<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><i>October 3, 2018</i></font><br>
<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://bluevirginia.us/2018/10/breaking-us-fourth-circuit-court-of-appeals-vacates-nationwide-permit-12-for-entire-mountain-valley-pipeline">BREAKING:
U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Vacates Nationwide Permit
12 for Entire Mountain Valley Pipeline</a></b><br>
By lowkell - October 2, 2018<br>
See below for the order issued a few minutes ago by the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on the Mountain Valley Pipeline
Clean Water Act Nationwide Permit 12 ("NWP 12"), vacating "in its
entirety, the [Army] Corps' verification of the [Mountain Valley
Pipeline's] compliance with NWP 12." Wow.<br>
<blockquote>"Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C.s
717r(d)(1), we conclude, for reasons to be more fully explained in
a forthcoming opinion, that the Corps lacked authority to
substitute the "dry cut" requirement "in lieu of" West Virginia's
72-hour temporal restriction. Accordingly, we VACATE, in its
entirety, the Corps' verification of the Pipeline's compliance
with NWP 12. "<br>
</blockquote>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bluevirginia.us/2018/10/breaking-us-fourth-circuit-court-of-appeals-vacates-nationwide-permit-12-for-entire-mountain-valley-pipeline">https://bluevirginia.us/2018/10/breaking-us-fourth-circuit-court-of-appeals-vacates-nationwide-permit-12-for-entire-mountain-valley-pipeline</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[compounding CO2 complexity]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/10/181001101709.htm">High
carbon dioxide levels cause plants to thicken their leaves,
could worsen climate change effects</a></b><br>
Date: October 1, 2018<br>
Source: University of Washington<br>
Summary: When levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere rise, most
plants do something unusual: They thicken their leaves. Now
scientists have shown that this reaction by plants will actually
worsen climate change by making the global 'carbon sink' contributed
by plants less productive.<br>
Plant scientists have observed that when levels of carbon dioxide in
the atmosphere rise, most plants do something unusual: They thicken
their leaves.<br>
And since human activity is raising atmospheric carbon dioxide
levels, thick-leafed plants appear to be in our future.<br>
But the consequences of this physiological response go far beyond
heftier leaves on many plants. Two University of Washington
scientists have discovered that plants with thicker leaves may
exacerbate the effects of climate change because they would be less
efficient in sequestering atmospheric carbon, a fact that climate
change models to date have not taken into account.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/10/181001101709.htm">https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/10/181001101709.htm</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Opinion from my states governor]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/02/opinions/how-to-show-trump-you-care-about-climate-change-inslee/index.html">How
to show Trump you care about climate change</a></b><br>
By Jay Inslee<br>
(CNN)While Donald Trump is blowing smoke on climate change, we here
in the West have been choking on it this summer. And if we don't
start electing people -- from city council to governor -- who are
willing to confront climate change, we're all going to pay dearly.<br>
In Washington state we know this from our own gasping experience.
For two weeks in August, the skies were shrouded in the darkest
smoke in recent memory, as record-breaking fires tore through the
Western states -- destroying communities and forcing widespread
evacuations. A thick, acrid and dangerous pall from hundreds of
fires filled the lungs of citizens trying to go about their lives.<br>
And this month climate change has brought more tragedy and
destruction to our country. Hurricane Florence hit North and South
Carolina with a combination of wind strength, rainfall and storm
surge that is unprecedented -- but increasingly expected -- for the
region.<br>
For millions of Americans, climate change is no longer just a chart
or a graph. It's wildfires. It's floodwater invading our homes and
drought destroying our crops. It's hurricanes and record-breaking
heat waves. It's an emerging new normal, one that we don't need to
accept as inevitable.<br>
Americans, we must start voting on climate change. We can in just a
few weeks, in voter initiatives and in elections for governors and
state legislatures throughout the country. That is because states
can lead the fight against the serious dangers posed by global
warming, building a safer future full of new and greater economic
opportunities, powered by fast-growing clean energy solutions like
wind and solar energy, and electric vehicles. It's happening
everywhere already.<br>
So, why is the Trump administration doing everything it can to
dismantle climate progress?<br>
In August Trump's EPA announced plans to repeal the Clean Power Plan
and allow power plants to dump unlimited carbon pollution into our
atmosphere, even though their own analysis shows this could lead to
as many as 1,400 more premature deaths each year.<br>
This follows the administration's plan to repeal the Clean Car
Standards, which would essentially force Americans to use more oil,
increase pollution from cars and trucks, and deliver a damaging blow
to our nation's auto industry in the global marketplace. And now
Trump's EPA wants to unravel rules that limit methane and even
mercury and toxic air pollution. Taken together these actions would
