<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><i><font size="+1"><b>October 27, 2020</b></font></i> <br>
</p>
[E&E News]<br>
<b>Exclusive: GM, Ford knew about climate change 50 years ago</b><br>
Maxine Joselow, E&E News reporter - Monday, October 26, 2020<br>
Scientists at two of America's biggest automakers knew as early as
the 1960s that car emissions caused climate change, a monthslong
investigation by E&E News has found.<br>
<br>
The discoveries by General Motors and Ford Motor Co. preceded
decades of political lobbying by the two car giants that undermined
global attempts to reduce emissions while stalling U.S. efforts to
make vehicles cleaner.<br>
<br>
Researchers at both automakers found strong evidence in the 1960s
and '70s that human activity was warming the Earth. A primary
culprit was the burning of fossil fuels, which released large
quantities of heat-trapping gases such as carbon dioxide that could
trigger melting of polar ice sheets and other dire consequences.<br>
<br>
A GM scientist presented her findings to at least three high-level
executives at the company, including a former chairman and CEO. It's
unclear whether similar warnings reached the top brass at Ford.<br>
<br>
But in the following decades, both manufacturers largely failed to
act on the knowledge that their products were heating the planet.
Instead of shifting their business models away from fossil fuels,
the companies invested heavily in gas-guzzling trucks and SUVs. At
the same time, the two carmakers privately donated hundreds of
thousands of dollars to groups that cast doubt on the scientific
consensus on global warming.<br>
<br>
It wasn't until 1996 that GM produced its first commercial electric
vehicle, called the EV1. Ford released a compact electric pickup
truck in 1998.<br>
More than 50 years after the automakers learned about climate
change, the transportation sector is the leading source of
planet-warming pollution in the United States. Cars and trucks
account for the bulk of those emissions.<br>
- -<br>
GM, in a brief response, pointed to steps it's taking to reduce
emissions, such as releasing an electric version of its Hummer,
which for years has embodied the popularity of gas-guzzling SUVs.
The company downplayed its past rejection of climate action.<br>
<br>
"There is nothing we can say about events that happened one or two
generations ago since they are irrelevant to the company's positions
and strategy today," a GM spokesman said.<br>
- - <br>
Reck, the GM scientist, left the automaker in 1992 after she was
allegedly told to stop researching environmental issues.<br>
<br>
"I always wondered whether they would try to end the research if it
showed what they were doing was bad," she said. "Toward the end,
they did. But for 27 years they supported it."<br>
<br>
Reck went on to become head of the global climate change program at
Argonne National Laboratory and a professor of atmospheric sciences
at the University of California, Davis. Now 88 years old and
retired, she rarely leaves her home in Indiana due to concern about
the COVID-19 pandemic.<br>
<br>
Over the course of four phone interviews with E&E News, Reck
expressed shock that severe consequences of global warming, such as
the massive wildfires raging in California, have materialized in her
lifetime.<br>
<br>
"We thought that might happen 800 years from now," she said of the
fires. "We had it in the very far future that these things might
start to happen from climate change. So it has gone at such an
accelerated rate."<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.eenews.net/stories/1063717035">https://www.eenews.net/stories/1063717035</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Oxford Climate Society - live video discussion]<br>
<b>US Election and Climate Policy</b><br>
October 26, 2020<br>
<b>Maggie Thomas - Climate Policy Advisor to Sen. Elizabeth Warren
& Policy Director at Evergreen Action</b><br>
Julian Brave NoiseCat - Vice President of Policy and Strategy at
Data for Progress<br>
Kate Guy - Senior Fellow at the Center for Climate and Security<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://youtu.be/cXpxoIHAbL4?t=385">https://youtu.be/cXpxoIHAbL4?t=385</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
[THE CENTER FOR CLIMATE & SECURITY]<br>
<b>The Center for Climate and Security on CBS News: Suppression of
Climate Change Analysis by the White House</b><br>
By Kate Guy<br>
OCTOBER 26, 2020<br>
...<br>
There is still time for the U.S. government to take these threats
seriously, and to prepare for and prevent the worst outcomes. Check
out the Climate Security Plan for America: A Presidential Plan for
Combating the Security Risks of Climate Change for detailed
proposals on how the next Administration can advance these issues...<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://climateandsecurity.org/2020/10/the-center-for-climate-and-security-on-cbs-news-suppression-of-climate-change-analysis-by-the-white-house/">https://climateandsecurity.org/2020/10/the-center-for-climate-and-security-on-cbs-news-suppression-of-climate-change-analysis-by-the-white-house/</a><br>
<p>- - <br>
</p>
[source document]<br>
<b>The Climate and Security Advisory Group (CSAG): A Climate
Security Plan for America</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://climateandsecurity.org/climatesecurityplanforamerica/">https://climateandsecurity.org/climatesecurityplanforamerica/</a><br>
<b>1. Demonstrate Leadership:</b> Make Climate Change a Vital
National Security Priority.<br>
<b>2. Assess Climate Risks:</b> Maintain Unprecedented Foresight
About Climate Change.<br>
<b>3. Support Allies and Partners:</b> Reinforce U.S. National
Security and Compete on the World Stage by Bolstering Climate
Resilience Abroad.<br>
<b>4. Prepare for and Prevent Climate Impacts:</b> Build U.S.
