>
"I worry that we might not be able to recover from this because all
our greatest cities are on the oceans and water's edges,
historically for commerce and transportation," he said.<br>
"And as storms kick in, as water levels rise, they are the first to
go," he said. "And we don't have a system -- we don't have a
civilization with the capacity to pick up a city and move it inland
20 miles. That's -- this is happening faster than our ability to
respond. That could have huge economic consequences."<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/17/us/neil-degrasse-tyson-on-climate-change-cnntv/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/17/us/neil-degrasse-tyson-on-climate-change-cnntv/index.html</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="-1">SEPTEMBER 15, 2017</font><br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/09/15/warning-letter-to-harvey-and-irma-survivors-from-katrina-survivor/">Warning
Letter to Harvey and Irma Survivors From Katrina Survivor</a></b><br>
by BILL QUIGLEY<br>
<b>Dear Fellow Hurricane Survivors:</b><br>
Our hearts go out to you as you try to return to and fix your homes
and lives. Based on our experiences, here are a few things you
should watch out for as you rebuild your communities.<br>
<b>One. </b> Rents are going to skyrocket and waves of evictions are
likely. With so many houses damaged and so many highly paid
contractors coming into your region whose companies will pay
anything to house them, landlords are going to start evicting people
to make way for higher paying occupants. Work with local
organizations to enact a moratorium on evictions and a freeze on
rents to allow working and low income people to come home and have a
place to stay.<br>
<b>Two. </b> Rip off contractors and vulture businesses are probably
already on the scene. Don't give money to anyone unless you know
and trust them and do not pay for everything in advance!<br>
<b>Three. </b> Take pictures of everything that was damaged and
hold onto all receipts for all your disaster expenses. Get a
special binder and keep all your papers in it. Sadly, the process
of getting assistance is going to last for years for many people and
you will need to prove what damage you.<br>
<b>Four. </b> Right after a disaster there is an outpouring of
compassion, support and solidarity. Take what you need for your
community. But realize the window of compassion and support shuts
much quicker than it should. Then people will start blaming the
victims.<br>
<b>Five. </b> Insist on transparency, accountability and
participation in all public and private funding sources for disaster
relief. The government is yours and ours. We need them in times of
disaster but they can also be the biggest obstacle to a just
recovery. Demand they tell the public what is going on and consult
with all parts of our communities, not just the rich and well
connected usual suspects. Same problems arise when dealing with the
private relief organizations from the biggest private disaster
relief organization to many other smaller groups.<br>
<b>Six. </b> Insist on telling your own story. Your truth is a
jewel that shines brightest in your own hands. If you are going to
work with journalists or others make sure the real truth is told,
not just the sensational or heart rending stories of poor, powerless
victims. You may have been victimized by the hurricane but you are
a powerful survivor!<br>
<b>Seven. </b> Unless you are rich enough to try to go this alone,
you have to join together with others to make your voice heard.
Many voices together are loud enough to force those in power to
listen. Groups of people are far more effective than individual
voices. Neighborhood organizations, church organizations, community
organizations, join and work with others!<br>
<b>Eight. </b> Work in statewide coalitions. Statewide coalitions
are very important because many disaster relief decisions are made
on the state level. You have to be able to influence those
decisions.<br>
<b>Nine. </b>Identify members of Congress who you can work with.
Many decisions are being made on the federal level. You have to
make sure your voice is heard. After Katrina, the best voice for
poor people in New Orleans was Congresswoman Maxine Waters from
California! Now well known nationally as Superwoman, she was
terrific advocate for and with us.<br>
<b>Ten. </b> Prioritize the voices of women. Men push to the front
when the cameras are on and when the resources are being handed
out. But in the long run, it is usually the women who are the most
reliable family anchors.<br>
<b>Eleven. </b> Don't allow those in power to forget about the
people whose voices are never heard. People in nursing homes,
people in hospitals, the elderly, the disabled, children, the
working poor, renters, people of color, immigrants and prisoners.
There is no need to be a voice for the voiceless, because all these
people have voices, they are just not listened to. Help lift their
voices and their stories up because the voices of business and
industry and people with money and connections will do just fine.
