<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+2"><i><b>December 14, 2021</b></i></font><br>
<br>
<i>[ destabilized weather meets unstable politics - assorted ABC
videos ]</i><br>
<i> </i><b>Sen. Rand Paul's aid request for tornado damage faces
backlash</b><br>
The lawmaker has opposed federal disaster aid for other states.<br>
December 13, 2021,<br>
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul is facing criticism for requesting federal
aid for his home state despite his long track record of opposing aid
for other regions recovering from disasters.<br>
<br>
Kentucky was one of several Midwestern states rocked by tornadoes
over the weekend. The storms decimated large portions of towns, and
as many as 70 people are believed to have been killed in Western
Kentucky...<br>
- -<br>
Paul, a Republican, shared a photo of a letter he sent to the Biden
administration requesting "expeditious approval" of a request for
federal aid made by Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear. Requests like these
by senators in states affected by a natural disaster are quite
common, but Paul is facing blowback because he has opposed federal
disaster relief for several affected regions throughout his Senate
career.<br>
<br>
Paul is a deficit hawk, who has battled against hikes to the federal
deficit to fund all sorts of legislation. His opposition to aid for
states impacted by disaster has often been based in his belief that
disaster expenses should be offset by cuts elsewhere in the federal
budget...<br>
- -<br>
Biden has already pledged to help Kentucky and other impacted states
recover from the tragedy...<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sen-rand-pauls-aid-request-tornado-damage-faces/story?id=81730941">https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sen-rand-pauls-aid-request-tornado-damage-faces/story?id=81730941</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ oops, UN fails again - video report ] </i><br>
<b>United Nations Security Council fails to adopt a resolution on
climate & security | English News</b><br>
Dec 13, 2021<br>
WION<br>
In a big setback, United Nations Security Council failed to adopt
first its kind resolution on climate and security. Russia vetoed the
resolution.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blcYSjY-Px8">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blcYSjY-Px8</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ positive news - 11 min video report ]</i><br>
<b>Artificial starch from CO2. Ground breaking new tech could reduce
land and water use by 90%.</b><br>
Dec 12, 2021<br>
Just Have a Think<br>
The climate impacts of our global agriculture system have been very
much in the news recently, especially when it comes to red meat. But
one aspect of the industry that is much less conspicuous is the
production of starch from crops like corn. Millions of tons of
starch are used every year for a growing number of applications in
many sectors, and the volumes are increasing every year. Now a
Chinese research group has perfected a system to manufacture
synthetic starch, potentially saving huge swathes of land and water
use.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2SsheLN1t8">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2SsheLN1t8</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Dave Roberts leads a superb discussion on media tactics ]</i><br>
<b>Discussing disinformation and media with Matt Sheffield</b><br>
How right-wing media polluted the information environment.<br>
David Roberts<br>
Matt Sheffield started his first conservative media website, bashing
news anchor Dan Rather for liberal bias, way back in 2000, and in
subsequent years became a key figure in right-wing media criticism.<br>
<br>
But the rise of Trump left him disillusioned and he has since become
a prominent critic of right-wing media. He now runs a site called
Flux dedicated to accurate, inclusive journalism.<br>
Last week, Matt and I got together on one of these live Twitter
Spaces things — a glorified conference call, basically, to which
people can tune in and ask questions — and had a wide-ranging
conversation about the disinformation crisis, how it manifested in
climate change, and what can be done about it.<br>
<br>
The audio was archived, available exclusively to Flux and Volts
subscribers. I hope you enjoy it..<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.volts.wtf/p/discussing-disinformation-and-media">https://www.volts.wtf/p/discussing-disinformation-and-media</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
[ from the NYTimes ]<br>
<b>A former right-wing media creator on how a ‘different reality’
became so prominent.</b><br>
Nov. 16, 2020 -By Adam Satariano<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/16/technology/a-former-right-wing-media-creator-on-how-a-different-reality-became-so-prominent.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/16/technology/a-former-right-wing-media-creator-on-how-a-different-reality-became-so-prominent.html</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
<i>[ new website setup by former disinformationist ]</i><br>
<b>Together, we’re building the next generation of media</b><br>
MATTHEW SHEFFIELD February 24, 2021<br>
Overcoming the deep-rooted cynicism that our media and political
environments have created is going to be incredibly difficult.
