<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+2"><i><b>December 27, 2022</b></i></font><br>
<br>
<i>[ BBC has a summary - video news 4 min ]</i><br>
<b>US winter storm traps New York State residents in cars - BBC News</b><br>
BBC News 13.6M subscribers<br>
28,520 views Dec 27, 2022 #US #BBCNews<br>
At least 27 people have died in Buffalo, a city in upstate New York,
as a monster storm continues to batter the US. <br>
<br>
US President Joe Biden has approved an emergency declaration
allowing federal support for the state, which has been the worst
affected area. <br>
<br>
Some people have been trapped in their cars for more than two days,
a state official said. <br>
<br>
At least 60 people are known to have been killed in the storm, which
has stretched from Canada to Mexico. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jC6lRMEydro"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jC6lRMEydro</a><br>
<p>- -</p>
<i>[ longer report in PBS news hour - YouTube video ]</i><br>
<b>PBS NewsHour full episode, Dec. 26, 2022</b><br>
Dec 26, 2022 <br>
Monday on the News Hour, parts of the country try to dig out of a
massive winter storm that has led to dozens of deaths, widespread
power outages and travel delays...<br>
WATCH TODAY’S SEGMENT: Brutal winter storm paralyzes parts of U.S.
with 50 dead<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT7HiuWHimk&t=0s">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT7HiuWHimk&t=0s</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ E&E News ClimateWire ]</i><br>
<b>Climate misinformation spreads on Musk’s Twitter</b><br>
By Scott Waldman | 12/23/2022 <br>
At Tesla, Elon Musk helped kick-start an electric vehicle revolution
that will meaningfully cut greenhouse gas emissions. Now, as
Twitter’s CEO, he’s overseeing one of the world’s most popular
social media platforms that’s rife with climate change
misinformation.<br>
<br>
And it appears to be getting worse.<br>
<br>
Since Musk’s purchase of Twitter two months ago, some prominent
climate deniers have returned to the platform after being banned for
pushing misinformation about the Covid-19 pandemic. There also are
signs that scientists have left Twitter after their posts depicting
global warming research were swarmed by critics.<br>
<br>
Among the changes potentially driven by Musk’s effort to tear down
barriers that once prohibited figures like former President Donald
Trump from spreading election lies are a rise in the popularity of
tweets that claim climate change is a scam. Some recent posts have
earned 40,000 likes.<br>
<br>
Marc Morano, who runs a blog that routinely attacks climate science,
said that since Musk bought Twitter the appearance of his name in
climate search results “appear to be juiced by the new algorithms.”<br>
<br>
“My Twitter account and many others opposing the ‘consensus’ climate
view have all increased visibility dramatically since Musk took over
Twitter,” he said in an interview. “Whatever Musk is altering, I
hope he keeps it up.”<br>
<br>
Indeed, the number of tweets rejecting climate science have never
been higher than in 2022, according to research by the University of
London conducted on behalf of The Times newspaper. There have been
more than 850,000 climate denial tweets or retweets so far this
year. There were 650,000 such messages in 2021 and 220,000 in 2020,
the analysis found.<br>
<br>
Musk has said he will sell the blue check marks that Twitter uses to
verify account holders to anyone who pays $8 a month. Users who pay
the fee will see their posts “rocket to the top of replies, mentions
and search,” according to Twitter. That could also mean that
scientists who refuse to pay the monthly fee could see their posts
lose visibility...<br>
- -<br>
<b>‘Climate is a scam’</b><br>
A few weeks after Musk bought Twitter on Oct. 27 for $44 billion,
the company eliminated a policy that cracked down on Covid-19
misinformation. Some scientists, including Mann, said the policy
also limited inaccurate climate narratives.<br>
<br>
“That was a clear message that it’s open season on twitter for the
promotion of anti-science, and clearly we’ve seen an escalation in
climate denial rhetoric,” Mann said of the policy’s withdrawal.<br>
<br>
Scientists concluded decades ago that humans are warming the planet
at an unprecedented pace through the burning of fossil fuels. A
movement to dilute those findings has been funded in part by energy
companies and linked to conservative politics in the U.S. and other
countries. Twitter is a key platform for spreading that type of
false information.<br>
In April, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its
sixth assessment report and found that effective communication of
climate science has been significantly damaged by the spread of
false claims on social media.<br>
<br>
“Accurate transference of the climate science has been undermined
significantly by climate change countermovements, in both legacy and
