<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><i><font size="+1"><b>March 4, 2021</b></font></i></p>
[following the money]<br>
<b>Exxon vs activists: can disenchanted investors force change?</b><br>
CEO Darren Woods faces a campaign for board reform and a shift in
strategy<br>
- -<br>
“It’s not surprising that you’re seeing an activist investor,” he
added. “What makes it surprising is the size of the company — it’s
Exxon.”<br>
<br>
The message is similar from several other big investors. Resentment
at Exxon’s perceived offhand treatment of shareholders and hostility
to change, coupled with the impression that it is not taking climate
change risks as seriously as investors do, is breeding discontent.<br>
<br>
“They haven’t played the environmental game very well, and ticked
off that crowd,” said an executive at an asset manager with a large
position in the company. “And their returns are terrible. They’ve
kind of spun cash away and pissed off the pure-play financial
investors.”<br>
- -<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.ft.com/content/3f73a55b-ac59-4737-b7c8-2f575d32920b">https://www.ft.com/content/3f73a55b-ac59-4737-b7c8-2f575d32920b</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
[brief interview with a professor of public policy ]<br>
<b>Daniel Cohan PhD: The "Systemic Collapse" of Gas in Texas'
Blackout</b><br>
Mar 3, 2021<br>
greenmanbucket<br>
What made natural gas "uniquely vulnerable" to collapse during the
Texas Freeze and Blackout of February 2021?<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaJlGW2jwHs">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaJlGW2jwHs</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Weather from global warming]<br>
<b>A Small Hint of Big Trouble in the Oceans</b><br>
Some scientists fear that meltwater from Greenland may be affecting
ocean currents that help regulate far-reaching weather patterns.<br>
March 3, 2021<br>
By Moises Velasquez-Manoff and Jeremy White<br>
A northern branch of the Gulf Stream — the vast ocean current that
runs from West Africa to the Americas, up the East Coast and back
across the Atlantic to the British Isles — has served for ages as a
kind of planetary heat pump that helps regulate the planet’s
climate.<br>
<br>
Now, some scientists think melting ice from Greenland could be
inhibiting this crucial northern branch of the current. If that’s
the case, they fear, the meltwater could tip the delicate balance of
hot and cold that defines not only conditions around the North
Atlantic, but life far and wide.<br>
<br>
To learn more, researchers have slung necklace-like sensor arrays
across the ocean, not only on the surface, but hundreds of feet
deep.<br>
<br>
Why it matters: Consequences could include faster sea level rise
along parts of the Eastern United States and Europe, stronger
hurricanes barreling into the Southeastern United States, and
perhaps most ominously, reduced rainfall across the Sahel, the
semi-arid swath of land running the width of Africa that is already
a geopolitical tinderbox...<br>
<b>Quotable: </b>“We’re all wishing it’s not true,” Peter de
Menocal, president and director of the Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution, said of the shifting ocean currents. “Because if that
happens, it’s just a monstrous change.”...<br>
- -<br>
<b>The big picture:</b> Other cities and counties face similar
climate challenges, and they’ll watch to see whether Miami can adapt
without crimping its coastal real-estate market.<br>
<br>
<b>Quotable: </b>“What adaptation actually means — and that’s the
scary part, I think, for many elected officials and administrators —
is adaptation may mean ceding land,” said Mike Hernández, a
Democratic consultant who worked for the previous county mayor.
