<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><i>June 22, 2018</i></font><br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/fish-wars-loom-as-climate-change-pushes-lobster-cod-and-other-species-north/ar-AAyYYmh">Fish
wars loom as climate change pushes lobster, cod, and other
species north</a></b><br>
Over the past 50 years, as Atlantic waters have warmed, fish
populations have headed north in search of colder temperatures.
Lobsters have migrated 170 miles and the iconic cod about 65 miles,
while mid-Atlantic species such as black sea bass have surged about
250 miles north, federal surveys show.<br>
But fishing limits and other rules, by and large, haven’t shifted
with them.<br>
The rapid movement of fisheries, in New England and around the
world, has outpaced regulations and exacerbated tensions between
fishermen in competing regions and countries, threatening to spark
conflicts that specialists fear could lead to overfishing.<br>
"This is a global problem that's going to be getting worse," said
Malin Pinsky, an assistant professor of ecology at Rutgers
University, who led a recently released study on the movement of
fisheries in the journal Science...<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/fish-wars-loom-as-climate-change-pushes-lobster-cod-and-other-species-north/ar-AAyYYmh">https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/fish-wars-loom-as-climate-change-pushes-lobster-cod-and-other-species-north/ar-AAyYYmh</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Audio interview with Bill McKibben]<b><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.thenation.com/article/catastrophic-climate-change-not-environmental-issue-bill-mckibben/">Catastrophic
Climate Change Is Not an 'Environmental' Issue: Bill McKibben</a></b><br>
It's the most crucial security question that humans have ever faced:
catastrophic climate change. Bill McKibben says it's too late to
halt global warming, but we still have a chance to curb it in ways
that ultimately avoid "civilizational destruction."<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.thenation.com/article/catastrophic-climate-change-not-environmental-issue-bill-mckibben/">https://www.thenation.com/article/catastrophic-climate-change-not-environmental-issue-bill-mckibben/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[A book review looks into the future - by The Nation]<br>
JULY 16-23, 2018, ISSUE<br>
States of Emergency<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.thenation.com/article/political-theory-for-an-age-of-climate-change/">Imagining
a politics for an age of accelerated climate change.</a></b><br>
By Alyssa Battistoni<br>
<blockquote>REVIEWED<br>
<b>CLIMATE LEVIATHAN: A POLITICAL THEORY OF OUR PLANETARY FUTURE</b><br>
By Geoff Mann and Joel Wainwright<br>
</blockquote>
Now that capitalism is again on the table as a political issue, it
also gets its share of blame. The political problem, it's now said,
isn't democracy alone, but rather that democracy is held hostage by
oil money and the politicians purchased by it. Even some capitalists
are starting to acknowledge that the system could use some tweaks.
(Others, like Elon Musk, are planning to decamp to Mars: the Great
Derangement indeed.) Swapping corporations for democracy as the root
of the problem is a welcome development. Yet serious political
thinking about climate change remains in short supply. Most people
are now worried about it, but few are putting climate change at the
heart of their political thought and practice. <br>
<br>
In this context, Geoff Mann and Joel Wainwright's new work of
political theory, Climate Leviathan, is a welcome addition to the
small but growing body of climate writing on the left. It's a book
explicitly aimed at understanding the political dimensions of
climate change instead of relegating them to a paragraph or two in
the concluding section. It also takes a different tack than most
works on climate politics. The authors are not interested in why we
aren't acting to curb carbon emissions; instead, they're interested
in the kinds of political scenarios that are likely to emerge in
response to the approaching ecological crises...<br>
- - - -<br>
Climate change, though a novel and previously unimaginable problem,
does not actually require a radical departure from traditional left
struggles for freedom, equality, and justice; it simply poses new
versions of familiar dilemmas. Our political thought doesn't need to
address climate change directly to offer insights into the role that
the left can play in responding to it, but we will need to develop
old ideas in new directions if we are to navigate a world that is
now changing radically.<br>
Toward this end, Climate Leviathan engages a wide range of political
thought, from Gramsci to Hegel, Kant to Naomi Klein. But as the
title suggests, at the heart of the book is Thomas Hobbes, whose
Leviathan remains the fundamental work on the sovereign power that
underpins modern states. Hobbes looked at a nation torn asunder by
the English Civil War and reckoned that it was better to relinquish
one's freedom to the authority of an all-powerful sovereign than to
live through such nastiness and brutality. Such a sovereign power
did not yet exist in Hobbes's time, but in describing it, Hobbes
sought to understand a political form that he thought might soon
come into being.<br>
<br>
Mann and Wainwright argue that we are in another such moment, a time
when political forms are in flux and one can begin to see the shape
of the growing leviathan. They therefore follow Hobbes into a
speculative mode, describing the forms of power they think are
likely to emerge in the future while recognizing that none have done
so yet.<br>
<br>
Their other key resource in thinking about this leviathan is the
German political theorist and Nazi sympathizer Carl Schmitt, who
draws on Hobbes in constructing his own theory of sovereignty.
