<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><i>October 25, 2018</i></font><br>
<br>
[New York State Attorney General sues Exxon]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/ag-underwood-files-lawsuit-against-exxonmobil-defrauding-investors-regarding-financial">A.G.
Underwood Files Lawsuit Against Exxonmobil For Defrauding
Investors Regarding Financial Risk The Company Faces From
Climate Change Regulations </a></b><br>
Investigation into Exxon's Business Practices Uncovered an Alleged
Fraudulent Scheme to Systematically and Repeatedly Deceive Investors
About the Significant Impact That Future Climate Change Regulations
Could Have on the Company's Assets and Value<br>
Alleged Fraud Reached Highest Levels, as former Chairman and CEO Rex
Tillerson Knew of Misrepresentations for Years<br>
NEW YORK - Attorney General Barbara D. Underwood today announced a
lawsuit against Exxon Mobil Corporation ("Exxon"), alleging that the
company misled investors regarding the risk that climate change
regulations posed to its business...<br>
- - -- <br>
Exxon continued to present that analysis to investors even after
being warned by the author of a study upon which it purported to
rely that the analysis was "misleading."<br>
The impact of Exxon's alleged fraud on the company's value is
significant in scale and scope. For example:<br>
<blockquote>- For 14 of Exxon's oil sands projects in Alberta,
Canada, Exxon's failure to apply its publicly represented proxy
costs resulted in undercounting of projected greenhouse-gas
related expenses by more than $25 billion over the projected
lifetime of the projects.<br>
- Exxon undercounted projected greenhouse gas-related costs by as
much as 94% - equal to about $11 billion - in an economic forecast
for its Kearl oil sands asset in Alberta.<br>
- Exxon failed to apply the proxy costs it represented to the
public in estimating company reserves at Cold Lake, a major oil
sands asset in Alberta, resulting in an overestimation of its
projected economic life by 28 years, and an overestimation of
company reserves volumes by more than 300 million oil-equivalent
barrels, representing billions of dollars of revenues.<br>
</blockquote>
The lawsuit announced today was filed in New York Supreme Court, New
York County. The suit seeks an order prohibiting Exxon from
continuing to misrepresent its practices in this area, and requiring
it to correct its past misrepresentations; in other words, to tell
investors the truth. The suit also asks the court to award damages,
a disgorgement of all monies obtained in connection with the alleged
fraud, and restitution. Additionally, the complaint requests the
court to direct a comprehensive review of Exxon's failure to apply a
proxy cost consistent with its representations, and the economic and
financial consequences of that failure. <br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/ag-underwood-files-lawsuit-against-exxonmobil-defrauding-investors-regarding-financial">https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/ag-underwood-files-lawsuit-against-exxonmobil-defrauding-investors-regarding-financial</a></font>
<br>
- - -<br>
AG tweets: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://twitter.com/NewYorkStateAG/status/1055145833593794561">https://twitter.com/NewYorkStateAG/status/1055145833593794561</a><br>
AG statement: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/ag-underwood-files-lawsuit-against-exxonmobil-defrauding-investors-regarding-financial">https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/ag-underwood-files-lawsuit-against-exxonmobil-defrauding-investors-regarding-financial</a><br>
NYT: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/24/climate/exxon-lawsuit-climate-change.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/24/climate/exxon-lawsuit-climate-change.html</a><br>
My quick take, summing up what AG seems to be alleging: <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://twitter.com/GeoffreySupran/status/1055152188039798785">https://twitter.com/GeoffreySupran/status/1055152188039798785</a><br>
- - - <br>
[NYT Opinion from Supran and Oreskes]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/22/opinion/exxon-climate-change-.html">What
Exxon Mobil Didn't Say About Climate Change</a></b><br>
By Geoffrey Supran and Naomi Oreskes<br>
Aug. 22, 2017<br>
- - - -<br>
<b>"Read the documents," the company said, "and make up your own
mind."</b><br>
A year ago we took up this challenge. We have read all of the
documents, analyzed them according to established social science
methods, and made up our minds. Today, we are publishing <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f">the
results of our peer-reviewed analysis in the journal Environmental
Research Letters.</a> To our knowledge, this is the first
academic, empirical analysis of Exxon Mobil's 40-year history of
climate change communications. (Our research was funded by Harvard
University Faculty Development Funds and by the Rockefeller Family
Fund, which also helped finance the reporting by Inside Climate News
and the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, which
published its examination of Exxon Mobil with The Los Angeles
Times.)<br>
<br>
Our findings are clear: Exxon Mobil misled the public about the
state of climate science and its implications. Available documents
show a systematic, quantifiable discrepancy between what Exxon
Mobil's scientists and executives discussed about climate change in
private and in academic circles, and what it presented to the
general public.<br>
<br>
We applied an empirical method known as content analysis to all
relevant, publicly available internal company files that have led to
allegations against Exxon Mobil, as well as all peer-reviewed and
non-peer-reviewed publications offered by the company in response.
