<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><i>November 28, 2017<br>
</i></font> <br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/11/28/how-to-persuade-people-that-climate-change-is-real/?utm_term=.20dd7e52c369">How
to persuade people that climate change is real</a></b><br>
By Alexander Maki November 28 <br>
Here are five insights from the young but growing body of research
on climate change communication.<br>
<b>1. The messenger matters</b><br>
matching messenger to audience leads to more effective
messages...people are more likely to believe climate science when it
is discussed by meteorologists.<br>
<b>2. People respond to appeals based on their values</b><br>
...research suggests that tailoring messages to fit the audience’s
values can make people more willing to believe climate science.<br>
<b>3. Educating people about the science can make a difference</b><br>
Educating people that there’s a broad scientific consensus about
climate change may make people... more likely to believe it exists.
What’s not so clear is whether metaphors or narratives can help
people appreciate the nuances of the climate science.<br>
<b>4. Emphasizing risk may spur people to action</b><br>
...when people experience extreme weather or have noticed changes in
the local weather, they are more likely to believe that climate
change is occurring. <br>
<b>5. Affirming the power of the people</b><br>
..when individuals and communities feel that they can help mitigate
climate change, they’re more likely to act...People are also likely
to feel more engaged and effective when they have tools to combat
misinformation and misunderstanding about climate change.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/11/28/how-to-persuade-people-that-climate-change-is-real/">https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/11/28/how-to-persuade-people-that-climate-change-is-real/</a></font><br>
-<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/03/21/climate/how-americans-think-about-climate-change-in-six-maps.html"><b>How
Americans Think About Climate Change, in Six Maps</b></a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/03/21/climate/how-americans-think-about-climate-change-in-six-maps.html">https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/03/21/climate/how-americans-think-about-climate-change-in-six-maps.html</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.theactuary.com/features/2017/09/climate-risk-going-mainstream/">Climate
risk: going mainstream</a></b><br>
The governor of the Bank of England and ExxonMobil shareholders are
just some of those changing the narrative on climate risk, says
Dylan Tanner<br>
Once climate change becomes a defining issue for financial
stability, it may already be too late<br>
Data, analysis and advice on climate risk to portfolios have been
around and available to investors for at least 20 years. By the late
1990s, the UN Environment Program (UNEP) Financial Initiative was
messaging regularly on the risk of climate-change-induced weather
events to the insurance sector and hence the wider markets...<br>
In 2000, the investor-enabled Climate Disclosure Project (CDP) began
collecting and aggregating carbon emissions information from
thousands of companies around the globe. Financial data sets such as
MSCI, Thomson Reuters Eikon and Bloomberg create and sell
climate-related metrics on companies as part of their environment,
social and governance (ESG) offering...<br>
One of the largest such funds is Norway's Government Pension Fund
Global, with close to $1trn in assets. It adopted criteria in late
2015, allowing it to "exclude companies whose conduct to an
unacceptable degree entails greenhouse gas emissions". ..<br>
In the climate risk context, this process will spur the financial
research and data sectors to acquire expertise, and perhaps to form
unusual alliances with climate specialists in the NGO, academic and
technology sectors, to better understand the nuances of portfolio,
sector and company risk.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.theactuary.com/features/2017/09/climate-risk-going-mainstream/">http://www.theactuary.com/features/2017/09/climate-risk-going-mainstream/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.priweb.org/publications/pubdetails.php?pubID=5813&back=catID%3D51%26buy%3D2">The
Teacher-Friendly Guide to Climate Change</a></b><br>
Author: Ingrid H. H. Zabel; Don Duggan-Haas and Robert M. Ross<br>
Year: 2017 <br>
Pages: 284<br>
ISBN: 978-0-87710-519-0<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.priweb.org/files/pubtext/TFG-ClimateChange-Complete.pdf">Download
full PDF version</a><br>
The interactive online version of this Teacher-Friendly Guide is at
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://teacherfriendlyguide.org">http://teacherfriendlyguide.org</a><br>
Notes:<br>
The Teacher-Friendly Guide™ to Climate Change is the newest addition
to our Teacher-Friendly series. This book includes both the basics