“It’s unfortunately not going to be pretty.”<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/03/climate/a-small-hint-of-big-trouble-in-the-oceans.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/03/climate/a-small-hint-of-big-trouble-in-the-oceans.html</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[highway washouts]<br>
<b>California's Pacific Coast Highway is falling into the ocean. Is
this the end of the road for one of America's most scenic drives?</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/03/03/pch-climate-change-california-big-sur-highway-1/4560256001/">https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/03/03/pch-climate-change-california-big-sur-highway-1/4560256001/</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
[Opinion]<br>
<b>Some of Our Highways Are Missing</b><br>
By Tom Lewis | March 2, 2021 <br>
The term “coastal highway” is fast becoming an oxymoron in the age
of global climate change — which, while we were distracted by Donald
Trump denying that it was coming, has arrived. The triple threat of
rising sea levels, intensified storms and, on the west coast at
least, raging wildfires has made it increasingly difficult and
expensive to keep seaside roads open.<br>
<br>
California’s spectacular Highway 1, for example, whose 650 miles of
breathtaking views are on bucket lists around the world and draw
millions of tourists every year, is seldom completely open from one
end to the other. The latest worst case scenario was a landslide of
mud scoured from 125,000 acres of land burned over by a wildfire, by
a record 16-inch rainfall, which wiped out 150 feet of the highway
165 miles south of San Francisco, closing a 23-mile stretch for
months.<br>
<br>
Three years ago, a similar slide 140 miles south of San Francisco
buried a quarter mile of the highway and relocated 15 acres of land.
That repair took a year and cost $54 million. In a little over 5
years, keeping the road open has cost California $200 million in
emergency funds.<br>
<br>
Highway engineers are increasingly desperate. Debris from wrecked
seawalls thrown up to buy some time litter the shore for miles along
the highway. Plans are afoot to relocate 40 miles of the road much
farther inland. Which of course will leave 610 miles of road still
exposed.<br>
<br>
On the other coast, similar desperation is rising around Florida’s
Highway One, especially south of Miami as it reaches for the Keys.
The highway and its associated networks of streets that serve the
small Keys communities are at sea level, and are increasingly
plagued by what Floridians now call “sunny-day flooding” — floods
that are not caused by rain or storm, but simply by the rising sea.
Every spring and fall, so-called king tides, augmented by the
proximity of the moon and sun to the earth, bring the worst of sunny
day flooding. <br>
<br>
During the fall king tides of 2019, parts of the highway system
serving the Keys stayed underwater for 90 days. In the fall of
2020, large sections of Key Largo had to deal with submerged streets
and highways for 82 straight days. They Keyshave asked the state for
an emergency appropriation of $150 million to deal with sea level
rise. (Until recently, the Florida state government forbade the use
of the terms “global warming,” or “sea level rise” in state
applications, legislation or official documents of any kind. The ban
had no effect on the problem, however, and has since been
abandoned.) <br>
<br>
If approved, it will take almost all the emergency funds to do one
project — to raise the level of a three mile stretch of highway on
Sugarloaf Key, where 30 people live. So that’s taken care of then,
mission accomplished. It’s only 166 miles from Miami to Key West.<br>
<br>
Slowly, reluctantly, and with great strife, the communities of the
Keys, along with many towns and cities along the coastal highway in
California, Oregon and Washington, are beginning to face the fact
that they cannot win this fight. You can ignore it, you can prohibit
discussion of it, but there is no way to ignore the fact that the
water has reached your knees and is still rising. (King Canute,
please go to the nearest courtesy phone, you have an urgent call.) <br>
<br>
In 2019, the Keys began a program of buying and demolishing homes
substantially damaged by Hurricane Irma, focusing on the ones most
in danger from rising sea levels. Similar struggles began at the
same time in places such as Packifica, Imperial Beach and about40
other communities in California and along the west coast; Norfolk,
Virginia and South Miami Beach, Florida. (See “Don’t Say Anything,
But We’re Losing This War,” the Daily Impact July 16, 2019)<br>
<br>
In every one of the places where this is happening the situation is
highly fraught, the contention between those trying to face reality
and those who prefer to scream, “You have no right to take my
house,” at fever pitch to start, with nowhere to go but worse. We
are about to learn what happens when the unstoppable — climate
change — meets the immovable — the profoundly ignorant and supremely