Resilience to Climate Change Risks and Reduce Their Scale and Scope.<br>
pdf document -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://climateandsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/a-climate-security-plan-for-america_2019_9_24-1.pdf">https://climateandsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/a-climate-security-plan-for-america_2019_9_24-1.pdf</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[ecopiety?]<br>
<b>Want Some Eco-Friendly Tips? A New Study Says No, You Don't</b><br>
By Kate Yoder on Oct 12, 2020<br>
Nagging, giving unsolicited advice, and "ecopiety" are out. But
there are better ways to get people to adopt green habits.<br>
- -<br>
In the study -- titled "Don't Tell Me What to Do" -- researchers at
Georgia State University surveyed nearly 2,000 people online to see
how they would respond to different messages about climate change.
Some saw messages about personal sacrifices, like using less hot
water. Others saw statements about policy actions, like laws that
would limit carbon emissions, stop deforestation, or increase fuel
efficiency standards for cars. The messenger -- whether scientist or
not -- didn't make much of a difference.<br>
<br>
Then the respondents were asked about their thoughts on climate
change. The people who read advice about individual action were less
likely to report that they believed in human-caused climate change,
supported climate-friendly political candidates, or would act to
reduce their own emissions.<br>
<br>
While the advice about personal behavior spurred a negative response
from people across the political spectrum, the effect was much
stronger among Republicans than Democrats, said Risa Palm, a
professor of urban geography at Georgia State and the lead author of
the study.<br>
<br>
On the other hand, "when the message was linked with policy issues,
it didn't have this kind of negative effect," she said. Palm's study
reinforces previous research that people prefer wide-scale changes
that don't require them to change their own behavior. They simply
don't feel like anything they could do would make much of a
difference.<br>
<br>
It's a valid point of view, according to Sarah McFarland Taylor, the
author of Ecopiety: Green Media and the Dilemma of Environmental
Virtue. The scope of the proposed eco-friendly solutions -- like,
say, getting individuals to use less hot water -- is simply "absurd"
compared to the scope of the actual problem, she said.<br>
<br>
Taylor, an associate professor of religious studies at Northwestern,
uses the term ecopiety to refer to the voluntary duties that signal
a person's "green" virtue -- driving a Toyota Prius, filling up a
Nalgene, or ordering a salad instead of a burger. "We are fiddling
with all these fiddly little 'ecopiety' details while the world is
burning," she said.<br>
<br>
"The fact of the matter is, a small cadre of the 'ecopious' who have
the wherewithal and the resources to do these voluntary individual
actions, will do them," Taylor said. "And the rest of the people
will not."...<br>
- -<br>
Why are people so resistant to climate-friendly behavior? It comes
down to psychology. When people don't like the solutions that are
presented to them, or when they feel like their freedom is under
threat, they may deny that there's a problem altogether, Palm said.<br>
<br>
When the Toyota Prius went worldwide in 2000, it was marketed as a
climate-friendly, virtuous purchase, because it ran on gas and
electricity. "There was an unintended rebound effect, with certain
sectors of the population reacting very hostilely," Taylor said.