It is our other sisters and brothers who are always pushed to the
back of the line. Stand with them as they struggle to reclaim their
rightful place.<br>
<b>Twelve. </b> Realize that you have human rights to return to your
community and to be made whole. Protect your human rights and the
human rights of others.<br>
Bill Quigley teaches law at Loyola University New Orleans and can be
reached at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:quigley77@gmail.com">quigley77@gmail.com</a>.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/09/15/warning-letter-to-harvey-and-irma-survivors-from-katrina-survivor/">https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/09/15/warning-letter-to-harvey-and-irma-survivors-from-katrina-survivor/</a></font><br>
<br>
<b><br>
</b><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2017/09/16/the-weekend-wonk-tony-seba-on-disruptive-energy-technologies/#more-49035">The
Weekend Wonk: Tony Seba on Disruptive Energy Technologies</a></b><br>
September 16, 2017<br>
Get coffee and get comfortable. Prepare to have mind blown.<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://youtu.be/2b3ttqYDwF0">Tony
Seba: Clean Disruption - Energy & Transportation</a><br>
Stanford University futurist Tony Seba spent the last decades
studying technological disruptions. He argues that the Electric
Vehicle, battery storage, and solar power, along with autonomous
vehicles, are a perfect example of a 10x exponential process which
will wipe fossil fuels off the market in about a decade.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://youtu.be/2b3ttqYDwF0">https://youtu.be/2b3ttqYDwF0</a><br>
The above is an hour. If you're in a hurry, or just want a taste –
see 8 minute piece below on solar energy. <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://youtu.be/0L0JAnACdyc">The
Solar Disruption - Why Fossil Fuels and Nuclear Will be Obsolete
by 2030</a><br>
This is a clip from Tony Seba's "Clean Disruption" keynote
presentation at the Swedbank Nordic Energy Summit in Oslo, Norway,
March 17th, 2016.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://youtu.be/0L0JAnACdyc">https://youtu.be/0L0JAnACdyc</a><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2017/09/16/the-weekend-wonk-tony-seba-on-disruptive-energy-technologies/#more-49035">https://climatecrocks.com/2017/09/16/the-weekend-wonk-tony-seba-on-disruptive-energy-technologies/#more-49035</a></font><br>
<br>
<b><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/17/press-regulator-censures-mail-on-sunday-for-global-warming-claims">Press
regulator censures Mail on Sunday for global warming claims</a><br>
</b>Claims in the Mail on Sunday that global warming data had been
exaggerated in order to secure the Paris climate change agreement
have been criticised by the UK's press regulator.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/17/press-regulator-censures-mail-on-sunday-for-global-warming-claims">https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/17/press-regulator-censures-mail-on-sunday-for-global-warming-claims</a></font><br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/16/climate/british-press-watchdog-climate-change.html">British
Press Watchdog Says Climate Change Article Was Faulty</a></b><br>
A self-policing group within the British news industry has forced
the tabloid The Mail on Sunday to acknowledge that an article it
published asserting that climate researchers in the United States
had manipulated data was inaccurate and misleading.<br>
A statement saying the news organization "failed to take care over
the accuracy of the article" was posted on The Mail on Sunday's
website early Sunday and was to appear in the print edition as well.<br>
Publication of the statement was required after the self-regulating
group, the Independent Press Standards Organization, ruled in favor
of a complaint that the article, which was published on Feb. 5, had
misrepresented the comments of a former scientist with the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration about a 2015 climate change
paper by a leading NOAA climate researcher, Thomas R. Karl, and
others.<br>
The Mail on Sunday, the statement said, also failed to correct
"significantly misleading statements" in the article, which was
written by David Rose and based on the claims of the former NOAA
scientist, John J. Bates. The press standards group, known as IPSO,
was expected to publish the full text of its ruling on its website.<br>
Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, a Republican who heads the
House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, tweeted at the
time that "NOAA sr officials played fast & loose w/data in order
2 meet politically predetermined conclusion on climate change."<br>
Mr. Smith, who previously had accused the Obama administration of
having a "suspect climate agenda," also wrote to NOAA seeking more
information on Mr. Karl's study, which he said raised questions "as
to whether the science at NOAA is objective and free from political
interference."<br>
<font size="-1" color="#666666"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/16/climate/british-press-watchdog-climate-change.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/16/climate/british-press-watchdog-climate-change.html</a></font><br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.commondreams.org/views/2017/09/15/duty-warn-and-dangerous-case-donald-trump"><br>
"A Duty to Warn" and the Dangerous Case of Donald Trump</a></b><br>
by Bill Moyers, Robert Jay Lifton<br>
Renowned psychiatrist says despite "Goldwater Rule," mental health
experts have unique responsibility when someone in power may be
dangerous.<br>
<i>There will not be a book published this fall more urgent,
important, or controversial than The Dangerous Case of Donald
Trump, the work of 27 psychiatrists, psychologists and mental
health experts to assess President Trump's mental health. They had
come together last March at a conference at Yale University to
wrestle with two questions. One was on countless minds across the
country: "What's wrong with him?" The second was directed to their
own code of ethics: "Does Professional Responsibility Include a
Duty to Warn" if they conclude the president to be dangerously
unfit?</i><br>
It is an old and difficult moral issue that requires a great
exertion of conscience. Their decision: "We respect the rule, we
deem it subordinate to the single most important principle that
guides our professional conduct: that we hold our responsibility to
human life and well-being as paramount."<br>
Hence, this profound, illuminating and discomforting book undertaken
as "a duty to warn."<br>
<b>Lifton: </b>Yes. And that's what I call malignant normality.
