<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><i>January 17, 2018</i></font><br>
<br>
[letters to Trump]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/16012018/military-climate-change-bipartisan-congress-letter-national-defense-strategy">106
Lawmakers Urge Trump: Restore Climate Change in National
Security Strategy</a></b><br>
The bipartisan letter says that as global temperatures become more
volatile and sea levels rise, military installations and communities
are increasingly at risk.<br>
Phil McKenna<span
id="docs-internal-guid-c8e1fc81-003e-b115-7f31-1a7d19b2b402"></span><br>
<span id="docs-internal-guid-c8e1fc81-003e-b115-7f31-1a7d19b2b402">A
bipartisan group of more than 100 members of Congress is urging
President<span> </span><a
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/tags/donald-trump">Donald
Trump</a><span> </span><span></span>to recognize climate change
as a national security threat.</span><br>
<span id="docs-internal-guid-c8e1fc81-003e-b115-7f31-1a7d19b2b402">U.S.
Reps. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) and Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.)<span> </span><a
href="http://langevin.house.gov/sites/langevin.house.gov/files/documents/01-11-18_Langevin_Stefanik_Letter_to_POTUS_Climate_Change_National_Security_Strategy.pdf">wrote
a letter</a><span> </span><span></span>to the president signed
by 106 members of Congress on Thursday in response to the
administration's failure to mention the risks of<span> </span><a
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/topic/climate-change">climate
change</a><span> </span><span> </span>in its National Security
Strategy, released last month. Eleven Republicans signed the
letter, including members of the House Armed Services, Foreign
Affairs and Intelligence committees...</span><br>
The lawmakers urged the president to "reconsider this omission" in
the National Security Strategy.<br>
David Titley, a retired rear admiral who is director of the Center
for Solutions to Weather and Climate Risk at Penn State, said "facts
on the ground" including the recent fires in California and the
devastating Atlantic hurricane season are moving the needle in
Congress, which he sees as a key driver for addressing climate
change.<br>
"Really, the long game is what Congress thinks," Titley said.
"Administrations come and go, but Congress passes laws and has a
checkbook."<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/16012018/military-climate-change-bipartisan-congress-letter-national-defense-strategy">https://insideclimatenews.org/news/16012018/military-climate-change-bipartisan-congress-letter-national-defense-strategy</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Exxon Defense]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/01/16/exxon-continues-first-amendment-defense-climate-fraud-probes/">Exxon
Continues First Amendment Defense in Climate Fraud Probes</a></b><br>
By Karen Savage<br>
Exxon continues to cry foul, alleging that two state attorneys
general are violating its First Amendment right to express its
opinion on climate change.<br>
In a brief filed last week in New York, attorneys for Exxon once
again asserted that that investigations by Massachusetts Attorney
General Maura Healey and New York Attorney Eric Schneiderman are
part of a politically motivated conspiracy against the company and
an attempt to silence the oil giant through intimidation.<br>
The filing was the latest effort by Exxon to thwart investigations
by the attorneys general into possible climate change-related
deception by the company...<br>
In its most recent brief, attorneys for Exxon said the attorneys
general are targeting Exxon with "burdensome" and "harassing"
investigations because of the company's views on climate change.
