<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><i>November 27, 2017<br>
</i></font> <br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/robert-lifton-climate_us_5a186457e4b0649480742c6b">A
Star Psychiatrist Swerves From Nuclear Armageddon To Climate
Change</a></b><br>
Robert Jay Lifton studied Nazi doctors and the threat of nuclear
annihilation. But global warming changed everything.<br>
At 91 years old, he has arrived at his most daunting subject yet:
climate change. In his latest book, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.amazon.com/Climate-Swerve-Reflections-Mind-Survival/dp/1620973472/ref=sr_1_1">The
Climate Swerve</a>, Lifton examines humanity's struggle to
understand what's happening, how to deal with it, and why powerful
people and institutions sabotage attempts to avoid destruction of
the planet.<br>
"The climate threat is the most all-encompassing threat that we
human beings face," Lifton said in an interview last month...<br>
"I consider the climate swerve a movement toward the recognition of
climate danger and what I call species awareness ― awareness of
ourselves as a single species in deep trouble," Lifton said. "The
swerve is toward that recognition, that consciousness."<br>
Of course there's climate rejection and denial all over the world.
The U.S. seems to be unique in that a major party which now holds
power in most areas is committed to rejecting a fundamental truth
that endangers human civilization. ... In that way, and in many
others, one can say that Republican leaders and Trump in particular
may be the most dangerous men in the world.<br>
There are many villains. Before Trump, the Republican Party had had
a pretty consistent climate rejection position. Trump embraced that
position, carried it to greater extremity in his cabinet
appointments, more than was expected, and then you have the
philanthropists like the Koch brothers and others who finance it....<br>
I would add to that such climate villains are helped by a general
tendency in human thought to resist the idea that nature can turn on
us. There is strongly the idea that nature will protect us, nature
represents growth. That sense, often a vague one, can contribute to
elements of resistance to the idea that the climate can change in
ways that are threatening to us.....<br>
… If we were to carry on now simply as we are, in these mixtures of
capitalist greed and failure to act and the enormous, exaggerated
exploitation of fossil fuels, if we were to carry on and change
nothing over a period of decades, within the century we would do
ourselves in. We don't have to do anything to change, just do what
we were doing. I call this the ultimate absurdity.<br>
With nuclear weapons, you've got to build the weapons. You got to
actually use them in a nuclear war, maybe create nuclear winter
which could result in death of all people on planet, but you have to
bring in these objects and set them off. You don't have to do
anything like that with climate. Just do as we've been doing....<br>
With climate, climate normality was in the everyday practice. We
were born into climate normality. This is the world which we entered
and in which we live now and which continues. If we allow it to
continue as it is now, it will result in the end of human
civilization within the present century. I came to the idea of
malignant normality that has to be exposed for its malignancy.
Intellectuals and professionals have a particular role, what I call
witnessing professionals, bear witness to the malignancy, the
danger, of what's being put forward to us as normal and as the only
way to behave. That's happening more but we need a lot of additional
expression of resistance on the part of intellectuals in protest and
activism...<br>
Bearing active witness against malignant normality in climate,
nuclear threat or anything else, requires protest and activism. I
believe in the combination of scholarship and activism and have
tried to live by that in my own work.<br>
I'm hopeful enough to believe that the climate swerve will far
outlive this administration. The climate swerve is something that
takes on a much longer life. It's only taking shape now and
beginning. It's a larger wave of feeling and belief and
consciousness and awareness that will last for generations. Each
generation will need to estimate, examine climate danger and the
embrace of a version of the climate swerve that does the maximum
amount to combat that danger...<br>
I see the climate swerve as lasting for a very long time with ebbs
and flows and problems, but not being ended in any sense within the
foreseeable future. In that sense, that's not a form of wild
optimism but that is an expression of some hope in relation to the
