<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><i><font size="+1"><b>July 2, 2021</b></font></i></p>
[President Biden meets with Western state governors to discuss ways
to combat drought, heat and wildfires]<br>
<b>Biden pledges better pay for firefighters as he hosts virtual
meeting of Western governors</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/06/30/joe-biden-live-updates/">https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/06/30/joe-biden-live-updates/</a>
<p><br>
</p>
[Cough, cough]<br>
<b>Smoke from California wildfires moving in to Oregon</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.opb.org/article/2021/07/01/smoke-california-oregon-wildfire/">https://www.opb.org/article/2021/07/01/smoke-california-oregon-wildfire/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
[Stinging Exxon - disinformation wars]<br>
<b>In Video, Exxon Lobbyist Describes Efforts to Undercut Climate
Action</b><br>
On the tape, made in a Greenpeace sting, he described working with
“shadow groups” to fight climate science, and detailed efforts to
weaken President Biden’s proposals to burn less oil.<br>
By Hiroko Tabuchi - June 30, 2021<br>
The veteran oil-industry lobbyist was told he was meeting with a
recruiter. But the video call, which was secretly recorded, was part
of an elaborate sting operation by an individual working for the
environmental group Greenpeace UK.<br>
<br>
During the call, Keith McCoy, a senior director of federal relations
for Exxon Mobil, described how the oil and gas giant targeted a
number of influential United States senators in an effort to weaken
climate action in President Biden’s flagship infrastructure plan.
That plan now contains few of the ambitious ideas initially proposed
by Mr. Biden to cut the burning of fossil fuels, the main driver of
climate change.<br>
<br>
Mr. McCoy also said on the recording that Exxon’s support for a tax
on carbon dioxide was “a great talking point” for the oil company,
but that he believes the tax will never happen. He also said that
the company has in the past aggressively fought climate science
through “shadow groups.”<br>
<br>
On Wednesday, excerpts from the conversation were aired by the
British broadcaster Channel 4. The affiliate of Greenpeace that
recorded the video, Unearthed, also released excerpts.<br>
<br>
In a statement, Darren Woods, Exxon’s chief executive, said the
comments “in no way represent the company’s position on a variety of
issues, including climate policy, and our firm commitment that
carbon pricing is important to addressing climate change.” Mr. McCoy
and another lobbyist interviewed by Greenpeace “were never involved
in developing the company’s policy positions on the issues
discussed,” he said.<br>
<br>
“We condemn the statements and are deeply apologetic for them,
including comments regarding interactions with elected officials.
They are entirely inconsistent with the way we expect our people to
conduct themselves. We were shocked by these interviews and stand by
our commitments to working on finding solutions to climate change,”
Mr. Woods said.<br>
<br>
The lobbyist’s remarks came after Exxon, one of the world’s largest
fossil fuel producers, has in recent years said it backs the Paris
climate accord’s goal of limiting global warming to well below 2
degrees Celsius compared with preindustrial levels.<br>
<br>
In what has been hailed as a significant shift for the company,
Exxon has also thrown public support behind the idea of a carbon
tax, a fee on the carbon content of fossil fuels meant to discourage
emissions by making goods that are more polluting to manufacture
more expensive. Carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil
fuels trap the sun’s heat and are a major contributor to climate
change.<br>
<br>
In advertising campaigns, Exxon has presented itself as a part of
the solution to, rather than a cause of, climate change. Mr. McCoy
painted a different picture of Exxon’s efforts behind the scenes. In
the recording, he said the company targeted a number of influential
senators with the aim of scaling back the climate provisions in
President Biden’s sweeping infrastructure bill by scrapping the tax
increases that would pay for it.<br>
<br>
“We’re playing defense because President Biden is talking about this
big infrastructure package and he’s going to pay for it by
increasing corporate taxes,” Mr. McCoy said in the video call. But
if the plan stuck to “roads and bridges,” the budget would be
reduced greatly and limit the need for tax increases, a move that
would save Exxon close to a billion dollars, he said.<br>
<br>
The Exxon lobbyist also expressed skepticism over the idea of taxing
carbon pollution produced by burning fossil fuels — a measure pushed
by some Republicans as “a conservative climate solution” based on
free-market principles. Mr. Woods, Exxon’s chief executive, has also
argued that instead of an “inefficient patchwork of regulations” in
the United States, the federal government should instead simply tax
carbon.<br>
<br>
Mr. McCoy seemed to contradict that position. “Nobody is going to
propose a tax on all Americans. And the cynical side of me says
yeah, we kind of know that,” he said. “But it gives us a talking
point.”<br>
<br>
Alex Flint, executive director of the Alliance for Market Solutions,
which has led the push for a carbon tax, said his experience with
Exxon’s lobbyists was that “they are genuinely committed to a carbon
tax and realize that a lot of work needs to be done.”<br>
<br>
On the video call recorded by Greenpeace, Mr. McCoy defended the
company’s efforts to mislead the public on climate change, even as
the company’s own scientists were recognizing greenhouse gas
emissions as a risk to the planet. “Did we aggressively fight
against some of the science? Yes. Did we hide our science?
