<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><i>May 12, 2018</i></font><br>
<br>
[talks end]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climatenewsnetwork.net/bonn-climate-talks-make-gradual-progress/">Bonn
climate talks make gradual progress</a></b><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climatenewsnetwork.net/bonn-climate-talks-make-gradual-progress/"><br>
</a>Despite the "missing in action" US, delegates say the Bonn
climate talks just ended made progress – but too little and too
slowly.<br>
By Paul Brown<br>
<em>LONDON, 11 May, 2018</em> – The Bonn climate talks, <a
href="https://climatenewsnetwork.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e13c74c17ec527c4be72d64f&id=86030b8e05&e=30dc80e2f6"
style="word-wrap: break-word;-ms-text-size-adjust:
100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;color: #6DC6DD;font-weight:
normal;text-decoration: underline;">a crucial round of UN
negotiations</a> on pumping up the muscle of the global treaty on
tackling climate change, the <a
href="https://climatenewsnetwork.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e13c74c17ec527c4be72d64f&id=dc4fc2a56c&e=30dc80e2f6"
style="word-wrap: break-word;-ms-text-size-adjust:
100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;color: #6DC6DD;font-weight:
normal;text-decoration: underline;">Paris Agreement</a>, has ended
in Germany. <br>
Participants heading for home know they have a daunting workload
ahead, with too few solid outcomes achieved in the last 10 days. But
despite the absence of the US government, described by some as
"missing in action" after <a
href="https://climatenewsnetwork.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e13c74c17ec527c4be72d64f&id=7c53d4971a&e=30dc80e2f6"
style="word-wrap: break-word;-ms-text-size-adjust:
100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;color: #6DC6DD;font-weight:
normal;text-decoration: underline;">Donald Trump's repudiation of
the Paris treaty</a>, many still hope that Bonn has proved a
useful prelude to the next climate summit.<br>
This dogged optimism apart, the organisers, <a
href="https://climatenewsnetwork.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e13c74c17ec527c4be72d64f&id=5d8726e317&e=30dc80e2f6"
style="word-wrap: break-word;-ms-text-size-adjust:
100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;color: #6DC6DD;font-weight:
normal;text-decoration: underline;">the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change </a>(UNFCCC), alarmed at Bonn's lack of progress,
are arranging an unusual extra week of talks in Bangkok in
September to help the world leaders <a
href="https://climatenewsnetwork.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6e13c74c17ec527c4be72d64f&id=1858f26780&e=30dc80e2f6"
style="word-wrap: break-word;-ms-text-size-adjust:
100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;color: #6DC6DD;font-weight:
normal;text-decoration: underline;">who will meet in Katowice in
Poland</a> in December to agree how to prevent the world from
dangerously overheating.<br>
One key sticking point so far is the failure of developed countries
to produce the previously promised US$100 billion a year by 2020 to
allow poor and vulnerable countries to adapt to climate change. In
some cases the survival of small island states depends on that help.<br>
The purpose of this year's round of UN climate talks is to finalise
and implement the Paris Agreement, concluded in 2015, which aims to
prevent global temperatures from increasing by more than 2 degrees C
over their pre-industrial levels, and if possible keep them below
1.5 degrees C.<strong><br>
</strong>"Now is the time for action. Now is the time to commit to
making the decisions the world must make"...<strong><br>
</strong>A more cheerful note came from Camilla Born, of the
environmental think tank E3G. She said: "Negotiations went better
than expected. The next challenge is to mobilise the political will
to get the COP24 outcomes over the line in Katowice.<br>
"This won't be easy but the Polish Presidency has the chance to up
their game. The pressure is on the likes of the EU, China and Canada
to come good on the universality of the Paris Agreement even whilst
the US is for now missing in action." <font size="-1"><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenewsnetwork.net/bonn-climate-talks-make-gradual-progress/">https://climatenewsnetwork.net/bonn-climate-talks-make-gradual-progress/</a></font><br>
- - -<br>
[Video summary]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://enb.iisd.org/videos/climate/unfccc-sb48-env/wrap-up/?autoplay">ENV
/ Daily Coverage for the Bonn Climate Change Conference -
April/May 2018</a></b><br>
Monday, 30 April - Thursday, 10 May 2018 | Duration: 5:04<br>
The Bonn Climate Change Conference concluded on Thursday, 10 May
2018. The Subsidiary Body on Implementation, (SBI), Subsidiary Body
for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) and the Ad hoc
Working Group on the Paris Agreement (APA) adopted conclusions and
agreed to future work, including at the next meeting in Bangkok,
Thailand. Delegates reflect on the meeting.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://enb.iisd.org/videos/climate/unfccc-sb48-env/wrap-up/?autoplay">http://enb.iisd.org/videos/climate/unfccc-sb48-env/wrap-up/?autoplay</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Energy transition within 1.5 degrees C]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.ecofys.com/en/publications/energy-transition-within-15c/">A
disruptive approach to 100% decarbonisation of the global energy
system by 2050</a></b><br>
Published: 30/04/2018<br>
Decarbonisation of the global energy system is one of the big
challenges society faces today. The Paris Agreement, adopted in
2015, states that efforts should be pursued to limit the temperature
increase to 1.5 degrees C above pre-industrial levels. This is a
tightening of earlier agreements that put the limit at 2 degrees C.
