<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b>February 26, 2023</b></i></font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Drilled, where are the climate
journalists? ] </i><br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>Massive Media Cuts = Less Climate
Coverage</b><br>
</font><font face="Calibri">FEB 25, 2023</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><i> </i>Climate Coverage Roundup </font><br>
<font face="Calibri">If you don't work in media, you might have
missed the steady drumbeat of layoff announcements from various
newsrooms over the past six months or so. With 100 layoffs here,
20 there, they have also been overshadowed by the thousands of
jobs cut from the tech industry. But there are way fewer reporters
than there are tech workers, and the steady loss of them is going
to eventually mean a decline in climate reporting and particularly
a decline in the most time-consuming and expensive type of
reporting: investigative journalism, which also tends to be the
one with the best shot at actually catalyzing change.<br>
<br>
Late last year, CNN, BuzzFeed, Gannett, and Vice announced
layoffs. News in particular saw a massive 20 percent spike in job
cuts from 2021 to 2022. Now, just two months into 2023, Vox,
Adweek, NBC News, and MSNBC have announced major cuts. This week
NPR joined the wave, announcing a 10% reduction in its workforce
(around 100 positions) and a hiring freeze. The Washington Post
started bracing for layoffs in December, and they have now
officially begun.<br>
<br>
At the same time, all those great climate reporting initiatives
that were announced in late 2021 and early 2022 seem to have
mostly resulted in a handful of essays, opinion pieces, and
newsletters. Nothing against any of those, but they don't tend to
be the pieces that arm senators with the documents or context they
need to argue for substantial policy change.<br>
<br>
What does all this mean for climate coverage? So far, a lot of
climate reporters have survived the cuts. That's great news. But
at the same time that newsrooms are losing staff, disinformation
just keeps gaining steam. Plus those remaining reporters are now
working with editors who are being tasked with twice the work in
the same amount of time. I've seen the difference myself, starting
about the middle of last year: it takes longer to get a green
light on a story, longer to get an edit back, longer to get a
story published. And there are fewer outlets these days too. In
addition to the layoffs, the past 12 months have brought quite a
few announcements of outlets shutting down altogether. Protocol,
the tech arm of Politico, which was starting to do some great
climate reporting under the steady hand of former Earther editor
Brian Kahn, suddenly anounced its departure last fall. Around the
same time, The Washington Post shut down its magazine and laid off
the entire staff.<br>
<br>
It's also telling that the media industry, like most other
industries, is seeing a union boom. The jobs that remain pay less
than they ever have, for an increasing amount of work. It's not
unusual to see salaries and hourly wages for reporters that are
lower than what I've seen posted for cashiers at fast-food
restaurants. And a huge number of outlets have continued the
long-standing shift towards using more contract labor, making
these jobs as unstable as they have ever been.<br>
<br>
Meanwhile, every month or so I hear from an "investigator" working
for a team within an NGO. A team with more funding and stability
than any newsroom in the world, but also with a very specific
mandate that's usually not just informing the public. Now look, NO
ONE is saying that mainstream media in particular is some
bias-free utopia with no influence or agenda. The corporate hold
over media in the U.S. in particular has been well documented
(yes, I've read Ben Bagdikian and Manufacturing Consent!). But I
don't know that the solution is to let NGOs take over
investigative journalism entirely. Encouraging journalists to get
comfortable with simply being fed scoops—whether they're coming
from corporations or organizations funded by wealthy
philanthropists—feels like a dangerous path, not just for climate
reporting, but for democracy in general.<br>
<br>
If it continues to be relatively easy to use the media as a tool,
no matter who's doing the using, who exactly does that benefit?
Probably not the public. So...what's the solution? I don't know!