human future and our struggle with climate.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/robert-lifton-climate_us_5a186457e4b0649480742c6b">https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/robert-lifton-climate_us_5a186457e4b0649480742c6b</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/nov/24/oil-pipeline-valve-turner-protest-climate-change">
<b>I shut down an oil pipeline - because climate change is a
ticking bomb</b></a><br>
Emily Johnston<br>
Normal methods of political action and protest are simply not
working. If we don't reduce emissions boldly and fast, that's
genocide<br>
A little over a year ago, four friends and I shut down all five
pipelines carrying tar sands crude oil into the United States by
using emergency shut-off valves. As recent months have made clear,
climate change is not only an imminent threat; it is an existing
catastrophe. It's going to get worse, and tar sands oil - the
dirtiest oil on Earth - is one of the reasons.<br>
We did this very, very carefully - after talking to pipeline
engineers, and doing our own research. Before we touched a thing, we
called the pipeline companies twice to warn them, and let them turn
off the pipelines themselves if they thought that was better; all of
them did so.<br>
I'm heartened by the way the law can be supple - not a thing that,
once set, holds that exact shape forever (or we'd still have
slavery, and I couldn't vote or marry), but a thing that responds -
slowly - to our evolving understanding of what is just and true.<br>
When it comes to climate change, there's little enough to feel
heartened by, so I'll take it.<br>
<font size="-1">Emily Johnston is a poet and co-founder of
350Seattle.org. She will face trial starting 11 December on felony
charges for shutting the emergency valve on the Enbridge tar sands
pipeline in Leonard, Minnesota, together with her co-defendant
Annette Klapstein. The charges carry maximum penalties of some 20
years in prison and fines up to $40,000. </font><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/nov/24/oil-pipeline-valve-turner-protest-climate-change">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/nov/24/oil-pipeline-valve-turner-protest-climate-change</a></font><br>
-<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/05/05/do-climate-activists-have-a-legal-justification-for-civil-disobedience/">Do
Climate Activists Have a Legal Justification for Civil
Disobedience?</a></b><br>
by Ted Hamilton - Bill Quigley<br>
As the Trump administration reverses federal action to combat
climate change in the midst of unprecedented warming, climate
activists are gearing up for a new wave of civil disobedience and
direct action.<br>
In recent years, climate protesters have sat in at the White House,
blocked oil trains, and hung off of oil vessels. Such tactics
secured (temporary) victories in the Keystone XL and Standing Rock
conflicts, and have helped jump-start the growth of a new social
movement.<br>
But with the U.S. still on track to miss its commitment to the Paris
Agreement's target of 2 degrees Celsius warming, many climate
protesters are attempting to extend their struggle to the courtroom.
Arguing that their acts of civil disobedience were justified by the
government's failure to adequately address global warming, they seek
acquittals based upon the common law defense of necessity.<br>
The so-called "climate necessity defense" has not met with much
judicial success in American courts thus far.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/05/05/do-climate-activists-have-a-legal-justification-for-civil-disobedience/">https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/05/05/do-climate-activists-have-a-legal-justification-for-civil-disobedience/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.wnyc.org/story/on-the-media-2017-11-24/">On the
Media "Apocalypse, Now" Podcast WNYC </a></b><br>
Nov 23, 2017<br>
Science fiction has always been an outlet for our greatest
anxieties. This week, we delve into how the genre is exploring the
reality of climate change. Plus: new words to describe the
indescribable.<br>
1. Jeff VanderMeer [@jeffvandermeer], author of the <i>Southern
Reach Trilogy</i> and <i>Borne</i>, on writing about the
relationships between people and nature.<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.wnyc.org/story/otm-when-science-fiction-isnt-fiction">When
Science Fiction Isn't Fiction</a> 12 min <br>
2. Claire Vaye Watkins [@clairevaye] talks about <i>Gold Fame
Citrus,</i> her work of speculative fiction in which an enormous
sand dune threatens to engulf the southwest. <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.wnyc.org/story/otm-desert-reasserts-itself">The
