<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+2"><i><b>December 7, 2022</b></i></font><br>
<br>
<i>[ keep an eye on where the money goes ]</i><br>
<b>Hurricane Ian caused the second-largest insured loss on record
after Hurricane Katrina</b><br>
PUBLISHED THU, DEC 1 2022<br>
Emma Newburger<br>
<blockquote> -- Hurricane Ian, a deadly category 4 Atlantic
hurricane that struck Florida and South Carolina earlier this
year, caused the second-largest insured loss after -- Hurricane
Katrina in 2005, according to reinsurer Swiss Re.<br>
-- Between $50 billion and 65 billion in insured damages were
recorded after Ian made landfall in western Florida in late
September with extreme winds, torrential rain and storm surge.<br>
-- “Urban development, wealth accumulation in disaster-prone
areas, inflation and climate change are key factors at play,” said
Martin Bertogg, head of catastrophe perils at Swiss Re.<br>
</blockquote>
“When Hurricane Andrew struck 30 years ago, a $20 billion loss event
had never occurred before,” Bertogg added. “Now there have been
seven such hurricanes in just the past six years.”<br>
<br>
Thierry Léger, the group’s chief underwriting officer, said that as
disasters grow more costly, demand for insurance is rising while
“the protection gap remains vast.”<br>
<br>
The insurance industry is also grappling with so-called secondary
perils, or disasters that insurers have historically labeled as high
in frequency but relatively low cost. As the climate changes, these
events are increasingly driving catastrophe insurance losses. For
instance, secondary perils like floods and hail storms caused over
$50 billion insured losses this year, according to Swiss Re.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/01/hurricane-ian-was-costliest-disaster-on-record-after-katrina-in-2005.html">https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/01/hurricane-ian-was-costliest-disaster-on-record-after-katrina-in-2005.html</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ Climate Migration - Yale Climate Connections ]</i><br>
<b>The deadly connections between climate change and migration</b><br>
People fleeing weather disasters at home face dire risks when they
attempt to walk across the U.S.-Mexico border through the Sonoran
Desert.<br>
by SARAH KENNEDY<br>
JULY 20, 2022<br>
Thousands of people have died attempting to enter the U.S. from
Mexico. And the crossing is growing even more dangerous as the
climate changes.<br>
<br>
U.S. border security policy in the Southwest is designed to deter
unauthorized migration at heavily guarded urban entry points. So
undocumented migrants with little access to water often spend days
on foot in remote areas of the sweltering Sonoran Desert, located in
the Mexican states of Sonora, Baja California, Baja California Sur,
and the U.S. states of Arizona and California.<br>
<br>
More than 7,000 migrants died during attempted southern border
crossings between 2000 and 2020, according to the U.S. Border
Control. The actual death toll is likely far higher, because some
bodies are never recovered.<br>
<br>
UCLA anthropologist Jason De León directs the Undocumented Migration
Project, a long-term study of unauthorized migration. In a recent
study, De Léon and colleagues modeled the risk of dehydration and
death during undocumented border crossings – both now and over the
next 30 years. They found that as temperatures warm and desert
conditions grow more extreme, more migrants are likely to die from
severe dehydration.<br>
<br>
Yale Climate Connections spoke with De Léon about the deadly
connections between migration and climate change.<br>
<br>
This interview has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity.<br>
<br>
Yale Climate Connections: What are the main drivers of undocumented
migration across the U.S.-Mexico border?<br>
<br>
Jason De León: The primary reasons that people attempt undocumented
migrations include poverty, political instability, violence of
different forms, famine, a devaluation of currency, and,
increasingly, climate change.<br>
<br>
You’ve got people who are fleeing places like western Mexico because
of droughts. They’re fleeing places like Honduras because of the
intensity and frequency of hurricanes that are just devastating
these places. And so you have all of these migrants who are suddenly
having to flee their home countries because of the impacts of global
warming. They’re headed towards a country like the United States,
which is largely responsible, or one of the key players, in creating
this global warming problem. And then they are trying to cross
through the Sonoran Desert of Arizona, where they are facing even
more risk as these places get hotter because of climate change. And
so these folks are being affected by climate change at multiple
points in their journey.<br>
<br>
The relationship between climate change and migration is for me, one