But it seems increasingly obvious to me that we really need to
grapple with the business model of media and the role it plays in
society to have any hope of tackling the climate crisis.<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.drilledpodcast.com/massive-media-cuts-less-climate-coverage/">https://www.drilledpodcast.com/massive-media-cuts-less-climate-coverage/</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri"> <i>[ VP to face the issue ]</i></font><br>
<b>SpaceX, Amazon, US space industry to talk climate change with VP
Kamala Harris (exclusive)</b><br>
By Elizabeth Howell <br>
2-24-2024<br>
Climate change will be raised with VP Kamala Harris after the debut
meeting of a group advising the Harris-run National Space Council on
government policy direction<br>
US Vice-President Kamala Harris will speak with big space companies
today (Feb. 23) about addressing climate change through space
technologies, along with other administration priorities.<br>
<br>
In the coming months, SpaceX, Amazon and other private, non-profit,
or educational organizations making up the National Space Council's
(NSpC) users' advisory group(opens in new tab) will discuss
priorities like climate change and economic opportunity for jobs to
support the fight against global warming, a White House official
told Space.com exclusively. (Harris is chair of the NSpC as well,
and will talk with representatives of the users' advisory group
after their debut meeting today.)<br>
<br>
Not all members of the users' advisory group were at the first
meeting Thursday (Feb. 23), however. SpaceX was not in attendance. A
representative from Amazon was, but left before meeting with the
Vice-President. Member companies that were there throughout included
Boeing, Blue Origin and Lockheed Martin, while representatives from
other sectors were in attendance, such as a teacher, the White House
background briefing said...<br>
- -<br>
While the discussions are early-stage and the results will come
after the users' advisory group has its say, Chirag Parikh, the
NSpC's executive secretary, told Space.com that one large goal would
be to make sense of the amount of data collected by satellites and
other Earth observation systems to address issues. <br>
<br>
"We have this enormity of data that's collected in space. What's the
best way to be able to coordinate that information?" asked Parikh,
who is also deputy assistant to President Joe Biden.<br>
<br>
"What's the best way to be able to make that information
accessible—not just to the climate researchers, which are incredibly
important people around the world—but also state and local
governments, to communities, to urban planners. so they can actually
make that information accessible and usable," he added...<br>
- -<br>
The discussions are part of the Biden administration's larger push
to address climate change and other ways in which space technology
can benefit Earth, according to background information provided by
the White House. The meeting also aims to build on past discussions
by the NSpC, which has also focused on how to bring the benefits of
space infrastructure to more people, the White House says.<br>
<br>
More generally, the users' advisory group aims to recommend actions
to the Harris-led NSpC concerning space policy and strategy and to
align corporate activities with government policies. Climate change,
however, is among the Biden administration's priorities.<br>
<br>
The administration has a goal of reaching "net zero" in United
States carbon emissions no later than 2050, and reducing greenhouse
gas emissions by as much as 52% by 2030. Harris, as NSpC chair, has
been discussing international agreements to address climate change
with leaders around the world...<br>
- -<br>
Twinned with this climate push is a desire by the Biden
administration to create new kinds of jobs and opportunities in the
space sector, opening up participation to a larger segment of the US
population. Amazon and SpaceX are among the signatories to a
September 2022 agreement among several companies, announced by
Harris and her office, to provide training for community college
students in space tech.<br>
<br>
At the time, the Vice-President's office said their goal is to
increase diversity and require less training to participate in the
space sector, which typically attracts graduates from the Ivy League
or highly expensive technical or engineering schools.<br>
<br>
The NSpC users' advisory group has six subcommittees, including one
focused on science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) and
potential workforce opportunities, the White House background
briefing told Space.com.<br>
<br>