What we put forward as self-evident and normal may be deeply
dangerous and destructive. I came to that idea in my work on the
psychology of Nazi doctors - and I'm not equating anybody with Nazi
doctors, but it's the principle that prevails - and also with
American psychologists who became architects of CIA torture during
the Iraq War era. These are forms of malignant normality. For
example, Donald Trump lies repeatedly. We may come to see a
president as liar as normal. He also makes bombastic statements
about nuclear weapons, for instance, which can then be seen as
somehow normal. In other words, his behavior as president, with all
those who defend his behavior in the administration, becomes a norm.
We have to contest it, because it is malignant normality. For the
contributors to this book, this means striving to be witnessing
professionals, confronting the malignancy and making it known.<br>
<b>Moyers: </b>And that should apply to journalists, lawyers,
doctors -<br>
<b>Lifton:</b> Absolutely. One bears witness by taking in the
situation - in this case, its malignant nature - and then telling
one's story about it, in this case with the help of professional
knowledge, so that we add perspective on what's wrong, rather than
being servants of the powers responsible for the malignant
normality. We must be people with a conscience in a very fundamental
way.<br>
<b>Moyers: </b>And this is what troubled you and many of your
colleagues about the psychologists who helped implement the US
policy of torture after 9/11.<br>
<b>Lifton: </b>Absolutely. And I call that a scandal within a
scandal, because yes, it was indeed professionals who became
architects of torture, and their professional society, the American
Psychological Association, which encouraged and protected them until
finally protest from within that society by other members forced a
change. So that was a dreadful moment in the history of psychology
and in the history of professionals in this country.<br>
<b>Moyers: </b>Some of the descriptions used to describe Trump -
narcissistic personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder,
paranoid personality disorder, delusional disorder, malignant
narcissist - even some have suggested early forms of dementia - are
difficult for lay people to grasp. Some experts say that it's not
one thing that's wrong with him - there are a lot of things wrong
with him and together they add up to what one of your colleagues
calls "a scary witches brew, a toxic stew."<br>
<b>Lifton: </b>I think that's very accurate. I agree that there's
an all-enveloping destructiveness in his character and in his
psychological tendencies. But I've focused on what professionally I
call solipsistic reality. Solipsistic reality means that the only
reality he's capable of embracing has to do with his own self and
the perception by and protection of his own self. And for a
president to be so bound in this isolated solipsistic reality could
not be more dangerous for the country and for the world. In that
sense, he does what psychotics do. Psychotics engage in, or
frequently engage in a view of reality based only on the self. He's
not psychotic, but I think ultimately this solipsistic reality will
be the source of his removal from the presidency...<br>
So there is this apocalyptic influence in the Trumpean presidency:
The world is destroyed in order to be purified and renewed in the
ideal way that is projected by a Steve Bannon. And there is a sense
of that when Trump says we'll make America great again, because he
says it's been destroyed, he will remake it. So there is an
apocalyptic suggestion, but I don't think it's at the very heart of
his presidency.<br>
<b>Moyers: </b>So our challenge is?<br>
<b>Lifton: </b>I always feel we have to work both outside and
inside of our existing institutions, so we have to really be careful
about who we vote for and examine carefully our institutions and
what they're meant to do and how they're being violated. I also
think we need movements from below that oppose what this
administration and administrations like it are doing to ordinary
people. And for those of us who contributed to this book - well, as
I said earlier, we have to be "witnessing professionals" and fulfill
our duty to warn.<br>
See more at:<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.commondreams.org/views/2017/09/15/duty-warn-and-dangerous-case-donald-trump">https://www.commondreams.org/views/2017/09/15/duty-warn-and-dangerous-case-donald-trump</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
FFEWS Global | Global Weather Hazards<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.fews.net/global/global-weather-hazards/september-15-2017">Sudan,
Nigeria, parts of Guinea, and Sierra Leone remain at risk for
flooding</a></b><br>
The Global Weather Hazards report anticipates severe weather or
climate events in Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and
Central Asia. This product provides maps with current weather and
climate information; short and medium range weather forecasts (up to
one week); and the potential impact on crop and pasture conditions.