That’s why Flux is being built on a community-based model. We want
to create great articles, videos, and podcasts, but we want to
empower you as well. Conventional journalism continues to ignore
women’s voices, racial and sexual minorities, lower-income citizens,
and everyone who lives outside the Boston-to-DC corridor. We also
strive continually to encourage critical thinking and to encourage
everyone to fight for pluralism, the most important piece of a
strong society.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://flux.community/">https://flux.community/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ long report -- using email to deliver disinformation - clips
from the NYTimes ] </i><br>
<b>Now in Your Inbox: Political Misinformation</b><br>
One of the most powerful communication tools available to
politicians teems with unfounded claims and largely escapes notice.<br>
Maggie Astor<br>
By Maggie Astor<br>
Dec. 13, 2021<br>
A few weeks ago, Representative Dan Crenshaw, a Texas Republican,
falsely claimed that the centerpiece of President Biden’s domestic
agenda, a $1.75 trillion bill to battle climate change and extend
the nation’s social safety net, would include Medicare for all.<br>
<br>
It doesn’t, and never has. But few noticed Mr. Crenshaw’s lie
because he didn’t say it on Facebook, or on Fox News. Instead, he
sent the false message directly to the inboxes of his constituents
and supporters in a fund-raising email.<br>
<br>
Lawmakers’ statements on social media and cable news are now
routinely fact-checked and scrutinized. But email — one of the most
powerful communication tools available to politicians, reaching up
to hundreds of thousands of people — teems with unfounded claims and
largely escapes notice.<br>
<br>
The New York Times signed up in August for the campaign lists of the
390 senators and representatives running for re-election in 2022
whose websites offered that option, and read more than 2,500 emails
from those campaigns to track how widely false and misleading
statements were being used to help fill political coffers.<br>
<br>
Both parties delivered heaps of hyperbole in their emails. One
Republican, for instance, declared that Democrats wanted to
establish a “one-party socialist state,” while a Democrat suggested
that the party’s Jan. 6 inquiry was at imminent risk because the
G.O.P. “could force the whole investigation to end early.”<br>
<br>
But Republicans included misinformation far more often: in about 15
percent of their messages, compared with about 2 percent for
Democrats. In addition, multiple Republicans often spread the same
unfounded claims, whereas Democrats rarely repeated one another’s.<br>
<br>
At least eight Republican lawmakers sent fund-raising emails
containing a brazen distortion of a potential settlement with
migrants separated from their families during the Trump
administration. One of them, Senator John Kennedy, Republican of
Louisiana, falsely claimed that President Biden was “giving every
illegal immigrant that comes into our country $450,000.”<br>
<br>
Those claims were grounded in news that the Justice Department was
negotiating payments to settle lawsuits filed on behalf of immigrant
families whom the Trump administration had separated, some of whom
have not been reunited. But the payments, which are not final and
could end up being smaller, would be limited to that small fraction
of migrants.<br>
<br>
The relatively small number of false statements from Democrats were
mostly about abortion. For instance, an email from Representative
Carolyn Maloney of New York said the Mississippi law before the
Supreme Court was “nearly identical to the one in Texas, banning
abortions after 6 weeks,” but Mississippi’s law bans abortion after
15 weeks and does not include the vigilante enforcement mechanism
that is a defining characteristic of Texas’ law.<br>
<br>
A spokeswoman for Ms. Maloney called the inaccuracy an “honest
mistake” and said the campaign would check future emails more
carefully.<br>
<br>
Campaign representatives for Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Crenshaw did not
respond to multiple requests for comment. The Republican House and
Senate campaign committees also did not respond to a request for
comment.<br>
<br>
Politicians have exaggerated and dissembled since time immemorial,
including in their email dispatches. But the volume, the baldness
and the reach of the false claims have increased.<br>
<br>
The emails reviewed by The Times illuminate how ubiquitous
misinformation has become among Republicans, fueled in large part by
former President Donald J. Trump. And the misinformation is not
coming only, or even primarily, from the handful who get national
attention for it.<br>
<br>
The people behind campaign emails have “realized the more extreme
the claim, the better the response,” said Frank Luntz, a Republican
pollster. “The more that it elicits red-hot anger, the more likely
people donate. And it just contributes to the perversion of our
democratic process. It contributes to the incivility and indecency
of political behavior.”<br>
<br>
The messages also underscore how, for all the efforts to compel
platforms like Facebook and Twitter to address falsehoods, many of
the same claims are flowing through other powerful channels with
little notice.<br>
<br>
For fact checkers and other watchdogs, “it’s hard to know what it is
that politicians are saying directly to individual supporters in
their inboxes,” said Jennifer Stromer-Galley, a professor in the
School of Information Studies at Syracuse University.<br>
<br>
“And politicians know that,” she said. “Politicians and the
consulting firms behind them, they know that this kind of messaging
is not monitored to the same extent, so they can be more carefree
with what they’re saying.”<br>
<br>
Email is a crucial tool in political fund-raising because it costs
campaigns almost nothing and can be extremely effective: When