of climate change science and perspectives on teaching a subject
that has become socially and politically polarized. The focus
audience is high school Earth science and environmental science
teachers, and it is written with an eye toward the kind of
information and graphics that a secondary school teacher might need
in the classroom. Print copies are available for purchase here and a
PDF version is available above as a free download.<br>
Teach Climate Science is a fundraiser designed to distribute TFG
Climate Change nationwide. Help us spread the word by donating on
our fundraiser page. You can also visit our blog, where the TFG
Climate Change PDF is presented chapter by chapter and where we are
also posting resources about climate change and science education<br>
<blockquote> Note<br>
Due to significant recent interest, we have exhausted our initial
supply of printed copies of The Teacher-Friendly Guide to Climate
Change. Do not worry - more have been ordered and we will be
receiving a new supply soon. Please feel free to place your order
now. As soon as our new shipment arrives, we will send you your
order, with expected delivery in early December. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to ask: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:publications@museumoftheearth.org">publications@museumoftheearth.org</a>.<br>
</blockquote>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.priweb.org/publications/pubdetails.php?pubID=5813&back=catID%3D51%26buy%3D2">http://www.priweb.org/publications/pubdetails.php?pubID=5813&back=catID%3D51%26buy%3D2</a></font><br>
-<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/11/26/teacher-friendly-guide-climate-change-heartland-institute-anti-science-propaganda">Here's
the Teacher-Friendly Antidote to Heartland Institute's
Anti-Science School 'Propaganda'</a></b><br>
By Ashley Braun Sunday, November 26, 2017 <br>
On a Monday morning at the end of October, <a
href="https://www.priweb.org/research.php?page=702670/cv_ross"
target="_blank">Rob Ross</a> asked a group of earth scientists and
educators a question: How many of them had received copies of the <a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/heartland-institute"
target="_blank">Heartland Institute</a> book <em>Why Scientists
Disagree About Global Warming</em>?<br>
You could feel an immediate sense of frustration in the air. Roughly
half of them raised their hands. The Heartland Institute is a
Chicago-based think tank that rejects the scientific consensus that
humans are changing the climate and has received funding from the
conservative billionaire Koch brothers and fossil fuel industry.<br>
In March, it mailed, unsolicited, a 135-page book and accompanying <span
class="caps">DVD</span> <a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/06/10/us-senators-warn-education-department-heartland-institute-possibly-fraudulent-science-teachers-mailing"
target="_blank">to tens of thousands of science teachers</a> at
public high schools across the U.S., with plans to keep that up
until the report was in the hands of every last one.<br>
While it received swift backlash - including from Democratic
senators, Heartland's most recent effort (<a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2013/11/07/heartland-tries-poison-classrooms-partisan-climate-pseudoscience"
target="_blank">though not its first</a>) to spread climate
science denial in public schools had a somewhat fortuitous timing.
Ross and his colleagues at the <a
href="http://www.priweb.org/index.php?" target="_blank">Paleontological
Research Institution</a> were putting the finishing touches on
their own book for science educators, <em><a
href="http://www.priweb.org/publications/pubdetails.php?pubID=5813&back=catID%3D51%26buy%3D2"
target="_blank">The Teacher-Friendly Guide to Climate Change</a></em>....<br>
<em>The Teacher-Friendly Guide</em> already had 11 chapters covering
everything from the evidence and causes of climate change to the
obstacles in addressing and reasons for teaching it. Adding a final
chapter, written by <a
href="https://www.priweb.org/outreach.php?page=edstaff/edalexmoore"
target="_blank">Alexandra Moore</a>, in the form of frequently
asked questions (<span class="caps">FAQ</span>) seemed like the
best approach....<br>
While they don't explicitly mention the Heartland teacher mailing in
the <span class="caps">FAQ</span>, Duggan-Haas pointed out, "The
first question of the <span class="caps">FAQ</span> chapter is 'Is
there a consensus among climate scientists that global warming is
occurring and that humans are the cause?'"<br>
In keeping with best practices for science communication,
Duggan-Haas said they didn't want to trigger the "<a
href="https://skepticalscience.com/Debunking-Handbook-Part-2-Familiarity-Backfire-Effect.html"
target="_blank">backfire effect</a>," a phenomenon that may occur
when trying to correct misinformation.<br>
<span class="dquo">"</span>We're trying to avoid restating the myth
