<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="+2"><font face="Calibri"><i><b>April</b></i></font></font><font
size="+2" face="Calibri"><i><b> 12, 2023</b></i></font><br>
</p>
<i><font face="Calibri">[ A simple, clear explanation in a 6 min
video ]</font></i>
<br>
<b>The tricky plan to pull CO2 out of the air</b><br>
<font face="Calibri">Vox</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">541,603 views Apr 6, 2023</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Will carbon dioxide removal work? It has to.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you
don't miss any videos: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://goo.gl/0bsAjO">http://goo.gl/0bsAjO</a> </font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">In recent years, over 70 countries have
committed to net-zero carbon emissions, aiming to become carbon
neutral by mid-century. The 2015 Paris Agreement aimed to keep
global warming below 2 degrees Celsius and ideally limit it to 1.5
degrees above pre-industrial levels. Despite global efforts,
emissions are still rising, and achieving the 1.5-degree goal has
become increasingly difficult.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Most pathways to keep warming below 2 degrees,
and eventually return back to 1.5 rely on negative emissions,
which involve pulling carbon dioxide from the atmosphere using
carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods like enhanced weathering and
direct air capture.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">However, these techniques are still in early
development stages, and require land, energy, and money. Critics
argue that relying on CDR implicitly encourages governments and
companies to postpone necessary emissions reductions because
counting on CDR now means relying on future generations of leaders
to deliver on those promises. Preventing emissions is broadly less
costly than cleaning them up after the fact. But even with
dramatic cuts to emissions, experts say some amount of CDR will
still be necessary.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfNr2zUDEZc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfNr2zUDEZc</a></font><br>
<i><font face="Calibri"></font></i>
<p><i><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></i></p>
<p><i><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></i></p>
<i><font face="Calibri">[ cold, corrugated sea floor - science
explained ]</font></i><br>
<i><font face="Calibri"> </font></i><font face="Calibri"><b>Glacial
Retreat of 610 meters (2013 ft) per day occurred in Past,
Leaving Corrugated Seafloor Ridges</b></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> Paul Beckwith</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> 25.9K subscribers</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Paul Beckwith</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Who needs to go to a horror movie? Just learn
about the very latest cutting edge climate science instead.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> A very disturbing peer-reviewed scientific
paper was just released online (open source, this means it is
accessible to all for free). <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05876-1">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05876-1</a>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> This paper used high-resolution sonar to map
the ocean seafloor on the continental shelves off Norwegian
glaciers. During the last ice age, the on-land glaciers expanded
far out over the continental shelves, the ice sheets rested on the
continental shelf seafloor and then extended outward to floating
ice shelves. The Grounding Line is the furthest extent seaward
where the ice sheet rests on the ocean floor. The peak of the last
ice age, where the glacier extent was maximum was roughly 21,000
years ago. Since then, there was melting and loss of the ice
sheets, and therefore retreat of the grounding line.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> The tides are semi-diurnal off the Norway
coast, meaning they cycled from high tide to low tide twice a day
(hi-lo-hi-lo each day). At each low, the ice sheet ground into the
ocean sediments, leaving a corrugating ridge parallel to the land,
so two ridges were imprinted per day at the grounding line as the
ice retreated. By simply measuring the distance between the
ridges, we know the retreat rates of the ice per day. </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> This new study examined numerous ridges over a
widespread region on the Norwegian continental shelves. The really
scary finding is that the ice retreat rate was as high as 610
meters per day (2013 feet per day), and this rate could be
maintained for at least 21 days. This rate is much higher than
anything previously observed, and thus it means that huge ice
sheets can melt much faster than we previously thought, and
therefore sea level rise can occur much faster than we think.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> I’m not surprised, this is all part and parcel
of abrupt climate system change.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><font face="Calibri"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plSMbst7iJU">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plSMbst7iJU</a></font><br>
<i><font face="Calibri"> </font></i>
<p><i><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></i></p>
<br>
<i><font face="Calibri">[Â Â NYT Non-fiction text ]</font></i><br>
<font face="Calibri"><b>The Unequal Racial Burdens of Rising Seas</b></font><br>
<font face="Calibri">In “Charleston,” a case study of climate change
and government negligence in the South Carolina city, Susan
Crawford makes clear the disproportionate costs borne by
communities of color in the coastal United States.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri">By Emily Raboteau</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> April 10, 2023</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri">All true climate-change stories are about the
abuse of power. Knowing this, Susan Crawford makes a plea for
climate justice in “Charleston,” her sweeping case study of the
South Carolina city. Her premise is that this imperiled place is a
bellwether for the rest of the coastal United States, where
government at every level is failing to prepare for the
catastrophic effects of sea level rise and increasingly severe
storms, which are threatening lives and causing billions of
dollars in damage.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> It’s a purposefully unsettling premise.