Attorneys also link Healey and Schneiderman to climate activists who
Exxon says are seeking to "harass perceived political opponents" and
"delegitimize" Exxon.<br>
Attorneys for Healey call Exxon's allegations absurd, particularly
considering Exxon has taken the public stance of supporting the
overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change. <br>
"Exxon asserts that Attorney General Healey has joined in an illegal
conspiracy to violate Exxon's rights because she does not agree with
Exxon's views about climate change. Yet Exxon also states that it
now endorses climate science, the existence of climate change, and
efforts to combat it—consistent with Attorney Healey's position,"
Healey's attorneys wrote in a recent brief...<br>
Schneiderman's attorneys said that for Exxon to prevail on a free
speech allegation, it must plead and prove its right to free speech
has been violated, something they contend Exxon has not done...<br>
"These public statements demonstrate that, far from being muzzled,
Exxon regularly engages in corporate advocacy concerning climate
change," wrote attorneys for Schneiderman, adding that a state
investigation is not a violation of Exxon's constitutionally
protected rights...<br>
Schneiderman also said that fraudulent statements are not protected
by the First Amendment.<br>
Exxon fired back, alleging that not only are its statements
protected but also the company has been harmed by having to endure
the "burden and expense" of the investigations....<br>
"This filing makes clear that, at a minimum, Exxon's prior
disclosures to investors, including Massachusetts investors, may not
have adequately accounted for the effect of climate change on its
business and assets," attorneys for Healey wrote.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/01/16/exxon-continues-first-amendment-defense-climate-fraud-probes/">https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/01/16/exxon-continues-first-amendment-defense-climate-fraud-probes/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[climate refugees]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/jan/15/study-finds-that-global-warming-exacerbates-refugee-crises">Study
finds that global warming exacerbates refugee crises</a></b><br>
Higher temperatures increase the number of people seeking asylum in
the EU<br>
John Abraham<br>
The refugee crisis - particularly in the Mediterranean area - has
received large amounts of new attention in the past few years, with
people fleeing from Syria and entering the European Union emblematic
of the problem. There has been some research <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/mar/18/worst-mediterranean-drought-in-900-years-has-human-fingerprints-all-over-it">connecting
this refugee problem with changes to the climate</a>. In
particular, the years preceding the Syrian refugee crisis were
characterized by a severe drought that reduced farm output and led
to economic and social strife there.<br>
Separating out the influences of climate change from general social
instability may be impossible, because they are intimately linked.
But we do know that climate change can cause social and economic
instability. We also know that these instabilities can boil over
into larger problems that lead to mass exodus. The problem isn't
knowing the connection between climate and refugees exists - rather
the problem is quantifying it...<br>
After making this connection to observations, the authors then
projected into the future. Using a collection of climate models that
are able to predict Earth's future climate, the authors estimated
that on a business-as-usual emissions pathway (where countries don't
meaningfully reduce greenhouse gas emissions), asylum applications
will increase by almost 200% by the end of the century. On the other
hand, under a modest warming scenario, where humans take some
meaningful action to reduce emissions, the increase falls to about
30%. Again, this shows that what humans do today to combat climate
change really matters...<br>
What was also interesting is that temperature is a better metric for
this problem than precipitation. I wouldn't have guessed that
initially; my naïve expectation would be that precipitation changes
would also be very good at allowing prediction of asylum seekers.
But it turns out temperature is much better. The discussion by the
authors also demonstrated how many moving parts there are to this
problem. Not only are the economic, climate, and social situations
in the source country important, but those factors in the
destination country are also critical. People migrate to where they
expect better conditions.<br>
<blockquote>The significance of our paper is that we are not looking
at impacts in particular countries, but spillovers in the form of
asylum applications. Most economic damage assessments examine the
direct impact on a country, but countries are interlinked. So even
if most of the economic damages occur in developing countries,
there might be repercussions for developed countries. <br>
<br>
There is an existing literature on migration and refugees, but
previous studies usually focus on one country at the time. We use
data from all over the world (103 source countries that list
asylum applications to the EU in every year 2000-2014) to
systematically examine the relationship. We picked the European
Union as destination country since it receives almost half of the
asylum applications. <br>
</blockquote>
Questions about how climate change impacts us and what can be done
to stop or prepare for the changes. This paper takes us another step
toward answering those questions.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/jan/15/study-finds-that-global-warming-exacerbates-refugee-crises">https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/jan/15/study-finds-that-global-warming-exacerbates-refugee-crises</a><br>
</font>- <br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/mar/18/worst-mediterranean-drought-in-900-years-has-human-fingerprints-all-over-it">Worst
Mediterranean drought in 900 years has human fingerprints all
over it</a></b><br>
A new study shows that the current Mediterranean drought is likely
the worst in 900 years, probably due to human-caused intensification<br>
...It's tricky to discern not only whether past extreme weather have
changed, but also whether human-caused global warming is a factor.