undo the most important steps America has ever taken to confront
climate change.<br>
Columnist Thomas Friedman recently argued that climate change should
be on the ballot in 2020 -- that our Democratic presidential nominee
should make fighting climate change and creating the jobs that flow
from investing in a clean energy economy front and center in our
national dialogue. He's right. But we cannot wait until 2020. Make
no mistake: Climate change is on the ballot in 2018.<br>
This year Americans can elect governors and state legislatures who
will push back, who will work to transform our nation's energy and
transportation systems and reduce the carbon pollution that is
harming our communities. They can vote for initiatives like I-1631
in my state that will finally hold polluters accountable.<br>
Americans don't have to wait for Washington, D.C. Donald Trump
cannot stop us in the states.<br>
Wealthy special interests have predictably argued that Washington
state's climate leadership would hurt our economy, but they've been
proven fantastically wrong; our state economy has been No. 1 in the
nation for the last two years, according to CNBC and Business
Insider.<br>
Clean energy is part of our growth story, as it is in other states.
Jobs in renewable energy are among the fastest growing in America.<br>
We in Washington state are not alone. Many constituencies are
joining forces across America to fight for climate action. The
Peoples Climate Movement is bringing together environmentalists,
labor unions, frontline communities, faith groups and others to
mobilize voters who will demand climate action rooted in racial and
economic justice. Governors across the country have joined to commit
their states to meet the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement. are
moving forward, despite Donald Trump. Soon more will join us.<br>
This November, I hope you will get out and vote for an American
clean energy future. Our children and grandchildren are counting on
us to act -- now.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/02/opinions/how-to-show-trump-you-care-about-climate-change-inslee/index.html">https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/02/opinions/how-to-show-trump-you-care-about-climate-change-inslee/index.html</a><br>
<br>
</font><br>
[McKibben speaks up]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/02/trump-administration-planet-boil-refugee-camps?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other">The
Trump administration knows the planet is going to boil. It
doesn't care</a></b><br>
Bill McKibben<br>
Trump's team used last week to sneak in disastrous, linked policies
on climate change and child refugee camps<br>
- - - - <br>
The author Todd Miller, writing in the Nation, described meeting men
trying to jump a train in Guatemala headed north toward the border.
"When I asked why they were heading for the United States, one
responded simply, "No hubo lluvia." ("There was no rain.")<br>
<br>
This will, of course, get steadily worse in the years ahead - every
climate forecast shows deserts spreading and water evaporating
across the region. And of course more migration will follow, in
every corner of the world. The World Bank predicts we may see 140
million climate migrants before long, and given the chaos that even
a million people fleeing the (partially drought-fueled) crisis in
Syria created, we better come to grips. Some of that migration will
be internal - perhaps six million people will abandon their coastal
property in Florida alone, according to recent reports. And much of
it will be international, as people flee because their lives depend
on it.<br>
<br>
Telling people to stay home is not an option - when there's no
water, or when the floods come each year, or when the sea rises into
your kitchen, people have to leave. Period.<br>
<br>
And telling people to stay home is not a moral option, either.
Because the climate chaos setting off waves of refugees is born
above all from the unconstrained migration of carbon dioxide
molecules from America over the last century. No wall can prevent
the exhaust from our armada of oversized cars from raising the
temperature in Mexico; if Guatemala could ship its changed climate
back north it doubtless would, but it can't. We have to realize that
global warming stems from the fact that we are a world without
atmospheric borders, where the people who have done the least to
cause the problem feel its horrors first and hardest. That's why,
over the last half-decade, the environmental and migrant-rights
movement have grown ever closer.<br>
<br>
The Trump years are a fantasy land where we pretend we can go on
living precisely as in the past, unwilling even to substitute
electric SUVs for our gas guzzlers, and able to somehow insist that
the rest of the world stay locked in place as well. It's
impractical, it's unfair, and when it ends up with camps for kids in
the desert it's downright evil.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/02/trump-administration-planet-boil-refugee-camps?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/02/trump-administration-planet-boil-refugee-camps?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[charts and graphs]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/decoupling/">The Great
Decoupling</a></b><br>
The story of energy use, economic growth, and carbon emissions in
four charts.<br>
By Rob Jackson, Josep Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Corinne Le Quéré,
and Glen Peters<br>
July 2017<br>
<blockquote> 1.Overall global energy use has risen fivefold within
one human lifetime.<br>
The history of energy use is like our closets. We don't typically
give up our belongings; we add to them. Coal didn't replace wood.
