<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><i>October 5, 2017</i></font><br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/353563-oxfam-steps-in-to-help-puerto-rico-slamming-us-response-as-slow">Oxfam
slams U.S. response in Puerto Rico as "slow, inadequate" -
"Clean water, food, fuel, electricity, and health care are in
desperately short supply and quickly dwindling" </a></b><br>
(The Hill) - Oxfam America is stepping in to help Puerto Rico,
saying the Trump administration's response has been "inadequate."<br>
The global nonprofit's president, Abby Maxman, said in a statement
Tuesday that the group is "outraged" at the U.S. government's slow
response in Puerto Rico, where more than half of the population is
without clean drinking water and food and electricity are scarce in
the wake of Hurricane Maria.<br>
"We're hearing excuses and criticism from the administration instead
of a cohesive and compassionate response," Maxman said.<br>
The organization primarily focuses on humanitarian aid in developing
nations and rarely helps wealthy countries like the U.S., but it
said it is making an exception as the situation in Puerto Rico
worsens.<font size="-1">...<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/353563-oxfam-steps-in-to-help-puerto-rico-slamming-us-response-as-slow">http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/353563-oxfam-steps-in-to-help-puerto-rico-slamming-us-response-as-slow</a></font><br>
-<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.oxfamamerica.org/press/statement-by-oxfam-america-president-abby-maxman-regarding-puerto-rico-hurricane-response/">Statement
by Oxfam America President Abby Maxman regarding Puerto Rico
Hurricane Response</a></b><br>
2 October 2017 (Oxfam) - In response to the US Government's
continued failure to adequately respond, and ahead of President
Trump's planned trip to Puerto Rico, Oxfam America President Abby
Maxman said:<br>
"Oxfam has monitored the response in Puerto Rico closely, and we are
outraged at the slow and inadequate response the US Government has
mounted in Puerto Rico. Clean water, food, fuel, electricity, and
health care are in desperately short supply and quickly dwindling,
and we're hearing excuses and criticism from the administration
instead of a cohesive and compassionate response. The US has more
than enough resources to mobilize an emergency response but has
failed to do so in a swift and robust manner. Oxfam rarely responds
to humanitarian emergencies in the US and other wealthy countries,
but as the situation in Puerto Rico worsens and the federal
government's response continues to falter, Oxfam has decided to step
in to lend our expertise in dealing with some of the world's most
catastrophic disasters."...<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.oxfamamerica.org/press/statement-by-oxfam-america-president-abby-maxman-regarding-puerto-rico-hurricane-response/">https://www.oxfamamerica.org/press/statement-by-oxfam-america-president-abby-maxman-regarding-puerto-rico-hurricane-response/</a><br>
</font><br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://phys.org/news/2017-10-flights-worldwide-severe-turbulence-due.html">Flights
worldwide face increased risk of severe turbulence due to
climate change</a></b><br>
Flights all around the world will be encountering lots more
turbulence in future, according to the first ever global projections
of in-flight bumpiness.<br>
A new study led by the University of Reading has calculated that
climate change will significantly increase the amount of severe
turbulence worldwide by 2050 - 2080. Severe turbulence involves
forces stronger than gravity, and is strong enough to throw people
and luggage around an aircraft cabin.<br>
Flights to the most popular international destinations are projected
to experience the largest increases, with severe turbulence at a
typical cruising altitude of 39,000 feet becoming up to two or three
times as common throughout the year over the North Atlantic (+180
percent), Europe (+160 percent), North America (+110 percent), the
North Pacific (+90 percent), and Asia (+60 percent).<br>
"Air turbulence is increasing across the globe, in all seasons, and
at multiple cruising altitudes. This problem is only going to worsen
as the climate continues to change. Our study highlights the need to
develop improved turbulence forecasts, which could reduce the risk
of injuries to passengers and lower the cost of turbulence to
airlines."<br>
The expected turbulence increases are a consequence of global
temperature changes, which are strengthening wind instabilities at
high altitudes in the jet streams and making pockets of rough air
stronger and more frequent.<br>
YouTube video <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://youtu.be/ErNPXJv9GsU">Climate change makes flight
times longer</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://youtu.be/ErNPXJv9GsU">https://youtu.be/ErNPXJv9GsU</a><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://phys.org/news/2017-10-flights-worldwide-severe-turbulence-due.html">https://phys.org/news/2017-10-flights-worldwide-severe-turbulence-due.html</a></font><br>
- much more:<br>
Prof Alice Bows-Larkin's expert evidence on aviation and climate
change<br>
Below is Bows-Larkin's expert witness statement to the trial of the
