<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><i><font size="+1"><b>March 11, 2021</b></font></i><br>
</p>
[Early season video report]<br>
<b>Arizona wildfire season off to early start</b><br>
The Punkin Fire burning in the Tonto National Forest is a reminder
that wildfire season in Arizona can be a year-round event.
Meanwhile, crews are preparing for a tough fire season ahead. FOX 10
spoke with Tiffany Davila with the Arizona Department of Forestry
and Fire Management<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.fox10phoenix.com/video/909609">https://www.fox10phoenix.com/video/909609</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
[California too]<br>
<b>Mudslides Trigger Canyons Evacuations, Road Closures Following
Brutal Wildfire Season</b><br>
Noah Biesiada - March 10, 2021<br>
Residents of Silverado, Modjeska and Williams canyons are under
mandatory evacuation orders this morning as mudslides began rolling
in following a series of wildfires at the end of last year. <br>
<br>
Silverado Canyon residents were the first to be ordered to evacuate.
Modjeska and Williams canyons were initially under voluntary
warnings, but those later became mandatory just before 11 a.m. An
evacuation center at El Modena High School opened at noon.<br>
<br>
Silverado Road is under nearly three feet of mud, according to the
county Public Works department...<br>
- -<br>
The National Weather Service shows there’s a 70% chance of continued
rain through the night, with a 40% chance of showers on Thursday and
Friday.<br>
<br>
Over half an inch of rain has already come down on Silverado alone
in the last 24 hours. The latest rainfall totals are available from
the National Weather Service.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://voiceofoc.org/2021/03/mudslides-trigger-silverado-canyon-evacuations-road-closures-following-brutal-wildfire-season/">https://voiceofoc.org/2021/03/mudslides-trigger-silverado-canyon-evacuations-road-closures-following-brutal-wildfire-season/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Reuters answers the big question]<br>
<b>Does smoking cannabis fuel the climate crisis?</b><br>
By Emma Batha<br>
LONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Is a beer, a cup of coffee or
a spliff more damaging for the climate? If the cannabis is
cultivated indoors on a commercial scale, the answer is probably the
joint.<br>
<br>
That’s the finding of researchers at Colorado State University who
say booming indoor marijuana production in the United States is a
major and growing source of greenhouse gas emissions that cause
global warming.<br>
<br>
The $13.6 billion industry has nearly quadrupled since 2012 when
Washington and Colorado became the first states to open the doors to
recreational use.<br>
<br>
But policymakers and consumers have largely ignored the
environmental cost of energy-hungry indoor cultivation, the
researchers said in a study.<br>
<br>
Nearly a third of U.S. states allow recreational use, while medical
cannabis is legal in about two-thirds.<br>
- -<br>
The research revealed a large variation in emissions across the
country, and within some states, with indoor cultivation in milder
climates requiring less heating or air conditioning to maintain
favourable temperatures and humidity.<br>
<br>
Producing 1 ounce (28g) of dried cannabis in eastern O’ahu in Hawaii
was roughly equal to burning 16 gallons (60 litres) of gasoline,
creating more than twice the emissions from growing the same amount
in southern California, the authors said.<br>
<br>
They suggested states that had already legalised cultivation should
steer indoor production towards regions with more optimal climates,
while states legalising cultivation in the future should consider
avoiding indoor production.<br>
<br>
However, they said switching production outdoors could create
security concerns and make it harder for growers to produce multiple
harvests a year and ensure consistency.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-climate-cannabis-idUSL8N2L7460">https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-climate-cannabis-idUSL8N2L7460</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
[recalculations]<br>
<b>Sea-Level Rise Affects Coastal Areas 4 Times Faster Than We
Thought. Here's Why</b><br>
PETER DOCKRILL - 9 MARCH 2021<br>
The sea is rising, but that's not all. Scientists say current
assessments of global sea-level rise have disregarded an important
phenomenon affecting coastal regions – an oversight that means the
ongoing specter of sea-level rise is even more ominous than we
knew...<br>
"About 58 percent of the world's coastal population lives on deltas
where land is subsiding."<br>
<br>
In a new study, Nicholls and his team quantified what sea-level rise
actually looks like in coastal areas, once subsidence – both natural
and human-caused – is taken into account.<br>
<br>
According to their calculations, relative sea-level rise in affected
regions is effectively happening up to four times faster than the
global average otherwise suggests: representing between 7.8 to 9.9
