<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+2"><i><b>November 14, 2022</b></i></font><br>
<br>
<i>[ NPR reports on COP27 ]</i><br>
<b>What’s on the climate agenda as COP27 enters its final week</b><br>
PBS NewsHour<br>
Nov 13, 2022<br>
For 27 years, the United Nations has held annual gatherings of world
leaders to discuss how to combat climate change. Yet progress
towards the goal of stopping global warming has been elusive, and
this year’s summit is happening against the backdrop of host country
Egypt's record of human rights abuses. Sarah Kaplan, climate
reporter for the Washington Post, joins Ali Rogin to discuss.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qz5wubexJ8I">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qz5wubexJ8I</a> <br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<i>[ Young climate journalist with video show ]</i><br>
<b>COP27 Week 1 Recap: Loss and damage funding, early warning system
deployment plans</b><br>
Beckisphere Climate Corner<br>
Nov 13, 2022<br>
If you like the work I do, please consider joining the Beckisphere
Patreon at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.patreon.com/beckisphere">https://www.patreon.com/beckisphere</a> or buying me a cup of
coffee at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.buymeacoffee.com/beckisphere">https://www.buymeacoffee.com/beckisphere</a>. Remember to talk
about the climate crisis every day and support your local news
organizations! <br>
<br>
Source list-
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://heavenly-sceptre-002.notion.site/COP27-week-1-0acdb4cd349941568aa6c4c4cd97ed15">https://heavenly-sceptre-002.notion.site/COP27-week-1-0acdb4cd349941568aa6c4c4cd97ed15</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTmSesa16Nk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTmSesa16Nk</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<i>[ From the Economist - video opinion ]</i><br>
<b>COP27: who should pay for a warming planet?</b><br>
The Economist<br>
Nov 9, 2022<br>
Campaigners who believe world leaders are not doing enough to combat
climate change are taking matters into their own hands—and suing
governments and fossil-fuel companies. But can the climate
catastrophe really be resolved in court?<br>
<blockquote>00:00 - A rapidly warming world<br>
01:25 - Climate effects in Peru<br>
03:54 - Climate adaptation funding<br>
05:17 - Peru farmer v RWE<br>
08:36 - Rise in climate litigation cases<br>
09:49 - Landmark win for the Torres Strait Islands<br>
12:58 - Is this the future for tackling climate change?<br>
</blockquote>
Read our special report on climate adaptation:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://econ.st/3zFbO2k">https://econ.st/3zFbO2k</a> <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Okcu19z3_U">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Okcu19z3_U</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Clips from a classic essay from great Harvard professor and her
researcher ]</i><br>
<b>A Brief History of How Big Oil Outplayed Us All</b><br>
For a century, the fossil fuel industry has outmaneuvered regulators
and the public to lock in its power and profits, at the world’s
expense.<br>
NAOMI ORESKES AND JEFF NESBIT DECEMBER 23, 2021<br>
<i>Editor’s Note: This article is published as part of Covering
Climate Now, a global collaboration of news outlets strengthening
coverage of the climate story.</i><br>
<br>
Despite countless investigations, lawsuits, social shaming, and
regulations dating back decades, the oil and gas industry remains
formidable. After all, it has made consuming its products seem like
a human necessity. It has confused the public about climate science,
bought the eternal gratitude of one of America’s two main political
parties, and repeatedly out-maneuvered regulatory efforts. And it
has done all this in part by thinking ahead and then acting
ruthlessly. While the rest of us were playing checkers, its
executives were playing three-dimensional chess.<br>
<br>
Take this brief tour of the industry’s history, and then ask
yourself: Is there any doubt that these companies are now plotting
to keep the profits rolling in, even as mega-hurricanes and roaring
wildfires scream the dangers of the climate emergency? <br>
<br>
<b>The John D. Rockefeller Myth</b><b><br>
</b>Ida Tarbell is one of the most celebrated investigative
journalists in American history. Long before Bob Woodward and Carl
Bernstein exposed the Watergate scandal, Tarbell’s reporting broke
up the Standard Oil monopoly. In 19 articles that became a widely
read book, History of the Standard Oil Company, published in 1904,
she exposed its unsavory practices. In 1911, federal regulators used
Tarbell’s findings to break Standard Oil into 33 much smaller
companies.<br>
David had slayed Goliath. The U.S. government had set a
monopoly-busting standard for future generations. John D.