It supplemented wood as energy demands grew, overtaking it a
century ago. The same is true for oil and natural gas. Oil and gas
didn't end the coal era. They added to it<br>
<br>
2. Like energy use, carbon emissions historically have marched
resolutely upward--in lockstep with a robust global economy.
Economic crises have slowed the rise in emissions at times but
haven't stopped it.<br>
<br>
3. Now those trendlines are starting to diverge.<br>
For the past 15 years, global economic growth rose twice as fast
as global energy demand and CO2 emissions. The changes have been
the most dramatic since 2010. And within the past three years
(2014-2016), emissions stabilized--at least temporarily--while the
global economy continued growing. That is a first.<br>
<br>
4. Decoupling, however, is not a foregone conclusion. <br>
Our trajectory is good. Energy efficiency is responsible for most
of the decoupling to date. But the transformation to zero carbon
fuels must dramatically accelerate to keep up with growing energy
demands and increasing world population.<br>
</blockquote>
Only then will decoupling be complete.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/decoupling/">http://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/decoupling/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Wilson Center opinion]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2018/09/america-act-north-south-poles/">America
Must Act on the North and South Poles</a></b><br>
September 28, 2018 By David Balton <br>
The two poles of our planet--the Arctic and Antarctica--demand
greater attention right now. For decades, the United States has
played a leadership role in both regions, a responsibility that it
must continue to fulfill as a warming climate and other drivers of
change are creating new challenges and opportunities. Regrettably,
the Trump Administration has not devoted the resources or high-level
attention necessary to maintaining American leadership position on
these critical matters.<br>
<br>
During the height of the Cold War, visionary U.S. diplomacy under
President Eisenhower led to the creation of the Antarctic Treaty in
1959, a treaty that has successfully reserved that continent for
scientific research and other peaceful endeavors by banning all
military facilities and activities there. More recently, the United
States completed a successful term as chair of the Arctic Council, a
consensus-based body whose participants include the eight Arctic
states, representatives of Arctic indigenous peoples and almost
forty observer states and organizations.<br>
<br>
The Arctic Council has done valuable work in promoting environmental
research and developing pathways to sustainable, responsible
economic growth in the Arctic. Under U.S. leadership, the Council
has also served as the forum for negotiating three binding
agreements dealing with search and rescue, oil pollution and
scientific cooperation. America has also led in producing a
visionary agreement to prevent unregulated fishing in the Arctic
Ocean, pushed the International Maritime Organization to strengthen
rules for safe polar shipping, and spearheaded the creation of the
world's largest marine protected area in the Ross Sea off of
Antarctica.<br>
<br>
This brand of proactive, far-sighted U.S. leadership seems to be
faltering at a moment when developments in both areas require it
urgently. The alarming impacts of a warming climate at both
poles--and the consequences of such warming on the rest of the
world--are not "fake news." Rapidly rising temperatures in the North
are melting sea ice at record rates. Even more worrisome are two
positive feedback loops. First, less ice covering the sea and land
leads to less reflectivity of the sun's rays, which in turn leads to
more warming and increased melting. Second, the thawing permafrost
releases more greenhouse gases, also leading to greater warming.<br>
<br>
Just over a year ago, at a meeting chaired by former Secretary of
State Tillerson, foreign ministers from the Arctic States signed a
declaration acknowledging that the Arctic is warming at more than
twice the rate of the global average and that "the pace and scale of
continuing Arctic warming will depend on future emissions of
greenhouse gases." Three weeks later, the United States announced
its intention to withdraw from the Paris Agreement on climate
change.<br>
<br>
Already, rising seas and coastal erosion threaten coastal towns in
Alaska and in other parts of the Arctic and will force costly
relocations. The scientific community has produced compelling
evidence of the effects of polar warming on the rest of the planet,
including increasing storm surges, sea level rises and wildfires. If
more flashing red lights were needed, this summer's severe climatic
events and loss of life and property, exacerbated by the warming
poles, should be the wakeup call.<br>
<br>
We are witnessing unprecedented levels of human activity in the
Arctic Ocean<br>
Climate change has also made both polar areas, particularly the
Arctic, more accessible. We are witnessing unprecedented levels of
human activity in the Arctic Ocean, including commercial shipping
and tourism. Significant percentages of the world's untapped oil and
gas resources lie north of the Arctic Circle. Russia has taken
concrete actions to capitalize on these circumstances, particularly
by building infrastructure along the "Northern Sea Route" and
promoting hydrocarbon development. Earlier this year, China issued
its first Arctic strategy paper, making clear its intentions to play
a major part in the future of the Arctic region.<br>
<br>
The United States has not taken commensurate steps to improve
infrastructure in its portion of the Arctic. Only after much
prodding is Congress considering whether to allocate funds to build
at least one additional, badly needed heavy icebreaker, which--when