The Space.com briefing indicated one goal of the NSpC is to partner
closely with industry to grow the workforce in targeted areas like
electricians and welding, which have high demand, in concert with
the US Department of Labor's national apprenticeship
accelerator(opens in new tab) program that aims to start people in
the workforce swiftly...<br>
- - <br>
To be sure, space launches are a contributor to climate change, but
private industry is also looking for ways to offset that through
offering tech like precision mapping (which allows vehicles like
planes or tractors to map out better routes, to reduce emissions) or
purchasing renewable energy. <br>
<br>
For example, Amazon purchased 6.5 gigawatts of renewable electricity
production capacity as of 2020(opens in new tab), or the equivalent
amount of energy to supply 1.7 million US households.<br>
<br>
The White House briefing acknowledged that the space economy is
fast-growing and also encompasses numerous sectors, including civil,
defense, intelligence and commercial, some of which is backed by
lucrative venture investment.<br>
<br>
The US government is also seeking to bring in more voices among its
departments, with roughly 14 departments and agencies collaborating
with senior officials inside the White House on space issues, the
briefing indicated to Space.com. <br>
<br>
An example is the Department of Commerce, which works with other
government entities on matters ranging from space traffic management
(there are more satellites in space than ever, leading to worries
about space debris or signal interference) to how space satellites
can monitor the effects of climate and weather on infrastructure.<br>
<br>
The goal of the users' advisory group, however, is to provide more
perspectives outside of government, to help inform the Biden
administration's approach to space issues, the White House
background briefing added.<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.space.com/vice-president-kamala-harris-spacex-amazon-climate-change">https://www.space.com/vice-president-kamala-harris-spacex-amazon-climate-change</a><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Human climate refugees - book review ]</i><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><b>'The Great Displacement' looks at
communities forever altered by climate change</b><br>
February 24, 20235:00 AM ET<br>
MICHAEL SCHAUB<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">The climate crisis doesn't care if your state
is red or blue," President Joe Biden said in his State of the
Union address earlier this month. "It is an existential threat. We
have an obligation to our children and grandchildren to confront
it."<br>
<br>
Scientists have been saying the same for decades, although that
hasn't stopped the issue of climate change from becoming a
political football, with self-styled skeptics waving away the data
that show rising temperatures and sea levels, melting glaciers,
and increasingly severe droughts.<br>
<br>
Climate change is reshaping the U.S. in another way, as journalist
Jake Bittle explains in his new book, The Great Displacement:
"Each passing year brings disasters that disfigure new parts of
the United States, and these disasters alter the course of human
lives, pushing people from one place to another, destroying old
communities and forcing new ones to emerge."<br>
<br>
Bittle's book takes a look at several communities that have been
affected by climate change, and how the lives of their residents —
the ones who have survived — have been altered by extreme weather.
The first section of the book focuses on the Florida Keys, "the
first flock of canaries in the coal mine of climate change."
Bittle profiles Patrick Garvey, who bought a neglected grove on
Big Pine Key, and fixed it up into "a bona fide community
resource" that grew fruits rare in the continental U.S.: longans,
jackfruits, soursops</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Then came Hurricane Irma. Patrick and some
friends decided to stay on the island during the 2017 storm, and
ended up sheltering at a nearby school. They survived — a dozen
people in the Keys didn't — but the grove wasn't as lucky. When
Patrick returned after the storm passed, he found "tree stumps
scattered across the grass at random intervals, wood and metal
strewn around like bird feed."<br>
<br>
Patrick's story is a harrowing one, and although he was fortunate
to survive Irma alive, Bittle strikes a pessimistic note about the
future of the Keys' ability to sustain human life. "Many of the
islands in the archipelago, perhaps all of them, could go
underwater altogether by the end of this century," he writes.