Rockefeller, Standard Oil’s owner, lost. The good guys won — or so
it seemed.<br>
<br>
In fact, Rockefeller saw what was coming and ended up
profiting — massively — from the breakup of his company. Rockefeller
made sure to retain significant stock holdings in each of Standard
Oil’s 33 offspring and position them in different parts of the U.S.
where they wouldn’t compete against one another. Collectively, the
33 offspring went on to make Rockefeller very, very rich. Indeed, it
was the breakup of Standard Oil that tripled his wealth and made him
the wealthiest man in the world. In 1916, five years after Standard
Oil was broken up, Rockefeller became the world’s first billionaire.
<br>
<b><br>
</b><b>Say It Ain’t So, Dr. Seuss!</b><br>
One of the offspring of Standard Oil was Esso (S-O, spelled out),
which later launched one of the most successful advertising
campaigns in history. It did so by relying on the talents of a young
cartoonist who millions would later adore under his pen name, Dr.
Seuss. Decades before authoring the pro-environment parable The
Lorax, Theodore Geisel helped Esso market “Flit,” a household spray
gun that killed mosquitoes. What Americans weren’t told was that the
pesticide DDT made up 5% of each blast of Flit.<br>
When Esso put considerable creative resources behind the Flit
campaign, they were looking years ahead to a time when they would
also successfully market oil-based products. The campaign ran for 17
years in the 1940s and 1950s, at the time an unheard length of time
for an ad campaign. It taught Esso and other Standard Oil companies
how to sell derivative products (like plastic and pesticides) that
made the company and the brand a household name in the minds of the
public. In its day, “Quick, Henry, the Flit!” was as ubiquitous as
“Got Milk?” is today.<br>
<br>
At the time, the public (and even many scientists) didn’t appreciate
the deadly nature of DDT. That didn’t come until the 1962
publication of Rachel Carson’s book Silent Spring. But accepting
that DDT was deadly was hard, in part because of the genius of
Geisel, whose wacky characters — strikingly similar to the figures
who would later populate Dr. Seuss books — energetically extolled
Flit’s alleged benefits. <br>
<br>
Geisel later said the experience “taught me conciseness and how to
marry pictures with words.” The Flit ad campaign was incredibly
smart and clever marketing. It taught the industry how to sell a
dangerous and unnecessary product as if it were something useful and
even fun. Years later, ExxonMobil would take that cleverness to new
heights in its advertorials. They weren’t about clever characters.
But they were awfully clever, containing few, if any, outright lies,
but a whole lot of half-truths and misrepresentations. It was clever
enough to convince the New York Times to run them without labeling
them as the advertisements that they, in fact, were. Their climate
“advertorials” appeared in the op-ed page of the New York Times and
were part of what scholars have called “the longest, regular
(weekly) use of media to influence public and elite opinion in
contemporary America.”<br>
<br>
<b>Controlling Climate Science</b><br>
Big Oil also saw climate change coming. As abundant investigative
reporting and academic studies have documented, the companies’ own
scientists were telling their executives in the 1970s that burning
more oil and other fossil fuels would overheat the planet. (Other
scientists had been saying so since the 1960s.) The companies
responded by lying about the danger of their products, blunting
public awareness, and lobbying against government action. The result
is today’s climate emergency. <br>
<br>
Less well-known is how oil and gas companies didn’t just lie about
their own research. They also mounted a stealth campaign to monitor
and influence what the rest of the scientific community learned and
said about climate change.<br>
The companies embedded scientists in universities and made sure they
were present at important conferences. They nominated them to be
contributors to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the
UN body whose assessments from 1990 onward defined what the press,
public, and policymakers thought was true about climate science.