new/social media environments through misinformation,” the report
stated.<br>
<br>
That same month, Twitter banned paid ads that promote climate
denial.<br>
- -<br>
Since July, months before Musk bought Twitter, there was an uptick
in content referring to “#ClimateScam,” “climate scam,” or “climate
is a scam,” totaling more than 500,000 mentions, according to a
report released last month by Climate Action Against Disinformation,
an international coalition of environmental groups. The messages
originated from about 150,000 accounts and spiked around the time
that global climate talks began in Egypt last month, the report
found.<br>
<br>
Researchers found one account, @climate_fact, that was responsible
for more than 50,000 tweets. Every few minutes, it retweeted posts
that use “#climatescam,” “#greatreset” and other phrases. It’s
unclear who runs the account or where they are located.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.eenews.net/articles/climate-misinformation-spreads-on-musks-twitter/"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.eenews.net/articles/climate-misinformation-spreads-on-musks-twitter/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><i>[ Inside Climate News ]</i></p>
<b>Oil Companies Had a Problem With ExxonMobil’s Industry-Wide
Carbon Capture Proposal: Exxon’s Bad Reputation</b><br>
Documents show Shell initially resisted working with Exxon on the
Houston project and believed Chevron had doubts, too. Both companies
eventually signed on.<br>
By Nicholas Kusnetz<br>
December 21, 2022<br>
ExxonMobil has been the prime target of activists and politicians
angered by the oil industry’s efforts to block action on climate
change. Now, newly disclosed documents confirm that the oil
company’s reputational woes have extended into the industry itself
and threatened to derail Exxon’s biggest climate proposal to date.<br>
<br>
Last year, Exxon struggled to gain support from its peers when it
proposed a cross-industry effort to build a carbon capture and
storage hub in Houston, according to documents released by the House
Committee on Oversight and Reform, which has been investigating the
oil industry. Top executives at Shell, in particular, worried that
joining with Exxon would present an “unacceptable risk” to the
European oil major’s reputation.<br>
<br>
“I am not interested in participating with any advocacy effort led
by” Exxon, wrote Krista Johnson, Shell’s head of U.S. government
relations, in a July 2021 email to Gretchen Watkins, president of
Shell USA. Johnson said their competitor was continuing to draw
negative headlines and that “zero companies” were prepared to join
an Exxon-led consortium at that time.<br>
A month later, Watkins said she opposed any public participation
with Exxon. “Their reputation is severely damaged here,” she wrote
to colleagues in the Netherlands, where Shell was headquartered at
the time, “and we will only do harm to the strength of Shell’s US
reputation.” (Shell later moved its headquarters to London.)...<br>
- -<br>
Funk also said Chevron viewed Exxon’s claims about how much carbon
dioxide the project could capture, and how many jobs it could
create, as “inflated—but harmless inflation.”<br>
<br>
Chevron and Shell declined to comment for this article...<br>
- -<br>
Todd Spitler, an Exxon spokesman, declined to comment on Shell’s
internal discussions, but said in an email that “The House Oversight
Committee report has sought to misrepresent ExxonMobil’s position on
climate science, and its support for effective policy solutions, by
recasting well intended, internal policy debates as an attempted
company disinformation campaign.” He added, “Our CEO has testified
under oath on this subject during two all-day Congressional hearings
before two separate committees, we’ve been in regular communication
with the committee for over a year, and have provided staff with
more than one million pages of documents, including board materials
and internal communications.”<br>
<br>
Beyond the drama between companies, the documents released by the
committee also shed light on the oil industry’s sustained efforts to
promote carbon capture and storage. For years, the documents show,
companies saw the technology as a means of enabling continued fossil
fuel consumption, even as the world’s transition to cleaner energy
grew more urgent. But the only way carbon capture could succeed, the
companies said, was by winning substantial government funding and
public support.<br>
<br>
In 2016, for example, a Princeton University program that is
sponsored by BP sent the company advice on how to address climate
change. One of the recommendations was to “Understand the potential
for CCS,” or carbon capture and storage, “to enable the full use of
fossil fuels across the energy transition and beyond.”<br>
<br>
A 2017 Shell document titled “US Gulf Coast CCS Opportunity Framing”
said “the window for CCS to remain relevant with governments and
society is closing quickly,” and that action was needed within a
