<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><i><font size="+1"><b>August 18, 2020</b></font></i><br>
</p>
[Financial Times opinion from UK]<br>
<b>Biden gambles on placing climate change at heart of US energy
policy</b><br>
Republicans say the promise to invest $2tn in green energy threatens
tens of thousands of jobs in oil and gas sector<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.ft.com/content/2ac477e7-34a4-4c0e-b9f4-018cef47d67d">https://www.ft.com/content/2ac477e7-34a4-4c0e-b9f4-018cef47d67d</a>
<p><br>
</p>
[New platform]<br>
<b>Biden's climate fight is just beginning</b><br>
- - <br>
"If Biden had just run with his original climate plan, it still
would have been more ambitious than any nominee ever," said
Hendricks, crediting the Biden team with strong outreach that
expanded his plan and his coalition.<br>
<br>
"He didn't get public accolades for that. What he got was a better
policy and an important champion for how this policy is going to hit
the ground."<br>
<br>
In the plan's top lines, Biden calls for decarbonizing the economy
by 2050, though he advanced that deadline to 2035 for utilities
following outside recommendations. It includes a strong
environmental justice component to hold polluters accountable and
route funding to communities overburdened by them, and it envisions
creating jobs by investing in clean energy, clean transit and the
manufacturing sector behind them.<br>
But there's already been some grumbling from environmental
organizations that he hasn't done enough to address fracking or hit
the fossil fuel industry, though one of President Trump's favorite
lines of attack on Biden is that he wants to ban fracking and would
be horrible for the oil and gas industry.<br>
<br>
If Biden wins, groups such as Greenpeace have called on him to
exclude oil and gas executives from his transition team<br>
Some of Biden's climate moves, including reentering the Paris
climate accord, could be done by executive action on day one.<br>
<br>
But many would require buy-in from Congress. That prospect that
could be dead in the water if Republicans hold the Senate, while
Biden's plan might not go far enough for many in a
Democratic-majority House...<br>
more at -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/511889-bidens-climate-fight-is-just-beginning">https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/511889-bidens-climate-fight-is-just-beginning</a>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Podcast - audio from the Guardian]<br>
<b>The return of Extinction Rebellion</b><b><br>
</b>When Extinction Rebellion began holding protests two years ago,
the movement could not have predicted its rapid growth or the public
support it received. But missteps and the Covid-19 shutdown meant
the group lost momentum. Now, it is planning a series of new actions
in the autumn<br>
Extinction Rebellion (XR) has grown rapidly since it was set up in
the UK in 2018. Its early protests had a carnival atmosphere and its
demands were simple: the government should, above all else, be
truthful about the extent of the climate crisis.<br>
<br>
Daze Aghaji started attending XR meetings while still at university
and became an influential member of the group's youth wing. She
describes the participatory structure and how decisions are made
without a formal leadership – and how XR has grappled with racial
equality within its movement. The Guardian's Matthew Taylor has been
following XR since the beginning and is observing it enter a new
phase of its evolution. Can it recreate the atmosphere of its early
protests and avoid some of the recent controversies and missteps,
while still growing as a mass movement?...<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/audio/2020/aug/17/covid-19-climate-crisis-and-return-extinction-rebellion-podcast">https://www.theguardian.com/environment/audio/2020/aug/17/covid-19-climate-crisis-and-return-extinction-rebellion-podcast</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>["Absolutely bonkers"]<br>
<b>Trump Administration Finalizes Plan to Open Arctic Refuge to
Drilling</b><br>
The decision sets up a fierce legal battle over the fate of a
vast, remote area that is home to polar bears, caribou and the
promise of oil wealth...<br>
"There's no good time to open up America's largest wildlife refuge
to drilling and fracking, but it's absolutely bonkers to endanger
this beautiful place during a worldwide oil glut," said Kristen
Monsell, a senior attorney with the Center for Biological
Diversity, an environmental group.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/17/climate/alaska-oil-drilling-anwr.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/17/climate/alaska-oil-drilling-anwr.html</a></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[A rare type of weather becoming more common]<br>
<b>Extreme weather just devastated 10m acres in the midwest. Expect
more of this</b><br>
Art Cullen<br>
I know a stiff wind. They call this place Storm Lake, after all. But
until recently most Iowans had never heard of a "derecho". They have
now. Last Monday, a derecho tore 770 miles from Nebraska to Indiana