"Heathrow 13" in full, exactly as it was submitted to the judge.<br>
It's a detailed account of where the aviation industry sits
alongside UK domestic and international law, and is worth reading in
full.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/heathrow-13-prof-alice-bows-larkins-expert-evidence-on-aviation-and-climate-change">https://www.carbonbrief.org/heathrow-13-prof-alice-bows-larkins-expert-evidence-on-aviation-and-climate-change</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://ohsonline.com/articles/2017/09/15/insurance-harder-to-find.aspx">Insurance
Harder to Find in Fire-Affected Areas of Washington State</a></b><br>
Some property insurers are not selling policies in wildfire-affected
areas, Washington State Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler pointed
out in a Sept. 13 blog post.<br>
Sep 15, 2017<br>
Some property insurers are not selling policies in wildfire-affected
areas, Washington State Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler pointed
out in a Sept. 13 blog post. His post on the official blog of the
Washington state Insurance Commissioner's office said some property
insurers have temporarily stopped selling insurance in areas
affected by the Eagle Creek, Norse Peak, and Jolly Mountain fires in
the state.<br>
"If you are in the process of buying real estate or if your
homeowner insurance policy is up for renewal, you may have a hard
time finding a policy," he explained, recommending that residents
facing this contact their agent or broker and ask what their options
are.<font size="-1"><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ohsonline.com/articles/2017/09/15/insurance-harder-to-find.aspx">https://ohsonline.com/articles/2017/09/15/insurance-harder-to-find.aspx</a></font><br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://nwnewsnetwork.org/post/some-property-insurers-pulling-back-highest-wildfire-risk-areas">(radio
report) Some Property Insurers Pulling Back From Highest
Wildfire Risk Areas</a></b><br>
... insurance companies would be acting irresponsibly if they did
not pay attention to trends of increasing wildfire frequency and
intensity and adjust their risk exposure accordingly.<br>
"Those are decisions companies have to make to continue to provide
products and services," Brine said in an interview Tuesday.<br>
The tally of homes lost to Pacific Northwest wildfires ran into the
hundreds a couple years ago, but insured damages appear much lower
this year.
<br>
Brine said there are literally hundreds of companies that have a
certificate to write property insurance in Washington state alone.
He acknowledged that being non-renewed "can be jarring news for a
consumer, but they have many other options open to them."<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://nwnewsnetwork.org/post/some-property-insurers-pulling-back-highest-wildfire-risk-areas">http://nwnewsnetwork.org/post/some-property-insurers-pulling-back-highest-wildfire-risk-areas</a><br>
</font>-<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-miller-zinke-fire-memo-20171001-story.html">Op-Ed
What the Trump administration doesn't understand about wildfires<br>
</a></b> Its key wildfire officials — Interior Secretary Ryan
Zinke, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue and EPA Administrator
Scott Pruitt — have refused to acknowledge the primary role that
dangerous climatological factors, such as drought, heat and wind,
play in energizing and propelling wildland fire. Instead, they're
fingering "radical environmentalists" who allegedly have scuttled
timber sales that would have removed trees and reduced ignition
sources.<br>
The Trump triumvirate made these claims at a news conference that
used the 53,000-acre Lolo Peak fire in Montana as a dramatic
backdrop. Perhaps they were unaware that the forest around Lolo Peak
had been repeatedly logged in recent years, and that didn't prevent
it from erupting in flame. "Large fires are not like campfires,"
ecologists Dominick DellaSala and Timothy Ingalsbee observe. "They
are mainly driven by extreme weather conditions, not fuels."<br>
When Zinke returned to Washington, he continued to ignore fire
science in a memo he sent to Interior land-management staff. Among
wildland experts, the directive was read as a rebuke to anyone
arguing that climate change is what's creating a "new normal" of
larger, more dangerous and erratic fires.<br>
Back at Lolo Peak, Zinke had revealed his real intention: to gut the
regulatory authority of the National Environmental Policy Act. Zinke
and crew tipped their hand when they argued against the act's
requirement for rigorous environmental-impact reports and its
principled insistence on public input and oversight. Their goal is
to privilege resource extraction over recreation, wildlife
protection and climate-change mitigation, which may well result in
less resilient forests and, of all things, more fire. President
Nixon, who in 1970 signed NEPA into law, would be stunned by this
effort to strip his landmark legislation's environmental and
democratic protections.<br>
Zinke's position is that NEPA is preventing the Forest Service from
cutting down trees, and hence it's adding to the number and