Desert Reasserts Itself </a> 11 min <br>
3. Kim Stanley Robinson discusses his latest work, <i>New York 2140</i>.
The seas have risen 50 feet and lower Manhattan is submerged. And
yet, there's hope.<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.wnyc.org/story/otm-our-future-cities">Kim Stanley
Robinson on Our Future Cities</a> 12 min <br>
4. British writer Robert Macfarlane [@RobGMacfarlane] on new
language for our changing world. <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.wnyc.org/story/otm-whats-in-name">"Solastalgia,"
and Other Words for Our Changing World</a> 12 min <br>
Throughout the show: listeners offer their own new vocabulary for
the Anthropocene era. Many thanks to everyone who left us voice
memos! <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.wnyc.org/story/on-the-media-2017-11-24/">http://www.wnyc.org/story/on-the-media-2017-11-24/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.hakaimagazine.com/features/death-killer-algae/">Death
by Killer Algae</a></b><br>
When 343 sei whales died from a harmful algal bloom in Chilean
Patagonia, they opened a window into the effect changing climate is
having on marine mammals, our oceans, and us.<br>
by Claudia Geib <br>
They didn't think much of the first dead whale. Dwarfed by the
rugged cliffs of Patagonia's high green fjords, the team of
biologists had sailed into a gulf off the Pacific Ocean searching
for the ocean's smaller animals, the marine invertebrates they were
there to inventory. That night, while hunting for an anchorage in a
narrow bay, the team spotted a large, dead whale floating on the
water's surface...<br>
As the team of five researchers from Chile's Huinay Scientific Field
Station sailed south across the Golfo de Penas, the dead were there,
too: 200 kilometers away, they found four more whales on the beaches
of the exposed, outer coast. At one point, someone's dog rolled in
one of the corpses. The scent of dead whale hung in the boat for
weeks.<br>
"Everybody was clear about it - this is not normal," says Vreni
Häussermann, director of Huinay station and the leader of the group
that made the discovery in April 2015. Häussermann and her team
found themselves drawn into a whodunit worthy of a detective show:
they'd become accidental witnesses to a mass killing. But what had
caused it, and just how many had fallen victim? ..<br>
By the end of the second day, after bad weather moved in and forced
the airsick group to the ground, they knew they had something big on
their hands...<br>
Based on size, shape, and species known to frequent the region, the
team posited that at least 343 of the dead were sei whales, the
third-largest species of baleen whale and an endangered species. It
was the largest baleen whale mortality ever recorded<br>
That unusually warm water in the Golfo de Penas was a major clue in
solving the mystery of the whales' deaths, and it reflected an event
of global magnitude...warm water and a boost of nutrients - algae
can grow so explosively that those toxins become a problem, creating
what's called a harmful algal bloom, or HAB. The toxins end up in
filter feeders, such as shellfish, which draw algae out of the
water, and in the stomachs of zooplankton and other small animals
that feed on algae. As larger animals eat these organisms, algal
toxins get passed up the food chain...<br>
From January 2015 through June 2016, the planet experienced an El
Nino: a period in which easterly winds across the Pacific Ocean
weaken, allowing warm water to flow into the space between Oceania
and South America...<br>
The weather associated with El Nino and its effects are well
documented: unusual rainfall in the Peruvian desert, droughts in
Indonesia and Australia, and disastrous drops in South American fish
populations, to name just a few. Only in the past few decades has
another trend emerged: HABs, which seem to coincide with the changes
in water temperature and nutrient availability brought on by El
Nino.<br>
Two whales, as well as mussels sampled just after the initial 2015
Patagonia stranding, tested positive for both domoic acid and
paralytic shellfish toxin (PST), which can cause muscle paralysis in
mammals. Phytoplankton also tested positive for PST at the mouth of
Seno Newman, a long fjord near the Golfo de Penas where 149 of the
dead whales were found.<br>
The El Ninos most often linked with these HABs are cyclic,
infrequent events. Yet years' worth of dogged work around the world
suggests that HABs aren't just an occasional occurrence; they are
increasingly becoming regular events, and are even called the "new
normal" for certain areas.<br>
On a warming planet, this killer has an accomplice.<font size="-1"><br>
This article is also available in audio format. Listen now,
download, or subscribe to "Hakai Magazine Audio Edition" through
your favorite podcast app.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.hakaimagazine.com/features/death-killer-algae/">https://www.hakaimagazine.com/features/death-killer-algae/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://thinkprogress.org/delhi-smog-diplomats-89e0f18beadc/">Diplomats
flee Delhi amid worsening smog crisis</a></b><br>
The solution to the problem, however, isn't that simple.<br>
Delhi's staggering pollution levels have begun to push out diplomats
and spark international upheaval. But experts say diplomatic exodus
won't solve the larger issue facing the developing and heavily
industrialized city.<br>
"Air moves - from outside the city into it and vice versa. Some of
the policy instruments that are most effective for reducing
emissions - cleaner fuel standards, for example - are well
beyond city policy jurisdictions."<br>
"Leaving has become more public and socially acceptable - not just
among expatriates, but among those with the means and flexibility to
do so," Seddon said. "There are widespread calls to shut schools
during the extreme episodes, so that parents can take their kids
out, and those who can often do leave for part of the [smog]
'season.'"<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://thinkprogress.org/delhi-smog-diplomats-89e0f18beadc/">https://thinkprogress.org/delhi-smog-diplomats-89e0f18beadc/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://theconversation.com/why-meeting-the-paris-climate-goals-is-an-existential-threat-to-fossil-fuel-industries-85225">Why
Meeting the Paris Climate Goals Is an Existential Threat to
Fossil Fuel Industries</a></b><br>
<b>Attacks on climate policies are not really about the science.