In this paper, Ecofys, a Navigant company, explored the question:
What does such increased ambition mean for the global energy system?<br>
If society keeps on emitting CO2 at the current pace, the carbon
budget to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees C will be
exceeded in one or two decades. The energy experts investigated
options for a fast energy system transformation and developed a
scenario against a background of increasing population and growing
demand for energy services like space heating and cooling,
transportation, and materials production. The resulting
decarbonisation scenario includes several critical levers to
constrain emissions:<br>
<blockquote>- Ongoing efforts to deliver all energy services in an
efficient way<br>
- Electrifying energy consumption, especially for buildings and
transportation<br>
- Fast penetration of wind and solar in the electricity sector<br>
- Adopting a range of other renewable energy technologies, from
solar heat to electricity-based hydrogen<br>
- Bioenergy as a fuel source for the manufacturing industry and
specific transportation needs and a role for carbon capture and
storage (CCS) in specific sectors<br>
</blockquote>
As result of strong energy efficiency improvements, it is possible
to bring global energy use below current levels to 435 EJ, a large
contrast to business as usual growth to over 800 EJ. While the total
primary energy supply in the scenario is decreasing slightly,
electricity demand is expected to almost triple. Ecofys, a Navigant
company, estimates that all this energy can be supplied from
zero-carbon or low carbon energy sources.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.ecofys.com/en/publications/energy-transition-within-15c/">https://www.ecofys.com/en/publications/energy-transition-within-15c/</a></font><br>
<b><br>
<br>
</b>[more coal, globally]<b><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climatenewsnetwork.net/24158-2/">Confusion reigns
over China's energy policy</a></b><br>
May 7, 2018, by Kieran Cooke<br>
<span style="box-sizing: border-box;"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climatenewsnetwork.net/24158-2/">China's energy
policy seems perplexing: coal use reductions at home, while
abroad it is helping to build coal-fired power plants</a>.</span><br>
<em style="box-sizing: border-box;">BELGRADE, SERBIA, 7 May, 2018</em><span> </span>–
It's quite easy these days to find yourself muddled over China's
energy policy: it does seem often to amount to tackling domestic
pollution and climate change, but chasing lucrative contracts
abroad, despite the environmental impact.<br>
With the US under Donald Trump indicating it wants to withdraw from
the<span> </span><a
href="https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement"
style="box-sizing: border-box; text-decoration: none; color:
rgb(7, 80, 141); font-weight: 500; background: rgba(7, 80, 141,
0.05); padding: 0.1em 0.3em; transition: all 0.3s;">Paris
Agreement</a><span> </span>on climate change, China is
increasingly seen as a world leader in the battle to cut carbon
emissions and prevent climate catastrophe.<br>
Beijing is implementing ambitious renewable energy schemes at home
and has announced plans to reshape its energy sector and reduce its
use of coal – by far the most polluting fossil fuel.<br>
But overseas, China is<span> </span><a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/01/climate/china-energy-companies-coal-plants-climate-change.html"
style="box-sizing: border-box; text-decoration: none; color:
rgb(7, 80, 141); font-weight: 500; background: rgba(7, 80, 141,
0.05); padding: 0.1em 0.3em; transition: all 0.3s;">pursuing a
very different policy</a>. Here in Serbia a Chinese enterprise,<span> </span><a
href="http://en.cmec.com/gsgk/gsjj/" style="box-sizing:
border-box; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(7, 80, 141);
font-weight: 500; background: rgba(7, 80, 141, 0.05); padding:
0.1em 0.3em; transition: all 0.3s;">China Machinery Engineering
Corporation</a><span> </span>(CMEC), recently started work on a
multi-million dollar project to enlarge<span> </span><a
href="https://bankwatch.org/project/kostolac-lignite-power-plant-serbia"
style="box-sizing: border-box; text-decoration: none; color:
rgb(7, 80, 141); font-weight: 500; background: rgba(7, 80, 141,
0.05); padding: 0.1em 0.3em; transition: all 0.3s;">the coal-fired
Kostolac power station</a><span> </span>on the banks of the Danube
river in the east of the country.<br>
<font size="-1">More at: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenewsnetwork.net/24158-2/">https://climatenewsnetwork.net/24158-2/</a></font><br>
- - -<br>
[see you in court]<br>
Battle Lines Drawn for Hearing on New York Climate Lawsuit Vs. Big
Oil<br>
<strong style="box-sizing: inherit; font-weight: 700;">By Dana
Drugmand</strong><br>