intensity of wildland conflagrations.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-miller-zinke-fire-memo-20171001-story.html">http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-miller-zinke-fire-memo-20171001-story.html</a><br>
</font><br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/04/a-lack-of-action-on-climate-change-is-putting-peoples-lives-at-risk">A
lack of action on climate change is putting people's lives at
risk</a></b><br>
A new study warning Australia's major cities are likely to reach
highs of 50C <i>(122 degrees F) </i>by 2040 - even if the world
meets its target of limiting warming to 2C above pre-industrial
levels - is yet more evidence that without immediate and urgent
action we are facing a looming public health crisis during heatwaves
and other extreme weather events.<br>
The study follows recent unseasonable heat across New South Wales,
with Sydney experiencing its hottest ever September day, as well as
the doubling of record-breaking summer temperatures in Australia in
the past 50 years. This new normal has hospital health professionals
particularly bracing for the coming summer.<br>
Public Australian emergency departments are tough places to both
work and be a patient. They are hectic, often overwhelmed, not
infrequently threatening environments that are emotionally demanding
for everyone. And, with ever increasing demand and an ageing
population, along with a politically-sensitive health budget, the
emergency department is increasingly the public face of a stressed
health system.<br>
Every day, sometime around 11am, the ambulances roll in. This is
when we see the presentation rate suddenly increase, commonly
bringing a new patient every three to four minutes, a rate that will
continue until 10-11pm every evening. Generally during this 11 to 12
hour period we see two-thirds of our presentations. This is the time
that the department heaves.<br>
During this period, on any given day, the resuscitation area will be
full. A delirious elderly patient with septicaemia will be lying
alongside someone with chest pain who may be next to a psychotic
methamphetamine-intoxicated patient screaming abuse as they are
restrained by security and clinical staff, while a full
resuscitation of an out of hospital cardiac arrest or a major trauma
takes place in a nearby bay.<br>
Now let us add to this day three of a heatwave (defined as three or
more days of high maximum temperatures). With climate change causing
a gradual increase in average temperatures, we know that heatwaves
are more frequent and of increasing severity.<br>
What we also know from the heatwaves we have seen in Australia thus
far is that we can expect a very significant impact on our public
health system. Increases of up to 25% for ambulance emergency call
outs; up to 60% increase in emergency department resuscitation
cases, often in the elderly and vulnerable members of our society;
an overall increase in presentations to our already overstretched
emergency departments; and an increase in overall deaths ranging
from 13% to 24%. In the 2014 Melbourne heatwave, that equated to 167
excess deaths.<br>
One hundred and sixty seven deaths. If that had been a fire, or
explosion, or heaven forbid a terrorist attack, it would be a
national disaster that would be in the public eye for days. Yet it
will happen reliably with every major heatwave event, and we barely
bat an eyelid.<br>
These issues are discussed in an article in the current edition of
the Medical Journal of Australia, which I co-authored with former
Australian of the Year, Professor Fiona Stanley, and public health
physician, Dr Marion Carey.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/04/a-lack-of-action-on-climate-change-is-putting-peoples-lives-at-risk">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/04/a-lack-of-action-on-climate-change-is-putting-peoples-lives-at-risk</a></font><br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2017/207/6/extreme-heat-threatens-health-australians">Extreme
heat threatens the health of Australians</a></b><br>
Marion G Carey, Mark P Monaghan and Fiona J Stanley<br>
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (6): 232-234. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00511<br>
Heatwaves have serious health impacts and we need a better approach
to prevention and management<br>
Last year was the world's hottest on record, with anthropogenic
global warming raising average temperatures about 1°C above
pre-industrial levels.<br>
Even small increases in the average temperature influence extremes
of hot weather. Heatwaves are becoming hotter, longer and more
frequent, and are increasing the risk of bushfires. <br>
The number of record hot days in Australia has doubled in the past
50 years, and marine heatwaves are causing severe coral bleaching
in the Great Barrier Reef.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2017/207/6/extreme-heat-threatens-health-australians">https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2017/207/6/extreme-heat-threatens-health-australians</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/07/10/koch-fueling-us-forward-america-rising-squared-bashing-electric-cars">Koch-funded
Group, Fueling US Forward, Echoes America Rising Squared in
Misleading Attack on Electric Cars</a></b><br>
video <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_WscmJSB2c">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_WscmJSB2c</a><br>
