<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="+2"><i><b>March 28, 2022</b></i></font><br>
</p>
<i>[ Fire at the National Center for Atmospheric Research -- fire
is named NCAR ] </i><br>
<b>NCAR wildfire prompts evacuations near Boulder, Colorado</b><br>
March 27, 2022 NCAR wildfire prompts evacuations near Boulder,
Colorado<br>
The fire has burned 189 acres south of the Mesa Laboratory of the
National Center for Atmospheric Research, on the southwest side of
the city<br>
<br>
The NCAR Fire that started at about 2:08 Saturday afternoon on the
southwest edge of Boulder, Colorado initially required the
evacuation of 19,000 people and 8,000 homes. By early Sunday morning
the blaze had slowed and the evacuation area had been reduced,
affecting 1,629 people and 699 housing units. The fire was mapped
Sunday morning at 189 acres. They are calling it 21 percent
contained.<br>
Regarding the status of the fire, Incident Commander Mike Smith of
Boulder Fire Rescue said Sunday morning, “I think right now we’re in
a good position. The wind speeds are nothing like they were during
the Marshall Fire, we’ve got a lot of good resources in place, we
have full structure protection groups as well as assets up on the
hill. I think as long as the weather does what it is supposed to do
today and tomorrow we’re gonna be in good shape.”<br>
The fire came within 1,000 yards of homes on the southwest side of
Boulder, but no structures have been destroyed. The incident is near
the Mesa Laboratory of the National Center for Atmospheric Research
(NCAR).<br>
<br>
The Marshall Fire, pushed by winds gusting at 60 to 100 mph, on
December 30 spread rapidly as it destroyed more than 1,000 homes.
Most were in the city of Louisville and the town of Superior. It
started about 4 miles southeast of the NCAR Fire.<br>
Mr. Smith said there have been no injuries. The cause is under
investigation but the area of origin has been identified as being on
the northwest side of the fire in the Bear Canyon/Bear Creek area.<br>
Resources available on the fire Sunday will include 110 personnel, 2
fixed wing air tankers, and one helicopter. Initially on Saturday
over 200 firefighters from about 30 agencies responded.<br>
<br>
The plan for today is to reinforce the fire line and “corral the
fire up into the rocks and snow”, Mr. Smith said. The evacuation
areas will be reevaluated today.<br>
<br>
“Good planning, good prep, and a lot of good mitigation work are the
reasons why we had good success today,” said Incident Commander Mike
Smith. “The forecast today is for north and northwest winds which is
a little less favorable [than in an earlier prediction] but the wind
speeds are not that high, 15 maximum to 20. We have the plan in
place to create more evacuations [if necessary], our hope is that we
don’t have to do any of those.”<br>
Some nearby water reservoirs were frozen and were not available for
firefighting helicopters as a source of water, according to
@mitchellbyars, a reporter with the Daily Camera.<br>
<br>
The forecast for Monday in the fire area is for 80 degrees, very low
humidity dropping to 10 percent, and light winds ranging from 5 to
12 mph out of the southwest.<br>
The intensity of this fire in a few places was pretty high, Mr.