in a way that would reinforce it," he said.<br>
Ross agreed: "We did not dwell on the Heartland Institute, even in
the <span class="caps">FAQ</span>, but we did try to make sure we
addressed some of the most important points that the Heartland
Institute was making in their propaganda."<br>
In its <span class="caps">FAQ</span>, the Paleontological Research
Institution's teacher guide answers 18 questions touching on common
climate science denier points, including <a
href="https://skepticalscience.com/climate-models.htm"
target="_blank">why we can trust the proven reliability of
computer climate models</a> and why humans, rather than <a
href="https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-natural-cycle.htm"
target="_blank">natural variation</a> or <a
href="https://skepticalscience.com/solar-activity-sunspots-global-warming.htm"
target="_blank">the sun</a>, are the most likely explanation for
observed global warming.<br>
One of the questions, "Are people who are arguing that global
warming is happening being alarmists?" is a likely reference to the
derogatory term, "alarmist," frequently used by the Heartland
Institute and other climate denier organizations...<br>
While <em>The Teacher-Friendly Guide</em> doesn't mention the
Heartland Institute's propaganda sent to teachers, it does call out
the science-denying think tank by name. Question 16 in the <span
class="caps">FAQ</span> reads like this: "Climate websites refer
to both the <span class="caps">IPCC</span> and, more recently, the
<span class="caps">NIPCC</span>. What is the difference between
these two organizations?"..<br>
<span class="dquo">"</span>The 'Nongovernmental International Panel
on Climate Change' is sponsored by the Heartland Institute, a
U.S.-based conservative think tank best known for fighting
government regulation of the tobacco and fossil fuel industries.
Heartland has campaigned to downplay threats posed by second-hand
smoke, acid rain, and ozone depletion, as well as against the
Endangered Species Act. The Heartland <span class="caps">NIPCC</span>
also issues periodic reports, timed to coincide with the release of
<span class="caps">IPCC</span> assessment reports and formatted to
look like them. <span class="caps">NIPCC</span> reports are
authored by fewer than 50 individuals and the most recent report
cites only 72 papers, mostly written by the <span class="caps">NIPCC</span> authors."<br>
The National Center for Science Education <a
href="https://ncse.com/files/nipcc.pdf" target="_blank">handily
debunks the <span class="caps">NIPCC</span></a> - and <a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2013/09/17/international-climate-science-coalition-s-lacks-credibility"
target="_blank">so has DeSmog</a>.<br>
Published in May, <em><a
href="http://www.priweb.org/publications/pubdetails.php?pubID=5813&back=catID%3D51%26buy%3D2"
target="_blank">The Teacher-Friendly Guide to Climate Change</a></em>
has its work cut out for it. Ross says their plan is "to send a
guide to every high school in the country with <span class="caps">CD</span>s
for every teacher in the high school."<br>
And they're <a
href="https://www.givegab.com/nonprofits/paleontological-research-institution-and-its-museum-of-the-earth-and-cayuga-nature-center/campaigns/climate-change-challenge"
target="_blank">crowdfunding to raise more money</a>, on top of
their original National Science Foundation grant, in order to pull
that off...he acknowledged that <a
href="http://munews.missouri.edu/news-releases/2017/0607-climate-change-misconceptions-common-among-teachers-study-finds/"
target="_blank">American science teachers, generally and
unsurprisingly, reflect the knowledge and attitudes</a> of the
broader American public on climate change.<br>
Still, six months after the first release of <em>The
Teacher-Friendly Guide to Climate Change</em>, it seems to be in
high demand: the paperback version ($25 each) has already run out
until early December. But anyone can access a <a
href="http://www.priweb.org/publications/pubdetails.php?pubID=5813&back=catID%3D51%26buy%3D2"
target="_blank">free <span class="caps">PDF</span> of The Teacher
Friendly Guide online</a> right now.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/11/26/teacher-friendly-guide-climate-change-heartland-institute-anti-science-propaganda">https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/11/26/teacher-friendly-guide-climate-change-heartland-institute-anti-science-propaganda</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://seekingalpha.com/article/4127708-climate-change-adaptation-antifragile-portfolio">Climate
Change Adaptation: The Antifragile Portfolio</a></b><br>
Summary<br>
Ethical investors like plays on energy efficiency, renewable energy,
sustainable transport or organic food.<br>
These are strong trends, but they require others to change their
behaviour.<br>
Therefore, prudent investors may want to consider bets on
adjustments forced upon people.<br>