Charleston’s woeful lack of planning for the displacement by
flooding of its Black and low-income residents — while the city
acts to protect high-value real estate and recklessly develop
where it should not be building — is hardly unique in the land of
the dollar. What is unique about Charleston, in Crawford’s view,
is the misalliance between its reputation for charming hospitality
and the burden of risk allotted to its poorest residents. Even for
readers who already know whose lives matter in this calculus, and
whose don’t, Charleston’s story is instructive.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> At least 13 million Americans are expected to
have to move away from the nation’s coasts in the decades to come.
Reading this book reminded me that my family and I will likely
number among them. (The first thing I did after finishing it was
check with my husband about our flood insurance status.) Crawford
is not the only writer to predict that our mass migration will be
forced, frenzied and, above all, unfair — unless we plan as a
nation for managed retreat, right now.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> “Charleston” joins a platoon of important
books published in the last few years that, each in its own way,
have sounded the same alarm, some tilting more toward realpolitik.
These include Jeff Goodell’s “The Water Will Come,” Elizabeth
Rush’s “Rising,” Gilbert M. Gaul’s “The Geography of Risk,” Orrin
H. Pilkey and Keith C. Pilkey’s “Sea Level Rise” and John
Englander’s “Moving to Higher Ground.” One hopes these works will
have a cumulative impact on local, state and federal policy in
their shared concern that the most vulnerable among us don’t get
left behind as the waters rise.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Crawford’s book stands apart from its
predecessors because of its sustained focus on one threatened
city. (In that sense, it shares something with the also excellent
“More City Than Water: A Houston Flood Atlas,” edited by Lacy M.
Johnson and Cheryl Beckett.) Charleston is a fascinating and
haunted locale, and Crawford is gifted at sketching its grossness
and grace. It’s located in South Carolina Lowcountry. Its historic
peninsula is flanked by two rivers and surrounded by outer
boroughs, all of which lie low and flat. More than a third of its
homes sit on land that is less than 10 feet above sea level. Much
of the city was built not on solid ground but on fill: trash,
oyster shells, human waste, graves, loose dirt plopped over
centuries atop marshland. People who live there have gotten so
used to high-tide flooding on sunny days that they now check the
tide charts before getting into their cars.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Crawford doesn’t go as far into the dystopian
future as she could have. Her reason for picking Charleston as a
site of scrutiny is that it sits so squarely at the intersection
of climate change and race. We do learn in these pages about what
life will be like in Charleston by 2050 when damaging flooding is
projected to happen 10 times as often as it did last year,
particularly for its Black residents. But just as important, we go
deep into the marl of history.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> Like a tour guide walking us back in time and
across town, Crawford shows us the ways in which legacies of
slavery and racism have shaped Charleston’s response to the
present. A professor at Harvard Law School, where she teaches
courses on climate adaptation and public leadership, Crawford was
previously President Barack Obama’s special assistant for science,
technology and innovation policy. She excels at writing about
political cowardice. She uses maps effectively throughout. She has
the good sense, as an outsider, to introduce us to locals and pass
them the mic. In fact, she’s organized many of the book’s chapters
by neighborhood, pairing them with profiles of and sophisticated
analyses by Black Charlestonians from that part of town.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> We hear the voices of the Rev. Joseph Darby, a
minister with a lot to say about the city’s overlapping problems
of race and water, as well as about its “raging politeness”;
Michelle Mapp, a lawyer with the A.C.L.U. who formerly directed
the local housing trust; Quinetha Frasier, a young entrepreneur
with Gullah Geechee roots and well grounded fears about the
displacement of her people; Charlton Singleton, a jazz trumpeter
who mourns the loss of the city’s historically Black communities
to gentrification; and Mika Gadsden, a founder of the Charleston
Activist Network who’s running for mayor on the following
platform: “We deserve a Charleston that affirms love for all its
people through policy and practice.”</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Crawford’s own perspective is delightfully
pointed: “The place has an amnesiac, ahistorical quality that is
highly attractive to white celebrants, who drowsily pad along its
pretty streets before tucking into their next big meal; they are
enjoying the suggestion of moneyed graciousness around them, not
thinking too hard about where that money came from.” The Holy City
may be a top tourist destination, but Crawford makes it clear