Smith said, but for the most part it was a pretty low intensity
fire. He was also the Incident Commander on the Marshall Fire.<br>
<br>
“Between aggressive initial attack and having the aviation assets,
the single engine air tankers being able to put some retardant down
in between the homes was a real benefit,” said Mr. Smith.<br>
<br>
On the Marshall Fire strong winds prevented aircraft from dropping
water or retardant as homes were burning.<br>
<br>
When asked by a reporter, “It’s been a long year — how are you
feeling?” Mr. Smith replied, “It’s March but it feels like it’s
November. No, we’re doing good. We’re nervous about the season
coming up. When you look at the long term forecast for the upcoming
season I think this is just a sign of the way things are going to
go…We only have 365 fire days a year,” he said with a smile.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wildfiretoday.com/2022/03/27/ncar-wildfire-prompts-evacuations-near-boulder-colorado/">https://wildfiretoday.com/2022/03/27/ncar-wildfire-prompts-evacuations-near-boulder-colorado/</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<i>[ Higher education ] </i><br>
<b>Stanford transitions to 100 percent renewable electricity as
second solar plant goes online</b><br>
Stanford completes the university’s transition to 100 percent
renewable electricity as Solar Generating Station #2 begins
commercial operation.<br>
BY CHELCEY ADAMI - - MARCH 24, 2022<br>
<br>
Stanford’s second solar generating plant went online this month,
completing the university’s years-long transition to 100 percent
renewable electricity and marking a major milestone in its larger
journey to reach net zero carbon emissions on campus.<br>
<br>
Stanford Solar Generating Station #2 (SSGS2), Stanford’s portion of
a larger solar and energy storage project called Slate, began
commercial operation in mid-March. (Image credit: Goldman Sachs
Renewable Energy)<br>
<br>
Stanford Solar Generating Station #2 (SSGS2), Stanford’s portion of
a larger solar and energy storage project called Slate, began
commercial operation in mid-March. The 63-megawatt solar
photovoltaic plant sits on approximately 420 acres in Central
California, near Lemoore.<br>
<br>
The station serves as the final component in the Stanford Energy
System Innovations (SESI), a complete redesign and transition of
Stanford University’s energy system from a 100 percent fossil
fuel-based, combined heat and power plant to grid-sourced
electricity and a more efficient electric heat recovery system.<br>
“As this new solar plant comes online, Stanford will achieve the
important milestone of producing enough renewable electricity to
exceed what the university consumes,” said President Marc
Tessier-Lavigne. “But our work to achieve a more sustainable future
is only beginning.<br>
<br>
“As we make our operations greener, we’re also committed to
advancing global solutions through our mission of research and
education,” he added. “Our new school focused on climate and
sustainability, which opens its doors this fall, will serve as a
focal point for these efforts.”<br>
<br>
SSGS2 includes a 200-megawatt battery energy storage system that
helps create a better match between demand (such as nighttime use of
electricity) and resource (electricity generated during the
daytime). Excess energy generated from the plant will help
sustainably support California’s electric grid, said Aurora
Winslade, director of Stanford’s Office of Sustainability.<br>
<br>
Recurrent Energy, a wholly owned subsidiary of Canadian Solar,
developed and operates the facility. Goldman Sachs Renewable Power
purchased it from Recurrent, which now serves as project manager.<br>
<br>
Stanford is an “offtaker,” or buyer, of the facility’s energy, along
with Bay Area Rapid Transit, Silicon Valley Clean Energy, Central
Coast Community Energy and the Power and Water Resources Pooling
Authority.<br>
<b><br>
</b><b>Ambitious decarbonization</b><br>
In 2015, Stanford transitioned from powering the campus solely
through natural gas to a more efficient system of using grid-sourced
electricity and waste heat to heat and cool the campus – saving
money, conserving water, eliminating greenhouse gases and paving the
way for a clean energy future. To do so, the ground-breaking Central
Energy Facility was brought online, and Stanford’s on-campus natural
gas-fired cogeneration plant was decommissioned...<br>
The 54-megawatt Stanford Solar Generating Station #1 in Rosamond,
California, came online in 2016.<br>
<br>
Now that SSGS2 is also online, Stanford can work toward its goal to
power everything with clean electricity – from cooking operations in
dining halls to burners in labs – on the main campus, the Redwood
City campus and the Hopkins Marine Station in Pacific Grove.<br>
<br>
The university’s sophisticated greenhouse gas reduction programs
have resulted in nearly 80 percent reduction from peak levels in
2011.<br>
<br>
“Stanford is among the first universities in the world to do this
specific combination of heat recovery, large-scale thermal storage,
renewable electrification and optimization in the way that we are
doing it,” Winslade said. “That makes us one of the most advanced
universities in the world when it comes to operationalizing these
kinds of ambitious decarbonization greenhouse gas reduction and
climate action targets.”<br>
<br>
This model is also a good economic investment, saving money over the
long run, she added. The university forecasts a total net savings of
about $520 million in energy savings, when compared to 2011 costs.<br>
<br>
“Both higher education institutions as well as other entities are
looking for ways to procure clean energy,” Winslade said. “This
demonstrates how it can be done at an affordable cost, to be able to
procure renewable energy in a long-term partnership and contribute
to the production of more clean energy into the grid.”<br>
<b><br>
</b><b>Life on Earth</b><br>
This decarbonization journey is part of how Stanford is addressing
the urgency of climate and sustainability challenges and working
toward creating a future where humans and nature thrive, said
Lincoln Bleveans, executive director of sustainability and energy
management, who spoke at the ribbon-cutting ceremony for SSGS2 on
March 15.<br>
<br>
“We are focused on real-world change, both to make Stanford itself
as sustainable as possible and to inspire other campuses, cities and
businesses around the world with a proven, cost-effective
decarbonization model,” he said. “We are a ‘living lab’ for
sustainability solutions.”<br>
<br>
There have been more than 5,000 tours of Stanford’s Central Energy
facility as interested parties learn more about how to implement the
technology; visitors have included tribal nation leaders, the U.S.