of the most understudied and misunderstood parts of our global
migration crisis. I think people have tended to want to separate
those two things. And if you look at just Central America in the
last couple of years, it is very, very clear that as climate change
starts to devastate these very poor countries, people are going to
start to be leaving in higher and higher numbers. And so we are now
living in a moment with climate refugees. And the United States is
going to have to deal with this moving into the future. And this is
not a problem that you can solve with the border wall. This is not a
problem that you can solve even with guest worker programs. This is
a global crisis around climate change that we need to address in
many, many different, large-scale ways to better handle this
problem.<br>
<br>
<i>Listen: Climate change is driving migration to U.S. and making it
more dangerous</i><br>
<i><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2022/05/climate-change-is-driving-migration-to-u-s-and-making-it-more-dangerous/">https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2022/05/climate-change-is-driving-migration-to-u-s-and-making-it-more-dangerous/</a></i><br>
<br>
When people see a bunch of little kids at the U.S.-Mexico border
being dropped off by their parents or by a smuggler or being carried
across the Rio Grande or through the desert with their parents,
people say, “Oh my God, I can’t believe you would ever do that to
your children.” I think the question we should be asking is, how bad
must it be in your home country for you to take those kinds of risks
with your children? When I look at that, I think, you know, things
are horrific. That is the last thing that a parent wants to do is to
put their children in danger. But these folks are having to do it
because what’s waiting for them back at home in a place like
Honduras is famine, hurricanes, political instability, rampant gang
violence. So they’re really caught between a rock and a hard place,
but they will say to you things like, “I would rather risk my life
in the Sonoran Desert of Arizona than watch my children die in San
Pedro Sula from starvation or lack of health care or because they
were shot on a street corner by some gang.” At least in the Arizona
desert, those folks will say that they’re taking some control over
their destiny.<br>
<br>
YCC: What are the greatest risks migrants face while attempting to
enter the U.S.?<br>
<br>
Jason De León: In the mid-1990s, the United States developed a
border patrol policy called Prevention Through Deterrence. And what
that policy tries to do is it fortifies urban ports of entry – so
San Diego, El Paso, the town of Nogales in southern Arizona. And it
makes it virtually impossible to cross illegally through one of
those zones because of the heavy infrastructure. There’s a lot of
agents on the ground and motion sensors and helicopters and
vehicles.<br>
<br>
Because of ramped-up security, people are walking into more and more
remote areas where it’s hard for border patrol to get to them, but
also, it’s doubling or tripling the amount of time that they’ve
spent walking in the desert. And so when I began this project in
2009, most people were walking two to three days in the desert. And
now it’s not uncommon to find someone who’s been walking out there
for almost two weeks.<br>
<br>
Now they have to walk sometimes upwards of 100 miles across vast and
treacherous terrain like the Sonoran Desert of Arizona or the South
Texas Backwoods. And the idea is that if we force those people to
try to cross through those locations, they will be deterred by the
physical cost of getting across that terrain. So in a lot of ways,
we’ve weaponized the desert as a way to slow down migration, and
it’s killed thousands of people. It’s led to the disappearance of
thousands of people. And this has been our primary security paradigm
along the U.S.-Mexico border since the mid-‘90s.<br>
<br>
And we have to keep in mind that for many decades, the primary
people coming to the United States from farther south were coming
from Mexico. But starting around a little over 10 years ago, we
really started to see an increase in folks coming from other
countries who had to cross now all of Central America and Mexico in
order to get to the United States. And so we’re talking about people
from Guatemala, El Salvador, and really right now the majority of
folks coming from Honduras as well as farther places like Cuba,
Venezuela, Africa. And so those folks now have to cross several
countries. They have to deal oftentimes with corrupt immigration
agents in various places. They are highly targeted for kidnapping,
for assault, for murder. And so now migrants not only have to cross
the Sonoran Desert of Arizona, they also have to cross this
minefield that has become Mexico.<br>
<br>
YCC: You and your colleagues studied water loss for migrants during