Absolutely not,” Mr. McCoy said. “Did we join some of these shadow
groups to work against some of the early efforts? Yes, that’s true.”<br>
<br>
Mr. McCoy didn’t identify the groups. Exxon Mobil has spent millions
of dollars funding conservative groups that challenge established
climate science. “But there’s nothing illegal about that,” he said.
“We were looking out for our investments. We were looking out for
our shareholders.”<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/30/climate/exxon-greenpeace-lobbyist-video.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/30/climate/exxon-greenpeace-lobbyist-video.html</a>
<p>- -</p>
[see the video from TV journalist]<br>
<b>Revealed: ExxonMobil’s lobbying war on climate change legislation</b><br>
Jun 30, 2021<br>
Channel 4 News<br>
<br>
They're America's biggest oil company - committed they claim, to
tackling the climate emergency. But tonight this programme can
reveal undercover footage of one of Exxonmobil's top Washington
lobbyists - speaking candidly about his efforts to undermine new
legislation to protect the environment. The lobbyist was captured on
camera by the environmental group Greenpeace UK - boasting of how
Exxonmobil has fought climate science, and operated behind closed
doors to water down green legislation. Exxonmobil dispute the
claims - and accuse Greenpeace of "waging a campaign against them".
In the first part of a series of reports on the secretive world of
fossil fuel lobbying - our Chief Correspondent Alex Thomson has this
exclusive story.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5v1Yg6XejyE">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5v1Yg6XejyE</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
[AOC - Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]<br>
<b>ExxonMobil lobbying tactics ‘used against’ climate legislation
are ‘shameful’</b><br>
Jul 1, 2021<br>
Channel 4 News<br>
We spoke to leading Democrat Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
and began by asking for her reaction to our ExxonMobil revelations.
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m7laYy5Zz4">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m7laYy5Zz4</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Greenpeace report]<br>
<b>Inside Exxon’s playbook: How the oil giant works through front
groups to head-off regulations on toxic chemicals and plastics</b><br>
ExxonMobil worked with groups including the powerful American
Chemistry Council to influence policy on 'forever chemicals' and
plastic waste, insider tells undercover reporter<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2021/07/01/exxon-undercover-pfas-plastic-chemicals/">https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2021/07/01/exxon-undercover-pfas-plastic-chemicals/</a><br>
<p>- -<br>
</p>
[the duped one apologizes]<br>
<b>Exxon Lobbyist Issues Apology on LinkedIn as Company Goes Into
Damage Control</b><br>
The lobbyist caught admitting internal strategy on tape has
apologized, while Exxon seeks to distance itself.<br>
- -<br>
Keith McCoy, a senior director of federal relations at Exxon, took
most of the heat in the segment for his comments on, among other
things, how the company’s carbon tax endorsement is a “great talking
point” because it’ll never actually come to pass. He took to—where
else?—LinkedIn on Wednesday to issue an apology...<br>
- -<br>
“I am deeply embarrassed by my comments and that I allowed myself to
fall for Greenpeace’s deception,” his post reads. “My statements
clearly do not represent ExxonMobil’s positions on important public
policy issues. While some of my comments were taken out of context,
there is no excuse for what I said or how I said it. I apologize to
all my colleagues at the company and my friends in Washington, D.C.,
all of whom have a right to expect better of me.”<br>
<br>
Like most places on the internet, the LinkedIn comment section is a
pretty tough crowd. McCoy was roasted for the “PR lip service”
apologies while other users advocated for Exxon’s managed decline.