arrogant know-nothings who make up a distressing proportion of
America’s ruling class. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.dailyimpact.net/2021/03/02/some-of-our-highways-are-missing/">http://www.dailyimpact.net/2021/03/02/some-of-our-highways-are-missing/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[because analysts should never be surprised by the future]<br>
<b>Why The Intelligence Community Needs a Climate Change Task Force</b><br>
Kristin Wood, Sr. Climate Editor, The Cipher Brief<br>
Erin Sikorsky, Deputy Director, Center for Climate and Security<br>
EXPERT PERSPECTIVE — President Biden’s 27 January Executive Order
(EO) on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad demonstrates
a strong commitment to preparing the United States for addressing
the climate crisis. It assigns experienced climate experts into
powerful new roles and issues extensive orders for a
whole-of-government response. This article analyzes the Intelligence
Community aspects of the EO.<br>
<br>
For national security agencies, the EO orders agencies to assess
within 90 days:<br>
<blockquote>— Climate impacts relevant to broad agency strategies
in particular countries or regions;<br>
<br>
— Climate impacts on their agency-managed infrastructure abroad
(e.g., embassies, military installations), without prejudice to
existing requirements regarding assessment of such infrastructure;<br>
<br>
— How the agency intends to manage such impacts or incorporate
risk mitigation into its installation master plans; and<br>
<br>
— How the agency’s international work, including partner
engagement, can contribute to addressing the climate crisis.<br>
</blockquote>
Fully maximizing the effectiveness of the 18 IC agencies’ individual
responses to the EO will require a coordinated strategy. While the
EO calls for a National Intelligence Estimate on climate change,
representing coordinated analysis among all agencies is only one
piece of the puzzle.<br>
<br>
Building a true climate security intelligence strategy will require
an evaluation of how the IC’s core missions of collection and
analysis can contribute to addressing climate threats. This will
require an assessment of the IC’s people, programs and policies as
well as what is missing, what needs to be adjusted, and what new
skills, capabilities and resources are required.<br>
<br>
The overriding question for collection and analysis is: what
decision advantage can the IC offer the President when it comes to
climate issues? What unique climate change-related information can
the intelligence community collect and analyze that would serve US
national security? Are there new forms of collection and analysis,
especially scientific analysis needed? How could the CIA’s unique
capabilities, for example, be brought to bear? A rigorous process
aimed at answering these questions should examine what new
requirements need to be levied, what new sources HUMINT, SIGINT, and
other collectors need to find, and what partnerships need to be
deepened or created.<br>
<br>
To conduct this evaluation, we suggest creating an ODNI National
Security and Climate Change Task Force that looks at each agency’s
contributions to the EO and stitches them into a whole-of-IC
approach to climate across all missions. A blue-ribbon panel of
climate and security experts from both outside and inside government
would offer a fresh perspective on how the IC could best contribute
to tackling this mission. In addition to offering expertise that
mostly resides outside the IC, external participants would be a
check on agencies’ tendencies, which we’ve experienced multiple
times over the decades, to relabel existing entities with a new name
as an answer to executive requirements.<br>
<br>
Such a task force is likely to identify necessary adjustments to IC
spending, personnel, and infrastructure. Additional leadership
positions or new structures within agencies may be needed to
implement task force recommendations in the longer term. For
example, better integration of climate modeling and data,
open-source collection, and classified information may require new
tools and new teams to fully implement. On top of adjustments to
collection and analysis, the IC also must consider direct climate
change risks to its facilities and infrastructure. Therefore, the
task force should include an IC Climate Resilience and Adaptation
Subcommittee with finance, facilities and security expertise.<br>
<br>
We offer below some issues such a task force could consider, drawn
from engagements with hundreds of experts on climate security issues
over the past few years:<br>
<br>
IC strategic foresight and early warning capabilities and talent
have been diminished over time by other priorities. They are very
much needed to support threat anticipation and preparedness on a
range of intersecting risks linked to climate change, from water and
food insecurity, regional conflicts, infectious diseases, and
natural disasters. Global trends work — often relegated to the
physical and metaphorical basement — needs to be front and center.