decade. “The value of CCS to Shell is the ability to decarbonize our
products, retain a larger market share for our products in the
energy transition, in addition to reputational value,” it said.<br>
<br>
Two years later, a note to Shell’s executive committee said carbon
capture in the United States faced “economic challenges,” but that
the company would continue to pursue a Gulf Coast project because of
the possibility of future incentives and the “potential need for CCS
on critical Shell projects.”<br>
<br>
The documents also include a 2018 update on a National Petroleum
Council report about carbon capture and storage, written by John
Mingé, a former chief of BP America who led the petroleum council
study. In addition to lowering emissions, the document said, wide
deployment of carbon capture technology could help increase U.S. oil
production, secure the export of fossil fuels to countries with
stringent climate policies and allow for continued use of “existing
infrastructure over the long term.”<br>
<br>
Mingé’s update recommended “simplifying the narrative” about carbon
capture, as part of an effort to win support for the technology
across academia, environmental groups, governments and the financial
sector.<br>
<br>
The petroleum council report, published in December 2019, went on to
become a foundational document for the industry’s lobbying over the
last two years. Over that period, Congress and the Biden
administration have allocated more money to carbon capture than any
other government in history.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/21122022/big-oil-exxon-reputation-carbon-capture"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://insideclimatenews.org/news/21122022/big-oil-exxon-reputation-carbon-capture</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ "Water, water everywhere..." video ] </i><br>
<b>How This Billionaire Couple STOLE California's Water Supply | The
Class Room ft. @SecondThought</b><br>
More Perfect Union<b><br>
</b>99,072 views Dec 20, 2022<br>
While 40 million Californians suffer through unprecedented drought,
one billionaire couple owns a massive share of the state's water
system, largely seized in a series of secretive meetings two decades
ago.<br>
<br>
That system was largely paid for by the very taxpayers whose water
these billionaires hold hostage. The Resnicks are the biggest
farmers in California–as of 2007 they owned four San Francisco’s
worth of farmland. Nearly half of Americans buy at least one of
their products: pistachios, POM pomegranate juice, mandarins,
flowers, and more. <br>
<br>
It’s all under one massive umbrella: The Wonderful Company, a
privately owned company worth at least 5 billion dollars. The
majority owners, the Resnicks, are worth at least 8 billion. <br>
<br>
We dug into how Lynda and Stewart Resnick were able to seize control
of what should be a shared public resource with @SecondThought on
this latest episode of "How They Got Rich" by The Class Room at More
Perfect Union.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4B19qb1Az94"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4B19qb1Az94</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ video - China Uncensored - critical opinion show <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://youtu.be/_zcA3rtywXQ" moz-do-not-send="true">https://youtu.be/_zcA3rtywXQ</a>]</i><br>
<b>“Woke” Investors Funding China’s Human Rights Abuses</b><br>
China Uncensored<br>
1.85M subscribers<br>
25,262 views Dec 26, 2022 #China<br>
There has been a big movement in the investment world to screen
investments based on environmental, social and governance (ESG)
criteria. While it's good investors that care about the impact of
their investments, what's not good is that those same "woke"
investors are funding China's human rights abuses and environmental
destruction. In this episode of China Uncensored, we look at the
"responsible" investing strategy of some large investment funds,
what Chinese companies those funds are invested in, and why those
companies are bad investments for anyone who cares about ESG.<br>
<br>
<i>[7 years ago] </i>20 Signs China's Pollution Has Reached
Apocalyptic Levels | China Uncensored<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwOBRH56Ic0&t=0s"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwOBRH56Ic0&t=0s</a><br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zcA3rtywXQ"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zcA3rtywXQ</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<i>[ how video games might save the future ]</i><br>
<b>Climate Activism and Attitudes in Videogaming</b><br>
On December 9th, 2022, the Yale Center for Environmental
Communication hosted a panel with Marina Psaros, head of
sustainability at Unity Technologies; Deborah Mensah-Bonsu, founder
of Games for Good; and Dr. Jennifer Carman, Deputy Research Manager
at the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication on videogaming