Here are five suggestions.<br>
Different views on climate change<br>
People think very differently about climate change:<br>
Some are in die-hard denial,<br>
some accept there is climate change, but say they are not sure about
its causes,<br>
some accept climate change is caused by humans, but are too lazy or
fatalistic to do something about it<br>
and then there are activists.<br>
Despite all talk I very much doubt there are many denialists among
investors. Otherwise these contrarians would buy coastal dream
properties or farmland in increasingly dry regions at a discount. I
do not see any of that happen. If anything, denialism serves as a
tool to protect short-term business interests (cf. Real estate
industry blocks sea-level warnings that could crimp profits on
coastal properties).<br>
At the other end of the spectrum I have been spending my time in the
activist camp which is pretty deserted as well. Yes, the financial
industry is offering an ever-growing number of SRI, ESG and
'Sustainable' labelled products, but a brief look under the hood
shows that this is often no more than marketing. Therefore, it seems
fair to conclude that it is the groups 2 and 3 that are dominating
the market....<br>
People cannot opt out of climate change. Its consequences will be
experienced by all four groups mentioned above. Thus, prudent
sustainable investors may want to make sure they have some exposure
to businesses that will benefit from adjustments forced upon people
by climate change.<br>
<font size="-2"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://seekingalpha.com/article/4127708-climate-change-adaptation-antifragile-portfolio">https://seekingalpha.com/article/4127708-climate-change-adaptation-antifragile-portfolio</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/11/warming-is-accelerating.html">Warming
is accelerating</a></b><br>
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2017<br>
Warming is accelerating. For some time, it has been warmer than the
1.5 degrees C guardrail that the Paris Agreement promised should not
be crossed. This conclusion follows from above analysis of NASA
land+ocean data 1880-October 2017, adjusted by 0.59 degrees C to
cater for the rise from preindustrial and with a trend added that
also indicates that the global temperature look set to cross the 2
degrees C guardrail soon, with 2021 falling within the margins of
the trend line.<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0KgSwjS8qDs/WhfZO6--qTI/AAAAAAAAYHQ/RCWGBiuwznMq2GbROG1QnIibDCZ6_IK2wCLcBGAs/s320/Ocean-warming.png">[
click images to enlarge ]</a><br>
The trend line shows a strong and ominous direction upward.
Nonetheless, the situation could be even more dire than this trend
indicates, since some warming elements are not fully incorporated in
these data.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/11/warming-is-accelerating.html">http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/11/warming-is-accelerating.html</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-a-rogue-nation-alter-clouds-to-combat-warming/">Could
a Rogue Nation Alter Clouds to Combat Warming?</a></b><br>
Two experiments have sparked an international debate over
geoengineering<br>
Plans for two experiments to potentially slow global warming by
deploying tiny particles into the atmosphere have sparked an
international debate over whether such tests should be allowed
without some form of government scrutiny.<br>
The experiments are being planned by scientists who worry that the
U.S. government, and others, is not equipped to move fast enough to
mitigate greenhouse gases before the world reaches dangerous
"tipping points." Those stages of planetary change could accelerate
the heating effect, perhaps to life-threatening levels, they say.<br>
Those involved in the debates are split about the experiments, being
planned at the University of Washington and Harvard University. Dr.
V. "Ram" Ramanathan, a professor of atmospheric and climate sciences
at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography at the University of
California, San Diego, is an author of a study released this fall at
the United Nations in an attempt to enlarge the discussion of
potential climate disasters (Climatewire, Sept. 15).<br>
Plans for two experiments to potentially slow global warming by
deploying tiny particles into the atmosphere have sparked an
international debate over whether such tests should be allowed
without some form of government scrutiny.<br>
The experiments are being planned by scientists who worry that the
U.S. government, and others, is not equipped to move fast enough to
mitigate greenhouse gases before the world reaches dangerous
"tipping points." Those stages of planetary change could accelerate
the heating effect, perhaps to life-threatening levels, they say.<br>
Those involved in the debates are split about the experiments, being
planned at the University of Washington and Harvard University. Dr.
