<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<i><font size="+1"><b>July 10, 2021</b></font></i>
<p>[“This is the hottest summer of my life,” Bart Simpson says in a
meme that’s been making the rounds. Homer’s response: “This is the
coldest summer of the rest of your life.”] <b><br>
</b></p>
<b>Death Valley soars to 130 degrees, matching Earth’s highest
temperature in at least 90 years</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2021/07/09/death-valley-record-high-temperature/">https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2021/07/09/death-valley-record-high-temperature/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
[See the conditions]<br>
<b>Death Valley National Park</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nps.gov/deva/planyourvisit/furnace-creek-campground.htm">https://www.nps.gov/deva/planyourvisit/furnace-creek-campground.htm</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
[Activism]<br>
<b>On climate policy, there's one main thing and then there's
everything else</b><br>
Clean electrification is the entrée; everything else is a side.<br>
- -<br>
How can the US hit net-zero emissions by or before 2050, a goal
shared by almost every Democrat and, at least rhetorically, by some
Republicans?<br>
<br>
The key is to immediately begin reducing emissions and maintain a
rapid pace of reduction for the coming three decades. That is the
only way we have a shot. If we wait another decade to start rapid
reductions, the curve will simply be too steep. It has to start now.<br>
<br>
So we can think of the work in two parts. Job One is to rapidly push
fossil fuels out of the system using technologies and strategies
that we have on hand, such that we reduce carbon emissions by around
50 percent by 2030. Job Two is to research and develop the
technologies and strategies we will need to continue rapidly
reducing emissions from 2030 onward, such that we hit net-zero on or
before 2050.<br>
<br>
Job Two is important. But Job One is the main thing. Job One is the
entrée. Without it, you don’t have a meal.<br>
<br>
What does Job One consist of? This is important: while different
climate models disagree about which policies and technologies will
be needed to clean up remaining emissions after 2030, virtually all
of them agree on what’s needed over the next decade. It’s clean
electrification: clean up the electricity grid by replacing fossil
fuel power plants with renewable energy, batteries, and other
zero-carbon resources; clean up transportation by replacing gasoline
and diesel vehicles — passenger vehicles, delivery trucks and vans,
semi-trucks, small planes, agricultural and mining equipment, etc. —
with electric vehicles; and clean up buildings by replacing furnaces
and other appliances that run on fossil fuels with electric
equivalents.<br>
<br>
Or as I summarize it: electrify everything!<br>
<br>
Clean electrification is the entrée...<br>
- -<br>
Clean electrification is the entrée. If you decarbonize electricity,
transportation, and buildings, you’ve taken out the three biggest
sources of emissions in virtually every country. The technologies
and policies we need to do it exist today, ready to deploy...<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.volts.wtf/p/on-climate-policy-theres-one-main">https://www.volts.wtf/p/on-climate-policy-theres-one-main</a>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Information battleground]<br>
<b>What the Exxon Tapes Reveal About the American Petroleum
Institute’s Lobbying Tactics on Oil Trains</b><br>
The top oil trade group, which a senior Exxon lobbyist recently
described as one of the company’s “whipping boys,” used similar
delay tactics to push back against oil-by-rail safety rules.<br>
What the Exxon Tapes Reveal About the American Petroleum Institute’s
Lobbying Tactics on Oil Trains<br>
Justin Mikulkaon - - Jul 9, 2021<br>
Senior ExxonMobil lobbyists were recently exposed by undercover
reporting from UnEarthed, an investigative journalism project of
Greenpeace, which captured footage of the employees explaining how
the oil giant influences policy makers using trade associations like
the American Petroleum Institute (API).<br>
<br>
The undercover footage revealed Exxon lobbyists boasting about wins
for the company under the Trump administration and admitting to
continued efforts to sow doubt about climate change and undermine
action to tackle the crisis. <br>
<br>
The recordings also confirmed the findings of years of DeSmog
research on API’s lobbying tactics. “Did we aggressively fight
against some of the science? Yes. Did we hide our science?