It does not reflect long range forecasts or food security
conditions.<br>
download: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.fews.net/sites/default/files/documents/reports/Global%20Weather%20Hazard-17.09.14.pdf">http://www.fews.net/sites/default/files/documents/reports/Global%20Weather%20Hazard-17.09.14.pdf</a><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.fews.net/global/global-weather-hazards/september-15-2017">http://www.fews.net/global/global-weather-hazards/september-15-2017</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=547886265">(NPR
Audio) Anab Jain: Can A Glimpse Of Tomorrow, Change Our
Decisions Today?</a></b><br>
And I think, you know, the real challenge here is to understand
where power lies - because once we begin to understand that, we can
understand it in relation to our powerlessness and that actually
every individual does have some power. We do have the power of our
voice, of our work, of the decisions we make, of the things we
choose not to buy. I think it's just because those small actions
have not been quantified to mean anything. But they do.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=547886265">http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=547886265</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<i>[2 years ago - but still important]</i><br>
<b><a href="https://vimeo.com/123754997">(video) Lecture by climate
psychiatrist Professor Paul Hoggett</a></b><br>
"The catastrophic consequences of climate change are without
precedent for humanity. Paul Hoggett asks, how can we think in a
realistic way about something whose implications are unthinkable?
This is not about being morbid or apocalyptic. Only by being fully,
mindfully, awake to the facts and emotions can the real adaptive
work begin to increase resilience. And there is much work to do.<br>
All else is perilous time-wasting pretence."<br>
Paul Hoggett is Professor of Politics and Director of the Centre for
Psycho-Social Studies at the University of the West of England,
Bristol. He is a psychoanalytic psychotherapist and group relations
consultant.<font size="-1"><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.resilience.org/stories/2014-10-07/trapped-in-techno-scientism-is-this-hindering-our-becoming-an-eco-city/">http://www.resilience.org/stories/2014-10-07/trapped-in-techno-scientism-is-this-hindering-our-becoming-an-eco-city/</a></font><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://vimeo.com/123754997">https://vimeo.com/123754997</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a
href="http://variety.com/2017/film/news/paul-schrader-first-reformed-toronto-film-festival-1202560593/">Paul
Schrader on the Extinction of the Human Race and His New Film
'First Reformed'</a></b><br>
It's no surprise that Paul Schrader, a filmmaker associated with
such dark classics as "Taxi Driver" and "American Gigolo," has a
pessimistic streak. But it's still bracing to hear him argue that
humanity, as we know it, is unlikely to last through the next
century.<br>
In an interview at the Toronto Film Festival, Schrader said he
believes that global warming is accelerating at such a rate that
there's little that can be done to arrest the ecological changes.
His Cassandra-like streak informs "First Reformed," his new drama
that's been screening to strong reviews at the fall festivals. The
film grapples with issues of faith while also sounding a warning
about the destruction of the natural world. It follows Ethan Hawke
as a small-town priest who toys with becoming a suicide bomber in
the service of a radical form of environmentalism. Schrader spoke to
Variety about religion in film, working with Hawke, and why he
believes the world will be well rid of the human race.<b><br>
</b><b>Your film doesn't just grapple with faith. It's also about
the environment. What interested you about that topic?</b><br>
We have this contemporary crisis of ecology, which takes all the
historic, philosophic questions of meaning and puts them in
boldface. Man has always wondered whether life has any meaning and
what comes after death. Now that we can sort of see the end of the
role in the physical world the questions have an added urgency.<br>
<b>You've been screening the picture at Toronto and other festivals
as the U.S. is being buffeted by Hurricanes Irma and Harvey. Does
that drive the point home more for you?</b><br>
I wouldn't isolate these events. They're part of the new normal.
It's not just hurricanes. The icebergs are falling into the seas.