and climate change. The discussion centered on the ways in which
digital games can be utilized for large-scale social change in
relation to our recent report of video gamers’ opinions on global
warming. Dr. Lynn Fiellin, Professor of Medicine at the Yale School
of Medicine, the Yale Child Study Center, and the Yale School of
Public Health, moderated the panel.<br>
<b>Key Takeaways include:</b><br>
<blockquote>-- The gaming community is more than its stereotypes:
its demographics reflect the United States’ and videogamers hold
similar attitudes toward climate change.<br>
--Videogamers are more willing to engage in behaviors to combat
global warming than the general U.S. public and therefore
represent a critical and untapped resource for climate action.<br>
--There are existing and developing strategies for “saving the
world” with games: Expand the definition of “green games.”Blend
in-game and real world experiences through augmented reality to
generate interest in specific actions and/or offering in-game
rewards for real-world actions. This can additionally be used to
collect citizen-sourced data from around the world that can be
used by an international research community.<br>
--Reduce the carbon footprint of games themselves, particularly
through scope 3 emission reductions.<br>
--Videogamers are generally receptive to climate change-specific
content in games and from well-known gamers.<br>
--Games for Good found that a large majority of videogamers
appreciate the importance of gaming as an environmental
educational tool and welcome environmental content in the games
they play, with the important caveat that the content needs to fit
the overarching storyline of the game.<br>
--Prominent players (i.e. “trusted messengers”) in the videogaming
community can and have been successfully using their prominence to
push for change.<br>
--The International Game Developers Association Climate Special
Interest Group (IGDA CLIMATE SIG) is a gathering space for this
type of work.<br>
--There are many ways videogamers can advocate for change within
their community.<br>
-- It is important both that influencers talk about these issues
to their followers and that gamers talk to their friends and
family about climate topics.<br>
--To reduce electricity consumption, gamers can look into powering
their home or their gaming technology with renewable energy; they
can also set their devices to efficiency modes (on consoles,
in-game settings, power strips, and more).<br>
--To reduce waste, gamers can keep their consoles and other
technology as long as possible. --However, the responsibility also
lies with developers to not require new technologies to play a
game.<br>
--Younger gamers are part of a generation that has been especially
active in drawing attention to racial and social injustices,
mental health issues, and climate change. There are great
opportunities for these voices to be uplifted within the gaming
community to promote action instead of overwhelmed inaction.<br>
</blockquote>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/news-events/climate-activism-and-attitudes-in-videogaming/"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/news-events/climate-activism-and-attitudes-in-videogaming/</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[ forty videos from the International Centre for Thoreticcal
Sciences - high geek facttor ]</i><br>
<b>TIPPING POINTS IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS (HYBRID, 2022)</b><br>
International Centre for Theoretical Sciences<br>
40 videos updated on Nov 8, 2022<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL04QVxpjcnjgKhQr3ma2XIoRQt5u_YCDD"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL04QVxpjcnjgKhQr3ma2XIoRQt5u_YCDD</a><br>
- -<br>
<i>[ one of 40 advanced academic lectures - a bit tedious -
academic ]</i><br>
<b>Critical rates of climate warming and abrupt collapse of
ecosystems by Taranjot Kaur</b><br>
International Centre for Theoretical Sciences<br>
Oct 10, 2022 TIPPING POINTS IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS (HYBRID, 2022)<br>
PROGRAM<br>
TIPPING POINTS IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS (HYBRID)<br>
<br>
ORGANIZERS: Partha Sharathi Dutta (IIT Ropar, India), Vishwesha
Guttal (IISc, India), Mohit Kumar Jolly (IISc, India) and Sudipta
Kumar Sinha (IIT Ropar, India)<br>
DATE: 19 September 2022 to 30 September 2022<br>
VENUE: Ramanujan Lecture Hall and Online<br>
<br>
Complex systems are seen across various branches of science;
examples include climatic systems, financial markets, systems
biology, and ecosystems. Many new techniques have emerged for
understanding the dynamics of complex systems and predicting their
long-term behavior, which are often obscured by apparent randomness
and disorder. Nevertheless, these systems can undergo abrupt, large,
and often irreversible changes to the system's state that have
