<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><i>February 2, 2018</i></font><br>
<br>
[Climate messaging to meteorologists] <br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://youtu.be/iPFNyRzrzdo">Climate
Change: Dr Jim White (January 2018)</a></b><br>
video duration 1:15 [<i>this is an excellent briefing of current
science </i>]<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://youtu.be/iPFNyRzrzdo">https://youtu.be/iPFNyRzrzdo</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Right to Protest]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2018/01/31/iowa-bill-alec-criminalize-pipeline-protest">As
Trump Unfurls Infrastructure Plan, Iowa Bill Seeks to
Criminalize Pipeline Protests</a></b><br>
By Steve Horn <br>
The Iowa Senate has advanced a bill which critics say could lead to
the criminalization of pipeline protests, which are being cast as
"terrorist activities." <a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/energy-transfer-partners-bakken-oil-pipeline-through-iowa"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">Dakota Access pipeline</a><span> </span>owner<span> </span><a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/directory/vocabulary/19688"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">Energy Transfer Partners</a><span> </span>and other
companies have lobbied for the bill, <a
href="https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/publications/LGI/87/SSB3062.pdf"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">Senate Study Bill 3062</a>, which opens uup the possibility
of prison time and a hefty fine for those who commit "sabotage" of
critical infrastructure, such as oil and gas pipelines.<br>
This bill, carrying a criminal punishment of up to 25 years in
prison and $100,000 in fines, resembles the <a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/12/11/alec-model-bill-pipeline-protesters"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">Critical Infrastructure Protection Act</a>, a "model" bill
recently passed by the <a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/american-legislative-exchange-council"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">American Legislative Exchange Council (<span class="caps"
style="font-size: 0.9em;">ALEC</span>)</a>. That<span> </span><span
class="caps" style="font-size: 0.9em;">ALEC</span><span> </span>bill,
intended as a template for state and federal legislation, was based
on <a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/04/23/fracking-billionaire-philip-anschutz-dhs-memo-pipeline-opponents-terrorists"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">Oklahoma's<span> </span>HB<span> </span>1123</a>, which
calls for citizens to receive a felony sentencing, $100,000 fine,
and/or 10 years in prison if their actions "willfully damage,
destroy, vandalize, deface, or tamper with equipment in a critical
infrastructure facility."<br>
According to<span> </span><a
href="https://www.legis.iowa.gov/lobbyist/reports/declarations?ga=87&ba=SSB3062"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">disclosure records</a>, corporations lobbying for the Iowa
bill include not only Energy Transfer Partners, but also <a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/koch-industries-inc"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">Koch Industries</a>, the<span> </span><a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/american-petroleum-institute"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">American Petroleum Institute,</a> Valero Energy, Magellan
Midstream, and others. The Iowa State Police Association has also
come out in support of the bill, while the American Civil Liberties
Union (<span class="caps" style="font-size: 0.9em;">ACLU</span>) of
Iowa is against it. The bill has passed out of subcommittee and next
goes in front of the state Senate Judiciary Committee...<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.desmoinesregister.com/videos/news/2018/01/25/iowa-officials-discuss-bill-aimed-preventing-criminal-acts-against-pipelines-and-other-critical-infrastructure/109822424/">Video
of: Iowa officials discuss bill aimed at preventing criminal acts
against pipelines and other critical infrastructure.</a> State
Sen. Jack Shipley and Iowa Homeland Security legislative liaison
John Benson discuss a legislative bill intended to prevent criminal
acts against pipeline and other critical infrastructure.<br>
The bill's introduction comes as President<span> </span><a
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/donald-trump" target="_blank"
style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153, 204);">Donald
Trump</a> called for Congress to<span> </span><a
href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-state-union-address/"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">pass a $1.5 trillion infrastructure bill</a><span> </span>in
his State of the Union Address, which according to a<span> </span><a
href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4360780/White-House-Draft-Plan-to-Streamline-Federal.pdf"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">leaked outline</a><span> </span>of his proposal<span> </span><a