Years later, diesel truck owners started "coal-rolling": removing
emissions controls and rigging up their vehicles to spew giant
clouds of smoke, targeted at unsuspecting pedestrians, bicyclists,
and Prius owners.<br>
<br>
Something similar might be happening with environmental-friendly
advice. In a new Facebook ad from the American Conservation
Coalition, a free-market, pro-business environmental group, a blond
college student offers a barrage of tips to help you "address
climate change on an individual level." The list includes asking
your local utility to switch you over to renewable sources,
returning your empty lipstick container in exchange for a new one,
and buying lots of "sustainable" products -- durable water bottles,
reusable sandwich bags, backpacks made from recycled materials, and
more.<br>
<br>
Let's put aside the assumption that you could somehow shop your way
out of the climate crisis and turn to the comment section. The top
voted comment asks, "Any chance we could prove the 'science' first?"
Another says, "I don't reduce, reuse or recycle anything."<br>
<br>
"Once you tell people to sacrifice, deny, be noble, be pure, be
vegan, it often triggers the opposite reaction in terms of consumer
behavior," Taylor said.<br>
<br>
Based on the findings of behavioral science, changing habits might
involve more "showing" and less "telling." Greta Thunberg
popularized the idea of flight shame not by actually shaming people,
but by example. Instead of taking a carbon-spewing airplane to the
U.N. Climate Action Summit last summer, the Swedish activist crossed
the entire Atlantic Ocean via boat...<br>
- - <br>
As an example, Taylor points to how Copenhagen became a "bicycle
paradise." After the oil crisis in 1973, the Danish city rethought
its transportation system and built the infrastructure to make
biking safe and convenient. Riding a bike was marketed as something
practical, exciting, and even glamorous. Mikael Colville-Andersen,
an international biking advocate who helped popularize cycling in
Copenhagen, once said that bicycling should be sold as "a
multivitamin Viagra pill for the urban landscape." Copenhagen now
has more bikes than people -- and five times as many bikes as cars.<br>
<br>
The pro-biking campaign, in other words, wasn't bathed in ecopiety
and guilt. When a survey in 2010 asked people in Copenhagen why they
cycled, environmental concerns ranked dead last at 9 percent. Most
people said that it was simply faster, more convenient, healthier,
and cheaper to bike.<br>
<br>
"You're not trying to get people to bike to work by saying, 'This is
your duty and your sacrifice, denying the pleasures of the
automobile by getting on your bike,'" Taylor said.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://grist.org/climate/want-some-eco-friendly-tips-a-new-study-says-no-you-dont/">https://grist.org/climate/want-some-eco-friendly-tips-a-new-study-says-no-you-dont/</a>
<p>- - -</p>
[source material]<br>
RESEARCH ARTICLE| 14 OCTOBER 2020<br>
<b>"Don't Tell Me What to Do": Resistance to Climate Change Messages
Suggesting Behavior Changes </b><br>
Risa Palm; Toby Bolsen; Justin T. Kingsland<br>
(2020) 12 (4): 827–835.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0141.1">https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0141.1</a><br>
<b>Abstract</b><br>
This study evaluates the impact of exposure to messages that
emphasize the need for changes in individual behavior or in public
policy to address climate change attributed to a "climate scientist"
or to an unnamed source. We implemented a large survey experiment (N
= 1915) online through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform
that manipulated the presence of recommendations for voluntary
behavioral changes or the adoption of new laws to mitigate climate
change. We found that, regardless of the source of the information,
recommendations for behavioral changes decreased individuals'
willingness to take personal actions to reduce greenhouse gases,
decreased willingness to support proclimate candidates, reduced
belief in the accelerated speed of climate change, and decreased
trust in climate scientists.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://journals.ametsoc.org/wcas/article-abstract/doi/10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0141.1/354718/Don-t-Tell-Me-What-to-Do-Resistance-to-Climate">https://journals.ametsoc.org/wcas/article-abstract/doi/10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0141.1/354718/Don-t-Tell-Me-What-to-Do-Resistance-to-Climate</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[risk increase]<br>
<b>War on NOAA? A Climate Denier's Arrival Raises Fears the Agency's
Climate Mission Is Under Attack</b><br>
David Legates has spent his career disputing climate science. Now
he's a top manager in the federal agency most involved in assessing
global warming's threat...<br>
By Marianne Lavelle<br>
OCT 25, 2020<br>
- -<br>
By placing Legates in a deputy position, the administration has made
him legally eligible under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act to be
moved to NOAA's top slot as "acting" administrator. One advantage of
"acting" appointments is they are a way to avoid a contentious
Senate confirmation process. Trump has said he prefers "acting"
appointments, because it gives him more flexibility, but his
administration has been slapped down by the courts for circumventing
the vacancies law. <br>
<br>
The personnel moves won praise from the community of conservative
climate action opponents, who have mostly supported the president,
but who expressed concern that he has not moved more aggressively to
dismantle the remnants of climate science policy. "Legates'
appointment to NOAA represents a big win for climate realism," wrote
H. Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow with the Heartland Institute,
on the group's website.<br>
<br>
But if Trump loses the election, added Ebell, of the Competitive
Enterprise Institute, "I expect David would disappear pretty rapidly
in a Biden administration."<br>
<br>
That isn't necessarily the case. Political appointees sometimes go
on to seek appointments to career government positions, an
end-of-administration ritual known in Washington as "burrowing in."