summer months. Why did you choose that specific risk factor? What
did you learn?<br>
<br>
Jason De León: You know, I’ve written extensively about the
experiences of border crossers: What happens to those who die in the
desert? What happens to those who disappear? But much of that has
either been sort of forensic or ethnographic – so, talking with the
families of the missing and of the deceased, or talking to living
migrants about their experiences. And we really wanted to try to
find a way to quantify the physiological impact that Prevention
Through Deterrence has on the body.<br>
<br>
I already could have told you that a lack of water is what’s going
to kill you. And it’s impossible to carry enough water. I sort of
already knew this anecdotally. But we did learn, on a more specific
level, just how quickly the body becomes dehydrated and we’re able
to really quantify the rapid speed at which people lose water.<br>
<br>
They’re facing, oftentimes, extreme heat, so they’re losing water at
a high rate and they’re not able to replenish that. And we know that
the risk of death is very, very high. And so we were interested in
really trying to quantify what water loss looks like at the level of
the body.<br>
<br>
And keep in mind that that in the models that we did, we drew a
straight line from point A to point B and said, OK, a migrant would
walk from here to there over the course of, you know, three or four
days. They would lose a lot of water. They would run out of water by
day three or day four. That’s assuming that people are walking on
the straightest path with no obstacles in their way. But what we
know is that people are taking very circuitous routes to get to a
place like Tucson, so they’re winding through the mountains and
adding days and days to their journeys. And so, they are on these
journeys with a much higher likelihood of death than what our
scenarios would even suggest.<br>
<br>
YCC: What can be done to save lives?<br>
<br>
Jason De León: It’s a great question and always the most difficult
one to answer. For me it’s a couple of different things. I think one
is we need to understand that we have a border policy in place that
weaponizes the Arizona desert and has killed thousands of people,
has disappeared thousands of people, and has physically brutalized
millions of people.<br>
<br>
So for me, one of the first big steps is to cease to use this
policy. And if people want to come here and apply for asylum, let
them do that. Let them come here legally to go through the legal
process.<br>
<br>
I think we need to improve our work visa program that allows folks
to move back and forth. And work visa programs are very tricky
because they oftentimes lead to a lot of exploitation, which is what
we had in the ‘50s and ‘60s. It ended up becoming such a problem
with abuses against guest workers that we got rid of the program
altogether. But I think we need something new that is more sensitive
and secure for those who we want to come here and work and be able
to move back and forth. I think we need to take a hard look at how
much we rely on immigrant labor in this country and recognize and
value the value that those folks give to us and treat them better.<br>
<br>
But then also, helping these countries to deal with climate change
and all the other issues that are happening in their home countries
that oftentimes the U.S. has a big hand in. So we think about
political stability in Central America: The U.S. has been
destabilizing Central America since the early 20th century. We could
think about the ways in which we have used exports and the
production of U.S. goods in places like Mexico at lower rates that
make those jobs really unsustainable for those who are trying to
make a living. I think we need to figure out how to have more equal
trade agreements, but then also helping those countries to combat
climate change as it’s happening in their countries, political
corruption, the drug war. In the drug war that’s happening in
Mexico, it’s U.S. consumers and European consumers who are the ones
who are driving that market. So it’s a lot of different things and
people often get frustrated when they ask an anthropologist how to
fix these things because it is so complicated. But I think of a big
part of it, too, is just understanding that for so long we’ve been
convinced that a border wall could solve some kind of a problem or
that immigration reform can happen exclusively at the U.S.-Mexico
border. And it’s a much bigger problem. It’s a global problem that
we need to deal with both domestically and internationally.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2022/07/the-deadly-connections-between-climate-change-and-migration/">https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2022/07/the-deadly-connections-between-climate-change-and-migration/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ blame, cause, or warning? ]</i><br>
