<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="+2"><i><b>November 20, 2022</b></i></font><br>
</p>
<i>[ Some COP27 success reported NYT ]</i><br>
<b>In a First, Rich Countries Agree to Pay for Climate Damages in
Poor Nations</b><br>
After 30 years of deadlock, a new U.N. climate agreement aims to pay
developing countries for loss and damage caused by global warming.
But huge questions remain about how it would work.<br>
By Brad Plumer, Lisa Friedman, Max Bearak and Jenny Gross<br>
Nov. 19, 2022<br>
SHARM EL SHEIKH, Egypt — Negotiators from nearly 200 countries
agreed for the first time to establish a fund that would help poor,
vulnerable countries cope with climate disasters made worse by the
pollution spewed by wealthy nations that is dangerously heating the
planet.<br>
<br>
The decision regarding payments for climate damage marked a
breakthrough on one of the most contentious issues at United Nations
climate negotiations. For more than three decades, developing
nations have pressed for loss and damage money, asking rich,
industrialized countries to provide compensation for the costs of
destructive storms, heat waves and droughts fueled by global
warming.<br>
<br>
But the United States and other wealthy countries had long blocked
the idea, for fear that they could be held legally liable for the
greenhouse gas emissions that are driving climate change.<br>
<br>
The agreement hammered out in this Red Sea resort town says nations
cannot be held legally liable for payments. The deal calls for a
committee with representatives from 24 countries to work over the
next year to figure out exactly what form the fund should take,
which countries should contribute and where the money should go.
Many of the other details are still to be determined...<br>
The creation of a loss and damage fund was almost derailed by
disputes that ran into the dawn hours of Sunday over other elements
of a broader agreement, including how deeply countries should cut
their emissions and whether to include language that explicitly
called for a phaseout of fossil fuels, including coal, natural gas
and oil. By 5 a.m. in Egypt, negotiators were still debating those
other measures.<br>
<br>
Developing nations — largely from Asia, Africa, Latin America, the
Caribbean and South Pacific — fought first to place the loss and
damage fund on the formal agenda of the two-week summit. And then
they were relentless in their pressure campaign, arguing that it was
a matter of justice, noting they did little to contribute to a
crisis that threatens their existence. They made it clear that a
summit held on the African continent that ended without addressing
loss and damage would be seen as a moral failure.<br>
<br>
“The announcement offers hope to vulnerable communities all over the
world who are fighting for their survival from climate stress,” said
Sherry Rehman, Pakistan’s minister for climate change. “And gives
some credibility to the COP process.”<br>
<br>
Pakistan, which spearheaded a group of 134 developing nations
pushing for loss and damage payments, provided a fresh reminder of
the destructive forces of climate change. Over the summer, Pakistan
suffered devastating flooding that scientists say was made worse by
global warming, resulting in more than 1,500 deaths, plunging
one-third of the country underwater and causing $30 billion in
damages, even as Pakistan contributes less than 1 percent of the
world’s planet-warming emissions.<br>
<br>
As the summit was nearing an end, the European Union consented to
the idea of a loss and damage fund, though it insisted that any aid
should be focused on the most vulnerable nations, and that aid might
include a wide variety of options such as new insurance programs in
addition to direct payments...<br>
That left the United States, which has pumped more greenhouse gases
into the atmosphere than any nation in history, as the last big
holdout. By Saturday, as talks stretched into overtime, American
officials said that they would accept a loss and damage fund,
breaking the logjam.<br>
<br>
Still, major hurdles remain.<br>
<br>
The United States and the European Union are pushing for assurances
that China will eventually contribute to any fund created — and that
China would not be eligible to receive money from it. The United
Nations currently classifies China as a developing country, which
would make it eligible for climate compensation, even though it is
now the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases as well as the
second-largest economy. China has fiercely resisted being treated as
a developed nation in global climate talks.<br>
<br>
There is also no guarantee that wealthy countries will deposit money
into the fund. A decade ago, the United States, the European Union
and other wealthy emitters pledged to mobilize $100 billion per year
in climate finance by 2020 to help poorer countries shift to clean
energy and adapt to future climate risks through measures like
building sea walls. They are still falling short by tens of billions
of dollars annually.<br>
<br>
While American diplomats agreed to a fund, money must be
appropriated by Congress. Last year, the Biden administration sought
$2.5 billion in climate finance but secured just $1 billion, and
that was when Democrats controlled both chambers. With Republicans,
who largely oppose climate aid, set to take over the House in
January, the prospects of Congress approving an entirely new pot of
money for loss and damage appear dim.<br>
<br>
“Sending U.S. taxpayer dollars to a U.N. sponsored green slush fund
is completely misguided,” said Senator John Barrasso, Republican of
Wyoming. “The Biden administration should focus on lowering spending
at home, not shipping money to the U.N. for new climate deals.