V. "Ram" Ramanathan, a professor of atmospheric and climate sciences
at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography at the University of
California, San Diego, is an author of a study released this fall at
the United Nations in an attempt to enlarge the discussion of
potential climate disasters (Climatewire, Sept. 15)....<br>
entists at the University of Washington, like at Harvard, have
brought people from a number of other departments into discussions
about the proposed experiments. Stephen Gardiner, a professor of
philosophy at the University of Washington, has even gotten a book
out of it: "A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate
Change."<br>
"Some people suggest that we wait so we can make foolproof tests
that don't backfire on us," Gardiner said. "There isn't going to be
any magical way of doing this that benefits absolutely everybody
across the planet." On the other hand, he said, "no country wants to
be on the nasty end of this."<br>
"Who makes the call?" he asked. "Who is in charge?"<br>
Gardiner fears what he calls a huge intergenerational problem. There
is an older generation that might be lulled into thinking it should
wait for a perfect climate solution. Gardiner believes it resembles
the British in their hopes for appeasement in the years before Nazi
Germany ignited World War II.<br>
Then there is the younger generation, including the students whom he
pushes to mull over the ethics of geoengineering in his philosophy
classes. He gives them the "Captain Kirk test," after James T. Kirk,
the fictional spaceship commander on "Star Trek." The series has
kept international audiences in thrall over science fiction drama
for more than 50 years.<br>
"I always ask my classes, what would they do if Captain Kirk shows
up with technologies from hundreds of years in the future that have
been successfully tested and you knew exactly how to fine-tune them,
and the alternative was climate change?" Gardiner said.<br>
"I find most people would be willing to give Captain Kirk a
hearing," he added. "But a big problem is that we're nowhere near
the world of Captain Kirk. And it is not at all clear that we can
get there fast enough to make these big technological interventions
relevant to the problem that we face."<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-a-rogue-nation-alter-clouds-to-combat-warming/">www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-a-rogue-nation-alter-clouds-to-combat-warming/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</font><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.sciencenews.org/article/climate-foiled-europeans-early-exploration-north-america">Climate
foiled Europeans' early exploration of North America</a></b><br>
'A Cold Welcome' examines how the Little Ice Age and other factors
shaped colonial history<br>
... explorations occurred during a time of global cooling known as
the Little Ice Age, which stretched from the 13th to early 20th
centuries. The height of exploration may have occurred at the peak
of cooling: Starting in the late 16th century, a series of volcanic
eruptions likely chilled the Northern Hemisphere by as much as 1.8
degrees Celsius below the long-term average, White says.<br>
This cooling gave Europeans an especially distorted impression of
their new lands. For instance, not long after Spanish explorer
Sebastián Vizcaíno landed in California's Monterey Bay in December
1602, men's water jugs froze overnight - an unlikely scenario today.
Weather dissuaded Spain from further attempts at colonizing
California for over a century.<br>
Harsh weather also heightened conflict when underprepared Europeans
met Native Americans, whose own resources were stretched thin by
unexpectedly bad growing seasons.<br>
A Cold Welcome is organized largely by colonial power, which means
findings on climate are repeated in each chapter. But White's
synthesis of climate and history is novel, and readers will see
echoes of today's ignorance about the local consequences of climate
change. "Human psychology may be both too quick to grasp at false
patterns and yet too slow to let go of familiar expectations," White
writes.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.sciencenews.org/article/climate-foiled-europeans-early-exploration-north-america">https://www.sciencenews.org/article/climate-foiled-europeans-early-exploration-north-america</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/28/opinion/28victor.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0">This
Day in Climate History November 28, 2010 </a> - from D.R.
Tucker</b></font><br>
November 28, 2010: In a New York Times article, Veerabhadran<br>
Ramanathan of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and David G.<br>
Victor of the University of California, San Diego discuss the need
to<br>
make progress on climate change.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/28/opinion/28victor.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/28/opinion/28victor.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0</a><br>
<font size="+1"><i><br>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html">Archive
of Daily Global Warming News</a> </i></font><i><br>
</i><span class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a></span><font
size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i><br>
</i></font></i></font><font size="+1"><i> <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="a%20href=%22mailto:contact@theClimate.Vote%22">Send
email to subscribe</a> to this mailing. </i></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><small> </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
</small><small> </small><br>
<small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes. </small><br>
<small>To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
with subject: subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject:
unsubscribe</small><br>
<small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may
subscribe/unsubscribe at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small>
</small><br>
<small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels.</small><small> L</small><small>ist
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</small></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>