McCoy does have some support, though. One of the people who “liked”
the post is George David Banks, a former senior adviser to President
George W. Bush on climate change and who served a brief tenure as a
special assistant to former President Donald Trump for international
energy and environment, where he treated us to a baffling defense of
Trump’s infamous “global warming is a Chinese hoax” tweet. Banks
stepped down after he was told he wouldn’t receive full security
clearance because he’d smoked too much weed in the past (relatable,
tbh).<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://gizmodo.com/exxon-lobbyist-issues-apology-on-linkedin-as-company-go-1847210308">https://gizmodo.com/exxon-lobbyist-issues-apology-on-linkedin-as-company-go-1847210308</a>
<p>- -</p>
[Call it the Moon Walk]<br>
<b>Exxon Mounts Feeble Walkback After Lobbyist Caught on Camera
Telling Truth About Anti-Climate Agenda</b><br>
The oil giant would like you to know that statements from its
“Senior Director for Federal Relations” in no way represent its
position on federal climate policy<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/caught-on-camera-exxonmobil-lobbyist-touts-anti-climate-actions-1192057/">https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/caught-on-camera-exxonmobil-lobbyist-touts-anti-climate-actions-1192057/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>[a well established wake-up call]<br>
</p>
<p><b>‘This is a wake-up call’: Canada heatwave a sign of uncertain
years to come, scientists warn</b><br>
Experts say the soaring temperatures are ‘unequivocally’ a sign of
climate change, reports Ashleigh Stewart in Toronto<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.independent.co.uk/independentpremium/world/canada-temperatures-heatwave-climate-change-b1875709.html">https://www.independent.co.uk/independentpremium/world/canada-temperatures-heatwave-climate-change-b1875709.html</a><br>
<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
[McKibben]<br>
<b>The World Speeds Up—and We Slow Down</b><br>
Climate destruction is now moving much faster than human
institutions.<br>
By Bill McKibben<br>
- -<br>
Leaked drafts of the next big report from the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change indicate that it will be even more dire than
its predecessors. “I suspect what we will face is further urgency
and the need to go further, faster,” the head of the Glasgow talks
said.<br>
<br>
You would think that changes in the planet’s climate would take a
very long time and changes in human opinion and action could happen
fast. You’d think that sentience would be an aid. But, instead, it
appears that we are slow and that nature—supercharged by our
carbon—is fast as hell. Since the climate crisis isn’t going to slow
down, our only option is to speed up.<br>
- -<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-a-warming-planet/the-world-speeds-up-and-we-slow-down">https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-a-warming-planet/the-world-speeds-up-and-we-slow-down</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[promotion]<br>
<b>The Chamber of Commerce Has Been Exposed as One of the Primary
Obstacles to Climate Action</b><br>
Internal documents suggest the Chamber acknowledged the threat in
1989—and spent many of the years since trying to block a response.<br>
By Charles P. Pierce - Jun 30, 2021<br>
In 2010, scientists opened the Climate and Development Lab at Brown
University to study various aspects of the climate crisis. The Lab’s
work covers all facets of the vast crisis and it produces reports,
and policy papers, and both op-ed columns and online commentary.