Innovation, not reparations, is key to fighting climate change.”<br>
<br>
For their part, a variety of European nations have voluntarily
pledged more than $300 million to address loss and damage so far,
with most of that money going toward a new insurance program to help
countries recover from disasters like flooding. Poorer countries
have praised those early efforts while noting that they may
ultimately face hundreds of billions of dollars per year in
unavoidable, irreversible climate damages.<br>
“We have the fund, but we need money to make it worthwhile,” said
Mohamed Adow, executive director of Power Shift Africa, a group that
aims to mobilize climate action across the continent. “What we have
is an empty bucket. Now we need to fill it so that support can flow
to the most impacted people who are suffering right now at the hands
of the climate crisis.”...<br>
There was a brewing debate over what to call the new fund.
Developing nations consider it “compensation” and climate activists
often refer to it as “reparations.” But diplomats, particularly the
Americans, called the money “loss and damage resources.”<br>
<br>
In addition to a loss and damage fund, developing nations used the
climate talks to push for reforms at two of the world’s biggest
lending institutions, the World Bank and International Monetary
Fund.<br>
<br>
The agreement reached in Sharm El Sheikh broaches the possibility of
both institutions paying into the loss and damage fund. Heavy debt
is one of the main obstacles developing countries face in being able
to respond adequately to climate-driven crises, both immediate and
long-term.<br>
<br>
The two-week summit, which was scheduled to end Friday, stretched
into Saturday as negotiators from nearly 200 nations clashed over
several thorny issues. The talks come at a time of multiple crises.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has roiled global food supply and
energy markets, stoked inflation and spurred some countries to burn
more coal and other alternatives to Russian gas, threatening to
undermine climate goals.<br>
<br>
At the same time, rising global temperatures have intensified deadly
floods in places like Pakistan and Nigeria, as well as fueled
record-breaking heat across Europe and Asia. In the Horn of Africa,
a third year of severe drought has brought millions to the brink of
famine.<br>
<br>
One area of concern at the talks was whether nations would strive to
keep global temperatures from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius
(2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, a goal that
nations emphasized at climate talks last year in Glasgow. Beyond
that threshold, scientists say, the risk of climate catastrophes
increases significantly...<br>
There was a brewing debate over what to call the new fund.
Developing nations consider it “compensation” and climate activists
often refer to it as “reparations.” But diplomats, particularly the
Americans, called the money “loss and damage resources.”<br>
<br>
In addition to a loss and damage fund, developing nations used the
climate talks to push for reforms at two of the world’s biggest
lending institutions, the World Bank and International Monetary
Fund.<br>
<br>
The agreement reached in Sharm El Sheikh broaches the possibility of
both institutions paying into the loss and damage fund. Heavy debt
is one of the main obstacles developing countries face in being able
to respond adequately to climate-driven crises, both immediate and
long-term.<br>
<br>
The two-week summit, which was scheduled to end Friday, stretched
into Saturday as negotiators from nearly 200 nations clashed over
several thorny issues. The talks come at a time of multiple crises.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has roiled global food supply and
energy markets, stoked inflation and spurred some countries to burn
more coal and other alternatives to Russian gas, threatening to
undermine climate goals.<br>
<br>
At the same time, rising global temperatures have intensified deadly
floods in places like Pakistan and Nigeria, as well as fueled
record-breaking heat across Europe and Asia. In the Horn of Africa,
a third year of severe drought has brought millions to the brink of
famine.<br>
<br>
One area of concern at the talks was whether nations would strive to
keep global temperatures from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius
(2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, a goal that
nations emphasized at climate talks last year in Glasgow. Beyond
that threshold, scientists say, the risk of climate catastrophes
increases significantly...<br>
The planet has already warmed by an average of 1.1 degrees Celsius,
and scientists have said that countries need to cut their carbon
emissions more quickly and more significantly to keep warming to 1.5
degrees Celsius. The world is currently on a trajectory to warm by
2.1 to 2.9 degrees Celsius by the end of this century.<br>
<br>
Every fraction of a degree of additional warming could mean tens of
millions more people worldwide exposed to life-threatening heat
waves, water shortages and coastal flooding, scientists have found.