The Biden Administration has already signaled its prioritization of
a more integrated approach to monitoring global threats by its call
for the creation of a National Center for Epidemic Forecasting and
Outbreak Analytics to modernize global early warning and trigger
systems to prevent, detect, and respond to biological threats. The
types of contributions the IC would make to such a center could and
should be replicated in the climate security realm.<br>
Climate security risks also create opportunities to use the CIA’s
unique overseas partnerships in new ways. CIA stations and bases
would be ideal leadership nodes for partnering on climate change,
allowing the Agency to tap into existing liaison relationships to
generate projections that no one else could. The CIA could play a
critical role in helping US policymakers understand other countries’
plans and intentions to respond to climate security threats.
Additionally, climate change could be an area of partnership with
countries such as Russia and China.<br>
While conducting climate science within the US government will
remain the purview of scientific agencies such as NOAA, NASA, and
others, IC agencies need more personnel with scientific literacy and
backgrounds. At a minimum, agencies will need more climate
scientists on their teams and closer partnerships with them so that
deep scientific understanding is included in collection requirements
and analytic writing.<br>
Finally, we note the National Climate Task Force created by the EO
does not include the DNI as a member. While that seems a logical
choice as the task force is focused domestically, the reality is
that the division between foreign and domestic operations just
doesn’t work for climate. For example, the IC can answer foreign
policy and homeland security questions on topics such as prospects
for climate-expanded migration to US borders, actual versus publicly
provided achievement of other countries’ climate objectives, among
many other things. The IC can also leverage its unique capabilities
to understand how other actors are responding to climate change
effects–i.e., not just what will they do in emissions negotiations,
but explain how issues such as water scarcity concerns drive Chinese
foreign policy in the region.<br>
<br>
As President Biden said when signing the climate executive order
last month, his action made “it official that climate change will be
the center of our national security and foreign policy.” The
security threats posed by climate change grow with each passing day
and addressing them requires innovation and new conceptions of
national security. As it has so many times before, on many different
threats, the IC can and should step up to play a leading,
transformative role on climate security risks, integrating across
missions to deliver the most insightful analysis possible in support
of the President’s directive and in service to the American people.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://climateandsecurity.org/2021/03/why-the-intelligence-community-needs-a-climate-change-task-force/">https://climateandsecurity.org/2021/03/why-the-intelligence-community-needs-a-climate-change-task-force/</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.thecipherbrief.com/article/climate/why-the-intelligence-community-needs-a-climate-change-task-force">https://www.thecipherbrief.com/article/climate/why-the-intelligence-community-needs-a-climate-change-task-force</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>[professional government]<br>
<b>Reversing Trump, Interior Department Moves Swiftly on Climate
Change</b><br>
By Lisa Friedman - Updated March 3, 2021,<br>
WASHINGTON — As the Interior Department awaits its new secretary,
the agency is already moving to lock in key parts of President
Biden’s environmental agenda, particularly on oil and gas
restrictions, laying the groundwork to fulfill some of the
administration’s most consequential climate change promises.<br>
</p>
<p>Representative Deb Haaland of New Mexico, Mr. Biden’s nominee to
lead the department, faces a showdown vote in the Senate likely
later this month, amid vocal Republican concern for her past
positions against oil and gas drilling. But even without her, an
agency that spent much of the past four years opening vast swaths
of land to commercial exploitation has pulled an abrupt
about-face.<br>
<br>
The department has suspended lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico
under an early executive order imposing a temporary freeze on new
drilling leases on all public lands and waters and requiring a
review of the leasing program. It has frozen drilling activity in
the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, delayed Trump-era rollbacks
on protections of migratory birds and the northern spotted owl,
and taken the first steps in restoring two national monuments in
Utah and one off the Atlantic coast that Mr. Trump largely
dismantled.<br>
<br>
As early as this week, one administration official said the
Interior Department is poised to take the next steps in preparing
a review of the federal oil and gas leasing program...</p>
<p>Even critics of the administration’s agenda said they have been
surprised by the pace of the agency’s actions.<br>
<br>
“They’re obviously moving forward quickly and aggressively,” said
Nicolas Loris, an economist who focuses on environment policy at
the conservative Heritage Foundation.<br>
<br>
That aggressiveness, along with Ms. Haaland’s long history of
pushing to shut down fossil fuel drilling and pipelines, has put
the agency in the line of fire from Republicans and the oil and
gas industry...</p>
<p>“I almost feel like your nomination is sort of this proxy fight