mm per year.<br>
- -<br>
Unfortunately, this same issue is happening in coastal regions all
over the world, and it's something that vastly alters the outlook of
what 2.6 millimetres of annual sea-level rise actually means where
it matters most.<br>
<br>
"Rapid rates of subsidence in deltas and especially cities on deltas
are also human-caused, mostly due to groundwater pumping, also oil
and gas extraction, and sediment resupply prevented by upstream
dams, flood defenses, sand extraction or mining," says coastal
engineer Robert Nicholls from the University of East Anglia in the
UK.<br>
- -<br>
It's not a far-off problem, either. Relative sea-level rise is
already affecting millions of people living in the world today.<br>
<br>
"The impacts of sea-level rise being experienced today are much
larger than the global numbers being reported by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)," Nicholls says.<br>
<br>
"One of the main reasons that Jakarta, the capital city of
Indonesia, is being moved to Borneo is because the city is sinking
due to groundwater extraction from shallow wells… Jakarta might be
just the beginning."<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.sciencealert.com/sea-level-rise-at-the-coast-is-happening-up-to-4-times-faster-than-we-thought">https://www.sciencealert.com/sea-level-rise-at-the-coast-is-happening-up-to-4-times-faster-than-we-thought</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
[the journal Nature Chlimate Change]<br>
<b>A global analysis of subsidence, relative sea-level change and
coastal flood exposure</b><br>
Abstract<br>
Climate-induced sea-level rise and vertical land movements,
including natural and human-induced subsidence in sedimentary
coastal lowlands, combine to change relative sea levels around the
world’s coasts. Although this affects local rates of sea-level rise,
assessments of the coastal impacts of subsidence are lacking on a
global scale. Here, we quantify global-mean relative sea-level rise
to be 2.5 mm yr−1 over the past two decades. However, as coastal
inhabitants are preferentially located in subsiding locations, they
experience an average relative sea-level rise up to four times
faster at 7.8 to 9.9 mm yr−1. These results indicate that the
impacts and adaptation needs are much higher than reported global
sea-level rise measurements suggest. In particular, human-induced
subsidence in and surrounding coastal cities can be rapidly reduced
with appropriate policy for groundwater utilization and drainage.
Such policy would offer substantial and rapid benefits to reduce
growth of coastal flood exposure due to relative sea-level rise.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-021-00993-z">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-021-00993-z</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
[also]<br>
<b>The Colossal Weight of Cities Is Making Them Sink, Even as Sea
Levels Are Rising</b><br>
DAVID NIELD16 FEBRUARY 2021<br>
Cities don't just have sea level rises to worry about – they're also
slowly sinking under the weight of their own development, according
to new research, which emphasises the importance of factoring
subsidence into models of climate change risk.<br>
Geophysicist Tom Parsons, from the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) agency, looked at San Francisco as a case study of how large
urban developments could be affecting and depressing the actual
surface of the Earth.<br>
<br>
By his calculations, San Francisco might have sunk as much as 80
millimetres (3.1 inches) as the city has grown over time.
Considering the Bay Area is under threat from as much as 300 mm
(11.8 inches) of sea level rise by 2050, the extra variation added
by slow subsidence is significant enough to be concerning.<br>
<br>
"As global populations move disproportionately toward the coasts,
this additional subsidence in combination with expected sea level
rise may exacerbate risk associated with inundation," writes Parsons
in his paper.<br>
- -<br>
"The specific results found for the San Francisco Bay Area are
likely to apply to any major urban centre, though with varying
importance," writes Parsons.<br>
<br>
"Anthropogenic loading effects at tectonically active continental
margins are likely greater than more stable continental interiors
where the lithosphere tends to be thicker and more rigid."<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.sciencealert.com/the-weight-of-cities-is-sinking-urban-areas-at-the-same-time-sea-levels-are-rising">https://www.sciencealert.com/the-weight-of-cities-is-sinking-urban-areas-at-the-same-time-sea-levels-are-rising</a><br>
<p> - -</p>
[Peer review available]<br>
AGU Advances Research Article<br>
<b>The Weight of Cities: Urbanization Effects on Earth's Subsurface</b><br>
Tom Parsons -- 14 January 2021 <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000277">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000277</a><br>
<blockquote>Abstract<br>
Across the world, people increasingly choose to live in cities. By
2050, 70% of Earth's population will live in large urban areas.