A 1.5-degree world might still have coral reefs and summer Arctic
sea ice, while a 2-degree world most likely would not.<br>
<br>
“One point five is not just a number that somebody invented,” Espen
Barth Eide, Norway’s minister of climate and environment told the
conference on Friday. He spoke about “the paramount difference, the
dramatic difference between warming that ends at 1.5 and 2 degrees.”<br>
<br>
“Entire countries that are present here will simply disappear from
the surface of the planet. Most of all the ice on the world will
melt,” he said. “Cities we love and live in will be gone. It’s such
a drama in front of us that we simply have to make sure that we
stick to what we were told to do in Glasgow.”<br>
<br>
One of the biggest obstacles to a deal at this year’s talks,
negotiators said, was the chaotic management style of the Egyptian
hosts, whose job it is to understand the concerns of each country
and then broker a deal.<br>
<br>
Diplomats complained that the Egyptian presidency held
middle-of-the-night meetings and allowed delegates to see only
snippets of potential text. Technical issues with sound delayed
negotiating sessions. Lack of easy access to food and water also
slowed down progress; negotiators had to hunt for sandwiches and
coffee in the sprawling venue.<br>
<br>
“I’ve never experienced anything like this in 25 years,” said one
longtime delegate, who asked not to be identified because talks were
still ongoing. The delegate called the process “untransparent,
chaotic, unpredictable.”<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/19/climate/un-climate-damage-cop27.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/19/climate/un-climate-damage-cop27.html</a><br>
<p>- -<br>
</p>
<i>[ points in the COP27 negotiations - NewYorker ]</i><br>
<b>How to Pay for Climate Justice When Polluters Have All the Money</b><br>
The COP27 climate conference, in Egypt, was in large part a global
search for cash.<br>
By Bill McKibben<br>
November 19, 2022<br>
You can imagine the tension—the anger—that comes from watching your
part of the world dry up or flood, knowing that the countries whose
pollution caused your problems also have enough dollars to repair
the damage. The moral argument couldn’t be more straightforward:
Americans have produced almost a quarter of the excess carbon in the
atmosphere; a quarter of the damage should be on our tab. And yet we
have not yet started to pay it, not in any straightforward way:
Congress won’t spend tax dollars on reparations for the descendants
of enslaved Africans; they’re even more unlikely to do it for
survivors of the climate crisis in Africa or Asia. At least, not in
sums remotely equal to the damage: at cop27, a handful of the usual
countries (think Denmark) pledged climate-relief aid on the order of
about seventy-five million dollars, with an “M.” The initial
estimate of the damage from Pakistan’s wild summer of flooding, by
contrast, is about forty billion dollars, with a “B.”...<br>
<br>
So there needs to be some less direct way of accessing the wealth of
the north. More than half the world’s capital is in the U.S. and
Europe; more than a third of it is in the U.S. alone. Much of that
money lies in retirement accounts—money that isn’t charitable, and
won’t simply be turned over to cover what the U.N. calls the “loss
and damage” of climate change, no matter how just the claim of the
poor nations might be. But the trillions of dollars in those funds
could provide the financing that the developing world needs for an
energy transition—and if African nations have the funding to build,
say, solar arrays, they can generate lower-cost clean energy and
produce a return for American pensioners. At the moment, though,
that’s unlikely. Investing in an American wind farm is relatively
easy; the pension fund can predict their earnings based on a hundred
years of historical returns from utility companies. Investing in a
Senegalese solar company that lacks a track record, and which could
be at the whims of the local political and judicial system, would be
a different story. Because such investments are relatively risky,
pension funds would charge prohibitively high interest...<br>
- -<br>
There are even farther-reaching demands for reform of the global
financial system. Mia Mottley, the Prime Minister of Barbados, has
put forward what’s being called the Bridgetown Agenda, named for her