it would launch sometime in the mid-2020s--would bring the total
number of heavy U.S. icebreakers to two. Meanwhile, Russia has
forty-four operational icebreakers, with fifteen more planned or
under construction. The United States cannot be a polar power
without critical assets to support mobility and research in these
regions.<br>
<br>
Additionally, many of the key political-level positions in the
Administration responsible for polar policy remain unfilled,
including the relevant State Department Under Secretary and
Assistant Secretary and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration Administrator. Although President Trump recently
announced that he will nominate Kelvin Droegemeier to serve as his
Advisor on Science and Technology Policy, the White House Arctic
Executive Steering Committee has been dormant since the end of the
Obama Administration.<br>
<br>
Despite an uptick in reporting on these topics, most Americans
remain largely unaware of the importance of the Arctic and
Antarctica to their lives. How can the United States proceed?<br>
<br>
There are no easy fixes with America politically polarized, climate
science challenged and the political will lacking to take prudent
measures. But there are steps which can and should be taken.<font
size="-1"><br>
David Balton is Senior Fellow with the Wilson Center working with
the Polar Initiative. He served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Oceans and Fisheries in the Department of State, attaining the
rank of Ambassador in 2006.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2018/09/america-act-north-south-poles/">https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2018/09/america-act-north-south-poles/</a></font><br>
- - - -<br>
[for instance, Norway, Russia and Alaska]<br>
<b><a
href="https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2018/09/big-upgrade-worlds-northernmost-airstrip">Big
upgrade for world's northernmost airstrip</a></b><br>
The 2,500 meter long runway on the Nagurskoye base in Russia's Franz
Josef Land is getting a new and solid top layer which will open up
for year-round flights with heavy aircrafts.<br>
By Atle Staalesen - September 26, 2018<br>
A cargo ship with 13,000 tons of construction materials is on its
way to the Arctic archipelago. The "Yuri Arshenevsky" has been
loading for several days at the Murmansk Port and the cargo first of
all includes reinforced concrete plates and big bags with granulated
materials, the seaport informs.<br>
The ship will depart from Murmansk in the course of the 26th
September, the Russian Armed Forces inform.<br>
It is the second ship in few days that heads from Murmansk to the
Franz Josef Land...<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2018/09/big-upgrade-worlds-northernmost-airstrip">https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2018/09/big-upgrade-worlds-northernmost-airstrip</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[view Sea Level Rise differently]<br>
<b><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA5zh3yG_-0">Sea level
rise is so much more than melting ice</a></b><br>
Verge Science<br>
Published on Oct 2, 2018<br>
While researching climate change, we heard something confusing: the
sea level in New York City is rising about one and a half times
faster than the global average. We couldn't figure out what that
meant. Isn't the sea level...flat? So we called up an expert and
went down the rabbit hole. And, we did our best to visualize her
truly bizarre answers with animations, dioramas, and a lot of
melting ice.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA5zh3yG_-0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA5zh3yG_-0</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[What's for dinner?]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://ensia.com/articles/wild-greens/">INNOVATORS LOOK
TO "ACCIDENTAL CROPS" AS A NUTRITIOUS, ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY
AND FREE SOURCE OF FOOD</a></b><br>
Edible wild greens could help improve food security, boost public
health and make communities more resilient to disaster.<br>
- - - - <br>
"Once your brain starts to notice the environment that way -- once
plants are not just an undifferentiated sea of green -- you see the
plants everywhere."<br>
<br>
Edible wild greens are consumed globally, particularly during food
shortages, and many are used medicinally in teas, poultices and
supplements, Stark learned. But he found little about their
nutritional qualities. Living in the San Francisco area, he started
wondering if plants growing wild in cities -- not just on the trails
he ran and other less urban environments -- were safe to eat. If
some of them were, and if they were nutritious and free from
pollutants, he wondered if foraging could potentially help combat
food insecurity in cities, boost public health, and -- because he
lived in earthquake country -- boost communities' disaster
resilience.,,<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ensia.com/articles/wild-greens/">https://ensia.com/articles/wild-greens/</a><br>
- - - - <br>
</font>[yum, wild greens]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/08/06/385864">Open-Source
Food: Nutrition, Toxicology, and Availability of Wild Edible
Greens in the East Bay</a></b><br>
Abstract<br>
<blockquote>Significance. Foraged leafy greens are consumed around
the globe, including in urban areas, and may play a larger role
when food is scarce or expensive. It is thus important to assess
the safety and nutritional value of wild greens foraged in urban
environments. Methods. Field observations, soil tests, and
nutritional and toxicology tests on plant tissue were conducted
for three sites, each roughly 9 square blocks, in disadvantaged
neighborhoods in the East San Francisco Bay Area in 2014--2015.