and left a path of destruction up to 50 miles wide over 10m acres of
prime cropland. It blew 113 miles per hour at the Quad Cities on the
Mississippi River.<br>
Grain bins were crumpled like aluminum foil. Three hundred thousand
people remained without power in Iowa and Illinois on Friday. Cedar
Rapids and Iowa City were devastated.<br>
<br>
The corn lay flat.<br>
<br>
Iowa's maize yield may be cut in half. A little napkin ciphering
tells me the Tall Corn State will lose $6bn from crop damage alone.<br>
<br>
We should get used to it. Extreme weather is the new normal. Last
year, the villages of Hamburg and Pacific Junction, Iowa, were
washed down the Missouri River from epic floods that scoured tens of
thousands of acres. This year, the Great Plains are burning up from
drought. Western Iowa was steeped in severe drought when those
straight-line winds barreled through the weak stalks.<br>
A multi-decade drought is under way in the Central Plains and the
south-west. Wildfires are spreading from Arizona to California, and
are burning ridges north of Los Angeles not licked by flames since
1968. Cattle in huge Kansas, Texas and Oklahoma feedlots will drink
the Ogallala Aquifer dry in 20 years. This drought, which could
rival or exceed the Medieval Drought that occurred about AD1200,
could last 30 to 50 years, according to research from the Goddard
Space Institute. It will become difficult to grow corn in southern
Iowa, and impossible in western Kansas. By mid-century, corn yields
could decline by 30%, according to the Iowa State University
climatologist Dr Gene Takle.<br>
<br>
Takle notes that the 20th century was the wettest on record. This
could be the driest.<br>
"The last century was our Goldilocks period," Takle said. "Just
right. And that period is coming to an end."<br>
<br>
We have cyclone bombs in winter and derechos on top of tornadoes. We
have 500-year floods every 10 years. And we have a steady increase
in night-time temperatures and humidity that makes it difficult for
the corn to breathe even with the latest in genetic engineering.
Protein content in the kernel is falling. Livestock and plants fall
prey to new diseases and pests along with extreme heat stress.<br>
<br>
It will lead to a reckoning more quickly than most of us realize.<br>
<br>
The pandemic exposed the fragility of the food supply when meat
processing plants teetered last spring for lack of healthy workers.
Prices shot up 50% at the grocery counter.<br>
<br>
Farmers didn't share in that windfall. Corn prices are at a 10-year
low in a broken industrial system propped up by government design.<br>
<br>
When Takle was a teenager, baling hay in 1960, there were 18-20 days
a year when the temperature would get above 90 degrees. By the end
of the century, Takle warns, this region could be scorched by
temperatures over 100 degrees 50 to 60 days a year.<br>
<br>
Soil that can hold water and defy heat is losing that capacity to
erosion driven by extreme rains. Poor soil, combined with the
extreme heat Takle describes, assures crop failures. Takle said corn
crops could fail every other year if we go on with "business as
usual" pumping out carbon.<br>
<br>
It's already happening in Latin America. Decades of drought are
driving Guatemalan campesino refugees to Storm Lake to work in
meatpacking. Similarly, epic migrations were driven by the Medieval
Drought. It is believed that the Mill Creek people who settled here
were driven north up the Missouri River to the Dakotas as they were
droughted out of Iowa. That drought also led to wars in Europe, not
unlike the contemporary conflicts and migrations in Africa whose
roots are in failing agricultural and food systems.<br>
<br>
The impacts of climate change are real and profound for our most
basic industry: food. Fortunately, sound science tells us that we
can make a real impact on climate change by planting less corn and
more grass that sequesters carbon. Paying farmers to build soil
health and retain water is a better investment than writing a crop
insurance check for drought. Farmers on the frontlines of climate
change are trying to become more resilient to extreme weather by
planting permanent grass strips in crop fields, and planting cover
crops for the winter that suck up nitrogen and CO2. The rate of
adaptation would be quickened if conservation funding programs were
not always under attack.<br>
<br>
The derecho is yet another destructive reminder that heat leading to
extreme storms will destroy our very food sources if we don't face
the climate crisis now.<br>
<br>
Art Cullen is editor of the Storm Lake Times in north-west Iowa,
where he won the Pulitzer prize for editorials on agriculture and
the environment. He is a Guardian US columnist and author of the
book, Storm Lake: Change, Resilience, and Hope in America's
Heartland<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/17/extreme-weather-midwest-climate-crisis">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/17/extreme-weather-midwest-climate-crisis</a>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Prof Katharine Hayhoe]<br>