Scientists need high-quality records that go back many decades to
see if there is any trend towards increasing or decreasing extreme
weather. But weather is quite variable. We can see a rise or fall in
extreme weather events with no apparent cause, human or natural... <br>
The title of the article, "<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015JD023929/abstract;jsessionid=9E57689ED3903997119102CF87B9D660.f01t02">Spatiotemporal
drought variability in the Mediterranean over the last 900 years</a>"
clearly indicates that this study considers almost a millennium of
drought records and focuses attention on the Mediterranean region.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/mar/18/worst-mediterranean-drought-in-900-years-has-human-fingerprints-all-over-it">https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/mar/18/worst-mediterranean-drought-in-900-years-has-human-fingerprints-all-over-it</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[NYTimes]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/climate-change-is-altering-lakes-and-streams-study-suggests">Climate
change is altering lakes and streams, study suggests</a></b><br>
NEW YORK (NYTIMES) - To scientists who study lakes and rivers, it
seems humans have embarked on a huge unplanned experiment.<br>
By burning fossil fuels, we have already raised the concentration of
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by 40 per cent, and we're on track
to increase it by much more. Some of that gas may mix into the
world's inland waters, and recent studies hint that this may have
profound effects on the species that live in them...<br>
"We're monkeying with the very chemical foundation of these
ecosystems," said Emily H. Stanley, a limnologist (freshwater
ecologist) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "But right now we
don't know enough yet to know where we're going. To me,
scientifically that's really interesting, and as a human a little
bit frightening."..<br>
Scientists began taking continuous measurements of carbon dioxide in
the atmosphere in the 1950s, and today they have more than six
decades of consistent readings. In the 1980s, oceanographers
followed suit, developing carbon dioxide sensors and deploying them
across the planet...<br>
Over the past three decades, they've chronicled a steady rise of
carbon dioxide in seawater. <br>
Now that researchers have grown concerned about carbon dioxide
levels, they've been developing ways to reconstruct their history...<br>
Weiss and her colleagues used this method to figure out the carbon
dioxide levels in four reservoirs in Germany from 1981 to 2015. They
reported Thursday in the journal Current Biology that the amounts
tripled in that time....<br>
"We didn't really know what to expect," said Weiss. "But the speed
of acidification we find is quite fast."..<br>
These tiny, shrimplike creatures filter algae and microbes from
water. They are devoured in turn by small fish, which are eaten by
bigger fish. If rising carbon dioxide were to affect water fleas,
Weiss reasoned, it could influence the entire lake ecosystem...<br>
In another study, the team studied two species of mussels. One
species relaxed its muscles in water high in carbon dioxide, so that
its shell gaped open. The other species clamped its shell shut, so
that it could no longer filter food...<br>
The chemistry of some inland waters causes a lot of carbon dioxide
to be converted into other compounds. Some lakes and streams may
support a lot of underwater plants that take up the gas, for
instance, while others may have microbes can release more of it.<br>
Making matters even more complicated, the carbon dioxide levels in
any particular body of freshwater can change drastically over time
with swings in temperature and other conditions.<br>
"You can have lakes where the carbon dioxide increases tenfold at
night," said Hasler.<br>
In decades to come, as carbon dioxide levels continue to climb in
the atmosphere, Stanley speculated, the picture will only get more
nuanced....<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/climate-change-is-altering-lakes-and-streams-study-suggests">http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/climate-change-is-altering-lakes-and-streams-study-suggests</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Council on Foreign Relations]<b><br>
</b><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.cfr.org/blog/clean-energy-might-reduce-global-warming-what-will-it-do-geopolitics">Clean
Energy Might Reduce Global Warming, But What Will It Do to
Geopolitics?</a></b><br>
Varun Sivaram and Sagatom Saha<br>
We imagine a future in which clean energy has substantially
displaced fossil fuels by midcentury, and we describe five ways that
the geopolitical landscape could shift as a result. Anticipating
these shifts will require farsighted policymaking to safeguard U.S.