Upon considering a large city, questions arise such as, how much
does that weigh? What are its effects on the landscape? Does it
cause measurable subsidence? Here I calculate the weight of San
Francisco Bay region urbanization, where 7.75 million people live
at, or near the coast. It is difficult to account for everything
that is in a city. I assume that most of the weight is buildings
and their contents, which allows the use of base outline and
height data to approximate their mass, which is cumulatively
1.6·1012 kg. I build a series of finite element models to study
effects of pressure exerted by the weight distribution. Within the
elastic realm, I look at compression, flexure, isostatic
compensation, stress change, dilatation, and fluid flow changes.
Within the nonlinear realm I show example calculations of primary
and secondary settlement of soils under load. The combined modeled
subsidence from building loads is at least 5–80 mm, with the
largest contributions coming from nonlinear settlement and creep
in soils. A general result is closing of pore space and
redirection of pore fluids. While the calculated subsidence of the
Bay Area is relatively small compared with other sources of
elevation change such as pumping and recharge of aquifers, all
sources of subsidence are concerning given an expected 200–300 mm
sea level rise at San Francisco by the year 2050.<br>
</blockquote>
<b>Plain Language Summary</b><br>
By the year 2050, 70% of Earth's population will live in cities. The
belongings and needs of these growing populations concentrate mass
over relatively small areas. In this paper, I calculate the weight
of a metropolitan region and study the changes to the solid earth
beneath it using numerical modeling techniques. I find that the
subsidence under this weight is not insignificant and that it adds
to other causes of urban subsidence, such as ground water pumping.
As global populations move disproportionately toward the coasts,
this additional subsidence in combination with expected sea level
rise may exacerbate risk associated with inundation.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020AV000277">https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020AV000277</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[The Hill notices...]<br>
<b>Frightening' data show two-thirds of world's rainforest now
damaged or destroyed</b><br>
Tropical rainforests cover 6.5 percent of the Earth’s surface, yet
hold more than half of the planet’s biological diversity.<br>
By Joseph Guzman | March 10, 2021<br>
<blockquote>Story at a glance<br>
-- An analysis from nonprofit the Rainforest Foundation Norway
(RFN) found 34 percent of the world’s original tropical rainforest
cover is gone.<br>
-- Thirty percent is in various forms of degradation, and just 36
percent remains intact.<br>
-- Researchers lay the blame on human consumption, as agriculture,
logging and mining are primary drivers of deforestation across the
globe.<br>
-- A new report claims that two-thirds of the Earth’s original
tropical rainforest cover has been destroyed or degraded by
humans. <br>
</blockquote>
The Rainforest Foundation Norway (RFN) analysis released this month
found that of the approximately 14.5 million square kilometers of
tropical rainforest that once covered the planet, 34 percent is
gone, 30 percent is in various forms of degradation and just 36
percent remains intact.<br>
<br>
America is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your
Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.<br>
<br>
Of the 9.5 million square kilometers that remain, nearly half, 45
percent, is considered degraded, according to the Norwegian
nonprofit. Researchers lay the blame on human consumption, as
agriculture, logging and mining are primary drivers of deforestation