<b>Climate denial isn't a stand-alone issue; it's part of a toxic
stew that, today, includes covid denial.</b> I review profiles of
those who attack me here on twitter before I block & most
include tweets ridiculing masks or claiming that covid isn't
serious. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://twitter.com/KHayhoe/status/1295445770896904195">https://twitter.com/KHayhoe/status/1295445770896904195</a>
<p>- - <br>
</p>
[follow Fauci's example]<br>
<b>Why COVID deniers and climate skeptics paint scientists as
alarmist</b><br>
By Kate Yoder on Aug 13, 2020<br>
In an interview with Fox News last month, President Donald Trump
called Anthony Fauci, the country's top infectious disease expert,
an "alarmist," using a pejorative straight from the playbook of
those who deny the science behind climate change. Fauci rejected the
characterization, describing himself as a "realist."<br>
<br>
For anyone paying attention to arguments about climate change over
recent decades, Trump's comment sounded awfully familiar: Scientists
are alarmists, everything's a hoax, and hysteria abounds. Michael
Mann, a climatologist at Penn State University, wrote an op-ed for
Newsweek this week drawing parallels between his experience and
Fauci's during COVID-19. Science deniers have lobbied attacks on the
two public figures, he explained, sending death threats, calling
them names, and questioning their expertise.<br>
<br>
So what do terms like alarmist and hysteria really mean, where did
they come from, and how can people respond to such accusations?<br>
The strategies used to dismiss the threats of climate change and
coronavirus follow a similar pattern, and they're employed by many
of the same people. It starts with denying the problem exists, as
Naomi Oreskes, a professor of history at Harvard who studies
disinformation, has explained. Then, people trying to obstruct
action deny the severity of the predicament, say it's too hard or
too expensive to fix, and complain that their freedom is under
threat. Denying the science requires dismissing what scientists are
saying, and the easiest way to do that is by questioning their
motives, impartiality, and rationality.<br>
<br>
"If we don't trust scientists or medical experts because we see them
as alarmist or hysterical or as contributing overreaction, then we
don't trust the info they're giving us," said Emma Frances
Bloomfield, an assistant professor of communication at the
University of Nevada, Las Vegas.<br>
<br>
Back in the day, alarmism was seen as a virtue. The term traces back
to the 1790s, around the time that Edmund Burke, the famous
philosopher, sounded the alarm against the French Revolution. "We
must continue to be vigorous alarmists," he wrote.<br>
<br>
That "sounding the alarm" connotation faded long ago. Now it
suggests a person who exaggerates and sensationalizes potential
dangers, sowing needless panic. It's a pejorative that doesn't fit
most scientists. Research has shown that they're fairly conservative
when it comes to the climate crisis. A 2012 study found that their
projections have actually underestimated the effects of our
overheating planet, like the potential disintegration of the West
Antarctic ice sheet. The authors of that study, including Oreskes,
wrote that "scientists are biased not toward alarmism but rather the
reverse: toward cautious estimates." They called this tendency
"erring on the side of least drama," and suggested that the tendency
to downplay future changes comes from a pressure to appear
objective.<br>
<br>
The commonly held notion of what a scientist should be was
articulated by Robert K. Merton, an American sociologist who
outlined the "ideal" expectations for scientists in the 1940s.
Merton called for scientists to be unbiased, rational, and to stay
clear of conflicts of interest.<br>
<br>
Words like overreacting emphasize emotion, detracting from
scientific credibility. "Being emotional is something that we try to
keep away from science," Bloomfield said. "When you think about
scientists really caring about something, it violates those
expectations we have that scientists are balanced and they only look
at facts."<br>
<br>
Take hysteria, which comes from the Greek word for uterus. (Plato
and Hippocrates thought the womb lurched up and down in the body,
causing erratic behavior, emotional outbursts, and insanity among
womankind.) The term has a dark and complicated history, but suffice
it to say that it made an appearance in 17th-century witch trials,
and much later on, during some pretty frustrating visits to the
doctor.<br>
<br>
"It's feminizing science as a way to discredit it," Bloomfield said.
Another word to keep an eye out for is shrill, an adjective
describing a high-pitched, piercing voice that became a way to
stigmatize women (think Hillary Clinton) and sometimes scientists,
too.<br>
<br>
To counter these attacks, Bloomfield said that one effective
strategy is to follow Fauci's example: Reject the characterization
and substitute your own word, like realist instead of alarmist.<br>
<br>
Another strategy is to ask questions that challenge assumptions.