Everyday decision-making is governed by law, Schmitt argues, but
sovereignty is to be found in the moments when emergency demands
extralegal action. For Schmitt, it was crucial that the sovereign be
able to take action against a community's enemies as it deemed
necessary. Sovereignty here consists of the political power that
allows a state to override the law in defense of its friends...<br>
- -- - - -<br>
Climate Leviathan imagines how ecological disruption will create the
conditions for a new sovereign authority to "seize command, declare
an emergency, and bring order to Earth, all in the name of saving
life" - and this time on a planetary instead of national scale.<br>
<br>
Yet this sovereignty is still nascent, and other political forms
might yet challenge it. At the core of Climate Leviathan are four
types of political formation that the authors believe are likely to
emerge in response to climate change. <br>
<blockquote><b>"Climate Leviathan"</b> would be a system of global
capitalism governed by a planetary sovereign - not necessarily the
individual ruler Hobbes imagined, but nevertheless a hegemonic
power capable of taking drastic action; <br>
<b>"Climate Mao,"</b> an anti-capitalist system governed by
sovereign power at the level of the nation-state or the planet; <br>
<b>"Climate Behemoth,"</b> a capitalist system within the
autarchic confines of the nation-state; and <br>
<b>"Climate X,"</b> which rejects both capitalism and sovereignty
for something yet to be determined.<br>
</blockquote>
These four possible futures, Mann and Wainwright admit, are thus
far inchoate. But as we blow past our carbon targets and the impacts
of climate change become increasingly destructive, one of these is
likely to emerge as the dominant mode of politics.<br>
<br>
The most likely victor, the authors think, is Climate Leviathan: It
is, after all, already in the ascendancy, epitomized by
international pacts like the Paris Agreement and global institutions
like the UN Conference of the Parties (COP). These institutions are
not currently sovereign in the Hobbesian sense; to the contrary,
they are explicitly international, working to coordinate action
between sovereign nation-states. But Mann and Wainwright think they
nevertheless point the way toward a form of sovereignty that has
been anticipated for centuries: one encompassing the world. Thinkers
from Kant to Einstein have typically imagined a world state in
response to the threat of war; Climate Leviathan would be just such
a world state in an age of ecological disaster.<br>
<br>
Rising temperatures will produce new emergencies, from tsunamis and
hurricanes to famines and refugee crises, and with them new
opportunities for powerful states to expand their reach by declaring
a state of exception. A major climate disaster could prompt northern
capitalist states to take action - up to and including
geoengineering - via the United Nations or a European Union-like
supranational authority. By calling for agreements at the annual
COPs, many climate activists have legitimized Climate Leviathan
rather than challenging it. But what these institutions cannot do,
Mann and Wainwright argue, is solve the climate crisis: They were
created to manage capitalism, and will continue to do so even in the
face of catastrophic warming.<br>
<br>
Yet while global capitalist institutions have been the primary site
of climate politics for the past two decades, Climate Leviathan has
a rival: Climate Behemoth represents a "reactionary populism" that
turns away from the global elitism of planetary forums on climate
change and toward a nationalist capitalism - a dynamic perfectly
encapsulated by Donald Trump's claim that he was "elected to
represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris."<br>
<br>
Visible in Trump's America, Narendra Modi's India, and the surge of
right-wing Euroskeptic parties across Europe, the backers of Climate
Behemoth are a mix of fossil-fuel capitalists, petit-bourgeois
reactionaries, and disillusioned working-class people who want to
stick it to the cosmopolitan elites and the political establishment.