href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-plan-would-reduce-environmental-requirements-for-infrastructure-projects/2018/01/26/b15bd66a-0248-11e8-8acf-ad2991367d9d_story.html?utm_term=.924f32b23fc5"
target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 153,
204);">published by The Washington Post</a>, includes pipelines
and would expedite the federal regulatory permitting process for
them, largely by simply removing environmental requirements.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2018/01/31/iowa-bill-alec-criminalize-pipeline-protest">https://www.desmogblog.com/2018/01/31/iowa-bill-alec-criminalize-pipeline-protest</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[National Geographic]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/02/polar-bears-starve-melting-sea-ice-global-warming-study-beaufort-sea-environment/">Polar
Bears Really Are Starving Because of Global Warming, Study Shows</a></b><br>
New science sheds more light on recent controversy over how much the
large carnivores are being impacted by melting sea ice.<font
size="-1"><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/02/polar-bears-starve-melting-sea-ice-global-warming-study-beaufort-sea-environment/">https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/02/polar-bears-starve-melting-sea-ice-global-warming-study-beaufort-sea-environment/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[USA Today]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2018/02/01/global-temperatures-could-pass-limit-set-paris-climate-deal-within-5-years/1087326001/">Global
temperatures could pass limit set by Paris climate deal within 5
years</a><br>
</b>...the forecast from the United Kingdom's Met Office says. It's
now likely temperatures will exceed 1 degree Celsius, or 1.8 degrees
Fahrenheit, as soon as 2022.<br>
"It is the first time that such high values have been highlighted
within these forecasts," the Met Office said in a <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/2018/decadal-forecast-2018">statement</a>.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2018/02/01/global-temperatures-could-pass-limit-set-paris-climate-deal-within-5-years/1087326001/">https://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2018/02/01/global-temperatures-could-pass-limit-set-paris-climate-deal-within-5-years/1087326001/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[conclusion]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/31/climate-change-threatens-us-military-bases-pentagon">Climate
change threatens half of US bases worldwide, Pentagon report
finds</a></b><br>
Defense department says wild weather could endanger 1,700 sites<br>
Findings run counter to White House views on climate<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/31/climate-change-threatens-us-military-bases-pentagon">https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/31/climate-change-threatens-us-military-bases-pentagon</a></font><br>
-<br>
[Pentagon Report Jan 2018]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climateandsecurity.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/tab-b-slvas-report-1-24-2018.pdf">Department
of Defense Climate-Related Risk to DoD Infrastructure<br>
Initial Vulnerability Assessment Survey<br>
</a></b>(SLVAS) Report January 2018<br>
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics<br>
<b>Survey Process</b> To identify DoD installations with
vulnerabilities, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Energy, Installations and Environment, <b>initiated a
preliminary Screening Level Vulnerability Assessment Survey
(SLVAS) of DoD sites worldwide</b><br>
The survey asked respondents to identify any negative effects they
may have <br>
experienced from extreme weather effects, both on the assets on the
DoD site itself as well as any <br>
observed effects on similar assets in the surrounding community that
provided supporting services<br>
(e.g., utilities, transportation, emergency response) for the DoD
site. <br>
These included:<br>
Flooding due to storm surge<br>
Flooding due to non-storm surge events (e.g., rain, snow, sleet,
ice, river overflow)<br>
Extreme temperatures (both hot and cold)<br>
Wind<br>
Drought<br>
Wildfire...<br>
<b>Analysis, Trends and Conclusions</b><br>
The SLVAS responses yielded a wide range of qualitative
information. The highest number of reported effects <br>
resulted from drought (782) followed closely by wind (763) and
non-storm surge related flooding (706)<br>
About 10% of sites indicated being affected by extreme temperatures
(351), while flooding due to storm surge (225) and wildfire (210)
affected <br>
about 6% of the sites reporting. Nearly 50% of sites (1,684)
reported they had no effects to any assets from the effects. <br>
The geographic dispersion of sites reporting negative effects from
one or more effects was very broad and was very similar <br>
to those reporting no effects at all. <br>
This may have more to do with the nature of a qualitative survey
completed by hundreds of different users than it did the actual
sites themselves. <br>
The asset categories most reported as having one or more effects in
the past were: airfield operations, followed by transportation
infrastructure, energy infrastructure, training/range facilities,
and water/wastewater systems to round out the top five.