<span style="box-sizing: inherit; font-weight: 400;">Oil companies,
already busy fending off lawsuits from several California
communities, have filed opposition to a similar suit from New York
City.</span><br>
<span style="box-sizing: inherit; font-weight: 400;">Chevron,
ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil filed a<span> </span></span><a
href="https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.486408/gov.uscourts.nysd.486408.100.0.pdf"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent; color:
rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; font-weight: 500;"><span
style="box-sizing: inherit; font-weight: 400;">memorandum of law</span></a><span
style="box-sizing: inherit; font-weight: 400;"><span> </span>last
week, arguing to dismiss New York's climate liability lawsuit.
Their long list of reasons includes the city's dependence on and
use of fossil fuels, a lack of standing by the city to sue and the
now-familiar Big Oil argument that because the Clean Air Act
governs climate pollution, courts should not intervene.</span><br>
<span style="box-sizing: inherit; font-weight: 400;">New York, which<span> </span></span><a
href="https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/01/10/new-york-city-climate-lawsuit-liability-bill-de-blasio/"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent; color:
rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; font-weight: 500;"><span
style="box-sizing: inherit; font-weight: 400;">sued the five
biggest oil companies</span></a><span style="box-sizing:
inherit; font-weight: 400;"> in January, promptly responded with
an<span> </span></span><a
href="https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.486408/gov.uscourts.nysd.486408.101.0.pdf"
style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: transparent; color:
rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; font-weight: 500;"><span
style="box-sizing: inherit; font-weight: 400;">opposition to the
motion</span></a><span style="box-sizing: inherit; font-weight:
400;">. It rejects all of the oil companies' arguments, explicitly
noting that the Clean Air Act does not regulate fossil fuel
production and sale, and therefore is not viable grounds for
dismissal. </span><br>
<span style="box-sizing: inherit; font-weight: 400;">"The case
should not be dismissed because it is well-grounded in the law of
public nuisance and trespass and is not preempted by federal law,"
said a New York City Law Department spokesman. "The defendants'
products inevitably contribute to climate change when used exactly
as intended and they understood decades ago that this process
would cause grave harm to coastal cities like New York."</span><br>
<span style="box-sizing: inherit; font-weight: 400;">A hearing on
the defendants' motion to dismiss is scheduled for June 13 in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York...</span><br>
<font size="-1">More at: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/05/11/new-york-climate-lawsuit-hearing-exxon-chevron/">https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/05/11/new-york-climate-lawsuit-hearing-exxon-chevron/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Gallup Polling on the future] <br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://news.gallup.com/poll/234314/global-warming-age-gap-younger-americans-worried.aspx">Global
Warming Age Gap: Younger Americans Most Worried</a></b><br>
Gallup WASHINGTON, D.C. <br>
Public concern about global warming is evident across all age groups
in the U.S., with majorities of younger and older Americans saying
they worry about the problem a great deal or fair amount. However,
the extent to which Americans take global warming seriously and
worry about it differs markedly by age, with adults under age 35
typically much more engaged with the problem than those 55 and
older.<br>
Younger adults are also significantly more likely to think news
reports on global warming underestimate the problem. They are more
likely to worry ...<br>
70% of Americans age 18 to 34 worry about global warming<br>
This compares with 62% of those 35 to 54 and 56% who are 55 or older<br>
- - - -<br>
There are several potential reasons for these generational
differences surrounding climate change. One, as is evident in
particular on the question about global warming's effects in one's
lifetime, results from the fact that older Americans may perceive
that they will no longer be living when global warming changes the
world more dramatically.<br>
Another reason results from the relationship between age and party
identification. Gallup has previously found a significant partisan
divide on Americans' attitudes concerning global warming. This
partisan gap may be reflected in the trend by age group, with
younger Americans tending to tilt toward the Democratic Party, and
thus being more likely to adopt the Democratic position on global