we’re not here to relax. We’re here to do some tough reckoning
with what compounded denial, boosterism, widespread development,
segregation, gentrification, white supremacy and public
complacency have wrought.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> For centuries, Charleston has played a
starring role in the nation’s tortured racial history: first as a
major slave port, then as a central domestic slave market, then as
the spot where the Civil War started, at which point the ratio of
Black people to white in the state was around 3 to 1. Charleston’s
economy was developed on the backs of the enslaved who worked in
the rice paddies and picked the indigo and filled the soggy edges
of the peninsula with trash and rubble and offal so the city could
grow. Which it did in spades, most remarkably in the three decades
following Hurricane Hugo in 1989, when the local mayor harnessed
national attention plus public funding to develop the peninsula
and spread outward, over marshes and sea islands — a process that
involved annexing suburbs, attracting retirees, gentrifying
rampantly and transforming a majority Black city into a majority
white one.</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> Discrimination persisted into the current era,
during which, after the massacre at Mother Emanuel A.M.E. Church
in 2015, long-simmering tensions boiled into protest that finally
brought down the Confederate flag at the state capitol. But if
you’ve gone through centuries of second-class citizenship and
generations of flooding without being heard or helped to get to
higher ground by the city you built, as the toxic sludge pulls at
your ankles, you must ask yourself, is this progress?</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> For white and wealthy residents, Charleston’s
quandary is a real estate issue. But whether to sell now or stay
is a question that its poor may not have the luxury of posing. For
these citizens — renters and public-housing residents — the issue
is a moral one. As the historian Annette Gordon-Reed asks in her
foreword to the book, “Will the government authorities be able to
rise above historical patterns and take action on behalf of the
marginalized people in the city?”</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> Crawford wouldn’t have written this book if
she thought the answer was no. Her vision for Charleston involves
revising, resettling, rewilding and redrawing the metropolitan
map. She’s not alone in imagining that the city, and by extension
the nation, has the potential to get this transition right. Toward
the end of her book, she quotes Michelle Mapp, who’s not giving
up: “If Charleston can change, the South can change. If the South
can change, America can change.” But so much depends upon who’s
seated at the table of power...</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font><font face="Calibri"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/10/books/review/charleston-susan-crawford.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/10/books/review/charleston-susan-crawford.html</a></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font> </p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> <i>[ WBUR - NPR  audio - text ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font> <font face="Calibri"><b>Climate
solutions do exist. These 6 experts detail what they look like</b></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> Play</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> March 05, 2023</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> Julia Simon</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> </font> Scientists say there's a lot we can
still do to slow the speed of climate change. But when it comes to
"climate solutions", some are real, and some aren't, says Naomi
Oreskes, historian of science at Harvard University. "This space
has become really muddied," she says.<br>
<br>
So how does someone figure out what's legit? We asked six climate
scholars for the questions they ask themselves whenever they come
across something claiming to be a climate solution.<br>
<br>
<b>A big climate solution is an obvious one</b><br>
It may sound basic, but one big way to address climate change is
to reduce the main human activity that caused it in the first
place: burning fossil fuels.<br>
<br>
Scientists say that means ultimately transitioning away from oil,
coal and gas and becoming more energy efficient. We already have a
lot of the technology we need to make this transition, like solar,
wind, and batteries, Oreskes says.<br>
<br>
"What we need to do right now is to mobilize the technologies that
already exist, that work and are cost competitive, and that
essentially means renewable energy and storage," she says.<br>
<br>
<b>Think about who's selling you the solution</b><br>
It's important to think about both who's selling you the climate
solution and what they say the problem is, says Melissa Aronczyk,
professor of media at Rutgers University.<br>
<br>
"People like to come up with solutions, but to do that, they
usually have to interpret the problem in a way that works for
them," she says.<br>
<br>
Oreskes says pay attention when you see a "climate solution" that
means increasing the use of fossil fuels. She says an example is