campaigns invest in it, it routinely accounts for a majority of
their online fund-raising. Supporters are bombarded — sometimes
daily — with messages meant to make them angry, because strategists
know anger motivates voters.<br>
<br>
In many cases, candidates used anger-inducing misinformation
directly in their requests for a donation. For instance, after his
false claim about payments to immigrants, Mr. Kennedy — who began
the email by declaring himself “mad as a murder hornet” — included a
link labeled “RUSH $500 TO STOP ILLEGAL PAYMENTS!”<br>
<br>
“I’m watching Joe Biden pay illegals to come into our country, and
it’s all being paid for by raising YOUR taxes,” he wrote. “We can’t
let Biden pass out hundreds of thousands of dollars to every Tom,
Dick and Harry that wants to come into our country illegally.”<br>
<br>
Several other Republicans, including Representative Vern Buchanan of
Florida, also claimed that the payments would go to all undocumented
immigrants. Others, including Senator Todd Young of Indiana, tucked
the context inside emails with misleading subject lines such as
“BREAKING: Biden wants to pay illegal immigrants $450,000 each for
breaking our laws.”<br>
<br>
Of 28 emails that included the $450,000 figure, only eight
contextualized it accurately.<br>
<br>
Campaign representatives for Mr. Buchanan and Mr. Young did not
respond to requests for comment.<br>
<br>
Another common line was that the Justice Department was targeting
parents as “domestic terrorists” for challenging the teaching of
critical race theory, an advanced academic framework that
conservatives are using as shorthand for how some curriculums cover
race and racism — or, alternatively, for challenging
pandemic-related restrictions.<br>
<br>
“Parents are simply protesting a radical curriculum in public
schools, and Biden wants the parents labeled terrorists,” read an
email from Representative Jake LaTurner of Kansas. “Will you
consider donating now to help us fight back against this disgusting
abuse of power?”<br>
<br>
This misinformation — echoed in emails from Mr. Crenshaw, Mr.
Kennedy, Mr. Young, Representative Jim Hagedorn of Minnesota and
Representative Elise Stefanik of New York — emerged after Attorney
General Merrick Garland sent a memorandum on Oct. 4 directing the
F.B.I. to address threats against school personnel and school board
members. (Some opponents of curriculums and pandemic protocols have
sent death threats, vandalized homes and otherwise acted
menacingly.) The memo explicitly distinguished between dissent and
threats, and did not call anyone a domestic terrorist. The
Republican narrative conflates it with a letter the National School
Boards Association, an independent group, sent to the Justice
Department a few days earlier.<br>
<br>
Representatives for Ms. Stefanik and Mr. Hagedorn said the
association had “coordinated” with the Biden administration on the
letter, citing recent news reports. Those reports say the school
boards association discussed the letter with the administration and,
at the administration’s request, added details about the threats;
they do not show the Justice Department endorsing the “terrorist”
label or criminalizing nonviolent opposition to curriculums.<br>
<br>
Campaign representatives for Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. LaTurner
and Mr. Young did not respond to requests for comment.<br>
<br>
Combating misinformation in emails is difficult both because of the
private nature of the medium and because its targets are predisposed
to believe it — though Emily Thorson, a political scientist at
Syracuse, noted that the fact that the recipients were likely to
already be staunch partisans reduced the chances of misinformation
reaching people whose views would be changed by it.<br>
<br>
Professor Thorson said what concerned her more was that — unlike
much of the misinformation on social media — these claims came from
people with authority and were being spread repetitively. That is
how lies that the 2020 election was rigged gained traction: not
“because of random videos on Facebook but because it was a coherent
message echoed by a lot of elites,” she said. “Those are the ones
that we need to be most worried about.”<br>
<br>
Mr. Luntz, the Republican pollster, runs frequent focus groups with
voters and said they tended to accept misinformation uncritically.<br>
<br>
“It may be a fund-raising pitch, but very often people look at it as
a campaign pitch,” he said. “They think of it as context, they think
of it as information — they don’t necessarily see this as
fund-raising, even though that’s what it is. And so misleading them
in an attempt to divide them from their money is pure evil, because
you’re taking advantage of people who just don’t know the
difference.”<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/13/us/politics/email-political-misinformation.html">https://www.nytimes..com/2021/12/13/us/politics/email-political-misinformation.html</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ another review - video 30 min ]</i><br>
<b>DON'T LOOK UP MOVIE REVIEW 2021 | Double Toasted</b><br>
Dec 9, 2021<br>
Double Toasted<br>
DON'T LOOK UP MOVIE REVIEW 2021 | Double Toasted - Today at Double
Toasted we have our Don’t Look Up review. In this funny video, we
take a look at the Don’t Look Up trailer before going in-depth into
our Don’t Look Up movie review. We discuss all the performances,
along with showing you the Don’t Look Up Ariana grande scene, and
discussing her performance. We also touch on the Don’t Look Up
ending scene and the Don’t Look Up credits which you should stick
around for. What did you think about Don’t Look Up? Let us know in
the comment section below.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlPPTTVtra8">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlPPTTVtra8</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Nick Breeze interviews ] </i><br>
<b>Prof. Peter Wadhams | Can we remove billions of tonnes of CO2?