wide-ranging implications. When a dynamical system is tipped to a
contrasting state in a relatively short period under the influence
of small stochastic perturbations; this phenomenon is called a
critical-transition or tipping. In the last two decades there are
significant developments in the studies of tipping. This workshop
will cover all the three major types of tipping; B-tipping,
N-tipping and R-tipping, and will also discuss the recent advances
on tipping point research including the application of machine
learning.<br>
<br>
The meeting aims to bring together ecologists, climate scientists,
and dynamical system theorists, or in related fields who have
contributed substantially to the field for catalyzing constructive
discussions that can lead to further advancements of this subject
and identify exciting and unexplored areas.<br>
CONTACT US: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:tipc@icts.res.in"
moz-do-not-send="true">tipc@icts.res.in</a><br>
PROGRAM LINK: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.icts.res.in/program/tipc2022"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.icts.res.in/program/tipc2022</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoRlD7-ijDc"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoRlD7-ijDc</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<i>[The news archive - looking back]</i><br>
<font size="+2"><i><b>December 27, 2014</b></i></font> <br>
December 27, 2014:<br>
• The New York Times reports:<br>
"In state legislatures and major professional associations, a
bipartisan effort is emerging to change the way state attorneys
general interact with lobbyists, campaign donors and other corporate
representatives.<br>
<br>
"This month, during a closed-door meeting of the National
Association of Attorneys General, officials voted to stop accepting
corporate sponsorships. In Missouri, a bill has been introduced that
would require the attorney general, as well as certain other state
officials, to disclose within 48 hours any political contribution
worth more than $500. And in Washington State, legislation is being
drafted to bar attorneys general who leave office from lobbying
their former colleagues for a year.<br>
<br>
"Perhaps most significant, a White House ethics lawyer in the
administration of George W. Bush has asked the American Bar
Association to change its national code of conduct to prohibit
attorneys general from discussing continuing investigations or other
official matters while participating in fund-raising events at
resort destinations, as they often now do. Those measures could be
adopted in individual states. <br>
<br>
"The actions follow a series of articles in The New York Times that
examined how lawyers and lobbyists — from major corporations, energy
companies and even plaintiffs’ law firms — have increasingly tried
to influence state attorneys general."<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/27/us/bipartisan-effort-to-restrict-lobbyists-influence-of-attorneys-general.html"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/27/us/bipartisan-effort-to-restrict-lobbyists-influence-of-attorneys-general.html</a><br>
<br>
<p>======================================= <br>
<b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is
lacking, many </span>daily summaries<span class="moz-txt-tag">
deliver global warming news - a few are email delivered*</span></b>
<br>
<br>
=========================================================<br>
<b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day
or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top
headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/" moz-do-not-send="true">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a> <br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the day,
delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant reporting.
It also provides original reporting and commentary on climate
denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise remain
largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
<b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon
Brief Daily </b><span class="moz-txt-star"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days. Better
than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</p>
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"
moz-do-not-send="true"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not carry
images or attachments which may originate from remote servers. A
text-only message can provide greater privacy to the receiver and
sender. This is a personal hobby production curated by Richard Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">contact@theclimate.vote</a> <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote" moz-do-not-send="true"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://TheClimate.Vote</a> <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"
moz-do-not-send="true"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</body>
</html>