They're about the future of fossil fuels. </b><br>
Any program with a reasonable chance of meeting the goals embraced
by the <a
href="https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/international/negotiations/paris_en">2016
Paris accords</a> (holding global temperature increases below 1.5
to 2 degrees Celsius compared to preindustrial levels) is likely to
mean drastic changes in fossil energy markets. <br>
And the task is only getting harder. After three years of leveling
off, global greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels are projected
to grow 2 percent in 2017 to a <a
href="https://theconversation.com/fossil-fuel-emissions-hit-record-high-after-unexpected-growth-global-carbon-budget-2017-87248">new
record high</a>. <br>
I have spent much of my career heading <a
href="https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/9/5/951311a2-4b4b-4006-8411-27c76b5796f5/01AFD79733D77F24A71FEF9DAFCCB056.finaltestimony.pdf">federal
programs designed to foster alternatives to fossil fuels</a>. When
I look at what it would take to avoid the temperature rise agreed to
in <a
href="https://theconversation.com/why-is-climate-changes-2-degrees-celsius-of-warming-limit-so-important-82058">the
Paris Agreement</a>, it's clear that meeting these goals is an
existential threat to fossil fuel industries. <br>
Carbon dioxide stays in the atmosphere for decades, so its climate
impact depends on the total volume of emissions over the years.
We've already added about <a
href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NGEO3031">three-quarters of the
cumulative amounts</a> that would lead to a 1.5 degree increase. <br>
It is still <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo3031.epdf">technically
possible</a> to keep total volumes of greenhouse gases below the 2
degree level if we start an aggressive climate program immediately.
But the only credible strategies for meeting the goals that do not
include dramatic near-term reductions in fossil fuel emissions
involve enormous projects to remove carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere....<br>
The most benign of these involve capturing carbon in plants and
soils. While improved agricultural and forestry practices will be an
important part of any climate strategy, systems capable of
offsetting current fossil emissions through soil and plants would
need to use <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870">massive
amounts of productive land, water and nutrients</a>.<br>
In 2009 the U.S. and other "group of eight" countries agreed that
meeting long-term climate goals meant that they should reduce their
greenhouse gas emissions by at <a
href="https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/mid_century_strategy_report-final.pdf">least
80 percent by 2050</a>. Even with optimistic assumptions about
innovative agricultural policies, meeting the 80 percent reduction
goal would mean reducing U.S. carbon dioxide emissions - most of
which is released by burning fossil fuels - by <a
href="https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/mid_century_strategy_report-final.pdf">70
to 85 percent</a>....<br>
Many of these jobs will be in jeopardy if we meet climate goals.
However, I believe any losses in employment will be more than offset
by rapid growth in low-carbon industries, including energy
efficiency, nuclear, renewables, and natural gas plants that capture
and sequester CO2. Employment in these areas is already <a
href="https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/01/f34/2017%20US%20Energy%20and%20Jobs%20Report_0.pdf">about
2.75 million</a>, and the numbers are increasing rapidly.<br>
It is also likely that the new "energy infrastructure" investments
will create large numbers of new jobs in areas such as new electric
vehicle charging systems; "smart grid" electric systems that
integrate renewable energy sources, microgrids, <a
href="https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia861/dsm/">efficiency
technologies</a> and grid-level storage. Also, new infrastructure
will be needed to retrofit and build new industrial and building
systems that use electricity or other clean energy sources instead
of fossil fuels. The jobs created to meet U.S. and international
markets for these technologies are often attractive and well-paying.
<br>
This of course is a poor solace to people now employed in fossil
fuel businesses. Any sensible policy driving the shift from fossil
fuels must include a strategy for facilitating their transition to
the new economy and the funding needed to make it work. The
transition may not be as graceful for the fossil industry itself.