And methane?</b><br>
Dec 8, 2021<br>
Nick Breeze ClimateGenn<br>
In this ClimateGenn episode, I am speaking to professor Peter
Wadhams from the University of Cambridge about his recent research
for a book he is writing on the viability of greenhouse gas removal
from the atmosphere.<br>
<br>
Some of these are also referred to as negative emissions
technologies, or ‘nets’ and are widely included in national
emissions reduction plans despite none being proven at scale today.<br>
<br>
We discuss the viability of various proposed techniques including
tree planting, bioenergy capture and storage as well as direct air
capture and ocean proposals including farming kelp and the use of
diatoms for large-scale sequestration.<br>
<br>
In the last segment we discuss the risks posed by Arctic methane
releases and two proposed techniques for dealing with a potential
methane emergency, whereby multiple billions of tonnes of the
potent greenhouse gas are released at once. <br>
<br>
These are controversial proposals despite policymakers assuming they
will work in the future. The danger of these suppositions is
compounded by the fact that many research projects are embryonic and
underfunded. <br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMTElDc6fg0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMTElDc6fg0</a>
<p><i><br>
</i></p>
<p><i><br>
</i></p>
<i>[ Thwaits glacier is well studied, but new discoveries move the
predictions ] </i><br>
<b>Ice shelf holding back keystone Antarctic glacier within years of
failure</b><br>
Breakup of the Thwaites eastern shelf will ramp up sea level rise<br>
13 DEC 2021 - PAUL VOOSEN<br>
An alarming crackup has begun at the foot of Antarctica’s vulnerable
Thwaites Glacier, whose meltwater is already responsible for about
4% of global sea level rise. An ice sheet the size of Florida,
Thwaites ends its slide into the ocean as a floating ledge of ice 45
kilometers wide. But now, this ice shelf, riven by newly detected
fissures on its surface and underside, is likely to break apart in
the next 5 years or so, scientists reported today at a meeting of
the American Geophysical Union.<br>
<br>
The most dramatic sign of impending failure is a set of diagonal
fractures that nearly span the entire shelf. Last month, satellites
spotted accelerating movement of ice along the fractures, says Erin
Pettit, a glaciologist at Oregon State University, Corvallis, who is
part of a multiyear expedition studying the glacier. The shelf is a
bit like a windshield with a series of slowly opening cracks, she
says. “You’re like, I should get a new windshield. And one day,
bang—there are a million other cracks there.”...<br>
- -<br>
The newest wrinkle is the growth of the diagonal fractures, which
stretch more than 40 kilometers from the grounding line all the way
to the offshore mountain. Although the ice directly behind the
mountain still seems stuck, GPS stations placed during the first
field season show slippage along the fracture zone is allowing other
ice to maneuver around the mountain, which is likely to speed up the
crack up. “It’s got enough freedom now that it can reroute itself
around,” Pettit says.<br>
<br>
With several seasons left in the ITGC campaign, researchers will be
able to watch as the shelf disintegrates—and they’ll have to
retrieve their instruments before the ice cracks, with several
fissures only 3 kilometers away from their former campsite. The ice
shelf failure will be a warning that Thwaites, and the rest of the
West Antarctic Ice Sheet, could begin to see significant losses
within decades, especially if carbon emissions don’t start to come
down, Pettit says. “We’ll start to see some of that before I leave
this Earth.”<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.science.org/content/article/ice-shelf-holding-back-keystone-antarctic-glacier-within-years-failure">https://www.science.org/content/article/ice-shelf-holding-back-keystone-antarctic-glacier-within-years-failure</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
[ AGU presentation ]<br>
<b>C34A-07 - Collapse of Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf by intersecting
fractures. (Invited)</b><br>
Wednesday, 15 December 2021<br>
[graphics] -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://agu.confex.com/data/abstract/agu/fm21/2/6/Paper_978762_abstract_922569_0.png">https://agu.confex.com/data/abstract/agu/fm21/2/6/Paper_978762_abstract_922569_0.png</a><br>
<b>Abstract</b><br>
<blockquote>The Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf (TEIS) buttresses one
third of Thwaites Glacier. Removal of TEIS has the potential to
increase the contribution of Thwaites Glacier to sea level rise by
up to 25\%. Recent research shows that the ice shelf is losing its