We also analyzed 36 of the company's paid "advertorials" about
climate change that appeared as editorial-style advertisements on
the Op-Ed pages of The New York Times between 1989 and 2004.<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/22/opinion/exxon-climate-change-.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/22/opinion/exxon-climate-change-.html</a></font><br>
- - - -<br>
[Research Letter]<br>
Assessing ExxonMobil's climate change communication<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f">http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Opinion from the top climate scientist]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/24/opinion/climate-change-global-warming-trump.html">How
Scientists Cracked the Climate Change Case</a></b><br>
The biggest crime scene on the planet is the planet. We know the
earth is warming, but who or what is causing it?<br>
By Gavin Schmidt<br>
Dr. Schmidt is the director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space
Studies.<br>
Oct. 24, 2018<br>
- - - -<br>
For the past 100 years we have documented good, independently
confirmed observations of change at the surface of the planet, and
for the past 40 years satellites and comprehensive measuring efforts
have provided a much fuller view of changes throughout the earth
system. These observations show clearly that among other things, the
surface of the planet has warmed, the upper atmosphere has cooled,
the oceans are gaining an enormous amount of heat, sea level is
rising, Arctic ice has greatly receded and glaciers around the world
are in retreat. <br>
- - - <br>
Like forensic detectives, climate scientists have developed a new
array of tools in recent decades designed to skillfully calculate
what the fingerprints of these changes look like, and more
important, how they differ from one another. It turns out that
increases in solar activity produce warming throughout the
atmosphere, while carbon dioxide increases cooling in the upper
atmosphere and warms the surface. Variations in ocean circulation
distribute heat, while changes in the sun or in greenhouse gases
change the total heat amount in the system. Air pollution, volcanoes
and irrigation all cool the climate, while rising greenhouse gases
warm it. Ozone depletion has increased the speed of the winds around
Antarctica, affecting ocean circulation and sea ice. <br>
<br>
But even taking into account uncertainties in the amount of air
pollution in the 19th century or in estimating global temperatures
through time, scientists have concluded that the current warmth is
impossible to explain without human contributions. It is on a par
with the likelihood that a DNA match at a crime scene is purely
coincidental. Moreover, when we include the multiplicity of human
effects, we match them with the observed trends at the surface, in
the Arctic, in the ocean and aloft. The dominant factor that emerges
is the rise in greenhouse gases, which we know comes mainly from the
burning of fossil fuels and deforestation. <br>
Even more convincingly, these trends aren't just being attributed in
hindsight. The rate of surface warming <a class="css-1g7m0tk"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warming"
title="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">was predicted</a>
in the 1980s, the cooling in the upper atmosphere was forecast in <a
class="css-1g7m0tk"
href="https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/1520-0469%281967%29024%3C0241%3ATEOTAW%3E2.0.CO%3B2"
title="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">a 1967
scientific paper</a>, and <a class="css-1g7m0tk"
href="https://www.nature.com/articles/35066553" title=""
rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">specific measurements</a>
from space indicate that the total greenhouse effect has been
enhanced exactly as theory would predict.<br>
<br>
When this is all put together, the conclusions are inescapable:
Without human activities the planet would not have warmed over the
past century. When scientists include all of the effects that humans
have had on the climate system, they can match them with these many
independent and varied observations. Our best assessment is
therefore that humans, at least the ones responsible for the bulk of
carbon dioxide emissions, have been responsible for all of the
recent trends in global temperatures.<br>
<br>
The forensics have spoken, and we are to blame.<br>
<font size="-1">more at
-https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/24/opinion/climate-change-global-warming-trump.html</font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Hot winter in the Pacific NW]<br>
Climate Denial Crock of the Week with Peter Sinclair<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2018/10/24/kelp-forests-collapse-as-the-blob-returns/">Kelp