<b>Big Tech’s toxic business model is turbo-charging the climate
crisis</b><br>
(01/12/22)<br>
<blockquote>• A new briefing paper showcases for the first time,
the full impact Big Tech has on the climate crisis.<br>
• Big Tech platforms’ “surveillance advertising” based business
model is fuelling climate change by driving emissions, driving
consumerism, driving division and driving out democracy.<br>
• Campaigners believe the climate movement cannot achieve its
aims without addressing Big Tech’s toxic business model.<br>
</blockquote>
1 December 2022 – A new briefing paper authored by barrister and
digital human rights expert Susie Alegre for environmental charity
Global Action Plan finds that the world’s biggest tech companies
such as Meta, Twitter, Google and TikTok are standing in the way of
effective climate action.<br>
<br>
The paper details how Big Tech companies are systematically
exacerbating the climate crisis by driving emissions, driving
consumerism, driving division and driving out democracy.<br>
<br>
The report outlines the enormous climate impacts of the technical
processes behind the advertising upon which platforms are almost
entirely reliant – an estimated 1% of total energy consumption on
this planet is used in the process of serving online ads. The nature
of the complex auction system behind these ads means the vast
majority of this 1% is effectively pointless, wasted energy that
leads to zero ads being placed. The effect of the ads that are seen
is profound: Purpose Disruptors recently found that advertising now
adds an estimated 32% to the carbon footprint of every person in the
UK.<br>
<br>
As well as consuming and wasting energy, online ads turbocharge
excessive consumption while ‘engagement based’ algorithms drive
division by spreading climate misinformation and disinformation,
deepening climate denial, and threatening democracy. Big Tech’s
lobbying power now outstrips the oil and gas sector and poses a
direct threat to environmental action.<br>
<br>
Each of these issues is hugely problematic. Taken together, they
demonstrate how Big Tech – and its underlying business model, built
upon surveillance advertising and recommender algorithms – is a
fundamental blocker to effective climate action. <br>
<br>
Campaigners are calling for the climate movement to join wider
efforts to tackle Big Tech’s toxic business model and curb the power
of online platforms.<br>
<blockquote>Download the report - “Big Tech’s dirty secret: How Big
Tech’s toxic business model undermines action against climate
change”
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.globalactionplan.org.uk/files/big_tech_report.pdf">https://www.globalactionplan.org.uk/files/big_tech_report.pdf</a><br>
</blockquote>
“Big Tech billionaires are the oil barons of the 21st century and
their impact on climate change is no less destructive. This paper
should serve as a wake-up call to the climate movement.” - Susie
Alegre, barrister, digital human rights expert and author of the
report.<br>
<br>
“Big Tech’s way of doing business is fundamentally at odds with
efforts to stave off the deepening climate crisis. These platforms
and their eye-watering profits rely on processing massive quantities
of data at a huge direct carbon cost. This is inseparable from the
incentives of an online advertising industry which is built on
surveillance and compulsive attention. These incentives accelerate
consumerism, but they also pollute our information environment in
ways that are even more devastating to effective climate action than
direct emissions from the sector.” - Oliver Hayes, policy &
campaigns lead at Global Action Plan.<br>
<br>
Media contact<br>
Bryony Aylmer, Communications Manager, Global Action Plan –
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bryony.aylmer@globalactionplan.org.uk">bryony.aylmer@globalactionplan.org.uk</a> - +447903812863<br>
<br>
Global Action Plan is an environmental charity focused on issues
where the connection between the health of people and our planet is
most tangible. We mobilise people and organisations to take action
on the systems that harm us and our planet.<br>
<br>
Global Action Plan convenes the ‘End Surveillance Advertising to
Kids’ coalition which is calling on the UK Government to outlaw the
practice of surveillance advertising to under 18s.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.globalactionplan.org.uk/news/big-tech-s-toxic-business-model-is-turbo-charging-the-climate-crisis">https://www.globalactionplan.org.uk/news/big-tech-s-toxic-business-model-is-turbo-charging-the-climate-crisis</a>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><i>[Cynical, old opinion, December 7th, do you know where your
historian is? ]</i><br>
<b>The Multi-Headed Super-Crisis That Will Only Get Worse</b><br>
SORRY FOR THE BAD LANGUAGE<br>
Patrick Metzger<br>
Dilettante, smartass, apocalypticist<br>