"More so than almost any other place in the United States, they
are doomed." Some Keys residents decided to stay after Irma;
others, unable to bear the thought of going through that kind of
trauma again, left.<br>
<br>
Hurricanes aren't the only weather phenomena that climate change
has made more frequent. In another section of the book, Bittle
turns his eye to California's wine country. Just about a month
after Irma ravaged the Caribbean and Florida, a fire broke out in
the town of Calistoga; a combination of high winds and drought
caused the fire to turn into a conflagration that quickly reached
the city of Santa Rosa.<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Vicki and Mark Carrino were among the Santa
Rosa residents whose lives were thrown into disarray by the Tubbs
Fire, named after a street near where it started. The couple was
asleep when their daughter called them, urgently warning them to
evacuate; they did, and less than ten minutes later, the firestorm
engulfed their home, destroying it. They were able and willing to
rebuild their home in the wake of the fire, but many of their
neighbors weren't, leaving their subdivision feeling "downright
lonely, even almost abandoned."<br>
<br>
Bittle takes a deep dive into the factors that go into people's
decisions to stay or to leave once their neighborhoods have been
affected by climate change. In California, it's the affordable
housing crisis plus the increased fire risk that has led to many
residents moving to Nampa, Idaho; in other parts of the country,
rising insurance premiums and weather risks have forced people to
relocate elsewhere, including cities like Buffalo, New York, and
Dallas, Texas. "In the United States alone," Bittle writes, "at
least twenty million people may move as a result of climate
change, more than twice as many as moved during the entire span of
the Great Migration."<br>
<br>
Bittle covers the people whose lives have been altered by climate
change — from drought in Arizona to coastal erosion in the bayous
of south Louisiana — with real compassion, explaining why economic
inequality makes many people unable to relocate, even if it were
easy for them to simply pack up and leave the places where they've
spent their whole lives behind.<br>
<br>
He's an empathetic writer, but also one with a real gift for
explaining the fraught issues — economic, scientific, political —
that make the climate crisis and its effect on the population so
complex. It sometimes feels too pat to call a book "necessary,"
but this one really is.<br>
<br>
The Great Displacement is a fascinating look at how America has
changed, and will continue to change, as climate change wreaks
havoc on the nation and the people who live there. Bittle ends the
book on a hopeful note, but still recognizes the extent of the
damage already done: "When a community disappears, so does a map
that orients us in the world."<br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.npr.org/2023/02/24/1158940219/jake-bittle-the-great-displacement-communities-people-and-climate-change">https://www.npr.org/2023/02/24/1158940219/jake-bittle-the-great-displacement-communities-people-and-climate-change</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ Cocaine Bear was a real bear, is now a
real movie - consensus is a must see - and it relates to climate
]</i><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><b>The Case for Cocaine Bears</b><br>
Maybe a deadly beast hopped up on nose candy is exactly what the
environmental movement needs.<br>
BY TYLER AUSTIN HARPER<br>
FEB 24, 2023...</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">- -</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Yet, what is most compelling about this lowbrow
blockbuster is not its titular bear-on-blow rampaging through the
Georgia wilds. What is most interesting about the film is its
off-kilter environmentalism. Elizabeth Banks, Cocaine Bear’s
director, has insisted that her seemingly unserious film is about
humanity’s hubristic desire to dominate its environment. “If you
fuck with nature, nature will fuck with you,” she summarizes. This
ecological angle might surprise viewers who came to the theaters
lured by the promise of a black bear hopped up on nose candy and
raising hell...<br>
</font><font face="Calibri">- -</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Recognizing this kind of environmental despair
in herself and among her own students, Nicole Seymour—an
environmentalist and English professor at California State
University—has asked a provocative question: If pious messaging
doesn’t inspire change, what if environmentalism might “work”
better by becoming more irreverent? More ribald and less
self-righteous? Silly rather than somber? More about giggles than
guilt? Seymour calls this cheeky posture “bad environmentalism,”
which she defines as “environmentalism with the ‘wrong’ attitude—
without reverence or seriousness—and while also having a sense of
humor about oneself.” It is an attitude that Cocaine Bear is shot
through with...<br>
</font><font face="Calibri">- -</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Yet, though the film is often grotesquely
violent, there is also a weird kind of consolation in its
bloodlust. If the bear is a metaphor for our current climate
crisis—the murderous embodiment of nature out of control, fueled
up on human abuse—I found myself drawing some small measure of
comfort from its conclusion. The bear lives. So do some of the
people. Life goes on and the sun rises. Of course, there is
nothing especially nuanced to any of that. The whole of the film
is predicated on a sort of tautology: Cocaine Bear works because
there is a bear on cocaine. But there is also a pure and uncut
delight in watching a vaguely green film that is neither
obnoxiously sermonizing nor unremittingly depressing. Cocaine Bear
is bad environmentalism at its finest, cranked up to 11 and
rolling in the devil’s dandruff. And there is value in that...<br>
</font><font face="Calibri">- -</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">In this sense, it may be beside the point
whether or not Elizabeth Banks’ film about a black bear who rides
the white lightning is quality “cinema.” (The inevitable “is this
a good bad movie or a bad bad movie?” debate has already started).