The sites included mixed-use areas and areas with high vehicle
traffic. Results. Edible wild greens were abundant, even during
record droughts. Soil at some survey sites had elevated
concentrations of lead and cadmium, but tissue tests suggest that
rinsed greens are safe to eat. Daily consumption of standard
servings comprise less than the EPA reference doses of lead,
cadmium, and other heavy metals. Pesticides, glyphosate, and PCBs
were below detection limits. The nutrient density of 6 abundant
species compared favorably to that of the most nutritious
domesticated leafy greens. Conclusions. Wild edible greens
harvested in industrial, mixed-use, and high-traffic urban areas
in the San Francisco East Bay area are abundant and highly
nutritious. Even grown in soils with elevated levels of heavy
metals, tested species were safe to eat after rinsing in cold
water. Wild greens could contribute to nutrition, food security,
and sustainability in urban ecosystems.<br>
</blockquote>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/08/06/385864">https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/08/06/385864</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/11/101011fa_fact_lizza?printable=true#ixzz11K5nMoZ9">This
Day in Climate History - October 3, 2010</a> - from D.R.
Tucker</b></font><br>
October 3, 2010: NewYorker.com posts Ryan Lizza's analysis of the
demise of climate legislation in the Senate earlier in the year. The
piece, which also appears in the October 11 edition of the New
Yorker, notes that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was concerned about
being rhetorically assaulted by right-wing media entities for
supporting the climate bill:<br>
<blockquote>"At a climate-change conference in South Carolina on
January 5, 2010, Graham started to sound a little like Al Gore. 'I
have come to conclude that greenhouse gases and carbon pollution'
are 'not a good thing,' Graham said. He insisted that nobody could
convince him that 'all the cars and trucks and plants that have
been in existence since the Industrial Revolution, spewing out
carbon day in and day out,' could be 'a good thing for your
children and the future of the planet.' Environmentalists swooned.
'Graham was the most inspirational part of that triumvirate
throughout the fall and winter,' Michael Brune, the executive
director of the Sierra Club, said. 'He was advocating for strong
action on climate change from an ethical and a moral perspective.'<br>
<br>
"But, back in Washington, Graham warned Lieberman and Kerry that
they needed to get as far as they could in negotiating the bill
'before Fox News got wind of the fact that this was a serious
process,' one of the people involved in the negotiations said.'"<br>
</blockquote>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/11/101011fa_fact_lizza?printable=true#ixzz11K5nMoZ9">http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/11/101011fa_fact_lizza?printable=true#ixzz11K5nMoZ9</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><i>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html">Archive
of Daily Global Warming News</a> </i></font><i><br>
</i><span class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a></span><font
size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i><br>
</i></font></i></font><font size="+1"><i> <br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i>To receive daily
mailings - <a
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request">click
to Subscribe</a> </i></font>to news digest. </i></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><small> </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
</small><small> </small><br>
<small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes. </small><br>
<small>To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
with subject: subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject:
unsubscribe</small><br>
<small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may
subscribe/unsubscribe at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small>
</small><br>
<small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels.</small><small> L</small><small>ist
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</small></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>