Bloomfield suggests asking something like, "How many people would
have to die for you to be alarmed?" With 164,000 deaths and
climbing, more Americans have died from COVID-19 than were killed in
World War I. The question forces people to think for themselves and
draw their own conclusions.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://grist.org/politics/dont-like-what-scientists-are-saying-try-insulting-them/">https://grist.org/politics/dont-like-what-scientists-are-saying-try-insulting-them/</a><br>
<p>- - -<br>
</p>
[Moral breakdown]<br>
<b>What Mask-Backlash Teaches Us About Climate Denialism</b><br>
The intellectual and moral breakdown of society is making it
impossible to solve problems<br>
Jesse Harris<br>
- -<br>
COVID-19 has been a difficult problem to solve as a society, but it
is nothing compared to the challenge of climate change. Masks should
have been easy. The science of masks is intuitive, the public
opinion is overwhelming in favor, they are only a minor
inconvenience, they are cheap, and they primarily help those closest
to you. Despite all this, mask-skeptics have instigated a drawn-out
fight that will likely continue for months if not years.<br>
Mask and climate skepticism are built on both a failure of our
shared epistemology and empathy. To think masks are dangerous
requires one to abandon science and reason. Believing that mask
mandates are unethical implies a strictly individualistic moral
framework. These systems of knowledge and morality are essential to
a functional society. Without them, there is no argument or logic to
bridge the gaps within our community. It may seem hyperbolic to
claim that a few kooks yelling about masks causing CO2 poisoning is
indicative of a societal breakdown, but it is a sign of intellectual
rot. If this decay spreads, it will be impossible to solve any large
challenge.<br>
This article isn't about offering solutions, but it is also not
about wallowing in despair. We must acknowledge the scope of the
problems that face us, which includes recognizing the social unity
we must achieve. COVID was a practice test, and we failed. Badly.<br>
Environmentalists need to take the potential for climate backlash
seriously. Current models have us on track for disastrous levels of
warming. How will we create a sustainable economy when ~20% of the
population takes a hard-line opposition? How do you build political
will when the science is confusing? How do you explain that everyone
should care about other people? To have any hope of solving the
climate crisis we must find answers to these questions.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://medium.com/climate-conscious/what-mask-backlash-teaches-us-about-climate-denialism-6fef99b73e35">https://medium.com/climate-conscious/what-mask-backlash-teaches-us-about-climate-denialism-6fef99b73e35</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
[next storm will be named Laura]<br>
<b>Two Areas to Watch in the Atlantic For Tropical Development as
Hurricane Season Heads Toward Peak</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://weather.com/storms/hurricane/news/2020-08-16-atlantic-hurricane-season-what-to-watch-late-august">https://weather.com/storms/hurricane/news/2020-08-16-atlantic-hurricane-season-what-to-watch-late-august</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[hot mess widespread]<br>
<b>California plagued by scorching heat (130 degrees!), lightning,
blackouts and even fire tornadoes</b><br>
Published: Aug. 16, 2020 <br>
By Mike Murphy<br>
Warning of rolling blackouts through Wednesday, as wildfires rage
and much of the state sizzles<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.marketwatch.com/story/california-plagued-by-scorching-heat-130-degrees-lightning-blackouts-and-even-fire-tornadoes-2020-08-16">https://www.marketwatch.com/story/california-plagued-by-scorching-heat-130-degrees-lightning-blackouts-and-even-fire-tornadoes-2020-08-16</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Lots of factors]<br>
<b>Melting ice is a gift to the fossil fuel tankers navigating the
Arctic</b><br>
By Maria Gallucci - Aug 17, 2020<br>
A stocky blue 980-foot-long tanker named Christophe de Margerie
sailed from Russia's far-north Yamal Peninsula to the Bering Strait
near Alaska in May, two months before such ships usually pass
through a major Arctic sea route. The vessel carried and ran on
liquefied natural gas, accompanied by the icebreaker Yamal on the
12-day journey. Record-low ice levels along the route allowed its
Russian owner, Sovcomflot, to ship the fossil fuel to China,
completing the earliest voyage of its kind yet.<br>
<br>
If the milestone signals big opportunity for oil and gas producers,
it also embodies two troubling trends for the rest of the planet.<br>
<br>
More large ships Like the Christophe de Margerie are running on
liquefied natural gas, or LNG. That switch is resulting in higher
emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, according to a new
report by international shipping experts. The vessel's voyage also
comes as Arctic ship traffic is rising, a development made
increasingly possible by above-average temperatures and disappearing
sea ice—particularly along the Christophe de Margerie's Northern Sea
Route. A recent study raised the possibility that Arctic summers
could be completely free of sea ice by 2035.<br>
<br>
"Because the climate is warming, it's opening up more and more,"