<a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/fueling-us-forward"
target="_blank">Fueling <span class="caps">U.S.</span> Forward</a>,
the Koch-funded campaign to "rebrand" fossil fuels as "positive" and
"sustainable," has released <a
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_WscmJSB2c" target="_blank">a
new video attacking the "Dirty Secrets of Electric Cars," </a>signaling
a possible strategic pivot from straightforward fossil fuel
cheerleading to electric vehicle (<span class="caps">EV</span>) and
clean energy bashing. <br>
The video and accompanying <a
href="https://fuelingusforward.com/dirty-secrets-electric-cars/"
target="_blank">Dirty Secrets of Electric Cars web page</a>
feature blatant factual errors, misleading statements, and glaring
omissions (all of which will be debunked thoroughly below), while
essentially attacking electric cars for using the same
materials needed to manufacture cell phones, laptops, defense
equipment, and gas-powered cars, and which are even a critical
component of the very oil refining processes that form the
foundation of the Koch fortunes.<br>
When Fueling <span class="caps">U.S.</span> Forward launched last
August, the organization's president <a
href="http://www.kochvsclean.com/charles-drevna/" target="_blank">Charles
Drevna</a> described the campaign as an effort to rebrand fossil
fuels by focusing on the "positive" aspects of coal, oil, and gas.
This <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_WscmJSB2c"
target="_blank">newly released video</a> seems to further confirm
investigative journalist <a
href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/koch-electric-vehicles_us_56c4d63ce4b0b40245c8cbf6"
target="_blank">Peter Stone's reporting from last spring</a> that
the Kochs were "plotting a multimillion dollar assault on
electric vehicles."<br>
How do we know that Fueling <span class="caps">U.S.</span> Forward
is this Koch-funded campaign? First, Charles Drevna, who is leading
the effort, developed the concept while serving as a Distinguished
Senior Fellow at the <a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/institute-energy-research"
target="_blank">Institute for Energy Research</a>, a pro-fossil
fuel think tank that was partially founded by Charles Koch and that
is run by a <a href="http://www.kochvsclean.com/thomas-pyle/"
target="_blank">longtime lobbyist for Koch Industries</a>. Second,
and more concretely, <a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2016/08/14/new-koch-back-campaign-rolled-out-red-state-gathering-aims-promote-positives-fossil-fuels"
target="_blank">Drevna told DeSmog's Sharon Kelly</a> that he was
working with <a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/koch-industries-inc"
target="_blank">Koch Industries</a>' board member (and longtime
Koch brothers' confidant) <a
href="http://www.kochvsclean.com/james-mahoney/" target="_blank">James
Mahoney</a> on the campaign and that it was funded by "one of
the brothers."...<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/07/10/koch-fueling-us-forward-america-rising-squared-bashing-electric-cars">https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/07/10/koch-fueling-us-forward-america-rising-squared-bashing-electric-cars</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.buzzfeed.com/zahrahirji/how-climate-myths-spread-online">Here's
Why Debunking Viral Climate Myths Is Almost Impossible, In One
Animated Chart</a></b><br>
A British newspaper admitted that a controversial climate article
from February was misleading and inaccurate. The story's claims have
received at least 752,300 shares, likes, comments, or other
interactions on social media.<br>
When a British newspaper published an<span> </span><a
href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent;
text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">expose'</a><span>
</span>in February alleging proof that US government scientists had
used flawed data to show recent global warming and rushed to publish
their research to sway the Paris climate talks, conservative media
was lit.<br>
"The latest example of misinformation from the left comes directly
from the federal government,"<span> </span><a
href="https://www.sarahpalin.com/2017/02/05/busted-government-just-got-caught-big-global-warming-lie/"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent;
text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">SarahPalin.com
said</a><span> </span>about the article, published in Britain's<span> </span><a
href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent;
text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Mail on
Sunday</a>. It was a "<a
href="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/02/04/bombshell-noaa-whistleblower-says-karl-et-al-pausebuster-paper-was-hyped-broke-procedures/"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent;
text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">bombshell,"
according to</a><span> </span>the climate skeptic blog Watts Up
With That, and "<a
href="http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/noaa-caught-red-handed-manipulating-data-to-make-global-warming-seem-worse"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent;
text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">explosive</a>,"