warming.<br>
Finally, younger people may have been exposed to more discussion
about climate change and the environment in their more recent
education experiences, while the issue was not on the educational
agenda for many Americans who were in school decades ago<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://news.gallup.com/poll/234314/global-warming-age-gap-younger-americans-worried.aspx">http://news.gallup.com/poll/234314/global-warming-age-gap-younger-americans-worried.aspx</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Heat and human diet in the climate hierarchy]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://news.mit.edu/2018/workshop-explores-intertwined-future-food-production-water-climate-0511">Workshop
explores intertwined future of food production, water, and
climate</a></b><br>
Choices by consumers and farmers can help limit global warming, but
climate change may also curtail those choices in the future.<br>
David L. Chandler - MIT News Office <br>
"A lot of conventional wisdom is wrong," said David Lobell, deputy
director of the Center on Food Security and the Environment at
Stanford University. For example, he said that studies of climate
change and agriculture often focus on projected rainfall changes,
but actually it is the temperature increase itself that has the
greatest effect on crops...<br>
- - - - -<br>
But much less drastic measures could also make a difference, he
said: "It doesn't require binary choices." Just eliminating or
reducing consumption of red meat, the most greenhouse-gas intensive
food, could reduce emissions by almost a third, according to Smth.
"A decrease in meat consumption could have an absolutely enormous
impact," he said - and be much better for people's health. "Diets
that give us substantial health benefits also give us a healthier
environment, and are more sustainable," he said....<font size="-1"><br>
More at: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://news.mit.edu/2018/workshop-explores-intertwined-future-food-production-water-climate-0511">http://news.mit.edu/2018/workshop-explores-intertwined-future-food-production-water-climate-0511</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Miami opinion]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/editorials/article210451219.html">Three
newspapers confront one challenge: Sea-level rise is real, South
Florida needs all hands on deck - now</a></b><br>
MIAMI HERALD EDITORIAL BOARD<br>
Updated May 05, 2018 <br>
No graver threat faces the future of South Florida than the
accelerating pace of sea-level rise. In the past century, the sea
has risen 9 inches in Key West. In the past 23 years, it's risen 3
inches. By 2060, it's predicted to rise another 2 feet, with no sign
of slowing down.<br>
Think about that. Water levels could easily be 2 feet higher in 40
years. And scientists say that's a conservative estimate. Because of
melting ice sheets and how oceans circulate, there's a chance South
Florida's sea level could be 3 feet higher by 2060 and as much as 8
feet by 2100, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.<br>
It's not just a matter of how much land we're going to lose, though
the barrier islands and low-lying communities will be largely
uninhabitable once the ocean rises by 3 feet. It's a matter of what
can be saved. And elsewhere, how we're going to manage the retreat..<br>
- - - -<br>
Of the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.climatecentral.org/news/us-cities-most-vulnerable-major-coastal-flooding-sea-level-rise-21748">25
American cities</a> most vulnerable to sea-level rise, 22 are in
Florida, according to the nonprofit research group Climate Central.<br>
<font size="-1">More at: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/editorials/article210451219.html">http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/editorials/article210451219.html</a></font><br>
- - - -<br>
[Here are the 25]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.climatecentral.org/news/us-cities-most-vulnerable-major-coastal-flooding-sea-level-rise-21748">These
U.S. Cities Are Most Vulnerable to Major Coastal Flooding and
Sea Level Rise</a><br>
Image: </b><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://assets.climatecentral.org/images/made/10_25_17_Editorial_Current_Top25_650_455_s_c1_c_c.jpg">http://assets.climatecentral.org/images/made/10_25_17_Editorial_Current_Top25_650_455_s_c1_c_c.jpg</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.climatecentral.org/news/us-cities-most-vulnerable-major-coastal-flooding-sea-level-rise-21748">http://www.climatecentral.org/news/us-cities-most-vulnerable-major-coastal-flooding-sea-level-rise-21748</a><br>
<br>
<br>
[Candidates]<br>
<b><a href="http://www.314action.org/endorsed-candidates-1/">314
Action is proud to endorse these scientists and other STEM