across the globe. <br>
<br>
According to the report, the area of rainforest lost between 2002
and 2019 was larger than the size of France. The RFN called the
current rate of destruction "frightening." <br>
<br>
“The good news is that we have an area half the size of Europe that
is still completely intact. However, the remaining tropical
rainforests are either severely damaged or increasingly fragmented,”
Anders Krogh, a tropical forest researcher and author of the report,
said in a news release...<br>
- -<br>
More than 70 percent of the world’s intact tropical rainforests is
located in the Amazon, with 42 percent in Brazil. Asia ranks second
in terms of forest destruction and holds just 7 percent of the
world’s rainforests today. <br>
<br>
Deforestation has spiked in Brazil since far-right President Jair
Bolsonaro took office in 2019 and has weakened environmental
enforcement and pushed for more mining and farming in the country. <br>
<br>
Deforestation in the Brazilian amazon hit a 10-year high between
August 2018 and July 2019, with nearly 10,000 square kilometers
lost.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://thehill.com/changing-america/sustainability/environment/542556-frightening-data-show-two-thirds-of-worlds">https://thehill.com/changing-america/sustainability/environment/542556-frightening-data-show-two-thirds-of-worlds</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
[Opinion and a little history makes for a great idea, let's start
tomorrow]<br>
<b>The Civilian Climate Corps Is a Big-Government Plan That All
Americans Can Embrace</b><br>
By Jim Lardner<br>
It was a rare case of Presidential understatement in the unveiling
of a program: the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of
the Interior, according to a paragraph buried in Joe Biden’s long
executive order on climate change, had been directed to make plans
for a Civilian Climate Corps, modelled on the Civilian
Conservation Corps—the C.C.C.—of the nineteen-thirties. It would
put underemployed Americans to work on projects intended “to
conserve and restore public lands and waters, bolster community
resilience, increase reforestation, increase carbon sequestration
in the agricultural sector, protect biodiversity, improve access
to recreation, and address the changing climate.”<br>
<br>
That is plenty of justification for such an initiative in the
country’s current circumstances. But the potential of this idea,
if the record of the original C.C.C. is any guide, goes far beyond
the advertised purposes. A modern-day C.C.C. could be an
attention-getting reminder of something that a great many
Americans seem to have forgotten: the capacity of government to be
an instrument of the common good.<br>
<br>
The Civilian Conservation Corps, created in the spring of 1933 at
the behest of the new President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, gave jobs
to an eventual three million young men, before the Second World
War took over the task of fighting unemployment. (Roughly
eighty-five hundred women participated in a “She-She-She” program,
belatedly established at Eleanor Roosevelt’s insistence.) The
C.C.C. left a legacy of trees, trails, shelters, footbridges,
picnic areas, and campgrounds in local, state, and national parks
across the country. It had equally notable effects on the health
and outlook of the men who served. Most were undernourished as
well as unemployed when they signed up. They came home with
muscles, tans, and, according to a letter sent to corps
headquarters, in Washington, by a resident of Romeo, Colorado, an
“erect carriage” that made them easy to pick out from the rest of
the young male population.<br>
<br>
Joseph Kaptur, of Toledo, Ohio, treasured the memory of his corps
service, spent reforesting the shores of the Miami and Erie Canal.