This week, with impeccable timing if you happen to live in the
Pacific Northwest, the CDL produced a report detailing the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce’s longtime role as one of the primary
obstructions to coping seriously with the crisis, and its complicity
in the dangerous practice of climate denial.<br>
<blockquote>After acknowledging potential adverse climate impacts
predicted by climate science in 1989, the Chamber shifted to
discourses of climate uncertainty and denial.<br>
<br>
After a decade of articulating a fundamental conflict between
climate action and economic prosperity, the Chamber began
suggesting that a long-term, non-transformative strategy for
climate progress could combine formerly competing objectives.<br>
<br>
After delaying addressing whether or not climate change was a
solvable challenge, the Chamber introduced 'surrender' discourses
that discredited the possibility of remedying climate change.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>The Chamber framed non-transformative visions for
climate governance when significant opportunities for climate
progress were absent, while directly discrediting those policies
and regulatory action when opportunities were present.<br>
<br>
Bill Kovacs pushed the Chamber to more extreme and dramatic
positions on climate change.<br>
</blockquote>
The report itself is a fascinating account of how the Chamber has
back-slid on the crisis ever since 1989. The report quotes internal
Chamber documents from that year, when NASA’s James Hansen sounded
the alarm for the first time:<br>
<blockquote>There is qualitative agreement among prognosticators
that sea levels will rise, wetlands will flood, salt water will
infuse fresh water supplies, and there will be changes in the
distribution of tree and crop species and agricultural
productivity.<br>
</blockquote>
By the 2000s, according to documents obtained by the authors of the
report, the Chamber still acknowledged the gravity of the crisis
but, apparently, it had decided that things were already beyond
hope. The report traces how this shift happened, and how it
eventually morphed into obfuscation and denial.<br>
<blockquote>First, the Chamber utilized 16 unique “discourses of
delay” to discount climate science and dismiss a series of policy
proposals.<br>
<br>
Second, the frequency by which the Chamber employed these
discourses shifted significantly between presidential
administrations.<br>
<br>
Third, after affirming climate science in an internal May 1989
presentation, the U.S. Chamber shifted to frequent climate
skepticism that culminated in a public denial of climate science
during the ‘Scopes Monkey Trial’ moment of 2009. ...<br>
<br>
Sixth, over the course of the 1989-2009 period, the Chamber tended
to ‘diagnose’ climate change and policy challenges when
significant climate policy opportunities were absent, and frame
discussions in prognostic, motivational, and policy-specific terms
when they were present.<br>
<br>
Finally, the Chamber’s messaging about climate change became
markedly more extreme, dramatic, and aggressive during the 2000s,
likely related to the hiring of William Kovacs as Vice President
of its Environment, Technology, and Regulatory Affairs group.<br>
</blockquote>
Kovacs appears as the primary individual villain in the Brown
center’s report.<br>
<blockquote>Discussions of climate science during the George W. Bush
administration in this report’s source material were mostly
concentrated in the 2003 & 2005 Reality Check reports, but the
Chamber returned to climate skepticism discourses during the early
Obama administration. In 2009, Kovacs led a campaign urging the
EPA to host a public, on-the-record ‘trial’ on the science of
climate change before moving forward with its endangerment
finding. The Chamber’s trial would be modeled after the historic
Scopes Monkey Trial, which brought evolutionary science to the US
court system…What is apparent is that Kovacs had an outsized role
in shaping Chamber climate discourses after his hire in 1998, and
did so in a way that garnered attention, seeded doubt, and
solidified the U.S. Chamber as a public climate obstruction
organization during the first decade of the 21st century.<br>
</blockquote>
I’ve long worried that the political institutions of this country
are wholly inadequate to confront the profound crisis that already
is upon us, let alone what’s coming next. The U.S. Chamber of
Commerce is a political institution that doesn’t give a damn, one
way or another.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a36891796/chamber-of-commerce-climate-denial/">https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a36891796/chamber-of-commerce-climate-denial/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[follow the money]<br>
<b>A Major New Index Fund Should Unnerve Climate-Skeptical CEOs</b><br>
The hedge fund that staged a revolt at Exxon last month is now
recruiting an army of mom-and-pop investors for future battles.<br>
By Robinson Meyer<br>
- -<br>
The new Engine No. 1 Transition 500 Fund is, in other words, a
low-fee, diversified index fund of the type that now dominates the
American stock market. Yet unlike other index-fund providers, which
sit out some fights with management, Engine No. 1 has pledged to
crusade. When Engine No. 1 campaigns against a company’s leadership,
shares held by the Transition 500 ETF will vote for its slate. The
ETF will trade on the stock market, appropriately, under the ticker
symbol VOTE.<br>
- -<br>
Last year, when I covered Betterment’s attempt to put a
climate-friendly portfolio together, I wished for an ETF just like
VOTE—a fund that tried to reshape the market not by withdrawing
money from some places and investing it in others but by engaging
directly with corporate leadership and using the power of
shareholder voting to push boards forward. “But right now, no such
fund exists,” I concluded.<br>
<br>
Now such a fund does. I think VOTE is a natural complement to a
divestment strategy, especially as clean energy gets cheaper and the
financial costs of fighting climate change for any one firm decline.