Its contradictory but potent mix of ethno-nationalism, religion,
masculinity, and scientific denial make it a powerful but ultimately
unstable form; it is likely, Mann and Wainwright argue, to burn out
- but in the meantime, it could do plenty of damage.<br>
<br>
The revolutionary possibilities represented by Climate Mao and
Climate X, meanwhile, are less immediately proximate, visible at
present only in fragments. Climate Mao describes a revolutionary
transformation led by a noncapitalist state acting quickly to
address climate breakdown. In Mann and Wainwright's account, it
follows its namesake but also Robespierre and Lenin in suggesting
"the necessity of a just terror in the interests of the future of
the collective": It pits the power of the planetary sovereign
against that of capital. Climate Mao, that is, portends a renewal of
"authoritarian state socialisms" that act to reduce carbon emissions
and address climate emergencies, eventually on the level of the
planet.<br>
<br>
China's unilateral restrictions on corporations and citizens alike
show a glimpse of this future, though one not operating at full
strength. Indeed, Mann and Wainwright take pains to argue that China
isn't currently on a path toward Climate Mao. The Communist Party
can close steel mills in a matter of months to minimize emissions,
but China is no longer plausibly described as communist; to the
contrary, it has committed to working with the Western capitalist
powers to build the international system that characterizes Climate
Leviathan (think, for example, of Barack Obama's much-lauded
negotiations with Xi Jinping).<br>
<br>
Nevertheless, Mann and Wainwright insist that in the near future,
Climate Mao is only likely to emerge in Asia: Latin America may have
a more robust legacy of radical ecological politics, but only Asia
has the necessary combination of powerful states and major economies
paired with vast numbers of peasants, proletarians, and surplus
populations whose expectations are likely to be frustrated by the
disruptive effects of climate change. Only in Asia, in other words,
is it possible to imagine popular movements seizing state and
economic power in a way that would meaningfully affect the world's
use of resources...<br>
- - - - - - - -<br>
When Marx scorned the project of writing "recipes for the cook-shops
of the future," he called instead for a "critical analysis of actual
facts." The actual facts are not auspicious - yet we have no choice
but to face them. The threat posed by climate change demands that we
imagine a very different world, one that does not exist now and
never has; and one, moreover, that is not oriented toward our
current ideas of progress and the future. As each of these authors
observes, the threat posed by climate change requires political
action of a different order and magnitude than anything currently on
offer: Business as usual will not suffice. It is worrying that
thinkers so astute about the dynamics of capitalism and nature
appear stymied by how we can escape them. But they are undoubtedly
correct that climate change will shape politics for the foreseeable
future, which shrinks by the day.<br>
<br>
So while Mann and Wainwright and other supporters of a possible
Climate X need not draw blueprints, some hard questions demand
answering. How is the massive global fossil-fuel industry to be
dismantled without state coercion? How would an anti-sovereignty and
anti-capitalist movement prevent the enormously wealthy from
decamping to some reasonably stable patch of the world? How are
massive boycotts and strikes to be not just imagined but organized?
What's to prevent private coercion from replacing the public kind?<br>
<br>
Certainly, many on the left are too blithe about the state,
presumably on the grounds that you seize it first and ask questions
later. Those who tend to think that state power is necessary to
undertake the kinds of projects needed to address climate change
should say more, too: How do we think the "good state" of welfare
and public schools can be detached from the "bad state" of war and
prisons? How do we imagine actually winning enough state power to
usefully wield it? And how can we then transform it rather than
finding ourselves transformed by it?<br>
<br>
These are real questions, not rhetorical ones, and they have urgent
implications. Climate Leviathan helps us understand what they mean
and why they matter, and offers rich conceptual resources with which
to think them through. These questions will ultimately have to be
answered in practice more than in theory, but they deserve our
attention - and soon.<br>
<font size="-1">Alyssa BattistoniAlyssa Battistoni is a PhD
candidate in political theory at Yale University. Her writing has
appeared in Dissent, n+1, and Jacobin, where she is on the
editorial board.</font><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.thenation.com/article/political-theory-for-an-age-of-climate-change/">https://www.thenation.com/article/political-theory-for-an-age-of-climate-change/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[USAID Webinar June 28]<br>
Please join us for this month's USAID Adaptation Community Meeting,<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://adaptation.adobeconnect.com/june2018/">"Managing
for climate risk: Approaches and perspectives from the World
Bank, USAID, International Finance Corporation and
Inter-American Development Bank"</a></b><br>
The event will be held at Chemonics International located at 1717 H
Street Northwest Washington, DC 20006 from 4:00 - 5:30 pm on
Thursday June 28. <br>
A live webinar of the event will also be available here: <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://adaptation.adobeconnect.com/june2018/">https://adaptation.adobeconnect.com/june2018/</a>
<br>
<blockquote>Description: <br>
A changing and more variable climate, bringing with it