Forests Collapse as The Blob Returns</a></b><br>
October 24, 2018<br>
A large area of warm water in the northern Pacific, nicknamed "the
Blob", hung around for a few years, exacerbating the California
drought of the past decade. I covered it in this 2015 video.<br>
Now it's back - and we're just starting to appreciate the damage
it's doing.<br>
- - -<br>
[video explanation from 2015 still correct]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://youtu.be/R6RaAYA9OMA">California's
Drought: Beware of the Blob</a></b><br>
YaleClimateConnections<br>
Published on May 5, 2015<br>
California's drought is part of a larger pattern that has brought
consecutive cold winters to Eastern North America, and formed an
area of warm water in the Northeastern Pacific, that scientists call
"the Blob".<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://youtu.be/R6RaAYA9OMA">https://youtu.be/R6RaAYA9OMA</a></font><br>
- - -<br>
The trouble began with the starfish. Sunflower starfish, whose
appendages can span more than three feet, normally eat purple
urchins, helping to limit their numbers.<br>
But in 2013, the starfish mysteriously began dying. There isn't
scientific consensus on why, but Drew Harvell, a professor of
ecology and evolutionary biology at Cornell University, said she
thought that a virus was at least partly to blame and that warmer
waters had exacerbated its effects.<br>
Sea otters, another predator of purple urchins, were hunted to near
extinction in Northern California by 19th-century fur traders. Their
numbers have not rebounded.<br>
<br>
Around the same time as the starfish began dying, a mass of warm
water appeared hundreds of miles off Alaska, British Columbia,
Washington and Oregon. By 2014 that warm water had moved toward
land, stretching from Southeastern Alaska down to Mexico.<br>
<br>
The marine heat wave was hotter than anything humans had recorded
dating back to the late 1800s. Researchers and locals called it "the
Blob." It would last into 2016.<br>
<br>
"Human-caused global warming made it much more likely to get as
extreme as it did," said Nathan Mantua, a physical scientist at the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and an author of a
study linking the Blob to climate change. Over 90 percent of the
heat trapped on Earth because of the greenhouse gases emitted by
humans has been absorbed by the ocean, increasing its temperature.<br>
<br>
But kelp prefers cooler waters...<br>
- - -<br>
"We don't know very much about them because they're very
mysterious," Dr. Hofmann said. "But we've done a little work on them
and they do not like high temperatures."...<br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatecrocks.com/2018/10/24/kelp-forests-collapse-as-the-blob-returns/">https://climatecrocks.com/2018/10/24/kelp-forests-collapse-as-the-blob-returns/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Changed reality too]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/10/climate-change-damaging-american-democracy/573769/">Climate
Change Is Already Damaging American Democracy</a></b><br>
Major disasters and challenging long-term weather conditions are
weakening local governments, increasing racial and class inequality,
and reducing trust in government.<br>
VANN R. NEWKIRK II<br>
- - -<br>
Donald Trump is a character of the moment. He's a developer with
famous properties in New York, New Jersey, and Miami, during a time
when developers in flooding areas have been ceded more and more
local control. He's the culmination of a crisis of faith in
government and widening racial differences in opinion over the
future, both of which can possibly be traced back to the aftermath
of Hurricane Katrina. The political polarization and gerrymandering
that enabled both his ascent and the strength of his party in
Congress were most certainly aided by the displacement of people of
color from cities over the past few decades. He's the natural
political conclusion of widening class and racial wealth gaps, and
the heir of a system in which state and local governments have more
regularly faced budget shortfalls. And climate change contributed
to, contributes to, or will contribute to each of these in due time.<br>
"It's a crisis that we can still deal with if we wake up," Zaelke
says. But the awakening doesn't just mean accepting the science, and
in the American context doesn't just mean finally overcoming the
grip of climate denialism on politics. In the IPCC's reading, and in
the telling of several of the most vocal climate activists, the
changes that the world must undertake in order to rein in climate
change will be "unprecedented" and will require monumental shifts in
governance and economics.<br>
<br>
By all accounts, the task ahead is a moonshot. But perhaps the
familiarity of the challenges before the country provide an