Engine No. 1 contends that such a strategy will bring in higher
returns too. “We believe that for companies to create shareholder
value, they need to focus on investments they make in communities,
employees, customers, and the environment,” O’Leary said. “If, over
time, companies are focused on those externalities, they are best
positioned to succeed. Engine No. 1 will focus on those issues and
find the opportunities where our votes will be the most effective.”
We’ll find out if that investing hypothesis holds.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2021/06/climate-focused-hedge-funds-new-index-fund-engine-no-1/619264/">https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2021/06/climate-focused-hedge-funds-new-index-fund-engine-no-1/619264/</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
[fire forecast]<br>
<b>Above normal wildfire activity predicted in the Northwest for
July and August</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wildfiretoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/month1_outlook.png">https://wildfiretoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/month1_outlook.png</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wildfiretoday.com/2021/07/01/above-normal-wildfire-activity-predicted-in-the-northwest-for-july-and-august/">https://wildfiretoday.com/2021/07/01/above-normal-wildfire-activity-predicted-in-the-northwest-for-july-and-august/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Like Snakes on a Plane]<br>
<b>Rattlesnakes may be one of the only winners of climate change
crisis</b><br>
The heat-loving reptiles could thrive in warmer temperatures.<br>
Amanda Kooser - June 30, 2021 <br>
- -<br>
The climate change news has been bad for humanity. Drought. Warmer
temperatures. Rising sea levels. Wildfires. Extreme weather. There
may be at least one denizen of Earth that could be OK with this
mess: rattlesnakes.<br>
<br>
A study led by researchers at California Polytechnic State
University suggests the venomous snakes commonly found in the US
Southwest could benefit from a bump in heat. The paper is published
in the journal Ecology and Evolution.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.cnet.com/news/rattlesnakes-may-be-one-of-the-only-winners-of-climate-change-crisis/">https://www.cnet.com/news/rattlesnakes-may-be-one-of-the-only-winners-of-climate-change-crisis/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[ramifications]<br>
<b>Focused on a hurricane's wind speeds? Here's other hazards you
should know about.</b><br>
Cheryl McCloud<br>
Naples Daily News<br>
Hurricanes are a known threat along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts,
but that threat can be broken down into several specific hazards,
not just wind. <br>
<br>
A hurricane is categorized based on its wind speed. A hurricane is
born when wind speeds reach 74 mph. A major hurricane, with winds of
111 mph or higher, can bring major and up to catastrophic damage to
a community.<br>
<br>
While the category of a hurricane depends on its wind speed, wind is
only one of the many hazards posed by a storm.<br>
<blockquote>The major hazards associated with hurricanes are:<br>
<blockquote>storm surge and storm tide<br>
heavy rainfall and inland flooding<br>
high winds<br>
rip currents<br>
tornadoes<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.naplesnews.com/story/weather/hurricanes/2021/07/01/nhc-hurricanes-bring-deadly-storm-surge-wind-heavy-rain-tornadoes-flooding-rip-currents/4856202001/">https://www.naplesnews.com/story/weather/hurricanes/2021/07/01/nhc-hurricanes-bring-deadly-storm-surge-wind-heavy-rain-tornadoes-flooding-rip-currents/4856202001/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
[The news archive - looking back]<br>
<font size="+1"><b>On this day in the history of global warming July
2, 2006</b></font><br>
<p>July 2, 2006: Notorious climate denier Dick Lindzen whines,
moans, kvetches and complains about "An Inconvenient Truth" in a
piece for the Wall Street Journal's OpinionJournal.com. <br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://web.archive.org/web/20060705111127/http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597">http://web.archive.org/web/20060705111127/http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597</a>
<br>
</p>
<br>
<p>/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/</p>
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html"
moz-do-not-send="true"><https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html></a>
/<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a><br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"
moz-do-not-send="true"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
- Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a hobby production curated by Richard
Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote" moz-do-not-send="true">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote" moz-do-not-send="true"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://TheClimate.Vote</a> <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"
moz-do-not-send="true"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>