Mark Serreze, director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center,
said of the 3,000-mile-long passage.<br>
<br>
Ice in the Laptev and East Siberian Seas began melting earlier than
usual this year, fueled by a Siberian heat wave that also triggered
massive wildfires. The Christophe de Margerie still had to forge
through treacherous ice, but by mid-July, the route appeared to be
ice-free, the earliest that's been known to happen.<br>
<br>
Sea ice conditions are still "highly variable" from year to year and
depend on the seasonal wind and weather patterns, Serreze said. But
the route's early opening "is part of a trend," he added. "Overall,
we're losing ice cover over the Arctic Ocean. We are decidedly
downward."<br>
<br>
No group is better poised to capitalize on the warming Arctic than
Russia's oil and gas giants. Gazprom and Rosneft have recently
expanded offshore Arctic drilling, while Novatek and other partners
built a massive LNG production facility in Sabetta, which switched
on in late 2017. Ships have since moved tens of millions of tons of
the gas to European markets and, taking the Northern Sea Route, to
major ports in Asia.<br>
- - <br>
As countries and global regulators work to curb pollution from
ships, more companies are using LNG not only for specialized Arctic
tankers, but also for passenger cruise liners and behemoth container
ships. When burned, LNG produces little nitrogen oxide and virtually
no sulfur dioxide, two harmful pollutants linked to asthma, heart
failure, and other health problems. It's also estimated to reduce a
ship's onboard carbon dioxide emissions by about 20 percent,
compared to conventional marine fuels.<br>
<br>
At least 750 cargo ships, tankers, tugboats, ferries, and other
vessels today can run on LNG, or double the amount available in
2012.<br>
<br>
Yet burning LNG means they're emitting more of the supercharged
greenhouse gas, methane. The gas traps much more heat in the
atmosphere than carbon dioxide, further accelerating climate change.
Environmental groups have raised concerns that switching to LNG will
ultimately hinder—not help—the shipping industry's broader effort to
reduce emissions.<br>
<br>
As more vessels have switched to using LNG, the industry's methane
emissions rose by 150 percent from 2012 to 2018, according to a
recent study commissioned by the International Maritime
Organization, the U.N. body that regulates shippers. That's even
though vessels burned roughly 28 percent more LNG over the six-year
stretch.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://grist.org/energy/climate-change-is-a-gift-to-the-fossil-fuel-tankers-navigating-the-arctic/">https://grist.org/energy/climate-change-is-a-gift-to-the-fossil-fuel-tankers-navigating-the-arctic/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Digging back into the internet news archive]<br>
<font size="+1"><b>On this day in the history of global warming -
August 18, 2015 </b></font><br>
<p>August 18, 2015: The New York Times reports:<br>
<br>
"The Obama administration is expected to propose as soon as
Tuesday the first-ever federal regulation to cut emissions of
methane, a powerful greenhouse gas that contributes to global
warming, by the nation's oil and natural-gas industry, officials
familiar with the plan said on Monday.<br>
<br>
"The proposed rule would call for the reduction of methane
emissions by 40 to 45 percent over the next decade from 2012
levels, the officials said. The proposal was widely expected,
after the Environmental Protection Agency said in January that it
was working on such a plan.<br>
<br>
"The new rules are part of Mr. Obama's broad push for regulations
meant to cut emissions of planet-warming gases from different
sectors of the economy. This month, Mr. Obama unveiled the
centerpiece of that plan, a regulation meant to cut emissions of
carbon dioxide by 32 percent from 2005 levels by 2030, a move that
could transform the way the nation produces and consumes electric
power.<br>
<br>
"The new rules on methane could create a tougher regulatory scheme
on the nation's fossil fuel production, particularly on the way
that companies extract, move and store natural gas.<br>
<br>
"Environmental advocates have long urged the Obama administration
to crack down on methane emissions. Most of the greenhouse gas
pollution in the United States comes from carbon dioxide, which is
produced by burning coal, oil and natural gas. Methane, which
leaks from oil and gas wells, accounts for just 9 percent of the
nation's greenhouse gas pollution — but it is over 20 times more
potent than carbon dioxide, so even small amounts of it can have a
big impact on global warming."<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/18/business/us-is-set-to-propose-regulation-to-cut-methane-emissions.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/18/business/us-is-set-to-propose-regulation-to-cut-methane-emissions.html</a>
<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/<br>
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html"><https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html></a>
/<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a><br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
*** Privacy and Security:*This is a text-only mailing that carries
no images which may originate from remote servers. Text-only
messages provide greater privacy to the receiver and sender.<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>