capital city. It calls for the I.M.F. to issue half a trillion
dollars in “special drawing rights,” or other financial instruments
to help boost investment in the Global South. “It’s a way of
rethinking the institutions created after World War Two” at the
Bretton Woods agreement, Gallagher said. “It would fully integrate
climate into their mandates,” which, she said, is necessary, because
the classic debt trap (where poor countries have to keep borrowing
just to pay off the interest on old debts) has been replaced with a
“climate-debt trap.” Countries suffer one climate disaster after
another, accruing enormous economic damage and having to borrow more
simply to build back to where they were. Such policies require
governments like ours to pony up more cash, but the poor nations are
not without leverage: world leaders such as Prime Minister Sheikh
Hasina, of Bangladesh, and former Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed
have raised the idea of a global debtors’ strike, arguing that the
high emitters have not kept their side of the bargain. If enough
countries decided not to pay interest to countries that continue to
spew carbon, they could conceivably influence the larger financial
system...<br>
None of these financial schemes precisely addresses the demand that
the most vulnerable nations are making: for money to cover their
devastating losses and damages. On Saturday, however, as the
conference came to a close, negotiators, including those from the
U.S., tentatively agreed to a concrete step in the right
direction—the formation of a loss-and-damage fund within the next
year, albeit without any details on who will fund it or how much
that funding will amount to. There’s also an insurance scheme—Global
Shield, its backers are calling it—that might offer relief in the
aftermath of crises. These steps will not produce forty billion
dollars when a country like Pakistan floods, at least not anytime
soon, nor will they repair the grinding, slow-motion
crises—desertification, drought, sea-level rise—that pose some of
the worst risks on an overheating planet. But they are evidence of
how hard the Global South is pushing, and how unimpeachably just
their demands are..<br>
COP27 is one more reminder, however, that justice only proceeds,
fitfully, through politics. Rebalancing the world’s wealth, even a
little, is the trickiest of political tasks. Yet our chances for a
livable world may depend on it. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/how-to-pay-for-climate-justice-when-polluters-have-all-the-money">https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/how-to-pay-for-climate-justice-when-polluters-have-all-the-money</a><br>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Novice journalist delivering sophisticated summaries ] </i><br>
<b>South Africa plans to switch from coal to clean energy, Rainn
Wilson changes his name | Recap</b><br>
Beckisphere Climate Corner<br>
Nov 19, 2022<br>
... Remember to talk about the climate crisis every day and support
your local news organizations! <br>
<blockquote>Timestamps-<br>
00:00 Intro<br>
02:00 Extreme weather events<br>
03:42 Climate studies<br>
16:20 Climate victories<br>
22:41 Rue break<br>
23:07 Climate fails<br>
27:21 One more climate victory<br>
28:18 Closing notes<br>
</blockquote>
Source list-
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://heavenly-sceptre-002.notion.site/Climate-Recap-Nov-19-11c4eb08b63b4653a4e182edbac157f5">https://heavenly-sceptre-002.notion.site/Climate-Recap-Nov-19-11c4eb08b63b4653a4e182edbac157f5</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAQNsUn27TY">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAQNsUn27TY</a>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ helps you recharge ] </i><br>
<b>Google Maps got a big update that shows where fast-charging EV
stations are and more</b><br>
PUBLISHED THU, NOV 17 202211:11 AM EST<br>
-- Google Maps was updated to show “fast charging” options when
looking for a station to charge your EV.<br>
-- Next week, an augmented reality feature called Search with Live
View will be available in six cities on Google Maps.<br>
-- Google also added accessibility information to maps globally.<br>
<b>Find fast chargers for your electric car</b><br>
If you drive an EV, you’ll be able to filter charging stations to