While the IPCC reports, which rely on consensus science, were sound,
Big Oil’s scientific participation gave them an insider’s view of
the road ahead. More ominously, they introduced the art of
questioning the consensus science in forums where every word is
parsed.<br>
<br>
The industry was employing a strategy pioneered by tobacco
companies, but with a twist. Beginning in the 1950s, the tobacco
industry cultivated a sotto voce network of scientists at scores of
American universities and medical schools, whose work it funded.
Some of these scientists were actively engaged in research to
discredit the idea that cigarette smoking was a health risk, but
most of it was more subtle; the industry supported research on
causes of cancer and heart disease other than tobacco, such as
radon, asbestos, and diet. It was a form of misdirection, designed
to deflect our attention away from the harms of tobacco and onto
other things. The scheme worked for a while, but when it was exposed
in the 1990s, in part through lawsuits, the bad publicity largely
killed it. What self-respecting scientist would take tobacco
industry money after that? <br>
<br>
The oil and gas industry learned from that mistake and decided that,
instead of working surreptitiously, it would work in the open. And
rather than work primarily with individual scientists whose work
might be of use, it would seek to influence the direction of the
scientific community as a whole. The industry’s internal scientists
continued to do research and publish peer-reviewed articles, but the
industry also openly funded university collaborations and other
researchers. From the late 1970s through the 1980s, Exxon was known
both as a climate research pioneer, and as a generous patron of
university science, supporting student research and fellowships at
many major universities. Its scientists also worked alongside senior
colleagues at NASA, the Department of Energy, and other key
institutions, and funded breakfasts, luncheons, and other activities
at scientific meetings. Those efforts had the net effect of creating
goodwill and bonds of loyalty. It’s been effective. <br>
<p>The industry’s scientists may have been operating in good faith,
but their work helped delay public recognition of the scientific
consensus that climate change was unequivocally man-made,
happening now, and very dangerous. The industry’s extensive
presence in the field also gave it early access to cutting edge
research it used to its advantage. Exxon, for example, designed
oil platforms to accommodate more rapid sea level rise, even as
the company publicly denied that climate change was occurring.</p>
<b>Don’t Call It Methane, It’s “</b><b>Natural” Gas</b><br>
Methane is an even more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide,
yet it has received far less attention. One reason is that the oil
and gas industry has positioned methane— which marketing experts
cleverly labeled “natural gas” — as the future of the energy
economy. The industry promotes methane gas as a “clean” fuel that’s
needed to bridge the transition from today’s carbon economy to
tomorrow’s renewable energy era. Some go further and see gas as a
permanent part of the energy landscape: BP’s plan is renewables plus
gas for the foreseeable future, and the company and other oil majors
frequently invoke “low carbon” instead of “no carbon.”<br>
<br>
Except that methane gas isn’t clean. It’s about 80 times more potent
at trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide is. <br>
<br>
As recently as a decade ago, many scientists and environmentalists
viewed “natural gas” as a climate hero. The oil and gas industry’s
ad guys encouraged this view by portraying gas as a coal killer. The
American Petroleum Institute paid millions to run its first-ever
Super Bowl ad in 2017, portraying gas as an engine of innovation
that powers the American way of life. Between 2008 and 2019, API
spent more than $750 million on public relations, advertising, and
communications (for both oil and gas interests), an analysis by the
Climate Investigations Center found. Today, most Americans view gas
as clean, even though science shows that we can’t meet our climate
goals without quickly transitioning away from it. The bottom line is
that we can’t solve a problem caused by fossil fuels with more
fossil fuels. But the industry has made a lot of us think otherwise.
<br>
<br>
There’s little chance the oil and gas industry can defeat renewable
energy in the long term. Wind, solar, and geothermal, which are
clean and cost-competitive, will eventually dominate energy markets.
Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, GridLab, and
Energy Innovation have found that the U.S. can achieve 90% clean
electricity by the year 2035 with no new gas and at no additional
cost to consumers. But the oil and gas industry doesn’t need to win
the fight in the long term. It just needs to win right now so it can
keep developing oil and gas fields that will be in use for decades
to come. To do that, it just has to keep doing what it has done for
the past 25 years: win today, fight again tomorrow. <br>
<br>
<b>A Spider’s Web of Pipelines</b><br>
Here’s a final example of how the oil and gas industry plans for the
next war even as its adversaries are still fighting the last one.
Almost no one outside of a few law firms, trade groups, and
congressional staff in Washington, DC, knows what the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission is or does. But the oil and gas industry knows
and it moved quickly after Donald Trump became president to lay the
groundwork for decades of future fossil fuel dependency. <br>
<br>
FERC has long been a rubber stamp for the oil and gas industry. The
industry proposes gas pipelines, and FERC approves them. When FERC
approves a pipeline, that approval grants the pipeline eminent
domain, which in effect makes the pipeline all but impossible to
stop.<br>
<br>
Once pipelines are in the system, companies can start to build them.
This strategy could allow the oil and gas industry to lock in fossil
fuel dependency for the rest of the century.<br>
Eminent domain gives a company the legal right to build a pipeline
through landowners’ properties, and there is nothing they or state
or county officials can do about it. A couple of states have
successfully, though temporarily, blocked pipelines by invoking
federal statutes such as the Clean Water Act. But if those state
cases reach the current Supreme Court, the three justices Trump
appointed — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy
Coney-Barrett — are almost certain to rule in the industry’s favor.<br>
<br>
Oil and gas industry executives seized upon Trump’s arrival in the
White House. In the opening days of his administration, independent
researchers listened in on public trade gatherings of the
executives, who talked about “flooding the zone” at FERC. The
industry planned to submit not just one or two but nearly a dozen
interstate gas pipeline requests. Plotted on a map, the projected
pipelines covered so much of the U.S. that they resembled a spider’s
web. <br>
<br>
Once pipelines are in the system, companies can start to build them,
and utility commissioners in every corner of America see this gas
“infrastructure” as a fait accompli. And pipelines are built to
last decades. In fact, if properly maintained, a pipeline can last
forever in principle. This strategy could allow the oil and gas
industry to lock in fossil fuel dependency for the rest of the
century. <br>
<br>
In hindsight, it’s clear that oil and gas industry leaders used
outright climate denial when it suited their corporate and political
interests throughout the 1990s. But now that outright denial is no
longer credible, they’ve pivoted from denial to delay. Industry PR
and marketing efforts have shifted massive resources to a central
message that, yes, climate change is real, but that the necessary
changes will require more research and decades to implement, and
above all, more fossil fuels. Climate delay is the new climate
denial.<br>
<br>
Nearly every major oil and gas company now claims that they accept
the science and that they support sensible climate policies. But
their actions speak louder than words. It’s clear that the future
they want is one that still uses fossil fuels
abundantly — regardless of what the science says. Whether it is
selling deadly pesticides or deadly fossil fuels, they will do what
it takes to keep their products on the market. Now that we’re in a
race to a clean energy future, it’s time to recognize that they
simply can’t be trusted as partners in that race. We’ve been fooled
too many times.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://inthesetimes.com/article/oil-gas-industry-strategy-advertising-seuss-pipeline-climate-change-science">https://inthesetimes.com/article/oil-gas-industry-strategy-advertising-seuss-pipeline-climate-change-science</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><i>[ Discussion with Prof Kevin Anderson - from the Oil Machine ]</i><br>
<b>After THE OIL MACHINE: Kevin Anderson</b><br>
Sonja Henrici Creates<br>
Oct 31, 2022<br>
The issues raised in the film THE OIL MACHINE have become even
more urgent with recent upheavals in energy security, the cost of
living, and our climate. At the same time, the UK government is
rushing to offer 100 new licences for North Sea oil and gas
exploration. One year on from the COP26 climate conference in
Glasgow, we’re now going back to the film’s contributors to ask
them how recent global events have shaped the ongoing debate about
oil.<br>
<br>
Here's our catch-up with Kevin Anderson, a professor of energy and
climate change, and now also a co-founder of Climate Uncensored.<br>
<br>
See our events and get involved at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.theoilmachine.org">https://www.theoilmachine.org</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYk9Do01mT0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYk9Do01mT0</a><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ this film produced by the IPCC ]</i><br>
<b>Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation & Vulnerability -
Full video</b><br>
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)<br>
Read the report:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-ii/">https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-ii/</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDRxfuEvqGg">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDRxfuEvqGg</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<i>[ Earth Stories video channel documentaries ]</i><br>
<b>Earth Stories - Climate Change Documentaries</b><br>
Description<br>
Our planet is an extraordinary place teeming with life, wonder and
beauty. Earth Stories takes a look at the world through this lens,
bringing you the best documentaries and factual series showcasing
the place we all call home; its scale, its majesty, and the
precarious balance that we risk tipping forever with global warming.