military, dignitaries from other countries and leaders in higher
education.<br>
<br>
“Through our research and operations, Stanford is working to address
the most urgent issue of our times: sustaining life on Earth,” said
Provost Persis Drell. “We have long-standing expertise in
environmental studies and continue to increase our investments in
sustainability research and education. We also strive to live our
values by running our campus as cleanly and efficiently as
possible.”<br>
<br>
Before the addition of SSGS2, Stanford was already a top-ten
purchaser of renewable energy in U.S. higher education.<br>
<br>
Going forward, Stanford plans to complete its electrification of the
remaining campus shuttle buses and campus vehicles; conversion of
hospitals to hot water and electrification of hot water processes;
and electrification of natural gas and steam appliances and heating.<br>
<br>
To reach net-zero carbon emissions, every member of the Stanford
community will ultimately need to participate as the university
tackles Scope 3 emissions, which include things like air travel,
commuting and the purchase of goods such as pens, paper and bags,
Winslade said. The university aims to eliminate Scope 3 emissions by
2050.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://news.stanford.edu/report/2022/03/24/stanford-transitions-100-percent-renewable-electricity-second-solar-plant-goes-online/">https://news.stanford.edu/report/2022/03/24/stanford-transitions-100-percent-renewable-electricity-second-solar-plant-goes-online/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<i>[ Only a few months ago, feels like ages... ] </i><br>
<b>Top climate scientists are sceptical that nations will rein in
global warming</b><br>
A Nature survey reveals that many authors of the latest IPCC
climate-science report are anxious about the future and expect to
see catastrophic changes in their lifetimes.<br>
Jeff Tollefson -- 1 November 2021<br>
- -<br>
“Right now, governments are just at the stage of providing green
promises, but so far we have not seen any actions to curb
greenhouse-gas emissions,” says Mouhamadou Bamba Sylla, an IPCC
author and climate modeller at the African Institute for
Mathematical Sciences in Kigali, Rwanda. Sylla says his home country
of Senegal has gone through all the motions and developed adaptation
plans for a warming climate, but is anything changing on the ground?
“I don’t think so,” he says.<br>
<b>Climate anxiety</b><br>
The scientists surveyed by Nature are part of the IPCC working group
charged with assessing the causes and extent of climate change.
Their latest report, approved by 195 governments in August,
concluded that fossil-fuel emissions are driving unprecedented
planetary changes, threatening both people and the ecosystems that
humans rely on for food and other resources. “Unless there are
immediate, rapid and large-scale reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions, limiting warming to close to 1.5 °C or even 2° C will be
beyond reach,” the IPCC said. But in announcing the report, IPCC
scientists stressed that these goals could still be achieved...<br>
- -<br>
The Dixie wildfire in California this year was the second-largest in
state history, and was fuelled by high temperatures and drought.
Credit: Eric Thayer/Bloomberg/Getty<br>
<br>
As a leading climate scientist, Paola Arias doesn’t need to look far
to see the world changing. Shifting rain patterns threaten water
supplies in her home city of Medellín, Colombia, while rising sea
levels endanger the country’s coastline. She isn’t confident that
international leaders will slow global warming or that her own
government can handle the expected fallout, such as mass migrations
and civil unrest over rising inequality. With such an uncertain
future, she thought hard several years ago about whether to have
children.<br>
<br>
“My answer was no,” says Arias, a researcher at the University of
Antioquia in Medellín, who was one of the 234 scientists who wrote a
climate-science report published by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) in August (see go.nature.com/3pjupro). That
assessment, which makes clear that the world is running out of time
to avoid the most severe impacts of climate change, will figure
prominently in climate negotiations over the next two weeks at the
COP26 meeting in Glasgow, UK.<br>
<br>
Many other leading climate researchers share Arias’s concerns about
the future. Nature conducted an anonymous survey of the 233 living
IPCC authors last month and received responses from 92 scientists —
about 40% of the group. Their answers suggest strong scepticism that
governments will markedly slow the pace of global warming, despite
political promises made by international leaders as part of the 2015
Paris climate agreement.<br>
<br>
Six in ten of the respondents said that they expect the world to
warm by at least 3 °C by the end of the century, compared with what
conditions were like before the Industrial Revolution. That is far
beyond the Paris agreement’s goal to limit warming to 1.5–2 °C...<br>
- -<br>
Most of the survey’s respondents — 88% — said they think global
warming constitutes a ‘crisis’, and nearly as many said they expect
to see catastrophic impacts of climate change in their lifetimes.