find the most time-efficient option. So, if you search for a
“charging station” in Google Maps, for example, a new option appears
that allows you to filter out to show only “fast charge” stations
that are compatible with the plug your car uses. It builds on an
earlier update that allows users to search for stations by plug
compatibility.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/17/google-maps-updates-for-ev-charging-augmented-reality-and-accessibility.html">https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/17/google-maps-updates-for-ev-charging-augmented-reality-and-accessibility.html</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ How to setup your solar panels - and a good channel to connect
with ]</i><br>
<b>$279 Ground Mount Solar Array - DIY Friendly!</b><br>
DIY Solar Power with Will Prowse<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ua3A_1uH1Jg">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ua3A_1uH1Jg</a><br>
- -<br>
<b>Top 10 Beginner Mistakes When Building a DIY Solar System</b><br>
DIY Solar Power with Will Prowse<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3dNJAe8XEc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3dNJAe8XEc</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Inevitable future - an opinion ]</i><br>
<b>The Global Carbon Surveillance State Is Coming</b><br>
Nov. 16, 2022<br>
David Wallace-Wells<br>
OPINION<br>
For decades, those of us wondering why so little action had been
taken to reduce carbon emissions, and why the public felt so little
urgency about that failure, would sometimes lament that carbon
dioxide was invisible. Unlike the pollution that smogged up cities,
set rivers on fire and inspired the Clean Air and Water Acts here
and similar legislation abroad, the stuff that was damaging the
climate was being put into the atmosphere without anyone really
seeing it.<br>
<br>
That’s why one of the most fascinating developments from this year’s
major climate conference, COP27, which kicked off Nov. 6 with the
U.N. secretary general António Guterres declaring that the world was
on a “highway to climate hell,” is a new online tool released by the
nonprofit coalition Climate Trace that allows us to see emissions in
near-real time.<br>
<br>
For a while, we’ve used ballpark estimates for emissions from
countries, industries and the planet as a whole. The point of the
Climate Trace project is to bring it down to the level of individual
polluting facilities: to make it possible to track climate-damaging
carbon released from more than 72,000 “steel and cement factories,
power plants, oil and gas fields, cargo ships, cattle feedlots,” as
The Times put it — to name just a handful of the sources...<br>
- -<br>
The Climate Trace project doesn’t turn that carbon from invisible to
red or green, and it is only one of many recent efforts to better
assess the real-time state of emissions rather than imprecise
approximations and modeling. But it marks another step toward what
is beginning to seem like the inevitable development of a sort of
global carbon surveillance state — one which, even independent of
any global enforcement mechanism, promises to change some aspects of
the conventional picture of climate change and what is causing it.<br>
- -<br>
The basics, of course, remain the same: The world’s carbon emissions
are produced primarily from the burning of fossil fuel, and the
power, transportation and industrial sectors dominate. But examining
the flow of pollution in a more granular and detailed way does
change some features of the carbon landscape in three key ways.<br>
<br>
To begin with, methane begins to look much more significant.
Typically, when we talk about emissions we talk about carbon
dioxide, of which about 40 gigatons a year are released globally.
But the true total figure of planet-warming emissions, calculated
using a standard called carbon dioxide equivalent, is about 50
gigatons each year, with most of the additional 10 gigatons coming
from methane, another greenhouse gas, produced both from industrial
activity like fracking and from agriculture, land-use changes and
melting permafrost. In recent years there’s been a flurry of
research documenting the sources of methane, which had been somewhat
secret and elusive before. The studies almost invariably found that
much more of it was being released than was previously acknowledged.