Absolutely not,” Keith McCoy, a senior director in ExxonMobil’s
Washington, D.C. government affairs team, told the undercover
reporter Lawrence Carter. “Did we join some of these ‘shadow groups’
to work against some of the early efforts? Yes, that’s true. But
there’s nothing illegal about that. You know, we were looking out
for our investments; we were looking out for our shareholders.”...<br>
- -<br>
After years of covering the regulatory process governing oil trains,
one fact stood out: API was almost always leading the process. Even
though the process was supposed to be about improving rail safety,
the oil industry played the dominant role. Exxon representatives
were rarely seen in the many public Congressional or regulatory
agency hearings and did not take a public role in fighting the
regulations. However, as DeSmog reported, Exxon was meeting in
private with federal regulators and arguing against stronger
regulations on oil trains...<br>
- -<br>
Much of my book Bomb Trains: How Industry Greed and Regulatory
Failure Put the Public at Risk highlights how API successfully uses
“The Hill” — i.e. Congress — to stop regulation and describes the
central role the organization plays, as noted in this passage in
which National Transportation Safety Board Chair Deborah Hersman
asks API representative Lee Johnson when safer rail tank cars could
be expected:<br>
<br>
In Congressional hearings, at rail industry conferences, and in
funding supposedly independent studies of the issue, it was always
API dictating what happened on “The Hill.” <br>
<br>
As revealed by UnEarthed, Exxon lobbyist McCoy spelled out how it
works in the recently released recordings: <br>
<br>
“So you start to build out a coalition of associations. Now,
companies feed into that privately where we have meetings, but the
public face of it are the associations: they go to the Hill, they
have these conversations.” <br>
<br>
Exxon was rarely mentioned in the oil-by-rail regulatory process
even though API was omnipresent. However, as McCoy noted, Exxon is
directing API. On the tapes, he described how it worked, saying,
“And so the API staff person who worked on that issue, We’d say, you
know, ‘Hey Tom, you need to go to The Hill and you need to have a
conversation with the committee.’” <br>
<br>
This is similar to what Scott Sheffield, CEO of U.S. oil company
Pioneer Resources, said in 2020 when he told CNBC that it was Exxon
leading discussions on a possible industry bailout and that Exxon
“controls the API.” <br>
- -<br>
In 2016, Suzanne Lemieux, a representative of the American Petroleum
Institute, spoke at an energy-by-rail conference. She argued against
the idea that the volatile oil being transported by rail needed to
be regulated in a presentation titled, “Crude Oil Volatility: Myth
vs. Fact.” <br>
<br>
Her message was quite clear. <br>
<br>
“I would say that all of these conversations about [how] Bakken is
inherently more dangerous, it’s more volatile, etcetera, etcetera,
those things from a chemical properties perspective just aren’t
true. And so we in the oil and gas industry see this as a very
dangerous conversation.”<br>
<br>
Forty seven people died because of the oil industry’s dangerous
product. However, API took the position that even discussing how to
avoid a repeat of the oil train explosion at Lac-Megantic was too
dangerous of a conversation to have. <br>
<br>
And it worked. <br>
<br>
DeSmog contacted Exxon and the American Petroleum Institute
inquiring if the two coordinated efforts to influence oil-by-rail
regulations. <br>
<br>
“As a member-driven organization, we collaborate across our
membership on a wide range of policy issues, from advancing smart
and effective regulations and strong standards for rail safety to
advocating for lower-carbon solutions to tackle climate change,”
said API spokeswoman Bethany Aronhalt via email. “We also continue
to advocate for modernized pipeline infrastructure, which is the
safest most efficient way to deliver the energy Americans rely on
every single day.” <br>
<br>
Exxon did not respond other than to ask for specific questions,
which were provided, but not answered. <br>
<br>
For much greater detail on how the oil-by-rail regulatory process
unfolded, read Chapter 4, “Follow the Money,” of my book Bomb
Trains, which dives into API’s role in the process. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.desmog.com/2021/07/09/exxon-tapes-american-petroleum-institutes-lobbying-oil-trains/">https://www.desmog.com/2021/07/09/exxon-tapes-american-petroleum-institutes-lobbying-oil-trains/</a><br>
- -<br>
[Chapter 4 of Follow the Money - download]<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.desmog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Chapter-4-Follow-The-Money.pdf">https://www.desmog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Chapter-4-Follow-The-Money.pdf</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[Media as information battleground]<br>
<b>A Fox News Climate Disinformation Channel Is the Last Thing We
Need</b><br>
The media giant is launching a 24-hour weather news channel.<br>
CHRIS D’ANGELO - July 9, 2021<br>
Americans have a big appetite for news about the weather, and
climate change is making weather events more frequent and extreme.