Just under half said that global warming has caused them to
reconsider major life decisions, such as where to live and whether
to have children. More than 60% said that they experience anxiety,
grief or other distress because of concerns over climate change.<br>
<br>
Pie chart showing 88% of respondents think the world is experiencing
a climate crisis.<br>
Source: Nature analysis<br>
<br>
For Arias, who frequently sees the impacts of political instability
out of her office window as immigrants from strife-torn Venezuela
wander the streets seeking food and shelter, the choice about
children came naturally. She says many friends and colleagues have
arrived at the same conclusion. “I’m not saying that that is a
decision that everyone should make,” she says, “but it’s not
something I am struggling with much any more.”...<br>
- -<br>
The pessimism expressed by some IPCC panellists underscores the vast
gulf between hopes and expectations for the climate summit that
began this week in Glasgow. In advance of the meeting, the United
States, the European Union, China and others have announced new
plans to curb greenhouse-gas emissions, although scientific analyses
suggest those plans still fall well short of the Paris goals. Over
the next two weeks, countries will formalize — and perhaps even
strengthen — those commitments. But making them a reality will
require as-yet-unprecedented political mobilization at the national
level once leaders return home...<br>
- -<br>
“Right now, governments are just at the stage of providing green
promises, but so far we have not seen any actions to curb
greenhouse-gas emissions,” says Mouhamadou Bamba Sylla, an IPCC
author and climate modeller at the African Institute for
Mathematical Sciences in Kigali, Rwanda. Sylla says his home country
of Senegal has gone through all the motions and developed adaptation
plans for a warming climate, but is anything changing on the ground?
“I don’t think so,” he says.<br>
<br>
<b>Climate anxiety</b><br>
The scientists surveyed by Nature are part of the IPCC working group
charged with assessing the causes and extent of climate change.
Their latest report, approved by 195 governments in August,
concluded that fossil-fuel emissions are driving unprecedented
planetary changes, threatening both people and the ecosystems that
humans rely on for food and other resources. “Unless there are
immediate, rapid and large-scale reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions, limiting warming to close to 1.5 °C or even 2° C will be
beyond reach,” the IPCC said. But in announcing the report, IPCC
scientists stressed that these goals could still be achieved...<br>
- -<br>
A separate report from the United Nations Environment Programme last
week projected that the climate commitments already announced by
nations would put the world on a path towards 2.7 °C of warming by
the end of the century (see go.nature.com/3vphvtu). Other
projections raise the possibility of even more reductions. The
Climate Action Tracker, a consortium of scientific and academic
organizations, estimates that warming would be limited to 2.4 °C if
countries follow through on their latest pledges under the Paris
agreement. One of the goals of the climate negotiations is to prompt
more-ambitious steps for limiting greenhouse-gas emissions, but most
respondents to the Nature survey seemed to be pessimistic about
future policies and the amount of warming (see Supplementary
information for survey data tables).<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-021-02990-w/19817644">https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-021-02990-w/19817644</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02990-w">https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02990-w</a>
<p>- -</p>
<i>[ See some data ]</i><br>
<b>Nature survey of IPCC authors: data tables</b><br>
Nature e-mailed a survey in September 2021 to the 233* authors and
review editors listed in the<br>
Working Group I Sixth Assessment Report by the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC; see<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://go.nature.com/3nfvpz2">https://go.nature.com/3nfvpz2</a>). Respondents’ answers are anonymous;
some people opted to share<br>
their names and e-mails for potential follow-up with Nature
reporters. Ninety-two people responded,<br>
but some did not answer all questions<br>
<b>Do you think that climate scientists should engage in advocacy on
this issue?</b><br>
No 17 19%<br>
Yes 73 81%<br>
Total Responses 90<br>
<b>Do you engage in advocacy related to climate change?</b><br>
No 31 34%<br>
Yes 60 66%<br>
Total Responses 91<br>
If yes, which kind of advocacy activities do you engage in? (You may
select multiple options.)<br>
Promote science through speeches, publication or videos 59 98%<br>
Contact lawmakers or government officials to advocate specific
climate policies 24 40%<br>
Sign letters or petitions calling for action 26 43%<br>
Participate in demonstrations 15 25%<br>
Other 13 22%<br>
(Percentages out of the 60 people who answered yes to the previous
question.)<br>
<b>Do you experience anxiety, grief or other distress because of
concerns over climate change?</b><br>
No 36 39%<br>
Yes, frequently 19 21%<br>
Yes, infrequently 37 40%<br>