natural gas, which has been sold as a "bridge fuel" from coal to
renewable energy. But natural gas is still a fossil fuel, and its
production, transport and use release methane, a greenhouse gas
far more potent than carbon dioxide.<br>
<br>
"I think we need to start by looking at what happens when the
fossil fuel industry comes up with solutions, because here is the
greatest potential for conflict of interest," Aronczyk says.<br>
<br>
<b>A solution may sound promising, but is it available and
scalable now?</b><br>
Sometimes you'll hear about new promising technology like carbon
removal, which vacuums carbon dioxide out of the air and stores it
underground, says David Ho, a professor of oceanography at
University of Hawaii at Manoa.<br>
<br>
Ho researches climate solutions and he says ask yourself: is this
technology available, affordable, or scalable now?<br>
<br>
"I think people who don't work in this space think we have all
these technologies that are ready to remove carbon dioxide from
the atmosphere, for instance. And we're not there," Ho says...<br>
<br>
<b>If it's adding emissions, it's not a climate solution</b><br>
These days all kinds of companies, from airlines to wedding dress
companies, might offer to let you buy "carbon offsets" along with
your purchase. That offset money could do something like build a
new wind farm or plant trees that would - in theory - soak up and
store the equivalent carbon dioxide emissions of taking a flight
or making a new dress.<br>
<br>
But there are often problems with regulation and verification of
offsets, says Roberto Schaeffer, a professor of energy economics
at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. "It's very
dangerous, very dangerous indeed," he says.<br>
<br>
WBUR is a nonprofit news organization. Our coverage relies on your
financial support. If you value articles like the one you're
reading right now, give today.<br>
<br>
He says with offsets from forests, it's hard to verify if the
trees are really being protected, that those trees won't get cut
down or burned in a wildfire.<br>
<br>
"You cannot guarantee, 'Okay, you're gonna offset your dress by
planting a tree.' You have no guarantee that in three years time
that tree is gonna be there," he says.<br>
<br>
If you make emissions thinking you're offsetting them, and the
offset doesn't work, that's doubling the emissions, says Adrienne
Buller, a climate finance researcher and director of research at
Common Wealth, a think tank in the United Kingdom, "It's sort of
like doubly bad."<br>
<br>
<b>If a solution sounds too easy, be skeptical</b><br>
Many things sold as carbon offsets - like restoring or protecting
forests - are, on their own, great climate solutions, Buller says.
"We need things like trees," she says, "To draw carbon out of the
atmosphere."<br>
<br>
The problem is when carbon markets sell the idea that you can
continue emitting as usual and everything will be fine if you just
buy an offset, Buller says. "It's kind of a solution that implies
that we don't have to do that much hard work. We can just kind of
do some minor tweaks to the way that we currently do things," she
says.<br>
<br>
Schaeffer says there is a lot of hard work in our future to get
off of fossil fuels and onto clean energy sources. "So people have
to realize there is a price to pay here. No free lunch."<br>
<br>
<b>It's not all about business. Governments must play a role in
solutions, too</b><br>
We often think of businesses working on climate solutions on their
own, but that's often not the case, says Oreskes. Government often
plays a big role in funding and research support for new climate
technology, says June Sekera, a visiting scholar at The New School
who studies public policy and climate.<br>
<br>
And governments will also have to play a big role in regulating
emissions, says Schaeffer, who has been working with the United
Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for 25 years.<br>
<br>
That's why all the scholars NPR spoke with for this story say one
big climate solution is to vote.<br>
<br>
Schaeffer points to the recent election in Brazil, where climate
change was a big campaign issue for candidate Luiz Inácio Lula da
Silva. Lula won, and has promised to address deforestation, a big
source of Brazil's emissions.<br>
<br>
<b>There's no one solution to climate change - and no one can do
it alone</b><br>
Aronczyk wants to make one thing clear: there is no one solution
to climate change.<br>
<br>
"We're human beings. We encounter a problem, we wanna solve that
problem," Aronczyk says, "But just as there is no one way to
describe climate change, there's no one way to offer a solution."<br>
<br>
Climate solutions will take different forms, Sekera says. Some
solutions may slow climate change, some may offer us ways to
adapt.<br>
<br>
The key thing, Aronczyk says, is that climate solutions will
involve governments, businesses, and individuals. She says: "It is
an all hands on deck kind of a situation."<br>
    Copyright NPR 2023.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.wbur.org/npr/1160783951/6-scholars-explain-what-a-real-climate-solution-is">https://www.wbur.org/npr/1160783951/6-scholars-explain-what-a-real-climate-solution-is</a><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><font face="Calibri"> </font> </p>