interests and retain leadership through the transition from old to
new energy systems. Here are the five most important geopolitical
implications of a clean-energy future:<br>
<b>1. America's Military Footprint in the Middle East Could Shrink</b><br>
In a plausible future in which electric vehicle sales skyrocket and
countries around the world stock up on strategic petroleum reserves,
the U.S. economy will require less oil to function and will be more
resilient to potential supply shocks. This could clear the way for
America to scale back its longstanding strong military presence in
the Middle East...<br>
<b>2. Russia and China Could Dominate the Nuclear Industry,
Thwarting U.S. Geopolitical Goals</b><br>
...Russia and China, America's two greatest geopolitical rivals,
lead the growing market. They may use their dominance in nuclear
exports to build up coteries of client states willing to advance
their geopolitical interests. In a double whammy, global nuclear
security standards—an important U.S. security concern—might degrade
under Russian and Chinese leadership of the nuclear industry...<br>
<b>3. A Modernized Power Grid Could Strengthen North American
Cooperation but Create Cyber-Threats</b><br>
...While these technologies will help grid operators manage the
complex two-way, decentralized electricity flows, they also expose
the United States to cybersecurity risks...<br>
<b>4. The Rise of Clean Energy Could Provoke Global Trade Wars</b><br>
...the benefits an energy-dependent nation could yield from
domestically producing and exporting its own energy may outweigh any
penalty from flouting international trade rules. Yet the slow
erosion of trade norms could threaten the global trade order from
which the United States has reaped prosperity.<br>
<b>5. America's Stance on Climate and Clean Energy Technology
Leadership Could Profoundly Affect Its Global Standing</b><br>
As climate change rises on many countries' diplomatic agendas, so
too would the benefits that America yields from helping other
nations address it. Such a strategy would also grease the wheels of
diplomacy in other international arenas critical to U.S. interests.
By contrast, if the United States cedes leadership to countries such
as China, it will not only jeopardize prospects for limiting climate
change but also alienate allies and adversaries alike...<br>
Now it is up to U.S. policymakers to determine whether the shifting
energy landscape will serve America's interests or force it to cede
its privileged position at the center of global geopolitics.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.cfr.org/blog/clean-energy-might-reduce-global-warming-what-will-it-do-geopolitics">https://www.cfr.org/blog/clean-energy-might-reduce-global-warming-what-will-it-do-geopolitics</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Speaking Notes #8]<br>
OXFORD CHANGE AGENCY EVENT - REPORT<br>
<b><a
href="http://www.climatepsychologyalliance.org/explorations/papers/257-oxford-change-agency-event-report">Agency
in individual and collective change</a></b><br>
Climate Psychology Alliance with Living Witness<br>
A day for psychological and social practitioners to share our
experiences of enabling positive<br>
responses to climate change. <br>
<b>Mindfulness and Nature Connection, led by Nadine Andrews</b><br>
Reflection from Susan Johnson<br>
I enjoyed a playful session of mindfulness and nature-connection
exercises led by Nadine Andrews.<br>
We tracked the sensations in our bodies; practiced recognising
stones with our eyes closed through<br>
touch; connected with trees and plants in the garden after humbly
asking their permission; and<br>
practiced interdependence and raised awareness as we were led around
the garden with our eyes<br>
shut. This brought an aliveness to my body that nourished me deeply.
For me these exercises<br>
supported an ongoing journey into embodied understanding of my place
in the world which<br>
profoundly deepens my sense of calm and connectedness and my ability
to engage with what Joanna<br>
Macy calls the "Great Turning" - the waking up of society towards a
life-sustaining civilization.<br>
Experiencing the "unbending arm" was perhaps the most surprising
exercise - the simple effect of<br>
imagining a flow of water running through my arm into the distance
as I held it out in front of<br>
me, made it so much harder for a colleague to force it to bend
compared to the usual approach of<br>
clenching muscles. This simply and compellingly demonstrated the
very real power that arises from an<br>
embodied connectedness to the world rather than facing a threat with
a sense of isolation and<br>
aloneness.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.climatepsychologyalliance.org/explorations/papers/257-oxford-change-agency-event-report">http://www.climatepsychologyalliance.org/explorations/papers/257-oxford-change-agency-event-report</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[blog]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://newcreationews.blogspot.com/">New Creation News</a></b><br>
News of the planet and the nexus of culture, ecology, justice, and
spirituality.<br>
This is what Margaret Wheatley wrote about our predicament in her
2012 book, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://margaretwheatley.com/books-products/books/far-home/">So
Far From Home - Lost and Found in our Brave New World</a>:<br>
<blockquote>As change agents, activists, concerned citizens, caring
human beings, we are attempting to change a global culture that
has emerged. How many people on the planet are happy with what's
going on? Scarcely any. Most of us are appalled by the aggression,