Total responses 92<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-021-02990-w/19817644">https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-021-02990-w/19817644</a><br>
- -<br>
<i>[ See a list of IPCC contributors ]</i><br>
<b>Working Group I contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
(AR6-WG1)</b><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://apps.ipcc.ch/report/authors/report.authors.php?q=35&p=">https://apps.ipcc.ch/report/authors/report.authors.php?q=35&p=</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
[ Hunziker conversation - video ]<br>
<b>The real state of our Biosphere with Robert Hunziker</b><br>
Sep 22, 2021<br>
The Nicky Rew Podcast<br>
302 subscribers<br>
Robert Hunziker has an MA in economic history from DePaul
University, awarded membership in Pi Gamma Mu International Academic
Honor Society in Social Sciences is a freelance writer and
environmental journalist who has over 200 articles published,
including several translated into foreign languages, appearing in
over 50 journals, magazines, and sites worldwide. He has been
interviewed on numerous FM radio programs, as well as television.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90JYH_zCIKI">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90JYH_zCIKI</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<i>[ Netflix wants your subscription... and see the movie ]</i><br>
<b>Could ‘Don’t Look Up’ Have Ended Differently?</b><br>
“No comet,” say 14 climate experts who’ve penned more hopeful
finales to the film.<br>
By Henry Goldblatt<br>
March 17, 2022<br>
<i>Warning: This article contains spoilers for the ending ...t.</i><br>
<br>
Toward the end of Don’t Look Up, things aren’t looking so good for
Ole Mother Earth. A comet has pummeled her pretty badly, and her
inhabitants aren’t faring any better: In a post-credits scene,
President Orlean’s son, Jason (Jonah Hill), is seemingly the only
survivor. Director Adam McKay says the cataclysmic conclusion “was
supposed to gradually take us from our ridiculous entertainment-,
political- and distraction-driven society into the cascading light
of reality. That reality of course being the comet’s inevitable
impact.” Viewers and critics alike drew parallels to the climate
crisis.<br>
<br>
But did the movie have to end in catastrophe for citizens to learn
some much-needed lessons? That’s a question that intrigued McKay.
So, with his encouragement, we solicited alternate — and more
optimistic — endings from an international array of climate experts
and legends (see: Jane Goodall) whose specialties range from
meteorology to community activism. “I love the idea of climate
leaders, activists and scientists showing us how we can, in fact,
create a different ending,” McKay says. “We are not a passive
audience to this climate crisis. We can act. We can make choices.”<br>
<br>
Here are their cheerier suggestions — ones that will reaffirm your
faith in humanity...<br>
(see details) - -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/could-dont-look-up-have-ended-differently">https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/could-dont-look-up-have-ended-differently</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<i>[The news archive - looking back]</i><br>
<font size="5"><b>March 28, 2001</b></font><br>
President George W. Bush says his administration will not honor the
Kyoto Protocol.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://archives.nbclearn.com/portal/site/k-12/flatview?cuecard=238">http://archives.nbclearn.com/portal/site/k-12/flatview?cuecard=238</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
More information from daily summaries <br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
Climate Nexus <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the day,
delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting.
It also provides original reporting and commentary on climate
denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise remain
largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
<br>
================================= <br>
<br>
Carbon Brief Daily <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a>
<br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
<br>
================================== <br>
<br>
The Daily Climate Subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better
than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters too <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/</p>
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html"
moz-do-not-send="true"><https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/2017-October/date.html></a>
/<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote</a><br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"
moz-do-not-send="true"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a hobby production curated by Richard
Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">contact@theclimate.vote</a> <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote" moz-do-not-send="true"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://TheClimate.Vote</a> <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"
moz-do-not-send="true"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>