<font face="Calibri"> <br>
</font><font face="Calibri"> <i>[The news archive - looking back at
demonstrable activism ]</i></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> <font size="+2"><i><b>April 12, 2015</b></i></font>
</font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> April 12, 2015:</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">• Harvard Heat Week--a series of demonstrations
against Harvard University's refusal to sever ties with the fossil
fuel industry--begins in Cambridge, Massachusetts.</font><br>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri">OPINION | BILL MCKIBBEN</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">Shake Harvard free of oil stock</font><br>
<font face="Calibri">By Bill McKibben </font><br>
<font face="Calibri">April 7, 2015, 4:10 p.m.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">To understand why prominent Harvard alumni
are joining students to demand their alma mater divest its
fossil fuel stock, consider how the university has behaved.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Here was the scene last fall. In New York,
400,000 climate protesters marched down 6th Avenue, the largest
demonstration about any issue in the United States in years.
Also, the World Council of Churches, representing 580 million
Christians, announced plans to divest its fossil fuel holdings.
Then members of the Rockefeller family — the first family of
fossil fuel — took the same step.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">And in Cambridge? After huge majorities of
Harvard students asked for divestment, and after a letter signed
by much of the faculty backed the request, the Harvard
Corporation septupled its direct investments in fossil fuels.
Most of Harvard’s investments are secret, but in the relatively
small portion of its portfolio that it discloses, it increased
by a factor of seven its investment during the third quarter of
2014. Talk about sending a message.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">The biggest of those new investments
illustrates everything that’s wrong with Harvard’s stance, and
helps make it clear why prominent alumni from Cornell West to
Bevis Longstreth (two-time Reagan appointee to the SEC) to
Natalie Portman have called for sit-ins in Harvard Yard later
this month. According to an investigation by Chloe Maxmin, a
student co-founder of DivestHarvard, the university plunked down
$57.4 million for a stake in Anadarko Petroleum, one of the
country’s biggest independent oil and gas exploration firms.
Anadarko not only played a cameo role in the Deepwater Horizon
tragedy, but also just paid the federal government $5 billion to
settle the “largest environmental contamination case in American
history.”</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">But hey, anyone can make mistakes. The real
story is what Anadarko does on purpose. It hunts for new sources
of oil and gas — even though climate scientists have said that
we have far more carbon in our current reserves than we could
possibly burn and keep the planet from catastrophe. And if you
don’t trust the scientists? Here’s Mark Carney (Harvard Class of
’88) from his radical post as governor of the Bank of England,
also last fall: “The vast majority of reserves are unburnable.”</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Even with falling oil prices causing all
drillers to cut back for the moment, Anadarko reassured its
shareholders in late March that this year it “expects to drill
nine to 12 deepwater exploration/appraisal wells focusing on
play-opening exploration opportunities in Colombia, Kenya, and
the Gulf of Mexico.” Once more: We already have discovered, by
nearly every estimate, far more oil than we can burn, and yet
Anadarko keeps looking for more.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Behaving with this kind of irresponsibility
gets harder and harder in a world where drought, flood, and
endless snow make clearer each day the toll climate change takes
on us all, especially the poorest and most vulnerable. But never
fear. Here’s the method an Anadarko executive recommended to a
2011 conference of industry peers on how to face down
anti-fracking citizens groups: “I want you to download the US
Army/Marine Corps counterinsurgency manual because we are
dealing with an insurgency here.”</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">That’s the ground war — but Anadarko hasn’t
neglected to pay off the generals either. It has donated more
than $5 million to members of Congress since 1990, almost all of
it to Republicans, including a hefty chunk to Senator James
Inhofe of Oklahoma, one of the country’s most outspoken climate
deniers.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Universities from Stanford to Sydney to
Scotland to Stockholm have begun the process of divesting from
companies like Anadarko, Shell, Exxon, and Gazprom. The World
Bank and the International Energy Agency, HSBC, and Deutschebank
have done their patient best in the last year or two to explain
that we need less carbon, not more.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">At Harvard, though, there’s no commitment at
all. It’s business as usual, with a kind of sad obliviousness to