materialism, and greed now so commonplace... We speak out against
corporate power, the deterioration of democracy, the loss of
equity and opportunity, poverty, diseases the annihilation of
species and culture....<br>
The global culture, with all its tragedies and injustices, is an
emergent phenomenon. We have to accept this terrifying fact. It
came to be from the convergence of many forces and now possesses
characteristics that weren't there until it emerged. It has become
a world where the values of greed, self-interest, and oppressive
power emerged at a global scale and now supersedes all other
values. Many of us, most of us, don't want it to be this way. We
still aspire to work from values of justice, community,
compassion, love. And we need to keep on with this absolutely. But
no matter how well we embody these values, no matter how important
our work is, we have to hold it differently...<br>
</blockquote>
Wheatley is not sanguine or romantic about the nature of this
process and how hard it is to accept. Nor does she reach for some
New Age or Conscious Evolution sort of spirituality that removes us
from this basic drama. "Dark nights," she writes, "are...excellent
examples of how chaos works to create more capacity; like all living
systems, we first have to fall apart before we can figure out how to
reorganize ourselves to fit the new environment. This is the role of
despair - it causes us to fall apart." <br>
<blockquote>We are approaching a great climax in our history when
our industrial prowess and expansion across the planet, our
technological genius and ability to ravage the Earth for the
resources required for that expansion are crashing into inevitable
limits - and not only planetary limits, but also limits of what we
can bear - morally, psychologically, emotionally, and spiritually
- as we witness collectively, by way of all that technology, the
scale of destruction of the planet and the cruelty embedded at the
heart of the greed and material satisfaction that has driven this
economic culture.<br>
</blockquote>
From this perspective, the point is not to try to fix it, but to let
it go, and in that letting go, we break with its logic, with its
energy, and we become available for the next emergence to unfold
through us, to be created through us, having no idea what it will
look like, what that next world will be.<br>
Video: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fVqrFNIRAc">The Shambhala
Warrior Prophecy</a><br>
We are living in extraordinary times. Let's put our best talents,
creativity, skills, and wisdom in service of the emergent new life
that is rising up all around us, even in the midst of the collapse
of the old.<br>
Margaret Swedish<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://newcreationews.blogspot.com/">http://newcreationews.blogspot.com/</a></font><br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2008/11/07/michael-crichton-author-of-state-of-fear-leaves-global-warming-disinformation-legacy/"><br>
</a><font size="+1"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2008/11/07/michael-crichton-author-of-state-of-fear-leaves-global-warming-disinformation-legacy/">This
Day in Climate History January 17, 2006</a> - from D.R.
Tucker</b></font><br>
January 17, 2006: The Fred Barnes book "Rebel-in-Chief: Inside the<br>
Bold and Controversial Presidency of George W. Bush" is released. In<br>
the book, Barnes notes that in 2005, Bush had a private meeting with<br>
overrated novelist and climate-change denier Michael Crichton,
during<br>
which Bush and Crichton "were in near-total agreement" about the<br>
supposed alarmism of climate activists.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/19/national/19warming.html?pagewanted=print&_r=0">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/19/national/19warming.html?pagewanted=print&_r=0</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://scienceblogs.com/intersection/2006/02/16/the-full-barnes-treatment-of-b/">http://scienceblogs.com/intersection/2006/02/16/the-full-barnes-treatment-of-b/</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2008/11/07/michael-crichton-author-of-state-of-fear-leaves-global-warming-disinformation-legacy/">http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2008/11/07/michael-crichton-author-of-state-of-fear-leaves-global-warming-disinformation-legacy/</a></font><br>
<font size="+1"><i><br>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html">Archive
of Daily Global Warming News</a> </i></font><i><br>
</i><span class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a></span><font
size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i><br>
</i></font></i></font><font size="+1"><i> <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="a%20href=%22mailto:contact@theClimate.Vote%22">Send
email to subscribe</a> to news clippings. </i></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><small> </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
</small><small> </small><br>
<small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes. </small><br>
<small>To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
with subject: subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject:
unsubscribe</small><br>
<small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may
subscribe/unsubscribe at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small>
</small><br>
<small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels.</small><small> L</small><small>ist
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</small></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>