(A study published in 2019, for instance, suggests that oil and gas
emissions in the south central region of the United States were
twice the Environmental Protection Agency’s estimate.)<br>
<br>
Second, it starts to seem less intuitive that we should build our
understanding of emissions and decarbonization around the unit of
the nation. For most of the decades in which laypeople have been
worrying about climate, countries have been the conventional
framework for tabulating emissions because they were the basic
building block of climate policy — and because our best hopes for
cutting emissions seemed to rest on things like national carbon
taxes and renewable subsidies, we tracked progress country by
country as well.<br>
<br>
But the atmosphere doesn’t recognize borders, and the Trace
satellites show outsize damage being done by, for example, an oil
and gas field in Algeria producing more than 73 million tons of
emissions, an iron and steel factory in China producing 22 million
tons and a coal-powered power plant in West Virginia producing 10
million tons. (You can rabbit-hole through the mesmerizing and
intuitive data here.)<br>
<br>
Removing borders from our model of carbon emissions doesn’t just
draw attention to polluting sites and industries, as the Trace
satellite data suggests, it also raises the question of who within
those countries is responsible — which individuals have the largest
carbon footprints. And while at the moment that data is as invisible
to satellites as it is to the naked eye, the sub-national
distribution of emissions has been a growing preoccupation of
climate researchers in recent years, with more and more attention
paid particularly to the unequal distribution of emissions within
countries (as opposed to the much more known unequal distribution
between countries).<br>
- -<br>
The emerging surveillance state also points the way to a third
change in the way we think about emissions, offering another piece
of the emerging framework for global sanctions and climate
litigation. In the United States, dozens of lawsuits are already
proceeding against individual companies, part of a broader global
movement to push climate action into the courts to hold nations
accountable to their own promises, as well as corporations for their
damages and greenwashing. Clarity of data helps here, as it will in
any future effort to incorporate emissions into trade agreements,
too.<br>
<br>
Sunshine isn’t a simple solution or even a real disinfectant when it
comes to climate — we’ve done more damage to the planet’s future
since nearly 1,700 scientists signed a warning to humanity about it
30 years ago than in all the history of humanity that came before.
But one hopes, at least, that knowing more will be better than
knowing less, in part by making clear that warming is not the vague
result of industrial civilization in general but of the very
particular one we have built — and which we can now watch corroding
our future in real time, whatever the world’s leaders do with that
information.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/16/opinion/environment/surveillance-state-climate-change.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/16/opinion/environment/surveillance-state-climate-change.html</a>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[Looking back at show tunes -- pretty funny TV show for 2005 -
hard to find video ]</i><br>
<font size="+2"><i><b>November 20, 2005 </b></i></font> <br>
November 20, 2005: TBS airs "Earth to America," a two-hour
climate-awareness special executive-produced by Laurie David,
featuring Larry David, Bill Maher, Tom Hanks, Steve Martin and
Leonardo DiCaprio, among others.<br>
<b>TBS Presents: Earth To America</b><br>
Ben Dubin -- Sep 4, 2020<br>
November 20, 2005 Speciall<br>
497 views posted Sep 4, 2020 <br>
Aired November 20, 2005 Special<br>
Tom Hanks is the host of this show with a comic approach to raise
awareness concerning the environment.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://youtu.be/TBMy1kl6w-4">https://youtu.be/TBMy1kl6w-4</a>
video from 2005 <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/19/arts/television/19eart.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0">http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/19/arts/television/19eart.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.google.com/search?q=Earth+to+America+video&rlz=1C1SQJL_enUS792US792&oq=Earth+to+America+video&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i64.7488j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:1aa6b1f1,vid:TBMy1kl6w-4">https://www.google.com/search?q=Earth+to+America+video&rlz=1C1SQJL_enUS792US792&oq=Earth+to+America+video&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i64.7488j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:1aa6b1f1,vid:TBMy1kl6w-4</a>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>======================================= <br>
<b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is
lacking, here are a few </span>daily summaries<span
class="moz-txt-tag"> of global warming news - email delivered*</span></b>
<br>
<br>
=========================================================<br>
<b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day
or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top
headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the day,
delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting.
It also provides original reporting and commentary on climate
denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise remain
largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
<b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon
Brief Daily <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better
than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</p>
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a hobby production curated by Richard
Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</body>
</html>