grip on a submarine shoal that acts as a pinning point and the
shear margin that separates TEIS from the Thwaites Glacier Tongue
has extended, further weakening the TEIS connection to the pinning
point. A sequence of Sentinel-1 radar imagery shows that parallel
wing and comb cracks have recently formed rifts at high angles to
the main shear margin and are propagating into the central part of
the ice shelf at rates as high as 2km per year. We use satellite
data, ground-penetrating radar, and GPS measurements to suggest
that final collapse of Thwaites Glacier’s last remaining ice shelf
may be initiated by intersection of rifts with hidden basal
crevasse zones within as little as 5 years.<br>
<p>The central part of TEIS has no obvious surface crevasses and
smooth surface topography, except for the surface expression of
a pronounced basal channel aligned parallel to ice flow. Despite
this smooth surface, ground-penetrating radar shows a weak zone
of thin ice and complex basal topography, including numerous
basal crevasses, that is not in local hydrostatic equilibrium.
This local disequilibrium suggests the presence of elevated
vertical shear stresses that further weaken this critical part
of the ice shelf. GPS stake network observations show no
measurable regional strain in the horizontal plane because
large-scale flow is being accommodated by the lateral shear
margin.</p>
<p>In the near future, the propagating rifts are likely to
intersect this weak zone, triggering rifting along the basal
crevasses and, subsequently, along the basal channel and a into
secondary set of basal crevasses on the eastern side of the
basal channel. This ``zigzag’’ rift sequence would disconnect
the main flow from the influence of the pinning point (and
compressive arches) and will ultimately lead to a complete
disintegration of the ice shelf.<b><br>
</b></p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Plain-language Summary</b></p>
<blockquote>The Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf is the floating terminus
of the Thwaites Glacier, one of the fastest changing glaciers in
Antarctica and contributing as much as 4\% of global sea level
rise today. This floating ice shelf is stabilized offshore by a
marine shoal and acts as a dam to slow the flow of ice off the
continent into the ocean. If this floating ice shelf breaks apart,
the Thwaites Glacier will accelerate and its contribution to sea
level rise will increase by as much as 25\%. Over the last several
years, satellite radar imagery shows many new fractures opening
up. Similar to a growing crack in the windshield of a car, a
slowly growing crack means the windshield is weak and a small bump
to the car might cause the windshield to suddenly break apart into
hundreds of panes of glass. We have mapped out weaker and stronger
areas of the ice shelf and suggest a “zig-zag” pathway the
fractures might take through the ice, ultimately leading to break
up of the shelf in as little as 5 years, which result in more ice
flowing off the continent.<br>
</blockquote>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm21/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/978762">https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm21/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/978762</a><br>
<p><i><br>
</i> </p>
<i> </i><br>
<i>[The news archive - looking back at older information
measurements ]</i><br>
<font size="+1"><b>On this day in the history of global warming
December 14, 2006</b></font><br>
<br>
Frank Luntz--the author of an infamous 1990s memo encouraging
Republicans to place rhetorical emphasis on alleged uncertainties in
climate science--appears on the Fox News Channel and declares that
according to his own polling, Americans want action on climate
change. <br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://youtu.be/PXoB3xCSgi8">http://youtu.be/PXoB3xCSgi8</a> <br>
<p>/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
</p>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html"
moz-do-not-send="true"><https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html></a>
/<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a><br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"
moz-do-not-send="true"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a hobby production curated by Richard
Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">contact@theclimate.vote</a> <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote" moz-do-not-send="true"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://TheClimate.Vote</a> <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"
moz-do-not-send="true"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>