according to The Federalist Papers Project. "<a
href="https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/noaa-climate-change-data-leaders/"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent;
text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">BUSTED:
NOAA Lied About Climate Change Data to Manipulate World Leaders</a>,"
blared the website Louder with Crowder.<br>
The story centered on a two-year-old Science<span> </span><a
href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/348/6242/1469"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent;
text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">study</a><span> </span>showing
that the rise in global temperatures had not recently stalled, as
previous data had suggested. The Science paper had repeatedly<span> </span><a
href="https://www.buzzfeed.com/danvergano/congressman-launches-subpoena-battle-with-climate-scientists?utm_term=.pxD5yRppG8#.yl4RMzbbN8"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent;
text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">been
attacked</a><span> </span>by climate skeptics, including House
Science Committee chair Lamar Smith (R-Tex.). After the Mail on
Sunday's piece, Smith<span> </span><a
href="https://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/02.14.17%20SST%20Letter%20to%20Acting%20Administrator%20Friedman.pdf"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent;
text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">demanded</a>,<span> </span>for
at least the<span> </span><a
href="https://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/NOAA%20Karl%20Study%20One-Pager.pdf"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent;
text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">sixth time</a>,
that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration turn over
its correspondence about the Science data.<br>
Now, some seven months later, the Mail on Sunday has<span> </span><a
href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent;
text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">begrudgingly
admitted</a><span> </span>its story was wrong. But will this
update change anyone's minds?...<br>
The story, published on February 4 and updated on September 16, has
received more than 211,500 shares, likes, comments, or other
interactions on social media, according to our analysis of online
traffic data collected as of September 27 by the website Buzzsumo. <br>
Another 159 stories repeated the original's claims and linked back
to it, and received about 540,800 shares or interactions. This
includes coverage from conservative news giants such as Fox News,
Breitbart, Daily Caller, and National Review, as well as by climate
skeptic blogs.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.buzzfeed.com/zahrahirji/how-climate-myths-spread-online">https://www.buzzfeed.com/zahrahirji/how-climate-myths-spread-online</a></font><br>
<br>
<b><br>
</b><b><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://youtu.be/F0UkH81NMTo">(Satire)
Coal Lobby Warns Wind Farms May Blow Earth Off Orbit...lmao</a></b><br>
Panelists debate whether the U.S. is doing enough to heed the
warnings of coal industry scientists who say turbines could blow the
Earth right into the sun (video)<br>
"Earth's orbit all life depends on it a little closer to the Sun
will burn up a<br>
little farther away we'll freeze..But wind farmers want to install
thousands<br>
of propellers onto the earth and propellers make things move we like
this<br>
planet... let's not blow it away"<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://youtu.be/F0UkH81NMTo">https://youtu.be/F0UkH81NMTo</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://youtu.be/99-v2Farbjs">This Day in Climate History
October 5, 1988 </a> - from D.R. Tucker</b></font><br>
October 5, 1988: Texas Senator Lloyd Bentsen (D) and Indiana Senator<br>
Dan Quayle (R) discuss global warming in the Vice Presidential
debate,<br>
with both men agreeing that the problem must be addressed during the<br>
next four years; Bentsen suggests that natural gas and ethanol might<br>
be alternatives to oil dependence. (49:33-52:45)<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://youtu.be/99-v2Farbjs">http://youtu.be/99-v2Farbjs</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><i>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i> </i></font><font
size="+1"><i> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="a%20href=%22mailto:contact@theClimate.Vote%22">Send
email to subscribe</a> to this mailing. </i></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><small>. </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
</small><small> </small><br>
<small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes. </small><br>
<small>To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
with subject: subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject:
unsubscribe</small><br>
<small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may
subscribe/unsubscribe at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small>
</small><br>
<small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels.</small><small> L</small><small>ist
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</small></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>