Now, Rupert Murdoch’s Fox Corporation, a media empire with a long
history of peddling climate disinformation, is entering the world of
24-hour weather coverage.<br>
<br>
The billionaire media mogul plans to launch Fox Weather later this
year, with the intent that it will rival the popular Weather
Channel. It has been poaching meteorologists from other networks,
The New York Times reported this week.<br>
<br>
Scientists and watchdog groups are understandably wary of the new
venture, anticipating that the network’s weather arm will prove just
as skewed, politicized, and detached from reality as its cable news
programming. Fox News commentators and their guests are constantly
downplaying and denying the global threat of climate change, even
amid historic and deadly heat waves, wildfires, hurricanes, and
drought...<br>
- -<br>
Just this week Milloy, a Fox contributor and former member of the
Trump administration’s Environmental Protection Agency transition
team, appeared on Ingraham’s show to discuss the ”war on air
conditioning” and bemoan smart electric meters and electric
vehicles.<br>
<br>
“Left uses climate change to control our lives,” read a chyron
during the segment.<br>
<br>
The new weather channel will be independent of Fox’s other networks,
and a spokesperson told the Times that its “dedicated team of
leading meteorologists and experts” will offer “in-depth reporting
surrounding all weather conditions.”<br>
<br>
John Morales, a meteorologist for NBC in Miami, is not as concerned
about the channel’s unique potential for climate denial.<br>
<br>
“Fox News weathercasters are reputable and some, like Maria Molina,
have gone on to accomplished careers in atmospheric research,” he
told HuffPost. “As science communicators, broadcast meteorologists
should seek not just to deliver weather forecasts and warnings but
to educate their audiences about our changing climate. Whether a Fox
weather network would frown on that is yet to be seen. If so, they
wouldn’t be the first news outlet failing to adequately cover the
climate crisis. There is huge room for improvement across the cable
and broadcast news spectrum.”<br>
<br>
The links between human-induced climate change and extreme weather
are undeniably clear. A study published Wednesday, for example,
concluded that last week’s grueling and deadly heat wave across the
Pacific Northwest and Canada would have been “virtually impossible”
without climate change.<br>
<br>
Ignoring, downplaying, or brushing off such connections would be a
dangerous disservice—and come at a time when the nation and planet
can least afford more disinformation and delay.<br>
<br>
“We know that communication is effective when it consists of simple,
clear messages repeated often by trusted sources. Fox News is
nothing if they’re not good at that,” Hassol said. “Surveys find
that Republicans trust Fox News more than any other major news
network. We know we have a partisan gap on climate change, and this
stands to only make that worse.”<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2021/07/a-fox-news-climate-disinformation-channel-is-the-last-thing-we-need/">https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2021/07/a-fox-news-climate-disinformation-channel-is-the-last-thing-we-need/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
[Why?]<br>
<b>Why are tornadoes spawned from hurricanes particularly dangerous?</b><br>
Tags: Tropical Storm Elsa, hurricanes, tropical storm<br>
Posted July 7, 2021 <br>
By Elizabeth Gardner, WRAL meteorologist<br>
<br>
Storms that move into North Carolina after a Gulf of Mexico or
Florida panhandle landfall have the potential to be particularly
devastating.<br>
<br>
Wind damage and flooding aren’t the only threats from hurricanes.
More than half of hurricanes also produce at least one tornado after
making landfall. In 2020, Hurricane Isaias spawned 12 tornadoes in
North Carolina. The strongest was an EF-3 in Bertie County that
killed two people.<br>
<br>
Sometimes, the United States sees 10% of its annual tornadoes in
just one tropical system.<br>
<br>
How do hurricanes and tropical storms spawn tornadoes?<br>
When a hurricane’s outer rain bands move onshore, the friction from
the land causes low-level winds to slow down – but the winds just
above the ground remain quite strong. This effect is called a "wind
shear." It causes a change in the wind speed – and sometimes
direction.<br>
<br>
When wind shear occurs, thunderstorms will begin to rotate, and
tornadoes can form.<br>
<br>
Keep in mind, sometimes the outer rain bands are hundreds of miles
away from the center of the storm, so tornadoes are possible even
when the center of circulation is well offshore.<br>
<br>
Why are tropical systems from the Gulf of Mexico particularly
dangerous?<br>
Storms that form in the Gulf of Mexico can bring tornadoes to North
Carolina. As the system moves northeast, areas east of the
circulation have a threat for tornadoes.<br>
<br>
Tornadoes within tropical systems are particularly dangerous because
they tend to form really fast – sometimes in only one or two
minutes.<br>
<br>
They also move at a rapid pace – as quickly as 50 to 60mph!<br>
<br>
However, they are usually short-lived, often just lasting a couple
of minutes.<br>
<br>
The fast development and movement make them fairly hard to track on
radar, so any time there is a tropical system nearby, be sure to