Ultimately, Banks’ film may prove too polished to enter the
pantheon of other preposterous cult classics—like Sharknado or The
Room—whose creators straddle a delicate line between inept and
idiot savant. Likewise, I would not go so far as to suggest that
Cocaine Bear makes for game-changing environmental propaganda: I
do not imagine most audience members will come away from the film
with an awakened ecological consciousness. But in an atmosphere in
which it is all too easy to feel suffocated by climate anxiety,
Elizabeth Banks’ film cuts through our ecological malaise. And
when you’re that worn down, who couldn’t use a little pick-me-up?<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://slate.com/culture/2023/02/cocaine-bear-movie-review-elizabeth-banks-climate-change.html">https://slate.com/culture/2023/02/cocaine-bear-movie-review-elizabeth-banks-climate-change.html</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri">- -</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[ really, you mean this is based on a true
event and a real bear? ]</i><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><b>They’re Making a Movie About the
Cocaine Bear! Wait, What?</b><br>
Here is the true story of the cocaine bear.<br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://slate.com/culture/2021/03/cocaine-bear-elizabeth-banks-lord-miller-warden-andrew-carter-thornton.html">https://slate.com/culture/2021/03/cocaine-bear-elizabeth-banks-lord-miller-warden-andrew-carter-thornton.html</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri">- -</font></p>
<i><font face="Calibri">[ see a few trailers and reviews ]</font></i><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>Cocaine Bear - Movie Review</b><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYUJrUQP30M">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYUJrUQP30M</a></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>The Untold Story of the Cocaine Bear</b><br>
</font><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz6eGYbd_Bg">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz6eGYbd_Bg</a><br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"> <i>[ some more delightfully childish humor -
with a correct and clear message -- 1 minute video cartoon ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font> <font face="Calibri"><b>Vega_Film_ClimateHealers</b></font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Introducing Vega, the Cow in the Room...</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://vimeo.com/639434716?cmid=b458d516-c38d-4c78-898c-71dc453b2712">https://vimeo.com/639434716?cmid=b458d516-c38d-4c78-898c-71dc453b2712</a></font><br>
<p><br>
</p>
<font face="Calibri"><i>[The news archive - looking back - is it
humorous hubris? or outrage? ]</i><br>
<font size="+2"><i><b>February 26, 2001</b></i></font> <br>
February 26, 2001: In a tense exchange with CNN "Crossfire"
co-host Robert Novak, EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman
states that President George W. Bush will follow through on his
September 2000 campaign pledge to set firm limits on carbon
emissions--a statement that Bush himself would effectively disavow
a month later. Footage of the CNN exchange is included in the 2007
PBS "Frontline" documentary "Hot Politics."<br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0102/26/cf.00.html">http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0102/26/cf.00.html</a></font><font
face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/hotpolitics/">http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/hotpolitics/</a></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><font face="Calibri">=======================================
</font><br>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font> <font face="Calibri"><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is
lacking, many </span>daily summaries<span
class="moz-txt-tag"> deliver global warming news - a few are
email delivered*</span></b> <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><br>
=========================================================<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every
day or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s
top headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the
day, delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant
reporting. It also provides original reporting and commentary on
climate denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise
remain largely unexposed. 5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon Brief Daily </b><span
class="moz-txt-star"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days.
Better than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
<br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri">
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a personal hobby production curated
by Richard Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</font>
</body>
</html>