Although there is anxiety in NOAA about Trump appointees finding a
way to stay on in a Biden administration, there's no indication that
is Legates' intention. Indeed, an email that his University of
Delaware department chair sent to students said, "David hopes to be
back at UD in the spring."<br>
<br>
Even if Legates and the other new hires have a short stay at NOAA,
they still could have influence over the National Climate
Assessment. <br>
<br>
Nominations of scientists from both inside and outside the federal
government will be accepted through Nov. 15. Hundreds of authors
typically participate, and at least one climate contrarian--William
Happer, a Princeton University emeritus professor of physics and
former Trump White House official--has expressed interest in
participating as an author. Steven Koonin, a former chief scientist
for BP who briefly held a position in the Obama administration and
is now a physics professor at New York University, told E&E News
that he has pitched to the Trump White House the idea of
incorporating an adversarial review by skeptics of climate science
into the National Climate Assessment.<br>
<br>
That would make for a quite different report from the National
Climate Assessment that came out on Black Friday in 2018. Philip
Duffy, a physicist and former White House policy adviser who helped
coordinate the National Climate Assessment in the Obama
administration, said he believed that the last report was an
important affirmation of the science at a critical time, likening it
to the statements about the coronavirus by Dr. Anthony Fauci, head
of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.<br>
<br>
"It was a strong statement which contradicted the party line, shall
we say," said Duffy, president and executive director of the
Woodwell Climate Research Center in Woods Hole, Mass. He added that
the assessment's greatest value was the detail it provided on the
specific impacts of warming on different regions of the country,
from heavy precipitation in the South to heat and drought in the
West. "It's intended to form the basis of decision-making and
planning. That's what's unique about it, and essential."<br>
<br>
But skeptics of climate science and opponents of U.S. action to curb
fossil fuel emissions were sharply critical of that report, and the
Trump administration for not exerting more control over it. Ebell,
who disputes the validity of both the models and the data that have
informed the climate assessment, said he believes that if Legates
has an opportunity to help shape the next assessment, it could
provide a much different perspective than the reports of the past.<br>
<br>
"If David Legates and his colleagues are able to be involved in the
preparation of the National Climate Assessment right up to the date
of publication, they're not going to feature the least likely
scenario in order to scare the public," Ebell said. "They're going
to feature the most realistic scenario, and that will be a huge
improvement."<br>
<br>
What that most realistic scenario is, however, is another matter:
The consensus of mainstream scientists is that it depends on how
much the world's nations do to cut carbon emissions.<br>
<br>
The 2018 National Climate Assessment focused both on a high-end
global warming scenario, assuming little effort by nations to curb
greenhouse gases, and a low-end scenario, consistent with nations
implementing significant mitigation measures. At least one recent
study concluded that the high-end scenario is the most realistic.<br>
<br>
Wuebbles, who has been a coordinating lead author on past National
Climate Assessments, said the next volume will come at a critical
time.<br>
<br>
"We need to make sure we understand well what climate change means,
and what kind of options do we have, both in terms of trying to
reduce the future climate change, but also in terms of 'how do we
adapt to be resilient,'" he said. "This is an important document for
the government. We've got to make sure it's done right."<br>
<br>
Wuebbles said he could not speculate on the impact the new
leadership at NOAA could have on the report. "I think we're all
concerned," he said. "We don't know for sure."<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/23102020/noaa-climate-denial-david-legates">https://insideclimatenews.org/news/23102020/noaa-climate-denial-david-legates</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
[video AGU summary of science by satellite]<br>
<b>Sagan Series: Detecting land cover change: Reflections of human
influence on the land surface</b><br>
Oct 26, 2020<br>
AGU<br>
The AGU Sagan Lecture series sponsored jointly by the Biogeosciences
and Planetary Sciences Sections of AGU and is aimed to provide
perspectives on astrobiology and public engagement on critical
issues which transcends boundaries of disciplinary research and
planetary boundaries. These lectures encompass topics integrate and
synthesize multiple disciplines in a unique fashion to explore and