Jul 17<br>
<br>
We’re all going to get fucked and no one's buying us dinner first<br>
It’s an exciting time to be alive. Inflation soaring, markets
crashing, pandemics raging, wildfires blazing, and everything from
sriracha to tampons is vanishing from the shelves of your local
GluttonMart.<br>
<br>
This is a sub-optimal situation, not least because I like
sriracha. But what’s sub-sub-optimal, indeed downright dangerous,
is the idea that these interconnected disasters can be neatly
categorized and addressed independently.<br>
<br>
It’s this approach to problem-solving that leaves us playing
whack-a-mole with catastrophes, except the moles are on fire and
the hammer is made of cotton candy, and we’re not playing the game
so much as staring at it sullenly and complaining that it’s too
expensive.<br>
<br>
So, you’re asking, how are all these crises connected?<br>
<br>
The human-caused climate crisis<br>
I’ve written about this many times, as have more articulate,
successful doomers here on Medium (but do you also write poetry,
Umair? Jessica? You do? Never mind then.)<br>
<br>
But since each day’s news feed reveals exciting new aspects of our
planetary dumpster fire, it’s worth a few more bullet points of
disaster to hammer the point home.<br>
<br>
If you’re thinking about retiring to Scottsdale, bring bottled
water. Western America is drying up, suffering from the biggest
megadrought in 1200 years. It’s estimated that 42% of the drought
stems from climate change brought about by human greenhouse gas
emissions.<br>
<br>
Contributing to this unfortunate aridity is a series of heatwaves
that have been melting already-shoddy infrastructure across the
US. And though most Americans will be indifferent to it, Europe
and Asia are also experiencing dangerous, disastrous temperatures.<br>
<br>
Remember when woodsmoke was “Let’s roast marshmallows, Mabel!”,
not “We shouldn’t be able to smell that from here, should we?”.I’m
only going to give you one link — ok, two — about record-breaking
wildfires, but trust me, it’s fucking chaos out there.<br>
<br>
And scientists have learned that wildfires were a major
contributor to ecosystem collapse in the most comprehensive
extinction of all time. So that’s something to look forward to.<br>
<br>
Disasters are expensive, which brings us to…<br>
<br>
The economic crisis<br>
As goes the ecosystem, so goes the economy.<br>
<br>
Inflation is at a multi-decade high, and wages aren’t keeping up.
In response. central banks raise interest rates on the premise
that people have too much money to spend. This premise is
fundamentally flawed — prices aren’t rising because of excessive
demand, but because of insufficient supply.<br>
<br>
And while there are numerous reasons for that, a growing factor is
the above-mentioned global heating. Drought and flooding are
making chickpeas more expensive, and excessive heat is driving up
the price of pork in China and killing cattle in Kansas.<br>
<br>
In the big picture, global weather disasters cost USD329 billion
in 2021, money that’s no longer available to harden up our
melting, collapsing transportation and power infrastructure
against tomorrow’s heatwaves and hurricanes.<br>
<br>
Just in case you think homo sapiens sapiens might get their shit
together and work together to stave off our imminent extinction,
the best evidence suggests we’re not gonna do that, because of…<br>
<br>
The social crisis and the triumph of Dunning-Kruger<br>
Instead of science and common sense, humans, and American humans
in particular are turning to tribalism and magical thinking to
cope with current cascading crises.<br>
<br>
To right-wing media, the end of civilization is not a challenge to
be overcome, but an opportunity to keep their army of ignorati
clicking on ads from MyPillow and Applebees. The talking headcases
of Fox News and their satellite shit-slingers spew a rancid slurry
of racism, science denial, and conspiracy ideation, designed to
cow a terrified audience into supporting their own exploitation by
politicians who despise them.<br>
<br>
With the masses bread-and-circused into compliance, GOP demagogues
use their partisan courts — decades in the making!— to reshape
America into a Twilight Zone version of the 1950’s, except with
porn. The climate crisis is ignored or denied, and the economic
crisis is blamed on immigrants or a powerful, dangerous, and
wholly imaginary left.<br>
<br>
The actual, ineffectual, left, spend their days adding pronouns to
their LinkedIn profiles and enforcing diversity in Netflix period
pieces, then congratulate themselves and call it a day. Generally,
I fall into the liberal camp, or at least lurk around its
periphery sighing and looking disgruntled, but these days I find
myself unimpressed.<br>
<br>
You can’t address problems you don’t acknowledge.<br>
<br>
Where do we go from here?<br>
Without immediate and concerted action, straight off the cliff.