prepare for tornadoes, too.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.wral.com/why-are-tornadoes-spawned-from-hurricanes-particularly-dangerous/19761465/">https://www.wral.com/why-are-tornadoes-spawned-from-hurricanes-particularly-dangerous/19761465/</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
[DW 9 min video report]<br>
<b>'Records can be broken by several degrees' - What’s behind the
record shattering heat waves?</b><br>
Jul 8, 2021<br>
DW News<br>
Climate scientists have used models to confirm that burning fossil
fuels made the extreme heat wave in parts of the US and Canada
hotter and more likely.<br>
<br>
When a heat wave began to scorch Canada and the US in late June —
killing elderly people alone in their homes and fueling wildfires
that wiped out an entire village — scientists said burning fossil
fuels had changed the climate enough to make the temperature
extremes worse. Global warming made the hottest day of the North
American heat wave 150 times more likely and 2 degrees Celsius (3.6
Fahrenheit) hotter, according to a rapid attribution study released
Thursday by an international team of 27 scientists from the World
Weather Attribution initiative (WWA). Temperatures broke records in
Oregon and Washington, in the US, and in British Columbia, in
Canada. They reached a high of 49.6 C (121 F) that researchers say
would have been "virtually impossible" without climate change.<br>
<br>
The study, which has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed
journal, is the latest example of scientists using models to swiftly
assess the role of greenhouse gas emissions in exacerbating extreme
weather. Its findings dispel a myth prevalent in rich countries that
climate change only hurts people far away from them or in the
distant future. "We are entering uncharted territory," said study
co-author Sonia Seneviratne, from the Institute for Atmospheric and
Climate Science at ETH Zurich in Switzerland. "Much higher
temperature records will be reached if we don't manage to stop
greenhouse gas emissions and halt global warming."<br>
Previous heat records were "pulverized" by such large margins that
"something else must be going on," said Stefan Rahmstorf, head of
Earth System Analysis at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact
Research in Germany, who was not involved in the study. "The study
is valid and state of the art."<br>
<br>
Climate change has made heat waves hotter, longer and more common.
By burning fossil fuels — which release gases that trap the sun's
heat like a greenhouse — humans have warmed the planet by about 1.1
C above preindustrial levels. This raises the chance of
record-breaking temperatures.<br>
<br>
Lytton, a village in the Canadian province of British Columbia,
broke the country's heat record on July 2 when temperatures shot
almost 5 C above the previous record of 45 C.<br>
<br>
The next day it was destroyed by a wildfire.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b-ykVLQyCA">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b-ykVLQyCA</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
[no climate, no deal - do it before August]<br>
<b>WA Gov. Jay Inslee: 'You Can’t Run From Climate Change'</b><br>
Jul 3, 2021<br>
NowThis Earth<br>
‘You can’t run from climate change, you have to challenge it and
defeat it’ — Washington Gov. Jay Inslee says the record-breaking
Pacific Northwest heat wave shows just how unavoidable the climate
crisis really is.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3oKvCi-GjM">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3oKvCi-GjM</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
[new climate]<br>
<b>Most buildings were designed for an earlier climate – here’s what
will happen as global warming accelerates</b><br>
July 2, 2021 <br>
Climate change will affect every aspect of our lives – including the
buildings we live and work in. Most people in the US, for example,
spend about 90% of their time indoors. Climate change is
fundamentally altering the environmental conditions in which these
buildings are designed to function.<br>
<br>
Architects and engineers design buildings and other structures, like
bridges, to operate within the parameters of the local climate.
They’re built using materials and following design standards that
can withstand the range of temperatures, rainfall, snow and wind
that are expected, plus any geological issues such as earthquakes,
subsidence and ground water levels.<br>
<br>
When any of those parameters are exceeded, chances are some aspect
of the building will fail. If there are high winds, some roof tiles
may be ripped off. If, after days of heavy rain, the water table
rises, the basement might flood. This is normal, and these problems
cannot be designed out entirely. After the event has passed, the
damage can be repaired and additional measures can reduce the risk
of it happening again.<br>
<br>
But climate change will breed conditions where these parameters are
exceeded more often and to a far greater degree. Some changes, like
higher average air temperatures and humidity, will become permanent.
What were previously considered once in a century floods may become
a regular occurrence.<br>
<br>
Some of these impacts are fairly obvious. Houses will be more prone
to overheating, putting the lives of residents at risk, which is
what has happened during the recent “heat dome” over North America.