over the future of fossil fuels,” Senator Maria Cantwell, Democrat
of Washington, told Ms. Haaland during her confirmation hearing
last week...<br>
</p>
<p>The Environmental Protection Agency will ultimately take center
stage in the regulatory battles over climate change because it is
the lead agency policing emissions from the electricity and
transportation sectors — the two largest sources of greenhouse gas
emissions in the United States.<br>
<br>
But the Interior Department, which decides when and whether to
sell publicly owned coal, oil and gas, is at the heart of the
always contentious fight over keeping such resources “in the
ground” — that is, whether the vast majority of America’s fossil
fuels should remain untapped to avoid dangerous concentrations of
greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.<br>
<br>
Mr. Biden already has appointed nearly 50 top Interior officials
across the vast agency, many of them veterans of the Obama
administration, adept at pulling the levers of policy. They
include Kate Kelly, who spent six years at the Interior Department
before going to the liberal Center for American Progress where she
focused on public lands policy, and Laura Daniel Davis who served
as chief of staff to former secretaries Sally Jewell and Ken
Salazar. This time around, she is a principal deputy assistant
secretary over land and minerals management.<br>
<br>
Perhaps the most significant driver of the agency’s most
aggressive early action, supporters of the administration said,
has been David Hayes, who served in both the Obama and Clinton
administrations as deputy secretary of Interior. Mr. Hayes worked
on Mr. Biden’s transition and ahead of Inauguration Day was tapped
to be a special adviser to the president on climate change policy.<br>
<br>
“These are people who know how to get things done,” said Sarah
Greenberger, interim chief conservation officer at the National
Audubon Society.<br>
<br>
The appointments have had immediate effects. The day after Mr.
Biden named a new offshore energy regulator at the Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management, for example, the office revived the review of
an offshore wind farm near Martha’s Vineyard that the Trump
administration had moved to cancel...</p>
<p>Ms. Greenberger noted that actions like suspending the Trump-era
rule that gutted protections for migratory birds required
particularly fast planning since the Biden administration had only
a short window to act before the rule was set to take effect, on
Feb. 8. Similarly when an Alaska Native group missed a deadline to
conduct a seismic survey in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge,
the department moved to effectively kill the survey.<br>
<br>
“There was an enormous amount of thought put in during the
transition, especially into understanding what needed to happen
and what were the opportunities,” Ms. Greenberg said.<br>
<br>
Critics took a dimmer view.<br>
<br>
“Makes you wonder if they’re treating the new secretary as a
figurehead and the deputies are going forward with what they had
planned regardless,” said Kathleen Sgamma, president of the
Western Energy Alliance, a Denver-based oil and natural gas
association.<br>
<br>
In a statement Jennifer Van der Heide, chief of staff at the
Department of Interior, said those already in place at the agency
are working to implement Mr. Biden’s campaign promises until Ms.
Haaland is confirmed.<br>
<br>
“There are some actions we can or must move quickly on, but when
we have a secretary, she will provide the leadership, experience
and vision to restore morale within the department, build a clean
energy economy, strengthen the nation-to-nation relationships with
tribes, and inspire a movement to better conserve our nation’s
lands, waters, and wildlife,” Ms. Van der Heide said.<br>
<br>
The Interior Department manages about 500 million acres of public
lands and vast coastal waters. Its agencies lease many of those
acres for oil and gas drilling as well as wind and solar farms. It
oversees the country’s national parks and wildlife refuges,
protects threatened and endangered species, reclaims abandoned
mine sites, oversees the government’s relationship with the
nation’s 574 federally recognized tribes, and provides scientific
data about the effects of climate change...<br>
</p>
<p>That sprawling range of authorities has allowed Interior to move
more quickly than smaller agencies that rely more on the slow
churn of regulations, experts noted. Interior has initiated
consultations with tribal leaders to hear their suggestions on
federal policies and reversed restrictions that Mr. Trump’s
Interior secretary, David Bernhardt, had imposed on the Land and
Water Conservation Fund, which prevented money from being used to
buy public land.<br>
<br>
But some major actions — such as an expected revision of the
Endangered Species Act, which Mr. Trump’s administration curtailed
through regulation — must await a Senate-confirmed secretary.<br>
<br>
Mr. Biden’s Interior Department will ultimately be defined by its
reversals on fossil fuels after four years in which the Trump
administration aggressively pursued energy production on public
lands.<br>
<br>
At Ms. Haaland’s confirmation hearing Senator John Barrasso,
Republican of Wyoming, noted that she has advocated for keeping
fossil fuels “in the ground.” He pressed her on where oil and gas
workers in his state and others that depend on drilling will work
if Mr. Biden’s drilling pause becomes permanent.<br>
<br>
Ms. Haaland sought to reassure Republicans that she would enact
Mr. Biden’s policies of pausing future fracking, not banning it.