And they know it.<br>
Henry Kelly, Senior Scientist, Michigan Institute for Data Science,
University of Michigan <br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://theconversation.com/why-meeting-the-paris-climate-goals-is-an-existential-threat-to-fossil-fuel-industries-85225">https://theconversation.com/why-meeting-the-paris-climate-goals-is-an-existential-threat-to-fossil-fuel-industries-85225</a></font><br>
<br>
(history 1990)<b><br>
</b><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2017/11/25/the-weekend-wonk-stephen-schneider-from-1990/">The
Weekend Wonk: Stephen Schneider from 1990</a></b><br>
November 25, 2017<br>
Treasure from Climate State. Stephen Schneider in 1990, presentation
in Aspen - the climate debate and greenhouse science is well
developed, and much like what we still discuss today.<br>
First 5 minutes or so is intro. <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://youtu.be/IiP9VFmep4c">https://youtu.be/IiP9VFmep4c</a>
<br>
<blockquote><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://youtu.be/IiP9VFmep4c">(video) Climate scientist
Stephen Schneider talks climate change.</a></b><br>
Dr. Stephen Schneider is one of the most notable and outspoken
scientists on the topic of climate change. His moderate and
scientific approach to explaining climate change has helped
congressmen, journalists, and citizens understand the complex, and
often contradictory, issues related to global warming. In this
ever timely talk, Dr. Schneider goes over the many different
portrayals of climate change in the media and explains how to
distinguish hype from science. <br>
He argues that in order to have a functional democracy, voters
must understand the basics of these important issues so that they
can make informed decisions. This talk is part of the Walter Orr
Roberts Public Lecture Series presented by the Aspen Global Change
Institute. Recorded in Aspen, CO on July 30, 1990.<br>
Release via <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://archive.org/details/Agci-TheGlobalWarmingDebateScienceOrPolitics477">https://archive.org/details/Agci-TheGlobalWarmingDebateScienceOrPolitics477</a><br>
</blockquote>
Extremely interesting discussion of pre-economic explosion China,
false balance in media, forest fires, methane and agriculture,
science consensus, drought and hydrological change, greenhouse
amplification, "loading the dice", economic and social projections,
and climate model projections for the future. (which means now)<br>
Yeah, Schneider pretty much nailed it, 27 years ago.<br>
He may have overestimated the ability of deniers to change in
response to data.<br>
Climate State <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXy9Efp5QoTGGxmpKBujLLQ">has
been doing an absolutely amazing job</a> of providing a useful
historical archive of important experts warning on climate issues
through past decades.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2017/11/25/the-weekend-wonk-stephen-schneider-from-1990/">https://climatecrocks.com/2017/11/25/the-weekend-wonk-stephen-schneider-from-1990/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/27/us/without-passing-a-single-law-obama-crafts-bold-enviornmental-policy.html">This
Day in Climate History November 27, 2014 </a>- from D.R.
Tucker</b></font><br>
November 27, 2014:<br>
The New York Times reports:<br>
"President Obama could leave office with the most aggressive,<br>
far-reaching environmental legacy of any occupant of the White
House.<br>
Yet it is very possible that not a single major environmental law
will<br>
have passed during his two terms in Washington.<br>
"Instead, Mr. Obama has turned to the vast reach of the Clean Air
Act<br>
of 1970, which some legal experts call the most powerful
environmental<br>
law in the world. Faced with a Congress that has shut down his<br>
attempts to push through an environmental agenda, Mr. Obama is using<br>
the authority of the act passed at the birth of the environmental<br>
movement to issue a series of landmark regulations on air pollution,<br>
from soot to smog, to mercury and planet-warming carbon dioxide."<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/27/us/without-passing-a-single-law-obama-crafts-bold-enviornmental-policy.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/27/us/without-passing-a-single-law-obama-crafts-bold-enviornmental-policy.html</a><br>
<font size="+1"><i><br>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i>Please forward this email<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html">Archive
of Daily Global Warming News</a> </i></font><i><br>
</i><span class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a></span><font
size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i><br>
</i></font></i></font><font size="+1"><i> <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="a%20href=%22mailto:contact@theClimate.Vote%22">Send
email to subscribe</a> to this mailing. </i></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><small> </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
</small><small> </small><br>
<small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes. </small><br>
<small>To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
with subject: subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject:
unsubscribe</small><br>
<small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may
subscribe/unsubscribe at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small>
</small><br>
<small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels.</small><small> L</small><small>ist
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</small></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>