Flooding will happen more often and inundate greater areas, to the
point that some places might have to be abandoned. The village of
Fairbourne in Wales has already been identified as a likely
candidate. Failure to act on both of these threats in the UK was
highlighted in a recent report by the Climate Change Committee.<br>
<br>
To some extent, these impacts will be localised and containable,
with fairly simple remedies. For example, overheating can be reduced
by shading windows with awnings or blinds, good insulation, and
ample ventilation. Perhaps more worrying are the insidious effects
of climate change which gradually undermine the core functions of a
building in less obvious ways.<br>
<br>
<b>Termites and melting asphalt</b><br>
More intense wind and rain will cause external cladding to
deteriorate more rapidly and leak more often. Higher temperatures
will expand the regions where some insects can live. That includes
timber-eating termites that can cause major structural damage, or
malaria-carrying mosquitoes which living spaces must be redesigned
to protect us from.<br>
<br>
A wooden window frame being decomposed by termites.<br>
Termite damage on a wooden window frame. Attapon Thana/Shutterstock<br>
Materials expand as they get hotter, especially metals, which can
cause them to buckle once their designed tolerance is exceeded. For
one skyscraper in Shenzhen, China, high temperatures were partially
blamed for causing the structure to shake, forcing its evacuation,
as the steel frame stretched in the heat. Extreme temperatures can
even cause materials to melt, resulting in roads “bleeding” as the
surface layer of bitumen softens.<br>
<br>
Subsidence – when the ground below a structure gives way, causing it
to crack or collapse – is also expected to happen more often in a
warmer world. Buildings with foundations in clay soils are
particularly vulnerable, as the soils swell when they absorb water,
then harden and shrink as they dry out. Changing rainfall patterns
will exacerbate this. Over the next 50 years, for example, more than
10% of properties in Britain will be affected by subsidence.<br>
<b><br>
</b><b>Concrete cancer</b><br>
Perhaps the biggest concern is how climate change will affect
reinforced concrete, one of the most widely used materials on Earth.
Used in everything from skyscrapers and bridges to the lintels above
windows in homes, reinforced concrete is made by placing steel rods
within a mould and pouring wet concrete in. Once dry, this produces
incredibly strong structures.<br>
<br>
But a warmer wetter climate will play havoc with the durability of
this material. When the steel inside the concrete gets wet it rusts
and expands, cracking the concrete and weakening the structure in a
process sometimes referred to as “concrete cancer”.<br>
<br>
Buildings in coastal areas are especially susceptible as the
chloride in salt water accelerates rusting. Rising sea levels will
raise the water table and make it saltier, affecting building
foundations, while salt-spray will spread further on stronger winds.<br>
<br>
At the same time, the concrete is affected by carbonation, a process
where carbon dioxide from the air reacts with the cement to form a
different chemical element, calcium carbonate. This lowers the pH of
the concrete, making the steel even more prone to corrosion. Since
the 1950s, global CO₂ levels have increased from about 300 parts per
million in the atmosphere to well over 400. More CO₂ means more
carbonation.<br>
<br>
The tragic recent collapse of an apartment building in Miami in the
US may be an early warning of this process gaining speed. While the
exact cause of the collapse is still being investigated, some are
suggesting it might be linked to climate change.<br>
<br>
The local mayor, Charles Burkett, summed up the bewilderment many
felt:<br>
<br>
It just doesn’t happen. You don’t see buildings falling down in
America.<br>
<br>
Whether or not the link to climate change proves to be true, it is
nevertheless a wake up call to the fragility of our buildings. It
should also be seen as a clear demonstration of a critical point:
wealth does not protect against the effects of climate change. Rich
nations have the financial clout to adapt more rapidly and to
mitigate these impacts, but they can’t stop them at the border.
Climate change is indiscriminate. Buildings are vulnerable to these
impacts no matter where in the world they are, and if anything, the
modern buildings of developed countries have more things in them
that can go wrong than simpler traditional structures.<br>
<br>
The only option is to begin adapting buildings to meet the changing
parameters in which they are operating. The sooner we begin
retrofitting existing buildings and constructing new ones that can
withstand climate change, the better.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://theconversation.com/most-buildings-were-designed-for-an-earlier-climate-heres-what-will-happen-as-global-warming-accelerates-163672">https://theconversation.com/most-buildings-were-designed-for-an-earlier-climate-heres-what-will-happen-as-global-warming-accelerates-163672</a><br>
<p> </p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<br>
[The news archive - looking back]<br>
<font size="+1"><b>On this day in the history of global warming July
10, 2007</b></font><br>
July 10, 2007: On MSNBC's "Countdown with Keith Olbermann," Air
America host Rachel Maddow points out the mainstream media's fetish
for false balance, specifically citing climate coverage.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://youtu.be/vcMFwuu_UlA">http://youtu.be/vcMFwuu_UlA</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/</p>
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html"
moz-do-not-send="true"><https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html></a>
/<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a><br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"
moz-do-not-send="true"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
- Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a hobby production curated by Richard
Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote" moz-do-not-send="true">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote" moz-do-not-send="true"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://TheClimate.Vote</a> <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"
moz-do-not-send="true"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>