His gratitude stuck in the mind of his daughter Marcy Kaptur, now
an Ohio congresswoman and the sponsor of one of seven C.C.C. bills
introduced in Congress last year. “I don’t know anybody who wasn’t
changed and uplifted by that experience,” she says.<br>
<br>
Although Roosevelt sold the C.C.C. as a jobs program first and
foremost, it was shaped by his strong interest in timber and soil
management, acquired over the course of efforts to revitalize
hundreds of acres of badly tended farmland attached to his family
estate in Hyde Park, New York. The C.C.C., in turn, raised the
conservation consciousness of many of its participants, according
to “Nature’s New Deal,” a book from 2009 about the program, by the
historian Neil Maher. C.C.C. camps had lectures and night classes,
as well as libraries. A corpsman named Robert Ross, assigned to a
camp near Crystal Springs, Arkansas, used his off-hours to
investigate matters that he “had been totally ignorant of—soil
erosion, restoration, protection of the forests, the uses of land,
the damage of forest fires.” Less than ten per cent of the
enrollees had graduated from high school. Many of them learned to
read and write during their time in the corps, however, and
hundreds went on to jobs with the National Park Service, the
forestry-service unit of the Department of Agriculture, and other
federal, state, and local conservation programs.<br>
<br>
The C.C.C. had educational value for the people living alongside
its camps, too. Many communities, Maher writes, objected mightily
to the anticipated arrival of “street-slum foreigners,” “corner
holders,” and “bums.” The hostility tended to evaporate once
corpsmen came to town in person, proved unthreatening, and began
spending their wages at local diners, shops, and movie theatres.<br>
<br>
The program was hugely popular everywhere, and Roosevelt promoted
it as a morale booster in a time of extreme hardship—and as a
vote-getter in election years. Among his Administration’s many
groundbreaking policies, only this one escaped the anti-New Deal
fulminations of Alf Landon, the Republican governor of Kansas,
when he ran for President, in 1936. Landon, like other
Republicans, praised the corps; he even tried to take credit for
getting Congress to extend its operations to state parks. Despite
his claim, the presence of C.C.C. camps flipped several Kansas
counties blue and helped F.D.R. win the state in his landslide
reëlection victory.<br>
<br>
The revival of interest in the idea can be traced to two loose
groups of C.C.C. champions. One, whose ranks include the retired
General Stanley McChrystal and the Starbucks founder Howard
Schultz—who are among the backers of an initiative called Serve
America Together—sees a way to overcome the “political, social,
economic and religious barriers causing such divisiveness in our
country,” as McChrystal and Schultz put it in a joint op-ed last
summer. The other group, composed mainly of academic economists,
is more concerned about the job-replacing effects of robots and
computers, and the marketplace’s chronic failure to meet important
social needs. Those two streams of thinking converged and gained
force last spring, after the pandemic abruptly terminated the
employment of some twenty million Americans.<br>
<br>
In addition to the White House plan and Representative Kaptur’s
measure, bills have been introduced by Colorado’s Joe Neguse and
Illinois’s Bobby Rush, in the House, and by Delaware’s Chris
Coons, Illinois’s Dick Durbin, and Oregon’s Ron Wyden, in the
Senate. Thinking separately, they have come to common conclusions
about what a new C.C.C. should be like—and what it shouldn’t be
like. The original corps, besides excluding women, was racially
segregated, with camps for African-Americans often placed in
remote areas, according to Maher, “because of local protests in
every region of the country, including the North.” A
twenty-first-century C.C.C. would correct those fundamental
defects. Most of the idea’s backers agree that it should also pay
a living wage, in contrast to Roosevelt’s program, which offered
room and board and thirty dollars a month (about six hundred
dollars in today’s money), with most of it earmarked for families
back home.<br>
<br>
Another difference: cities and suburbs could be major work sites
this time around. Openlands, a Chicago-based nonprofit that
collaborated with Durbin on his plan, has drawn up a list of
project categories, including brownfield remediation, the greening
of schoolyards, the repair of biking and walking trails, and the
planting of urban vegetable gardens and orchards. Senator Bob
Casey, a Democrat of Pennsylvania with his own C.C.C. proposal in
the works, imagines a corps that would build and improve parks in
green-starved inner-city neighborhoods and reverse the loss of
tree canopy that has made cities especially vulnerable to global
warming.<br>
<br>
Casey has allied himself with the coalition of more than a hundred
organizations behind an economic-policy package called
“Reimagining Appalachia.” It proposes a C.C.C. that would restore
wetlands and areas scarred by coal-mining while making room for
ex-prisoners, victims of opioid addiction, and others unlikely to
be hired by private employers. Along the way, Casey says, such a
program could have the salutary effect of reminding rural and
urban Americans that “they have very similar and overlapping
problems,” including cycles of community decay set off by the
exodus of well-paid jobs, whether in mining or manufacturing.<br>
<br>
The White House effort is focussed, for now, on developing an
administrative structure (it is likely to build on AmeriCorps, a
Clinton-era national-service program) and finding funds in the
existing budgets of the Agriculture Department, the Interior
Department, and other federal agencies to get a fledgling corps up
and running. Putting more serious money into such a program would
require Congress’s coöperation and, perhaps, a degree of
bipartisanship.<br>
<br>
That might not be outside the bounds of possibility. Although
Democrats have been the principal instigators of legislation so
far, there are signs of Republican enthusiasm for the idea,
aligning as it does with the party’s preference for work over cash
relief. Seven G.O.P. senators—including Lindsey Graham, of South
Carolina; Roger Wicker, of Mississippi; and Bill Cassidy, of
Louisiana—signed on as co-sponsors of the Coons bill, which was
comparatively modest in scale and tailored to Republican tastes
(omitting all mention of climate change, for example). With that
show of bipartisan support, it came close to being included in the
pandemic-relief package passed in December.<br>
<br>
The prospects for some version of a revived C.C.C. are favorable.