to expand our knowledge of life without boundaries. This seminar
will cover land fragmentation, land cover change, biodiversity
changes as observed and studied with remote sensing techniques
provides a greater global evaluation of these localized phenomena.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gViwdKvQts">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gViwdKvQts</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Bob Murray coal baron - mean epitaph to a controversial life]<br>
<b>Ohio Valley coal giant Bob Murray died inside his St. Clairsville
home Sunday morning. He was 80.</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://twitter.com/WTOV9/status/1320527075502153729">https://twitter.com/WTOV9/status/1320527075502153729</a><br>
- -<br>
[WAPO Obit]<br>
<b>Robert Murray, Ohio coal baron who fought government regulations,
dies at 80</b><br>
.. <br>
Mr. Murray was criticized for his company's safety record and
accused of pressuring his employees to attend political rallies or
donate money to his preferred candidates. But he remained unabashed
about his coal boosterism, characterizing himself as a coal miner,
through and through, who was interested in maintaining jobs that
supported communities from Utah to West Virginia.<br>
<br>
"This is a human issue for me," he told the Times in 2016, lamenting
that most of the 431 miners at his Powhatan No. 6 mine would
probably be laid off when it closed down later that year. "It kills
me. Lives are being destroyed deliberately by some and by the
ignorance of most."<br>
- - <br>
Mr. Murray grew the company in part by acquiring mines located near
power plants with access to rivers, reducing transportation costs.
He was also credited with helping to develop longwall mining
techniques that enable miners to extract coal more efficiently.<br>
<br>
At the same time, he acquired a reputation for litigiousness, suing
several newspapers as well as "Last Week Tonight" host John Oliver
for coverage of him and his company. (Oliver claimed victory after
Murray Energy dropped its defamation lawsuit in 2019, two years
after the HBO host ran a scathing segment on Mr. Murray and his
business practices.)<br>
<br>
Mr. Murray became increasingly prominent in the wake of a 2007
collapse at the Crandall Canyon mine in Utah, which trapped and
killed six of his miners. Three others were killed when a rescue
tunnel collapsed 10 days later.<br>
<br>
While appearing in television interviews during the rescue effort,
Mr. Murray shouted down reporters and insisted that the disaster was
caused by an earthquake. That explanation was later contradicted by
federal investigators who concluded "unauthorized mining practices"
and design flaws had contributed to the disaster, and found no
evidence of an earthquake...<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/robert-murray-ohio-coal-baron-who-fought-government-regulations-dies-at-80/2020/10/26/de9663e8-1794-11eb-befb-8864259bd2d8_story.html">https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/robert-murray-ohio-coal-baron-who-fought-government-regulations-dies-at-80/2020/10/26/de9663e8-1794-11eb-befb-8864259bd2d8_story.html</a><br>
- -<br>
<b>Crandall Canyon Mine</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crandall_Canyon_Mine">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crandall_Canyon_Mine</a><br>
- -<br>
[musical expressions are not slander, so much criticism will be
musically re-packaged as a show tune]: <br>
<b>Last Week Tonight: Eat Shit, Bob: The Musical</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5W06xR8EYk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5W06xR8EYk</a><br>
- -<br>
<b>John Oliver Bob Murray Musical</b> [and lyrics in comments]<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqt5iE1vhFw&feature=youtu.be">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqt5iE1vhFw&feature=youtu.be</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
[Digging back into the internet news archive]<br>
<font size="+1"><b>On this day in the history of global warming -
October 27, 2006 </b></font><br>
<p>Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) urge
ExxonMobil to stop funding climate-change-denying think tanks.<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://web.archive.org/web/20130303200905/http://www.rockefeller.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=87f3ae3b-0f0d-44ee-af03-9080592901a4">http://web.archive.org/web/20130303200905/http://www.rockefeller.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=87f3ae3b-0f0d-44ee-af03-9080592901a4</a><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/<br>
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html"><https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html></a>
/<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a><br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
*** Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender.<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>