Logistics/supply operations ranked last in reported effects. <br>
The survey responses provide a preliminary qualitative picture of
assets currently affected by severe weather events (e.g., storm
surge, wildfires, high winds) as well as an indication of assets
that may be affected by sea level rise in the future.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climateandsecurity.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/tab-b-slvas-report-1-24-2018.pdf">https://climateandsecurity.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/tab-b-slvas-report-1-24-2018.pdf</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[CO2 Sequestration unlikely]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/feb/01/silver-bullet-to-suck-co2-from-air-and-halt-climate-change-ruled-out">'Silver
bullet' to suck CO2 from air and halt climate change ruled out</a></b><br>
Scientists say climate targets cannot be met using the technologies,
which either risk huge damage to the environment or are very costly<br>
From simply planting trees to filtering CO2 out of the air, the
technologies that some hope could be a "silver bullet" in halting
global warming either risk huge damage to the environment themselves
or are likely to be very costly.<br>
Virtually all the pathways laid out by the UN's Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to reach the targets in the Paris
agreement require huge deployment of so-called negative emissions
technologies (NETs) in the second half of the century.<br>
This is because cuts in CO2 are expected to be too slow to hit zero
emissions quickly enough, so the overshoot has to be recaptured
later by NETs. The IPCC calculates that about 12bn tonnes a year
will need to be captured and stored after 2050 - the equivalent of
about a third of all global emissions today...<br>
The new report is from the European Academies Science Advisory
Council (EASAC), which advises the European Union and is comprised
of the national science academies of the 28 member states. It warns
that relying on NETs instead of emissions cuts could fail and result
in severe global warming and "serious implications for future
generations".<br>
The report assesses the range of possible technologies, including
"bioenergy with carbon capture and storage" (BECCS), on which the
IPCC scenarios rely heavily. BECCS involves growing trees, which
take CO2 from the atmosphere, and then burning them to produce
electricity while capturing the emissions and burying them.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/feb/01/silver-bullet-to-suck-co2-from-air-and-halt-climate-change-ruled-out">https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/feb/01/silver-bullet-to-suck-co2-from-air-and-halt-climate-change-ruled-out</a></font><br>
-<br>
[CO2 sequestration]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://easac.eu/publications/details/easac-net/">Negative
emission technologies What role in meeting Paris Agreement
targets?</a></b><br>
...They find that NETs (negative emission technologies) have
"limited realistic potential" to halt increases in the concentration
of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at the scale envisioned in the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenarios. This new
report finds that none of the NETs has the potential to deliver
carbon removals at the gigaton (Gt) scale and at the rate of
deployment envisaged by the IPCC,..<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/Negative_Carbon/EASAC_Report_on_Negative_Emission_Technologies.pdf">Download
EASAC Report on Negative Emissions Technologies </a></b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/Negative_Carbon/EASAC_Report_on_Negative_Emission_Technologies.pdf">https://easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/Negative_Carbon/EASAC_Report_on_Negative_Emission_Technologies.pdf</a><br>
"Relying on NETs to compensate for failures to adequately mitigate
emissions may have serious implications for future generations," <br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://easac.eu/publications/details/easac-net/">https://easac.eu/publications/details/easac-net/</a><br>
</font> <br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/02/01/colombia-government-protect-climate-amazon/">Kids
Sue Colombian Government to Save the Amazon, Protect Climate</a></b><br>
A group of 25 young people in Colombia are petitioning a court to
protect their constitutional rights to life and a healthy
environment. The group is asking the court to require the government
to honor its climate commitment and stop deforestation in the
Amazon...<br>
This week's case, uses a legal mechanism created in 1991 that
guarantees citizens a prompt court consideration on claims of
constitutional rights violations. <br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/02/01/colombia-government-protect-climate-amazon/">https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/02/01/colombia-government-protect-climate-amazon/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[South Africa drought]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.buzzfeed.com/tamerragriffin/a-massive-drought-could-leave-four-million-people-without?">A
Massive Drought Could Leave 4 Million People Without Water.
Here's What You Need To Know.</a></b><br>
People in Cape Town, South Africa, have two and a half months to
conserve as much water as they can before it all runs out on "Day
Zero."<br>
<b>Cape Town, one of the largest cities in Africa, is running out of
water.</b><br>
Unless residents can limit their consumption, or the city gets a
massive amount of rainfall within the next two months, the city of
just over 4 million will become the first in the world to be
completely drained of water.<br>
On Feb. 1, the South African city's government ordered residents not
to use more than 13 gallons of water a day, a 9-gallon drop from its
previous mandate. (For scale, people in the US use between 80 and
100 gallons of water a day.) The restrictions are part of its
larger, desperate attempt to avoid "Day Zero," the ominous name
given to the date that Cape Town is expected to be effectively
waterless...<br>
<b>- The situation in Cape Town is the result of a three-year-long
drought that has dried up the city's dams, an event scientists say
is linked to climate change...<br>
- Day Zero is when Cape Town is supposed to run out of water, but
the date keeps changing..<br>
</b><b>- In order to avoid Day Zero altogether, the Cape Town
government has issued water restriction rules and set up
collection points all over the city...<br>
</b><b>- People form long lines every day at the collection points
to fill their jugs with water...<br>
</b><b>- It's too soon to say whether what's happening in Cape Town
is a warning sign for other big cities dealing with drought...</b><br>
He also mentioned Los Angeles, another big city recently stricken
with drought, but said it was impossible to draw connections between
them.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.buzzfeed.com/tamerragriffin/a-massive-drought-could-leave-four-million-people-without">https://www.buzzfeed.com/tamerragriffin/a-massive-drought-could-leave-four-million-people-without</a></font><br>
-<br>
[Cape Town's Water Crisis]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2018-01-22-from-the-inside-the-countdown-to-day-zero/#.WnPwoK7txpg">From
the Inside: The Countdown to Day Zero</a></b><br>
HELEN ZILLE 22 JAN 2018 (SOUTH AFRICA)<br>
Those of us whose job it is to monitor developments in Cape Town's
water crisis saw the indicators move sharply this week, in the wrong
direction.<br>
There was bad news - catastrophic actually - on three fronts:<br>
- Cape Town's water usage went up again, to over 600-million litres
per day, despite major efforts, over six months, to bring it down
below 500-million litres.<br>
- The SA Weather Service informed us that as far as forecasting
goes, we are flying blind. Last year the forecast of a wet winter
proved to be widely off the mark. On Friday, the SA Weather service
told us bluntly: We cannot predict whether or when rain will come.