increasingly frequent, longer and more severe droughts, heat
waves, floods and extreme weather events, is putting the most
vulnerable populations at higher risk of disease, displacement,
and loss of livelihoods. Climate change also threatens to
undermine development interventions aimed at improving the lives
and livelihoods of vulnerable populations. To improve resilience
to both current and future climate, as well as safeguard
development gains, several leading organizations within the
international development community have implemented processes to
manage climate risk at various levels from high-level country
strategies to specific project activities. <br>
</blockquote>
At the June Adaptation Community Meeting, the United States Agency
for International Development (USAID), the World Bank, the
International Finance Corporation, and the Inter-American
Development Bank will come together to discuss each organization's
current and emerging approaches to climate risk management. The
discussion will highlight each organization's approach, initiatives
to track and assess the effectiveness of climate risk management,
lessons learned, and ideas for the future.<br>
Speakers<br>
Becky Chacko, Senior Climate Change Integration Specialist, USAID<br>
Ana Bucher, Senior Climate Change Specialist, World Bank<br>
David Gibson, Senior Environmental and Social Risk Management
Specialist, International Finance Corporation<br>
Maricarmen Esquivel Gallegos, Climate Change Specialist,
InterAmerican Development Bank <br>
Register for the event here -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.eventbrite.com/e/managing-for-climate-risk-approaches-and-perspectives-from-the-world-bank-usaid-international-tickets-47115658202">https://www.eventbrite.com/e/managing-for-climate-risk-approaches-and-perspectives-from-the-world-bank-usaid-international-tickets-47115658202</a><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://adaptation.adobeconnect.com/june2018/">https://adaptation.adobeconnect.com/june2018/</a>
</font><br>
<br>
<br>
[22 minute video from 2016]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWraEBec0Vg">Pakistan's
City with No Water | Unreported World</a></b><br>
Unreported World<br>
Published on Jun 10, 2018<br>
The City with no water: Imagine having to spend half your salary or
more buying water, sometimes only available illegally from
criminals. Or if water taps in your area only ran once a fortnight
in the middle of the night for less than two hours. That was the
situation for millions in the city of Karachi, Pakistan back in
2016, where climate change and mismanagement saw the supply of water
drastically reduced. Ordinary families were the hardest hit as
Fazeelat Aslam reported.<br>
This episode first aired on 01/04/2016.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWraEBec0Vg">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWraEBec0Vg</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Classic video documentary conveys deep understanding]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UuSxiCJ0co">Climate
Documentary: The Cross of the Moment</a></b><br>
Climate State<br>
Published on Sep 18, 2016<br>
The Cross of the Moment attempts to connect the dots between Fermi's
Paradox, climate change, capitalism, and collapse. Interviews with
top scientists and public intellectuals are woven together into a
narrative that is challenging, exhausting, and often depressing as
it refuses to accept the easy answers posited by other
overly-simplistic climate change documentaries.<br>
Directed by Jacob Freydont-Attie<br>
The Cross of the Moment on facebook <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.facebook.com/crossofthemoment/">https://www.facebook.com/crossofthemoment/</a><br>
Official website <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.crossofthemoment.com/">http://www.crossofthemoment.com/</a><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UuSxiCJ0co">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UuSxiCJ0co</a><br>
- -- - -<br>
</font>[appropos, poetic quote]<br>
"We would rather be ruined than changed<br>
We would rather die in our dread<br>
Than climb the cross of the moment<br>
And let our illusions die."<br>
- W.H. Auden, The Age of Anxiety<font size="-1"><br>
</font> <br>
<br>
[You mean it isn't now?]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.asyousow.org/newsletters/summer2018/starbucks-throwaway-cups-there-is-no-away">Starbucks'
Throwaway Cups - there is no "away"</a></b><br>
Coffee giant Starbucks uses between 8 and 10 million single-use
throwaway cups every day.<br>
But there is no "away" - there's only landfill, litter,
incineration, ocean trash - or recycling. Ten years ago, Starbucks
promised that by 2015, 100% of its cups would be reusable or
recyclable, 25% of beverages would be served in reusable containers,
and they'd have recycling capability in every store. It's 2018 and
the company's nowhere close.<br>
So this year shareholders spoke up, using a shareholder resolution
to demand that Starbucks accelerate and live up to its recycling
goals. Nearly 30% of Starbucks shares - worth $54 billion - voted in
favor. At the same time, grassroots activists presented the CEO with
a petition from nearly 1 million citizens asking the company to act.<br>
The combined power of shareholder pressure and grassroots activism
led the company to announce a $10 million effort to design a
recyclable and compostable cup - a good start. <br>
This powerful vote result means Starbucks knows it can't rest on its
mediocre performance. Because there is no "away," and the ocean
can't wait.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.asyousow.org/newsletters/summer2018/starbucks-throwaway-cups-there-is-no-away">https://www.asyousow.org/newsletters/summer2018/starbucks-throwaway-cups-there-is-no-away</a></font><br>