To realize an ambitious version of the idea, the Biden
Administration would have to bring a sense of urgency to the
effort. It should. The Administration, with its $1.9 trillion
“American Rescue Plan,” hopes to accelerate the pace of
vaccinations, expedite the reopening of schools, give tens of
millions of stressed-out Americans the wherewithal to pay their
bills, and get a frozen economy moving. There is little in this
measure, however, to lift a vast number of Americans—including
roughly four million who have been unemployed for more than six
months, and more than fifty million low-wage workers whose annual
median income, according to the Brookings Institution, is eighteen
thousand dollars—who were already feeling disheartened and
undervalued when the pandemic came along.<br>
<br>
Trumpist Republicans, fixated for the moment on settling
intra-party scores, will turn their attention back to Biden and
the Democrats before long. The backward elements of corporate
America and Wall Street have been quiet lately, perhaps out of a
sense of pandemic-induced propriety, but they, too, can be counted
on to get back to obstruction mode. The best things that the new
Administration has said and done—its commitments to racial and
gender equity, its welcoming attitude toward immigrants, its
seriousness about climate change—guarantee blowback.<br>
<br>
Biden and his party can take comfort in opinion surveys that show
overwhelming support for many of their proposals. To go by the
polls, however, wide majorities of Americans have come down on the
side of progressive policies for years. Meanwhile, mounting
distrust of government has led many of those same people to
consistently not vote for candidates committed to putting
progressive policies into effect.<br>
<br>
That dynamic will probably be with us until Americans without
wealth or privilege see convincing evidence (more convincing than
checks in the mail, however badly they are needed) of the
government working zealously and effectively on their behalf. The
old C.C.C. told that story in Roosevelt’s time. A new one could
tell it in ours.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-civilian-climate-corps-is-a-big-government-plan-that-all-americans-can-embrace">https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-civilian-climate-corps-is-a-big-government-plan-that-all-americans-can-embrace</a><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Digging back into the internet news archive]<br>
<font size="+1"><b>On this day in the history of global warming -
March 11, 2009 </b></font><br>
<p>MSNBC's Keith Olbermann rips Paul Dellegatto, meteorologist for
Tampa, Florida Fox affiliate WTVT, for failing to forecast the
facts about human-caused climate change:<br>
<br>
"[I]n the middle of a forecast [Dellegatto] declared global
warming was no longer a threat. [Dellegatto stated,] 'Athens,
Georgia, just about a week ago, and they had up to half a foot of
snow. Las Vegas got snow. It actually snowed in New Orleans this
winter.' Dellegatto went on to say the current warming trend
peaked in 1998 and, quote, 'I just think the whole global warming
doomsayer theory is tough to see, based on recent calculations.'<br>
<br>
"Once again, this is science‘s fault. Never should have used the
phrase 'global warming.' 'Weather disaster' would have worked.
The mistake was they thought even the dimmer folks would realize
during global warming, it could get colder from time to time,
especially in the places where it‘s not supposed to, like Tampa
last month, when it got down to 28 here. This guy missed it,
obviously because he was more worried about putting in global
warming denial propaganda into the local freaking weather forecast
on the local freaking Fox station!"<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nbcnews.com/video/countdown/29645384#29645384">http://www.nbcnews.com/video/countdown/29645384#29645384</a><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/<br>
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html"><https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html></a>
/<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a><br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
*** Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender.<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain must be used for
democratic and election purposes and cannot be used for commercial
purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>