Previous forecasting models have proved useless in the era of
climate change.<br>
- Day Zero - when the taps in suburbia are switched off - has moved
from the realm of possibility to probability. There is no way in
which water augmentation schemes will compensate for our ongoing
failure to curb demand sufficiently in the short term...<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2018-01-22-from-the-inside-the-countdown-to-day-zero/#.WnPwoK7txpg">https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2018-01-22-from-the-inside-the-countdown-to-day-zero/#.WnPwoK7txpg</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Opinion]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/feb/01/its-not-okay-how-clueless-donald-trump-is-about-climate-change">It's
not okay how clueless Donald Trump is about climate change</a></b><br>
We've come to accept Trump's ignorance, but it's often dangerous...<br>
...While this is all behavior that we've come to expect from Donald
Trump, that doesn't make it okay. He may be<span> </span><a
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/jun/01/donald-trump-just-cemented-his-legacy-as-americas-worst-ever-president"
data-link-name="in body link" class="u-underline"
style="background: transparent; touch-action: manipulation; color:
rgb(136, 1, 5); cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none !important;
border-bottom: 0.0625rem solid rgb(220, 220, 220); transition:
border-color 0.15s ease-out;">America's worst-ever president</a>,
but he's still the leader of one of the world's most powerful
countries, with some of the world's best scientific resources at his
disposal. That<span> </span><a
href="https://mashable.com/2018/01/29/trump-climate-denial-piers-morgan-hurting-agenda/?utm_cid=hp-n-1#VXdlFACNaaqm"
data-link-name="in body link" class="u-underline"
style="background: transparent; touch-action: manipulation; color:
rgb(136, 1, 5); cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none !important;
border-bottom: 0.0625rem solid rgb(220, 220, 220); transition:
border-color 0.15s ease-out;">his science advisor is effectively
Fox News</a>, as Andrew Freedman put it, is unacceptable and
dangerous.<br>
Americans clearly made a terrible mistake in electing him president
(though<span> </span><a
href="http://www.cnn.com/election/2016/results/exit-polls"
data-link-name="in body link" class="u-underline"
style="background: transparent; touch-action: manipulation; color:
rgb(136, 1, 5); cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none !important;
border-bottom: 0.0625rem solid rgb(220, 220, 220); transition:
border-color 0.15s ease-out;">61% of voters did realize Trump is
unqualified for the job</a>), but it's a mistake they won't be
able to remedy until 2020. Congress could act as a co-equal branch
and pass climate legislation, but Americans put Republicans in
charge of that institution as well, and with the exception of the
party's 34<span> </span><a
href="https://citizensclimatelobby.org/climate-solutions-caucus/"
data-link-name="in body link" class="u-underline"
style="background: transparent; touch-action: manipulation; color:
rgb(136, 1, 5); cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none !important;
border-bottom: 0.0625rem solid rgb(220, 220, 220); transition:
border-color 0.15s ease-out;">Climate Solutions Caucus</a><span> </span>members,
they're also content to ignore the existential threat of climate
change. However, Americans will have the opportunity to remedy that
mistake this November.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/feb/01/its-not-okay-how-clueless-donald-trump-is-about-climate-change">https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/feb/01/its-not-okay-how-clueless-donald-trump-is-about-climate-change</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/153913-1">This Day in
Climate History February 2, 1977 </a> - from D.R. Tucker</b></font><br>
February 2, 1977: In a (literal) fireside chat, President Carter
discusses his plans to establish a national energy policy that
emphasizes conservation.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=7455">http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=7455</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/153913-1">http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/153913-1</a>
<br>
<font size="+1"><i><br>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html">Archive
of Daily Global Warming News</a> </i></font><i><br>
</i><span class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a></span><font
size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i><br>
</i></font></i></font><font size="+1"><i> <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="a%20href=%22mailto:contact@theClimate.Vote%22">Send
email to subscribe</a> to news clippings. </i></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><small> </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
</small><small> </small><br>
<small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes. </small><br>
<small>To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
with subject: subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject:
unsubscribe</small><br>
<small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may
subscribe/unsubscribe at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small>
</small><br>
<small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels.</small><small> L</small><small>ist
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</small></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>