California's on fire. It's an accelerating process.<br>
I would think that homo sapiens as we know them will not outlive
this century. When they create a great museum of the animal world,
hopefully the filmmakers will get a room.<br>
<b>That's a very pessimistic view. Is there any reason to be hopeful
or are we just screwed?</b><br>
Anyone who is hopeful is simply not paying attention. There may have
been a reason to be hopeful ten or 15 years ago, but we've played
our hand now. We've indicated what our priorities are. Our
priorities are our immediate comforts and not the existence of
future generations. I don't think intelligent life will end with
humans. There may even be moral life after humans. But we have more
or less soiled our nest. The universe will be well rid of us.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://variety.com/2017/film/news/paul-schrader-first-reformed-toronto-film-festival-1202560593/">http://variety.com/2017/film/news/paul-schrader-first-reformed-toronto-film-festival-1202560593/</a></font><br>
<b><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6053438/">IMDB First
Reformed (2017)</a></b><br>
A former military chaplain is wracked by grief over the death of his
son. Mary is a member of his church whose husband, a radical
environmentalist, commits suicide, setting the plot in motion.<br>
<font size="-1">First Reformed presents a true account of modern
times. The protagonist, a relatively young priest, is faced with
the dilemma of either following the word of Jesus or welcoming the
economic benefits that being complacent with a polluting
international company will bring to his church. The film is full
of profound thoughts, which are very true about the aim of
institutions, their core purpose and the difficulty in having a
wisdom capable of balancing and believing in the coexistence of
opposing values, at the same time. There is also a subtle critique
about the "new age" or "new economy" philosophy of optimism and
abundance, at all costs, as if belonging to such groups could
provide the adept with a magic pill that relives from thinking
about modern injustices and global challenges.</font><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6053438/">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6053438/</a></font><br>
<b><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7qcaanbUK0">(YouTube)
Ethan Hawke, Amanda Seyfried about First Reformed, John Brown,
protesting</a></b><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7qcaanbUK0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7qcaanbUK0</a></font><br>
<b><a href="https://youtu.be/TaO2Af5xrBM">(YouTube) Ethan Hawke,
Amanda Seyfried abour her child and the earth slowly dying,
First Reformed</a><br>
</b><font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://youtu.be/TaO2Af5xrBM">https://youtu.be/TaO2Af5xrBM</a></font><b><br>
<a href="https://youtu.be/zoDRFfxomoQ">(YouTube) Paul Schrader,
Ethan Hawke and Amanda Seyfried - FIRST REFORMED - 74 Venice
Film Festival</a></b><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://youtu.be/zoDRFfxomoQ">https://youtu.be/zoDRFfxomoQ</a></font><br>
<b><a href="https://youtu.be/LeEMlGR4sjQ">(YouTube) Ethan Hawke
talks about FIRST REFORMED at Venice Film Festival 2017</a></b><br>
Actor Ethan Hawke attends a press conference for his film FIRST
REFORMED where he discusses the question of faith and why he didn't
become a priest in real life.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://youtu.be/LeEMlGR4sjQ">https://youtu.be/LeEMlGR4sjQ</a><br>
</font><br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.nationalmemo.com/moniz-mccarthy-fight-off-climate-change-deniers-at-house-hearing/">This
Day in Climate History September 18, 2006</a> - from D.R.
Tucker</b></font><br>
September 18, 2006: Air America's "EcoTalk with Betsy Rosenberg"
becomes the first radio show focused on green/climate change issues
to go to a daily format in 40 markets.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blogsofbainbridge.typepad.com/ecotalkblog/2006/09/ecotalk_daily_s.html">http://blogsofbainbridge.typepad.com/ecotalkblog/2006/09/ecotalk_daily_s.html</a><br>
September 18, 2013: The House Energy and Power Subcommittee holds a
hearing on the Obama administration's climate-change efforts,
featuring testimony from EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and Energy
Secretary Ernest Moniz.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nationalmemo.com/moniz-mccarthy-fight-off-climate-change-deniers-at-house-hearing/">http://www.nationalmemo.com/moniz-mccarthy-fight-off-climate-change-deniers-at-house-hearing/</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://youtu.be/TEVQb8toc5M">http://youtu.be/TEVQb8toc5M</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><i>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i> </i></font><font
size="+1"><i> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="a%20href=%22mailto:contact@theClimate.Vote%22">Subscribe</a>
to this mailing. </i></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><small>. </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
</small><small> </small><br>
<small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes. </small><br>
<small>To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
with subject: subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject:
unsubscribe</small><br>
<small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may
subscribe/unsubscribe at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small>
</small><br>
<small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels.</small><small> L</small><small>ist
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</small></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>