<br>
Subscribe for incredible documentaries all about the place we call
home, Earth.<br>
Earth Stories is part of the Little Dot Studios Network<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg82Mk_bTfGbFqxFY_CENVA">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg82Mk_bTfGbFqxFY_CENVA</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ great lecture on the economics of oil and the wars of this
world -- video from Sept 2022 ]</i><br>
<b>Keynote – Peter Zeihan - 2022</b><br>
The ECC Association<br>
767,623 views Sep 23, 2022<br>
Presented Sept. 8, 2022 at the 54th Annual ECC PerspECCtive
Conference in San Antonio, Texas. “Energy at the End of the World”.
Peter Zeihan is a geopolitical strategist whose irreverent approach
transforms topics that are normally dense and heavy into accessible,
relevant takeaways for audiences of all types. Peter combines an
expert understanding of demography, economics, energy, politics,
technology, and security to help clients best prepare for an
uncertain future. <br>
<br>
Peter’s fourth book, "The End of the World is Just the Beginning:
Mapping the Collapse of Globalization" was released in June 2022.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UA-jOLF2T4c">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UA-jOLF2T4c</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
<i>[ another one from Peter Zeihan - more succinct video ]</i><br>
<b>The Eurasian Hordelands | Peter Zeihan</b><br>
Geopolitics Now<br>
Nov 12, 2022<br>
Excerpt from the Linkages Conference on October 21, 2022.<br>
Northern Manitoba and the World.<br>
Presented by University College of the North, Manitoba Chamber of
Commerce and Look North<br>
<br>
Maps are from The End of the World is Just the Beginning<br>
See the maps, sign up to Peter’s Newsletter and order the book
here…<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://zeihan.com/">https://zeihan.com/</a><br>
<br>
This channel is not run by Peter Zeihan. He has a very active
channel here…<br>
@Zeihan on Geopolitics <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQAb6XCXiPw">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQAb6XCXiPw</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[The news archive - looking back]</i><br>
<font size="+2"><i><b>November 14, 2012</b></i></font> <br>
November 14, 2012: At a post-election press conference, President
Obama declares:<br>
<br>
"I think the American people right now have been so focused, and
will continue to be focused on our economy and jobs and growth, that
if the message is somehow we’re going to ignore jobs and growth
simply to address climate change, I don’t think anybody is going to
go for that. I won’t go for that. If, on the other hand, we can
shape an agenda that says we can create jobs, advance growth, and
make a serious dent in climate change and be an international
leader, I think that’s something that the American people would
support."<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlF6ikIbjGU">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlF6ikIbjGU</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<p>======================================= <br>
<b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is
lacking, here are a few </span>daily summaries<span
class="moz-txt-tag"> of global warming news - email delivered*</span></b>
<br>
<br>
=========================================================<br>
<b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day
or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top
headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the day,
delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting.
It also provides original reporting and commentary on climate
denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise remain
largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
<b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon
Brief Daily <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better
than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</p>
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a hobby production curated by Richard
Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</body>
</html>