In fact, Mr. Biden’s position is not far from Ms. Haaland’s. He
campaigned on a promise of “banning new oil and gas permitting on
public lands and waters,” and it remains unclear for now whether
the Biden administration will move forward with a permanent
moratorium.<br>
<br>
Ms. Sgamma, whose group has filed a lawsuit challenging Mr.
Biden’s executive order, said she believes the administration’s
review of the leasing program is actually designed to drag on for
the duration of Mr. Biden’s term.<br>
</p>
<p>“In the meantime, we will expect no leasing and a slowdown in
other permitted activity. That’s why this is not a pause’ on
leasing,” she said, adding, “Whether you call it a ‘pause’ or a
yearslong ban, it is unlawful and I like our chances in court.”<br>
<br>
Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation at EarthJustice, an
environmental group, said he hopes the early pause will be a down
payment on Mr. Biden’s campaign pledge.<br>
<br>
“The climate crisis and the biodiversity crisis isn’t standing
still,” he said.<br>
</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/02/climate/biden-interior-department-haaland.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/02/climate/biden-interior-department-haaland.html</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Big ice]<br>
<b>Radar images capture new Antarctic mega-iceberg</b><br>
By Jonathan Amos<br>
BBC Science Correspondent<br>
Radar satellites got their first good look at Antarctica's new
mega-iceberg over the weekend.<br>
<br>
The EU's Sentinel-1 and Germany's TerraSAR-X spacecraft both had
passes over the 1,290-sq-km (500-sq-mile) block, informally named
"A74".<br>
<br>
Their sensors showed the berg to have moved rapidly away from the
Brunt Ice Shelf - the floating platform from which it calved on
Friday.<br>
<br>
The good news is that no disturbance was felt at the UK's nearby
base.<br>
<br>
The Halley research station is sited just over 20km from the line of
fracture, but GPS stations installed around the facility reported
continued stability.<br>
<br>
"We didn't think there would be a reaction simply because,
glaciologically speaking, the ice around Halley is slightly
separated from the area that produced A74; there's not a good way
for stress to be transmitted across to the ice under the station,"
explained Dr Oliver Marsh from the British Antarctic Survey (BAS).<br>
<br>
"Since Friday's calving, we've had a lot more high-precision GPS
data that measures centimetre changes in strain along a whole range
of baselines, and none of these show anything different from what
was happening before the calving," he told BBC News...<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://twitter.com/laura_gerrish/status/1366331794900017160">https://twitter.com/laura_gerrish/status/1366331794900017160</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-56241503">https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-56241503</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
[Digging back into the internet news archive]<br>
<font size="+1"><b>On this day in the history of global warming -
March 4, 2013 </b></font><br>
<p>On Fox News Channel's "The O'Reilly Factor," Daryl Hannah
discusses the documentary "Greedy Lying Bastards."<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/2203432541001/daryl-hannah-enters-no-spin-zone/#sp=show-clips">http://video.foxnews.com/v/2203432541001/daryl-hannah-enters-no-spin-zone/#sp=show-clips</a><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/<br>
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html"><https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html></a>
/<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a><br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
*** Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender.<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>