the realities of the day. That’s why we’ve got to park ourselves
in Harvard Yard this spring, and hope through nonviolent witness
to shake the richest university in the world out of its
persistent, willful slumber.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Bill McKibben, a graduate of Harvard
University, is founder of the climate group 350.org and the
Schumann distinguished scholar in environmental studies at
Middlebury College.</font><br>
</blockquote>
<font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/04/07/wake-harvard-time-divest-from-fossil-fuels/9xT2pzgtL8PIpI7UakKyOJ/story.html?event=event25">http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/04/07/wake-harvard-time-divest-from-fossil-fuels/9xT2pzgtL8PIpI7UakKyOJ/story.html?event=event25</a></font><br>
<font face="Calibri"> <br>
<br>
</font>
<p><font face="Calibri">======================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*Mass media is lacking, many </span>daily
summaries<span class="moz-txt-tag"> deliver global warming
news - a few are email delivered*</span></b> <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><br>
=========================================================<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b>*Inside Climate News</b><br>
Newsletters<br>
We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every
day or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s
top headlines deliver the full story, for free.<br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://insideclimatenews.org/">https://insideclimatenews.org/</a><br>
--------------------------------------- <br>
*<b>Climate Nexus</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*">https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/*</a>
<br>
Delivered straight to your inbox every morning, Hot News
summarizes the most important climate and energy news of the
day, delivering an unmatched aggregation of timely, relevant
reporting. It also provides original reporting and commentary on
climate denial and pro-polluter activity that would otherwise
remain largely unexposed.   5 weekday <br>
================================= <br>
</font> <font face="Calibri"><b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>Carbon Brief Daily </b><span
class="moz-txt-star"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up">https://www.carbonbrief.org/newsletter-sign-up</a></span><b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> <br>
Every weekday morning, in time for your morning coffee, Carbon
Brief sends out a free email known as the “Daily Briefing” to
thousands of subscribers around the world. The email is a digest
of the past 24 hours of media coverage related to climate change
and energy, as well as our pick of the key studies published in
the peer-reviewed journals. <br>
more at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief">https://www.getrevue.co/publisher/carbon-brief</a>
<br>
================================== <br>
*T<b>he Daily Climate  </b>Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*">https://ehsciences.activehosted.com/f/61*</a>
<br>
Get The Daily Climate in your inbox - FREE! Top news on climate
impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered week days.
Better than coffee. <br>
Other newsletters at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/">https://www.dailyclimate.org/originals/</a>
<br>
  <br>
</font> </p>
<font face="Calibri">
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
<br>
/Archive of Daily Global Warming News <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/">https://pairlist10.pair.net/pipermail/theclimate.vote/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
/To receive daily mailings - click to Subscribe <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request"><mailto:subscribe@theClimate.Vote?subject=Click%20SEND%20to%20process%20your%20request></a>
to news digest./<br>
<br>
Privacy and Security:*This mailing is text-only. It does not
carry images or attachments which may originate from remote
servers. A text-only message can provide greater privacy to the
receiver and sender. This is a personal hobby production curated
by Richard Pauli<br>
By regulation, the .VOTE top-level domain cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Messages have no tracking software.<br>
To subscribe, email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote">contact@theclimate.vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:contact@theclimate.vote"><mailto:contact@theclimate.vote></a>
with subject subscribe, To Unsubscribe, subject: unsubscribe<br>
Also you may subscribe/unsubscribe at <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote">https://pairlist10.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/theclimate.vote</a><br>
Links and headlines assembled and curated by Richard Pauli for <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://TheClimate.Vote">http://TheClimate.Vote</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://TheClimate.Vote/"><http://TheClimate.Vote/></a>
delivering succinct information for citizens and responsible
governments of all levels. List membership is confidential and
records are scrupulously restricted to this mailing list. <br>
</font>
</body>
</html>