leaders who will fight to protect science and stand up to
climate deniers.</a></b><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.314action.org/endorsed-candidates-1/">http://www.314action.org/endorsed-candidates-1/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[gnarly, dude]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-44078255">Massive
wave is southern hemisphere record, scientists believe</a></b><br>
Scientists in New Zealand have documented what they believe is the
largest wave ever recorded in the southern hemisphere.<br>
The 23.8m (78ft) wave was measured by a buoy on New Zealand's
Campbell Island in the Southern Ocean on Tuesday, the country's
weather authority said.<br>
It eclipses a 22.03m wave that was identified south of the
Australian state of Tasmania in 2012.<br>
Larger waves have been recorded in the northern hemisphere<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-44078255">http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-44078255</a><br>
<br>
<br>
[random yet tangential]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.cnet.com/news/the-bizarre-tale-of-the-australia-flat-earth-convention-that-fell-apart/">The
bizarre tale of the flat-Earth convention that fell apart</a></b><br>
A vicious falling-out, alleged death threats, an arson attempt. This
is the story of how Australia's first flat-Earth conference
destroyed itself from the inside out.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.cnet.com/news/the-bizarre-tale-of-the-australia-flat-earth-convention-that-fell-apart/">https://www.cnet.com/news/the-bizarre-tale-of-the-australia-flat-earth-convention-that-fell-apart/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/may/12/obama-methane-emissions-rule-oil-gas-climate-change"><font
size="+1"><b>This Day in Climate History - May 12, 2016</b></font></a><br>
The Guardian - Obama's methane rule an aggressive step toward
tackling climate change<br>
<blockquote>The Obama administration announced on Thursday new rules
to cut methane emissions from the oil and gas industry almost in
half - tackling a powerful climate pollutant in the president's
final months in the White House.<br>
<br>
The rules, stronger than earlier proposals, are aimed at reducing
methane emissions from the US by 40% to 45% over 2012 levels by
2025 by requiring companies to capture gas from oil wells, and
find and plug pipeline leaks. America is currently the world’s
largest oil and gas producer...<br>
- - - - -<br>
The American Petroleum Institute, the main oil and gas lobby,
maintained that the industry was plugging leaking wells and
pipelines anyway – and that the new rules would stifle innovation.
"Imposing a one-size-fits-all scheme on the industry could
actually stifle innovation and discourage investment," the lobby
group said in a statement.<br>
<br>
The White House admitted the administration had at first
underestimated the scale of methane emissions from the thousands
of new wells put into production during the fracking boom - which
transformed the US into an energy superpower.<br>
<br>
The US has also experienced devastating methane leaks from ageing
oil and gas infrastructure - such as the Aliso Canyon storage site
in California. The leak was the single largest source of climate
pollution in California last year. <br>
</blockquote>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/may/12/obama-methane-emissions-rule-oil-gas-climate-change">http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/may/12/obama-methane-emissions-rule-oil-gas-climate-change</a><br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><i>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html">Archive
of Daily Global Warming News</a> </i></font><i><br>
</i><span class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a></span><font
size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i><br>
</i></font></i></font><font size="+1"><i> <br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i>To receive daily
mailings - <a
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request">click
to Subscribe</a> </i></font>to news digest. </i></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><small> </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
</small><small> </small><br>
<small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes. </small><br>
<small>To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
with subject: subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject:
unsubscribe</small><br>
<small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may
subscribe/unsubscribe at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small>
</small><br>
<small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels.</small><small> L</small><small>ist
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</small></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>