opportunity. The disasters predicted under even the worst-case
scenarios aren't supernatural; rather, they are macro-level
disturbances created by millions of local, often imperceptible
perturbances. The cracks of inequality that look likely to widen
into chasms of autocracy in the next century were all created by
humans, and can all be conquered by them, too.<br>
<font size="-1">more at - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/10/climate-change-damaging-american-democracy/573769/">https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/10/climate-change-damaging-american-democracy/573769/</a></font><br>
<br>
<br>
[Opinion]<br>
<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/10/trump-the-first-demagogue-of-the-anthropocene/504134/">Donald
Trump Is the First Demagogue of the Anthropocene</a></b><br>
He won't be the last.<br>
ROBINSON MEYER - OCT 19, 2016<br>
- - -<br>
Climate change could push Western politics toward demagoguery and
authoritarianism in two ways, then. First, it could devastate
agricultural yields and raise food prices; destroy coastal real
estate and wash away family wealth; transform old commodities into
luxury goods. Second, it could create a wave of migration—likely
from conflict, but possibly from environmental ruination—that
stresses international reception systems and risks fomenting
regional resource disputes.<br>
<br>
In effect, it could erode people's sense of security, pushing them
toward authoritarianism...<br>
- - -<br>
Schleussner and his colleagues also allude to a nightmare scenario
in the paper itself, though they couch it in clinical language:
"Further destabilization of Northern Africa and the Levant may have
widespread effects by triggering migration flows to neighboring
countries and remote migrant destinations such as the European
Union."<br>
<br>
In other words, a drought-and-flood-fueled armed conflict near the
Mediterranean Basin could send people toward Western Europe in the
hundreds of millions. This is the "1930s all over again" scenario
that Kerry mentioned, the one playing out in miniature right now,
made all the worse through the aggravation of a climate-changed
world.<br>
<br>
Never mind armed conflict. Could disastrous environmental upheaval
produce mass migration all by itself?...<br>
- - -<br>
Indeed, climate change may already be driving mass migrations. Last
year, the Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley was
mocked for suggesting that a climate-change-intensified drought in
the Levant—the worst drought in 900 years—helped incite the Syrian
Civil War, thus kickstarting the Islamic State. The evidence
tentatively supports him. Since the outbreak of the conflict, some
scholars have recognized that this drought pushed once-prosperous
farmers into Syria's cities. Many became unemployed and destitute,
aggravating internal divisions in the run-up to the war.<br>
<br>
Scheffran underlined these climate connections but declined to
emphasize them. "The Syrian War has so many complex interrelated
issues—and most of them are political and economic—that the drought
is just one contributing factor to the instability in the region,"
he said...<br>
- - <br>
The only social or political act that most of these explainers will
propose is this: You should vote for candidates who understand
climate science and who will act to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
(In the United States, and in no other developed country, that only
describes the candidates of one major political party.)<br>
<br>
It makes sense to put voting in that list because, really, all
those technological actions resemble voting—they are all essentially
just types of harm reduction. At worst, skipping beef or buying
carbon credits is an ethically valuable but economically worthless
gesture; at best, it modestly helps avoid a much worse outcome.<br>
<br>
But Trump's success in the primary among the civically disintegrated
suggests another way forward. Improving the United States's immune
response to authoritarian leadership—a response that could be
repeatedly tested in the century to come—can follow from weaving its
civic fabric ever tighter. I don't know what this will look like,
exactly, for every person. But here are some places to start:
Volunteer. Run for local or state office. Give to charity (whether
due to religion or effective altruism). Organize at work. Join a
church or a community choir or the local library staff. Make your
hometown a better place for refugees to settle. Raise a child well.<br>
<br>
These may seem inconsequential, tasks unrelated to the final goal of
restricting how much carbon dioxide enters the environment. And,
admittedly, they are. But climate realists have always split their
work between mitigation—that is, trying to keep the climate from
getting worse—and adaptation—trying to protect what we already have.