Studies suggest that the end of civilization could be about two
decades away.<br>
<br>
The whole planet, but especially America as the world’s most
powerful failed state, needs to overcome doctrinal differences and
follow the science on climate change. It seems more likely,
however, that President Joe Biden will mumble and sleepwalk his
way into history. That leaves the 2024 field to Trump or some
secondary sociopath who will ignore science, and use social
polarization to advance their inexplicable agenda.<br>
<br>
Even if the right could be convinced to focus on something other
than policing the sex lives and bodily autonomy of others, the
investment in clean energy, and the cost of lifestyle changes
required to avert disaster, would be enormous. People living
paycheque to paycheque in a collapsing economy can’t pony up the
cash, and the one-per-cent would rather invest in rocket ships and
hidey-holes in New Zealand.<br>
<br>
That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try, though, because it’s better to
go down in a noble effort than die of fear and apathy. We can have
conversations. We can be politically active. We can do more than
shrug and accept our fate.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://medium.com/the-bad-influence/the-multi-headed-super-crisis-that-will-only-get-worse-fa57fab93621">https://medium.com/the-bad-influence/the-multi-headed-super-crisis-that-will-only-get-worse-fa57fab93621</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[The news archive - looking back at how Ford incrementally
improves it's corporate morality ]</i><br>
<font size="+2"><i><b>December 7, 1999</b></i></font> <br>
December 7, 1999: The New York Times reports:<br>
"In a concession to environmentalists, the Ford Motor Company said
today that it would pull out of the Global Climate Coalition, a
group of big manufacturers and oil and mining companies that lobbies
against restrictions on emissions of gases linked to global warming.<br>
<br>
"Ford's decision is the latest sign of divisions within heavy
industry over how to respond to global warming. British Petroleum
and Shell pulled out of the coalition two years ago following
criticisms from environmental groups in Europe, where there has been
more public concern than in the United States. Most scientists
believe that emissions from automobiles, power plants and other
man-made sources are warming the Earth's atmosphere.<br>
<br>
"British Petroleum and Shell were so-called general, or junior,
members of the lobbying group. Ford is the first company belonging
to the board that has withdrawn, and the first American company to
leave the coalition, said Frank Maisano, a spokesman for the
coalition."<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/07/business/ford-announces-its-withdrawal-from-global-climate-coalition.html">http://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/07/business/ford-announces-its-withdrawal-from-global-climate-coalition.html</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<p>======================================= <br>
<b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is
lacking, many </span>daily summaries<span class="moz-txt-tag">
deliver global warming news - a few are email delivered*</span></b>
<br>
<br>
=========================================================<br>
<b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day
or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top
headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the day,
delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting.
It also provides original reporting and commentary on climate
denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise remain
largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
<b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon
Brief Daily </b><span class="moz-txt-star"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better
than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</p>
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender. This is a personal hobby production curated by Richard Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</body>
</html>