- - - - -<br>
[nudge by shares]<br>
<em style="word-wrap: break-word; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family:
basel-neue; font-size: 17.25px; font-variant-ligatures: normal;
font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing:
0.1725px; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px;
text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252); text-decoration-style:
initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"><b><a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://www.asyousow.org/">EMPOWERING
SHAREHOLDERS TO CHANGE CORPORATIONS FOR GOOD</a></b><br>
As You Sow</em><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family:
basel-neue; font-size: 17.25px; font-style: normal;
font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal;
font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: 0.1725px; orphans: 2;
text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(252, 252,
252); text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
initial; display: inline !important; float: none;"><span> </span>is
the nation's non-profit leader in shareholder advocacy. Founded in
1992, we harness shareholder power to create lasting change that
benefits people, planet, and profit.</span><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.asyousow.org/">https://www.asyousow.org/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
[Classic lecture on paleoclimatology]<br>
<b><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTTlAAiwgwM">AGU FM11 -
Paleoclimate record points toward potential rapid climate
changes</a></b><br>
American Geophysical Union (AGU)<br>
Published on Dec 6, 2011<br>
Press Conference from 2011 AGU Fall Meeting - Tue. 11 a.m. PST<br>
Even if we are able to limit global warming to two degrees Celsius
above pre-industrial times, Earth could likely see drastic and rapid
climate change this century, new research by NASA's Jim Hansen
suggests. Paleoclimate data paints a different picture than models
about the sensitivity of the climate system. Detailed analysis of
the Earth's paleoclimate history of recent interglacial periods
reveals we are less than a degree Celsius away from equaling a time
when sea level was several meters higher than it is today.<br>
Participants:<br>
James Hansen - Director, NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies,
New York, New York, USA;<br>
Ken Caldeira - Senior Scientist, Department of Global Ecology
Carnegie Institute of Washington, Stanford University, Stanford,
California, USA;<br>
Eelco Rohling - Professor of Ocean and Climate Change, Southampton
University, Southampton, United Kingdom.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTTlAAiwgwM">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTTlAAiwgwM</a><font
size="-1"><br>
</font>- - - - <br>
<b><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fl08NSgQ5nc">Some
Paleoclimate Perspectives: Dr Alex Thomas</a></b><br>
Understanding Climate Change<br>
Published on Jun 7, 2017<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fl08NSgQ5nc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fl08NSgQ5nc</a><br>
- - - - -<br>
[Rapid tipping of climate events - video talk]<br>
<b><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yTJZzQzdYI">Early
Warning of Climate Tipping Points: Prof Tim Lenton (September
2016)</a></b><br>
Understanding Climate Change<br>
Published on Oct 31, 2017<br>
Because the slides in the video are not very clear you can find most
of them on the following link if you want to see them more clearly.
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/3487lenton.pdf">https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/3487lenton.pdf</a><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yTJZzQzdYI">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yTJZzQzdYI</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/science/22cnd-climate.html?_r=0">This
Day in Climate History - June 22, 2006</a> - from D.R. Tucker</b></font><br>
June 22, 2006: <br>
The New York Times report on the National Academy of Sciences'
affirmation of Michael Mann's 1999 "hockey stick" paper.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/science/22cnd-climate.html?_r=0">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/science/22cnd-climate.html?_r=0</a> <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/the-world-is-heating-up/">http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/the-world-is-heating-up/</a> <br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><i>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html">Archive
of Daily Global Warming News</a> </i></font><i><br>
</i><span class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a></span><font
size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i><br>
</i></font></i></font><font size="+1"><i> <br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i>To receive daily
mailings - <a
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request">click
to Subscribe</a> </i></font>to news digest. </i></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><small> </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
</small><small> </small><br>
<small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes. </small><br>
<small>To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
with subject: subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject:
unsubscribe</small><br>
<small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may
subscribe/unsubscribe at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small>
</small><br>
<small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels.</small><small> L</small><small>ist
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</small></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>