As more warming gets baked into the biosphere, as seas rise and
livelihoods fall, these prosaic steps will become vital forms of
adaptation.<br>
<br>
Climate mitigation is a worthy goal in itself. It is all the more
important when understood as one more type of long-term
anti-fascism.<br>
<font size="-1">ROBINSON MEYER is a staff writer at The Atlantic,
where he covers climate change and technology.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/10/trump-the-first-demagogue-of-the-anthropocene/504134/">https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/10/trump-the-first-demagogue-of-the-anthropocene/504134/</a><br>
<br>
</font><br>
[Time to understand why]<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mailchi.mp/23b6533dbb97/unpsychology-magazine-4-climate-minds">Get
Climate Minds Anthology FREE</a><br>
This bumper issue has over 160 pages of fiction, poetry, prose,
essays FREE, and you can download it below. Climate Minds is the
fourth edition of Unpsychology Magazine and includes essays,
illustration, poetry, prose and fiction from a wide range of
writers, artists and activists - all responding to the psychological
implications of climate change for human and non-human life, now and
into the future. Sign up below, and you'll also get a FREE copy of
Unpsychology 1. To find out more about the Unpsychology project go
to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="http://www.unpsychology.org">www.unpsychology.org</a> and <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://medium.com/soul-making">https://medium.com/soul-making</a><br>
<font size="-1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://mailchi.mp/23b6533dbb97/unpsychology-magazine-4-climate-minds">https://mailchi.mp/23b6533dbb97/unpsychology-magazine-4-climate-minds</a><br>
- - - -<br>
[classic essay]<b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://medium.com/soul-making/the-destruction-of-experience-how-ecopsychology-has-failed-ccae9f36d7a4"><br>
</a></b></font><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://medium.com/soul-making/the-destruction-of-experience-how-ecopsychology-has-failed-ccae9f36d7a4">The
Destruction of Experience: How Ecopsychology Has Failed</a></b><br>
By Will Falk<br>
- - -<br>
But, civilization is not a mental event. Civilization is a global,
physical process that is destroying the planet. While it is
producing climate change, ocean acidification, massive deforestation
and desertification, there is nowhere to escape.<br>
<br>
Unfortunately, too many students of ecopsychology who recognize
this, instead of facing the need to physically dismantle the systems
causing this collapse, too often retreat to the position that only
personal therapy is possible and that the planet can only be saved
by curing one mind at a time...<br>
- - -<br>
The answer is found in the strength of the very ideology
ecopsychology seeks to undermine. Planetary destruction is reduced
to an ailment in individual human minds. While ecopsychology wisely
recognizes that the human mind is formed by material relationships
and that physical threats to these material relationships are
physical threats to the human mind, when ecopsychologists concern
themselves primarily with psychotherapy they contribute very little
to the effort to prevent psychopathology. Ecological psychotherapy,
as a practice to heal mentally ill individuals, is merely a bandaid
over a gunshot wound.<br>
The natural world does not need more ecotherapists, it needs
ecomilitants. It needs strategic, organized resistance to
civilization. I say this as someone whose life has been saved by
ecotherapy. My life and the lives of those lucky few privileged
enough to gain access to ecotherapy are nothing compared to
annihilation of life on Earth. If we do not concentrate all our
efforts at physically toppling the systems destroying the planet, no
amount of therapy is going to save us.<br>
<br>
I recall the starlight on Thomas' peacefully sleeping face. I don't
want my nephew to experience the illnesses causing someone to seek
the services of a therapist — ecological or otherwise. I want him to
live in a world where the physical richness of his experience
guarantees his healthy psychological development.<b> I want him to
live in a world that isn't being destroyed.</b><br>
Will Falk is a writer, lawyer, and environmental activist<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://medium.com/soul-making/the-destruction-of-experience-how-ecopsychology-has-failed-ccae9f36d7a4">https://medium.com/soul-making/the-destruction-of-experience-how-ecopsychology-has-failed-ccae9f36d7a4</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.msnbc.com/the-cycle/watch/hurricane-sandy-one-year-later-56848963789#">This
Day in Climate History - October 25, 2013</a> - from D.R.
Tucker</b></font><br>
October 25, 2013: On MSNBC's "The Cycle," writer David Gessner
discusses the grotesque legacy of Superstorm Sandy.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.msnbc.com/the-cycle/watch/hurricane-sandy-one-year-later-56848963789#">http://www.msnbc.com/the-cycle/watch/hurricane-sandy-one-year-later-56848963789#</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="+1"><i>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html">Archive
of Daily Global Warming News</a> </i></font><i><br>
</i><span class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a></span><font
size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i><br>
</i></font></i></font><font size="+1"><i> <br>
</i></font><font size="+1"><i><font size="+1"><i>To receive daily
mailings - <a
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request">click
to Subscribe</a> </i></font>to news digest. </i></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><small> </small><small><b>** Privacy and Security: </b>
This is a text-only mailing that carries no images which may
originate from remote servers. </small><small> Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.
</small><small> </small><br>
<small> By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used
for democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for
commercial purposes. </small><br>
<small>To subscribe, email: <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
with subject: subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject:
unsubscribe</small><br>
<small> Also you</small><font size="-1"> may
subscribe/unsubscribe at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a></font><small>
</small><br>
<small> </small><small>Links and headlines assembled and
curated by Richard Pauli</small><small> for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels.</small><small> L</small><small>ist
membership is confidential and records are scrupulously
restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</small></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>